40255-033: Central Mekong Delta Region Connectivity Project · Central Mekong Delta Region Connectivity Project - Component 4 Resettlement Plan Page ii NOTES This Updated Resettlement

Updated Resettlement Plan

Project Number: 40255-033 Final Report April 2020

VIE: Central Mekong Delta Region Connectivity Project

Component 4: The Interconnecting Road to NH91 and Long Xuyen City Bypass

Prepared by Cuu Long Corporation for Investment, Development and Project Management of Infrastructure (Cuu Long CIPM) in coordination with People’s Committee of Long Xuyen City for the Asian Development Bank.

NOTES

CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS

(as of 02/11/2018)

For this report, the rate of $1 USD: VND 23,380 has been used.

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS

ADB Asian Development Bank

AH/AP Affected Household/Affected Person

CIPM

CPC

Cuu Long Corporation for Investment, Development and Project Management of Infrastructure

City People’s Committee

CLFD Center for Land Fund Development

DDIS Detailed Design and Implementation Support Consultant

DMS Detailed Measurement Survey

EMC External Monitor Consultant

IOL Inventory of Losses

IRP Income restoration Program

LURC Land Use Right Certificate

PPC Provincial People’s Committee

PPTA Project Preparation Technical Assistance

RCS Replacement Cost Survey

RS Resettlement Site

SES Socio - economic survey

SPS Social Policy Statement

USD US dollar

VND Vietnam dong

WU Women’s Union

This Resettlement Plan is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.

MINISTRY OF TRANSPORT

CUU LONG CORPORATION FOR INVESTMENT, DEVELOPMENT AND

PROJECT MANAGEMENT OF INFRASTRUCTURE (CUU LONG CIPM)

------- -------

CENTRAL MEKONG DELTA REGION

CONNECTIVITY PROJECT(CMDRCP) - VIET NAM

PROJECT COMPONENT 4: THE INTERCONNECTING ROAD

TO NH91 AND LONG XUYEN CITY BYPASS

(Section from Km 8 + 784 to Km 23 + 661 in An Giang province)

UPDATED RESETTLEMENT PLAN

APRIL 2020

Central Mekong Delta Region Connectivity Project - Component 4 Updated Resettlement Plan

Page i

Updated Resettlement Plan Central Mekong Delta Region Connectivity Project Component 4 Final report Loan3013-VIE: Central Mekong Delta Region Connectivity Project April 2020

VN: Central Mekong Delta Connectivity Project

Prepared by Cuu Long CIPM in coordination with People’s Committee of Long Xuyen City for the Asian Development Bank

Central Mekong Delta Region Connectivity Project - Component 4 Resettlement Plan

Page ii

NOTES

This Updated Resettlement Plan is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.


Page iii

TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ....................................................................................................... iii

LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................... vi

LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................. vi

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................................ viii

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................... xi

I. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT ............................................................................... 1

1.1 General ...................................................................................................................... 1

1.2 Component 4 - The Interconnecting Road to National Highway No. 91 and the Long Xuyen City Bypass ............................................................................................................. 1

1.3 Administrative Units Affected ...................................................................................... 5

1.4 Objectives of the Updated Resettlement Plan ............................................................ 5

1.5 Measures Taken to Reduce Resettlement .................................................................. 5

1.6 Changes Made in the component Scope .................................................................... 5

II. SCOPE OF LAND ACQUISITION AND RESETTLEMENT ........................................... 7

2.1 Method of data collection............................................................................................ 7

2.2 Cut - off date .............................................................................................................. 7

2.3 Scope of Land Acquisition and Resettlement Impacts ................................................ 7

2.3.1 Affected households ........................................................................................... 7

2.3.2 Impacts on Land ............................................................................................... 10

2.3.3 Land Tenure ..................................................................................................... 13

2.3.4 Impacts on Houses and other Structures .......................................................... 14

2.3.5 Impacts on graves ............................................................................................ 14

2.3.6 Impacts on trees and crops .............................................................................. 14

2.3.7 Impacts on Businesses ..................................................................................... 16

2.3.8 Vulnerable households ..................................................................................... 17

2.3.9 Impacts on infrastructures ................................................................................ 17

2.3.10 Temporary Impacts during the Construction Process .................................... 17

III. SOCIO-ECONOMIC INFORMATION AND PROFILE .................................................. 18

3.1 Introduction .............................................................................................................. 18

3.2 Survey Approaches and Methodologies ................................................................... 18

3.3 Socio-Economic Information on Long Xuyen City ..................................................... 19

3.4 Socio-Economic Information of Affected Households ............................................... 20

3.4.1 Survey Scope ................................................................................................... 20

3.4.2 Characteristics of Household Members ............................................................ 21

3.4.3 Education level ................................................................................................. 21

3.4.4 Occupation of Household Heads ...................................................................... 21

Central Mekong Delta Region Connectivity Project -Component 4 Updated Resettlement Plan

Page iv

3.4.5 Income level and Expenditures ......................................................................... 22

3.4.6 Living standards and living facilities of households ........................................... 23

3.4.7 Land Tenure ..................................................................................................... 24

3.4.8 Utilities and services ......................................................................................... 24

3.4.9 Health and education ........................................................................................ 24

3.4.10 Gender issues in the area ............................................................................. 25

IV. INFORMATION, CONSULTATION AND PUBLIC DISCLOSURE ............................... 27

4.1 Information dissemination......................................................................................... 27

4.1.1 Information dissemination and consultation during RP preparation (PPTA stage) 27

4.1.2 Information dissemination and consultation during RP updating ....................... 27

4.2 Public consultation ................................................................................................... 27

4.3 Information Disclosure .............................................................................................. 28

V. GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM ....................................................................... 37

5.1 Responsibility ........................................................................................................... 37

5.2 Complaint procedures .............................................................................................. 37

VI. LEGAL AND POLICY FRAMEWORK ......................................................................... 40

6.1 Relevant Laws and Regulations of Vietnam ............................................................. 40

6.2 ADB Policies ............................................................................................................ 43

6.3 Reconciliation of Government and ADB Policies on Resettlement ............................ 45

VII. ENTITLEMENTS, ASSISTANCE AND BENEFITS .................................................. 48

VIII. RESETTLEMENT ARRANGEMENTS ..................................................................... 64

8.1 Resettlement Options ............................................................................................... 64

8.2 Resettlement Demand .............................................................................................. 66

8.3 Impacts on the Host Community ............................................................................... 66

IX. INCOME RESTORATION MEASURES ....................................................................... 69

9.1 General Provisions ................................................................................................... 69

9.2 Beneficiaries............................................................................................................. 69

9.3 Demand Assessment ............................................................................................... 70

9.4 The Proposed Income Restoration Program ............................................................ 70

9.4.1 The description of the program ......................................................................... 70

9.4.2 The funding for the Income Restoration Program ............................................. 72

9.5 Budget sources ........................................................................................................ 73

9.6 Organization and coordination in the implementation of IRP .................................... 74

9.7 Implementation progress of the IRP ......................................................................... 74

9.8 Monitoring and Evaluation ........................................................................................ 75

X. RESETTLEMENT BUDGET AND FINANCING PLAN ................................................ 76

10.1 Budget source ...................................................................................................... 76

10.2 Survey on replacement cost ................................................................................. 76


Page v

10.3 Methodology for determining value of losses and compensation .......................... 76

10.4 Results of Brief Survey on Replacement Cost ...................................................... 77

10.5 Cost estimate for compensation, assistance ......................................................... 82

XI. IMPLEMENTATION ORGANIZATION ........................................................................... 84

11.1 Executing agency ................................................................................................. 84

11.2 Cuu Long Corporation for Investment, Development and Project Management of Infrastructure (CIPM) ....................................................................................................... 84

11.3 PC of An Giang Province ...................................................................................... 84

11.4 PC of Long Xuyen City ......................................................................................... 84

11.5 Resettlement committee ....................................................................................... 85

11.6 Centre for Land Fund Development (CLFD) ......................................................... 85

11.7 PC of commune/ward ........................................................................................... 86

11.8 Local mass organizations ..................................................................................... 86

11.9 Detailed Design and Implementation Support (DDIS) Consultant ......................... 86

XII. IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE .................................................................................. 88

12.1 Resettlement activities .......................................................................................... 88

12.2 Implementation plan ............................................................................................. 89

XIII. MONITORING AND REPORTING ........................................................................... 90

13.1 Objectives ............................................................................................................ 90

13.2 Internal monitoring ................................................................................................ 90

13.3 External supervision ............................................................................................. 91

XIV. APPENDIXES .......................................................................................................... 93


Page vi

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1. Typical Road Cross Section .................................................................................... 2

Figure 2. Road connecting NH91 and the bypass road of Long Xuyen city ............................ 4

Figure 3. Location of Resettlement Site in Long Xuyen City ................................................. 67

Figure 4. Layout of the expanded resettlement site on West of Univesity............................. 68

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1: Administrative Units being Affected by the project .................................................... 5

Table 2: Number of Affected Households by the Project ........................................................ 8

Table 3: Summary of impacts magnitude of the Subproject ................................................... 9

Table 4 : Summary Land Acquisition (m2) ............................................................................ 11

Table 5 : Residential Land Acquisition (m2) .......................................................................... 12

Table 6 : Summary of affected agricultural land ................................................................... 12

Table 7 : Land tenure status ................................................................................................ 13

Table 9 : Summary on affected trees and crops ................................................................... 16

Table 10: Impacts on Affected Businesses .......................................................................... 16

Table 11: Information about vulnerable households in the project area ................................ 17

Table 13: Socio-Economic Survey Scope in the Project area ............................................... 20

Table 14: Education level of household heads ..................................................................... 21

Table 15: Occupation of household heads divided into each commune/ward ...................... 22

Table 16: Average income/person/month ............................................................................. 22

Table 17: Living facilities of household ................................................................................. 24

Table 18: Participation in community activities ..................................................................... 25

Table 19: Public Consultation on Land Acquisition and Resettlement .................................. 29

Table 20: Results of Public Consultation Meetings ............................................................. 30

Table 22: Gaps between National Laws and ADB Policies and Gap Filling Measures .......... 46

Table 24: Quantity of plots and area of each plot in RS ....................................................... 65

Table 25: Summary of resettlement demand ....................................................................... 66

Table 27: Number of households eligible for IRP ................................................................ 70

Table 28: Vocational Training Courses in Long Xuyen City .................................................. 71

Table 29: The funding for the implementation of the income restoration program ............... 73

Table 30: Detailed Budget for the IRP ................................................................................. 73

Table 31: Expected schedule for the Implementation of the IRP .......................................... 75

Table 32: The applied replacement cost for land .................................................................. 77

Table 33: Market prices for houses and structures proposed to apply for the Project ........... 80

Table 34: Summary of Cost Estimates ................................................................................. 83

Table 35: Implementation schedule .................................................................................... 89


Page vii

CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS

(as of 02/11/2018)

For this report, the rate of $1 USD: VND 23,380 has been used.


Page viii

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS

ADB Asian Development Bank

AH/AP Affected Household/Affected Person

CIPM CPC

Cuu Long Corporation for Investment, Development and Project Management of Infrastructure City People’s Committee

CLFD Center for Land Fund Development

DDIS Detailed Design and Implementation Support Consultant

DMS Detailed Measurement Survey

EMC External Monitor Consultant

IOL Inventory of Losses

IRP Income restoration Program

LURC Land Use Right Certificate

PPC Provincial People’s Committee

PPTA Project Preparation Technical Assistance

RCS Replacement Cost Survey

RS Resettlement Site

SES Socio - economic survey

SPS Safeguard Policy Statement

USD US dollar

VND Vietnam dong

WU Women’s Union


Page ix

DEFINITION OF TERMS

Compensation - This is payment given in cash or in kind to affected persons (APs) at replacement cost or at current market value for assets and income sources acquired or adversely affected by the project.

Cut-off date

-

Is the date of the official public announcement to each AHs by Can Tho City PC and An Giang PPC. Anyone who occupies or encroaches into the defined boundaries of the Project area after this date is not entitled to compensation and other assistance for affected assets and incomes

Detailed Measurement Survey (DMS)

- With the use of approved detailed engineering drawings, this activity involves the finalization and/or validation of the results of the IOL, severity of impacts, and list of APs done during the preparation of this Resettlement Plan (RP).

Affected Household (AH)

- Refers to any person or persons, household, firm, private or public institution that, on account of changes resulting from the Project, will have its (i) standard of living adversely affected; (ii) right, title or interest in any house, land (e.g., residential, commercial, agricultural, and/or grazing land), water resources or any other fixed assets acquired, possessed, restricted or otherwise adversely affected, in full or in part, permanently or temporarily; and/or (iii) business, occupation, place of work or residence or habitat adversely affected, with or without physical displacement.

In the case of affected household (AH), it includes all members residing under one roof and operating as a single economic unit, who are adversely affected by the project.

Ethnic minority - Any of the 53 ethnic groups in Viet Nam other than the majority Kinh (Viet) and Hoa ethnic group that possess the following characteristics in varying degrees - collective attachment to geographically distinct habitats or ancestral territories in the project area and to the natural resources in these habitats and territories; and customary cultural, economic, social, or political institutions that are separate from those of the dominant Kinh (Viet) society and culture.

Entitlement - Refers to a range of measures, such as compensation in cash or in kind, income restoration support, transfer assistance, relocation support, etc., which are provided to the APs depending on the type and severity of their losses to restore their economic and social base.

Host community Community residing in or near the area to which affected people are to be relocated.


Page x

Inventory of Losses (IOL)

- This is the listing of assets as a preliminary record of affected or lost assets during the preparation of the RP where all fixed assets (i.e., land used for residence, commerce, agriculture; dwelling units; stalls and shops; secondary structures, such as fences, tombs, wells; standing crops and trees with commercial value; etc.) and sources of income and livelihood inside the Corridor of Impact (COI) are identified, measured, their owners identified, their exact location pinpointed, and their replacement costs calculated. The severity of impact on the affected assets and the severity of impact on the livelihood and productive capacity of the DPs are likewise determined.

Involuntary Resettlement

- It is the displacement of people, not of their own volition but involuntarily, from their homes, assets, sources of income and livelihood in the ROW in connection with the Project.

Relocation

- This is the physical displacement of an AH from his/her pre-project place of residence and/or business.

Replacement cost

- Means the amount in cash or in kind needed to replace an asset in its existing condition, without deduction of transaction costs or depreciation and salvageable materials, at prevailing current market value at the time of compensation payment.

Replacement Cost Study

- This refers to the process involved in determining replacement costs of affected assets based on empirical data.

Resettlement

- This is a time-bound action plan with budget, setting out the resettlement objectives and strategies, entitlements, activities and responsibilities, resettlement monitoring, and resettlement evaluation.

Right of way (ROW)

Severely affected households

-

This is the area which will be cleared of all structures and obstructions.

This refers to AHs who will (i) lose 10% or more of their total productive assets, (ii) have to relocate, and/or (iii) lose 10% or more of their total income sources due to the project.

Vulnerable groups - These are distinct groups of people who might suffer disproportionately or face the risk of being further marginalized due to the project and specifically include: (i) Poor households; (ii) Near-poor households; (iii) Female-headed households with dependents; (iv) Policy households; (v) Disabled households; (vi) Elderly households; (vii) Landless households; (viii) ethnic minorities.


Page xi

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Project Description: Component 4: Construction of the Interconnecting Road to National Highway No 91 and Long Xuyen City Bypass is part of the Central Mekong Delta Connectivity project. It starts at the intersection with provincial road 921, in Thot Not district of Can Tho city, and ends in front of Can Xay church, in Long Xuyen city of An Giang province. The road length is about 23.6 km. Only one section of this road (15.7 km) will be funded by ADB & DFAT. The other section will use other funds. The project also includes the upgrading of a 2 km section of NH80.

Scope of the Resettlement Plan: Two Resettlement Plans (RP) were prepared in January 2011, under ADB PPTA 7045-VIE, based on preliminary design. These RPs covered the section within the administrative boundaries of Thoi Thuan Ward (Can Tho City) and Long Xuyen City (An Giang Province). These RPs were however never been approved by ADB. Therefore, a new RP, based on IOL data, need to be prepared. This RP is also based on the change of scope of the Project and on the new preliminary design approved under Decision No. 2527/QD-TTg dated 27/12/2016 and Decision No. 612/QĐ-TTg dated 05/05/2017 of Prime Minister approving the project proposal of “The interconneting road to NH91 and the Long Xuyen City bypass” funded by ADB and the government of Australia. These decisions include: i) Construction of 15.7km Long Xuyen bypass (starting point connects with approach road of Vam Cong bridge from NH80 to Lo Te intersection, ending point at inetersection with NH91); and ii) Construction to upgrade 2km of NH 80 connecting to NH90 to bypass as well as connection to Vam Cong bridge. The new RP based on IOL data was prepared and submitted to ADB in December, 2018.

This 15.7 km project will affect 2 ward/commune of 2 districts of Can Tho city and 8 wards of Long Xuyen city (An Giang province). According to the IOL conducted in May 2017, the upgrading of the 2 km of NH 80 connecting to NH90 to bypass as well as connection to Vam Cong bridge will not affect private land; all construction activities will take place within the existing RoW.

According to the decision to approve the investment project of the Ministry of Transport, the project of constructing the interconnecting road to NH91 and Long Xuyen City bypass is implemented in the form of 2-step design: basic design and construction drawings design (there will not have the detailed design stage). Following to Clause 2, Article 5, Decision No. 883/QĐ-BGTVT on 08 April 2013, the Client is allowed to identify the boundary of ROW as for the 2-step design project based on the approved basic design in the FS. At present, the basic design was approved and CIPM has actively handed over the site clearance landmark to Long Xuyen City People's Committee to implement the DMS in Long Xuyen city (section from Km 8 + 784 to Km 23 + 661). Therefore, an updated Resettlement Plan report based on DMS data is prepared for submission to ADB for approval before compensation payment for this section.Besides, one more updated RP covering LAR impacts in Can Tho city will be prepared and submitted to ADB for approval when the DMS results are availble.

Scope of Land Acquisition and Resettlement: The construction of the section from Km 8 + 784 to Km 23 + 661 (14.8 km) of the Long Xuyen City bypass will affect 457,623 m² of land and assets of 558 households and 2 organizations in Long Xuyen City. of which:

- Affected residential land: 15,810.5 m2

- Affected perennial land: 40,733.3 m2

- Affected annual land and rice fields: 360,649.2 m2

- Affected aquaculture land: 3,295.3 m2

- Land under management of organization (Nam Viet Joint Stock Company): 5,266.7 m2. This area is mainly agricultural land (rice).


Page xii

- Public land area: 37,134.7 m2 managed by 8 commune/ward PCs.

A total of 326 HH will be severely affected, losing more than 10% of their productive land. The project will also affect 83 vulnerable HHs. 140 HHs will need to be relocated including (i) 119 households will be affected fully as their main house will no longer be viable; (ii) 21 households will be acquired the only entire residential land plot and also will be arranged a plot in RS.

Consultation:

During the preparation of this Resettlement Plan (RP), Consultant has conducted 8 public consultation meetings at wards/communes in May 2017. Discussions with relevant departments of Long Xuyen City (Division of Labor, Invalids and Social affairs, Center for Land fund development Women union, Ward/communal people’s committees) were also held. In parallel, Center for Land Fund Development of Long Xuyen City also disseminated compensation policy, compensation price, and resettlement policy to households in September and October 2019.

Through these meetings, information on project, designs, mitigation measures, compensation policies, entitlements, grievance redress mechanism and restoration measures were disclosed to affected households. Grievance Redress Mechanism (GRM): A 4 levels process is set up to address complaints and questions from affected households related to land acquisition, resettlement and compensation as quickly and satisfactorily as possible. The grievance mechanism has been designed to ensure that APs’ concerns and grievances are addressed and resolved in a timely and satisfactory manner. Commune/ward and City People’s Committees are primarily responsible for resolving any grievances received from the AHs. AHs will be free from any fees in connection with the lodging and resolution of complaints.

Legal and Policy Framework: The subproject’s Policy is based on all policies for component 1,2 and 3 of the project as well as the draft RP which was approved by ADB and the Government in 2019, based on the applicable laws and regulations of the Government of Vietnam, An Giang province on land acquisition, compensation, resettlement, rehabilitation and ADB's policy on involuntary resettlement as mentioned in ADB’s Social Safeguard Policy Statement (SPS-2009). If there is any discrepancy between the regulations of the Government of Vietnam and ADB, the ADB rules, policies and procedures will be applied.

Resettlement Arrangements: According to the survey results of DMS, a total of 140 households will need to be relocated. They are eligible to purchase a plot in the resettlement sites of the project or to self-relocate. However, through consultation, all 140 households wish to receive a plot in resettlement area of this project. These HHs will be allocated to the expanded West University Resettlement Site.

Income Restoration and Rehabilitation: Apart from compensation for land and acquired assets, the AHs will be provided with various types of cash assistance for life stabilization as per government laws and regulations. An income restoration program was prepared during which will provide supplemental assistance to severely affected households, enhancing opportunities for them to improve incomes through training and provision of inputs.

Disclosure: Key information in this updated RP has been disclosed to the AHs through public meetings. The updated RP will be disclosed as per disclosure requirements laid out in the ADB’s SPS.

Resettlement Budget: Resettlement Budget: Total cost estimate for the resettlement plan is VND 503,872,582,000 (equivalent to US$ 21,551,000 (exchange rate 1 USD = 23,380 VND). This budget includes estimated cost for implementing the income restoration program.

Monitoring and Reporting: Internal Monitoring is the responsibility of CIPM with the assistance from the Detailed Design and Implementation Support Consultant (DDIS). CIPM


Page xiii

will submit quarterly monitoring reports to ADB. ADB will engage an external monitor consultant (EMC) to provide an independent periodic review. Semi-annual external monitoring reports will be submitted to ADB and CIPM.


Page 1

I. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT

1.1 General

1. The Central Mekong Delta Connectivity Project (CMDCP) aims to improve connectivity in the Mekong Delta Region and provide efficient access from Ho Chi Minh City to the Southern Coastal Region including Can Tho City, Dong Thap and An Giang provinces. Components 1, 2 and 3 of the CMDCP are under construction and includes two bridges to span the Tien Giang and Hau Giang branches of the Mekong River and approximately 28 km of interconnecting highway. 2. The proposed project is part of the Second Southern Highway (SSH) which connects Ho Chi Minh City (HCMC) through the central Mekong Delta region to the Southern Coastal Region, where it joins with the Greater Mekong Sub-region (GMS) Southern Coastal Corridor at Rach Gia. The SSH passes the Tien Giang channel of the Mekong River at Cao Lanh, and the Hau Giang channel of the Mekong River at Vam Cong. 3. Viet Nam is currently experiencing rapid economic growth, based primarily on export processing industries and tourism. According to the General Statistics Office, in 2016, the GDP growth rate was estimated to increase 6.21% compared to 2015. In terms of economic structure in 2016, the agriculture, forestry and fishery sector accounted for 16.32%; The industry and construction sector accounted for 32.72%; Service sector accounted for 40.92%; Product tax minus product subsidies accounted for 10.04% (The corresponding values for these sectors in 2015 was 17.00%, 33.25%, 39.73%, 10.02% respectively). The Mekong Delta region is the third-largest industrial centre in the country after HCMC and Hanoi, and is based primarily on agro-industry and other light industries. Industrial production in the Mekong Delta region has accelerated in recent years, economic growth rate in 2015 increased 7.8%. Road traffic is growing rapidly in Viet Nam and a key constraint to future development is the availability of efficient transport infrastructure with adequate capacity to meet expanding demand. The Government is rapidly upgrading and expanding Viet Nam's strategic transport infrastructure - especially highways, railways, and ports - to support sustained economic growth. 4. The proposed project supports Vietnam Government and ADB strategies to develop rural transport infrastructure to promote sustained, widespread and equitable economic growth in several ways. The SSH runs through the central parts of the Mekong River Delta to the west of, and roughly parallel with, the existing National Highway 1A (NH1A), thereby providing a shortcut for traffic between HCMC, the central Mekong Delta region, and the Southern Coastal Corridor, and connecting the highly productive agro-industries in the central Mekong Delta region with important domestic and regional markets (notably HCMC and Bangkok) and with shipping ports for export. The SSH will help alleviate high and rapidly growing traffic on NH1A, which passes several towns and cities and cannot be widened without very substantial social and economic impact.

1.2 Component 4 - The Interconnecting Road to National Highway No. 91 and the Long Xuyen City Bypass

5. The Interconnecting Road to National Highway No 91 and the Long Xuyen City Bypass are part of the Component 4 of the Central Mekong Delta Region Connectivity Project (hereinafter referred to as the Project). This Project has been approved under Document 1316/BGTVT-KHĐT dated March 10th, 2009 by Ministry of Transport on the Construction investment project to link sections of National Highway 91 and bypass of Long Xuyen City aiming to accelerate the socioeconomic development of the Mekong Delta region in particular and nationwide in general. 6. Component 4 of the CMDCP includes the upgrading of 2 km of National Highway 80 to join NH91 and the Long Xuyen City bypass. The Project start point is located at Provincial Road 921 (equivalent to mark Km 42+055 on National Highway 91) and the end is located at National Highway 91, at Km 65+000. Total length of the road is around 23.6km. It is directly connected to Component 3 and give access to the Vam Cong Bridge currently under


Page 2

construction. We should note that no land acquisition will be necessary for the upgrading of the 2 km of NH80, as all the interventions will be within the existing RoW.

Scope of the Component

7. Only the section from km 7+877 to Km 23+561 (15.7 km) will be funded by ADB and DFAT. The section from Km 0 to Km 6+809 will use other funds and the section from km 6 + 809 to Km 7+877 was built under Component 3 of the CMDCP (Package 3B, see Figure 2).

8. The section funded by ADB/DFAT starts at the road connecting with NH 80 of the interchange with Lo Te road of package CW3B of Component 3 at Km 7+877 and ends at the intersection with NH91 at Km 65+000 - route of NH91 (Km23+561).

9. According to Decision No. 2527/QD-TTg dated November 27, 2016 and Decision No. 612/QD-TTg dated May 5, 2017 of the Prime Minister on approving investment policy; Decision No. 2527/QD-BGTVT by MOT dated on November 22, 2018 on approving the investment project on the construction of the interconnecting road to NH91 and Long Xuyen City bypass funded by ADB/DFAT, including:

- Starting point: at Km7 + 877.13 (according to the overall route of the interconnecting road to NH91 and Long Xuyen City by pass) connects to the approach road from NH80 to Vam Cong bridge; End point: at Km23 + 561.22, the intersection with NH91 at Km65 + 000.

- Route length: about 15.3 Km.

- In addition, upgrading NH80 to connect from NH91 with Long Xuyen bypass, about 2.0 km in length.

10. Investment scope:

- Investing in accordance with the category III delta road standard, the design speed of 80 Km/h; Particularly for the improvement and upgrading of the existing QL80 road, investing in accordance with the category IV delta road standard, the design speed of 60 Km/h (according to TCVN 4054: 2005);

- Scale of the cross-section: 2 lanes, the width of the roadbed is 12m, the width of the road surface Bm = 11m;

- Road pavement: high grade A1, elastic modulus, Eyc≥140 Mpa; - Design frequency: Road foundations, culverts and small bridges P = 4%, big

bridges 1%;

- Bridge: Designed according to TCVN 11823-1: 2017 to TCVN 11823-14: 2017 with a bridge size suitable to the roadbed.

Figure 1. Typical Road Cross Section

11. Source of fund for the project.


Page 3

Total investment of the Project is 90,11 million USD, of which 23,75 million USD is expected for site clearance and compensation. This section will use funds from ADB and DFAT. Land clearance costs will be under the ADB loan.


Page 4

Figure 2. Road connecting NH91 and the bypass road of Long Xuyen city

ROAD SECTION FUNDED UNDER THE CMDCP PROJECT ROAD SECTION FUNDED UNDER OTHER FUNDS COMPO- NENT 3


Page 5

1.3 Administrative Units Affected

12. The scope of land acquisition mentioned in this report belongs to the section from Km 8 + 784 to Km 23 + 661 (section passing Long Xuyen City) of Long Xuyen City bypass. The project will affect 8 commune /wards of Long Xuyen City of An Giang Province.

Table 1: Administrative Units being Affected by the project

Province City Ward/commune

An Giang province

(Km 8+784 ÷ Km 23+611)

Long Xuyen city

My Thanh ward (Km 8+784 ÷ Km 11+359)

My Thoi ward (Km 11+359 ÷ Km 14+376)

My Quy ward (Km 14+376 ÷ Km 15+572)

My Phuoc ward (Km 15+572 ÷ Km 16+728)

My Hoa ward (Km 16+728 ÷ Km 18+034)

My Khanh commune (Km 18+034 ÷ Km 20+139)

Binh Khanh ward (Km 20+139 ÷ Km 20+393)

Binh Duc ward (Km 20+393 ÷ Km 23+611)

1.4 Objectives of the Updated Resettlement Plan

13. The objectives of the updated resettlement plan (uRP), based on DMS data, is to ensure that the subproject will (i) avoid involuntary resettlement wherever possible; (ii) minimize involuntary resettlement by exploring subproject and design alternatives; (iii) enhance, or at least restore, the livelihoods of all displaced persons in real terms relative to pre-subproject levels; and (iv) improve the standards of living of the displaced poor and other vulnerable groups. This uRP covers only the section from km 8+784 to Km 23+561 in Long Xuyen City.

14. This uRP is the guiding document that identifies the key issues to address in reconciling the requirements of ADB’s SPS 2009 on Involuntary Resettlement with national and provincial government policies on compensation, assistance and resettlement. Concerns for involuntary resettlement have been integrated in this document and will govern subproject design, implementation, and monitoring.

1.5 Measures Taken to Reduce Resettlement

15. The first principle in the ADB policy is to avoid or minimize impacts of land acquisition and resettlement.

16. CIPM with support from Consultants and related agencies and departments has made many efforts in minimizing land acquisition impact during the preliminary design phase. In particular, the RoW of the road was minimized and reduced to 25.5 m. In comparison, for components 1, 2 and 3 the RoW was from 50 to 60 m. Densely populated areas were also avoided. Mitigation measures will continue to be considered during detailed design and project implementation following public consultation. Reduction of the RoW will be reconsidered as well as optimization of the alignment All civil works will take place within the acquired RoW.

1.6 Changes Made in the component Scope

17. The component scope changed between the RPs prepared in 2011 and new RP. In 2011, the component scope covered the sections of the Long Xuyen bypass within the administrative boundaries of Thoi Thuan Ward (Can Tho City) from Km 0 to Km 8+250 and


Page 6

Long Xuyen City (An Giang Province) from Km 8+250 to Km 23+5611. The component scope was changed in December 2016 to cover the section from km 7+877 to Km 23+561. The rehabilitation of a section of NH80 to connect to NH91 was also added.

18. The new component scope is based on the documents below: Decision No. 2527/QĐ-TTg dated 27/12/2016 of Prime Minister approving the proposal of the project “The interconnecting road to NH91 and Long Xuyen City bypass road” funded by ADB and Government of Australia.

19. The uRP covers the impacts on land acquisition and resettlement for this new component scope only.

1 This report is also only prepared for impacts within the administrative boundaries of the component scope. The addendum to this RP for impacts outside the administrative boundaries will be prepared and submitted to ADB for approval if needed


Page 7

II. SCOPE OF LAND ACQUISITION AND RESETTLEMENT

2.1 Method of data collection

20. This Updated Resettlement Plan (uRP) identifies the impacts of land acquisition and site clearance for Component 4 of the CMDCP (section from Km 8 + 784 to Km 23 + 661 in Long Xuyen City). Detailed Measurement Survey (DMS) was conducted in May - August, 2019. Based on basic design, list of affected plots and their owners has been prepared from the cadastral map before conducting the DMS. DMS data was collected through in-depth interviews and by using questionnaires with the affected households.

21. DMS documented socioeconomic information from AH, the losses and impacts resulting from the land and non-land assets affected as follows:

- Main socio-economic information of APs/households - number of people in household; number of families that comprise household; gender and age of head of household and household members; tenure of land; education of household members; livelihood activities (paid and unpaid and by number of people in HH participating); cash income (regular, seasonal, non-wage etc); levels of subsistence production; type of dwelling; whether there are people in the household with disability or long-term illness;

- Loss of land - by type of land affected (i.e., residential; agricultural; commercial etc); total area of land (including other plots), area of land affected; tenure of land;

- Loss of assets - by type i.e. structures, crops and trees (type, area affected, number lost etc); time required to rebuild or relocate;

- Loss of, or impact on livelihood activities - type, dependency, level of impact, restoration measures required; and

- Any other impact or losses.

22. Data was entered into a database, and analyzed to establish the profile of AHs and determine the losses and impact in order identify the entitlements and to calculate the compensation. The conditions, needs, and priorities of women were analyzed to ensure that LAR impact do not disadvantage women and other vulnerable group..

2.2 Cut - off date

23. For the Project, the cut-off-date for eligibility for entitlement is defined when PC of An Giang Province will officially issue Notice of Land Acquisition. PC of Long Xuyen City will then inform the public about the Project and its locations. Persons who occupy the project area after the cut-off date will not be eligible to any compensation or assistance. The cut-off-date defined for this Project is on May 25, 2019.

2.3 Scope of Land Acquisition and Resettlement Impacts

2.3.1 Affected households

24. DMS results show that, project implementation will affect 558 households (with 2,219 persons) and 2 organizations. 432 households are being affected through loss of land and 28 households have only grave being affected. In addition, the implementation of the project will affect infrastructures, roads and irrigation network under the management of 8 PCs of ward/commune and 2 companies (Nam Viet joint stock company, Vinaphone Base Transceiver Station). The number of affected households in various categories is presented in the following table:


Page 8

Table 2: Number of Affected Households by the Project

No Ward/commune

Number of affected households No. of affected

organizations (companies)

No. of affected organizations

(wards/commune) Annual

land Perennial land

Aquaculture land

Residential land

No. of affected graves

Total HHs

1 My Thanh 36 11 48 8 5 58 0 1

2 My Thoi 63 6 2 2 4 722 1 1

3 My Quy 27 3 0 2 0 32 0 1

4 My Phuoc 41 14 0 6 2 60 0 1

5 My Hoa 31 31 2 50 4 1503 1 1

6 My Khanh 56 4 1 6 7 75 0 1

7 Binh Khanh 16 3 1 6 2 26 0 1

8 Binh Duc 52 11 1 25 4 87 0 1

Total 322 83 55 105 28 560 2 8

(Source: DMS, 2019)

2 Including 71 households and 1 organization (Nam Viet Joint Stock Company)

3 Including 149 households and 1 organization (Base Transceiver Station Vinaphone)


Page 9

25. Many AHs will lose more than one type of land and non-land assets such as residential land, annual and perennial agricultural land, structures, trees and crops. Out of 558 households affected by house and structures, there are 119 households entirely affected who need to be relocated. The survey results showed that there is no ethnic minority household affected by the component.

