Upload
shinji
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
40-Gb/s directly-modulated photonic crystal
lasers under optical injection-locking
Chin-Hui Chen,1,*
Koji Takeda,1 Akihiko Shinya,
2 Kengo Nozaki,
2 Tomonari Sato,
1
Yoshihiro Kawaguchi,1 Masaya Notomi,
2 and Shinji Matsuo
1
1NTT Photonics Laboratories, NTT Corp., 3-1 Morinosato-Wakamiya, Atsugi, Kanagawa 243-0198, Japan 2NTT Basic Research Laboratories, NTT Corp., 3-1 Morinosato-Wakamiya, Atsugi, Kanagawa 243-0198, Japan
Abstract: CMOS integrated circuits (IC) usually requires high data
bandwidth for off-chip input/output (I/O) data transport with sufficiently
low power consumption in order to overcome pin-count limitation. In order
to meet future requirements of photonic network interconnect, we propose
an optical output device based on an optical injection-locked photonic
crystal (PhC) laser to realize low-power and high-speed off-chip
interconnects. This device enables ultralow-power operation and is suitable
for highly integrated photonic circuits because of its strong light-matter
interaction in the PhC nanocavity and ultra-compact size. High-speed
operation is achieved by using the optical injection-locking (OIL) technique,
which has been shown as an effective means to enhance modulation
bandwidth beyond the relaxation resonance frequency limit. In this paper,
we report experimental results of the OIL-PhC laser under various injection
conditions and also demonstrate 40-Gb/s large-signal direct modulation with
an ultralow energy consumption of 6.6 fJ/bit.
©2011 Optical Society of America
OCIS codes: (140.3520) Lasers, injection-locked; (200.4650) Optical interconnects; (230.5298)
Photonic crystals.
References and links
1. D. A. B. Miller, “Device requirements for optical interconnects to silicon chips,” Proc. IEEE 97(7), 1166–1185
(2009).
2. S. Matsuo, A. Shinya, T. Kakitsuka, K. Nozaki, T. Segawa, T. Sato, Y. Kawaguchi, and M. Notomi, “High-speed
ultracompact buried heterostructure photonic-crystal laser with 13 fJ of energy consumed per bit transmitted,”
Nat. Photonics 4(9), 648–654 (2010).
3. R. S. Tucker, “Green optical communications – part I: energy limitations in transport,” IEEE J. Sel. Top.
Quantum Electron. 17(2), 245–260 (2011).
4. S. Matsuo, A. Shinya, C.-H. Chen, K. Nozaki, T. Sato, Y. Kawaguchi, H. Taniyama, and M. Notomi, “20-Gbit/s
directly modulated photonic crystal nanocavity laser with ultra-low power consumption,” Opt. Express 19(3),
2242–2250 (2011).
5. E. K. Lau, X. Zhao, H.-K. Sung, D. Parekh, C. Chang-Hasnain, and M. C. Wu, “Strong optical injection-locked
semiconductor lasers demonstrating > 100-GHz resonance frequencies and 80-GHz intrinsic bandwidths,” Opt.
Express 16(9), 6609–6618 (2008).
6. M. Notomi and H. Taniyama, “On-demand ultrahigh-Q cavity formation and photon pinning via dynamic
waveguide tuning,” Opt. Express 16(23), 18657–18666 (2008).
7. L. A. Coldren and S. W. Corzine, Diode Lasers and Photonic Integrated Circuits, 1st ed. (Wiley, 1995).
8. A. Murakami, K. Kawashima, and K. Atsuki, “Cavity resonance shift and bandwidth enhancement in
semiconductor lasers with strong light injection,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 39(10), 1196–1204 (2003).
9. X. Zhao and C. J. Chang-Hasnain, “A new amplifier model for resonance enhancement of optically injection-
locked lasers,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 20(6), 395–397 (2008).
10. H.-K. Sung, E. K. Lau, and M. C. Wu, “Optical properties and modulation characteristics of ultra-strong
injection-locked distributed feedback lasers,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 13(5), 1215–1221 (2007).
11. E. K. Lau, H.-K. Sung, and M. C. Wu, “Frequency response enhancement of optical injection-locked lasers,”
IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 44(1), 90–99 (2008).
12. Q. V. Tran, S. Combrié, P. Colman, and A. De Rossi, “Photonic crystal membrane waveguides with low
insertion losses,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 95(6), 061105 (2009).
