Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
4254 CHESTNUT STREETPHILADELPHIA, PA 19104CIVIC DESIGN REVIEWSeptember 3, 3019
| 3
4254 CHESTNUT STREET | CIVIC DESIGN REVIEW : September 3, 2019
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION
LOCATION PLAN
CONTEXT PHOTOGRAPHS
EXISTING SITE SURVEY
PROPOSED SITE PLAN
PLANS
BUILDING ELEVATIONS
LANDSCAPE PLAN
MATERIALS
BUILDING SECTIONS
PERSPECTIVES
MASSING STUDIES
CDR APPLICATION
SUSTAINABILITY QUESTIONNAIRE
COMPLETE STREETS CHECKLIST
CONTENTS
4
5
6-9
10
11
13-17
18-21
22
23
24-25
27-29
30-31
32
33
34-40
4254 CHESTNUT STREET | CIVIC DESIGN REVIEW : September 3, 2019
4 |
4240 Chestnut is a proposed 7 story, 111,894 SF, mixed use office and residential apartment building. The site consists of one lot totaling 22,991 SF which runs along Chestnut Street near the intersection of 43rd Street. The lot is flanked by a 3 story townhome on the East and a new 5+ story apartment building on the West. The zoning for the site is classified as CMX-4, which generally allows for 100% lot coverage and an FAR of 500% plus a bonus for underground accessory parking.
The building design encompasses a two story commercial base with five stories of wood frame apartments above, and a single level underground parking garage.
The playful aesthetic and selective use of color of the proposed architecture which defines the “Intercultural Family Services” office is driven by a desire to convey to the surrounding community a sense of excitement and optimism. The design in also influenced by the necessity and importance of creating identity and adding character which is reinforced through the varied use of layering materials and careful articulation of the façade.
The 35,489 SF commercial base is designed for “Intercultural Family Services”, a non-profit community organization, whose main entrance will be at the center of the Chestnut Street frontage. One elevator and an open monumental stair under a large skylight serve as the their lobby centerpiece and circulation zone.
The five story apartment complex above is designed to accommodate 102 apartment units. The residential entrance will be located at the eastern end of the site where a secure lobby and access to two elevators is located. The residential amenity spaces include a small fitness room, a study lounge and a rooftop deck. The typical units are studio and 1 bedroom units, +/- 22’ wide X 23.5’ deep, and approximately 500 SF.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
INTRODUCTION
Offices : 35,459 sf
Residents : 76,435 sf
Total : 111,894 sf
MIXED USE SF PROGRAM SUMMARY
District : CMX-4
Lot Area: 22,991 sf
Max FAR (500%) : 114,955 sf
Max Height: No Limit
Bulk + Massing Controls: 100% up to 65’
ZONING DATA
The project design incorporates green roofs covering roughly 80% of the site. These work to manage stormwater runoff, reduce heat island effects and also provide a layer of water purification before water enters the stormwater management system.
SUSTAINABILITY
The pedestrian experience along Chestnut Street will be improved by the addition of 5 street trees and proposed planters on each side of the main entrance. Trash holding and collection will be located within the garage, and a loading zone will be provided on Chestnut Street.
In addition to the 7 story mixed use structure, and as noted, the project will include one level of underground parking with 40 spaces for both Intercultural Family Services and the apartment residents. The ramp down into the self-park garage will be covered. The garage will include elevator access to Intercultural Family Services and the residents with three passenger elevators, one for the offices and two for the residents.
The proposed building materials and design embody a palette of playful and compelling products, patterns, and textures that formally define the difference uses of the building while maintaining an overall cohesive aesthetic.
The ground floor offices feature storefront glazing with a blend of transparent, translucent, and opaque glazing as well as articulated metal work and colored frames.
The residential façade materials include: cast in place concrete, articulated metalwork and frames, anodized aluminum storefront and glazing system, and corrugated metal cladding. The façade design incorporates staggered vertical joint patterns and cut-away areas to add shadow and depth to the overall façade.
MATERIALS
| 5
4254 CHESTNUT STREET | CIVIC DESIGN REVIEW : September 3, 2019
SITE + CONTEXT : LOCATION PLAN
SITE
4254 CHESTNUT STREET | CIVIC DESIGN REVIEW : September 3, 2019
6 | SITE + CONTEXT : AERIEL PHOTOGRAPHS
SITE
SITE
CHESTNUT STREET
SANSOM
43RD
STR
EET
42N
D S
TREE
T
| 7
4254 CHESTNUT STREET | CIVIC DESIGN REVIEW : September 3, 2019
SITE + CONTEXT : PHOTOGRAPHS
4 6
1
5
38
7
2
SITE
4254 CHESTNUT STREET | CIVIC DESIGN REVIEW : September 3, 2019
8 | SITE + CONTEXT : PHOTOGRAPHS
1
2
3
4
| 9
4254 CHESTNUT STREET | CIVIC DESIGN REVIEW : September 3, 2019
SITE + CONTEXT : PHOTOGRAPHS
5
6
7
8
MAP #17S13PARCEL #203
MAP #17S13PARCEL #229
MAP #17S13PARCEL #230
MAP
#17
S13
PAR
CEL
#17
2
MAP
#17
S13
PAR
CEL
#17
3
MAP #17S13PARCEL #162
MAP
#17
S13
PAR
CEL
#14
6 MAP
#17
S13
PAR
CEL
#14
5
MAP #17S13PARCEL #144
MAP
#17
S13
PAR
CEL
#14
3
MAP
#17
S13
PAR
CEL
#15
1
MAP
#17
S13
PAR
CEL
#15
0
MAP
#17
S13
PAR
CEL
#14
9
CHESTNUT STREET
SANSOM STREET
SOU
TH 4
3RD
STR
EET
20 20 40
SCALE : 1" = 20'
0
N
S
E
W
NO
RTH
EXISTING CONDITION PLAN
1
RHETT N. CHILIBERTIENGINEER - LICENSE NUMBER: PE73158
PENNSYLVANIA REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL
SHEET NUMBER:
SCALE:
PROJECT NUMBER:
DRAWN BY:DATE:
DRAWING NAME:
CHECKED BY:
SHEET TITLE:
REV
DA
TE
DR
AW
N B
YD
ESC
RIP
TIO
N
Customer Loyalty through Client Satisfactionw w w . m a s e r c o n s u l t i n g . c o m
PROTECT YOURSELF
Copyright © 2019. Maser Consulting. All Rights Reserved. This drawing and allthe information contained herein is authorized for use only by the party forwhom the services were contracted or to whom it is certified. This drawing maynot be copied, reused, disclosed, distributed or relied upon for any other purpose
without the express written consent of Maser Consulting, P.A.