26. Number of affected households and organizations are summarized in detailed in the Table below.

Table 3: Summary of impacts magnitude of the Subproject

Contents Unit Qty

1. Number of affected households HHs 558

Household members person 2,219

A. Households are directly affected by land acquisition HHs 432

In which:

+ HHs are affected residential land HHs 105

+ HHs are affected annual land HHs 322 + HHs are affected perennial land HHs 83

+ HHs are affected aquaculture land HHs 55

B. Households are affected by grave HHs 28

2. Number of affected agencies, organizations

Communes/wards People’s Committee 8

Organizations, companies 2

3. HHs are affected house and structure HHs 145

In which:

+ Partially HHs 26 + Fully HHs 119

4. Number of households are affected with trees and crops HHs 151

5. Number of households have to relocate HHs 1404

6. Number of vulnerable households HHs 83

In which:

+ Poor HHs HHs 0

+ Near-poor HHs HHs 3

+ HHs with woman-headed with independents HHs 7 + Policy HHs HHs 1

+ Disabled HHs HHs 8 + Elderly HHs HHs 0

+ Landless HHs HHs 70

4 140 HHs including: 119 HHs are fully affected house and relocated; 21 HHs are acquired the only residential land plot in wards/commne where land is acquired


Page 10

Contents Unit Qty

7. Households are affected 10% or more of total agricultural land area HHs 326

8. Number of households are affected by loss of business HHs 13

(Source: DMS, 2019)

2.3.2 Impacts on Land

27. The construction of the section from Km 8 + 784 to Km 23 + 661 (14.8 km) of the Long Xuyen City bypass will affect 457,623 m² of land and assets of 559 households in Long Xuyen City. of which:

- Affected residential land: 15,810.5 m2

- Affected perennial land: 40,733.3 m2

- Affected annual land and rice fields: 360,649.2 m2

- Affected aquaculture land: 3,295.3 m2

- Land under management of organization (Nam Viet Joint Stock Company): 5,266.7 m2. This area is mainly agricultural land (rice).

- Public land area: 37,134.7 m2 managed by 8 commune/ward PCs

28. Table 4 presents a summary of the impacts on land.


Page 11

Table 4: Summary Land Acquisition (m2)

No Ward/commune

Affected Land Area (m2) Total affected land area

(m2) Annual land

Perennial land

Aquaculture land

Residential land

Traffic land Irrigation

land

1 My Thanh ward 61,996.7 8,130.8 1,624.1 3,134.1 2,960.6 7,754.2 85,600.5

2 My Thoi ward 82,084.0 5,090.6 123.4 979.1 2,351.5 4,225.4 94,854.0

3 My Quy ward 29,240.7 2,006.3 - 88.3 401.8 1,253.7 32,990.8

4 My Phuoc ward 25,012.6 7,865.6 - 953.0 1,080.8 1,750.8 36,662.8

5 My Hoa ward 28,294.2 9,968.6 188.3 3,512.5 2,011.7 1,558.2 45,533.5

6 My Khanh commune 55,037.2 1,802.2 348.4 1,562.9 793.1 4,514.5 64,058.3

7 Binh Khanh ward 17,945.2 896.2 238.1 1,849.4 390.7 583.2 21,902.8

8 Binh Duc ward 61,038.6 4,973.0 773.0 3,731.2 2,660.3 2,844.2 76,020.3

Total 360,649.2 40,733.3 3,295.3 15,810.5 12,650.5 24,484.2 457,623.0

Source: DMS, 2019


Page 12

❖ Impacts on Residential Land

29. The implementation of the component will affect 15,810.5 m2 of residential land owned by 105 households, of which 35 households are partially affected and have viable remaining residential land to rebuild and 70 households are totally affected and will have to relocate.

30. Magnitude of impacts on residential land for each item is presented as follow:

Table 5: Residential Land Acquisition (m2)

No Ward/commune Affected household

Affected area (m2) Partially Fully Total

1 My Thanh 3 5 8 3,134.1

2 My Thoi 0 2 2 979.1

3 My Quy 0 2 2 88.3

4 My Phuoc 1 5 6 953.0

5 My Hoa 16 34 50 3,512.5

6 My Khanh 2 4 6 1,562.9

7 Binh Khanh 5 1 6 1,849.4

8 Binh Duc 8 17 25 3,731.2

Total 35 70 105 15,810.5

(Source: DMS, 2019)

❖ Impacts on agricultural land

31. The component will affect on 404,632.8 m2 of agricultural land held by 398 households, of which 360,649.2 m2 annual land (crop land and rice field land), 40,733.3 m2 perennial land and 3,295.3 m2 aquaculture land.

32. Among 397 households and 1 organization with affected agricultural land, 326 households are severely affected, losing more than 10% of their total productive land and 72 households are marginally affected. For severely affected households, besides compensation and support, they will be entitled to participate in the income restoration program.

33. Among the 397 households and 1 organization being affected through agricultural land, 61 households are affected through loss of house and other structures of which 12 households will have to be relocated. These households are mainly households living on perennial land before 1993 and they are scattered all over the project wards, but mostly in Tay Khanh 5 cluster of My Hoa ward, Long Xuyen city. As per GoV and ADB regulations, they will be entitled to full compensation.

Table 6: Summary of affected agricultural land

No Ward/commune

Affected household (HH)

Affected area (m2) < 10% total land holding

≥ 10% total land holding

Total

1 My Thanh 7 38 45 71,751.6

2 My Thoi 18 51 69 87,298.0


Page 13

No Ward/commune

Affected household (HH)

Affected area (m2) < 10% total land holding

≥ 10% total land holding

Total

3 My Quy 4 24 28 31,247.0

4 My Phuoc 7 45 52 32,878.2

5 My Hoa 4 57 61 38,406.1

6 My Khanh 11 50 61 57,187.8

7 Binh Khanh 7 10 17 19,079.5

8 Binh Duc 14 51 65 66,784.6

Total 72 326 398 404,632.8

(Source: DMS, 2019)

❖ Impacts on aquaculture land

34. The implementation of the component will affect aquaculture land of 10 households and 1 organization, of which: 4 HHs in My Thanh ward, 1 HH and 1 organization in My Thoi ward, 2 HHs in My Hoa ward, 1 HH in My Khanh commune, 1 HH in Binh Khanh ward and 1 HH in Binh Duc ward. Total affected aquacultural land is 3,295.3 m2.

❖ Impacts on land under management of organization

35. The implementation of the component will affect the land of one organization: Nam Viet Joint Stock Company will lose 5,266.7 m2 of paddy in My Thoi ward (Long Xuyen City). This Company is specialized in food production and has 100 to 300 employees). The company will also continue to operate. No impact on workers is anticipated for this company.

2.3.3 Land Tenure

36. 98.4% of AHs have LURC and 1.6% of AHs do not have LURC but are eligible for legalization and full compensation.

Table 7: Land tenure status

No Ward/commune Number of

households affected land

Legal status

Have LURC No LURCs but eligible

to legalize

1 My Thanh 47 46 1

2 My Thoi 71 70 1

3 My Quy 30 30 0

4 My Phuoc 52 51 1

5 My Hoa 62 60 2

6 My Khanh 63 61 2

7 Binh Khanh 22 22 0

8 Binh Duc 85 85 0

Total 432 425 7

(Source: DMS, 2019)


Page 14

2.3.4 Impacts on Houses and other Structures

37. According to the DMS results, there are 145 households affected through main house and secondary structures. Of which, 26 households are partially affected and 119 households have their main house and other structures such as secondary structures, toilets, kitchens, yards, fencing walls and sheds totally affected. Among the 1195 households who have to relocate: (i) 51 HHs are affected residential land and house; (ii) 12 HHs built house on agricultural land; 56 landless HHs built their houses on other’s land. HHs built houses on agricultural land are mainly living on perennial crop land before 1993 and they are scattered all over the project wards, but mostly in Tay Khanh 5 cluster of My Hoa ward, Long Xuyen city. The summary on the type of affected houses and structures affected under the project is shown in the following Table 8.

2.3.5 Impacts on graves

38. The results of DMS show that the component implementation will affect 101 graves owned by 28 households in 7 commune/wards: My Thanh, My Thoi, My Phuoc, My Hoa, My Khanh, Binh Khanh and Binh Duc. The results of consultations with local authorities and households showed that they HH with graves affected support the project and accept to move their graves in existing graveyards.

2.3.6 Impacts on trees and crops

39. According to the results of DMS, the implementation of the component will affect crops and trees of 151 households6. In summary, there will be 6,975 fruit trees (star apple trees, grapefruit, banana…), 5,799 timber trees, 1,177 bonsai trees being affected by the project. Summary of affected crops and trees is presented in Table 9.

5 In addition, 21 households are acquired the only residential land plot and also be arranged plot in RS.

6 For rice and crop: it is not affected due to informing the households that the household has 3 months to harvest and only recover the ground when the household has finished harvesting.


Page 15

Table 8: Summary of affected Houses and Structure Works

No Ward/commune

AHs affected house Area of affected

house (m2) Quantity of affected structure

Grave (each)

Partially Fully Total Class 5 house

(temporary)

Class 4 house

Shed (m2)

Kitchen (m2)

Toilet (m2)

Wall (m2)

Fence rào (m)

Yard (m2)

1 My Thanh 1 10 11 190.91 272.31 26.73 80.1 15.11 0 46.11 160.04 10

2 My Thoi 1 3 4 62.40 259.40 5.13 7.8 9.29 23.2 235.03 192.7 9

3 My Quy 1 3 4 - 212.15 85.12 28.98 3 0 308.35 102.18 0

4 My Phuoc 0 11 11 33.88 620.60 86.17 43.7 13.7 11.18 939.28 349 2

5 My Hoa 15 62 77 230.09 3,021.50 179.48 115.24 53.21 15.55 356.48 579.69 24

6 My Khanh 1 8 9 153.50 403.18 57.5 57.6 7 17.3 785.48 17.5 38

7 Binh Khanh 1 10 11 105.40 298.95 371 11.37 12.3 0 183.84 305.97 5

8 Binh Duc 6 12 18 - 1,403.62 75.4 116.8 25.1 92.5 805.17 399.06 13

Total 26 119 145 776.18 6,491.71 886.53 461.59 138.71 159.73 3,659.74 2,106.14 101

Source: DMS, 2019


Page 16

Table 9: Summary on affected trees and crops

No Ward/commune Affected

HHs

Impacts on trees

Fruit tree Timber

tree Bonsai

tree

1 My Thanh 31 1,404 1,108 380

2 My Thoi 13 550 388 28

3 My Quy 6 730 334 75

4 My Phuoc 26 1,095 1,773 131

5 My Hoa 42 1,925 1,197 382

6 My Khanh 8 532 538 90

7 Binh Khanh 7 95 59 5

8 Binh Duc 18 644 402 86

Total 151 6,975 5,799 1,177

Source: DMS, 2019

2.3.7 Impacts on Businesses

40. Results of the DMS show that, among 558 households and 1 organization being affected by land acquisition, 13 households businesses and 1 organization is businesses (Nam Viet joint stock company). This organization will not have to relocate. Among the 13 household businesses, 2 are registered while the other 11 household businesses do not have business registration licenses. These non-registered businesses are small stores and catering services. All the 13 households businesses (home-based businesses) will have to relocate. Impacts on businesses in the project area are presented in the following table:

Table 10: Impacts on Affected Businesses

No Ward/commune HHs

Businesses Activity (HH) Registration (HH)

Catering service

Foods Trading Other Registered None

1 My Thanh 0

2 My Thoi 0

3 My Quy 1 1 1

4 My Phuoc 1 1 1

5 My Hoa 4 3 1 4

6 My Khanh 2 2 2

7 Binh Khanh 1 1 1

8 Binh Duc 4 2 2 2 2

Total 13 3 0 4 6 2 11

(Source: DMS, 2019)


Page 17

2.3.8 Vulnerable households

41. The results of the DMS and consultations with local authorities in the component area showed that, there are 83 vulnerable households, in which landless HHs account for the majority with 70 households. No ethnic minority HH was found among the surveyed HH. The information on vulnerable household’s groups in the component area is shown in the table below:

Table 11: Information about vulnerable households in the project area

No Ward/

commune

Vulnerable HH

Total Poor HH

Near-poor HH

Women-headed HH

with dependents

Policy HH

Disabled HH

Elderly HH

Landless HH

1 My Thanh 1 7 7

2 My Thoi 2 1 3

3 My Quy 3 3

4 My Phuoc 7 7

5 My Hoa 0 2 2 1 2 0 44 46

6 My Khanh 4 6 10

7 Binh Khanh 2 4 6

8 Binh Duc 1 1

Total 0 3 7 1 8 0 70 83

Source: Certification by PC of ward/commune, 2019

42. Out of 83 vulnerable households, 11 households are severely affected due to loss of 10% or more of total agricultural landholdings, 65 households are affected in housing and structures, requiring relocation, mainly in Tay Khanh 5 cluster of My Hoa ward; 7 remaining households are marginally affected due to loss of less than 10% of total agricultural landholdings.

2.3.9 Impacts on infrastructures

43. According to results of the DMS, in addition to impacts on land and property of households, the component implementation will also affect the Base Transceiver Station Vinaphone in My Hoa ward, Long Xuyen city..

44. The Base Transceiver Station Vinaphone will be affected: 40 m2 1 floor house, 50 m2 wall, 25 m2 yard and the Broadcasting tower with a height of 42 m.

2.3.10 Temporary Impacts during the Construction Process

45. The component will also temporarily affect agricultural land owned by 53 households and public land managed by 8 communes/ward with total temporarily affected land area of 28,367 m2, of which affected agricultural land area is 6,760 m2, public land area is 21,607 m2. Temporary impacts are due to the need for material storage sites along the project during the construction period.

46. These impacts will be confirmed during construction and compensation/assistance will be provided based on the provision of this uRP.


Page 18

III. SOCIO-ECONOMIC INFORMATION AND PROFILE

3.1 Introduction

47. The objective of the SES is to establish baseline data on the socio- economic status of affected HH in the project area, to identify issues related to compensation, site clearance and to provide the basis for assessing and monitoring the ability to recover living conditions of affected households after site clearance.

48. The socioeconomic information in the project areas (i.e. population size, religion, education, employment, income and expenditure of HHs) was collected from secondary sources such as reports and statistics from relevant agencies. Data on affected households were collected through questionnaires, community consultations and interviews.

3.2 Survey Approaches and Methodologies

49. The methodologies used to collect socio-economic information include:

50. Desk review

- The Consultant collected, reviewed, studied and analyzed/assessed the documents relating to compensation, assistance and resettlement of the Project. Those documents were collected at CIPM, CLFD of Long Xuyen City, the PCs of project wards, including: (i) Project documents (Statement and Design Drawings of project work items; Resettlement Policy Framework, etc.); (ii) Cadastral maps, copies of maps and Socio-economic reports provided by commune/ward PCs; (iii) Relevant policies of the ADB, the Government of Vietnam, An Giang PPC with aim to (1) find out procedures, regulations proposed and approved from the project documents, (2) find out technical methods proposed for each Project component; (3) review socio - economic reports of localities, (4) propose mitigation measures and guidelines for follow-up actions.

51. Qualitative research method

- Consultation and discussion with various stakeholders, including: affected households (such as severely affected households, relocated households and vulnerable households), the implementation agencies, social organizations, representatives of leaders of local authorities through consultation meetings, in-depth interviews and group discussions.

52. Quantitative research method.

- During the period from 01/05/2017 to 30/05/2017, socio-economic survey and IOL survey were conducted for HH affected by land/non-land assets in 08 wards/commune of Long Xuyen city. Subsequently, during the period from November 20, 2019 to December 16, 2019, the Consultant continued to survey and update the socio-economic information of the affected households.

- Socio-Economic Survey (SES) by questionnaire covered over 55,5% of the total affected households; including: (i) 37,1% affected households (by losing from more than 10% of total agricultural land holding); (ii) 89,9% of relocated households and (iii) 60,7% of vulnerable households (woman-headed households, poor households, households with the elderly and so on). As result, a total of 309 households have been surveyed through questionnaire in the project area. SES sample for affected households is presented in Table 13.

53. Entering and processing data. Information collected from the field visit was processed by specialized software such as SPSS (Quantitative) and NVIVO (Qualitative).


Page 19

54. The following pages present summarized results, including socio-economic information of the project city and information on households affected by the project.

3.3 Socio-Economic Information on Long Xuyen City

55. Long Xuyen City , the capital of An Giang Province, is located on the right bank of Hau River, located in the center of the Mekong Delta (MD). The geographical coordinates of the city are: 10 ° 22'22 "N - 105 ° 25'33" the city is bounded by the following four administrative units:

- In the north: adjacent to Chau Thanh District.

- In the South: adjacent to Thot Not District - Can Tho City and Lap Vo District - Dong Thap Province.

- In the east: Hau River and Cho Moi district.

- In the West: adjacent to Thoai Son district.

56. Long Xuyen city is located along the urban and economic corridor between Vietnam and Cambodia: HCMC Highway - Can Tho City - Phnom Penh City, NH91 and Hau River-N2 road. This gives Long Xuyen City a strategic position along national and international roads and waterways

57. In 1999, Long Xuyen City officially became part of An Giang province. In 2009, the Government of Vietnam has recognized the city of Long Xuyen as a grade II City under An Giang province. Currently, the city of Long Xuyen has 13 administrative units (11 wards, 2 communes) with an area of 115.36 km2 .

❖ Population and labor:

58. Population in 2018 was 286,638 people (rural population was 33,584 and urban population was 253,054). The rate of natural population growth was 9,40‰ in 2018. The population density is 2,485 people/km2. The population in working age in 2018 was 204,529 people (105,480 men and 99,049 women), accounting for 71.4% of the total population. The average number of employees in the state sector of the city in 2018 was 5,808 people, including 1,127 people at the central management level and 4,681 people at the local management level.

Table 12: Scale of area, population number and population density in Long Xuyen

No Commune/ward Area (km2) Population number Density

(person/km2) Total Male Female

1 My Binh Ward 1.616 18,546 8,948 9,598 11,478

2 My Long Ward 1.235 21,024 10,121 10,903 17,019

3 Dong Xuyen Ward 1.202 14,667 7,166 7,501 12,200

4 My Xuyen Ward 0.610 13,748 6,709 7,039 22,530

5 Binh Duc Ward 11.615 21,234 10,568 10,666 1,828

6 Binh Khanh Ward 6.684 30,418 14,753 15,665 4,551

7 My Phuoc Ward 4.296 32,589 15,662 16,927 7,578

8 My Quy Ward 4.178 13,740 6,750 6,999 3,289

9 My Thoi Ward 21.388 26,033 12761 13,272 1,217

10 My Thanh Ward 15.472 27,797 13,618 14,179 1,797

11 My Hoa Ward 16.291 33,258 16,456 16,802 2,042

12 My Khanh Commune 9.585 11,604 5,787 5,817 1,211


Page 20

No Commune/ward Area (km2) Population number Density

(person/km2) Total Male Female

13 My Hoa Hung Commune 21.193 21,980 10,948 11,032 1,037

Total 115.36 286,638 140,249 146,389 2,485

(Source: PFS 2018)

❖ Economic Development Situation

59. The economic growth of Long Xuyen city has been quite stable in recent years. Total retail sales of goods in 2018 reached VND 14,203 billion, an increase of 11.24% compared to the same period last year; revenue from accommodation and catering services increased by 14.33% compared to 2017. In 2018, the industrial sector accounted for 80.7%, the construction sector accounted for 12.2%, the agricultural sector accounted for 7.1 %. The production value of all industries increased: (i) The production value of industry - handicraft in 2018 reached VND 18,343 billion, an increase of 9.04% compared to 2017; (ii) Agricultural production value in 2018 reached VND 1,655 billion, up 3.96% compared to 2017; (iii) The value of construction production in 2018 increased by 10.96% compared to 2017.

❖ Poor household:

60. In 2018, poor households was 145 households (accounting for 0.19%), near-poor households was 2,295 households (accounting for 3.06%). Most of the poor and near-poor households are concentrated in the areas where infrastructures are in a poor condition (low income areas or areas along the rivers and canals).

❖ Ethnic Situation

61. At the end of 2018, most of the people in Long Xuyen City were Kinh accounting for 283,772 people, (99%); the Chinese account for 0.73%; the Khmer account for 0.2%, and others represent 0.07%. The ethnic minority households are scattered across residential areas and are fully integrated with the Kinh majority

3.4 Socio-Economic Information of Affected Households

3.4.1 Survey Scope

62. The project will affect 559 households. SES was carried out from November 20, 2019 to December 16, 2019, among 309 households out of total 558 affected households (accounting for 55.3% out of total affected households). Among the 309 respondents, 110 respondents were women (35.6%), and 199 respondents were male (64.4%). Detailed data on surveyed scope for commune/wards of the project are shown in the Table as follow:

Table 13: Socio-Economic Survey Scope in the Project area

No Commune/ward Relocated

households

Households are affected 10% or

more of agricultural land area

Households are directly

affected business

Vulnerable households

Total

1 My Thanh 10 19 - 6 35

2 My Thoi 3 18 - 3 24

3 My Quy 2 8 1 3 14

4 My Phuoc 10 19 1 5 35

5 My Hoa 65 26 4 22 117

6 My Khanh 8 21 2 6 37

7 Binh Khanh 9 4 - 5 18


Page 21

No Commune/ward Relocated

households

Households are affected 10% or

more of agricultural land area

Households are directly

affected business

Vulnerable households

Total

8 Binh Duc 18 6 4 1 29

Total 125 121 12 51 309

Source: SES Survey, 2019

(Note: A household can be the household affected with business, relocated household or/and vulnerable household at the same time.)

63. Among 309 surveyed households, 125 households are affected with residential land and have to relocate; 121 households are losing more than 10% of total agricultural land area; 12 households are affected by loss of business due to land acquisition, 51 households are vulnerable households.

3.4.2 Characteristics of Household Members

64. According to survey data, the majority of households consists of 3 to 5 members (accounting for 63,7%), followed by households with 6 - 9 members, accounting for 24,7% and households with 1 to 2 members, accounting for only 11,6%. On average, each AH household in the project area has 4.5 persons/household and the average main number of laborers per household is 2.1 persons.

3.4.3 Education level

65. According to survey data, percentage of household heads with primary school degree accounts for 44.7%, only 20,7% of households heads graduated from high school; 27,5% of household heads graduated from secondary school, only 3,2% of household heads graduated from college/university. Meanwhile, the rate of illiteracy/non-attendance is 3.9%. In general, the level of education of affected households in the project area is not high, due to difficult economic situation and lack of local infrastructure.

Table 14: Education level of household heads

No. Education level of household heads Numbers (people) Rate (%)

1 Illiteracy 12 3.9%

2 Primary school 138 44.7%

3 Secondary school 85 27.5%

4 High school 64 20.7%

5 College/University 10 3.2%

Total 309

Source: SES, 2019

3.4.4 Occupation of Household Heads

66. The survey results showed that the main source of income for affected households in the affected communes is mainly based on agricultural production activities, including afforestation, growing rice and livestock and so on. Agricultural production is a great determinant of the stability and well-being of the household. Among the 309 AHs surveyed, 186 (60.1%) rely on agriculture activities; 69 affected households are workers, 22.3% are self-employed workers, 3.5% are engaged in trading and 4.5% are civil servants, officials. Occupations of affected households in the project area are shown in the Table below.


Page 22

Table 15: Occupation of household heads divided into each commune/ward

No Commune/ward

Occupation

Total Agriculture

Civil

servant Business Retired

Self-

employed

House-

wife Others

1 My Thanh 25 3 0 2 6 0 0 35

2 My Thoi 22 1 1 0 1 0 0 24

3 My Quy 10 0 0 1 3 0 0 14

4 My Phuoc 24 3 0 3 6 0 0 35

5 My Hoa 62 4 8 8 27 3 4 117

6 My Khanh 19 2 0 2 13 0 0 37

7 Binh Khanh 11 0 0 2 6 0 0 18

8 Binh Duc 14 1 2 3 7 1 1 29

Total 186 14 11 21 69 4 5 309

Rate (%) 60,1% 4,5% 3,5% 6,8% 22,3% 1,2% 1,5%

Source: SES, 2019

3.4.5 Income level and Expenditures

67. According to the socio-economic survey results, most of the affected households belong to the low income group of 1.3 - 2 million VND/person/month (accounting for 35.3%). It is followed by the income level of over 2 million VND/person/month (26.7%); the percentage of households with incomes below 1.3 million VND/person/month accounts for 38%; these are mainly the poor, near-poor and single-elderly person households…

68. The survey results also showed that the average income of the affected households in the project area is about 74.5 million dong/household/year. According to the average size of 4.5 people/household, the average income of each person will be about 1,370,000 VND/month or higher. However, there are significant differences among the project areas. Households in My Khanh, Binh Khanh and Binh Duc wards of Long Xuyen city have average income level higher than households in other wards. The figures are detailed in Table 17.

Table 16: Average income/person/month

STT Commune/

ward

Less than 900,000 dong

900,000 VND - 1.3 M dong

1.3 - 2 M dong

More than 2 M dong

Total

HH (%) HH (%) HH (%) HH (%) HH (%)

1 My Thanh 5 14.6% 8 22.0% 13 36.6% 9 26.8% 35 100%

2 My Thoi 6 23.3% 4 16.7% 9 36.7% 6 23.3% 24 100%

3 My Quy 5 36.4% 3 18.2% 5 36.4% 1 9.1% 14 100%

4 My Phuoc 7 20.0% 3 8.0% 15 44.0% 10 28.0% 35 100%

5 My Hoa 17 14.8% 33 27.8% 39 33.0% 28 24.3% 117 100%

6 My Khanh 4 9.7% 6 16.1% 16 41.9% 12 32.3% 37 100%

7 Binh Khanh 3 16.7% 6 33.3% 2 8.3% 8 41.7% 18 100%

8 Binh Duc 4 13.6% 5 18.2% 11 38.6% 9 29.5% 29 100%

Total 51 16.4% 67 21.6% 109 35.3% 83 26.7% 309 100%

Source: SES, 2019


Page 23

❖ Expenditures

69. According to the survey results, the highest expenditure of households ranges from 40- 65 million VND/HH/year (accounting for 46.55%); it is followed by the expenditure of over 65 million VND/HH/year (accounting for 22.9%); the expenditure of 15 - 35 million dong/HH/year accounts for 29.7%, only 0.85% of households spends less than 15 million VND/HH/year. With such income and expenditure, thus most of the surveyed households said they have no savings.

3.4.6 Living standards and living facilities of households

❖ Living standard

70. Based on the poverty line under the MOLISA7 standard, in rural area, households to be identified as poor households need to meet 1 out of 2 criteria as follow: (i) monthly income per capita is less than 700,000 VND, (ii) monthly income per capita is from more than 700,000 VND to 1,000,000 VND and deficiency of 03 measurement indicators with deficiency level in access to basic social services. Near-poor households in rural area have monthly income per capita of over 700,000 VND to 1,000,000 VND and less deficiency of 03 measurement indicators with deficiency level in access to basic social services. The average income level of household is over 1,000,000 VND to 1,500,000 VND/person/month; Better-off households (including better-off and rich households) have income level of over 1,500,000 VND/person/month.

71. The poor households in urban areas are those who meet out of 2 criteria: i) the per capita income per month of enough 900,000 dong or below; the per capita income per month of over 900,000 dong to 1.3 million dong and 2) lack of 03 indicators measuring the degree of limited access to basic social services or higher. The near-poor households in urban areas are those who have per capita income per month of over 900,000 dong to 1.3 million dong and lack of less than 3 indicators measuring the limited access to basic social services; Their average income is over 1,300,000 to 1,950,000 dong/person/month; Better-off households (including better-off and rich households) have income of above 1,950,000 dong/person/month.

72. According to these criteria, out of total 309 surveyed households, there are 119 households (38.5%) belonging to the average income group, 76 households (24.6%) belonging to better-off group, 65 households (21%) belonging to low level group, and 49 belonging to the poor and near- poor households (15.9%).

73. The self-assessment results of economic condition of the surveyed households showed that 185 households (59.9%) self-assessed they have an average income; 67 households (21.7%) self-assessed they have good income and 57 households (18.4%) rated themselves as poor and near-poor households. As reported during in-depth interviews and meetings with DOLISA, the causes of poverty in the project area are due to: i) lack of productive land; ii) lack of capital for productive purpose; iii) lack of experience/skill in production; iv) unemployment; v) lack of labour and vi) HH with sick family members. Income restoration program considered causes of poverty and included vocational training and credit loan support.

❖ Living facilities

74. The value of assets in each household depends much on their economic conditions. For assets which are the essential items and the less valuable assets are commonly seen in the households with average living standard, whereas the households of the better-off group usually use the valuable assets. Color television can be seen as the common mass media. There are up to 96.1% of households owning color television, 93.5% owning telephone; 91.6% owning motorcycles; etc. The status of using household assets is detailed in the table

7According to Decision No. 59/2015/QĐ-TTg, dated 19/11/2015, promulgating multidimensional poverty levels applicable during 2016-2020.


Page 24

below:

Table 17: Living facilities of household

No. Living facilities Number of HHs Rate %

1 Luxury wooden furniture 128 41.4%

2 Motorbike 283 91.6%

3 Bicycle 269 87.1%

4 Radio 19 6.1%

5 Color television 297 96.1%

6 Refrigerator 229 74.1%

7 Washing machine 56 18.1%

8 Telephone 289 93.5%

9 Air conditioner 78 25.2%

10 Car 10 3.2%

Source: SES, 2019

3.4.7 Land Tenure

75. Through the survey of land use rights, 98.4% of households have land use rights certificates; 1.6% of remaining households do not have land use right certificates. They are mainly HH occupying land before 1993 and are entitled to full compensation as per GoV and ADB policies.

3.4.8 Utilities and services

76. Electricity: As a result of consultations, 100% of the surveyed households use the national power grid with separate meters, the average electrical expenditure of each household is about 225,000 dong/month.

77. Clean water: In the project area, no household is found to use water from ponds, rivers or lakes for their daily domestic demands. 3 main water resources used by households include tap water (accounting for 93.5%), dug well water (accounting for 4.4%), drilled well water (accounting for 2.1%).

78. Toilets: 100% of households have hygienic toilets. The majority of households have used composting toilets, which accounts for about 62.1%; 37.9% of households are using double-vault toilets. There are not any households using public toilet or having no toilet.

79. Waste collection: Currently, 100% of communes, wards in the project area have formed a waste collection system, and this operation is implemented quite effectively with waste collection frequency of 1-3 times per week.

3.4.9 Health and education

80. Health: in the surveyed area, many households said that they take medical examination every six months or once a year. In case of diseases, they usually get treatment at General Hospital of the Province/city (40.6%), self-buying medicine (59.4%). In addition, they also use other medical services such as health centers of district, clinics in wards, etc. Besides, under the program of the whole city, the population and family planning work in wards and communes is also implemented uniformly.

81. Education: In the project area, kindergartens and primary schools have been built. 100% of the households within the surveyed area have been provided with primary education.


Page 25

3.4.10 Gender issues in the area

❖ Gender of surveyed persons

82. Previously, in Vietnam families, women are not often bread-winner of the family, their works are mainly domestic activities, fewer women are involved in social work. Currently, Vietnam society has made profound changes, in addition being charge in work in families such as housewife, house cleaning, taking care of children ... women also participated actively in social activities. Thus, opinion of women in participating in interview responding is essential.

83. According to the socio-economic survey results for the affected households, the participation rate of women respondents accounted for a relatively high proportion, out of total 309 respondents: 110 respondents were women (accounting for 35.6%), 199 respondents were male (accounting for 64.4%) which ensures gender equality and representation of collected information.

❖ Participation in community activities

84. According to the public consultation held in communes and wards of the project area in May 2017, both genders joined and expressed their concerns. Men usually join both two activities more than women, however, the difference is not significant. Among 238 participants, there are 133 men (accounting for 55.8%) and 105 women (accounting for 44.2%.

Table 18: Participation in community activities

Content Number of participant

Rate

Participating in community activities: community meetings,

Male 133 55.8%

Female 105 44.2%

Total 238 100%

Source: SES, May/2017

❖ Women head of HH

85. A total of 7 women are head of households with dependents. They are considered as vulnerable households and will be entitled to specific allowance and support.

❖ Gender Strategy

86. The gender strategy is founded on the recognition that men and women often experience the impacts of land acquisition and resettlement in different forms and to different extents by nature of their gendered roles in society. Women tend to bear greater burdens in loss of livelihood and disruption to social networks which are not only vital for their own sense of empowerment and value within their communities but also for the wellbeing of their households. Similarly, the burdens associated with relocation of households tend to be borne disproportionally by women than by men. As such the resettlement plan needs to adopt a gender strategy and specific measures to ensure that impacts on women are recognized, understood and addressed. The following actions will be taken during uRP implementation:

a) Income restoration activities will be planned based on detailed needs assessment taking into consideration the impacts and needs of both men and women. Such planning will be based in part on separate consultations with women and be cognizant of women’s differing labour patterns, preferences and their typical need to simultaneously fulfill various roles in productive labour as well as domestic sphere.

b) Compensation payments and cash assistance will be provided jointly in the name of husband and wife.


Page 26

c) For landless AHs who will be offered to buy a plot at the relocation site, new land use rights certificates as well as titles to any new assets assigned as part of the resettlement compensation and assistance measures will be issued jointly in the name of husband and wife.

d) If the land has been acquired or inherited by the man or woman prior to marriage, the land title or land use right certificate will be registered in the name of that person. Said owner has the right and the option to register the land either as a conjugal property, i.e., issued jointly in the name of husband and wife or to any other person he or she chooses.

e) Lot allocation, design of houses and development of social infrastructure, will include separate consultation with women AHs. Special measures will be taken in the relocation of women with special needs such as elderly and female-headed households to enable co-location with others within their social support networks such as extended family and friends.

f) Gender disaggregated monitoring indicators will be developed for monitoring resettlement activities, socio-economic conditions (including impacts and benefits), and livelihood restoration


Page 27

IV. INFORMATION, CONSULTATION AND PUBLIC DISCLOSURE

4.1 Information dissemination

4.1.1 Information dissemination and consultation during RP preparation (PPTA stage)

87. During RP preparation at the PPTA stage, two consultations have been organized with institutional stakeholders, including local authorities, social organizations, EAs/IAs in May 2010 and 8 consultation meetings with affected people (from 5 to 16 July 2010). Results of the consultations have been summarized and reflected in the 2011 RP.

4.1.2 Information dissemination and consultation during RP updating

88. During the update of the resettlement plan, local authorities, communities and affected families were extensively consulted, focusing on information and impacts of the project. All policies regarding land acquisition, compensation, support and resettlement of the project had been disclosed to all affected households. From September 21, 2019 to October 11, 2019, a draft plan for compensation, assistance and resettlement was posted in 8 communes/wards.