#151793 - $15.00 USD Received 26 Jul 2011; revised 20 Aug 2011; accepted 21 Aug 2011; published 23 Aug 2011(C) 2011 OSA 29 August 2011 / Vol. 19, No. 18 / OPTICS EXPRESS 17669
13. T. Shoji, T. Tsuchizawa, T. Watanabe, K. Yamada, and H. Morita, “Low loss mode size converter from 0.3 µm
square Si wire waveguides to singlemode fibres,” Electron. Lett. 38(25), 1669–1670 (2002).
1. Introduction
According to International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors (ITRS), in order to
realize optical interconnects that are competitive with the electrical interconnects in the 2020
– 2025 timeframe, the energy budget of optical devices should be less than 2 ~10 fJ/bit for on-
chip interconnects and 10 ~20 fJ/bit for off-chip interconnects [1]. While conventional
photonic devices are often large in physical dimensions and consume a large amount of
energy, photonic crystal (PhC) has been well recognized as a strong candidate for building
highly integrated photonic network-on-chips (NoCs) to overcome the scaling limits of CMOS
technology [2]. The ultra-compactness and low-power consumption because of strong light-
matter interaction (small mode volume and high Q-factor) in PhC nanocavities have therefore
created new opportunities for applications in power-efficient high-speed optical interconnects.
Figure 1 shows an example of photonic NoC configuration that consists of a photonic plane
overlaid on a CMOS electronic plane.
Fig. 1. Photonic NoC with a photonic plane integrated with a CMOS plane of a many-core
processor. Inset shows the proposed three-terminal output device.
Generally speaking, there are two schemes to convert electrical signals to optical signals in
a photonic NoC: (1) on-chip directly modulated lasers and (2) optical external modulators
with off-chip light sources. Compared to the latter case, the on-chip directly modulated laser
offers several advantages including compact size, high optical power efficiency, and low
energy consumption. The compact size can be realized not only by the wavelength-scale
nanocavity of lasers but also by eliminating the massively distributed waveguides in chip
packaging, which are frequently used in the scheme of off-chip light sources. Without the
additional loss due to fiber coupling and long-distance propagation in the distributed
waveguides, the optical power can therefore be used more efficiently with on-chip directly
modulated lasers. On the other hand, when we take the energy consumption of the transmitter
driver circuits into account, a well-designed driver circuit for on-chip directly modulated
lasers has comparable operating energy with the on-chip laser itself, while for the scheme of
using an external modulator, the overall energy consumption is usually dominated by the
driver circuit for the modulator, which is usually in the order of tens of pJ/bit [3]. In order to
meet the on-chip interconnect requirements in both energy and data rate, we have previously
demonstrated a high-speed ultra-compact directly modulated PhC laser with a low energy
#151793 - $15.00 USD Received 26 Jul 2011; revised 20 Aug 2011; accepted 21 Aug 2011; published 23 Aug 2011(C) 2011 OSA 29 August 2011 / Vol. 19, No. 18 / OPTICS EXPRESS 17670
consumption of 8.76 fJ/bit at 20-Gb/s [4]. In parallel to the effort towards on-chip
interconnects, we also explore the potentials of this directly modulated PhC laser to be used
for prospective off-chip interconnects.
The bandwidth requirement of optical output devices for off-chip interconnects is usually
more stringent than their on-chip counterparts, although the energy requirement can be
slightly relaxed. While we are pursuing higher chip performance with higher data rates, it
becomes more and more difficult for the off-chip I/O traffic to keep up with it. In order to
alleviate the pin-count limitations, optical output devices with high off-chip clock rate and
wavelength-division multiplexing (WDM) technology have emerged as promising means. In
practical use, however, the operational wavelength of optical devices may drift with
environment factors, which inevitably limits the minimal channel spacing in WDM. An
optical output device that can be operated at the high data rate with low energy consumption
is therefore highly desirable to reduce the total number of channels and to enable less
sophisticated transceiver designs with lower cost.
One of the major challenges for off-chip output devices is the direct modulation bandwidth
(BW) of a typical semiconductor laser, which is ultimately limited by its relaxation resonance
frequency (fr) and considered to be insufficient for future off-chip clock rate requirements.
Moreover, an adequate optical output power level of the output devices is required in order to
compensate for optical loss due to propagation and coupling to meet the requirements of
photodetector sensitivity at the receiver. While nanolasers are advantageous for low power
consumption, its sub-milliwatt (mW) output power may hinder its off-chip applications.