ALL STATES REQUIRE NOTIFICATION OFEXCAVATORS, DESIGNERS, OR ANY PERSON
PREPARING TO DISTURB THE EARTH'SSURFACE ANYWHERE IN ANY STATE
Office Locations:
FOR STATE SPECIFIC DIRECT PHONE NUMBERS VISIT:WWW.CALL811.COM
n NEW JERSEY • Red Bank • Clinton • Hamilton • Egg Harbor • Montvale • Mt. Arlington • Mt. Laurel
n NEW YORK • Albany • New Windsor • Westchester
n NEW MEXICO • Albuquerque
n MARYLAND • Columbia
n TEXAS • College Station
n COLORADO • Denver
n FLORIDA • Tampa • Orlando • Miami • Jacksonville
n PENNSYLVANIA • Lehigh Valley • Exton • Philadelphia • Pittsburgh
• Charlotte • Raleighn VIRGINIA
• Sterling • Norfolkn TENNESSEE
• Nashvillen INDIANA
• Lafayette
C-BASE
2019
\190
0098
0A\E
ngin
eeri
ng\C
DR
Pla
ns\R
ev-0
\C-B
ASE
.dw
g\01
-Exi
stin
g C
ond
Plan
B
y: M
BUST
OS
PHILADELPHIA OFFICE2 Penn Center
Suite 2221500 JFK Boulevard
Philadelphia, PA 19102
Phone: 215.861.9021Fax: 215.977.2887
R
EXISTING CONDITIONPLAN
4240 CHESTNUTCRCP, LLC
LOCATION:4240, 4242, 4244, 4248-50, 4254& 4256 CHESTNUT STREETPHILADELPHIA, PA 19104
AS SHOWN 07/22/19 VJC RNC
19000980A
1
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
__________________________
of
FOR
SITE
ABBREVIATIONS
RIGHT OF WAY/ADJACENT PROPERTY LINE
DEPRESSED CURB
INLET
UTILITY POLE W/ STREET LIGHT
UTILITY POLE
TRAFFIC SIGNAL POLE
VENTUNKNOWN VALVE
SANITARY CLEANOUTGAS VALVE
WATER VALVE
TREE
STREET LIGHT
HYDRANT
MANHOLE
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC FLOW
P.D.S = PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT STANDARD
U.S.S= UNITED STATE STANDARD
FF= FINISH FLOOR
UV= UNKNOWN VALVE
DEP.= DEPRESSED
CL= CENTER LINE
D.C. = DEPRESSED CURB
BC= BOTTOM OF CURB
TC = TOP OF CURB
UP = UTILITY POLE
LP= LIGHT POLE
TBR= TO BE REMOVED
MH= MANHOLE
BOL= BOLLARD
GR= GRATE
TR= TO REMAIN
TW= TOP OF WALL
BW= BOTTOM OF WALL
CP= CITY PLAN
LEGEND
PROPERTY LINE
OVERHEAD WIRE
FENCE
BUILDING AREA
4254 CHESTNUT STREET | CIVIC DESIGN REVIEW : September 3, 2019
10 | SITE SURVEY
MAP #17S13PARCEL #203
MAP
#17
S13
PAR
CEL
#17
2
MAP
#17
S13
PAR
CEL
#17
3
MAP #17S13PARCEL #162
MAP
#17
S13
PAR
CEL
#14
3
MAP
#17
S13
PAR
CEL
#15
1
MAP
#17
S13
PAR
CEL
#15
0
MAP
#17
S13
PAR
CEL
#14
9
CHESTNUT STREET
SANSOM STREET
PROPOSEDCURB (TYP.)
XXXXXXXXXXX
XX
XX
XX
XX
XX
X
PROPOSED 7 STORYMIXED USE BUILDING W/
UNDERGROUNDPARKING GARAGE
PROPOSED CONCRETESIDEWALK (TYP)
F.F.E= 69.59 G.F.E= 56.59
109'
125'
160'
9'
51'
105'
55' 47'PROPOSED METAL FENCE
(6 FT MAX. HEIGHT)(TYP.)
PRO
PER
TYN
OT
INC
LUD
ED
ZONED= CMX-4
PRO
PER
TYN
OT
INC
LUD
ED
PRO
PER
TYN
OT
INC
LUD
ED
PRO
PER
TYN
OT
INC
LUD
ED
PRO
PER
TYN
OT
INC
LUD
ED
PRO
PER
TYN
OT
INC
LUD
ED
PROPERTYNOT INCLUDED
ZONED= RM-1
ZONED= CMX-4
43'
PROP.4.7'FURNISHING ZONE
PROP.13.4'WALKING ZONE
TIE INTOEX.SIDEWALK/CURB
TIE INTOEX.SIDEWALK/CURB
PROPOSED 4' X 4'TREE PITS (TYP.)
PROPOSED 8' X 18' "NO PARKING MARKING"
(TYP.)
LOT #2VACANT
LOT #1
PROPOSED9' CANOPY(+/-129 SF)
PROPOSEDPLANTER (TYP.)
PROPOSED DOORLOCATION (TYP.)