4.2 Public consultation

89. Information dissemination and consultation with affected persons and involved agencies will reduce the potential for conflicts and minimize the risk of Project delays. Furthermore, this approach will enable the Project to design the resettlement and rehabilitation program so that it meets the needs and priorities of the affected people, and in this way, potentially maximizing the economic and social benefits of the investment. The objectives of the public information campaign and the consultation program are as follows:

- To fully share information with the AHs about the proposed project components and activities;

- To obtain information about the needs and priorities of the AHs, as well as information about their reactions to proposed policies and activities;

- To ensure that AHs are enabled to make fully informed decisions that will directly affect their incomes and quality of life, and that they will have the opportunity to participate in activities and decision-making about issues that will have a direct effect upon them;

- To obtain the maximum level of co-operation and participation of the AHs and communities in activities necessary for resettlement planning and implementation;

- To ensure transparency in all activities related to land acquisition, compensation, resettlement and rehabilitation.

90. In early May 2017, Consultant team and representatives of the project owner organized 10 public consultation meetings in the project area to provide information and identify concerns of households in the project area. A total of 238 APs (133 males and 105 females) attended these meetings. Consultant also organized in-depth interviews with 58 households most of which are significantly affected by the project and have to be relocated. Time, location and number of households participating in the public consultation meeting are presented in details in Table 19. Concerns and comments of participants of the public meetings are shown in Table 20.

91. From October 28, 2019 to November 1, 2019, Long Xuyen City People's Committee held a dialogue with households on the draft compensation plan. Results of the dialogue were: 319 households (accounting for 57%) agreed with the draft compensation plan, 46 households (accounting for 8%) were invited to the dialogue but did not attend and had no comments; 192 households (34%) agreed with the policy of land acquisition but asked to review the compensation price for land, houses, structure, support for land leveling, recover


Page 28

the remaining land, ask to be allocated a plot in RS,…

92. Based on the recommendations of households through dialogue, from November 4, 2019 to November 8, 2019, CLFD of Long Xuyen City held meetings with relevant agencies and PC of wards/commune to check, review and discuss measures to address these recommendations.

93. From November 18, 2019 to November 26, 2019, Long Xuyen City People's Committee continued to have dialogues with households. Accordingly, 435 households (accounting for 78%) agreed with the draft compensation plan, 30 households (accounting for 5%) were invited but did not attend; and the remaining 92 households (accounting for 16.5%) agreed with the policy of land acquisition but asked to reconsider compensation prices for land, houses, structure, support for land leveling, recover the remaining land, ask to be allocated a plot in RS,…

94. Detailed information about local dialogues with households on the draft compensation plan is presented in Table 21.

4.3 Information Disclosure

95. After approved by ADB, this uRP will be uploaded on the ADB website and the Vietnamese version will be released to AHs. The copies of uRP will be disclosed in the at commune/ward People’s Committee.


Page 29

Table 19: Public Consultation on Land Acquisition and Resettlement

No Place Date No. of participants

Participant Contents Male Female

1 My Thanh 18/05 16 15 - Representatives of local authorities and unions: Farmer association, Women’s Union, Fatherland Front, Youth’s Union, etc.

- Representatives of affected households of project

- Representatives of CIPM - Representatives of Consultant

- Introduction about the project (objectives, locations, scale and plan of the project, etc.);

- Policies related to compensation, support and site clearance/resettlement of GoV, ADB and the Project.

- Public consultation about resettlement issues and options to arrange resettlement for displaced HHs;

2 My Thoi 29/05 15 14

3 My Quy 19/05 8 9

4 My Phuoc 26/05 18 11

5 My Hoa 29/05 18 14

6 My Khanh 20/05 10 7

7 Binh Khanh 18/05 9 8

8 Binh Duc 30/05 14 11

TOTAL 133 105


Page 30

Table 20: Results of Public Consultation Meetings

No Ward Public opinions Feedback from the Project Agreed Actions

1 My Thanh - Local authorities and people support the project implementation

- It is necessary to inform about the compensation policy for AHs and the resettlement site for displaced households.

- There should be fair compensation and assistance policy for AHs, especially displaced households.

- How to calculate land price for compensation?

- Will the ditch being affected by the project construction be re-built?

- What will be solution for the residual vacant land?

- Prior to conducting work at project area, the project implementation unit will send a notification as well as a detailed work implementation plan to local authorities.

- In addition to compensation for land and assets on land, AHs will receive additional support such as subsistence, job change, transport allowance and so on..

- An independent valuer will establish the compensation rates at market rates and will submit these rates to the An Giang PPC;

- All the infrastructures including irrigation canals and ditches will be maintained or rebuilt.

- If the land is no more viable as per PC policy, it will be entirely acquired by the project;

Local authorities and people support the project implementation

2 My Thoi - Local authorities and people support the project implementation


- There should be fair compensation

and assistance policy for AHs,



- Relocated HH will receive special allowance and assistance;



Page 31


especially displaced households.

3 My Quy - Local authorities and people support the project implementation


- There should be fair compensation and assistance policy for AHs, especially displaced households.



- Relocated HH will receive special allowance and assistance;


4 My Phuoc - Local authorities and people support the project implementation


- There should be fair compensation and assistance policy for AHs.

- People want to be relocated near their former place

- For partially affected households of which the remaining residential land is not sufficient to build house, what will they get for compensation?

- Will there be any support for changing land use purpose from cultivation land to residential land?

- Want to have job for stable life.


- Displaced households in My Phuoc ward are expected to be arranged relocation in the resettlement area in the west of An Giang university close to the affected areas;

- For partially affected households of which the remain residential land is not sufficient to build house, project will compensate with value of the full house.

- This will be decided case by case in coordination with local authorities;

- An Income Restoration Program will be implemented;



Page 32


5 My Hoa - Local authorities and people support the project implementation

- It is necessary to inform the plan and progress of the project implementation so that AHs are informed and arrange their accommodation because in the design, there will be over 100 households in Tay Khanh 5 cluster to be displaced and require resettlement.


- There should be fair compensation and assistance policy for AHs.

- For partially affected households of which the remaining residential land is not sufficient to build house, what will they get for compensation?

- To benchmark the land in harvest season to minimize impact.

- Will people get residential land for compensation of agricultural land?

- Prior to conducting work at locality, the project implementation unit will send a notification as well as a detailed work implementation plan to localities.

- Displaced households are expected to be arranged in the resettlement area in the west of An Giang University

- In addition to compensation for land and assets on land, AHs will receive additional support such as subsistence, job change and so on, relocate.

- For partially affected households of

which the remain residential land is not sufficient to build house, project will compensate with value of the full house.

- This will be considered; - - Compensation for land will be in cash;

relocated HH will be allocated a plot of land in a resettlement site;


6 My Khanh - It is necessary to inform about the compensation policy for AHs and the resettlement site for displaced households.

- There should be compensation and


- Displaced households are expected to



Page 33


assistance policy for AHs. - For partially affected households of

which the remaining residential land is not sufficient to build house, what will they get for compensation?

be arranged in the resettlement area in the west of An Giang University

- In addition to compensation for land and assets on land, AHs will receive additional support such as subsistence, job change and so on, relocate..

- For partially affected households of which the remain residential land is not sufficient to build house, project will compensate with value of the full house.

7 Binh Khanh - It is necessary to inform about the compensation policy for AHs and the resettlement site for displaced households.

- There should be fair compensation and assistance policy for AHs, particularly displaced households.

- How to calculate land price for compensation?

- What will be support for people being affected in livelihood?

- Any support for changing land use

purpose from agricultural land to be residential land?


- Displaced households are expected to be arranged in the resettlement area in the west of An Giang University

- An independent valuer will establish the compensation rates at market rates and will submit these rates to the An Giang PPC;

- In addition to compensation for land and assets on land, AHs will receive additional support such as subsistence, job change and so on, relocate..

- This will be decided case by case in coordination with local authorities;


8 Binh Duc - AHs completely agreed to participate in site clearance, most of the land to be cleared are agricultural land and land for

- Displaced households are expected to

be relocated in the resettlement area

100% of delegates participating in the project consultation meetings in localities agreed to support the project


Page 34


annual crops. Only 10 households in Binh Duc 2 and Binh Duc 4 clusters need to be relocated.


- It is necessary to inform the plan and the progress of the project implementation so that AHs are informed and arrange suitable crops.

which is arranged for households being relocated due to landslide on the bank of Hau river. This resettlement area is being constructed with area of 5.3ha with 165 land plots.

- Prior to conducting work at locality, the project implementation unit will send a notification as well as a detailed work implementation plan to localities

implementation. AHs are willing to participate in site clearance for the project implementation.

Table 21: Results of discussion with affected households on the draft compensation plan

No Date Invited

HHs Participated

HHs

No. of households agreed with

the draft compensation

plan

Number of households who

have recommendations

for the draft compensation plan

Contents of recommendation

Solutions

1 28/10/2019 - 01/11/2019

558 501 319 192 - Group 1: increase compensation rates for land: 69 comments; - Group 2: increase compensation rates for house/structure: 32 comments; - Group 3: request to recover the remaining area to be arranged for resettlement, to buy more resettlement ground due to large

- Support for leveling, digging and embankment costs: In December 2019, the Consultant surveyed cost for leveling, excavation and embankment (Certificate No. 070/BDS-MT.1912 dated December 25, 2019). The Department of Construction is currently appraising this proposal and will advise the Provincial


Page 35

No Date Invited

HHs Participated

HHs



plan





Solutions

population, affected agricultural land and to request to buy resettlement land: 76 comments; - Group 4: support for expenses for ground leveling, excavation and backfilling); proposed road construction does not affect the drainage system, recover the remaining house area, additional architectural objects, crops, ...: 62 comments.

People's Committee to issue the approval decision in January 2020. - Propose to increase compensation rates for residential land: In December, Consultant surveyed the replacement cost for residential land again in some locations where the households had comments (Certificate No. 069/DGD-MT.1912) and submitted it to the Provincial People's Committee for approval. - Propose to be acquired land out of the land clearance boundary: On December 20, 2019, Long Xuyen City People's Committee sent Document No. 5585/UBND-NC to the People's Committee of An Giang province for comments. - For households who disagreed with the price of agricultural land: At the time of drafting the

2 18/11/2019 - 26/11/2019

558 527 435 92 - Group 1: increase compensation rates for land: 69 comments; - Group 2: increase compensation rates for house/structure: 12 comments; - Group 3: request to recover the remaining area to be arranged for resettlement, to buy more resettlement ground due to large population, affected


Page 36

No Date Invited

HHs Participated

HHs



plan





Solutions

agricultural land and to request to buy resettlement land: 29 comments; - Group 4: support for expenses for ground leveling, excavation and backfilling); proposed road construction does not affect the drainage system, recover the remaining house area, additional architectural objects, crops, ...: 23 comments.

compensation plan, the price of agricultural land for calculation of support for temporary vocational change is calculated under the Decision No. 45/2014/QD-UBND dated December 29, 2014 and Decision No. 49/2017/QD -UBND 11/08/2017. However, the Provincial People's Committee has issued Decision No. 70/2019/QD-UBND dated December 23, 2019. Accordingly, the price of agricultural land to support job change has been adjusted and can meet the aspirations of the households.

Central Mekong Delta Region Connectivity Project - Component 4


Page 37

V. GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM

5.1 Responsibility

96. Agencies in charge of implementing the procedure of complaint settlement/grievance redress during compensation and land acquisition process includes the An Giang PPC, PC of Long Xuyen City, relevant departments, compensation and land acquisition committees at all levels, PCs in project affected commune/wards. Depending on functions and tasks of each level, affected persons’ complaint handling mechanism will be managed in accordance with legal documents promulgated.

97. Detailed procedures on complaint handling will be established for the project in order to ensure the opportunities of the affected persons to present their complaints on compensation and resettlement. The objective is to quickly settle complaints of the AHs in compliance with procedures. This mechanism will be designed in a simple, understandable, quick and fair way. Handling of complaints at each project level will certainly help to push project implementation progress. Affected persons who do not agree with decisions on compensation, assistance and resettlement are entitled to raise complaints based on legal regulations.

98. The process and responsibilities of resolving grievance and redress will be in compliance with Article No.204 of Land Law 2013 and Article No 17 of Decree No.43/2014/NĐ-CP dated May 15, 2014 and regulations on dealing with grievance and redress at Decree No 75/2012/NĐ-CP dated October 3, 2012. However, while awaiting complaint settlement, persons whose land is acquired have to follow decisions on land acquisition and hand over land on schedule and plan decided by competent state agencies. The independent monitoring agency to be hired by ADB will conduct period monitoring to ensure process of receive and resolve APs’ complaints compliance with GOV’s regulation and project resettlement framework. Result of monitoring will be report to investor, CIPM, ADB and relevant agencies for supervising and finding redress solutions if necessary.

5.2 Complaint procedures

99. Those affected by the project may lodge complaints relating to the rights and their responsibilities in the implementation of projects including but not limited to the entitled compensation policies and the compensation rate, revenue land acquisition, resettlement and the related entitlement programs that support recovery. The complaint may be related to occupational safety and the difficulties caused by the construction process caused. The grievance procedures will be easy to understand and access by third party in the resolution of conflicts arising from land acquisition and resettlement. Grievance redress mechanisms should consider the rights to appellate, mechanisms for dispute resolution in community and traditional. The complaints of those affected by the project are presented in writing. Affected people can present their case to CIPM, CLFD, PC of wards, communes without paying any cost.

100. It is noted that CIPM will appoint representatives to participate in the grievance redress mechanism and the term of reference for the participant will be prepared during the implementation process. After that, the project will establish a grievance redress board with independent operation from the Compensation, Support and Resettlement Committee at the city level. The grievance redress board includes city leaders, CIPM safeguard consultant (1-2 persons), representative of mass organization/non-governmental organization (1-2 persons), Lawyer association and representative of the affected person. This is to ensure fairness for affected person when resolving the complaints. Principle of this Board is information disclosure to solve project- related issues.

101. Costs for duty of the committee for complaint resolution were included in the compensation management costs of the project and at no cost to the AH. CIPM shall submit monthly monitoring report on the issue of compensation and site clearance and/or records of complaints (if any) to the committee for complaint resolution to timely re-conciliate and



Page 38

revolve, as well as help this committee oversee their process of resolving complaint. Steps of grievance redress mechanism are:

Step 1: The People's Committee of the ward/commune

102. An aggrieved APs may bring his/her complaint in writing or verbally to officials of the People's Committee of communes/wards. Members of the Committee ward/commune shall submit to the leadership ward/commune of this complaint to be resolved. Chairman ward/commune will hold separate meetings to address the complainant. Time to resolve complaints: within 30 days after receiving a complaint. The Secretariat of the Committee communes/wards is responsible for setting up and storing the entire file complaints are resolved by the People's Committee of the ward/commune.

Step 2: People's Committee of Long Xuyen City

103. If after 30 days, the aggrieved household do not hear from PC of wards, commune, or if the household are not satisfied with the decision to resolve their complaint, the household can present its case in writing or verbally to the Long Xuyen City PC at the receiving division. Long Xuyen City PC will have 30 days to settle after the date of receiving the complaint. Long Xuyen City PC is responsible for keeping records of all complaints handled by Long Xuyen City PC and will inform the Board for compensation at the District level and the affected persons any decisions being made. The households can also bring their case to court if they wish.

Step 3: The An Giang Province People’s Committee

104. If after 30 days of receiving the complainant does not hear from the People's Committee of Long Xuyen City, or the complainant is not satisfied with the decision to solve his/her complaint, the complainant may lodge complaints to the PC of An Giang province. PC of An Giang province will have 45 days to resolve the complaint to satisfy the parties involved. PC of An Giang province is responsible for keeping records of all complaints resolved. The affected can also bring their case to court if they wish.

Step 4: The decision of the court

105. If after 45 days the affected persons have received no feedback from An Giang PPC, or not satisfied with the decision being made for his/her complaints, the case can be submitted to the Court to be considered. The court's decision will be final. Decision on solving the complaints must be sent to the aggrieved PAPs and concerned parties and must be posted at the office of the People’s Committee where the complaint is resolved. The decision/result on resolution is available at commune/ward level after three days, and at City level after seven days.

106. Right at the start of project commencement, the grievance redress board will be established from the communal to provincial level based on the current structure including relevant departments, mass organizations, representatives of Women union and ethnic groups. At the communal/ward level, community-based organizations will combine the policy with the existing grievance redress mechanisms led by Commune/ward PC leaders. Grievance mechanism will resolve the complaints and will base on the availability of local resources to resolve conflicts not only on safety issues but also on other issues in the implementation process. Based on this mechanism, community-based organizations will assist in the preparation, design, implementation and development of the project in the future. The grievance mechanism will be applied to people or groups directly or indirectly affected by the project, as well as those who are interested in the project and/or have the potential to influence its performance. To minimize complaints to the An Giang PPC level, CIPM will coordinate with the Long Xuyen City Resettlement Committee to participate and advise the resolution and response to complaints.

107. AHs (men and women) can lodge complaints regarding any aspect of the land acquisition and resettlement requirements such as, entitlements, rates and payment and



Page 39

procedures for resettlement and income restoration programs. AH complaints can be made verbally or in written form. In the case of verbal complaints, the CHFLD staff or commune officials hearing the complaint will be responsible to make a written record during the first meeting with the AHs.

108. The affected people will be provided with support and assistance by locally based organizations, in case they have limited capacity or in case they have questions or complaints.

109. If efforts to resolve complaints or disputes are still unresolved and unsatisfactory following the project’s grievance redress mechanism, the households have the right to send their concerns or problems directly to ADB’s Southeast Asia Department (SERD) or through ADB Viet Nam Resident Mission. If the households are still not satisfied with the responses of SERD, they can directly contact the ADB's Office of the Special Project Facilitator as outlined in the Information Guide to the Consultation Phase of the ADB Accountability Mechanism.


Page 40

VI. LEGAL AND POLICY FRAMEWORK

110. The legal and policy framework to solve the resettlement problems of the project is prepared based on relevant laws and regulations of Viet Nam and the ADB’s involuntary resettlement policy (ADB’s Safeguard Policy Statement ADB 2009).

6.1 Relevant Laws and Regulations of Vietnam

111. The principal legal documents applied for this uRP include the followings:

112. The Constitution of the Socialist Republic of Viet Nam (2013, effective from 01 January, 2014) confirms the right of citizens to own and protects the ownership of house and production materials of citizens; compensation by market rate is made for impacts by the projects implemented for the purposes of national defense, security or public benefits (Article 32). Similarly, organizations and individuals have land use rights certificates and law protects these rights. In the case of land recovery for the purposes of national defense, security and socioeconomic development, compensation shall follow the provisions of law (Article 54).

113. In addition to the constitution, the Government has enacted a number of laws, decrees and regulations that constitute the legal framework for land acquisition, compensation and resettlement. The principal resettlement documents include the Land Law No. 45/2013/QH13; the Decree No. 43/2014/NĐ-CP on Detailed Regulations on Implementation of the Land Law No. 45/2013/QH13; the Decree No. 47/2014/ NĐ-CP on Compensation, Assistance, and Resettlement when the State Recovers Lands; Decree No. 01/2017/ND-CP amending and supplementing a number of decrees detailing the implementation of the Land Law the Decree No. 44/2014/NĐ-CP on Land Prices; Decree 45 Decree No. 45/2014/ND-CP providing the collection of land use levy; Circular No. 37/2014/BTNMT on Detailed Guidance on Compensation and Assistance when the State Recovers Land; and Circular No. 36/2014/TT-BTNMT on specifying detailed methods of valuation of land prices, construction, adjustment of land prices; specific land price valuation and land price valuation consulting services. These are the key legal documents that are applied to land recovery and resettlement.

114. The Land Law 2013 provides a comprehensive framework for land acquisition and resettlement. The main points of the Law are summarized below:

- The organization in charge of compensation and site clearance has to prepare a plan for compensation, support and resettlement. The approved plan for resettlement must be posted at Commune/Ward People's Committee (CPC/WPC) offices and at common public places where land is recovered (Article. 69).

- Under Art, 69, agencies in charge of resettlement implementation are obliged to conduct consultations on compensation plans through meetings with affected HHs; compensation plans have to be posted at ward/commune PC offices; the consultation results must be recorded in minutes which are certified by local authorities and affected HHs. Opinions from Affected Households (AF) have to be compiled; consultation has to be conducted with HHs who have objections on the plan for compensation, support and resettlement and for improving the plan.

- The Law identifies principles and methods of land valuation based on the market rate (Art. 114 3).

- Resettlement sites must be developed and fully completed before relocation of PAPs. Land recovery can only be conducted after the construction of houses and infrastructure in the resettlement site is completed. (Article 85).

- Support for training, career change and facilitating of job searching have to be provided for HHs losing agriculture land (Article 84).

- Structures and other non-land assets are not compensated for the following cases: i) where they are illegally established; ii) where they are located on land not used in


Page 41

accordance with the land purpose; and iii) where they have been built after the cut-off date (Article 92).

- For agricultural land, which was used before 01st July, 2004 for HHs without Land Use Right Certificate (LURC) or HHs that are not eligible for LURC, compensation is provided for land currently used for cultivation, without exceeding the land allocation standards (Art, 77.2).

- Monitoring and evaluation are required on a more general basis and is not specific to resettlement; it includes all aspects of the implementation of the Land Law (Art. 200);

115. Decree No. 47/2014/ND-CP of the Government of Vietnam on compensation, support and resettlement upon land recovery by the State is the main implementing Decree. The main content is summarized below:

- For HHs directly engaged in agricultural production ineligible for compensation under the Land Law, the CITY PC shall consider support for them (Art. 24);

- Support for stabilization of livelihood is based on the severity of impacts to agriculture land (Art. 19);

- Support for resettlement in case of recovery of residential land. HH receiving an amount of compensation for land lower than the value of the minimum resettlement lot are entitled to support for the difference between the minimum resettlement lot value and the amount of compensation for the land. In addition to compensation for land, relocated HH are entitled to a resettlement support amount (Article 22.);

- Resettlement sites shall be established for one or more than one project. Houses and residential land in resettlement sites shall be arranged in different grades and areas suitable to different levels of compensation and payment capacity of resettled persons (Article 26 3);

- Consultation plans on compensation, support and resettlement shall be posted up to solicit opinions of PAPs for at least 20 days from the starting date of posting (Article 28);

- For projects requiring relocation of the whole community, affecting the livelihood, socioeconomic situation and cultural tradition of the community, investors have to elaborate a policy framework on compensation, support and resettlement. (Art. 17.1).

116. Decree No. 44/2014/NĐ-CP of the Government of Vietnam identifies the mechanism for compensation at market rates. Compensation rates for land must be based on investigation, information on land plots, market rates and a suitable valuation method; Decree 44 identifies several methods for land valuation.

117. Circular No. 37/2014/BTNMT of the Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment identifies the required content of plans on compensation, support and resettlement. These plans must contain the following: i) area of each category of land to be recovered; ii) estimated number of PAH; iii) estimated amounts of compensation and settlement support; iv) expected resettlement sites; v) budget and funding sources; vi) Time-bound implementation schedule (Art. 10).

Safety Corridor

118. The Ministry of Transport issued Decree No. 11/2010/ND-CP dated February 24th, 2010 prescribing management and protection of land road infrastructures. According to Article 15 of this Decree, the area within the safety zone for the expressway is 47 m on both sides of the ROW and 17 meters for grade-I and grade-II roads. The land in the safety zone will not be acquired, but restrictions will be imposed on the use of the land. For agriculture land, there is no significant restriction as the affected households who have agricultural lands within this safety zone can still continue to do cultivation of the land. However, in some special case, the owner cannot plant tall trees within this zone for safety reasons. For


Page 42

households having residential land within the safety zone, the owners are restricted from building a new house or improve their existing one.

119. Decree 100/2013/ND-CP of the Ministry of Transport has been issued on 3 September 2013 and came into force on 20 October 2013. This Decree is amending Decree No. 11/2010/ND-CP. The main amendments are summarized below:

- Assessments of impacts and compensation have to be conducted in the safety corridor (Article 1 (3)).

- For road of Grade I and II (like the CMDCP Project), the safety corridor is 17 m (Article 15 (1));

- The Decree will not apply for project where compensation is ongoing (Art. 7a);

120. It is noted that by MOT letter No. 13510/BGTVT-QLXD on 11 December 2013 confirmed that Decrees 100/2013 and 11/2010 will not apply for the CMDCP for Components 1, 2 and 3 for Phase 1 of the project. No letter from MOT was received up to now for this component. Cuu Long CIPM will coordinate with MOT and provinces to assess the impacts of along the safety zone and will update the RP if required.

121. The other regulations that may apply for the Project are the following:

- Circular No. 76/2014/TT-BTC dated 16 June 2014 of Ministry of Finance providing a manual for carry out Decree No. 45/2014/ND-CP providing the collection of land use levy.

- Decision No. 1956/2009/QD-TTg, dated November 17, 2009, by the Prime Minister approving the Master Plan on vocational training for rural labors by 2020.

- Decision No. 63/2015/QD-TTg dated 10/12/2015 by the Prime Minister on policies to support vocational training and employment solving for workers whose land is acquired in replacement.

- Decree No. 61/2015/ND-CP dated 9/7/2015 by the Government on policies to support vocational training and National Employment Fund.

122. In addition to national legal regulations, An Giang Provincial People’s Committee of the project also issued regulations and decisions on compensation within their competence of compensation and resettlement. The main regulations from An Giang Provincial People’s Committee related to compensation and resettlement are presented below:

❖ An Giang Province

- Decision No. 103/2016/QD-UBND dated December 23, 2016 of An Giang Provincial People's Committee promulgating the regulation on land use norms in An Giang province;

- Decision No. 33/2018/QD-UBND dated October 09, 2018 of People's Committee of An Giang province on promulgating regulations on compensation, support and resettlement when the State recovers land in An Giang province.

- Decision No. 70/2019/QD-UBND dated December 23, 2019 of An Giang Provincial People's Committee promulgating the price list of land types applicable to the period of 2020-2024 in An Giang province;

- Decision No. 08/2018/QD-UBND dated April 4, 2018 of An Giang Provincial People's Committee promulgating regulations on compensation for planted trees and livestocks when the State recovers land in An Giang province;


Page 43

- Decision No. 10/2018/QD-UBND dated May 3, 2018 of An Giang Provincial People's Committee promulgating the price list of new construction of houses, structures in An Giang province;

- Decision No. 106/2016/QD-UBND dated December 30, 2016 issuing regulations on construction licensing and construction management under license in An Giang province.

- Other relevant regulations and documents for compensation, support and resettlement in An Giang province.

6.2 ADB Policies

123. ADB’s Safeguard Policy Statement (2009) confirmed for the current safeguard policies regarding: Involuntary Resettlement (IR), Indigenous People (IP), and environmental policy. The objective of ADB’s Involuntary resettlement policy is (i) to avoid involuntary resettlement wherever possible; (ii) to minimize involuntary resettlement by exploring project and design alternatives; (iii) to enhance or at least restore the livelihood and (iv) to improve the standards of living of the displaced poor and other vulnerable groups. The objective of ADB Policy on Indigenous Peoples is (i) to ensure that the project is designed and implemented in such a way that it fosters full respect for Indigenous Peoples’ identity, dignity, human rights, livelihood systems, and cultural uniqueness as defined by the Indigenous Peoples; (ii) to ensure that indigenous peoples have opportunities to participate in and benefit equally from development, not getting negative impacts from the project. Environmental policies will be discussed separately in the environmental reports.

124. The ADB Policy on Gender and Development (2006) adopts gender mainstreaming as a key strategy for stimulating gender equality, and for guaranteeing that women participate and that their needs are unambiguously addressed in the decision-making process for development activities. New safeguard requirements and policies also re-confirm importance of gender mainstreaming in safeguard policies at all project stages to ensure gender-related issues are addressed, including in-depth discussion and interview on gender and information dissemination. This includes special attention to women’s rights and land ownership, assistance for women’s life restoration/improvement to ensure that women can get equal benefits. ADB’s other policies regarding resettlement plan are (i) Public communication policy (2011) and (ii) Accountability mechanism policy (2012).

❖ Project’s principle

125. The objectives of the ADB Safeguard Policy Statement regarding involuntary resettlement are to avoid impacts on people, households, businesses and other stakeholders whenever possible, where resettlement is unavoidable, to improve the living standard for the poor and the vulnerable groups to be better or at least equal to their condition before the project; to improve living condition of the poor or the vulnerable groups by paying compensation for the affected/lost assets in replacement cost and suitable assistances.

126. Basic policies

a. Screen the project early on to identify past, present, and future involuntary resettlement impacts and risks. Determine the scope of resettlement planning through a survey and/or census of affected persons, including a gender analysis, specifically related to resettlement impacts and risks.

b. Conduct consultations with the displaced households, local communities and stakeholders. Announce all affected persons about their entitled benefits and resettlement options. Ensure community participation in preparation, implementation, monitoring and assessing of the resettlement plan. Pay special attention to the


Page 44

demand of vulnerable groups, particularly people under poor, landless holding people, the elderly, women and children, indigenous people and people not eligible to have LURCs, ensuring that these people are consulted properly. Establish a grievance redress mechanism to receive and resolve affected people’s complaints. Support social and cultural institutions for displaced people and local people in that area. In case the involuntary resettlement poses complicated and sensitive impacts, it will require a process of social preparation before deciding on resettlement and compensation.

c. Improve, or at least restore, the livelihoods of all affected persons through (i) land-based resettlement strategies when affected livelihoods are land based where possible or cash compensation at replacement value for land when the loss of land does not undermine livelihoods, (ii) prompt replacement of assets with access to assets of equal or higher value, (iii) prompt compensation at full replacement cost for assets that cannot be restored, and (iv) additional revenues and services through benefit sharing schemes where possible.

d. Provide physically and economically affected persons with needed assistance, including the following: (i) if there is relocation, secured tenure to relocation land, better housing at resettlement sites with comparable access to employment and production opportunities, integration of resettled persons economically and socially into their host communities, and extension of project benefits to host communities; (ii) transitional support and development assistance, such as land development, credit facilities, training, or employment opportunities; and (iii) civic infrastructure and community services, as required.

e. Improve the standards of living of the affected poor and other vulnerable groups, including women, to at least national minimum standards. In rural areas provide them with legal and affordable access to land and resources, and in urban areas provide them with appropriate income sources and legal and affordable access to adequate housing.

f. Develop procedures in a transparent, consistent, and equitable manner if land acquisition is through negotiated settlement.

g. Ensure that affected persons without titles to land or any recognizable legal rights to land are eligible for resettlement assistance and compensation for loss of non-land assets.

h. Prepare a resettlement plan elaborating on affected persons’ entitlements, the income and livelihood restoration strategy, institutional arrangements, monitoring and reporting framework, budget, and time-bound implementation schedule.

i. Disclose a draft resettlement plan, including documentation of the consultation process in a timely manner, before project appraisal, in an acceptable place and a form and language(s) understandable to affected persons and other stakeholders. Disclose the final resettlement plan and its updates to affected persons and other stakeholders.

j. Conceive and execute involuntary resettlement as part of a development project or program. Include the full costs of resettlement in the presentation of project’s cost and benefits. For a project with significant involuntary resettlement impacts, consider implementing the involuntary resettlement component of the project as a stand-alone operation.

k. Pay compensation and provide other resettlement entitlements before physical or economic displacement. Implement the resettlement plan under close supervision throughout project implementation.


Page 45

l. Monitor and assess resettlement outcomes, their impacts on the standards of living of affected persons, and whether the objectives of the resettlement plan have been achieved by taking into account the baseline conditions and the results of resettlement monitoring. Disclose monitoring reports.

❖ Compliance policy

127. All affected households defined to live in the project areas before the cut-off date will be entitled to get compensation for the affected assets and suitable allowances to improve or at least to restore their living and income source before the project. The cut-off date for this project is the date of statement on land acquisition. The cut-off-date defined for this project is on May 25, 2019.

128. People encroaching the project areas after the cut-off date will be given no entitlement for any compensation or assistances. They will be announced in advance (10 days) to have a suitable time for demolition their own structures and displacing from the areas before the commencement of the project construction.

6.3 Reconciliation of Government and ADB Policies on Resettlement

129. Policies on compensation and resettlement for the Central Mekong Delta Connectivity Project comply with ADB’s requirements and Government’s regulations. The condition to get ADB’s donation is that compensation, resettlement and income restoration for all affected households need to follow the principle in ADB’s Safeguard Policy Statement and ABD’s policies on involuntary resettlement.

130. With the promulgation of the Decree 47/2014/ND-CP and relevant decrees stated above, the policies and practices of the Government have become more consistent with ADB’s social safeguards policies. Nonetheless, provisions and principles adopted in this uRP will supersede the provisions of the relevant decrees currently in force in Viet Nam wherever a gap exists, as provided for under Decree 16/2016/ND-CP (March 2016), which regulates the management and use of official development assistance.

131. It should also be noted that as per Decree 47/2014/ND-CP, Article 25, it states "Apart from the supports prescribed in Article 19, 20, 21, 22, 23 and 24 of this Decree, basing themselves on the local realities, the provincial-level People’s Committee Chairmen shall decide on other supporting measures to stabilize life and production of persons who have land recovered; special cases shall be submitted to the Prime Minister for decision”.

132. The differences between the Government’s Laws and Decrees and ADB Policy with regard to resettlement and compensation, and how to address these gaps for this Project are shown in the table below.


Page 46

Table 22: Gaps between National Laws and ADB Policies and Gap Filling Measures

Items Vietnam Regulations ADB SPS (2009) Project Policy

AHs without LURC

Land Law 2013, Art. 77, Art. 2 & Art. 92: Person who has used land before 1st July 2004 & directly involved in agriculture production on the acquired land without LURC or cannot be legalizable will be compensated for the acquired land area but not exceed quota of agricultural land allocation. However, no compensation for non-land assets in the following cases: (i) the assets subject to the land recovery as stipulated in one of items a, b, d, đ, e, l, clause 1, article 1, article 64 and items b, d, clause 1, article 65 of the Land Law 2013; (ii) the assets created after the notification on land acquisition; and (iii) unused public infrastructures and other works

APs who have neither formal legal rights nor recognized or recognizable claims to such land are entitled to be compensated for the loss of non-land assets other than land, and also for other improvements to the land (i.e. crops, irrigation…) at full replacement cost if they occupied the land or structures prior to the cut-off date. The safeguard policies cover limitations for the land use or access to parks and reserved areas, including temporary and partial losses.