Optical injection-locking (OIL), on the other hand, is known to be an effective technique
to enhance both the fr and the modulation BW. The output power level and wavelength of an
injection-locked slave laser are mainly determined by the master laser at strong injection, and
therefore an output power at mW level can be easily obtained. Enhancement of fr to beyond
100 GHz has been demonstrated in VCSELs and DFB lasers [5]; however, reports on large-
signal modulation above 10 Gb/s are still missing. This is likely due to strong injection power
requirements together with practical limitations such as heating and gain compression at high
power level, which in turn limits the performance of large-signal modulation.
In this paper, we propose a three-terminal (input/output/injection) optical output device as
shown in the inset of Fig. 1. By utilizing a PhC laser with an external light injection operated
within the injection-locking range, we can realize low-power and high-speed off-chip
interconnects. Experimental results of small-signal modulation frequency response and optical
spectra under various injection conditions are reported. By optimizing the injection power and
wavelength detuning, we have successfully demonstrated flat broadband frequency response
and 40 Gb/s large-signal operation with an energy cost of 6.6 fJ/bit. The main focus of the
experiment was on modulation speed enhancement with a low energy cost operation.
Assuming the power dissipated by a properly designed electronic driver circuit for our on-
chip directly modulated laser is comparable to the power consumed by the laser itself as
suggested in [3], we can then estimate the total power of the transmitter with the proposed
BH-PhC laser to be less than 20 fJ/bit at 40Gbps. Compared with applying an off-chip
modulator that requires a high power (~25 pJ/bit) [3] wideband driver to deliver large voltage
swings, our directly modulated BH-PhC laser can provide a power efficient solution for next-
generation NoCs.
2. Buried heterostructure photonic crystal laser (BH-PhC laser)
The PhC laser contains an ultra-small buried heterostructure (BH) active region embedded in
a PhC air-bridge structure as shown in Fig. 2(a). Compared with a typical PhC configuration
formed in a thin membrane of gain material (usually InGaAsP), the introduction of the BH
region greatly improves the thermal conductivity as well as the confinements of both carriers
and photons in the cavity [2]. The BH active region with a size of 4 × 0.3 × 0.16 µm3 is placed
within a line-defect PhC waveguide (WG) in an InP slab and consists of three InGaAs
#151793 - $15.00 USD Received 26 Jul 2011; revised 20 Aug 2011; accepted 21 Aug 2011; published 23 Aug 2011(C) 2011 OSA 29 August 2011 / Vol. 19, No. 18 / OPTICS EXPRESS 17671
quantum wells with a 1.55 µm photoluminescence (PL) peak, which is sandwiched between
InGaAsP barrier layers with a 1.35 µm PL peak.
Due to the high thermal conductivity of the surrounding InP that is more than ten times
higher than that of InGaAsP, the generated heat can easily escape from the cavity. An index-
modulated mode-gap cavity with ultrahigh-Q and small mode volume [6] is formed by the BH
region in the line-defect PhC waveguide as a result of the higher refractive index of the active
region than the neighboring InP. The BH region also effectively confines the generated
carriers, and therefore a better overlap between carriers and photons provides efficient
pumping.
The line-defect PhC waveguide also serves as an input waveguide as shown in Fig. 2(b)
because InP is transparent to the 1.3 µm pumping light and thus undesired absorption outside
the cavity is ignorable. Figure 2(c) shows the FDTD-calculated mode profile without an
output waveguide. The output waveguide, as shown in Fig. 2(b), is placed at an offset position
with respect to the cavity, which enables optimized coupling between the cavity and itself [4].
This output waveguide is also used for external light injection for later experiments.
Fig. 2. (a) Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of the top view and (b) cross-sectional
view of the fabricated BH-PhC laser. (c) The FDTD mode profile of the PhC cavity calculated
without output/injection waveguide. (d) Light-in-light-out curve (L-L) of the laser. A threshold
is observed at 11 µW pump power.
The light-in-light-out (L-L) curve of this laser is shown in Fig. 2(d). A threshold power of
the BH-PhC laser is observed at 11 µW incident pump power, and the maximal output power
is around 50 µW. It has been known [7] that fr of a semiconductor laser at free-running
depends on the number of photons in the cavity. And thus, as the number of photons increases
with the pump power for the laser, the fr continues to increase until practical factors such as
gain compression and heating take effects. Moreover, higher damping at higher frequencies
also limits the maximum BW. As a result, the maximal 3-dB BW is 15.7 GHz at a pump
power of 169 µW (not shown). All the power levels in this paper refer to the power within the
PhC waveguides, unless otherwise stated. All the measurements were carried out at room-
temperature.