ZONED= RM-1
F.F.E= 69.07
2'
20 20 40
SCALE : 1" = 20'
0
N
S
E
W
NO
RTH
SITE PLAN
1
RHETT N. CHILIBERTIENGINEER - LICENSE NUMBER: PE73158
PENNSYLVANIA REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL
ABBREVIATIONSP.D.S = PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT STANDARD
U.S.S= UNITED STATE STANDARD
FF= FINISH FLOOR
UV= UNKNOWN VALVE
DEP.= DEPRESSED
CL= CENTER LINE
D.C. = DEPRESSED CURB
BC= BOTTOM OF CURB
TC = TOP OF CURB
UP = UTILITY POLE
LP= LIGHT POLE
TBR= TO BE REMOVED
MH= MANHOLE
BOL= BOLLARD
GR= GRATE
TR= TO REMAIN
TW= TOP OF WALL
BW= BOTTOM OF WALL
CP= CITY PLAN
(5) QUERCUS PHELLOS (WILLOW OAK)
LEGEND
SHEET NUMBER:
SCALE:
PROJECT NUMBER:
DRAWN BY:DATE:
DRAWING NAME:
CHECKED BY:
SHEET TITLE:
REV
DA
TE
DR
AW
N B
YD
ESC
RIP
TIO
N
Customer Loyalty through Client Satisfactionw w w . m a s e r c o n s u l t i n g . c o m
PROTECT YOURSELF
Copyright © 2019. Maser Consulting. All Rights Reserved. Thisdrawing and all the information contained herein is authorized foruse only by the party for whom the services were contracted or towhom it is certified. This drawing may not be copied, reused,disclosed, distributed or relied upon for any other purpose without
the express written consent of Maser Consulting, P.A.
ALL STATES REQUIRE NOTIFICATION OFEXCAVATORS, DESIGNERS, OR ANY PERSON
PREPARING TO DISTURB THE EARTH'SSURFACE ANYWHERE IN ANY STATE
Office Locations:
FOR STATE SPECIFIC DIRECT PHONE NUMBERSVISIT: WWW.CALL811.COM
n NEW JERSEYn NEW YORKn PENNSYLVANIAn VIRGINIAn FLORIDAn NORTH CAROLINA
n NEW MEXICOn MARYLANDn GEORGIAn TEXASn TENNESSEEn COLORADO
C-BASE-LAYT
2019
\190
0098
0A\E
ngin
eeri
ng\C
DR
Pla
ns\R
ev-0
\C-B
ASE
-LA
YT
.dw
g\01
-Site
Pla
n
By: M
BUST
OS PHILADELPHIA OFFICE
2 Penn CenterSuite 222
1500 JFK BoulevardPhiladelphia, PA 19102
Phone: 215.861.9021Fax: 215.977.2887
R
NOTE: DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS FOR CONSTRUCTION.
SITE PLAN
4240 CHESTNUTCRCP, LLC
LOCATION:4240, 4242, 4244,4248-50,4254& 4256 CHESTNUT STREETPHILADELPHIA, PA 19104
AS SHOWN 08/06/19 MAB RNC
19000980A
1
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
__________________________
of
FOR
| 11
4254 CHESTNUT STREET | CIVIC DESIGN REVIEW : September 3, 2019
PLAN : PROPOSED SITE PLAN
4254 CHESTNUT STREET | CIVIC DESIGN REVIEW : September 3, 2019
12 |
UP DN
UP
UPDN
ART THERAPY
INTAKE
FLEX MEETING
KITCHEN
MEDICAL DIR.
DIR. OUTPATIENT
OFFICE
OFFICE
OFFICE
IFS RECEPTION LOBBY
INTAKE
SAFE RM.FAMILY WAITING
EVALUATION
THERAPY
SECURITY
LG. THERAPYADA THERAPY
LG. THERAPY
LG. THERAPYTHERAPY
THERAPY
THERAPY
THERAPY THERAPY THERAPY THERAPY THERAPY
ART STORAGE
MAIL/PKG.
THERAPY
IFS ENTRY VESTIBULE RESIDENTIAL
ENTRY
RESIDENTIAL ELEV. LOBBY
ADULT WAITING
WOMEN
MEN
COATS
TRAINING ROOM
RESOURCE CTR.
STORAGE
JAN.
MEDICAL RECORDS
THERAPY
H.P. OFFICE
H.P. OFFICE
SAFE PLAY
H.P. OFFICE
FACILITY SUP.
KITCHEN
H.P. STORAGE
FACILITY STORAGE
STAGEPREP KITCHEN
THERAPY
COATSSTOR.
COPY
TRASH
RECEPTION
AUDITORIUM
EVALUATION
CHESTNUT ST
RAMP DN
CHESTNUT ST
AWNING ABOVE
TINTED CONCRETE SIDEWALK
GREEN ROOF
LINE OF BUILDING ABOVE
| 13
4254 CHESTNUT STREET | CIVIC DESIGN REVIEW : September 3, 2019
PLAN : PROPOSED 1ST FLOOR
LEGEND
RESIDENTIAL
OFFICES
VERTICAL CIRCULATION
UTILITIES
PARKING GARAGE
UP
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10*
11
12
13
14
15
16
202122*232425
28
27
26
29
30
40
32
39 38 37 36*
33 34 35*
31
402 SFMECH
734 SFMECH
164 SFELEV LOBBY
101 SFTRASH
19 18 17
61 SFIFS
RAMP UP
BIKE RACKS
156 SFTRASH
BIKE RACKS
4254 CHESTNUT STREET | CIVIC DESIGN REVIEW : September 3, 2019
14 | PLAN : PROPOSED LOWER LEVEL
LEGEND
RESIDENTIAL
OFFICES
VERTICAL CIRCULATION
UTILITIES
PARKING GARAGE
UP
DN
DNDN
UP
DN
CEO OFFICE DEP. DIR. OFFICE
EXEC. OFFICE
EXEC. OFFICE
EXEC. OFFICE
EXEC. OFFICE
BOARD ROOM
IT
TRUANCY SPR.
TRUANCY DIR.
TRUANCY SPR.
BHRS RECORDS
BHRS SPR.BHRS SPR.FES SPR.
H.S. SPR.
COPY ROOM
BHRS SPR.
BHRS SPR.
DIRECTOR
MEETING ROOM
H.S. RECORDS
MEETING ROOM
BREAK ROOM
HR
ACCOUNT MGR.
ACCOUNTING
BILLINGQA
BILLING FILESQA FILES
OFFICE
EXEC.ASST.
COMP. LAB
FES SPR.
TRUANCY RECORDS
DIRECTOR
COPY
BILLING MGR.
QA DIRECTOR
COPY
KITCHEN
CASE MANAGERS
WOMEN
MEN
LIBRARY
KITCHEN
SUPPLY/PURCH.
IT EQUIP.
HR DIR.
COPY
WORK POD
WORK POD
WORK POD
HR FILES
MTG. RM.