APs without LURC or recognizable legal claims to land acquired, will be equally entitled to participation in consultations and project benefit schemes where possible, and be compensated for their lost non-land assets created before cut-off date at replacement cost. They will be entitled to resettlement assistance and other compensation and social support to assist them to improve or at least restore their pre-project living standards and income levels. Agricultural land used prior to 1/7/2004 is compensated with an amount of equal to 100% of the land at full replacement cost

Businesses with no business registration license

Decree No. 47/2014, Article 19: Economic organizations, households and individuals engaged in production and business and foreign-invested enterprises having to stop production and business upon land recovery by the State are entitled to support for production stabilization if they have LURC Article 19: Economic organization, household business, individual production unit or enterprise with foreign capital as subjects to item d, clause 1 of this article will be supported for subsistence with the highest compensation equal to 30% of one year after-tax revenue, based on the average income of the 3 last consecutive years.

Whatever impact to displaced persons who are affected in financial source, the borrower/investor will make compensation for all income sources at replacement cost. These affected persons will be also entitled with assistance such as borrowing capital, training and job introduction to get improved income or at least equal to their living condition before the project.

Non-registered persons with income sources being affected (businesses with no registration, employees with no labor contract) will be entitled with suitable assistance to ensure their income sources are restored to be better or at least equal to their level before the project. Living condition of poor people and vulnerable groups, including female-headed HH will be


Page 47

Items Vietnam Regulations ADB SPS (2009) Project Policy

No mention of compensation/assistance for HH without registration/LURC

improved.

Criteria for determining significant impact

Decree 47/2014/ND-CP, Article 19, Item 3: APs losing from more than 30% of productive land are considered severely impacted and are entitled to livelihood restoration measures

The involuntary resettlement in ADB’s projects is considered severe if over 200 peoples are under considerable impacts like (i) physically displaced from housing or (ii) losing from 10% of their productive assets (income generating).

APs losing from 10% or more of their productive assets (income generating) or who are physically displaced shall be considered as severely affected

Agency evaluating losses

People’s committee of province/city under central government will establish land price framework based on principles in Article 112, 113 and 114 of the Land Law 2013. Competent agencies can appoint consultant for land price determination (Article 114, Land law 2013).

Experienced and eligible experts will evaluate value of the lost assets.

Surveying on replacement cost for the project is conducted by eligible consultancy units in fields of land price and land price determination. Consultancy units need to follow principles and method for determining land price prescribed by the Government. This price will be submitted by City/district compensation committee to City PC/PPC for approval for the project


Page 48

VII. ENTITLEMENTS, ASSISTANCE AND BENEFITS

133. Entitlements of the affected people (including compensation, assistance, resettlement and livelihood restoration) are described in the following entitlement matrix, which are adapted to the impacts identified during the IOL.

134. As per ADB SPS, entitled persons are: (i) persons with formal legal rights to land lost in its entirety or in part; (ii) persons who lost the land they occupy in its entirety or in part who have no formal legal rights to such land, but who have claims to such lands that are recognized or recognizable under national laws; and (iii) persons who lost the land they occupy in its entirety or in part who have neither formal legal rights nor recognized or recognizable claims to such land.

135. Entitlements adopted are based on Government Decisions, ADB Social Safeguard policies and on the Prime Minister Letter No 2232/TTg-KTN dated 05/12/2011 on approval policy framework of compensation, support and resettlement for the Central Mekong Delta Region Connectivity Project. This entitlement matrix has been reviewed and adapted following the issuance of the new Land law and on new provincial regulations. No significant changes were identified and no entitlement has been downgraded.

136. These entitlements have been discussed with local authorities and various departments from Can Tho City and An Giang province on 24/7/2017 and 03/08/2017. The following departments were consulted: Department of Natural Resources and Environment; Department of Finance, Department of Construction; Departments of Agriculture and Rural Development; Department of Labor, Invalids and Social Affairs; Women's Union; People's Committee at district, communal levels, etc. Based on the comments of the People's Committee of An Giang Province and the People's Committee of Can Tho City, the compensation, support and resettlement policy framework of the Component 4 Project - The Interconnecting road to 91 and Long Xuyen City bypass has been adjusted and has been approved by the Prime Minister in Document No. 1515/TTg-QHQT dated November 1, 2018 (see Appendix 1).

137. The entitlements to each type of affected household depends on the type and level of the damage. The entitlements also include different measures aimed at enabling affected households to obtain development benefits from the project, as well as supporting vulnerable households to improve their livelihoods. The entitlement matrix of the Project is shown in the table below.

Central Mekong Delta Connectivity Project – Component 4 Resettlement Plan

Page 49

Table 23: Entitlement Matrix8

8 During the component implementation, if there have some additional impacts/unpredictable issues, the addendum to uRP will be required to ensure all AHs and affected assets will be compensated following the ADB policies as well as the project policies.

No. Impacts Level of

impacts Eligible persons

Entitlements Implementation issues

I IMPACTS ON LAND

1.1. Impacts on productive land (agricultural land, fruit tree land, aquaculture land, garden land)

a. Marginal

impact: HH losing less than 10% of their total productive land

Owners with Land Use Rights Certificate (LURC), eligible to acquire LURC according to GOV regulations, or otherwise legalizable under GOV regulations (72 households)

i. Cash compensation at replacement cost which is equivalent to current market price free from transaction costs (e.g. taxes, certification, and administrative cost).

ii. Support for Vocational training, job change and job creation assistance as set out in provincial policies see item 3.2 (ii).

iii. For affected non-land assets, see item II below.

- Supports and allowances will be paid simultaneously with the payment of compensation.

- Support for vocational training, job change and job creation assistance is applied only for HH and individuals directly involved in agricultural production;

- The area to be assisted will not exceed the agricultural land allocation limit as stipulated by the PPC at that time;

- If the remaining land is no longer viable (less than 500 m2 for annual crop land, aquaculture land, perennial crop land or less than 3,000 m2 for forestry land as prescribed in Article 5, Decision 103/2016/QD-UBND dated 23/12/2016), and if the AHs agree, that land will be recovered and compensated according to the project's policy.

-

b. Severely affected

HH losing more than 10% of their total productive land

Owners with Land Use Rights Certificate (LURC), eligible to acquire LURC according to GOV regulations, or otherwise legalizable under GOV regulations (326 households)

i. As priority, compensation "land for land" with equivalent productive capacity at a location acceptable to the AHs, or, if requested by the AHs, or if "land for land” is not available, cash compensation for the lost land at 100% of replacement cost which is equivalent to current market price and free from transaction costs (e.g., taxes, certification and administration costs).

ii. Support for Vocational training, job change and job creation assistance as set out in provincial policies see item 3.2 (ii).

iii. AHs will be entitled to participate in the Income Restoration Program (IRP);

iv. For non-land affected assets, see item II below.


Page 50

v. For allowances due to severe loss, see item III below;

c. Affected agricultural land (non-title users)

Non-titled user not eligible to become legalized

(No HH identified during DMS)

i. No compensation for land; ii. Compensation for non-land assets (crops,

trees, structures), see item II below; iii. If the AP is classified as poor and directly use

the land they are entitled to receive cash assistance as per /PPC’s decision.

-

User with lease or temporary right

(No HH identified during DMS)

i. No compensation for land ii. Compensation for investment cost in land

and/or remaining contract term. iii. For non-land affected assets, see item II

below

- DRC or CRC will determine the value of investments on the affected land in consultation with the AHs

d. Temporary loss

Land user regardless tenure status. (Number of HH to be determined during implementation)

i. Cash compensation based on average yield of 3 years according to the statistical data provided by the PPC. Compensation payment shall not less than minimum wage range for laborers who have to relocate from the affected land.

ii. Full restoration of affected land to pre-impact conditions.

iii. APs being thus displaced for periods in excess of one year will be entitled to participate in vocational training programs.

- Temporary impacts will be minimized by reducing the area used, utilizing areas being permanently acquired for the project where feasible and reducing the time of the temporary acquisition as much as least as possible (maximum 3 years)

1.2 Loss of residential land

a. Partially-affected (the remaining land area is viable to rebuild house and not requiring relocation)

Owners with LURC, eligible to acquire LURC in accordance with the Land Law. (35 households)

i. Cash compensation for the portion to be acquired permanently basing on the category of land as defined in LURC and re-determined in accordance with the Land Law and implementing decrees (Article 24, Decree No. 43/2014/ND-CP) at replacement cost which is equivalent to current market price and free from transaction costs (e.g., taxes, certification, and administration costs). In case the eligible persons have not implemented financial obligations for land, deduction will be conducted (Clause 4, Article 93 of the Land Law 2013 and Clause

- Minimum permitted residential lot size for resettlement is as City PC/PPC regulations;.

- If the remaining land area is equal to or larger than area of land lot in RS as stipulated by the PPC (greater than 35 m2 for wards or greater than 45 m2 for communes as prescribed in Article 5, Decision 103/2016/QD-UBND dated December 23, 2016) but not enough to build house as stipulated by /PPC (Clause a.5, Article 6, Decision 103/2016/QD-UBND dated December 23, 2016), this remaining land will be considered to be acquired and compensated at replacement cost.


Page 51

1, Article 30 of Decree No. 47/2014/ND - CP) ii. For affected non-land assets, see item II

below.

Non-titled user not eligible to become legalized (No HH identified during DMS)

i. No compensation for land ii. Compensation for non-land assets

(structures, crops, trees). See item II below.

- Assistance level for AHs without another residence will be based on regulations of the competent authorities

b. Fully affected

(The remaining land area is not enough to build house according to current standards or smaller than the quota of plot separation prescribed by the Provincial People's Committee (less than 35 m2 for ward or less than 45 m2 for commune according to prescribed in Article 5, Decision 103/2016/QD-

Owners with LURC, eligible to acquire LURC according to regulations of the Land Law (70 households)

Cash compensation

i. Cash compensation at replacement cost which is equivalent to current market price and free from transaction costs (e.g., taxes, certification, administrative costs).

Allocation of plot in Resettlement Site

ii. Allocation of a minimum of one residential land plot at the resettlement site in accordance with applicable regulations of the PPC:

➢ Household/individual is acquired land and relocated house;

➢ Where extended families jointly reside on the same acquired lot and would be eligible for separate household registration books, or if there are multiple households jointly holding the same LURC then additional resettlement lots will be granted by the PPC’s decision;

➢ Household/individuals using land with houses before July 1, 2004, whose origin is due to encroachment or occupation, when the State

- Resettlement sites are to have adequate infrastructure and access to social services.

- Depending on the area, category and location of affected land, AHs may be entitled to additional resettlement lots as specified in the relevant PPC’s decision.

- Where the entitlement for number of lots granted are less than the actual number of multiple households, consideration will be given to grant priority access of remaining households to purchase resettlement plots and facilitate suitable payment arrangements as needed. The sub-households (not mentioned in LURC) of multiple households will pay land use fee for the additional resettlement lots.

- The allocation of resettlement lots will take account of the needs of extended families to be co-located. In this regard, special attention will be paid to the elderly residing separately, female headed households and vulnerable AHs.


Page 52

UBND dated December 23, 2016)

c. (the

remaining land area is not enough to establish a new land lot as per the minimum land allocation limit as stipulated by the City PC/PPC)

recovers land if there is no other place of residence (including households built houses on canals).

➢ Household/individual must relocate when recovering land but are not eligible to pay compensation for residential land without any other residential land within the commune, ward or township where the land is recovered.

In case displaced persons are allocated resettlement lot but compensation and assistance amount are not enough to buy a minimum resettlement lot at the resettlement site, the State will cover the difference with an amount not exceeding the difference between the land compensation and the local minimum resettlement plot (Article 86, the Land Law 2013 and Article 30.2 of Decree No. 47/2014/ND-CP).Self-Relocation

iii. Those entitled to receive a resettlement lot, but choose not to receive such shall receive a lot infrastructure development grant as per relevant decision of the PPC at the time of land acquisition:

➢ Land acquired in wards: support for self-relocation of VND 80,000,000/HH;

➢ Land recovered in communes: support for self-relocation of VND 40,000,000/HH.

Others

iv. For allowances associated with relocation of house, see item III below

v. Entitled to the income restoration


Page 53

program

Land user without LURC and not eligible to be granted LURC (No HH identified during the DMS)

i. No compensation for land. ii. Eligible to participate the income restoration

program. iii. Those displaced from land they are residing on

prior to the cut-off date, have no alternative accommodation in the affected commune/ward and who are otherwise ineligible for a resettlement lot shall be favorably considered for grant of a resettlement lot plus assistance)

iv. For affected non-land assets, see item II below.

v. For allowances associated with relocation of house, see item III below.

- For households without residence/ or residential land at other place, City PC/PPC will consider to assist each particular case.

d. Residential land with no residential structure

Owners with LURC, or eligible to acquire LURC according to Government regulations

(i) Cash compensation for the permanently acquired land at replacement cost.

(ii) Household/individual is fully acquired the only residential land within the commune, ward or township where the land is acquired; a plot in RS will be allocated to this HH (20 HHs)

- Minimum permitted residential lot size is according to provincial regulations.

- If the remaining portion is less than minimum permitted residential lot size then the entire lot will be acquired.

II AFFECTED NON-LAND ASSETS

2.1 Loss of assets (houses, structures built on land)

a. House and other structures partially affected (the remaining part is viable)

Owner of structures regardless of tenure status (26 households)

i. Cash compensation at replacement cost equivalent to current market prices without depreciation or deductions for salvaged building materials.

ii. Repair compensation equivalent to the actual cost of repair (materials and labour).

iii. For allowances, see item III below.


Page 54

b. House and other structures (or partly affected but the remaining part is not viable)

Owner of structures regardless of tenure status (119 households)

i. Cash compensation at replacement cost equivalent to current market prices without depreciation or deductions for salvaged building materials.

ii. For allowances, see item IV below

- Relocated household whose house is affected but have no land (Landless HH) will be considered for allocation of land lot in a Resettlement Site.

2.2. Affected Business structures

c. Business structures

Owner regardless tenure status (13 AHs)

i. Cash compensation at replacement cost equivalent to current market prices of materials and labor without depreciation or deductions for salvaged building materials for the affected portion at the time of compensation.

ii. Other business assets (not structures): Owners of businesses will be considered (by PPC) to be assisted with relevant costs of not fixed business assets (material and equipment) remaining at the time of displacement. The PPC will decide on assistance based on each specific case after receiving a request from the owner of the business.

iii. For allowances, see item III below

2.3 Impacts on graves Graves

Affected households (37 households)

i. All costs of exhume, relocation and reburial will be redeemed in cash for AHs in accordance with regulations of the City/PC PPC.

An Giang province: compensation for grave relocation and reburial will be redeemed in accordance with Decision No. 10/2018/QĐ-UBND by An Giang PPC dated 03/05/ 2018.

- For unclaimed affected graves, compensation will be given to Ward/Commune PCs to relocate these graves to a local cemetery.

- Graves need to be exhumed and relocated on culturally, spiritually and customarily appropriate basis.

2.4 Crops, trees and livestock

Impacts or damages to trees and crops

Owners regardless of tenure status (151 households)

i. For standing annual crops, cash compensation equivalent to current market value of crops at the time of compensation;

ii. For perennial crops trees, cash compensation at replacement cost

- AHs have the right to use salvageable trees, crops and livestock after acquisition.

- AHs will be given 3 months’ notice prior to land acquisition.

- AHs will receive cash compensation based on


Page 55

equivalent to current market value given the type, age and productive value (future production) at the time of compensation.

iii. Timber trees based on diameter at breast height at current market value.

iv. Aquaculture products that are unharvested at time of land acquisition will be compensated for loss due to early harvesting. If it is removable, costs of removal and loss due to removal will be compensated at level stipulated by the PPC.

In An Giang province: the cost of compensation and support for crops, crops and livestock will be implemented in accordance with Decision No. 10/2018/QD-UBND issued by PC of An Giang Province in May 3, 2018.

market price of ripened crops/fruit for any unharvested crops that were planted prior to the land acquisition announcement

2.5 Loss of public facilities

Loss of or damage to assets

Relevant agencies

i. Cash compensation to cover the cost of restoring facilities

(One Base Transceiver Station of Vinaphone company)

- Relocation or re-construction of public facilities will be done with minimal disruption to public service.

2.56 Impacts on cultural value

Impacts on cultural value

Can Xai church i. All land and assets on public land and affected cultural heritages will be reconstructed on the same site. All reasonable costs of transportation, construction, cultural rituals will be incurred by the Project.

- DRC/Long Xuyen City will determine compensation for each specific case

III TRANSITION ASSISTANCE


Page 56

3.1 Severe impacts due to physical displacement

Severe impacts due to physical displacement

Relocating households regardless of tenure status. (119 households)

i. Transport allowance:

Cash allowance sufficient for the transport of AHs to the new residences. Allowance level is determined by the PPC as follow: An Giang province: Article 23 of Decision No. 33/2018 dated on October 09, 2018 by An Giang PPC:

➢ Houses with floor area ≤ 50m2: 5 M VND/HH;

➢ Houses with floor area 50m2 - 1000m2: 10 M VND/HH

➢ Houses with floor area > 100m2: 15 M VND/HH.

ii. Subsistence allowance Subsistence allowance in cash to support the HH during the period of transition while establishing a new house:

➢ Fully affected and relocated HH: HH will be provided with cash assistance equivalent to 30kg of rice for each household member for a period of 6 months;

➢ Household with partially affected house, not relocated: HH will be provided with cash assistance equivalent to 30kg of rice for each household member for a period of 3 months.

iii. Rental assistance

For those without alternative accommodation during the time of establishment of new house, are:

- Waiting for resettlement land/house at a resettlement site;

- Waiting for completion of construction of alternative house outside the resettlement site.

- Shall receive the house rental. Assistance

- Transport allowance to be provided to AHs displaced from rented accommodation and those temporarily displaced.


Page 57

level will be decided by the PPC at time of land acquisition.

An Giang Province: According to Article 32 of Decision 33/2018/QD-UBND dated 9 October 2018 of An Giang Provincial People's Committee:

- Household ≤ 4 persons: VND 1,600,000/household/month; - Households ≥ 5 persons: VND 4,000,000/person/month

The time for calculation of rental assistance is from the date the land user hands-over land until after 3 months of receiving a plot in RS. For households who are self-relocated, they will be provided rental assistance with a lump sum equal to 6 months. The rental assistance is paid times, each time is not exceeding 06 months.

iv. Vocational training and income restoration

Members of households whose livelihoods are affected by displacement have the right to participate in income restoration program including:

➢ Participate in a free vocational training course in the province;

➢ Income restoration program funded by the project.

3.2 Loss of Income/ livelihood due to loss of agricultural land.

Fully or partially affected (398 households)

AHs whose agricultural land is affected

i. Stabilization assistance

An Giang Province: According to Article 27 of Decision No. 33/2018/QD-UBND dated October 9, 2018 of the People's Committee of An Giang Province, but not limited to a minimum acquisition area of 500 m2 of agricultural land.


Page 58

- Loss from 10-- <30% total agricultural landholding: Cash assistance equivalent to 30kg of rice per household member within 3 months if no requiring relocation and within 6 months if requiring relocation. If AHs have to move to the locality with difficult socio-economic conditions or extremely disadvantageous socio-economic conditions, maximum assistance time will be 12 months.

- Loss from 30 - <70% total agricultural landholding: Cash assistance equivalent to 30kg of rice per household member within 6 months if no requiring relocation and within 12 months if requiring relocation. If AHs have to move to the locality with difficult socio-economic conditions or extremely disadvantageous socio-economic conditions, maximum assistance time will be 24 months.

- Loss from 70 agricultural landholding: Cash assistance equivalent to 30kg of rice per household member within 12 months if no requiring relocation and within 24 months if requiring relocation. If AHs have to move to the locality with difficult socio-economic conditions or extremely disadvantageous socio-economic conditions, maximum assistance time will be 36 months.

ii. Vocational training, job change and job creation assistance

- An Giang province:

In An Giang province: According to Article 28 of Decision 33/2018/QD-UBND dated 09/10/2018 of An Giang Provincial People's Committee Households and individuals that are direct agricultural production certified by commune-level People's Committees to

- AHs who are not eligible for compensation for

agricultural land shall be entitled to receive subsistence allowance, income restoration allowance and vocational training assistance.

- Income restoration allowance and vocational training is not provided to those who are compensated with land-for-land nor those whose agricultural land is subject to supplementary compensation due to being on same lot as the household residential house (as in 1 above).

- However, the above problems does not affect the entitlements that vulnerable AP households are high risk have eligible to receive compensation policy as under RP Entitlements..


Page 59

have stable incomes from agricultural production when the State recovers agricultural land but receive monetary compensation shall be supported. changing jobs. The monetary support level is equal to 3 times of the price of agricultural land of the same type of land according to the land price prescribled by PPC; the supported area does not exceed the prescribed agricultural land quota.

iii. Vocational training and income restoration

Members of households whose livelihoods are affected by displacement have the right to participate in income restoration program including:

➢ Participate in a free vocational training course in the province;

➢ Income restoration program funded by the project if HH losses from 10% of total land area.

3.3 Loss of income/ livelihood due to relocation of business

With business registration

Registered business owner

(2 households)

Applied Clause 1a, Article 29 of Decision 33/2018/QD-UBND dated October 9, 2018 of An Giang Provincial People's Committee Support equal to 30% of the one year after-tax income at the average income level of the three preceding years. If the business has been less than three years, the average of years of doing business will be calculated

Without business registration

Non-registered business owner (11 households)

Applied Clause 1b, Article 29 of Decision 33/2018/QD-UBND dated October 9, 2018 of An Giang Provincial People's Committee DRC will determine assistance level appropriate with actual income (profit), not exceeding 3 months of income, corresponding to kind of


Page 60

interrupted business.

With business registration

Renters of business locations (No HH identified during DMS)

Applied Clause 1a, Article 29 of Decision 33/2018/QD-UBND dated October 9, 2018 of An Giang Provincial People's Committee (i) Support equal to 30% of the one year after-

tax income at the average income level of the three preceding years. If the business has been less than three years, the average of years of doing business will be calculated

Employees Employees with fixed-term labor contracts from 12 to 36 months or non-fixed term labor contract or unemployed due to the project’s impacts on business facilities

(i) Cash allowance within time of temporary business interruption but allowance time shall not exceed 6 months of wage (excluding taxes) as stipulated in the labor contract but not less than the regional minimum wage level (Article 19.6, Decree No.47/2014/ND - CP)

Employees with labor contracts from 3 to 12 months and seasonal employees at the business facilities

(i) Cash assistance equivalent to minimum wage during time of business interruption or 6-months of wage as per the regional minimum wage level.

IV SPECIAL ASSISTANCE

4.1. High risk due to loss of livelihood/relocation

Loss of land and non-land assets/ relocation

Affected vulnerable groups regardless of severity of impacts (poor HH, near-poor

(i) Special allowance

- Particially affected: 5 M/HH - Fully affected and relocated: ➢ Poor HH and policy HH: 10 M/HH ➢ Other vulnerable HH: 5 M/HH

-

- For households belonging to more than one

category, they will be entitled to the highest assistance policy

- The floor area of house to be thus upgraded


Page 61

HH, female-hheaded HH with dependents, policy HH, disabled HH, Elderly HH, Landless HH, Ethnic minorities) (83 households)

(ii) House upgrade assistance

- Vulnerable households and female headed households with less than a category IV house or who are compensated for a house of less than category IV shall receive additional assistance to enable them to upgrade their house to category IV standard (grade 3.5 according to regulation by An Giang PPC).

- Disabled AHs shall receive assistance to upgrade their houses to provide for appropriate accessibility (e.g. wheelchair access).

(iii) Vocational training and income restoration

- In addition to other income restoration entitlements mentioned elsewhere vulnerable and female headed households will be entitled to: ➢ One additional vocational training course

per household member within the province free of charge;

➢ Additional income restoration program assistance sponsored under the project.

according to the PPC’s decision at time of land acquisition.

- Design of replacement houses provided to elderly AHs or AHs with disability is to take account of accessibility needs (e.g. minimizing steps and provision of ramp access);

4.2 Handover the ground on schedule

AHs move out of the affected areas on time (558 HHs and 2 organizations)

(i) Incentive Bonus for hand over the land on schedule:

All households who hand over the site on time will receive an incentive bonus for handing the site in accordance with Clause 6a, Article 32 of. Decision 33/2018/QD-UBND dated October 9, 2018 of An Giang Provincial People's Committee. The support level is from 2 million to 15 million depending on the amount of compensation and support received.


Page 62

4.3 Additional allowances/

supports (if necessary)

AHs (i) AHs who will lose income sources will be entitled to take part in Income Restoration Programs. Rehabilitation measures like agricultural extension services, job training and creation, credit access and/or other measures as appropriate will be given to AHs losing income sources to ensure their livelihood could be restored to the pre-project level.

(ii) Apart from the assistances mentioned above, based on the actual situation, the Project may consider other assistances to secure life stabilization, culture, production and livelihoods of AHs.

- Income and Livelihood Restoration Programs will be designed in combination with current programs of the locality and with the assistance of livelihoods experts.

- The programs will target the needs of both men and women

5 TEMPORARY IMPACTS DURING CONSTRUCTION

5.1. For temporary loss of land/assets on affected land

Temporary loss of land/assets on affected land

Owners/ users affected land and/or assets created where to be used as temporary construction plan

(i) In case the project needs temporary construction plan, CIPM rents the land of the owners complying with regulations stipulated by the Civil Law.

5.2. For impact arising from the construction

Damages caused by contractors to private or public structures

Owners/ users affected land and/or assets created on affected land

(ii) Damaged property will be restored to its former condition by contractors, immediately upon completion of civil works

(iii) Under their contract terms and conditions, the contractors will be required to take extreme care to avoid damaging property during their construction activities. Where damages do occur, the contractor will be required to repair the damage and may also be required to pay compensation to the affected families, groups, communities, or government agencies at the same compensation rates that are applied to all other assets affected by the Project.

- In case of impacts on livelihoods of AHs, the contractors, construction units have to agree with the households on payment for disruption of business.


Page 63

6 OTHER IMPACTS

Other impacts Any other impacts that may be identified during implementation

Individuals, organizations in the project area

(i) In case the Project causes restriction of access to resources or residents’ establishments, such households will be received necessary additional compensation amount or allowances.

(ii) Entitlements to compensation and other assistance could be provided in accordance with the compensation policy.

(iii) Secondary impacts on production and business or AHs isolated from access to resources temporarily have to be compensated and supported in accordance of ADB


Page 64

VIII. RESETTLEMENT ARRANGEMENTS

8.1 Resettlement Options

138. There are three options for resettlement: (i) on-site resettlement (on the AH’s remaining land area); (ii) self - relocation where AHs are entitled to compensation/resettlement for the land but prefer to find their new residential areas by themselves and (iii) serviced resettlement site where AHs are provided with plots of land in the resettlement site.

❖ On-site Resettlement

139. The on-site resettlement option is applicable to households whose houses are partly or totally affected but the remaining area is sufficiently large to rebuild their houses. 26 HHs could reorganize on their remaining viable residential land. In cases where the AH’s remaining area is agricultural land that is located in a planned residential area of the city, they will be supported by the local government to change the land use purpose from agricultural land into residential land to be resettled.

❖ Self-relocation

140. This resettlement option is offered to households whose entire house is affected. In this case, the affected HH, in addition to receiving compensation at replacement cost, are supported with an amount for self-relocation.

141. According to Article 38 of Decision No. 33/2018/QD-UBND dated October 9, 2018 of the PC of An Giang province, allowance for self-relocation is applied as follows:

- For land recovered in wards: support for self-relocation of VND 80,000,000/HH;

- For recovered land in communes: support for self-relocation of VND 40,000,000/HH

142. However, through consultation, no households have chosen the self-relocation option.

❖ Relocation in resettlement site

143. Households whose entire houses are affected will be allocated plots in the project resettlement sites if they wish.

144. On March 2, 2018, An Giang Provincial People's Committee issued Decision No. 431/QD-UBND approving the investment project on constructing the expanded resettlement site on West of University in My Phuoc, My Hoa wards, Long Xuyen City, An Giang Province. Total area of this resettlement area is 99,987 m2, this resettlement site is expected to build 656 plots to arrange resettlement for: (i) The project of the interconnecting road to NH91 and Long Xuyen City bypass; and (ii) Vietnam Urban Upgrading Project - Long Xuyen City Subproject.

145. However, on October 30, 2018, An Giang People's Committee issued Decision No. 2705/QD-UBND approving the adjustment (the first time) the investment project on constructing the expanded resettlement site on West of University in My Phuoc, My Hoa wards, Long Xuyen City, An Giang Province. Reason for adjustment: Adjustment of project size reduction due to the separation of the Resettlement Sub-project for Vietnam Urban Upgrading Project - Long Xuyen City Sub-project according to the adjustment policy in Official Letter No. 4847/VPUBND-KTN dated September 19, 2018 of An Giang Provincial People's Committee. Accordingly, the total area of this resettlement site after adjustment is 60,152 m2; It is expected to build 271 resettlement plots just to arrange for Component 4 - the interconnecting road to NH91 and Long Xuyen City bypass (however according to the actual design, the number of plots of this resettlement site is up to 331 plots). Total investment of this resettlement site is VND 152,259 billion, of which the central budget


Page 65

(capital from the Ministry of Transport) is VND 98,259 billion; provincial budget: 54 billion dong. Currently, the total investment is adjusting, not using the central budget, but only using the budget of An Giang Provincial People's Committee and the budget of Long Xuyen City People's Committee.

146. This resettlement site was formerly farmland, compensation, land acquisition was completed in 2018. The resettlement site has the following infrastructure: roads, trees, water supply and drainage, water, lighting, electricity supply. When designing this resettlement site, the designed agency considered access to social services such as health centers, schools, markets and trade centers. Primary and secondary schools are located 1.5-3 km from the resettlement site, the market is 2 km from the resettlement site ... The average distance from current relocated HH location is about 1.5 - 4 km; this will reduce social and economic disruption

147. The expanded resettlement site on West of University will be built with 12 blocks with relatively diverse areas (from 55.0 to 137.4 m2/plot). The construction of resettlement areas with various types of plots (various area) makes the arrangement of resettlement more suitable to the needs of households.

148. The number of plots and area of each plot of this resettlement site is as follows.

Table 24: Quantity of plots and area of each plot in RS

No Block Quantity of plots Area/plot (m2)

1 L1 26 80 - 110.7

2 L2 29 64.4 - 80

3 L3 3 90.8 - 97.87

4 L4 31 81 - 114.7

5 L5 58 80 - 89

6 L6 45 90 - 126

7 L7 30 55 - 63

8 L8 30 55 - 63

9 L9 30 55 - 63

10 L10 15 81 - 92

11 L18 16 81.2 - 100.5

12 L19 18 83 - 137.4

Total 331

149. The investor of the expanded resettlement site on West of University is Long Xuyen City People's Committee. Representative for investor is the Long Xuyen City Urban Upgrading Project Management Board. By working with Long Xuyen City Urban Upgrading Project Management Board, the construction progress of this resettlement site is expected as follows:

- Organizing tendering to select contractor to build resettlement site: April 2020;

- Executing and constructing resettlement site: June 2020

- Time to hand over the official resettlement plot: November 2020

150. On January 15, 2020, the People's Committee of Long Xuyen City issued Document No. 12/TTr-UBND to submit to the People's Committee of An Giang Province for approval


Page 66

the resettlement policy for the interconnecting road to NH91 and Long Xuyen City bypass project. Accordingly, the price of resettlement plot is determined to be 5,788,000 VND/m2; The level of support for the resettlement difference is: VND 2,419,000/m2 and the amount that people have to pay when they receive the resettlement plot is VND 3,369,000/m2. On 17/01/2020, An Giang Provincial People's Committee issued Decision No. 117/QD-UBND approving the resettlement policy for the interconnecting road to NH91 and Long Xuyen City bypass project.

8.2 Resettlement Demand

151. According to the initial survey results, the total number of relocated households in Long Xuyen city is 211 households. However, up to now, the total number of households under consideration for resettlement is 140 households (of which 119 households are fully acquired house and relocated and 21 households are acquired the only residential land plot in the affected commune/ward). All 140 AHs have the desire to receive plot in resettlement site. The reason households are willing to receive the resettlement plot is because they know that the price of the resettlement plot they have to pay is lower than the market price and therefore they will benefit more than choosing the self-relocation option.

152. Relocated households are eligible to receive plot in the resettlement site. However, in a household usually there are 2-3 households living together (the eldest children forming a family living with their parents), so when relocating, the city often arranged more resettlement plots, so the total the resettlement plot needs to be arranged for 140 households with 145 plots. In addition, if the acquired area is large or the remaining area is not sufficient for construction, the DPs will receive the resettlement land plot.

Table 25: Summary of resettlement demand

No Ward/commune

HHs are considered to allocate resettlement plot

Demand Total plots

need to be

allocated

Relocated house

Acquired the only residential

land plot Total

Receive plot in

RS

Self-relocation

1 My Thanh 10 2 12 12 0 12

2 My Thoi 3 0 3 3 0 3

3 My Quy 3 0 3 3 0 3

4 My Phuoc 11 3 14 14 0 14

5 My Hoa 62 7 69 69 0 71

6 My Khanh 8 2 10 10 0 10

7 Binh Khanh 10 0 10 10 0 10

8 Binh Duc 12 7 19 19 0 22

Total 119 21 140 140 0 145

Source: CLFD of Long Xuyen City

8.3 Impacts on the Host Community

153. The RS located in Long Xuyen City for the project are included in the master plan of the Long Xuyen city. As indicated above, the RS are built in areas where there are available infrastructures and public utility services as well as social services, such as health centers, schools, markets and commercial centers.

154. Following consultation with local government and project wards, the existing social infrastructures will have the capacity to absorb these new households in all the RS planned for Component 4.

Central Mekong Delta Connectivity Project - Component 4 Resettlement Plan

Page 67

Figure 3. Location of Resettlement Site in Long Xuyen City

The expanded resettlement site on West of University


Figure 4. Layout of the expanded resettlement site on West of Univesity


IX. INCOME RESTORATION MEASURES

9.1 General Provisions

155. The adverse impact on income is one of the most significant impact of resettlement for men and women. These impacts can be long lasting with inter-generational consequences. For linear impact projects losses of income commonly result from either having to physically relocate (e.g. causing loss of commercial, farming or other livelihood operation site) or significant reduction in livelihood base (as in partial loss of farming land). In some cases, the challenge is to re-establish pre-existing livelihoods in a new location while for others it may be having to adopt new income generating practices. The latter often includes farmers who either need to diversify income generating activities (e.g. adopt small scale trade to supplement farming) or intensify productivity on reduced areas of land. Restoration of income is one of the greatest challenges to successful post-resettlement rehabilitation. The success of resettlement planning in restoring living conditions is thus inextricably bound to income restoration and effective income restoration in turn necessitates a clear understanding of livelihoods, capacities and risks faced by those displaced. Completion of the project will bring direct and indirect benefits to Long Xuyen city people and Mekong Delta region via traffic connectivity. In addition, the project can generate negative impacts on livelihood of the affected people on the way getting used with new conditions.