3. BH-PhC laser + Optical injection-locking (OIL)
The frequency response of the BH-PhC laser under injection-locking was determined by
measuring the S21 parameter with a network analyzer (NA) using the apparatus shown in Fig.
3. The frequency response at free-running was also measured with the same apparatus except
#151793 - $15.00 USD Received 26 Jul 2011; revised 20 Aug 2011; accepted 21 Aug 2011; published 23 Aug 2011(C) 2011 OSA 29 August 2011 / Vol. 19, No. 18 / OPTICS EXPRESS 17672
for the light injection. The PhC laser was optically modulated by an electrical signal from port
1 of the NA via a LiNbO3 modulator (LN-Mod) to modulate the pump light. A CW light from
a tunable laser was coupled to the PhC laser cavity through the output/injection waveguide
with an optical circulator. The injected wavelength was detuned from the PhC lasing peak at
free-running by an amount of δ, and the injection power was adjusted by a digital variable
optical attenuator (VOA). The output of the PhC laser was taken after the circulator and a
90/10 coupler, and fed into an optical spectrum analyzer (OSA) and port 2 of the NA through
an erbium-doped fiber amplifier (EDFA) followed by an optical bandpass filter. An automated
computer program was used to precisely control the injection conditions, both the power level
and wavelength detuning value, and acquire data from the NA and OSA at each injection
condition.
Fig. 3. Schematic diagram of the apparatus used for the frequency response measurement.
VOA: variable optical attenuator. BPF: optical bandpass filter. LN-Mod: lithium-niobate
modulator. EDFA: erbium-doped fiber amplifier. OSA: optical spectrum analyzer.
Figures 4(a)–4(c) show the optical spectra and Figs. 4(d)–4(f) show the frequency
responses of the PhC laser biased at a pump power of 113 µW (~10 × Pth) with various
injection conditions as indicated on the figure (−15.07, −12.07, −9.07, and −6.07 dBm). When
the PhC laser is at free-running, the coupling between carriers and photons determines its fr.
The 3-dB BW of the PhC laser at a pump power of 113 µW is around 11 GHz as shown by the
black lines in all subplots of Fig. 4.
When the PhC laser is under light injection, the injected light boosts the stimulated
emission process and depletes more carriers (∆N < 0) in the PhC cavity, which results in a
reduction of the gain for the slave PhC laser. Even though the gain is lower than its threshold
value, externally stimulated emission from the master laser compensates for this reduction,
and thus the slave laser under injection-locking is lasing at the wavelength of the master laser
(λinj). Other than the main locked mode lasing at λinj, a shifted cavity mode (λcav) on its longer
wavelength side can also be easily seen in the optical spectrum. It is known that by analyzing
the nonlinear dynamics with the commonly used Lang-Kobayashi rate equations and solving
for the steady-state solutions, the amount of cavity shift can be obtained through the linewidth
enhancement factor (α): ∆λcav = - (λ02/2πc)·α·g·∆N/2, where g is the differential gain, ∆N is the
change of carrier density, λ0 is the wavelength of the master laser, and c is the speed of light
[8]. The cavity mode is red-shifted since ∆N is always a negative number.
#151793 - $15.00 USD Received 26 Jul 2011; revised 20 Aug 2011; accepted 21 Aug 2011; published 23 Aug 2011(C) 2011 OSA 29 August 2011 / Vol. 19, No. 18 / OPTICS EXPRESS 17673
Fig. 4. (a)–(c) Optical spectra and (d)–(f) frequency responses of OIL BH-PhC laser with
injection conditions indicated. Black lines in all figures represent the PhC laser at free-running
with a pump power of 113 µW. The injection wavelength (λinj) and the shifted cavity modes
(λcav) are also shown in the figures.
Figures 4(d)–4(f) show the corresponding frequency responses over the instrument-limited
20 GHz range. The frequency responses have been calibrated to the back-to-back
configuration, and also normalized to their DC values to find their 3-dB modulation BWs.