EXPANSION OPEN OFFICE
TRASH
CHESTNUT ST
FES RECORDS
AWNING
GREEN ROOF BELOW
GREEN ROOF BELOW
| 15
4254 CHESTNUT STREET | CIVIC DESIGN REVIEW : September 3, 2019
PLAN : PROPOSED 2ND FLOOR
LEGEND
RESIDENTIAL
OFFICES
VERTICAL CIRCULATION
UTILITIES
PARKING GARAGE
UPDN UP DNGREEN ROOF
GREEN ROOF BELOW
ELEV. OVER.
SKYLIGHT
1 BR (B1)
1 BR (A)
1 BR (A)
1 BR (A)
1 BR (D) 1 BR (A1) 1 BR (A) 1 BR (A) STUDIO (G)
1 BR (H) - ADA
1 BR (A)
1 BR (A)
1 BR (F) 1 BR (C)
FITNESS STUDIO
TRASH
MECH/ELEC
1 BR (A)
1 BR (A)
1 BR (B) 1 BR (B)
1 BR (A)
1 BR (A)
1 BR (B1)
ELEV LOBBY
CORRIDOR
CHESTNUT ST
AWNING BELOW
GREEN ROOF BELOW
GREEN ROOF BELOW
4254 CHESTNUT STREET | CIVIC DESIGN REVIEW : September 3, 2019
16 | PLAN : PROPOSED TYPICAL FLOOR
LEGEND
RESIDENTIAL
OFFICES
VERTICAL CIRCULATION
UTILITIES
PARKING GARAGE
UPDN UP DNGREEN ROOF
GREEN ROOF BELOW
ELEV. OVER.
SKYLIGHT
1 BR (B1)
1 BR (A)
1 BR (A)
1 BR (A)
1 BR (D) 1 BR (A1) 1 BR (A) 1 BR (A) STUDIO (G)
1 BR (H) - ADA
1 BR (A)
1 BR (A)
1 BR (F) 1 BR (C)
FITNESS STUDIO
TRASH
MECH/ELEC
1 BR (A)
1 BR (A)
1 BR (B) 1 BR (B)
1 BR (A)
1 BR (A)
1 BR (B1)
ELEV LOBBY
CORRIDOR
CHESTNUT ST
AWNING BELOW
GREEN ROOF BELOW
GREEN ROOF BELOW
DN DNUP
1 BR (B1) 1 BR (B)
1 BR (A)1 BR (A)
1 BR (A) 1 BR (A)
MECH/ELEC
TRASH
1 BR (A)
1 BR (D) 1 BR (A1) 1 BR (A) 1 BR (A) STUDIO (G)
1 BR (C)1 BR (F)
1 BR (A)
1 BR (A)
1 BR (B) 1 BR (B1)
ELEV LOBBY
ROOF DECK
STOR
DOG RUN
CHESTNUT ST
GREEN ROOF BELOW
ELEV. OVER.
AWNING BELOW
SKYLIGHT BELOW
GREEN ROOF BELOW
GREEN ROOF BELOW
AWNING ABOVE
GREEN ROOF BELOW
| 17
4254 CHESTNUT STREET | CIVIC DESIGN REVIEW : September 3, 2019
PLAN : PROPOSED 7TH FLOOR
LEGEND
RESIDENTIAL
OFFICES
VERTICAL CIRCULATION
UTILITIES
PARKING GARAGE
4254 CHESTNUT STREET | CIVIC DESIGN REVIEW : September 3, 2019
18 | EXTERIOR : NORTH BUILDING ELEVATION1 Glass + Aluminum Glazing System
Corrugated Metal Panel - Medium Gray
Aluminum Composite Panel - Pale Gray
Metal Clad Canopy
2
3
4Ground Face Block5Metal Accent Trim6
1
6
Green Roof7
3
4
22
8
Aluminum Composite Panel - Dark Gray8
| 19
4254 CHESTNUT STREET | CIVIC DESIGN REVIEW : September 3, 2019
EXTERIOR : EAST BUILDING ELEVATION1 Glass + Aluminum Glazing System
Corrugated Metal Panel - Medium Gray
Aluminum Composite Panel - Pale Gray
Metal Clad Canopy
2
3
4Ground Face Block5Metal Accent Trim - Green6
5
3
2
2
3
7 Green Roof
Aluminum Composite Panel - Dark Gray8
3
1
4
4254 CHESTNUT STREET | CIVIC DESIGN REVIEW : September 3, 2019
20 | EXTERIOR : SOUTH BUILDING ELEVATION12
3
4
5
6
5
1
3
2
5
2
2
7
8
Glass + Aluminum Glazing System
Corrugated Metal Panel - Medium Gray
Aluminum Composite Panel - Pale Gray
Metal Clad Canopy
Ground Face Block
Metal Accent Trim - Green
Green Roof
Aluminum Composite Panel - Dark Gray
| 21
4254 CHESTNUT STREET | CIVIC DESIGN REVIEW : September 3, 2019
EXTERIOR : WEST BUILDING ELEVATION12
3
4
5
6
5
3
2
2
5
3
7
1
6
7
8
Glass + Aluminum Glazing System
Corrugated Metal Panel - Medium Gray
Aluminum Composite Panel - Pale Gray
Metal Clad Canopy
Ground Face Block
Metal Accent Trim - Green
Green Roof
Aluminum Composite Panel - Dark Gray
GREEN ROOF
GREEN ROOFLOW
GREEN ROOFLOW
SKYLIGHT
ROOF DECK
4254 CHESTNUT STREET | CIVIC DESIGN REVIEW : September 3, 2019
22 | PLAN : PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLAN
| 23
4254 CHESTNUT STREET | CIVIC DESIGN REVIEW : September 3, 2019
EXTERIOR : MATERIALS
The proposed building materials and design embody a palette of playful and compelling products, patterns, and textures that formally define the difference uses of the building while maintaining an overall cohesive aesthetic.
The ground floor offices feature storefront with a blend of transparent, translucent, and opaque glazing as well as articulated metal work and colored frames.
The residential floor finishes are designed to provide interest with varied staggered joint patterns and openings. Additionally, layering of the materials creates shadow and depth to the facade and builds character and complexity for the project.
The exterior materials include: articulated metalwork and frames, anodized aluminum storefront and glazing system, corrugated metal cladding and ground face block.