156. A number of specific income restoration measures are already included in the entitlement matrix as summarized below:

Table 26: Income Restoration Measures already included in the component Resettlement Policy

Affected Livelihood Income Restoration Measures

Farmers Stabilization allowance (income support) for 6-24 months (cash allowance)

Income restoration allowance (equivalent to 3 times compensation rate per m2 for agriculture land (cash allowance)

Affected employees Compensation for 6 months lost income

Vulnerable Assistance to poor HH extended to all categories of vulnerable HH

157. Cash assistance, as described above, does not necessarily lead to stabilization of AHs. Therefore the implementation of an Income Restoration Program (IRP) is necessary. The IRP aims to provide supplemental assistance to severely affected HH and vulnerable, enhancing opportunities for them to improve incomes through training and provision of inputs. Household members in working age (including wife and their children) will be eligible for income restoration programs (such as vocational training).

9.2 Beneficiaries

158. A total of 442 households are eligible to the IRP. Household members in working age will be identified in detailed need assessment stage:



Page 70

Table 27: Number of households eligible for IRP

No Ward/commune

Number of households eligible for IRP

Relocated HH

Loss ≥ 10% total land holding

Affected business

HH

Vulnerable HH

Total9

1 My Thanh 10 38 0 7 46

2 My Thoi 3 51 0 3 53

3 My Quy 3 24 1 3 31

4 My Phuoc 11 45 1 7 54

5 My Hoa 62 57 4 46 123

6 My Khanh 8 50 2 10 56

7 Binh Khanh 10 10 1 6 20

8 Binh Duc 12 51 4 1 59

Total 119 326 13 83 442

Source: DMS, 2019

9.3 Demand Assessment

159. The results of the initial need assessment are as follow: (i) 261 HHs opted for support and training cultivation techniques to continue farming on their remaining land; (ii) 181 HHs opted to follow vocational training and job creation assistance for members in working age with unstable job.

160. During the implementation process, eligible households will be surveyed again about their need for income restoration activities. 8 meetings are planned in Quarter II to prepare a detailed need assessment during implementation.

9.4 The Proposed Income Restoration Program

9.4.1 The description of the program

161. IRP will be developed on the basis of the demand of the eligible households, experience and capacity of institutions that will provide public and private services in order to assist the income generation for local people as well as the existing (income) rehabilitation program available. The activities proposed as part of the income restoration/recovery programs include:

❖ Activity 1 - Support to Agriculture

162. 59% (261 HH) opted for support and training cultivation techniques to continue farming on their remaining land and livestock breeding. As per the IRP implemented for Components 1,2 and 3 of the CTURDP, the project will provide training on cultivation technique. The training will be provided by the Agriculture Extension Center of Long Xuyen City. Support (technical advice, follow-up) from Agriculture Extension Center and Farmer’s Union will also be provided to these affected HH.

❖ Activity 2 - Vocational training program

163. 41% (181 HHs) opted for vocational training and training courses on development of agricultural programs. After consulting with local authorities in project area, in Long Xuyen, the Employment Service Center of Long Xuyen City regularly organize consultancy and vocational training; find jobs and labor export, as well as conduct surveys on employment

9 A household can belong to many affected types


Page 71

needs and employment counseling for the beneficiaries. The Center receives applications from job seekers and introduces them to businesses and companies in An Giang province and other provinces such as Tien Giang, Long An, Ho Chi Minh City, Binh Duong, Dong Nai. Occupation: The Center often organizes the implementation of professional activities: sewing, assembling electronics, aquaculture, seafood processing, mechanical engineering, power industry, sales and accounting…

164. In addition, under Decision No. 63/2015/QD-TTg of the Prime Minister, people in working age whose land is acquired shall receive assistance in vocational training as follows:

a. Elementary training course with the duration of 3 months or less: specified in the Decision No. 46/2015/QD-TTg on assistance in short-term courses of elementary training dated September 28, 2015 by the Prime Minister;

b. Vocational schools or 3-year colleges: the worker shall receive funding for the tuition fee of the course.

c. The funding for tuition fee shall be equal to the tuition fee charged by the vocational schools and shall not exceed the maximum fee of public schools as promulgated in Vietnam law.

d. The funding for tuition fee shall be taken from budgets for training, occupation changing or job searching and shall be included in the total budget for the project investment, compensation or relocation plan, which has been approved.

e. The worker shall take a concessional loan for students.

165. Vocational training was a component of the IRP prepared for Components 1, 2 and 3 of the CMDCP and implemented between 2015 and 2017. Vocational Training was found successful especially in Can Tho City (Thot Not district) in the same area as Component 4 due to the presence of industrial parks. The table below presents the types and characteristics of these training courses.

Table 28: Vocational Training Courses in Long Xuyen City

Training course Training

time (month)

Tuition fee/course Lunch and travel allowance

Industrial garment 3-5 2,000,000 - 3,000,000VND/ trainee/month 50,000VND/trainee/day

Motorcycle and engine 6 2,000,000 - 3,000,000VND/

trainee/month 50,000VND/trainee/day

Electrical engineering, electrical tools, lathe tools,

electromechanical 6 2,000,000 - 3,000,000VND/


Repair of telephone, computer, TV 6 2,000,000 - 3,000,000VND/


Planting safe vegetables, breeding, growing

mushrooms 3-5 2,000,000 - 3,000,000VND/


❖ Activity 3: Job creation program

Assistance in job search in Vietnam



Page 72

166. The construction contractors for this project must prioritize the recruitment of local labor in AHs that meets the skill requirements of the civil works. CIPM will negotiate with construction contractors to provide appropriate employment for AHs in need of a job.

167. In addition, the vocational training centers (VTC) under the Department of Labor, War Invalid and Social Affairs in An Giang province is working effectively in training and introducing jobs for labors.

168. Implementation organization: Parallel to the dissemination of information on projects, disclosure and publicly posting information relating to compensation and assistance and resettlement, the project will also disseminate information on training programs to affected persons.

Assistance in overseas employment under contracts

169. The worker whose agriculture land is withdrawn shall receive assistance in working overseas under the Decree No. 61/2015/ND-CP regulating policies on assistance in job search and the National Employment Funds dated July 07, 2015 by the Government.

170. The funding for contractual workers in overseas prescribed in Clause 1 and Clause 2 of this Article shall be funded from the budgets for training, occupation changing or job searching and this funding shall be included in the total budget for the approved project investment, compensation or relocation.

171. The worker whose land is withdrawn in disadvantaged districts shall receive assistance in working overseas as promulgated in the policies on assistance for disadvantaged districts.

❖ Activity 4: Credit loan support

172. In the recent years, the Vietnam Bank for Social Policy (VBSP) - An Giang provincial branch regularly coordinated with other agencies, political and social organizations implementation of credit programs to provide preferential loans to poor households and other policy objects. So, many households have escaped from poverty, appearance of villages is changing and prosper.

173. The Vietnam Bank for Social Policy (VBSP) in An Giang province is implementing five credit programs: loans to poor households, jobs, labor export, students - students, clean water - sanitation in rural areas. These programs will provide 10 million VND/HH; agricultural/ commercial loans under the guarantee of farmers' unions, Women's Unions, Frontier Border Committees etc. are up to 30 million VND/HH. 174. In Long Xuyen City, Long Xuyen City People’s Committee manages the fund for credit program. Several organizations are involved (Women’s Union, Youth Union, Farmer’s Union). Women’s Union is coordinating the credit program.

175. During the implementation process, affected households will be surveyed again about their need for credit support. Households who require credit support should provide proofs that they are households affected by the project, including (i) resident registration book; (ii) relevant documents for compensation, or their copies certified by the ward. The Project will also assist these HH to get loans and to prepare application forms. CIPM will coordinate with the Vietnam Social Policy Bank to facilitate access to loans.

9.4.2 The funding for the Income Restoration Program

176. The funding for the implementation of the income restoration program is estimated about 8,501,035,300 VND (363,603 USD). This amount includes vocational training and management costs. The funding for the implementation of the IRP is outlined in the table


Page 73

below:

Table 29: The funding for the implementation of the income restoration program

No Proposed programs Estimated cost Note

1. Agriculture Support 4,552,927,500

11 classes of a maximum of 25 persons will be organized for the vocational training. The duration of the course is estimated at 5 months (see detailed budget in table 30).

2. Vocational training program 3,908,107,800

8 classes of a maximum of 25 persons will be organized for the vocational training. The duration of the course is estimated at 5 months (see detailed budget in table 30).

3. Job creation program

No costs for the project. The project will use existing program provided by Vocational Training Center

The program wil be opened to all eligible HH

4.

Credit Loan Program.

Based on the survey results, about 38% of households want to have access to loans and the loan amount is desired 50 million/household

No costs for the project. The project will use existing program (i.e. Vietnam Social Policy Bank)

This component will rely on existing programs from VSPB or other organizations (i.e. Women’s Union) in Long Xuyen City

Table 30: Detailed Budget for the IRP

No Action Class Qty Time

(Month) Tuition

fee/course VND

USD (1 USD = 23.380

VNĐ) 1 Agriculture component 4,552,927,500 194,736

- Training on agriculture 11 25 5 3,000,000 4,125,000,000 176,433

- Support from Agriculture center 5 5 8,558,550 213,963,750 9,152

- Support from Farmer's Union 5 5 8,558,550 213,963,750 9,152

2 Vocational Training component

3,908,107,800 167,156

- Short term training 6 months 8 25 6 3,000,000 3,600,000,000 153,978

- Support from Vocational Training Center

6 6 8,558,550 308,107,800 13,178

3 Meeting 8 5,000,000 40,000,000 1,711

4 Total IRP 8,501,035,300 363,603

9.5 Budget sources

177. The income restoration is seen as a special item that helps affected households regain their income or improve their economic situation. The budget for the IRP is taken from the ADB loan and is included in the total compensation costs of the project. During



Page 74

implementation, CIPM will reassess the need for livelihood restoration of affected households based on the actual situation and will update this income restoration programs to suit the needs of AHs10.

9.6 Organization and coordination in the implementation of IRP

178. The responsibilities of the organizations in the implementation of the IRP include: The PPC will allocate funds for the implementation of resettlement and compensation and the livelihood restore program. The PPC directs the relevant departments such as the Department of Labor, Invalids and Social Affairs, the Department of Planning and Investment, the Department of Agriculture and Rural Development etc.

- An Giang Province PC: Responsible for reviewing and approving the program; MOT will approve the final budget to be prepared during implementation.

- CIPM is responsible for implemention the contents of the income restoration program; directing the wards and the mass organizations during the implementation; and reporting the results of implementation to An Giang Province PC and to the ADB. CIPM is responsible for establishing a Livelihood Restoration Team to support and propose solutions for problems that may arise during the implementation process.

- The People’s Committees of the affected communes/wards: responsible for the introduction of household members of severely affected and vulnerable groups, who desire to find jobs in enterprises in the province provided that they meet the recruitment requirements; cooperate with CIPM and the Livelihood Restoration Team to design and implement the Livelihood Restoration Program.

- The mass organizations (Farmers’ Unions, Women's Unions, Veterans’ Unions, Youth’s Unions) are engaged in the dissemination of information and are responsible as mass organizations to link affected persons with the livelihood restoration program.

- Livelihood Restoration Team (LRT): CIPM will assign staff to coordinate with representatives of Labor, Invalids and Social Affairs Office, representatives of social organizations (Farmers 'Unions, Women's Unions, Veterans' Unions, Youth's Unions) and representatives of the People's Committees ward participating organizations to hold consultations and determine HHs’ official income recovery expectations; and to work with training institutions to identify unit cost and the contract terms to prepare then submit the program to the City and Province People's Committee for approval. LRT also coordinate and organize the program as well as reporting and supervising internally

- The vocational schools/training and job introduction centers of the Province/City: closely coordinate with the Livelihood Restoration Team to design and provide training courses under the approved program schedule.

- Independent Monitoring Agency: responsible for monitoring and evaluating the implementation of the Livelihood Restoration Program, reflecting all findings related to livelihood restoration of affected household in periodic monitoring reports and recommendations and adjustments, if necessary, for the program.

9.7 Implementation progress of the IRP

179. It is estimated that the IRP will be implemented after the payment of compensation for the AHs. The expected schedule is presented in Table 31 below. During the implementation process, affected households will be surveyed again about their need for income restoration.

10 The total budget and the way to transfer the budget for IRP implementation will be further discussed and agreed in the detailed report for IRP which will be submitted to ADB by Q2-Q3/2020.


Page 75

Households who require credit support should provide proofs that they are households affected by the project, including (i) resident registration book; (ii) relevant documents for compensation, or their copies certified by the ward.

Table 31: Expected schedule for the Implementation of the IRP

No. Work contents Time

1 Detailed Need Assessment to identify final choice of HH. Quarter II/2020

2 Organization and planning of each specific training program for affected households. Quarter II/2020

3 Preparation of the livelihood program. Quarter II/2020

4 Technical assistance to develop specific programs the affected households choose. Quarter II/2020

5 Implementation of income generation program for affected households. Quarter III/2020

6 Monitoring and technical assistance for affected households Quarter III/2020

7 Monitoring and evaluating the implementation of the program Quarter III/2020

9.8 Monitoring and Evaluation

180. The IRP will be regularly monitored by CIPM and the External Monitor Consultant and evaluation consultant every 6 months from the commencement until the end of the program. The objective of monitoring and evaluation is to examine the effective implementation of program activities in order to promptly adjust the proposed activities in order to meet the program's objectives. The content of monitoring and evaluation includes the following:

- Confirmation that participants in the program are eligible HH such as those severely affected by the project through loss of income from their main business of manufacturing/ producing and providing services and vulnerable households which were identified during the project preparation stage;

- Monitoring and evaluation of the organizational structure of the program;

- Monitoring and evaluation of the relevance and effectiveness of the program through secondary information collection from participating agencies, implementing units/organizations and interviews with the beneficiaries;

- Assessment of the level of recovery income through qualitative and quantitative interviews on the scale of household participation in the program;

- The lessons learned from the program implementing process for propagation and

publication.



Page 76

X. RESETTLEMENT BUDGET AND FINANCING PLAN

10.1 Budget source

181. Costs for land acquisition, compensation and resettlement under this uRP will financed from the ADB loan. Noted that relocation sites will be covered by funds of PC of An Giang province and PC of Long Xuyen city.

10.2 Survey on replacement cost

182. As required in the ADB SPS, a survey on the replacement cost is required to be the basis for calculating replacement prices for all impacts on land, crops, aquaculture products, assets and structures

10.3 Methodology for determining value of losses and compensation

183. The important objective of replacement cost study is to ensure compensation rates for all affected assets at replacement cost. This objective can be achieved through surveys of market and/or other elements such as production capacity, equivalents, values of replacement assets, and disadvantages of affected people, etc. and simultaneous comparison with and evaluation of compensation rates issued by Provincial People’s Committees. In particular, the following activities have to be undertaken:

- Determination of current land price;

- Determination of current price for plants and crops;

- Determination of current unit prices of materials houses and structures and labor costs.

- Preparation of replacement cost solutions for land, assets, trees and crops as of the date of replacement cost survey.

184. Two consulting agencies have been hired to survey the replacement cost for land, house/structure11. The method of land price appraisal is based on the direct comparison method, the land price adjustment coefficient method in accordance with the 2013 Land Law and the Circulars guiding the implementation of the Land Law. These consulting agencies include:

- Dong Duong Appraisal and Investment Consultant JSC: (i) Land price: This company is assigned to appraise land prices in July 2019 with the task of surveying land prices in My Thanh, My Thoi, My Quy, My Phuoc, My Hoa wards, Long Xuyen City, An Giang province. On July 29, 2019 this company issued appraisal certificate No. 034/ ĐD-MT.1907; (ii) Prices of houses and structures: This company is assigned to evaluate the prices of houses and structure in 8 affected commune/wards. On December 25, 2019, this company issued appraisal certificate No. 070/BĐS-MT.1912;

- The Southern Information and Valuation Corporation: This company is assigned to appraise land prices in August 2019 with the task of surveying land prices in My Khanh commune, Binh Khanh, Binh Duc wards, Long Xuyen City, An Giang province. On August 05, 2019 this company issued appraisal certificate No. Vc 19/18/13/DGD.

- In addition, when announcing the compensation price for land, some households have not yet agreed on the compensation price for residential land in some locations

11 Compensation price for tree/crop: propose to apply the compensation price prescibled by Decision No.08/2018/QĐ-UBND dated on 04 April, 2018 by An Giang PPC


Page 77

in My Thanh, My Khanh, Binh Khanh, and Binh Duc wards. Therefore, CLFD of Long Xuyen City has asked Dong Duong Appraisal and Investment Consultant JSC to re-examine residential land prices at these locations. On December 25, 2019, the company issued appraisal certificate No. 069/ĐGĐ-MT.1912 which adjusts residential land prices at some of these locations. This adjusted unit price has been submitted to the People's Committee of An Giang Province.

10.4 Results of Brief Survey on Replacement Cost

Compensation rate for land:

185. Based on the results of the land price replacement surveys prepared by the Consultant, the Appraisal Committee of An Giang Provincial People's Committee chaired by the Department of Natural Resources and Environment of An Giang province organized a meeting to review land prices. On September 5, 2019, Department of Natural Resources and Environment issued the submission No. 354/TTr-STNMT to submit to the provincial People's Committee for approval of replacement cost for the land. The replacement cost for land applied for this Project is 1.93 - 13.88 times higher than the issued land price of the Provincial People's Committee. On September 10, 2019, People’s Committee of An Giang province issued Decision No.2176/QD-UBND to approve replacement cost for land for the internecting road to NH91 and Long Xuyen bypass project.

Table 32: The applied replacement cost for land

No Type of land Provincial price

(VND/m2) Applied replacement

cost (VND/m2) Adjustment coefficient

I My Thanh ward

1 Residential land at location 1 at Muong Khai road (right bank of Hai De bridge - bridge of Ba Huynh residential area)

420,000 1,267,00012 3.02

2 Residential land at location 1 at Acera Brick Factory (the remaining section)

1,000,000 1,933,000 1.93

3 Residential land at location 1 at Tam Bo bridge road - adjacent to Vinh Trinh commune

300,000 967,00013 3.22

4 Residential land at location 1 at Dinh bridge road - adjacent to Vinh Trinh commune

350,000 1,189,000 3.40

5 Annual land (the remaining area)

80,000 307,000 3.84

6 Aquaculture land (the remaining area)

108,000 390,000 3.61

7 Perennial land (the remaining area)

100,000 383,000 3.83

12 The land price at this location, after re-investigation, has proposed a new adjusted price of 1,915,000 VND/m2




Page 78




II My Thoi ward

1 Residential land at location 1 along Cai Sao canal road (Nga Bat canal - Bang Tang canal (Cai Sao canal below))

500,000 3,228,000 6.46

2 Residential land at location 1 along Goi Be canal road (Ba Mieu bridge - adjacent to Phu Thuan commune)

600,000 4,687,000 7.81

3 Annual land (the remaining area)

80,000 310,000 3.88

4 Annual land (the remaining area) from Chin Xe canal to boundary of My Quy ward

80,000 402,000 5.03

5 Aquaculture land (the remaining area)

108,000 419,000 3.88


100,000 389,000 3.89

III My Quy ward

1 Residential land at location 1 along Kenh Dao canal road

300,000 3,250,000 10.83

2 Annual land, aquaculture land (the remaining area)

70,000 402,000 5.74


100,000 573,000 5.73

IV My Phuoc ward

1 Residential land at location 1 at Kenh Dao canal road (Vanh Dai Trong road to Xeo Trom residential area)

300,000 4,163,000 13.88


70,000 402,000 5.74


100,000 573,000 5.73

V My Hoa ward

1 Residential land at location 1 at Provincial Road 943 (section of Muong Diem bridge - Bang Tang bridge)

4,000,000 10,409,000 2.60

2 Residential land at location 1 along Muong Diem canal road (PR 943 to 300 m) (map sheet 36, parcel 267))

1,500,000 3,912,000 2.61

3 Perennial land (from the existing footpath of PR 943 to 300 m to the South)

158,000 1,013,000 6.41

4 Annual land, aquaculture land 135,000 865,000 6.41


Page 79




(from the existing footpath of PR 943 to 300 m to the South)


100,000 573,000 5.73


100,000 402,000 4.02

VI My Khanh commune

1 Residential land at location 1 at inter-commune road (Thong Luu bridge - Muong Chen bridge)

1,500,000 3,014,00014 2.01


50,000 252,000 5.04


100,000 413,000 4.13

VII Binh Khanh ward

1 Residential land at location 1 at Tra On canal road (section from Sau Hanh iron bridge - Tam Vu market)

700,000 3,002,00015 4.29

2 Annual land, aquaculture land (Tong Hoi canal - Long Xuyen bypass)

65,000 302,000 4.65


100,000 465,000 4.65

VIII Binh Duc ward

1 Residential land at location 1 at Tran Hung Dao street (from Ap Chien Luoc raod - Can Xay bridge)

4,500,000 11,252,000 2.50

2 Residential land at location 1 of the asphalted and concreted roads in ward

1,000,000 2,879,00016 2.88

3 Perennial land adjacent to Tran Hung Dao street

158,000 1,040,000 6.58

4 Perennial land not adjacent to Tran Hung Dao street

158,000 732,000 4.63


100,000 463,000 4.63






Page 80




6 Annual land 135,000 520,000 3.85

7 Annual land (east bank of Cay Dong canal)

60,000 278,000 4.63

8 Aquaculture land 108,000 500,000 4.63

Compensation rate for house/structure

186. In December 2019, the Consultant has surveyed the market price for houses and structures and currently the Department of Construction is appraising and will submit to the Provincial People's Committee for approval in January 2019. The market price for the surveyed houses or structures is equivalent to the compensation price specified in Decision No.10/2018/QD-UBND dated April 4, 2018 of An Giang People's Committee; and some works/structures not included in the price list of this Decision, the Consultant has surveyed and proposed the applicable price as follows. Department of Construction of An Giang province is apprasing this proposal.

Table 33: Market prices for houses and structures proposed to apply for the Project

No Name of asset Unit

Unit price as prescribed in

Decision 08/2018/QD-UBND dated 04/04/2018

(VND)

Market price proposed to apply (VND)

Note

1 House type 3.1 m2 3,852,000 3,852,000

2 House type 3.2 m2 3,544,000 3,544,000

3 House type 3.3 m2 2,773,000 2,773,000

4 House type 3.4 m2 2,311,000 2,311,000

5 House type 3.5 m2 1,849,000 1,849,000

6 Temporary house B m2 1,310,000 1,310,000

7 Temporary house A m2 1,008,000 1,008,000

8 Tent m2 770,000 770,000

9 Approach bridge type 1 m2 832,000 832,000


11 Approach bridge type 3 m2 Not mentioned 379,045


13 Yard type 1 m2 123,300 123,300

14 Yard type 2 m2 Not mentioned 240,875

15 Wall type 1 m2 925,000 925,000

16 Wall type 2 m2 739,000 739,000

17 Wall type 3 m2 647,000 647,000

18 Wall type 4 m2 556,000 556,000

19 Wall type 5 m2 277,000 277,000

20 Wall type 6 m2 Not mentioned 283,925


Page 81




(VND)


Note

21 Wall type 7 m2 Not mentioned 283,925

22 Fence type 1 m2 Not mentioned 322,875

23 Fence type 2 m2 Not mentioned 297,250

24 Toilet type 1 m2 6,471,000 6,471,000

25 Toilet type 2 m2 5,238,000 5,238,000

26 Toilet type 3 m2 3,698,000 3,698,000

27 Septic tank m2 Not mentioned 2,152,500

28 Earth tomb each 6,163,000 6,163,000

29 Concreted grave each 9,245,000 9,245,000

30 Stairs type 1 m2 339,000 339,000

31 Stairs type 2 m2 262,000 262,000

32 Stairs type 3 m2 431,000 431,000

33 Water tank, type 1 m3 2,774,000 2,774,000

34 Water tank, type 2 m3 3,390,000 3,390,000

35 Electric meter type 1 each 1,295,000 1,295,000

36 Electric meter type 2 each 1,295,000 1,295,000

37 Rural electric meter each 1,665,000 1,665,000

38 Urban water meter each 462,000 462,000

39 Rural water meter each 739,000 739,000

40 Roof type 1 m2 Not mentioned 694,540



43 Roof type 4 m2 Not mentioned 1,421,419


45 Eaves type 1 m2 Not mentioned 694,540



48 Beam m3 Not mentioned 1,570,710

49 Internet each Not mentioned 205,000

50 Cable TV each Not mentioned 3,075,000

51 Well each Not mentioned 205,000

52 Iron pillar each Not mentioned 205,000

53 Heavenly pillar each Not mentioned 205,000 Support for relocation

54 Tomb each Not mentioned 205,000 Support for



Page 82




(VND)


Note

relocation

55 Cast iron antenna each Not mentioned 205,000 Support for relocation

56 Energy water heater each Not mentioned 205,000 Support for relocation

57 Dale plate Not mentioned 12,000 Support for relocation

58 Volume of earthworks m3 Not mentioned 169,125

59 Volume of sand leveling m3 Not mentioned 169,125

60 Centrifugal concrete electric pole each Not mentioned 697,000 Support for relocation

61 Iron frame supporting water tank each Not mentioned 205,000 Support for relocation

62 Vinaphone BTS station Not mentioned 55,500,000

63 Gate m2 Not mentioned 729,493

64 Concreted wall type 1 m2 Not mentioned 663,175

65 Concreted wall type 2 m2 Not mentioned 862,128

66 Brick m2 Not mentioned 347,475

67 Tiled the floor m2 Not mentioned 101,500

68 Excavation volume m3 Not mentioned 20,068

69 Crypt m2 Not mentioned 3,238,000

70 House type > 3.1 m2 Not mentioned 5,403,000

71 Alcohol production furnace each Not mentioned 1,530,000

72 Penjing m2 Not mentioned 665,000

73 Tiling marble m2 Not mentioned 1,426,000

Compensation rates for crops and livestock

187. For tree/crop and lovestock, The People's Committee of An Giang Province issued Decision No. 08/2018/QD-UBND dated April 4, 2018 promulgating the regulation on compensation for tree/crop and livestocks upon the State recovers land in An Giang province. This unit price is issued based on the market price survey results of An Giang Department of Agriculture and Agricultural Development. Because there is no change in prices of tree/crop and lovestock in An Giang province; Therefore, CLFD of Long Xuyen City proposed to apply compensation prices for crops and livestock under Decision No. 08/2018/QD-UBND dated April 4, 2018 of An Giang People's Committee to calculate compensation for this project. Through discussing with HHs when disclosing the drafted compensation plans, all HHs agreed with compensation rates for tree/crop.

10.5 Cost estimate for compensation, assistance

188. Cost estimate for uRP implementation includes:


Page 83

a. Cost for the compensation, assistance and resettlement: based on entitlements described in the entitlement matrix.

b. Cost for independent monitoring and income restoration program:

- Cost of independent monitoring of uRP implementation is estimated at 20% of the resettlement implementation and management costs.

c. Cost for compensation, assistance and resettlement included costs of detailed measurement survey, land acquisition documentation, independent valuation cost, etc. It is estimated at 2% in maximum of total cost of compensation and restoration support.

d. Contingency: The rate for contingency should be at about 10.8% of total cost of compensation and uRP preparation. The contingency will be used in cases of adjusted compensation rates due to inflation, or any adjustments during implementation of the approved uRP.

189. Total estimated cost for implementation of uRP for the project is VND 503,872,582,000 (equivalent to US$ 21,551,000, exchange rate: 1USD = 23,380 USD). This cost includes the estimated cost of income restoration program and external monitoring. Table 34 presents the summary of the costs estimates.

Table 34: Summary of Cost Estimates

No Item Amount (VND)

A Land (including residential, agricultural, aquacultural land) 206,744,618,416

B Tree, crop and livestock 3,585,568,000

C House, structure 32,401,884,898

D Public works 55,500,000

E Allowances 159,959,494,155

F Allowance for resettlement differences 28,499,055,700

G Incentive bonus 5,930,000,000

H TOTAL H = (A+B+C+D+E+F+G) 437,176,121,169

I Management cost I = 2%*H 8,742,412,423

J Contigencies J =10.8%*H 47,215,021,086

K TOTAL RESETTLEMENT K = H + I + J 493,134,664,679

L OTHER EXPENSES 10,737,916,995

1 External monitoring 2,236,881,695

2 Income Restoration Program 8,501,035,300

M TOTAL M = K + L 503,872,581,674

Rounded (VND) 503,872,582,000

Exchange rate (1 USD = 23,380 VND) 21,551,436

Rounded (USD) 21,551,000



Page 84

XI. IMPLEMENTATION ORGANIZATION

11.1 Executing agency

190. The Ministry of Transport (MOT) is the executing agency (EA) and will oversee all subproject activities including uRP.

11.2 Cuu Long Corporation for Investment, Development and Project Management of Infrastructure (CIPM)

191. The Cuu Long CIPM is the Project Management Unit established under the EA. CIPM will take a very active role in the preparation and implementation of the Project, including uRP implementation. One social/ resettlement specialist will be employed full time on the project during resettlement preparation and implementation stages.

192. CIPM has been working closely with local administrative authorities, regarding resettlement planning and implementation. Together with the DDIS Consultants, the CIPM will continue to work closely with the administrative authorities and concerned departments by providing technical plans, designs and project activities and schedule of the proposed project in order for all parties to identify and minimize the potential effects on land and people and to make sure that all RP activities are properly addressed and implemented prior to construction activities. The CIPM will be responsible for the preparation of quarterly resettlement progress reports.

11.3 PC of An Giang Province

193. An Giang Provincial People’s Committee (PPC) is responsible for resettlement activities within its administrative jurisdiction. The main responsibilities of PPC include:

Approving the final updated RP;

Issuing decisions approving the replacement costs for land, house/structute, tree/crop/animal applied for compensation rates, allowances and other supports to APs, especially vulnerable groups, based on principles of RP;

Approving and allocating budget for compensation, support and resettlement;

Directing and supervising provincial relevant departments to implement effectively the RP.

Authorizing the District People’s Committees to approve compensation, assistance and resettlement plans;

Directing the relevant agencies to settle APs’ complaints, grievances related to compensation, assistance and resettlement according to current law;

Directing the relevant agencies to examine and handle the violations in the compensation, assistance, and resettlement.

11.4 PC of Long Xuyen City

194. The PC of Long Xuyen City is responsible for comprehensive management on compensation, assistance, and resettlement. It is also PC of Long Xuyen City responsibility to report the progress as well as results of land acquisition to PPC. Specifically, the PC of Long Xuyen City will be responsible for the following tasks:


Page 85

Approving the plan and monitor the progress of land acquisition - resettlement in accordance with updated RP;

Establishing RC; directing RC and relevant stakeholders to appraise and implement detailed compensation plan;

Approving and taking responsibility before the law on legal basics and accuracy of detailed compensation plan at locality; approving estimate for detailed compensation plan implementation;

Taking responsibility for revoking LURC, land ownership certificate of AHs and APs who own land, house being acquired and modifying LURC for AHs/APs being acquired land partially;

Directing CPC and relevant stakeholders to implement resettlement activities;

Redressing grievances of AHs

11.5 Resettlement committee

195. The resettlement committee (RC) will be established under decision of Can Tho city people’s committee and Long Xuyen city people’s committee. The RC’s role includes activities namely: (i) cooperating with CIPM and WPC/CPC to manage resettlement activities; (ii) surveying and monitoring the DMS; (iii) conducting public consultation and information dissemination activities; (iv) developing and implementing income restoration programs; (v) working with local government to deliver compensation and other entitlements promptly to the affected persons and (vi) playing the role of a member in the grievance redress board.

11.6 Centre for Land Fund Development (CLFD)

196. Centre for Land Fund Development of Long Xuyen City (CLFD) is established under the People’s Committee of An Giang Province and has a mandate covering issues of compensation, resettlement and rehabilitation when the state acquires land. For this project, CLFD will be responsible for cooperating with CIPM and other relevant agencies to prepare and implement the resettlement plan. The city/province CLFD will monitor the implementation of the DMS and will establish database on the affected households including lost assets and affected income sources, as well as compensation, resettlement and allowances. The centre will be responsible for establishing and constructing the resettlement site.

197. Regarding the compensation, the city/province CLFD will work closely with project ward PC/communal PC to do following tasks:

Prepare individual “AH Compensation Forms” which detail all types of losses with its corresponding established compensation rates. This will also include all types of relocation and rehabilitation assistance.

Inform AHs regarding payment schedule at least two (2) weeks in advance.

Present proposed compensation amounts to AHs and explain in detail the AH’s rights and entitlements based on Project policies and explain how compensation amounts were calculated.

If compensation payments are acceptable to AHs, process payment and inform AHs of exact date of release of payment.



Page 86

Affect compensation payment. Copies of compensation payment documents will be provided to AHs. Copies will also be provided to DDIS Consultants and external agency for monitoring and reporting.

Prepare and update regularly a database and lists of AHs, including information regarding disbursement dates for monitoring purposes.

Send prior notification on site clearance before AHs get compensation.

11.7 PC of commune/ward

198. PC of commune/ward will support RC to implement their responsibilities in resettlement activities. In particular, PC of commune/ward will be responsible for the following task:

Coordinating with agencies at communal and district/town levels to mobilize officials in charge of implementing compensation, assistance and resettlement in compliance with approved uRP;

Coordinating with RC and working groups to disseminate the reason why land acquisition is needed to the people whose land being acquired; Informing and publicizing all resettlement options on compensation, assistance and resettlement which are approved by DPC;

Assigning communal officials supporting RC in updating RP and implementing resettlement activities;

Signing compensation agreement forms with AHs;

Supporting in redressing grievances; and

Active participating in all activities related to resettlement.

Monitor and register new settlers in the area. The local authorities will be responsible for informing residents and new settlers not to construct houses/structures in the areas where there will be improvement/ construction

11.8 Local mass organizations

199. Related local mass organizations will also participate in implementing and establishing supportive methods. These organizations include community-based organizations in Vietnam (CBO), including Fatherland front, Women union, Farmer union and other organizations operating in the project area.

Cooperate with relevant agencies to arrange vocational training courses for affected households.

Cooperate with other agencies to provide supports relating to consumption output of agricultural products and to arrange training courses for farmers as well as other income generation activities.

Support the social program budget to ensure benefits for affected households.