Apparent enhancement of the fr can be observed with higher injection power, while the
response is damped to a greater extent and a low-frequency roll-off becomes obvious for
higher injection power in each subfigure. The resonance frequency (fr’) at strong OIL is
dominated by the interaction between the photons from the injection light and from the shifted
cavity mode, and the frequency difference between these two modes matches to the fr’ shown
in the frequency responses [9]. A larger damping in the frequency response curves is found to
occur at larger δ for the same injection power. As δ increases, the shifted cavity mode is also
#151793 - $15.00 USD Received 26 Jul 2011; revised 20 Aug 2011; accepted 21 Aug 2011; published 23 Aug 2011(C) 2011 OSA 29 August 2011 / Vol. 19, No. 18 / OPTICS EXPRESS 17674
suppressed further on the optical spectra. With a subtle balance among fr’, damping factor,
and a low frequency roll-off [10,11], a broadband operation can be attained.
4. Direct modulation of OIL-PhC lasers at 40-Gb/s
Figure 5 shows the eye diagrams of directly modulated 40-Gb/s nonreturn-to-zero (NRZ)
signals (a) at the input, (b) at the output of the free-running PhC laser, and (c) at the output of
the injection-locked PhC laser. Since the maximal 3-dB BW of the free-running PhC laser was
only 15.7 GHz, it results in zero eye-opening when directly modulated at 40 Gb/s regardless
of the pump power. On the other hand, a clear 40-Gb/s eye opening under injection-locking
can be observed in Fig. 5(c) with an average pump power of 50 µW and an injection power of
163 µW at δ ~ + 0.1nm. The corresponding extinction ratio of the input eye was 4.5 dB, and
that of the output eye under injection-locking was 3.2 dB.
In the case of Fig. 5(c), the energy of the BH-PhC laser under injection-locking was
estimated to be 6.6 fJ at 40-Gb/s. Here a peak value of the pump power was used instead of
the average value. The total power consumption was then calculated as the sum of the pump
power (100 µW) and the injection power (163 µW). The energy efficiency of 6.6 fJ/bit is
considered to be small enough to meet the energy efficiency requirement in later years. It is
also the smallest number, to our best knowledge, among those ever reported for any type of
semiconductor lasers. We can see that the price of the additional injection power can be
regained by the enhanced data rate in terms of the energy cost per bit. The present
demonstration is focused on modulation speed enhancement with a low energy cost and is
limited by the available power in our setup. It is believed that further improvements of the
signal quality and modulation speed can be realized with higher pump power and injection
power.
The coupling loss in the pump side and in the output side of the device can be estimated to
be 10 dB and 8.5 dB, respectively. This results in a great rise of the required external power to
be around 53.8 fJ/bit in the current apparatus. However, in the future development we may
incorporate properly designed spot-size converters (loss < 1dB possible) [12,13] so that the
fiber coupling loss and required external power can be kept minimal, and the total power
consumption can still be within < 10 fJ/bit regime.
Fig. 5. Eye diagram for 40-Gb/s direct modulation. (a) Input signal. (b) PhC laser at free-
running with pump power of 50 µW. (c) OIL-PhC laser with pump power of 50 µW and
injection power of 163 µW in the PhC waveguide.
5. Conclusion
In this paper, we proposed and demonstrated a low-power and high-speed three-terminal
device based on an OIL-PhC laser for the next-generation photonic NoCs. Enhancement of
both fr and 3-dB BW of more than 20 GHz are presented with a flat broadband frequency
response by OIL. Large-signal direct modulation at 40 Gb/s have been successfully
demonstrated with an ultralow energy cost of 6.6fJ/bit, which is the smallest number ever
reported for semiconductor lasers. The OIL-PhC laser is therefore proven to be an effective
solution to meet the future needs of photonic NoCs especially for the stringent off-chip
requirements.
#151793 - $15.00 USD Received 26 Jul 2011; revised 20 Aug 2011; accepted 21 Aug 2011; published 23 Aug 2011(C) 2011 OSA 29 August 2011 / Vol. 19, No. 18 / OPTICS EXPRESS 17675
Acknowledgment
Part of this work was supported by the National Institute of Information and Communications
Technology (NICT), Japan.
#151793 - $15.00 USD Received 26 Jul 2011; revised 20 Aug 2011; accepted 21 Aug 2011; published 23 Aug 2011(C) 2011 OSA 29 August 2011 / Vol. 19, No. 18 / OPTICS EXPRESS 17676