MATERIALS:
4254 CHESTNUT STREET | CIVIC DESIGN REVIEW : September 3, 2019
24 | SITE SECTION : EAST - WEST1 Parking garage
Commercial Offices
Residental Units
2
3Green Roof4Vertical Circulation5Roof Deck6
6
3
2
1
44
4
3
4
4
| 25
4254 CHESTNUT STREET | CIVIC DESIGN REVIEW : September 3, 2019
SITE SECTION : NORTH - SOUTH1 Parking garage
Commercial Offices
Residental Units
2
3Green Roof4Vertical Circulation5
1
4
3
2
5
4
4
4254 CHESTNUT STREET | CIVIC DESIGN REVIEW : September 3, 2019
26 |
| 27
4254 CHESTNUT STREET | CIVIC DESIGN REVIEW : September 3, 2019
EXTERIOR : NE CORNER PERSPECTIVE @ CHESTNUT ST
4254 CHESTNUT STREET | CIVIC DESIGN REVIEW : September 3, 2019
28 | EXTERIOR : NW CORNER PERSPECTIVE @ CHESTNUT ST
| 29
4254 CHESTNUT STREET | CIVIC DESIGN REVIEW : September 3, 2019
EXTERIOR : PERSPECTIVE ALONG CHESTNUT ST ENTRANCE
4254 CHESTNUT STREET | CIVIC DESIGN REVIEW : September 3, 2019
30 | PERSPECTIVE : PROPOSED MASSING AERIAL VIEW
| 31
4254 CHESTNUT STREET | CIVIC DESIGN REVIEW : September 3, 2019
PERSPECTIVE : PROPOSED MASSING AERIAL VIEW
CDR PROJECT APPLICATION FORM Note: For a project appl icat ion t o be cons idered for a Civic Des ign Review agenda, complete and accurate submitta ls must be received no later than 4 P.M. on the submiss ion date. A submission does not guarantee p lacement on the agenda of the next CDR meet ing date.
L&I APPLICATION NUMBER:
What is the trigger causing the project to require CDR Review? Explain briefly.
PROJECT LOCATION
CONTACT INFORMATION
Planning District: Council District:
Address:
Is this parcel within a Master Plan District? Yes No
Applicant Name: Primary Phone:
Email: Address:
Property Owner: Developer
Architect:
The project creates more than 100,000 sq. ft. of new gross floor area and more than 100dwelling units.
4240 Chestnut StreetPhiladelphia PA 19104
X
3University Southwest
215 751 9008
1628 JFK Blvd. Suite 1300Philadelphia PA 19103
4240 Chestnut St CRCP llc4240 Chestnut St CRCP llc
Jay Rockafellow
DAS Architects
SITE CONDITIONS
SITE USES
COMMUNITY MEETING
ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT HEARING
Community meeting held: Yes No
If yes, please provide written documentation as proof.
If no, indicate the date and time the community meeting will be held:
Date: Time:
Present Use:
Proposed Use:
Area of Proposed Uses, Broken Out by Program (Include Square Footage and # of Units):
Proposed # of Parking Units:
Site Area: Existing Zoning: Are Zoning Variances required? Yes No
ZBA hearing scheduled: Yes No NA______
If yes, indicate the date hearing will be held:
Date:
X
Offices, parking Lot,
CMX-4
X
Office: 35,415 sfResidential: 76,209 sf
22,991 sf
40 spaces
X
TBD
4254 CHESTNUT STREET | CIVIC DESIGN REVIEW : September 3, 2019
SUBJECT : DESCRIPTION (CHANGE IN SPREAD SHEET USING CNTRL+SHIFT+CLICK)32 |
Civic Design Review, Philadelphia Sustainability Questionnaire
Categories Benchmark
Meets or Exceeds the Benchmark (yes or no)?
If yes, please describe how or reference the applicable document in the CDR
submission.
Location and Transportation
Access to Quality Transit
Locate a functional entry of the project within a ¼-mile (400-meter) walking distance of existing or planned bus, streetcar, or rideshare stops, bus rapid transit stops, light or heavy rail stations.
Reduced Parking Footprint
All new parking areas to be located in the rear yard of the property or under the building, and unenclosed or uncovered parking areas are 40% or less of the site area.
Green Vehicles
Designate 5% of all parking spaces used by the project as preferred parking for green vehicles or car share vehicles. Clearly identify and enforce for sole use by car share or green vehicles, which include plug-in electric vehicles and alternative fuel vehicles.
Bike Share StationIncorporate a bike share station in coordination with and conformance to the standards of Philadelphia Bike Share.
Sustainable Sites
Pervious Site Surfaces
Provides vegetated and/or pervious open space that is 30% or greater of the site's Open Area, as defined by the zoning code. Vegetated and/or green roofs can be included in this calculation.
Rainwater Management
Conform to the stormwater requirements of the Philadelphia Water Department(PWD) and either: A)Develop a green street and donate it to PWD, designed and constructed in accordance with the PWD Green Streets Design Manual, OR B) Manage additional runoff from adjacent streets on the development site, designed and constructed in accordance with specifications the PWD Stormwater Management Regulations
Heat Island Reduction (excluding roofs)
Reduce the heat island effect through either of the following strategies for 50% or more of all on-site hardscapes: A) Hardscapes that have a high reflectance, an SRI>29. B) Shading by trees, structures, or solar panels.
Philadelphia City Planning Commission
. Septa b es & on, & 43rd on .
Lucy Shuttles stops at Chestnut and Walnut Sts along 40th St.
Yes. (2) electric charging stations will be provided.
T
canopy structure covering the hardscape of the garage ramp and
Civic Design Review, Philadelphia Sustainability Questionnaire
Categories Benchmark
Meets or Exceeds the Benchmark (yes or no)?
If yes, please describe how or reference the applicable document in the CDR
submission.
Water Efficiency
Outdoor Water Use
Maintain on-site vegetation without irrigation. OR, reduce the watering requirements to at least 50% from the calculated baseline for the site's peak watering month.
Energy and Atmosphere
Energy Commissioning
Acquire a separate, independent commissioning service to insure that the energy related systems are installed, calibrated, and perform as intended.