11.9 Detailed Design and Implementation Support (DDIS) Consultant

200. DDIS will include one international resettlement specialist and one local resettlement specialist to support and monitor regularly social activities related to resettlement. Responsibility of the consultant includes:

Work closely with CIPM, Centre for Land Fund Development, local authorities and Resettlement Committees on all resettlement-related activities;

Assist in the conduct of the information campaigns and community participation;


Page 87

Assist in the verification of inventory of losses and detailed measurement survey activities;

Check the accuracy of the AH database prepared and provide improvements if necessary;

Assist in the preparation of an updated RP;

Assist and improve, if necessary, procedures for the coordination of resettlement and compensation activities;

Ensure that grievances are addressed promptly and properly and that grievance redress mechanism is functioning well;

Provide necessary training on grievance if needed;

Establish and implement liaison mechanisms to ensure proper technical and logistical support to CIPM, local administrative authorities, resettlement committees and concerned government departments;

Establish and implement procedures for ongoing internal monitoring;

Design and deliver capacity development activities for all relevant agencies, as needed, in the areas of ADB resettlement policy; participation and communication; gender and development; and livelihood restoration



Page 88

XII. IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE

12.1 Resettlement activities

Establishment of Resettlement plan implementation board

201. CLFD will be signed a contract for conducting the compensation, support and resettlement and will take responsibility for land acquisition for handing over to the projects.

Conduct of the detailed measurement survey (DMS)

202. Detailed Measurement Survey (DMS) will be undertaken, following final design, by the CLFD in coordination with local authorities at ward/commune levels. The DMS data, together with the result of the replacement cost study as reviewed and approved by the EA, will be the basis of preparation of the Compensation Plans. At the time of DMS activities, all AHs are required to submit copies of LURCs or any legal papers to assist CLFD in the preparation of the Compensation Plan. All DMS forms are to be reviewed and signed by AHs. Each household keeps one copy. AHs will be informed of their right to note any objections to the DMS assessment on the form.

Public consultation and information disclosure

203. The official list of AHs, their losses, and corresponding payments due will be disclosed to the affected people. Any disagreement on the DMS and Compensation Plan will not be signed by the respective AH until it is resolved either through direct discussion with relevant agency or following the grievance redress process. During the DMS, data collection will incorporate criteria to identify vulnerable persons beyond those who fall below the official poverty level. Such other vulnerable groups would include female headed households (especially those with high dependency ratios, those with low incomes and those whose livelihoods are affected), elderly residing alone, disabled and landless households.

Independent appraisal of land price

204. CIPM, with the support of the CLFD, District/city Resettlement Committee and the resettlement consultant of the project has conducted the survey on the market price for affected land and assets to determine replacement cost. The replacement costs will be submitted to PPC for approval. The replacement cost survey results will be the basis for the development of the compensation plan for submission to PC of Long Xuyen City for approval.

Preparation of detailed compensation, support and resettlement plan

205. The CLFD, and the Resettlement Committee of Long Xuyen City will be responsible for preparing specific compensations for individual affected household based on results of the DMS, Replacement Cost survey and the entitlement matrix. The compensation plan also includes one detailed plan for payment of compensation, displacement and site clearance.

Notification on payment

206. Compensation and allowances will be paid to the affected households before construction process. The payment process will be under supervision of representatives of local governments (ward/commune PC) and affected households

Internal monitoring and external monitoring

207. The monitoring work will be started as soon as possible and will continue during the project construction process. CIPM will carry out regular internal monitoring. Independent monitoring consultant will conduct periodic monitoring once in 6 months and will submit monitoring reports to ADB. CIPM will be responsible for implementing mitigation plan under suggestion by the independent monitoring consultant to mitigate difference between the fact and the resettlement plan.


Page 89

12.2 Implementation plan

208. The updated RP is prepared based on detailed design of the project. All resettlement activities will be in compliance with construction schedule. Whenever the uRP is approved by ADB, land acquisition and displacement will be conducted.

209. Construction is not allowed at the affected area until all compensation and assistance have been paid completely and certified by the independent monitoring Consultant. It is expected that all resettlement activities of this project will be completed in the first 2 years of the project implementation as follows.

Table 35: Implementation schedule

Activities Schedule

Conduct detailed measurement survey May - August 2019

Replacement cost survey July - August 2019

Prepare drafted detailed the compensation plans Nov 2019

Updating RP and submit uRP to ADB Feb 2020

ADB approval for updated RP Feb 2020

Approve compensations plan March 2020

Payment of compensation, assistance March - May 2020

Hand over of acquired land Quarter II/2020

Start of Construction Quarter III/2020



Page 90

XIII. MONITORING AND REPORTING

13.1 Objectives

210. The objectives of the monitoring program are (i) to ensure that the standard of living of AHs are restored or improved; (ii) to monitor whether the overall project and resettlement objectives are being met; (iii) to assess if rehabilitation measures and compensation are sufficient; (iv) to identify problems and risks; and (v) to identify measures to mitigate problems.

13.2 Internal monitoring

211. CIPM is responsible for internal monitoring for the implementation of the resettlement plan. CIPM, with support of DDIS, will monitor and manage resettlement activities and implementation arrangements. 212. CIPM will submit the quarterly report to ADB. CIPM will ensure that reports prepared by DDIS will be included in the progress report of CIPM. Implementation of resettlement plan, information on affected area, affected persons and compensation amount for individual items, support for people etc. will also be included in the progress reports. 213. Objectives of the monitoring program are (i) to ensure that living condition of affected people is restored and improved; (ii) to monitor achievement of the overall objectives of the project and the resettlement plan; (iii) to evaluate sufficiency of the methods for improvement and compensation; (iv) to address potential risks and issues; (v) to determine mitigation measures. 214. Scope of activities and issues to be addressed and verified includes:

Payment of compensation and allowance, implementation of supporting methods;

Re-construction of housing and business places for affected households;

Response of affected households, particularly to resettlement and compensation activities; and

Income restoration/improvement.

215. The principal indicators for internal monitoring of resettlement activities include the following:

Timely and complete disbursement of compensation to AHs according to the compensation policy agreed in the uRP;

Timely and complete delivery of rehabilitation allowances and assistance measures;

Land allocation and construction of serviced resettlement sites;

Public information dissemination and consultation procedures;

Adherence to grievance procedures and identification of outstanding issues that require further attention and resolution;

Completion of resettlement sites;

Completion of resettlement activities required before the award of civil works contracts.

Participation of poor and vulnerable HH throughout the process;

Restoration and improvement of socioeconomic conditions of AHs;


Page 91

216. On a quarterly basis, CIPM will prepare a resettlement monitoring report. The report will be submitted to ADB. The scope of the report will include:

The number of AHs by category of impact and the status of compensation payments,

The amount of funds allocated and disbursed for a) resettlement program operations and b) compensation, assistance and resettlement activities.

The activities, levels of participation, outcomes and issues of the Information Dissemination and Consultation Program.

The status and outcomes of complaints and grievances and any outstanding issues requiring further attention by provincial or district authorities, or ADB assistance.

Implementation problems, including delays, insufficient funds, etc.; proposed remedial measures; and, revised resettlement implementation schedule.

13.3 External supervision

217. ADB will hire an independent External Monitor consultant (EMC) to monitor the implementation of the uRP. The EMC should be mobilized soon before the implementation of DMS. The main objectives of external resettlement monitoring are:

To verify the results of internal monitoring reports prepared by CIPM and Resettlement Committee of Long Xuyen City;

To examine whether provision of compensation and other agreed forms of assistance complies with the approved uRP;

To assess whether supplemental assistance measures have been provided in accordance with the IRPs, and the extent to which they have been effective in restoring incomes and living standards for severely affected households;

To assess the effectiveness, impact and sustainable level of resettlement management agencies and procedures;

To propose necessary adjustments in the implementation of RP and IRPs to improve implementation effectiveness.

218. Strategic lessons for future policy formulation and planning will also be drawn from the monitoring and evaluation of resettlement. This is possible through a Post-Resettlement Implementation Evaluation Study that will be carried out carry out 6-12 months following completion of all resettlement activities. 219. The Independent monitoring consultant will cover specific issues such as, but not be limited to, the following:

Public consultation and disclosure activities;

Awareness of affected people on resettlement rights and entitlements, grievance redress, resettlement process, and project schedule;

Establishment of market rates for land and non-land assets;

Documentation of impacts and payments (DMS, compensation documents,) as per agreed uRP;

Coordination of resettlement activities with construction schedule;

Land recovery and transfer procedures;

Relocation of households, public assets, and sacred structures;



Page 92

Quality of preparation and adequacy of planned relocation sites;

Level of satisfaction of AHs with the provisions and implementation of the uRP;

Effectiveness and efficiency of grievance redress mechanism (documentation, process, resolution);

Effectiveness, impact and sustainability of entitlements and rehabilitation measures/income restoration programs, and the need for further improvement, as required;

Gender impacts and strategy;

Capacity of AHs to restore/re-establish livelihoods and living standards, especially the severely affected, poor and vulnerable households. Monitor and assess the assistance and support provided or to be provided to these households;

Unanticipated impacts, or any resettlement impacts caused during construction activities;

Participation of AHs in uRP planning, updating and implementation;

Institutional capacity, internal monitoring and reporting;

Channeling of government funds for payment of land, non-land assets and allowances to the affected households (if done transparently, efficiently, and effectively);

Integration with host community;

Restoration/improvement of affected public, communal, and community assets.

220. Monitoring of uRP implementation will be based on desk review and field visits, meetings with various ministries and local officials, and affected households. Review baseline data that was collected under the socio-economic survey during uRP preparation and updating to assess changes in: household income and expenditures, expenditure composition patters, primary and secondary occupations, borrowing amounts and debts patterns, materials conditions and possessions of consumer items, land area and tenure arrangements, school attendance of children, health, and distances to public services and infrastructure. Additional survey may be carried out as necessary. Separate meetings will be held with women and vulnerable households. Monitoring indicators and findings will be disaggregated by gender. 221. The External Monitor Consultant (EMC) will be recruited before DMS. 222. Monitoring reports will also include a summary of outstanding issues and how these issues were addressed, and if there are still outstanding issues that require further action, including a number of case studies that require follow-up monitoring. If the findings indicate that RP objectives have not been achieved, the external monitor will propose appropriate alternative actions or approaches. The reports will also describe any good practice and lessons learned that may be useful for future activities. 223. The EMC will submit semi-annual monitoring report to ADB and CIPM within two weeks after completion of the monitoring activity. The type of reports to be submitted to CIPM and ADB are: (i) Inception Report; (ii) Semi-annual Monitoring Reports; and (iii) Post evaluation Report. ToR for the EMC are presented in Appendix 13.


Page 93

XIV. APPENDIXES

Appendix 1: Resettlement Policy Framework Approval Decision



Page 94

Appendix 2: Decision on assigning tasks to be as an investor of land acquisition

subproject of the project of the interconnecting road to NH91 and Long Xuyen City by

pass


Page 95



Page 96


Page 97

Appendix 3: Approval Decision for replacement cost for land



Page 98


Page 99



Page 100


Page 101



Page 102


Page 103

Appendix 4: Submission for appraisal the compensation price for house, structure



Page 104

Appendix 5: Submission for revision of compensation rates for residential land at some locations


Page 105



Page 106


Page 107

Appendix 6: Proposal some compensation policies for the project of the interconnecting road to NH91 and Long Xuyen City bypass



Page 108


Page 109



Page 110


Page 111

Appendix 7: Proposal by DONRE and approval by PPC of compensation and support policy



Page 112


Page 113



Page 114

Appendix 8: Adjustment approved decision (the first time) for investment project of the expanded resettlement site on West of University


Page 115



Page 116


Page 117



Page 118


Page 119



Page 120


Page 121



Page 122


Page 123



Page 124

Appendix 9: Submission to propose resettlement policy and approval decision by PPC


Page 125



Page 126


Page 127



Page 128

Appendix 10: List of affected housholds

# HH

NAME

AFFECTED LAND (M2) AL MAIN HOUSE

Nb

Plo

ts A

llo

ca

ted

An

nu

al

Pe

ren

nia

l

Aq

ua

cu

ltu

re

Res

ide

nti

al

Oth

er

To

tal

Aff

etc

ed

AL

% A

L l

os

t

Cate

go

ry

Are

a a

ffe

cte

d

Bu

ilt

on

oth

er

ow

ne

r la

nd

Fu

lly

(1

) o

r P

art

ially

(2

)

I PHƯỜNG MỸ THẠNH

1 Nguyễn Thị Thanh Trúc 8,356.9 1,290.7 70.0 - - 17,560.6 9,717.6 55.3%

2 Nguyễn Văn Minh - Phạm Thị Tuyết 7,709.8 856.1 - 600.0 21,717.4

8,565.9 39.4% Temp 14.79 1 1

3 Bùi Thị Giang Hà - Trần Đức 729.0 4,566.0 729.0 16.0%

4 Phùng Thành Được 3,644.7 4,706.2 3,644.7 77.4%

5 Hồ Anh Vũ (Đại diện) bà Nguyễn Thị Mối (đã chết) 221.0 4,329.6

221.0 5.1%

6 Trần Ngọc Phương 943.1 1,300.0 943.1 72.5% Temp 52.47 1 1

7 Trần Anh Dũng - Nguyễn Thị Tiền 2,970.2

3,907.0 2,970.2 76.0%

8 Trần Văn Luận - Huỳnh Thị Ánh 2,479.1 22,420.0 2,479.1 11.1%

9 Phạm Văn Nao - Trần Kim Phụng

431.8 1,994.6 431.8 21.6%

10 Phạm Công Tôn 3,613.3 973.1 30,506.7 4,586.4 15.0%

11 Nguyễn Văn Ẩn - Nguyễn Thị Tư 979.5 8,016.0

979.5 12.2%

12 Mai Phú Toàn - Lê Thị Mỹ Liên 2,888.8 15,812.1 2,888.8 18.3%

13 Nguyễn Văn Muốn - Lê Thị Chính 1,001.3 533.3 1,692.5

1,534.6 90.7%

14 Nguyễn Văn Tá - Nguyễn Kim Út 831.3 5,424.0

831.3 15.3%


Page 129

15 Hồ Thị Quẻn - Trần Văn Me - - - 90.0 - - 0.0%

16 Lê Văn Hà - Lê Thị Tiềng Giang 451.8 - 0.0% C4 71.5 1 1

17 Nguyễn Văn Thiết - Võ Thị Khuyên

99.4 600.0

699.4 99.4 14.2%

Không có

nhà

1

18 Nguyễn Văn Hôi 421.9 600.0 1,000.2 421.9 42.2% C4 75.32 1 1

19 Nguyễn Hoàng La 209.9 13,297.0 209.9 1.6%

20 Trương Vĩnh Sơn - Phạm Thị Vốn

84.4 545.0 84.4 15.5%

21 Phan Hồng Phước (Đại diện) bà Phan Thị Mạnh Xuân 698.5 4,126.0

698.5 16.9%

22 Ông Phan Hồng Phước - - - - - - - #DIV/0! 2

23

Hồ Thị Đồng (Đại diện) thừa kế gồm: bà Nguyễn Thị Lệ Hoa,bà Nguyễn Thị Kim Pha, ông Châu Văn Thanh

441.9 1,341.0

441.9 33.0%

24 Ông Võ Thành Triêu 2,013.3 5,283.0 2,013.3 38.1%

25 Bà Võ Thị Út Hiền 2,151.4 6,238.5 2,151.4 34.5%

26 Ông Võ Văn Sơn và bà Ngô Thị Tuyết Mai 1,777.6 4,034.0

1,777.6 44.1%

27

Ông Phan Minh Triết và bà Trịnh Thị Mỹ Hương (Đồng sử dụng) với ông Bùi Hữu Phúc và bà Nguyễn Thị Như Loan

1,055.6 2,893.4

1,055.6 36.5%

28 Phan Văn Dĩ (Đại diện) 278.2 2,636.7 278.2 10.6%

29 Ông Mai Thanh Phong 2,942.0 19416.2 2,942.0 15.2%

30 Ông Nguyễn Văn A và bà Trần Thị Sang - 0 0 598.7 0 - 0.0%

31 Ông Lâm Phước Hùng 112

600.0 712 112.0 15.7%

Không có

nhà

1

32 Ông Nguyễn Văn Khương 1,852.4 5,134.4 1,852.4 36.1%



Page 130

33 Ông Lê Lý Ngọc Sáng 2,930.5 11,000.0 2,930.5 26.6%

34 Ông Phạm Văn Hiền và ông Lê Đồng Tân (Đồng sử dụng) 23.1 5,007.0

23.1 0.5%

35 Ông Lê Đồng Tân và bà Trần Thị Bích Thảo 838.1 9,804.0

838.1 8.5%

36 Ông Nguyễn Văn Tư và bà Nguyễn Kim Hiền 630.3 2,500.0

630.3 25.2%

37 Ông Mạch Thanh Tùng và bà Lê Thị Giàu 168.4 1,180.0

168.4 14.3%

38 Bà Nguyễn Thị Gọi và ông Nguyễn Thanh Tân 733.5 5,533.5

733.5 13.3%

39 Bà Lê Thị Bích Huyền 1,633.0 5,896.0 1,633.0 27.7%

40 Ông Nguyễn Văn Khê 2,338.4 9,664.0 2,338.4 24.2%

41 Bà Ngô Thị Hận 999.9 2,822.0 999.9 35.4%

42 Ông Ngô Văn Trưng và bà Trần Thị Chín

197.6 2,179.0 197.6 9.1%

43 Ông Ngô Văn Đúng 1,297.2 8,281.7 1,297.2 15.7%

44 Đỗ Đức Tuấn (Đại diện) ông Đỗ Đức Khiêm đã chết 906.7

6,565.8 906.7 13.8%

45 Ông Hà Văn Go và bà Mai Thị Thảo 1,660.7

192.3 7,329.6 1,660.7 22.7%

46 Bà Hồ Thị Kim Huyền 1,463.8 209.1 5,615.0 1,672.9 29.8%

47 Ông Lê Hữu Phước (Đại diện)

47.7 5,854.4 47.7 0.8%

48 Bà Lương Kim Chon và ông Nguyễn Ngọc Phương

989.8 2,114.9 989.8 46.8%

49 Ông Thái Văn Hậu và bà Trần Kim Hòa

22.3 2,991.3 22.3 0.7%

50 Ông Lâm Tùng Cương - - - - - - - 0.0% Temp 42.5 1 1 1

51 Ông Nguyễn Văn Nam - - - - - - - 0.0% C4 18.14 1 2

52 Bà Mai Thị Liễu Nương - - - - - - - 0.0% C4 44.2 1 1 1

53 Bà Lê Thị Mỏng - - - - - - - 0.0% Temp 46.65 1 1 1

54 Ông Nguyễn Văn Thúc Em - - - - - - - 0.0% C4 23.9 1 1 1

55 Bà Nguyễn Thị Ngọc Bích - - - - - - - 0.0% Temp 34.5 1 1 1


Page 131

56 Bà Nguyễn Thị Thủy - - - - - - 0.0%

57 Ông Phạm Văn Lộc - - - - - - - 0.0%

58 Bà Bùi Thị Ngọc Tuyết - - - - - - - 0.0% C4 39.25 1 1 1

II PHƯỜNG MỸ THỚI

1 Ông Nguyễn Văn Bình và bà Đặng Huyền Diễm

0.2 5,345.0 0.2 0.0%

2 Ông Phạm Chí Hiền và bà Huỳnh Thị Tuyết Trinh 188.0 3,000.0

188.0 6.3%

3 Ông Huỳnh Hữu Hiền 6.0 1,300.0 6.0 0.5%

4 Ông Nguyễn Văn Chí và bà Trần Kim Dung 1,225.9 1,881.0

1,225.9 65.2%

5 Ông Nguyễn Phúc Nguyên và bà Trình Thị Kim Sang 1,731.4 8,707.0

1,731.4 19.9%

6 Ông Nguyễn Quốc Khánh 591.6 4,778.0 591.6 12.4%

7 Ông Nguyễn Quốc Thống 827.9 3,266.0 827.9 25.3%

8 Bà Lê Thị Mến 926.6 2,998.0 926.6 30.9%

9 Bà Nguyễn Minh Thơ 919.1 2,959.0 919.1 31.1%

10 Bà Nguyễn Thị Thôi và ông Trần Văn Phải 790.4 4,455.0

790.4 17.7%

11 Ông Phạm Vinh Quang 2,555.1 8,820.0 2,555.1 29.0%

12 Ông Lê Văn Hóa 1,747.4 4,553.0 1,747.4 38.4%

13 Ông Phan Hoàng Trọng 3,399.7 14,172.8 3,399.7 24.0%

14 Ông Nguyễn Văn Đền 118.4 16,211.0 118.4 0.7%

15 Ông Nguyễn Minh Kiệt 1,386.6 6,781.0 1,386.6 20.4%

16 Ông Lê Phát Tấn (Đại diện) bà Nguyễn Thị Thiêu 738.0 7,730.0

738.0 9.5%

17 Ông Lê Văn Linh 756.9 6,026.0 756.9 12.6%

18 Ông Nguyễn Minh Lương và bà Nguyễn Thị Tiết Hạnh 1,897.7 24,681.0

1,897.7 7.7%



Page 132

19 Bà Nguyễn Thị Hai và ông Mai Công Dỡn 747.9 13,351.0

747.9 5.6%

20 Ông Trịnh Văn Nhà 1,064.9 10,253.0 1,064.9 10.4%

21 Công ty CP Nam Việt (đại diện) 5,229.1 37.6 96,054.9 5,266.7 5.5%

22 Ông Lê Văn Khuynh 599.3 4,301.5 599.3 13.9%

23 Bà Trương Khánh Ngọc 3,095.0 9,012.0 3,095.0 34.3%

24 Ông Huỳnh Hiệp Tùng 4,580.0 5,514.5 4,580.0 83.1%

25 Bà Lư Thị Sáng và ông Lê Hữu Hạnh

783.0 8,717.0 783.0 9.0%

26 Ông Lê Hoàng Đức 200.0 1,221.0 200.0 16.4%

27 Ông Nguyễn Trọng Khởi và bà Phan Thị Dúng

31.7 3,301.0 31.7 1.0%

28 Bà Nguyễn Thị Trúc Phương 193.9 1,000.0 193.9 19.4%

29 Ông Nguyễn Thành Tâm 206.3 1,000.0 206.3 20.6%

30 Ông Phạm Văn Đông 221.7 1,000.0 221.7 22.2%

31 Ông Ngô Hồng Quang 891.9 4,265.0 891.9 20.9%

32 Bà Nguyễn Ngọc Mai và bà Nguyễn Thị Ngọc Hà (Đồng sử dụng)

83.4

1,443.0 83.4 5.8%

33 Ông Nguyễn Thanh Tòng và bà Lâm Thị Ngọc Trung 713.7 2,441.0

713.7 29.2%

34 Ông Ngô Minh Thái và bà Lê Thị Ngọc Hân 1,452.6 8,551.0

1,452.6 17.0%

35 Ông Bùi Anh Thương 4,326.8 527.3 13,335.3 4,854.1 36.4%

36 Ông Cù Quang Hồng và bà Nguyễn Thị Bé 1,267.5 1,537.0

1,267.5 82.5% C4 109.3 1 1

37 Bà Cù Thị Gấm 2,752.4 6,717.0 2,752.4 41.0%

38 Ông Lê Đồng Tân và bà Trần Thị Bích Thảo 2,020.1 4,397.0

2,020.1 45.9%

39 Bà Nguyễn Trần Xuân Khánh 1,719.6 2,892.0 1,719.6 59.5%


Page 133

40 Bà Nguyễn Trần Phương Khánh 841.3 2,971.7 841.3 28.3%

41 Bà Trần Kim Liên 1,085.2 2,996.8 1,085.2 36.2%

42 Ông Trần Quang Chiểu và bà Lại Thị Tuyết Mai 2,335.0 7,402.0

2,335.0 31.5%

43 Bà Nguyễn Thị Xuân Trang 3,377.2 5,218.0 3,377.2 64.7%

44 Ông Nguyễn Thành Kiểu 1,410.6 7,945.0 1,410.6 17.8%

45 Bà Lê Thị Hồng Thẳm 2,116.7 5,548.0 2,116.7 38.2%

46 Ông Nguyễn Thị Minh Tú 1,096.0 3,000.0 1,096.0 36.5%

47 Bà Tô Yến Lũy và ông Nguyễn Công Khanh 461.8

1,501.0 461.8 30.8%

48 Ông Nguyễn Ngọc Điền và bà Nguyễn Thị Nga 498.7

1,500.0 498.7 33.2%

49 Đặng Ngọc Thành 741.7 1,401.0 741.7 52.9%

50 Ông Lê Đồng Tiến và bà Nguyễn Thị Thanh Hà 162.0

10,492.0 162.0 1.5%

51 Ông Nguyễn Văn Hành 645.9 16,498.0 645.9 3.9%

52

Ông Lê Đồng Tiến và bà Nguyễn Thị Thanh Hà đồng sử dụng với ông Phạm Văn Hiền và bà Lê Thị Bích Huyền

961.3

10,492.0 961.3 9.2%

53 Ông Hồ Văn Ấn và bà Danh Thị Dung Em

828.2 - - 0.0% C4 117.6 2

54 Ông Nguyễn Minh Kim và bà Phạm Kim Oanh 4,465.5 4,567.0 4,465.5 97.8%

55 Ông Phạm Văn Hiền và bà Lê Thị Bích Huyền 178.6

1,000.0 178.6 17.9%

56 Ông Trương Lê Quốc Tuấn 195.0 1,000.0 195.0 19.5%

57 Ông Đặng Hữu Huy và Vương Thị Thu Hà 2,192.0 2,192.0 2,192.0 100.0%

58 Ông Trần Minh Hoàng và bà Lê Thị Hà Đông 1,264.8

5,438.0 1,264.8 23.3%

59 Bà Lâm Thị Hai 722.5 3,699.0 722.5 19.5%



Page 134

60 Ông Nguyễn Văn Thưởng và bà Nguyễn Thị Loan

341.3 341.3 341.3 100.0%

61 Bà Phan Thị Hoa và ông Hồ Văn Liến

575.9 1,285.9 575.9 44.8%

62 Bà Hồ Thị Mến

150.9 - 0.0% C4 32.5

1 1

63 Bà Lê Thị Tải 994.6 9,693.0 994.6 10.3%

64 Ông Nguyễn Thanh Liêm và bà Võ Thị Kim Chi 773.9

14,791.0 773.9 5.2%

65 Ông Huỳnh Văn Tài 4,042.1 9,489.0 4,042.1 42.6%

66 Ông Hồ Tấn Phú

85.8 85.8 85.8 100.0%

67 Ông Nguyễn Văn Lức 835.1 5,906.0 835.1 14.1%

68 Bà Trần Thị Mỹ Hạnh (Đại diện) ông Phạm Hoàng Minh 925.0

8,224.0 925.0 11.2%

69 Phạm Tài Đức (Đại diện) 699.8 9,438.0 699.8 7.4%

70 Nguyễn Thị Hồng 553.0 8,957.0 553.0 6.2%

71 Ông Nguyễn Văn Tư và bà Nguyễn Kim Hiền

167.1 5,586.0 167.1 3.0%

72 Ông Lê Văn Khiết - - - - - - 0.0% Temp 62.4 1 1 1

III PHƯỜNG MỸ QUÝ

1 Lê Thị Trúc Phương

10.0 0 0.0% C4 71.8 2

2 Lê Thị Hồng Thắm 78.3 0 0.0% C4 47.3 1 1

3 Trần Bửu Châu 1,461.7 1469.1 1461.7 99.5% C4 60.7 1 1

4 Trần Thái Châu 327.7 959.7 327.7 34.1% C4 32.4 1 1

5 Nguyễn Minh Kim 3134.3 8306 3134.3 37.7%

6 Dương Thị Minh Hiếu 1229.8 2800 1229.8 43.9%

7 Dương Văn Lụa 1229.2 3353 1229.2 36.7%

8 Nguyễn Dương Cường Vũ 804.4 8201 804.4 9.8%

9 Trần Nguyên 811.4 5001 811.4 16.2%

10 Nguyễn Văn Tường 136.5 6758 136.5 2.0%

11 Lê Thị Đông Xuân 15.4 9,637.0 15.4 0.2%


Page 135

12 Đòan Văn Cường đại diện (Trần Thị Phấn đã mất) 869.5 2593

869.5 33.5%

13 Nguyễn Văn Đực 465.8 1007 465.8 46.3%

14 Dương Thị Dúng 918.2 4007 918.2 22.9%

15 Nguyễn Thị Hoa 216.9 3,589.6 216.9 6.0%

16 Trần Hữu Tùng 788.1 6127 788.1 12.9%

17 Nguyễn Thị Thanh Xuân 3469.5 10269 3469.5 33.8%

18 Phạm Phú Huân 1510.6 8252 1510.6 18.3%

19 Phạm Trung Lập 378.3 1548 378.3 24.4%

20 Phạm Văn Lèo (Phạm Văn Nghé (chết) 768.8 1639

768.8 46.9%

21 Phạm Văn Thử 1661.2 8895 1661.2 18.7%

22 Phạm Văn Go 1,306.6 4683.2 1306.6 27.9%

23 Phạm Văn Khoái A 1,526.4 5236 1526.4 29.2%

24 Trần Văn Đực 1,380.4 5376 1380.4 25.7%

25 Nguyễn Thanh Sử 903.3 3,755.00 903.3 24.1%

26 Trần Ngọc Tiếp 1494 8729 1494 17.1%

27 Đỗ Thị Ngọc Mai (đồng sử dụng Quách Văn Sĩ và Hồ Văn Hò) 872.8 3168

872.8 27.6%

28 Lê Thị Tám 487.3 2,661.0 487.3 18.3%

29 Lê Thị Cẩm Duyên 561.5 3000 561.5 18.7%

30 Đinh Võ Gia Hào 966.6 5096 966.6 19.0%

31 Nguyễn Quốc Thống 1,215.8 4427.6 1215.8 27.5%

32 Nguyễn Thị Kim Thoa Em 335.0 2,705.0 335 12.4%

IV PHƯỜNG MỸ PHƯỚC

1 Nguyễn Hoàng Tứ 1,307.5 3,444.4 1,307.5 37.96%

2 Hà Văn Tùng 264.5 264.5 264.5 100.00% C4 38.43 1 1



Page 136

3 Dương Văn Hoàng đại diện (Dương Văn Hoàng đã chết) 153.8 260.7 806.1

414.5 51.42%

4 Dương Thanh Vũ 441.1 1,000.0 441.1 44.11%

5 Tô Thị Hằng 433.5 1,000.0 433.5 43.35%

6 Tô Yến Lũy 421.3 1,000.0 421.3 42.13%

7 Nguyễn Văn Thêm 870.5 2,104.9 870.5 41.36%

8 Mã Văn Út 243.9 1,079.0 243.9 22.60%

9 Võ Thị Diêu 238.8 1,056.0 238.8 22.61%

10 Trần Thanh Hải 236.3 1,044.0 236.3 22.63%

11 Triệu Quang Minh 234.8 1,032.0 234.8 22.75%

12 Trần Hoàng 113.7 507.0 113.7 22.43%

13 Đỗ Hồng Nhung 232.6 1,015.0 232.6 22.92%

14 Huỳnh Thị Em 228.5 994.0 228.5 22.99%

15 Huỳnh Thị Bông 226.9 971.0 226.9 23.37%

16 Lê Thị Bạn (đại diện) 321.0 1,186.4 321.0 27.06%

17 Võ Văn Bắp 776.8 2,500.0 776.8 31.07%

18 Võ Thị Xanh 278.3 1,326.4 2,982.6 1,604.7 53.80%

19 Lê Ngọc Mai 451.9 971.0 451.9 46.54%

20 Nguyễn Thị Xích 735.3 4,771.2 735.3 15.41%

21 Thái Thị Chạy 1,024.2 6,170.0 1,024.2 16.60%

22 Phạm Thị Kim Anh 1,106.6 5,700.0 1,106.6 19.41%

23 Trần Thị Ngọc Thơ 604.1 1,658.6 1,580.0 2,262.7 143.21%

24 Nguyễn Văn Nỷ 1,297.0 2,649.0 1,297.0 48.96%

25 Nguyễn Mỹ 1,588.5 3,972.9 1,588.5 39.98%

26 Trần Thanh Hùng 598.7 1,087.1 598.7 55.07%

27 Trần Thái Hưng 403.1 1,090.8 403.1 36.95%

28 Trần Công Điền 392.1 1,085.7 392.1 36.11%

29 Trương Mạnh Hùng 891.7 61.2 2,534.0 891.7 35.19%

30 Trịnh Thanh Long (được thừa kế của Nguyễn Thị Phi) 1,320.7 17,864.1

1,320.7 7.39%

31 Huỳnh Thanh Phong 1,277.3 3,884.5 1,277.3 32.88%

32 Đỗ Thị Tuyết 92.8 525.8 92.8 17.65%

33 Nguyễn Thị Thái Sơn 97.6 519.6 97.6 18.78%

34 Hồ Thị Sua 94.9 519.6 94.9 18.26%


Page 137

35 Phạm Phú Huân đồng sử dụng Dương Văn Hoàng 754.0 6,816.8 754.0 11.06%

36 Nguyễn Văn Trọn 740.3 2,423.9 740.3 30.54%

37 Nguyễn Thành Cưng 706.4 6,667.7 706.4 10.59%

38 Hồ Hữu Phát 696.4 2,178.0 696.4 31.97%

39 Nguyễn Văn Thung 883.7 8,994.9 883.7 9.82%

40 Nguyễn Ngọc Tâm đại diện Nguyễn Văn Kháng 399.7

4,000.0 399.7 9.99%

41 Nguyễn Thị Mến 464.9 5,725.0 464.9 8.12%

42 Nguyễn Văn Trọng đại diện Nguyễn Hồng Phước đã chết 1,819.2 16,636.1 1,819.2 10.94%

43 Châu Thị Minh Hiếu

238.4

91.8

238.4 238.4 100.00%

Không có

nhà 1 44 Lê Thị Bích Hạnh 301.4 500.0 301.4 60.28% C4 85.86 1 1

45 Lê Thị Kiều Dung

29.0

500.0 29.0 5.80%

46 Dương Văn Bé Út - - - - - - 0.00% C4 65.23 1 1 1

47 Dương Văn Hoàng - - - - - - 0.00% C4 65.86 1 1 1 48 Nguyễn Văn Phấn - - - - - - 0.00% C4 76.93 1 1 1 49 Nguyễn Tấn Phúc - - - - - - 0.00% C4 51.76 1 1 1

50 Nguyễn Đức - 0.00%

51 Nguyễn Văn Tuấn 251.0 200.0 4,030.5 251.0 6.23% C4 45.23 1 1 52 Nguyễn Tấn Bình - - - - - - 0.00% C4 51.37 1 1 1 53 Nguyễn Văn Trí - - - - - - 0.00% C4 60.73 1 1 1 54 Nguyễn Văn Bé Ba 233.1 200.0 3,076.3 233.1 7.58% C4 79.2 1 1 55 Nguyễn Quốc Việt - - - - - - 0.00% Temp 33.88 1 1 1

56 Nguyễn Thị Hường

235.0 200.0

235.0 235.0 100.00%

Không có

nhà 1

57 Nguyễn Văn Hưng

235.8 200.0

235.8 235.8 100.00%

Không có

nhà 1 58 Đỗ Văn Hồ 1,926.2 4,030.5 1,926.2 47.79%

59 Trần Thị Thu Trang 173.4 1,274.6 173.4 13.60%



Page 138

60 Đỗ Văn Đẹp 544.3 3,076.3 544.3 17.69%

V PHƯỜNG MỸ HÒA

1 Nguyễn Thị Kim Loan - 0.00%

2 Đặng Kim Hà 2.2

- 0.00%

3 Đỗ Thanh Vân

- 0.00% C4 78.25 1 1 1

4 Lê Thị Cẩm Dúng

- 0.00%

5 Nguyễn Thành Đức và Lê Thị E 341.2 833.3 341.2 40.95%

C4 87.11 1 1

6 Nguyễn Thị Ngọc Hạnh 187.3 523.7 187.3 35.76%

C4 61.81 1 1

7 Nguyễn Thị Ngọc Hiếu

173.3 519.0 173.3 33.39%

8 Nguyễn Thị Ngọc Hằng 164.9

526.8 164.9 31.30%

9 Lê Xuân Hoàn - Đỗ Thị Đẹp 52.5 114.4 242.6 52.5 21.64%

C4 34.32 1 1

10 Lê Thị Hoàng Oanh 63.9

- 0.00% C4 20.98 1 1

11 Lê Thị Khánh Oanh 62.4

- 0.00% C4 35.93 1 1

12 Trần Thị Màu 24.8

- 0.00% Temp 21 1 1

13 Phạm Hà Cưng

- 0.00%

14 Phạm Văn Ni và Nguyễn Thị Kim Phụng

24.3 86.0

24.3 24.3 100.00%

15 Nguyễn Văn Cập

- 0.00%

16 Đặng Kim Tuyết 39.2

- 0.00% C4 47.12 1 1

17 Nguyễn Trần Thị Thu Trang 98.2

190.3 98.2 51.60%

18 Lê Âu Như Trang và Nguyễn Văn Năm

1,137.8

1,137.8 1,137.8 100.00%


Page 139

19 Phạm Triều Vương

- 0.00% C4 19.98 1 2

20 Nguyễn Văn Khoái

- 0.00% C4 23.77 1 2

21 Trần Thị Tuyết Vân

- 0.00% C4 32.1 1 2

22 Nguyễn Thị Lắm

- 0.00% C4 12.13 1 2

23 Lê Thị Kiều Oanh 65.5

- 0.00% C4 24.96 1 1

24 Phan Thị Tráng 48.5 100.0 429.3 48.5 11.30%

C4 2.33 2

25 Nguyễn Ngọc Dung

- 0.00% C4 28.81 1 1 1

26 Trương Anh Thư

- 0.00%

27 Trần Thị Nhược Thủy 890.0 1,007.0 890.0 88.38%

28 Phạm Thị Như Ngọc 52.5

- 0.00%

Không BAH nhà

1

29 Cao Thị Hoa (đại diện) 204.8 30.8 696.5 204.8 29.40%

30 Lê Tấn Thạnh và Trần Thị Mỹ Trang

117.0 117.0 117.0 100.00% C4

68.63 1 1

31 Nguyễn Văn Thái Lai 77.7 - 0.00% C4 68.91

1 1

32 Phạm Huy Sang 343.5

1,908.8 343.5 18.00%

33 Phạm Văn Khuýnh và Trần Thị Phia 328.1 1,834.2

328.1 17.89%

34 Lê Thị Loan và Huỳnh Văn Hồng

119.8 119.8 119.8 100.00% C4 83.73 1 1

35 Trương Văn Dũng và Lê Mỹ Tuyết

72.9

- 0.00%

Không BAH nhà

1



Page 140

36 Đoàn Chí Thiện - 0.00% C4 57.09 1 1 1

37 Lê Thành Tâm

- 0.00% C4 81.98 1 1 1

38 Hộ Lê Văn Nỉ 897.2 94.7 28.9 3,117.2 991.9 31.82%

C4 31.91 2

39 Đặng Hùng Cường và Nguyễn Thị Thẩm

125.6 140.9 125.6 89.14%

40 Đặng Văn Bẹ Em (đại diện) 998.7

998.7 998.7 100.00%

41 Huỳnh Bảo Quốc 630.4 2,196.6 630.4 28.70%

42 Trần Công Điền 275.3 877.0 275.3 31.39%

43 Phạm Ngọc Phương

76.3 - 0.00% C4 31.62

1 1

44 Đặng Thị Sữa: sinh năm 1972

118.3 118.3 118.3 100.00% C4 13.68

1 1

45 Đặng Thị Sữa sinh năm 1968

62.5 - 0.00% C4 21.78

1 1

46 Dưỡng Thanh Hải - 0.00% C4 21.35

1 1 1

47 Dương Chí Dũng

99.0 - 0.00% C4 48.96

2

48 Hồ Văn Đông

- 0.00% C4 11.81 1 1 1

49 Hồ Văn Giang

- 0.00% C4 11.2 1 1 1


Page 141

50 Truơng Văn Bằng - 0.00% C4 18.37

1 1 1

51 Nguyễn Văn Ngời (chết) Nguyễn Thị Nhung

- 0.00% C4 26.77 1 1 1

52 Nguyễn Thị Lợi Năm (đại diện) 363.0

552.0 363.0 65.76%

53 Nguyễn Thanh Phương - 0.00% C4 24.3

1 1 1

54 Đỗ Ngọc Trường - 0.00% C4 23.58

1 1 1

55 Nguyễn Văn Thơm - 0.00% Temp 20.96

1 1 1

56 Võ Thị Tuyết Trinh 125.6 2,172.0 125.6 5.78%

57 Lê Ngọc Khánh 741.4

3,490.6 741.4 21.24%

58 Lương Công Minh 273.1

877.0 273.1 31.14%

59 Nguyễn Hùng Tráng - 0.00%

60 Trần Ngọc Búa 3,346.5

8,757.0 3,346.5 38.22%

61 Nguyễn Văn Mẫn - 0.00%

62 Nguyễn Ngọc Minh - 0.00%

63 Nguyễn Văn Lũy 152.2 114.5

970.0 266.7 27.49%

64 Nguyễn Văn Dũng - 0.00%

65 Lê Bá Dự 956.7

1,637.0 956.7 58.44%



Page 142

66 Nguyễn Thanh Long

61.1 - 0.00%

Không BAH nhà

1

67 Hoàng Anh Hùng 44.5 - 0.00% C4 90.08

1 1

68 Hoàng Thị Hải Châu 125.5 - 0.00% C4 89.61

1 1

69 Đặng Văn Ê 93.6 - 0.00% C4 79.05

2

70 Võ Thị Mỹ Dung 75.1 - 0.00% C4 54

1 1

71 Võ Thị Lan Chi - 0.00% C4 11

1 1 1

72 Nguyễn Văn Phước 88.1 - 0.00% C4 52.97

1 1

73 Trần Thanh Mai - 0.00% C4 14.47

1 1 1

74 Trần Thị Hải 40.3 - 0.00% C4 40.2

1 1

75 Phạm Thị Ánh Hồng 81.9 - 0.00% C4 41.66

1 1

76 Nguyễn Văn Ngoan (Đại diện) 1.9 - 0.00% C4 1.64

2

77 Huỳnh Thị Đỏ 472.6

768.8 472.6 61.47%

78 Phan Thành Nhiệm 13.2 31.3

94.1 13.2 14.03%

79 Phạm Thị Ánh Lùng

24.4 - 0.00%

Không BAH nhà

1

80 Trần Thị Thanh Thúy - 0.00%

81 Nguyễn Lam Sơn (Đại diện) 3,075.4

5,628.6 3,075.4 54.64%

82 Nguyễn Phú Quí 84.6

1,130.0 84.6 7.49%

83 Nguyễn Văn Giới

784.0

2,266.1 784.0 34.60%


Page 143

84 Nguyễn Thành Thiện

- 0.00%

85 Lê Thành Dững

29.8

- 0.00%

86 Lê Văn Lĩnh (Đại diện) 1,458.2 162.4

3,264.4 1,620.6 49.64%

87 Đỗ Thị Sương

4,163.0 - 0.00% C4 80.6

1 1 1

88 Lê Hoàng Dũ 1,020.2

4,163.0 1,020.2 24.51%

89 Phan Thị Mừng (Đại diện) 50.0 - 0.00% C4 46.5

1 1

90 Nguyễn Thị Ngọc Giàu

- 0.00% C4 43.53 1 1 1

91 Ngô Bình Thường

91.8 - 0.00% C4 59.36

1 1

92 Diệp Thị Minh Phượng

74.6 - 0.00% C4 42.54

1 1

93 Lê Thành Trí (Đại diện) 530.1 104.6 530.1 530.1 100.00% C4 78.61

1 1

94 Phan Thị Hoàng Yến

- 0.00% Temp 20.32 1 1 1

95 Đỗ Thị Út Em

- 0.00% Temp 47.2 1 1 1

96 Bùi Thị Huỳnh Lê

60.0 - 0.00%

Không BAH nhà

1



Page 144

97 Lê Hùng Phong

63.4 - 0.00%

Không BAH nhà

1

98 Phạm Văn Có - 0.00% C4 33.95 1 1 1

99 Cao Văn Minh - 0.00% Temp 8.52

1 1 1

100 Đặng Thị Hà (Đại diện) 138.7 1.9 138.7 138.7 100.00%

101 Trần Ngọc Điệp 420.6

1,000.0 420.6 42.06%

102 Huỳnh Thanh Liêm 887.5

2,870.2 887.5 30.92%

103 Cao Thi Chí Lùng - 0.00% Temp 27.9

1 1 1

104 Đặng Duy Khánh 19.4 - 0.00% C4 7.52

2

105 Đỗ Văn Tòng - 0.00% C4 80.87

1 1 1

106 Nguyễn Văn Hai 57.8 - 0.00% C4 57.99

1 2

107 Dương Thanh Liêm 153.5 - 0.00% C4 46.16

1 1

108 Phan Thị Diễm Phương

112.9 - 0.00%

Không BAH nhà

1

109 Đặng Văn Đọt 138.0 - 0.00% C4 38.66

1 1

110 Đỗ Văn Đẹp 223.8 - 0.00% C4 100.08

1 1

111 Nguyễn Thị Lợi Năm - 0.00%

112 Đặng Thị Hiệp (Đại diện) 1.8 - 0.00% C4 16.89

2

113 Đặng Văn Cảnh 60.1 - 0.00%

114 Trịnh Hữu Lý 31.5 3,204.0 31.5 0.98%

115 Lê Văn Ất 1,090.0 3,403.0 1,090.0 32.03%

116 Đặng Văn Bộ - 0.00% C4 64.28 1 1 1


Page 145

117 Trần Quốc Tuấn 571.6 5,400.0 571.6 10.59%

118 Huỳnh Văn Kiêu 678.0 3,077.3 678.0 22.03%

119 Huỳnh Thị Ánh 1,748.9 10,126.0 1,748.9 17.27%

120 Nguyễn Hữu Tài 2,124.3 10,846.0 2,124.3 19.59%

121 Nguyễn Thế Trạch 73.8 238.7 73.8 30.92%

122 Ngô Thị Phương Anh 174.1 262.0 174.1 66.45% C4 72.1

1 1

123 Phạm Thị Cẩm Thi 331.7 1,820.9 331.7 18.22%

124 Đặng Hoàng Thanh 61.5 - 0.00% C4 41.75

1 1

125 Bùi Thị Bảo My 276.1 877.0 276.1 31.48%

126 Nguyễn Văn Minh 1,908.0 7,129.0 1,908.0 26.76%

127 Hoàng Anh Giảng 158.8 250.2 158.8 63.47%

128 Nguyễn Ngọc Thúy Vi và Huỳnh Thu Vân 1,085.0

7,487.1 1,085.0 14.49%

129 Huỳnh Văn Thành 604.1 2,808.0 604.1 21.51%

130 Huỳnh Thị Hường 1,105.4 9,564.0 1,105.4 11.56%

131 Lê Minh Nhựt - 0.00% C4 58.74 1 1 1

132 Đặng Văn Huyền - 0.00% C4 37.91 1 1 1

133 Nguyễn Thành Thân 67.5

11,257.0 67.5 0.60%

134 Đặng Văn Mẫm 376.3 112.2

405.9 376.3 92.71% C4 83.42

2

135 Đỗ Văn Hồ (Đại diện) 903.1 186.2 921.0 903.1 98.06% C4 81.81

1 2

136 Trịnh Thị Huệ (Đại diện) 1,536.1

1,768.2 1,536.1 86.87% C4 44.38

2

137 Đặng Thị Tám 872.8 71.4

2,710.0 872.8 32.21% C4 35.02

1 1

138 Huỳnh Thị Bạch - 0.00% C4 32.64

1 1 1

139 Hàng Thị Phụng 14.6 76.6 14.6 14.6 100.00% C4 34.24

1 1



Page 146

140 Nguyễn Thị Thủy - 0.00% Temp 44.97

1 1 1

141 Trần Quang Trường - 0.00% C4 72 1 1 1

142 Nguyễn Thị Tuyết Trinh - 0.00% Temp 25.22 1 1 1

143 Nguyễn Cẩm Thúy - 0.00% Temp 7

1 2

144 Nguyễn Thị Chúc Ly - 0.00% Temp 7

1 2

145 Đặng Văn Bẹ Em 182.5

328.0 182.5 55.64%

146 Trần Văn Tấn - 0.00%

147 Nguyễn Văn Danh - 0.00%

148 Chương Thành Thanh 34.5 - 0.00%

149 Trần Văn Hừng - 0.00%

VI XÃ MỸ KHÁNH

1 Bùi Thiện Quang, Lê Ngọc Ánh 1,559.4 7,852.0 1,559.4 19.86%

2 Trần Minh Tuấn (đại diện) 348.4 261.8 610.2 348.4 60.64%

1

3 Nguyễn Văn Thanh, Nguyễn Thị Còn 1,885.0 14,618.0

1,885.0 12.90%

4 Võ Văn Ri 2,160.0 9,969.0 2,160.0 21.67%

5 Bùi Văn Hùng, Trần Thị Xê 909.1 4,797.0 909.1 18.95%

6 Võ Trọng Khanh, Phan Thị Ái 1,083.1 7,141.0 1,083.1 15.17%

7 Võ Văn Hiền, Võ Thị Ngọc Cần 1,317.3 11,552.0 1,317.3 11.40%

8 Lê Thị Tới 476.1 2,846.0 476.1 16.73%

9 Nguyễn Văn Lượng 167.4 3,241.0 167.4 5.17%

10 Trần Minh Tuấn 302.8 208.7 302.8 302.8 100.00% C4 89.58 1 1

11 Trần Phú Lừng 777.5 11,000.0 777.5 7.07%

12 Trương Thị Ánh Tuyết 718.4 2,909.0 718.4 24.70%

13 Nguyễn Văn Khen (đại diện) 1,540.9 4,318.0 1,540.9 35.69%

14 Nguyễn Thị Ngọc Lan 255.6 2,103.0 255.6 12.15%

15 Phạm Thị Thu Tư 263.5 2,594.0 263.5 10.16%

16 Diệp Văn Dũng, Nguyễn Thị Kim Oanh

121.7

- 0.00%

Không có

1


Page 147

nhà

17 Trần Lê Phương, Nguyễn Thị Ngọc Chúc

28.3 600 28.3 28.3 100.00%

C4 32.20 1 1

18 Đỗ Vạn Phúc 1,380.2 3,884.0 1,380.2 35.54%

19 Nguyễn Hòa Bình (đại diện) 464.4 702.0 464.4 66.15%

20 Phạm Văn Dậm 1,627.8 7,338.0 1,627.8 22.18%

21 Bùi Văn Khoái 455.5 5,255.0 455.5 8.67%

22 Huỳnh Thị Nếp 513.8 600 2,397.0 513.8 21.44% C4 63.5 2

23 Đào Văn Ngõng 750.8 3,061.0 750.8 24.53%

24 Nguyễn Văn Tòng 502.6 2,178.0 502.6 23.08%

25 Ngô Duy Khánh, Nguyễn Thị Kim Hương 1,714.0 7,679.0

1,714.0 22.32%

26 Nguyễn Văn Thắng, Huỳnh Thị Hồng Yến

307.5 1,773.7 307.5 17.34%

27 Võ Ngọc Cẩn 300.8 12,294.0 300.8 2.45%

28 Nguyễn Văn Bén 461.2 3,318.0 461.2 13.90%

29 Nguyễn Thị Tiền 1,133.2 4,002.0 1,133.2 28.32%

30 Nguyễn Trường Giang 761.5 1,883.7 761.5 40.43%

31 Trần Thị Đẹp (đại diện) 1,424.2 10,400.7 1,424.2 13.69%

32 Nguyễn Ngọc Ẩn, Nguyễn Kim Quan

1,764.1 5,420.0 1,764.1 32.55%

33 Đào Hữu Lộc, Huỳnh Thị Thúy Nga 841.1 998.0

841.1 84.28%

34 Phan Văn Thao 816.0 3,712.0 816.0 21.98%

35 Phan Tấn Việt 2,183.8 5,251.0 2,183.8 41.59%

36 Nguyễn Văn Lâu 2,297.3 7,340.0 2,297.3 31.30%

37 Trương Thị Chiên 610.9 1,088.0 610.9 56.15%

38 Nguyễn Thị Nết 1.7 2,045.0 1.7 0.08%

39 Lê Văn Thành & Lê Văn Tâm 1,261.9 4,332.3 1,261.9 29.13%

40 Trần Ngọc Giàu 1,565.9 3,678.0 1,565.9 42.57%



Page 148

41 Trần Duy Khâm, Trang Thị Phấn 869.2 4,968.0 869.2 17.50%

42 Nguyễn Văn Tâm, Lê Thị Nhị 565.4 2,632.0 565.4 21.48%

43 Nguyễn Thị Huỳnh Liên, Hứa Ngọc Bên 741.6

2,854.0 741.6 25.98%

44 Đào Thị Nốt (đại diện) 741.1 2,854.0 741.1 25.97%

45 Phan Văn Thuộc 1,699.0 3,024.0 1,699.0 56.18%

46 Trương Thị Nói 2,070.6 18,448.0 2,070.6 11.22%

47 Nguyễn Phước Diêm 350.4 4,731.0 350.4 7.41%

48 Trần Thanh Nhàn 1,039.9 4,841.0 1,039.9 21.48%

49 Nguyễn Thị Chi 993.1 3,294.0 993.1 30.15%

50 Trần Văn Hoàng, Phạm Thị Mành 4.5

7,782.0 4.5 0.06%

51 Nguyễn Quốc Dũng 1,455.2 3,280.5 1,455.2 44.36%

52 Phạm Văn Nỹ (đại diện) 943.7 12,801.0 943.7 7.37%

53 Phạm Văn Nỹ, Nguyễn Thị Thanh

667.9 5,211.0 667.9 12.82%

54 Tống Văn Thang 1,370.2 3,172.0 1,370.2 43.20%

55 Trần Văn Sậm 512.5 2,272.0 512.5 22.56%

56 Nguyễn Văn Thẳng (thừa kế) 197.1 6,494.0 197.1 3.04%

57 Nguyễn Thị Sen (đại diện) 1,766.6 2,272.0 1,766.6 77.76%

58 Bùi Thành Giang, Trần Thị Thúy Diễm 2,210.6

3,450.0 2,210.6 64.08%

59 Nguyễn Thị Tú Loan 799.3 7,354.0 799.3 10.87%

60 Ngô Quang Hiền 282.6 4,173.3 282.6 6.77%

61 Trần Phú Lâm - 0 0 0 0 - 0.00% C4 76.5 1 1 1 62 Trần Thanh Điền - 0 0 0 0 - 0.00% C4 63.7 1 1 1 63 Lê Thị Thu Ba - 0 0 0 0 - 0.00% C4 77.7 1 1 1 64 Bùi Thị Thanh Thúy - 0 0 0 0 - 0.00% Temp 52.1 1 1 1 65 Trần Phú Thọ - 0 0 0 0 - 0.00% Temp 53.5 1 1 1 66 Cao Văn Em

- 0.00%

67 Huỳnh Kim Hoàng - 0.00%

68 Nguyễn Trần Quốc Nam - 0.00%

69 Cao Thị Mỹ Liên - 0.00%

70 Bùi Văn Dũng - 0.00%


Page 149

71 Cao Trí Kiệt - 0.00%

72 Võ Thị Hồng Tâm 17.0 1,000.0 17.0 1.70%

73 Trần Thị Màu - 0 0 0 - 0.00% Temp 47.9 1 1 1 74 Nguyễn Quang Nhựt

32.5 - 0.00%

75 Nguyễn Chánh Phức 957.3 2,142.0 957.3 44.69%

VII PHƯỜNG BÌNH KHÁNH

1 Nguyễn Thanh Vũ - - - - - - 0.00% Temp 22.4 1 1 1

2 Nguyễn Mười, Phan Thị Thùy Trang 2.6 45.1 1,000.0

47.7 4.77% C4 3.37 2

3 Hồ Nhựt Trường 237.4 3,000.0 237.4 7.91%

4 Huỳnh Minh Hoàng 1,686.3 2,504.0 1,686.3 67.34%

5 Nguyễn Văn Của 280.1 1,200.0 280.1 23.34%

6 Nguyễn Phụng Tâm 493.0 2,808.0 493.0 17.56%

7 Hồ Phúc Hậu 4,513.5 809.7 238.1 6,994.1 5,561.3 79.51%

8 Nguyễn Hà Triều 11.9 6,562.0 11.9 0.18%

9 Nguyễn Công Hầu - - - - - - 0.00% C4 38.10 1 1 1

10 Nguyễn Hữu Danh - - - - - - 0.00% C4 61.90 1 1 1

11 Nguyễn Văn Quít 529.7 2,106.0 529.7 25.15%

12 Nguyễn Hoàng Vũ 258.2 - 0.00% Temp 48.30 1 1

13 Nguyễn Hữu Nết 388.4 - 0.00% C4 34.10 1 1

14 Nguyễn Thị Lệ Phi 139.2 2,338.0 139.2 5.95% C4 41.98 1 1

15 Nguyễn Thị Lược 257.9 - 0.00% C4 67.30 1 1

16 Lý Thành Nhơn 1,117.1 2,106.0 1,117.1 53.04%

17 Lý Ngọc Mỹ 1,494.7 3,122.0 1,494.7 47.88%

18 Huỳnh Văn Nhành 41.4 144.0 1,270.0 41.4 3.26% C4 8.8 1 1

19 Huỳnh Hữu Chí 177.2 4,318.0 177.2 4.10%

20 Nguyễn Thị Thúy Mai 1,823.5 5,051.0 1,823.5 36.10%



Page 150

21 Lương Thị Thu Thúy 4,325.7 7,733.0 4,325.7 55.94%

22 Ngô Duy Khang 1,067.9 3,586.0 1,067.9 29.78%

23 Nguyễn Văn Búa 790.1 - 0.00% C4 43.40 1 1

24 Nguyễn Thị Điệp 10.8 - 0.00%

25 Lê Văn Minh - - - - - - 0.00% Temp 34.70 1 1 1

26 Lê Tấn Đạt 45.4 1,523.0 45.4 2.98%

VIII PHƯỜNG BÌNH ĐỨC

1 Nguyễn Tấn Tài 2,880.3 10,601.0 2,880.3 27.17%

2 Võ Anh Lang 361.9 17,998.0 361.9 2.01%

3 Tiêu Quốc Sang 1,692.5 8,628.0 1,692.5 19.62%

4 Nguyễn Ngọc Giàu 2,109.4 10,802.0 2,109.4 19.53%

5 Nguyễn Thị Cẩm Tú 2,492.4 9,954.0 2,492.4 25.04%

6 Nguyễn Thị Thanh Hương 131.2 1,898.3 131.2 6.91%

7 Thái Thị Miều 938.8 2,417.2 938.8 38.84%

8 Nguyễn Thành Công 2,604.0 10,065.0 2,604.0 25.87%

9 Lê Văn Thửng 1,848.5 8,506.0 1,848.5 21.73%

10 Đoàn Văn Thành 4,174.7 14,746.0 4,174.7 28.31%

11 Mai Văn Lập 1,006.7 4,000.0 1,006.7 25.17%

12 Lương Ngọc Hân 207.6 1,648.0 207.6 12.60%

13 Nguyễn Thị Thanh Thủy 323.1 2,334.0 323.1 13.84%

14 Lê Văn Kiếm 832.1 3,034.0 832.1 27.43%

15 Nguyễn Văn Thừa 444.0 4,069.0 444.0 10.91%

16 Nguyễn Kim Thừa 1,481.6 2,583.8 1,481.6 57.34%

17 Huỳnh Thị Lệ 669.8 4,444.0 669.8 15.07%

18 Đinh Thị Kim Dung 41.3 1,503.0 41.3 2.75%

19 Nguyễn Khoa Nam 498.9 2,329.0 498.9 21.42%

20 Trần Thiện Nguyên (đại diện) 807.6 8,760.0 807.6 9.22%

21 Nguyễn Thị Tuyết Mai 132.1 1,984.0 132.1 6.66%

22 Phù Hoàng Tuấn 183.7 3,202.0 183.7 5.74%

23 Nguyễn Thành Tâm 1,652.0 4,120.0 1,652.0 40.10%

24 Nguyễn Hữu Hồ, Nguyễn Hòa Hiệp (đồng sử dụng)

3,134.0 4,127.0

3,134.0 75.94%

25 Nguyễn Trường An 742.7 2,998.0 742.7 24.77%


Page 151

26 Phan Thái Trung 558.6 2,735.0 558.6 20.42%

27 Đoàn Tấn Việt 76.6 2,000.0 76.6 3.83%

28 Dương Hòa Lây 4,268.8 16,225.0 4,268.8 26.31%

29 Lê Phước Nhanh 236.2 1,000.0 236.2 23.62%

30 Lê Thành Nhơn 245.2 1,373.5 245.2 17.85%

31 Thái Trí Tính 1,603.9 13,034.1 1,603.9 12.31%

32 Phạm Phú Huân 427.5 10079 427.5 4.24%

33 Trần Văn Bính (đại diện) 1,501.6 4,628.0 1,501.6 32.45%

34 Khuất Thị Minh Phượng 587.8 3,219.0 587.8 18.26%

35 Trần Thị Thiện 925.0 1,285.2 925.0 71.97%

36 Nguyễn Thị Dúng 418.1 2,281.0 418.1 18.33%

37 Vương Tấn Dũng 4,520.9 8,231.0 4,520.9 54.93%

38 Nguyễn Thành Lộc 10.4 224.6 10.4 4.63%

39 Nguyễn Thị Ngọc Sương 754.1 2,975.0 754.1 25.35%

40 Vương Thị Ngọc Năm 79.1 3,000.0 79.1 2.64%

41 Nguyễn Thị Cẩm Loan 557.2 1,349.8 11,247.0 1,907.0 16.96%

42 Dương Võ Trí Đức 455.2 2,129.0 455.2 21.38%

43 Võ Thị Diêu 329.7 605.0 329.7 54.50%

44 Nguyễn Văn Bảy (đại diện) 195.5 2,608.0 195.5 7.50%

45 Hồ Ngọc Chuẩn 316.2 316.2 316.2 100.00%

46 Đoàn Văn Sính 0.00%

47 Châu Trước Mao 593.3 4,627.0 593.3 2.67%

48 Tạ Thị Thùy Trang 129.0 4,825.0 129.0 0.16%

49 Lê Thị Kim Loan 9.6 5,828.7 9.6 14.59%

50 Nguyễn Thành Đô 2,483.5 17,023.0 2,483.5 54.33%

51 Huỳnh Thị Bông 329.8 607.0 329.8 40.49%

52 Quan Thị Mến 855.6 2,113.0 855.6 17.87%

53 Nguyễn Thanh Sử 6,927.0 38,763.0 6,927.0 17.87%

54 Trần Công Điền 1,177.3 7,472.0 1,177.3 15.76%

55 Lê Văn Tiền 84.1 - 0.00% C4 61.1 1 1



Page 152

56 Phạm Tấn Lực 8.8 - 0.00%

57 Hồ Thị Thắng 70.7 - 0.00% C4 72.1 2

58 Hồ Văn Thanh 530.9 20.0 530.9 530.9 100.00% C4 102 2

59 Hồ Ngọc Hiếu

146.9 - 0.00%

Không BAH nhà 1

60 Hồ Văn Trung

172.4 - 0.00%

Không BAH nhà 1

61 Lưu Thị Rớt

165.6 - 0.00%

Không BAH nhà 1

62 Hà Thị Đẹp

41.3 - 0.00% C4 92.7 2

63 Trần Hoàng Vũ 33.3 - 0.00% C4 11.3 2

64 Nguyễn Văn Sinh 2.3 - 0.00%

65 Đỗ Khánh Hùng 20.0 - 0.00% C4 58.7 2

66 Hồ Thị Loan

131.5 - 0.00%

Không có

nhà 1

67 Hồ Thị Chanh

194.8 - 0.00%

Không có

nhà 1 68 Nguyễn Anh Long 1,120.8 1,781.2 1,120.8 62.92% C4 135.9 2

69 Nguyễn Văn Kháng 16.1 235.0 16.1 6.85%

70 Võ Trường Linh 148.3 241.0 148.3 61.54% C4 111.2 1 1 71 Nguyễn Thị Hồng Kiều 186.6 186.6 186.6 100.00%

72 Đinh Võ Minh Thắng 118.8 - 0.00% C4 69.9 1 2 73 Đinh Anh Tuấn 146.9 146.9 146.9 100.00%

74 Nguyễn Chí Thảo

118.3 - 0.00%

Không có

nhà 1 75 Nguyễn Hữu An 118.5 - 0.00% C4 63.4 1 1 76 Cao Thiện Nhựt 73.7 73.7 73.7 100.00%

77 Cao Thiện Nho 134.7 222.2 134.7 60.62%

78 Vưu Xuân Hiếu 207.7 - 0.00%

79 Ngô Thị Rê 773.0 586.7 773.0 773.0 100.00% C4 61.8 1 1 80 Nguyễn Văn Dân 70.6 200.0 70.6 70.6 100.00% C4 82.1 1 1 81 Huỳnh Văn Bạn 155.6 - 0.00% C4 101.3 1 1


Page 153

82 Nguyễn Thị Mịnh (đại diện) 9.9 200.0 90.9 9.9 10.89% C4 95.3 1 2 83 Nguyễn Văn Tài 141.4 - 0.00% C4 46.7 1 1 84 Hồ Nhựt Trường 140.2 - 0.00% C4 63.6 1 1 85 Nguyễn Văn Tam 259.7 600.0 259.7 259.7 100.00% C4 126.2 1 2 86 Nguyễn Thanh Bình - - - - - - 0.00% C4 48.4 1 1 1

87 Nguyễn Thị Ngọc Ánh

52.3

- 0.00%

Không BAH nhà 1



Page 154

Appendix 11: List of relocated households

No. Full name Address Number of plots Note

I My Thanh ward 12

1 Trần Ngọc Phương 42/2B K. Đông Thạnh A, P. Mỹ Thạnh, TPLX 1 Acquired all residential land and house

2 Nguyễn Văn Thiết 5/12B khóm Hòa Thạnh, P. Mỹ Thạnh, TPLX 1 Acquired the only land plot, not affected on house

3 Nguyễn Văn Hôi 1/3 khóm Thới An A, P.Mỹ Thạnh, TPLX 1 Acquired all residential land and house

4 Lâm Phước Hùng 28/13A K. Đông Thạnh A, P.Mỹ Thạnh, TPLX. 1 Acquired the only land plot, not affected on house

5 Lâm Tùng Cương 1/13 khóm Thới Thạnh, P.Mỹ Thạnh, TPLX. 1 Landless AHs, acquired fully house 6 Mai Thị Liễu Nương 1/13A khóm Thới An A, P.Mỹ Thạnh, TPLX. 1 Landless AHs, acquired fully house 7 Lê Thị Mỏng 1/6B khóm Thới An A, P.Mỹ Thạnh, TPLX. 1 Landless AHs, acquired fully house 8 Nguyễn Văn Thúc Em 1/3A khóm Thới An A, P.Mỹ Thạnh, TPLX. 1 Landless AHs, acquired fully house

9 Nguyễn Thị Ngọc Bích 1/3 khóm Thới An A, P.Mỹ Thạnh, TPLX. 1 Landless HH, acquired fully house (built on public land)

10 Bùi Thị Ngọc Tuyết 408/1 khóm Thới An A, P.Mỹ Thạnh, TPLX. 1 Landless AHs, acquired fully house 11 Nguyễn Văn Minh Lô 3, dãy 2 Hà Hoàng Hổ, P.Mỹ Xuyên, TPLX. 1 Acquired all residential land and house 12 Lê Văn Hà 1/6 khóm Thới An A, P.Mỹ Thạnh, TPLX 1 Landless AHs, acquired fully house II My Thoi ward 3

1 Cù Quang Hồng 310 đường Tây An, K. Tây An, phường Mỹ Thới, TPLX.

1 Built house on agricultural land, acquired fully house

2 Hồ Thị Mến 301/30 Trần Hưng Đạo, P.Mỹ Long, TPLX. 1 Acquired all residential land and house 3 Lê Văn Khiết 41/7A khóm Tây Thạnh, P. Mỹ Thới, TPLX. 1 Landless AHs, acquired fully house III My Quy ward 3 1 Lê Thị Hồng Thắm 157, khóm Tân Phú, phường Mỹ Quý, TPLX 1 Acquired all residential land and house

2 Trần Bửu Châu 1030/20D, khóm Tân Phú, phường Mỹ Quý, TPLX 1 Built house on agricultural land, acquired fully house

3 Trần Thái Châu 806/1 Đông Thịnh 4, phường Mỹ Phước, TPLX 1 Built house on agricultural land, acquired fully house

IV My Phuoc ward 14

1 Hà Văn Tùng 840D, tổ 5, khóm Đông An, phường Đông Xuyên,

TPLX 1 Built house on agricultural land, acquired fully

house

2 Châu Thị Minh Hiếu Số 17, Lương Văn Cù, phường Mỹ Long, TPLX 1 Acquired the only land plot, not affected on house


Page 155


3 Lê Thị Bích Hạnh 222, khóm Đông Thịnh 9, phường Mỹ Phước, TPLX 1 Built house on agricultural land, acquired fully house