Energy Performance
The project will reduce energy consumption by: Achieving 10% energy saving or more from an established baseline using ASHRAE standard 90.1-2010, OR by conforming to ASHRAE Advanced Energy Design Guide for Commercial Buildings.
On-Site Renewable Energy
Produce renewable energy on-site that will provide at least 3% of the project's anticipated energy usage.
Innovation
InnovationAny other sustainable measures that could positively impact the public realm.
Philadelphia City Planning Commission
Yes. This project will meet the requirements set forth by the code.
is
SUBJECT : DESCRIPTION (CHANGE IN SPREAD SHEET USING CNTRL+SHIFT+CLICK) | 33
4254 CHESTNUT STREET | CIVIC DESIGN REVIEW : September 3, 2019
SUSTAINABILITY QUESTIONNAIRE
COMPLETE STREETS HANDBOOK CHECKLIST Philadelphia City Planning Commission
1
INSTRUCTIONS This Checklist is an implementation tool of the Philadelphia Complete Streets Handbook (the “Handbook”) and enables City engineers and planners to review projects for their compliance with the Handbook’s policies. The handbook provides design guidance and does not supersede or replace language, standards or policies established in the City Code, City Plan, or Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD).
The Philadelphia City Planning Commission receives this Checklist as a function of its Civic Design Review (CDR) process. This checklist is used to document how project applicants considered and accommodated the needs of all users of city streets and sidewalks during the planning and/or design of projects affecting public rights-of-way. Departmental reviewers will use this checklist to confirm that submitted designs incorporate complete streets considerations (see §11-901 of The Philadelphia Code). Applicants for projects that require Civic Design Review shall complete this checklist and attach it to plans submitted to the Philadelphia City Planning Commission for review, along with an electronic version.
The Handbook and the checklist can be accessed at http://www.phila.gov/CityPlanning/projectreviews/Pages/CivicDesignReview.aspx
PRELIMINARY PCPC REVIEW AND COMMENT:
DATE
FINAL STREETS DEPT REVIEW AND COMMENT:
DATE
COMPLETE STREETS HANDBOOK CHECKLIST Philadelphia City Planning Commission
2
INSTRUCTIONS (continued) APPLICANTS SHOULD MAKE SURE TO COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS:
This checklist is designed to be filled out electronically in Microsoft Word format. Please submit the Word version of the checklist. Text fields will expand automatically as you type.
All plans submitted for review must clearly dimension the widths of the Furnishing, Walking, and Building Zones (as defined in Section 1 of the Handbook). “High Priority” Complete Streets treatments (identified in Table 1 and subsequent sections of the Handbook) should be identified and dimensioned on plans.
All plans submitted for review must clearly identify and site all street furniture, including but not limited to bus shelters, street signs and hydrants.
Any project that calls for the development and installation of medians, bio-swales and other such features in the right-of-way may require a maintenance agreement with the Streets Department.
ADA curb-ramp designs must be submitted to Streets Department for review
Any project that significantly changes the curb line may require a City Plan Action. The City Plan Action Application is available at http://www.philadelphiastreets.com/survey-and-design-bureau/city-plans-unit . An application to the Streets Department for a City Plan Action is required when a project plan proposes the:
o Placing of a new street; o Removal of an existing street; o Changes to roadway grades, curb lines, or widths; or o Placing or striking a city utility right-of-way.
Complete Streets Review Submission Requirement*: • EXISTING CONDITIONS SITE PLAN, should be at an identified standard engineering scale
o FULLY DIMENSIONED o CURB CUTS/DRIVEWAYS/LAYBY LANES o TREE PITS/LANDSCAPING o BICYCLE RACKS/STATIONS/STORAGE AREAS o TRANSIT SHELTERS/STAIRWAYS
• PROPOSED CONDITIONS SITE PLAN, should be at an identified standard engineering scale o FULLY DIMENSIONED, INCLUDING DELINEATION OF WALKING, FURNISHING, AND BUILDING ZONES AND
PINCH POINTS o PROPOSED CURB CUTS/DRIVEWAYS/LAYBY LANES o PROPOSED TREE PITS/LANDSCAPING o BICYCLE RACKS/STATIONS/STORAGE AREAS o TRANSIT SHELTERS/STAIRWAYS
*APPLICANTS PLEASE NOTE: ONLY FULL-SIZE, READABLE SITE PLANS WILL BE ACCEPTED. ADDITIONAL PLANS MAY BE REQUIRED AND WILL BE REQUESTED IF NECESSARY
4254 CHESTNUT STREET | CIVIC DESIGN REVIEW : September 3, 2019
34 |
COMPLETE STREETS HANDBOOK CHECKLIST Philadelphia City Planning Commission
3
GENERAL PROJECT INFORMATION 1. PROJECT NAME
4240 Chestnut Street, Philadelphia PA 19104 2. DATE
08/16/2019 3. APPLICANT NAME
Jay Rockafellow 4. APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION
Jay Rockafellow, Architect 1628 John F. Kennedy Blvd, Suite 1300 Philadelphia, PA 19102 215-751-9008 [email protected]
5. PROJECT AREA: list precise street limits and scope The project site is bounded by Chestnut Street. The project is mixed-use building 35,459 SF office use and 102 residential units with on-site parking garage (40 spaces) and related site improvements.