4 Dương Văn Bé Út

187/G, tổ 143, khóm Đông Thịnh 8, phường Mỹ Phước, TPLX 1

Landless AHs, acquired fully house

5 Dương Văn Hoàng Mỹ Phước, thành phố Long Xuyên 1 Landless AHs, acquired fully house

6 Nguyễn Văn Phấn 187/8F, khóm Đông Thịnh 8, phường Mỹ Phước,

TPLX 1 Landless AHs, acquired fully house

7 Nguyễn Tấn Phúc 78/2, Bình Thới 3, phường Bình Khánh, TPLX 1 Landless AHs, acquired fully house

8 Nguyễn Văn Tuấn 1045/20C, Đông Thịnh 9, phường Mỹ Phước, TPLX 1 Acquired all residential land and house

9 Nguyễn Tấn Bình 236 khóm Đông Thịnh 9, phường Mỹ Phước, TPLX 1 Landless AHs, acquired fully house

10 Nguyễn Văn Trí phòng 1, 1044/20A, khóm Đông Thịnh 9, phường Mỹ

Phước, TPLX 1 Landless AHs, acquired fully house

11 Nguyễn Văn Bé Ba 1044/20A, khóm Đông Thịnh 9, phường Mỹ Phước,

TPLX 1 Acquired all residential land and house

12 Nguyễn Quốc Việt 1044/20A, khóm Đông Thịnh 9, phường Mỹ Phước,


13 Nguyễn Thị Hường 187/7G, khóm Đông Thịnh 8, phường Mỹ Phước,

TPLX 1 Acquired the only land plot, not affected on house

14 Nguyễn Văn Hưng 907/1A, tổ 40, Tây Khánh 6, phường Mỹ Hòa, TPLX 1 Acquired the only land plot, not affected on house

V My Hoa ward 71 1 Đỗ Thanh Vân 658/6A, Tây Khánh 5, Mỹ Hòa 1 Landless AHs, acquired fully house

2 Nguyễn Thành Đức và Lê Thị E 653/7B, Tây Khánh 5, Mỹ Hòa 1

Built house on agricultural land, acquired fully house

3 Nguyễn Thị Ngọc Hạnh 363/7C, Tây Khánh 5, Mỹ Hòa 1 Landless AHs, acquired fully house

4 Lê Xuân Hoàn - Đỗ Thị Đẹp 644/5A, Tây Khánh 5, Mỹ Hòa 1 Acquired all residential land and house

5 Lê Thị Hoàng Oanh 650/5A, Tây Khánh 5, Mỹ Hòa 1 Acquired all residential land and house 6 Lê Thị Khánh Oanh 644/5B, Tây Khánh 5, Mỹ Hòa 1 Acquired all residential land and house 7 Trần Thị Màu 640/4D, Tây Khánh 5, Mỹ Hòa 1 Acquired all residential land and house 8 Đặng Kim Tuyết 640/4C, Tây Khánh 5, Mỹ Hòa 1 Acquired all residential land and house



Page 156


9 Lê Thị Kiều Oanh 1 Acquired all residential land and house 10 Nguyễn Ngọc Dung 1 Landless AHs, acquired fully house

11 Phạm Thị Như Ngọc 1 Acquired the only land plot, not affected on house

12 Lê Tấn Thạnh và Trần Thị Mỹ Trang 1


13 Nguyễn Văn Thái Lai 1 Acquired all residential land and house

14 Lê Thị Loan và Huỳnh Văn Hồng 633/4AB, Tây Khánh 5, Mỹ Hòa 1


15 Trương Văn Dũng và Lê Mỹ Tuyết 18D, Phó Quế, Mỹ Long 1

Acquired the only land plot, not affected on house

16 Đoàn Chí Thiện 43, Tây Khánh 5, Mỹ Hòa 1 Landless AHs, acquired fully house 17 Lê Thành Tâm 633/1, Tây Khánh 3, Mỹ Hòa 1 Landless AHs, acquired fully house 18 Phạm Ngọc Phương 431/4C, Tây Khánh 5, Mỹ Hòa 1 Acquired all residential land and house

19 Đặng Thị Sữa: sinh năm 1972 640/4B, Tây Khánh 5, Mỹ Hòa 1


20 Đặng Thị Sữa sinh năm 1968 338/4A, Tây Khánh 5, Mỹ Hòa 1 Acquired all residential land and house

21 Dưỡng Thanh Hải 660/15, Tây Khánh 5, Mỹ Hòa 1 Landless AHs, acquired fully house 22 Hồ Văn Đông Phòng 2, 638/11B, T.Khánh 5, Mỹ Hòa 1 Landless AHs, acquired fully house 23 Hồ Văn Giang Phòng 3, 638/11B, T.Khánh 5, Mỹ Hòa 1 Landless AHs, acquired fully house 24 Truơng Văn Bằng 1 Landless AHs, acquired fully house

25 Nguyễn Văn Ngời (chết) Nguyễn Thị Nhung 1

Landless AHs, acquired fully house

26 Nguyễn Thanh Phương 1 Landless AHs, acquired fully house 27 Đỗ Ngọc Trường 1 Landless AHs, acquired fully house 28 Nguyễn Văn Thơm 1 Landless AHs, acquired fully house

29 Nguyễn Thanh Long 14, Trần B Trọng, Mỹ Xuyên 1 Acquired the only land plot, not affected on house

30 Hoàng Anh Hùng 666/6, Tây Khánh 5, Mỹ Hòa 1 Acquired all residential land and house 31 Hoàng Thị Hải Châu 666/6, Tây Khánh 5, Mỹ Hòa 1 Acquired all residential land and house 32 Võ Thị Mỹ Dung 55, Tây Khánh 5, Mỹ Hòa 1 Acquired all residential land and house 33 Võ Thị Lan Chi 711/2A, Tây Khánh 5, Mỹ Hòa 1 Landless AHs, acquired fully house 34 Nguyễn Văn Phước 654/6A, Tây Khánh 5, Mỹ Hòa 1 Acquired all residential land and house


Page 157


35 Trần Thanh Mai 342/5, Tây Khánh 5, Mỹ Hòa 1 Landless AHs, acquired fully house 36 Trần Thị Hải 342/5, Tây Khánh 4, Mỹ Hòa 1 Acquired all residential land and house 37 Phạm Thị Ánh Hồng 711/2A, Tây Khánh 5, Mỹ Hòa 1 Acquired all residential land and house

38 Phạm Thị Ánh Lùng 711/2B, Tây Khánh 5, Mỹ Hòa 1 Acquired the only land plot, not affected on house

39 Đỗ Thị Sương 658/6, Tây Khánh 5, Mỹ Hòa 1 Landless AHs, acquired fully house

40 Phan Thị Mừng (Đại diện) 654/6, Tây Khánh 5, Mỹ Hòa 1 Acquired all residential land and house

41 Nguyễn Thị Ngọc Giàu 651/6A, Tây Khánh 5, Mỹ Hòa 1 Landless AHs, acquired fully house 42 Ngô Bình Thường 117A, Đ An 5, Mỹ Xuyên 1 Acquired all residential land and house 43 Diệp Thị Minh Phượng 420/12C, Tây Khánh 5, Mỹ Hòa 1 Acquired all residential land and house 44 Lê Thành Trí (Đại diện) 633/4, Tây Khánh 5, Mỹ Hòa 1 Acquired all residential land and house 45 Phan Thị Hoàng Yến 637/4A, Tây Khánh 5, Mỹ Hòa 1 Landless AHs, acquired fully house 46 Đỗ Thị Út Em 1 Landless AHs, acquired fully house

47 Bùi Thị Huỳnh Lê 1 Acquired the only land plot, not affected on house

48 Lê Hùng Phong 21, NV Sở, Đ An, Đông Xuyên 1 Acquired the only land plot, not affected on house

49 Phạm Văn Có 697/6, Tây Khánh 5, Mỹ Hòa 1 Landless AHs, acquired fully house 50 Cao Văn Minh 658/6, Tây Khánh 5, Mỹ Hòa 1 Landless AHs, acquired fully house 51 Cao Thi Chí Lùng 658/6, Tây Khánh 5, Mỹ Hòa 1 Landless AHs, acquired fully house 52 Đỗ Văn Tòng 659/6B, Tây Khánh 5, Mỹ Hòa 1 Landless AHs, acquired fully house 53 Nguyễn Văn Hai 581/9A, Tây Khánh 5, Mỹ Hòa 2 Acquired all residential land and house 54 Dương Thanh Liêm 651/6A, Tây Khánh 5, Mỹ Hòa 1 Acquired all residential land and house

55 Phan Thị Diễm Phương 1105F/56, B Khánh 5, B Khánh 1 Acquired the only land plot, not affected on house

56 Đặng Văn Đọt 634/4A, Tây Khánh 5, Mỹ Hòa 1 Acquired all residential land and house 57 Đỗ Văn Đẹp 689/6B, Tây Khánh 5, Mỹ Hòa 1 Acquired all residential land and house 58 Đặng Văn Bộ 648/4, Tây Khánh 5, Mỹ Hòa 1 Landless AHs, acquired fully house

59 Ngô Thị Phương Anh 23/6, Tây Khánh 5, Mỹ Hòa 1 Built house on agricultural land, acquired fully house

60 Đặng Hoàng Thanh 634/4C, Tây Khánh 5, Mỹ Hòa 1 Acquired all residential land and house



Page 158


61 Lê Minh Nhựt 689/6B, Tây Khánh 5, Mỹ Hòa 1 Landless AHs, acquired fully house 62 Đặng Văn Huyền 645/5A, Tây Khánh 5, Mỹ Hòa 1 Landless AHs, acquired fully house 63 Đỗ Văn Hồ (Đại diện) 659/6, T.Khánh 5, Mỹ Hòa 2 Acquired all residential land and house 64 Đặng Thị Tám 638/4B, Tây Khánh 5, Mỹ Hòa 1 Acquired all residential land and house 65 Huỳnh Thị Bạch 634/4E, Tây Khánh 5, Mỹ Hòa 1 Landless AHs, acquired fully house 66 Hàng Thị Phụng 338/4, Tây Khánh 5, Mỹ Hòa 1 Acquired all residential land and house 67 Nguyễn Thị Thủy 100, Tây Khánh 8, Mỹ Hòa 1 Landless AHs, acquired fully house 68 Trần Quang Trường Phòng 1, 658/8, T. Khánh 5, Mỹ Hòa 1 Landless AHs, acquired fully house 69 Nguyễn Thị Tuyết Trinh 1 Landless AHs, acquired fully house VI My Khanh ward 10 1 Trần Minh Tuấn 265 Tổ 15, ấp Bình Khánh, xã Mỹ Khánh, TPLX 1 Acquired all residential land and house

2 Diệp Văn Dũng 32/4 Lê Văn Nhung, Bình Long 4, Mỹ Bình, TPLX 1 Acquired the only land plot, not affected on house

3 Trần Lê Phương Tổ 10, ấp Bình Khánh, xã Mỹ Khánh, TPLX 1 Acquired all residential land and house 4 Trần Phú Lâm Tổ 10 ấp Bình Khánh, xã Mỹ Khánh, TPLX 1 Landless AHs, acquired fully house 5 Trần Thanh Điền ấp Bình Khánh, xã Mỹ Khánh, TPLX 1 Landless AHs, acquired fully house 6 Lê Thị Thu Ba Tổ 10 ấp Bình Khánh, xã Mỹ Khánh, TPLX 1 Landless AHs, acquired fully house 7 Bùi Thị Thanh Thúy 262/15 ấp Bình Khánh, xã Mỹ Khánh, TPLX 1 Landless AHs, acquired fully house 8 Trần Phú Thọ Tổ 15 ấp Bình Khánh, xã Mỹ Khánh, TPLX 1 Landless AHs, acquired fully house

9 Trần Thị Màu 281A đường liên xã, ấp Bình Khánh, xã Mỹ Khánh,


10 Trần Minh Tuấn (đại diện) 265 Tổ 15, ấp Bình Khánh, xã Mỹ Khánh, TPLX 1

Acquired the only land plot, not affected on house

VII Binh Khanh ward 10 1 Nguyễn Thanh Vũ 575B/29 Bình Khánh 4, Bình Khánh 1 Landless AHs, acquired fully house 2 Nguyễn Công Hầu 541/19 Bình Khánh 4, Bình Khánh 1 Landless AHs, acquired fully house 3 Nguyễn Hữu Danh 577A/29 Bình Khánh 4, Bình Khánh 1 Landless AHs, acquired fully house 4 Nguyễn Hoàng Vũ 577A/29 Bình Khánh 4, Bình Khánh 1 Acquired all residential land and house 5 Nguyễn Hữu Nết 517 Bình Khánh 4, Bình Khánh 1 Acquired all residential land and house

6 Nguyễn Thị Lệ Phi 577B/29 Bình Khánh 4, Bình Khánh 1 Built house on agricultural land, acquired fully house

7 Nguyễn Thị Lược 575/29 Bình Khánh 4, Bình Khánh 1 Acquired all residential land and house 8 Huỳnh Văn Nhành 360C/18 Bình Khánh 7, Bình Khánh 1 Acquired all residential land and house 9 Nguyễn Văn Búa 575A/29 Bình Khánh 4, Bình Khánh 1 Acquired all residential land and house


Page 159


10 Lê Văn Minh 575A/29 Bình Khánh 4, Bình Khánh 1 Landless AHs, acquired fully house VII Binh Duc ward 22

1 Lê Văn Tiền 42A Trần Hưng Đạo, khóm Trung Hưng, phường Mỹ

Thới, TPLX. 1 Acquired all residential land and house

2 Hồ Ngọc Hiếu 348 Trần Hưng Đạo, khóm Bình Đức 4, phường Bình

Đức, TPLX. 1 Acquired the only land plot, not affected on house

3 Hồ Văn Trung 350 Trần Hưng Đạo, khóm Bình Đức 4, phường Bình

Đức, TPLX. 1 Acquired the only land plot, not affected on house

4 Lưu Thị Rớt ấp Hòa Thạnh, xã Hòa Bình Thạnh, huyện Châu

Thành, An Giang. 1 Acquired the only land plot, not affected on

house

5 Hồ Thị Loan 25 đường rạch Cần Xây, khóm Bình Đức 4, phường

Bình Đức, TPLX. 1 Acquired the only land plot, not affected on

house

6 Hồ Thị Chanh khóm Bình Đức 4, phường Bình Đức, TPLX. 1 Acquired the only land plot, not affected on house

7 Võ Trường Linh 247 đường rạch Dầu, khóm Bình Đức 6, phường Bình

Đức, TPLX. 1 Built house on agricultural land, acquired fully house

8 Đinh Võ Minh Thắng 507C/26 khóm Bình Thới 2, phường Bình Khánh,

TPLX. 2

Acquired all residential land and house

9 Nguyễn Chí Thảo 329/1 Hùng Vương, khóm 7, phường Mỹ Long, TPLX. 1 Acquired the only land plot, not affected on house

10 Nguyễn Hữu An 239 tổ 32, khóm Bình Đức 6, phường Bình Đức,

TPLX. 1

Acquired all residential land and house 11 Ngô Thị Rê 922/47 khóm Bình Đức 2, phường Bình Đức, TPLX. 1 Acquired all residential land and house 12 Nguyễn Văn Dân 923A/47 khóm Bình Đức 2, phường Bình Đức, TPLX. 1 Acquired all residential land and house 13 Huỳnh Văn Bạn 924B/47 khóm Bình Đức 2, phường Bình Đức, TPLX. 1 Acquired all residential land and house

14 Nguyễn Thị Mịnh (đại diện) 923/47 khóm Bình Đức 2, phường Bình Đức, TPLX. 2 Acquired all residential land and house

15 Nguyễn Văn Tài 922A/47 khóm Bình Đức 2, phường Bình Đức, TPLX. 1 Acquired all residential land and house

16 Hồ Nhựt Trường 632A/32 khóm Bình Khánh 2, phường Bình Khánh,

TPLX. 1

Acquired all residential land and house 17 Nguyễn Văn Tam 921/47 khóm Bình Đức 2, phường Bình Đức, TPLX. 2 Acquired all residential land and house 18 Nguyễn Thanh Bình 921B/47 khóm Bình Đức 2, phường Bình Đức, TPLX. 1 Landless AHs, acquired fully house



Page 160


19 Nguyễn Thị Ngọc Ánh 1593 Trần Hưng Đạo, khóm Đông Thịnh 7, Mỹ Phước,

TPLX. 1 Acquired the only land plot, not affected on

house Total: 140 AHs 145


Page 161

Appendix 12: List of vulnerable households

No Address Address

Type of vulnerable HH

Total Poor HH

Near poor HH

Women HHH with

depentdents

Policy HH

Disabled HH

Elderly Landless

HH EM

I My Thanh ward 0 1 0 0 0 0 7 0 7

1 Ông Lâm Tùng Cương

1/13 khóm Thới Thạnh, P.Mỹ Thạnh, TPLX. x

2 Ông Nguyễn Văn Nam

97 khóm Thới Thạnh, P.Mỹ Thạnh, TPLX. x

3 Bà Mai Thị Liễu Nương

1/13A khóm Thới An A, P.Mỹ Thạnh, TPLX. x

4 Bà Lê Thị Mỏng

1/6B khóm Thới An A, P.Mỹ Thạnh, TPLX. x

5 Ông Nguyễn Văn Thúc Em

1/3A khóm Thới An A, P.Mỹ Thạnh, TPLX. x x

6 Bà Nguyễn Thị Ngọc Bích 1/3 khóm Thới An A, P.Mỹ Thạnh, TPLX. x

7 Bà Bùi Thị Ngọc Tuyết 408/1 khóm Thới An A, P.Mỹ Thạnh, TPLX. x

II My Thoi ward 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3

1 Ông Cù Quang Hồng và Nguyễn Thị Bé

310 khóm Tây An, phường Mỹ Thới, TPLX x

2 Hồ Thị Mến 301/30 Trần Hưng Đạo, phường Mỹ Long x

3 Ông Lê Văn Khiết 41/7A khóm Tây Thạnh, P. Mỹ Thới x

III Phường Mỹ Quý 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3



Page 162

No Address Address


Total Poor HH

Near poor HH

Women HHH with

depentdents

Policy HH

Disabled HH

Elderly Landless

HH EM

1 Lê Thị Hồng Thắm 157 khóm Tân Phú, phường Mỹ Quý, TPLX x

2 Trần Bửu Châu 1030/20D khóm Tân Phú, phường Mỹ Quý x

3 Lê Thị Cẩm Duyên 52/13 khóm Tân Phú, phường Mỹ Quý, TPLX x

IV My Phuoc ward 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 7

1 Dương Văn Bé Út 187/G khóm Đông Thịnh 8, phường Mỹ Phước, TPLX

x

2 Dương văn Hoàng 142/42K khóm Đông Thịnh 8, phường Mỹ Phước, TPLX

x

3 Nguyễn Văn Phấn 187/8F/42K khóm Đông Thịnh 8, phường Mỹ Phước, TPLX

x

4 Nguyễn Tấn Bình 236 khóm Đông Thịnh 9, phường Mỹ Phước x

5 Nguyễn Văn Trí Phòng 1, 1044/20A khóm Đông Thịnh 9, phường Mỹ Phước

x

6 Nguyễn Quốc Việt 1044/20A khóm Đông Thịnh 9, phường Mỹ Phước, TPLX

x

7 Nguyễn Tấn Phúc 78/2 khóm Bình Thới 3, phường Bình Khánh x

V My Hoa ward 0 2 2 1 2 0 44 0 46

1 Nguyễn Cẩm Thúy P. Mỹ Hòa x

2 Nguyễn Thị Chúc Ly P. Mỹ Hòa x

3 Phạm Triều Vương P. Đông Xuyên x


Page 163

No Address Address


Total Poor HH

Near poor HH

Women HHH with

depentdents

Policy HH

Disabled HH

Elderly Landless

HH EM

4 Nguyễn Văn Khoái P. Mỹ Hòa x

5 Trần Thị Tuyết Vân P. Mỹ Hòa x

6 Nguyễn Thị Lắm P. Mỹ Hòa x

7 Nguyễn Ngọc Dung P. Mỹ Hòa x

8 Trương Anh Thư P. Mỹ Hòa x

9 Cao Thị Hoa P. Mỹ Hòa x

10 Đoàn Chí Thiện P. Mỹ Hòa x

11 Lê Thành Tâm P. Mỹ Hòa x

12 Dưỡng Thanh Hải P. Mỹ Hòa x

13 Hồ Văn Đông P. Mỹ Hòa x

14 Hồ Văn Giang P. Mỹ Hòa x

15 Đặng Thị Tám P. Mỹ Hòa x

16 Đặng Văn Bộ P. Mỹ Hòa x

17 Nguyễn Thị Ngọc Giàu P. Mỹ Hòa x

18 Trần Quang Trường P. Mỹ Hòa x

19 Nguyễn Thị Thủy P. Mỹ Hòa x

20 Phan Thị Hoàng Yến P. Mỹ Hòa x



Page 164

No Address Address


Total Poor HH

Near poor HH

Women HHH with

depentdents

Policy HH

Disabled HH

Elderly Landless

HH EM

21 Huỳnh Thị Bạch P. Mỹ Hòa x x x

22 Đỗ Văn Tòng P. Mỹ Hòa x

23 Lê Minh Nhựt P. Mỹ Hòa x

24 Cao Thị Chí Lùng P. Mỹ Hòa x

25 Phạm Văn Có P. Mỹ Hòa x

26 Đô Thị Út Em P. Mỹ Hòa x

27 Đặng Văn Huyền P. Mỹ Hòa x

28 Cao Văn Minh P. Mỹ Hòa x

29 Đỗ Thị Sương P. Mỹ Hòa x

30 Nguyễn Hùng Tráng P. Mỹ Hòa x

31 Nguyễn Văn Mẫn P. Mỹ Hòa x

32 Nguyễn Ngọc Minh P. Mỹ Hòa x

33 Nguyễn Văn Dũng P. Mỹ Hòa x

34 Võ Thị Lan Chi P. Mỹ Hòa x x x

35 Trần Thanh Mai P. Mỹ Hòa x

36 Nguyễn Thị Kim Loan P. Mỹ Hòa x

37 Đỗ Thanh Vân P. Mỹ Hòa x

38 Lê Thị Cẩm Dúng P. Mỹ Hòa x


Page 165

No Address Address


Total Poor HH

Near poor HH

Women HHH with

depentdents

Policy HH

Disabled HH

Elderly Landless

HH EM

39 Phạm Hà Cưng P. Mỹ Hòa x

40 Nguyễn Văn Cập P. Mỹ Hòa x

41 Nguyễn Thị Nhung (con ông Ngời, đã chết)

P. Mỹ Hòa x

42 Nguyễn Thanh Phương P. Mỹ Hòa x

43 Đỗ ngọc Trường P. Mỹ Hòa x

44 Nguyễn Văn Thơm P. Mỹ Hòa x

45 Trương Văn Bằng P. Mỹ Hòa x x

46 Nguyễn Thị Tuyết Trinh P. Mỹ Hòa x

VI My Khanh ward 0 0 0 0 4 0 6 0 10

1 Trần Minh Tuấn (đại diện)

265 Tổ 15, ấp Bình Khánh, xã Mỹ Khánh, TPLX

x

2 Tống Văn Thang 367/19 ấp Bình Khánh, xã Mỹ Khánh, TPLX

x

3 Trương Thị Nói Tổ 8 ấp Bình Khánh, xã Mỹ Khánh, TPLX x

4 Nguyễn Thị Sen (đại diện) Tổ 11 ấp Bình Khánh, xã Mỹ Khánh, TPLX x

5 Trần Phú Lâm Tổ 10 ấp Bình Khánh, xã Mỹ Khánh, TPLX x



Page 166

No Address Address


Total Poor HH

Near poor HH

Women HHH with

depentdents

Policy HH

Disabled HH

Elderly Landless

HH EM

6 Trần Thanh Điền ấp Bình Khánh, xã Mỹ Khánh, TPLX x

7 Lê Thị Thu Ba Tổ 10 ấp Bình Khánh, xã Mỹ Khánh, TPLX x

8 Bùi Thị Thanh Thúy 262/15 ấp Bình Khánh, xã Mỹ Khánh, TPLX x

9 Trần Phú Thọ Tổ 15 ấp Bình Khánh, xã Mỹ Khánh, TPLX x

10 Trần Thị Màu 281A đường liên xã, ấp Bình Khánh, xã Mỹ Khánh, TPLX

x

VII Binh Khanh ward 0 0 2 0 0 0 4 0 6

1 Nguyễn Thanh Vũ 575B/29 Bình Khánh 4, Bình Khánh x

2 Nguyễn Hà Triều 609C/31 Bình Khánh 4, Bình Khánh x

3 Nguyễn Công Hầu 541/19 Bình Khánh 4, Bình Khánh x

4 Nguyễn Thị Thúy Mai 509/26 Bình Khánh 4, Bình Khánh x

5 Lương Thị Thu Thúy 1004A/51 Bình Đức 2, Bình Đức x

6 Lê Văn Minh 575A/29 Bình Khánh 4, Bình Khánh x

VIII Binh Duc ward 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

1 Nguyễn Thanh Bình 921B/47 khóm Bình Đức 2, phường Bình Đức, TPLX

x

Total 0 3 7 1 9 0 69 0 83


Page 167

Appendix 13 : TOR for external monitor consultant

1. Objectives of the External Monitoring

The objectives of the external monitoring are:

• To verify internal monitoring information • To verify whether the overall project and resettlement objectives are being met in

accordance with the uRP, and if not to suggest corrective measures; • To assess the extent to which implementation of the RP17 complies with ADB’s

Safeguards Policy Statement (SPS): • To identify problems or potential problems; • To verify if the livelihoods and the standard of living of affected persons (APs), including

those of the non-titled displaced persons, are restored or improved;

2. Main Tasks of Monitoring

The External Monitoring Consultant (EMC) will address specific issues such as the following:

• Verify the DMS database generated by the CIPM/Center for Land Fund Development and identify differences in DMS recorded in the uRP, and document changes to the database;

• Confirm that all APs are eligible for compensation, resettlement and rehabilitation assistance, irrespective of tenure status, social or economic standing, and any such factors that may discriminate against achieving the project objectives;

• Payment of compensation, allowances and other assistance are as per approved uRP; • Confirm timing of disbursement of payment; and assess that the level of compensation

is sufficient to replace their losses. • Public consultation and awareness of key information in the resettlement plan18; • Coordination of resettlement activities with construction schedule; • Land acquisition and transfer procedures; • Construction of replacement houses and structures on remaining land, relocation sites

(outside the remaining land), and self-selected land; • Implementation of gender measures as indicated in the uRP; • Level of satisfaction of APs with the provisions and implementation of the uRP; • Effectiveness of grievance redress mechanism (accessibility, documentation, process,

resolution); • Effectiveness, sufficiency, impact and sustainability of entitlements, assistance and

income restoration programs and the need for further improvement and corrective measures for both RP, if any;

• Resettlement site development (civic infrastructure and community services as required), identification and selection of sites in consultation with APs and host communities, equivalent or enhanced access to livelihood opportunities; process and timeliness of providing land titles/certificates;

• Capacity of APs to restore/re-establish livelihoods and living standards. Special attention will be given to severely affected APs and vulnerable APs;

• Involuntary resettlement impacts caused during construction activities; • Participation of APs in uRP implementation; and,

17 Including updating of the RP 18 Scope of Land Acquisition and Resettlement Impacts, Entitlement Matrix, Grievance Redress Mechanism



Page 168

• Adequacy of budget and human resources19 at executing agency/implementing agency level for resettlement activities, including internal monitoring.

3. Methods for External Monitoring

The methods for external monitoring activities include:

• Review of detailed measurement survey (DMS) process to be able to establish a baseline for monitoring and evaluating project benefits. The EMC will check on a random basis the DMS process with APs, from identification to agreement on DMS results. The EMC will also evaluate the DMS process to determine and assess whether DMS activities was carried out in a participatory and transparent manner.

• Resettlement audit is conducted during monitoring. The EMC will carry out random checks of payments disbursed to APs during monitoring. The EMC will submit a resettlement audit report upon completion of compensation payment to APs.

• Review of socioeconomic data20 prepared during the preparation stage. With this review, the DMS data, and additional data compiled, the EMC will provide the baseline data to be used in comparison to the post-resettlement survey. A post resettlement survey will be carried out one year following completion of all resettlement activities, including livelihood restoration activities. Sampling will include at least 20% of severely affected and vulnerable households, as well as at least 10% of all other APs. Special attention will be paid to the inclusion of women, the poor, the landless and other vulnerable groups, with set of questions for women and other target groups. The database will disaggregate information by gender and vulnerability.

• Participatory Rapid Appraisal (PRA), which will involve obtaining information, identifying existing or potential problems, and finding specific time-bound solutions through participatory means including: a) key informant interviews including representatives of civil society, community groups, and non-governmental organizations; b) focus group discussions (FGDs) on specific topics such as compensation payment, income restoration and relocation21; c) community public meetings to discuss community losses, integration of resettled households in host communities; d) direct field observations, for example, of resettlement site development; e) formal and informal interviews with affected households, women, and vulnerable groups to monitor and assess the progress the APs are making to restore their living standards, APs’ perceived need for additional assistance (and type of assistance), and their individual satisfaction with current economic activities; and, f) in-depth case studies of problems identified by internal or external monitoring that required special efforts to resolve. The PRA will also focus on good practices in land acquisition and involuntary resettlement objectives, approaches, and implementation strategies.

• Review the results of internal monitoring.

4. Post-completion Evaluation

A post-completion evaluation will be carried out one year following completion of all resettlement activities, including livelihood restoration activities. For the post resettlement evaluation, the EMC will:

• Carry-out a survey of affected households to compare with the baseline survey data to assess if income of affected households and other living conditions have been

19 Assessment of human resources is in terms of both number of staffs assigned, as well as capacity 20 Possible data sources include: census, inventory of loss-socioeconomic survey (IOL-SES), village records/documents 21 Groups that may be targeted for involvement in FGDs include AHs in general, and vulnerable AHs such as women-headed households, the poor, and ethnic minorities


Page 169

restored as pre-project. The survey will cover at least 20% of severely affected households, 100% of affected poor, landless and female headed households, as well as at least 10% of all other affected households. The database will disaggregate information by gender and vulnerability.

• Conduct Participatory Rapid Appraisal (PRA), which will involve obtaining information identifying remaining/outstanding problems and finding specific time-bound solutions through participatory means including: a) key informant interviews including representatives of civil society, community groups, NGOs; b) focus group discussions (FGDs) on specific topics such as outstanding issued related to compensation payment, income restoration and relocation; c) direct field observations, for example, completion of resettlement site development; d) formal and informal interviews with affected households, women and vulnerable groups to conclude on the remaining and outstanding issues.

• Discuss with the EA and IA on the completion of land acquisition and resettlement as well as the remaining/outstanding issues and commitments on actions, timeframe, resources and reporting of EA and IA to completely resolve the remaining/outstanding issues (if any).

• Review the results of the mid-term and final evaluation of the HIV and Human Trafficking Awareness and Prevention Program and Community-based Road Safety Awareness Program

5. Schedule & Team Composition

Independent monitoring and evaluation should be conducted by a consultant agency (research institute, consultancy firm or NGO), with sufficient capacity and experience in monitoring, evaluating socio-economic survey and implementation of uRP. The EMC will be hired by ADB.

The EMC will be responsible for preparing periodic reports on progress and recommending solutions to issues arising during the monitoring process. External monitoring activities will be carried out for a period of at least 2 years on a semi-annual basis starting from the conduct of DMS until the completion of livelihood/income restoration activities.

The post-completion evaluation will be carried out one year following completion of all resettlement activities. Information presented in the reports should be disaggregated by sex and ethnicity. All reports will be prepared in English and Vietnamese and submitted to MOT and ADB simultaneously on a semi-annual basis.

6. Timing & Team Composition

External monitoring activities will be carried out for a period of 2 years on a quarterly basis. The quarterly report will summarize the findings of the EMC, including (a) progress of uRP implementation, including any deviations from the provisions of the uRP; (b) identification of problem issues and recommended solutions to inform implementing agencies and resolve issues in a timely manner; (c) identification of specific gender or other social issues, as relevant; and (d) report on progress of the follow-up of issues and problems identified in the previous reports.



Page 170

The EMC will be composed of one team leader with extensive experience in monitoring and evaluation of resettlement activities in Vietnam with strong ability in preparing resettlement reports. He/she should demonstrate good communication skill and have at least a bachelor degree in a relevant field. The team leader will be assisted by at least two (2) social enumerators. All reports will be submitted to CIPM and ADB simultaneously. Post-evaluation activities will also be carried out one (1) year after the completion of all relocation activities.

7. Deliverables:

• Inception report - The report will include finalization of indicators, schedule, methodology

• Semi-annual monitoring reports. • Post-completion evaluation report. Submission of evaluation report will be within one

month after post-evaluation activities.


Page 171

Sample Monitoring and Evaluation Indicators

Type Indicator Examples of Variables PROCESS INDICATOR

Consultation, Participation

- Number of consultation held with various stakeholders

Procedures in Operation

- Census and asset verification/quantification procedures in place;

- Effectiveness of compensation delivery system; - Coordination between implementing agencies and other

agencies; OUTPUT INDICATOR

Structures - Number, type and size of private houses/structures acquired;

- Number, type and size of community buildings acquired Trees and Crops

- Number and type of private trees acquired; - Number and type of government/community trees

acquired; - Number and type of crops acquired; - Crops destroyed by area, type and number of owners

Compensation and Rehabilitation

- Number of households affected (land, structures, trees, crops);

- Number of owners compensated by type of loss; - Amount compensated by type and owner; - Number and amount of payment paid;

IMPACT INDICATOR

Changes to Status of Women

- Participation in public consultation; - Participation in project construction; - Participation in livelihood development program

Compensation and Rehabilitation

- Number of households affected (for land, buildings, trees, crops);

- Number of owners compensated by type of loss; - Amount compensated by type and owner; - Number and amount of allowances paid; - Number of replacement houses constructed by owners; - Number of replacement businesses constructed by

owners; - Number of owners requesting assistance to purchase

replacement land, and number of purchases effected; - Number of individual sites and levels of development of

sites; - Number of entitlements delivered; - Number of entitlements used by APs; - Suitability of entitlements to affected households as per

uRP objectives; - Number of vulnerable that are relocated in the same village

and communes/ward; - Number of non-titled affected households receiving

replacement land; and - Number of severely affected, very poor or other vulnerable

households receiving special assistance and participating in livelihood development programs

Household Earning Capacity

- Employment status of economically active members; - Landholding size, area cultivated and production volume,

by crop; - Selling of cultivation land; - Changes to livestock ownership - pre- and post-



Page 172

Type Indicator Examples of Variables disturbance;

- Changes to income-earning activities (farm and off-farm) pre and post-disturbance; and

- Amount and balance of income and expenditures. - Change in poverty rates.


Page 173

Appendix 14: Some pictures taken at the expanded resettlement site on West of University

Documents

40255-033: Central Mekong Delta Region Connectivity Project · Central Mekong Delta Region Connectivity Project - Component 4 Resettlement Plan Page ii NOTES This Updated Resettlement