6. OWNER NAME Chris Rahn
7. OWNER CONTACT INFORMATION 1601 Third Avenue, 33A New York, NY 10128
8. ENGINEER / ARCHITECT NAME Jay Rockafellow, Architect
9. ENGINEER / ARCHITECT CONTACT INFORMATION Jay Rockafellow, Architect 1628 John F. Kennedy Blvd, Suite 1300 Philadelphia, PA 19102 215-751-9008 [email protected]
10. STREETS: List the streets associated with the project. Complete Streets Types can be found at www.phila.gov/map under the “Complete Street Types” field. Complete Streets Types are also identified in Section 3 of the Handbook. Also available here: http://metadata.phila.gov/#home/datasetdetails/5543867320583086178c4f34/
STREET FROM TO COMPLETE STREET TYPE Chestnut St 42nd St 43rd St Urban Arterial Samson St 42nd St 43rd St Local
11. Does the Existing Conditions site survey clearly identify the following existing conditions with dimensions? a. Parking and loading regulations in curb lanes adjacent to the site YES NO b. Street Furniture such as bus shelters, honor boxes, etc. YES NO N/A c. Street Direction YES NO d. Curb Cuts YES NO N/A e. Utilities, including tree grates, vault covers, manholes, junction YES NO N/A
COMPLETE STREETS HANDBOOK CHECKLIST Philadelphia City Planning Commission
4
boxes, signs, lights, poles, etc. f. Building Extensions into the sidewalk, such as stairs and stoops YES NO N/A
APPLICANT: General Project Information Additional Explanation / Comments:
DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: General Project Information
| 35
4254 CHESTNUT STREET | CIVIC DESIGN REVIEW : September 3, 2019
COMPLETE STREETS HANDBOOK CHECKLIST Philadelphia City Planning Commission
5
PEDESTRIAN COMPONENT (Handbook Section 4.3) 12. SIDEWALK: list Sidewalk widths for each street frontage. Required Sidewalk widths are listed in Section 4.3 of the
Handbook. STREET FRONTAGE TYPICAL SIDEWALK WIDTH
(BUILDING LINE TO CURB) Required / Existing / Proposed
CITY PLAN SIDEWALK WIDTH Existing / Proposed
Chestnut St 12’ / 18.07’ / 18.07’ 18.07’ / 18.07’ Samson St 10’ / 12.06’ / N/A 12.06’ / N/A
13. WALKING ZONE: list Walking Zone widths for each street frontage. The Walking Zone is defined in Section 4.3 of the Handbook, including required widths.
STREET FRONTAGE WALKING ZONE Required / Existing / Proposed
Chestnut St 6’ / 7.85’ / 13.4’ Samson St 5’ / 8.56’/ N/A
14. VEHICULAR INTRUSIONS: list Vehicular Intrusions into the sidewalk. Examples include but are not limited to; driveways, lay-by lanes, etc. Driveways and lay-by lanes are addressed in sections 4.8.1 and 4.6.3, respectively, of the Handbook. EXISTING VEHICULAR INTRUSIONS
INTRUSION TYPE INTRUSION WIDTH PLACEMENT Driveway 23.93’ Chestnut St Driveway 15.39’ Samson St
PROPOSED VEHICULAR INTRUSIONS INTRUSION TYPE INTRUSION WIDTH PLACEMENT Driveway 23’ Chestnut St
COMPLETE STREETS HANDBOOK CHECKLIST Philadelphia City Planning Commission
6
PEDESTRIAN COMPONENT (continued) DEPARTMENTAL
APPROVAL
15. When considering the overall design, does it create or enhance a pedestrian environment that provides safe and comfortable access for all pedestrians at all times of the day?
YES NO YES NO
APPLICANT: Pedestrian Component Additional Explanation / Comments:
DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: Pedestrian Component Reviewer Comments:
4254 CHESTNUT STREET | CIVIC DESIGN REVIEW : September 3, 2019
36 |
COMPLETE STREETS HANDBOOK CHECKLIST Philadelphia City Planning Commission
7
BUILDING & FURNISHING COMPONENT (Handbook Section 4.4) 16. BUILDING ZONE: list the MAXIMUM, existing and proposed Building Zone width on each street frontage. The Building
Zone is defined as the area of the sidewalk immediately adjacent to the building face, wall, or fence marking the property line, or a lawn in lower density residential neighborhoods. The Building Zone is further defined in section 4.4.1 of the Handbook.
STREET FRONTAGE MAXIMUM BUILDING ZONE WIDTH Existing / Proposed
Chestnut St 0’ / 0’ Samson St 0’ /N/A
17. FURNISHING ZONE: list the MINIMUM, recommended, existing, and proposed Furnishing Zone widths on each street frontage. The Furnishing Zone is further defined in section 4.4.2 of the Handbook.
STREET FRONTAGE MINIMUM FURNISHING ZONE WIDTH Recommended / Existing / Proposed
Chestnut St 4’ / 4’ / 4.67’ Samson St 3.5’ / 3.5’ / N/a
18. Identify proposed “high priority” building and furnishing zone design treatments that are incorporated into the design plan, where width permits (see Handbook Table 1). Are the following treatments identified and dimensioned on the plan?
DEPARTMENTAL APPROVAL
▪ Bicycle Parking YES NO N/A YES NO ▪ Lighting YES NO N/A YES NO ▪ Benches YES NO N/A YES NO ▪ Street Trees YES NO N/A YES NO ▪ Street Furniture YES NO N/A YES NO
19. Does the design avoid tripping hazards? YES NO N/A YES NO
20. Does the design avoid pinch points? Pinch points are locations where the Walking Zone width is less than the required width identified in item 13, or requires an exception
YES NO N/A YES NO
COMPLETE STREETS HANDBOOK CHECKLIST Philadelphia City Planning Commission
8
BUILDING & FURNISHING COMPONENT (continued)
APPLICANT: Building & Furnishing Component Additional Explanation / Comments:
DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: Building & Furnishing Component Reviewer Comments:
21. Do street trees and/or plants comply with street installation requirements (see sections 4.4.7 & 4.4.8)
YES NO N/A YES NO
22. Does the design maintain adequate visibility for all roadway users at intersections?
YES NO N/A YES NO
| 37
4254 CHESTNUT STREET | CIVIC DESIGN REVIEW : September 3, 2019
COMPLETE STREETS HANDBOOK CHECKLIST Philadelphia City Planning Commission
9
BICYCLE COMPONENT (Handbook Section 4.5) 23. List elements of the project that incorporate recommendations of the Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan, located online at
http://phila2035.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/bikePedfinal2.pdf Provide sidewalk widths to meet the minimum recommendations. Update the corner pedestrian curb ramps. Provide street trees along the sidewalk. Limiting the proposed curb cuts for the residential project. Provide for off street bicycle parking.
24. List the existing and proposed number of bicycle parking spaces, on- and off-street. Bicycle parking requirements are provided in The Philadelphia Code, Section 14-804.
BUILDING / ADDRESS REQUIRED SPACES
ON-STREET Existing / Proposed
ON SIDEWALK Existing / Proposed
OFF-STREET Existing / Proposed
4240 Chestnut Street 38 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 38 / / / / / / / / /
25. Identify proposed “high priority” bicycle design treatments (see Handbook Table 1) that are
incorporated into the design plan, where width permits. Are the following “High Priority” elements identified and dimensioned on the plan?
DEPARTMENTAL APPROVAL
▪ Conventional Bike Lane YES NO N/A YES NO ▪ Buffered Bike Lane YES NO N/A YES NO ▪ Bicycle-Friendly Street ▪ Indego Bicycle Share Station
YES NO N/A YES NO N/A
YES NO YES NO
26. Does the design provide bicycle connections to local bicycle, trail, and transit networks?
YES NO N/A YES NO
27. Does the design provide convenient bicycle connections to residences, work places, and other destinations?
YES NO N/A YES NO
APPLICANT: Bicycle Component Additional Explanation / Comments:
DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: Bicycle Component Reviewer Comments:
COMPLETE STREETS HANDBOOK CHECKLIST Philadelphia City Planning Commission
10
CURBSIDE MANAGEMENT COMPONENT (Handbook Section 4.6) DEPARTMENTAL
APPROVAL
28. Does the design limit conflict among transportation modes along the curb?
YES NO YES NO
29. Does the design connect transit stops to the surrounding pedestrian network and destinations?
YES NO N/A YES NO
30. Does the design provide a buffer between the roadway and pedestrian traffic?
YES NO N/A YES NO
31. How does the proposed plan affect the accessibility, visibility, connectivity, and/or attractiveness of public transit? Sidewalk and corner accessible ramp reconstruction is proposed for this project to provide pedestrian connectivity.
YES NO
APPLICANT: Curbside Management Component Additional Explanation / Comments:
DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: Curbside Management Component Reviewer Comments:
4254 CHESTNUT STREET | CIVIC DESIGN REVIEW : September 3, 2019
38 |
COMPLETE STREETS HANDBOOK CHECKLIST Philadelphia City Planning Commission
11
VEHICLE / CARTWAY COMPONENT (Handbook Section 4.7) 32. If lane changes are proposed, , identify existing and proposed lane widths and the design speed for each street
frontage; STREET FROM TO LANE WIDTHS
Existing / Proposed DESIGN SPEED
/ / / /
DEPARTMENTAL
APPROVAL
33. What is the maximum AASHTO design vehicle being accommodated by the design?
Passenger YES NO
34. Will the project affect a historically certified street? An inventory of historic streets(1) is maintained by the Philadelphia Historical Commission.
YES NO YES NO
35. Will the public right-of-way be used for loading and unloading activities?
YES NO YES NO
36. Does the design maintain emergency vehicle access? YES NO YES NO
37. Where new streets are being developed, does the design connect and extend the street grid?
YES NO N/A YES NO
38. Does the design support multiple alternative routes to and from destinations as well as within the site?
YES NO N/A YES NO
39. Overall, does the design balance vehicle mobility with the mobility and access of all other roadway users?
YES NO YES NO
APPLICANT: Vehicle / Cartway Component Additional Explanation / Comments: No lane changes are proposed.
DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: Vehicle / Cartway Component Reviewer Comments:
(1) http://www.philadelphiastreets.com/images/uploads/documents/Historical_Street_Paving.pdf
COMPLETE STREETS HANDBOOK CHECKLIST Philadelphia City Planning Commission
12
URBAN DESIGN COMPONENT (Handbook Section 4.8) DEPARTMENTAL
APPROVAL
40. Does the design incorporate windows, storefronts, and other active uses facing the street?
YES NO N/A YES NO
41. Does the design provide driveway access that safely manages pedestrian / bicycle conflicts with vehicles (see Section 4.8.1)?
YES NO N/A YES NO
42. Does the design provide direct, safe, and accessible connections between transit stops/stations and building access points and destinations within the site?
YES NO N/A YES NO
APPLICANT: Urban Design Component Additional Explanation / Comments:
DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: Urban Design Component Reviewer Comments:
| 39
4254 CHESTNUT STREET | CIVIC DESIGN REVIEW : September 3, 2019
COMPLETE STREETS HANDBOOK CHECKLIST Philadelphia City Planning Commission
13
INTERSECTIONS & CROSSINGS COMPONENT (Handbook Section 4.9) 43. If signal cycle changes are proposed, please identify Existing and Proposed Signal Cycle lengths; if not, go to question
No. 48. SIGNAL LOCATION EXISTING
CYCLE LENGTH PROPOSED CYCLE LENGTH
DEPARTMENTAL
APPROVAL
44. Does the design minimize the signal cycle length to reduce pedestrian wait time?
YES NO N/A YES NO
45. Does the design provide adequate clearance time for pedestrians to cross streets?
YES NO N/A YES NO
46. Does the design minimize pedestrian crossing distances by narrowing streets or travel lanes, extending curbs, reducing curb radii, or using medians or refuge islands to break up long crossings? If yes, City Plan Action may be required.
YES NO N/A YES NO
47. Identify “High Priority” intersection and crossing design treatments (see Handbook Table 1) that will be incorporated into the design, where width permits. Are the following “High Priority” design treatments identified and dimensioned on the plan?
YES NO
▪ Marked Crosswalks YES NO N/A YES NO ▪ Pedestrian Refuge Islands YES NO N/A YES NO ▪ Signal Timing and Operation YES NO N/A YES NO ▪ Bike Boxes YES NO N/A YES NO
48. Does the design reduce vehicle speeds and increase visibility for all modes at intersections?
YES NO N/A YES NO
49. Overall, do intersection designs limit conflicts between all modes and promote pedestrian and bicycle safety?
YES NO N/A YES NO
APPLICANT: Intersections & Crossings Component Additional Explanation / Comments:
DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: Intersections & Crossings Component Reviewer Comments:
COMPLETE STREETS HANDBOOK CHECKLIST Philadelphia City Planning Commission
14
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS
APPLICANT Additional Explanation / Comments:
DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW Additional Reviewer Comments:
4254 CHESTNUT STREET | CIVIC DESIGN REVIEW : September 3, 2019
40 |
WE CREATE EXPERIENCES.™RETAIL : HOSPITALITY : RESIDENTIAL
DAS ARCHITECTS INC.1628 JOHN F KENNEDY BLVD., SUITE 1300
PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103(T) 215.751.9008 (F) 215.751.9118
www.dasarchitects.com