4B06 Nguyen Thi Khoa Polite Strategies in English and Vietnamese Imperatives

8/2/2019 4B06 Nguyen Thi Khoa Polite Strategies in English and Vietnamese Imperatives

1/23

POLITE STRATEGIES IN ENGLISH AND VIETNAMESE IMPERATIVES 1

Polite Strategies in English and Vietnamese Imperatives: A Contrastive Analysis

Nguyn Th Khoa

HCMC University of Pedagogy


2/23


Introduction

As we all know, the most basic function of language is to communicate. In the relationship of

language and other factors such as contexts and communicative objects, politeness factor of language is

concerned. So, this essay will give you some ideas about the definition of imperative, definition of

politeness and some strategies to make polite imperative in English and Vietnamese.


3/23


Definition of imperative

Using the same utterance, but in different contexts, we will understand it in many different ways.

For example, the utterance Its so cold (Tri lnh qu.) can be understood as:

(1) Close the door. (ng ca li i.)

(2) Turn on the heater. (M l si ln.)

(3) Take the sweater for me, please. (Lm n ly gim ti ci o m.)

Or with the same intention, we can use different ways to ask people to do it. For instance, if you

want others to close the windows, here are the sentences you can use:

(4) Its so cold.

(5) Close the windows.

(6) Would you mind closing the windows?

So, in his book Dng hc Vit ng, Nguyn Thin Gip (2000) defines imperative as an act

which speakers use to make receivers do something. This act can be expressed in sentences, due to which

the speakers can make the receivers do something.

Imperatives can be used for many functions such as:

Telling people what to do.

Giving instructions and advice.

Making recommendations and suggestions.


4/23


Making offers.

Definition of politeness

There is a variety of definition for politeness, however, most of them approach the angle of social

appropriateness. In Longman dictionary of contemporary English, politeness is defined as having or

showing good manners, consideration for others, and/or correct social behavior. For Lakoff (1975) to

be polite is saying the socially correct thing (p. 53) while for Adegbija (1989) politeness is associated

with situations in which one speaks or behaves in a way that is socially and culturally acceptable and

pleasant to the hearer (p. 58).

From these definitions, Lakoff (1973) approaches three maxims of politeness:

Dont impose

Give options

Make your receiver feel good.

Face and politeness

In daily conversation, face plays a very important role. In their book Politeness (1987), Brown

and Levinson state that politeness is based on the notion of positive face and negative face: positive face

refers to a persons need to be accepted, or liked, by others, and to be treated as a member of a group

knowing that their wants are shared by others; negative face refers to a persons need to be independent

and not to be imposed on by others.

In Vietnamese, saving face is also significant. We can hear sentences like N mt anh,

ng lm mt th din ca ti y So, according to L Th Kim nh (2006), face and saving face

are important concepts relating to politeness principle and are the main motives for human beings to

behave politely while anticipating in communication process (p.18).


5/23


Politeness and culture

As Adegbija (1989) defines politeness above, one wants to be polite must speaks or behaves in a

way that is socially and culturally acceptable and pleasant to the hearer. That point shows that politeness

and culture have a very close relationship to each other. Different cultures will have different principles of

politeness. One action considered to be polite in this country may be assumed impolite in another. For

example, interruption while making conversation is considered appropriate in America but in Vietnam, it

is impolite to do so. Vietnamese people always wait for their turn to talk. Or, in the case of personal

pronoun, the American only use you for the addressees whereas the Vietnamese have a lot of choices

such as anh, ch, em, cu, ch, . So, we can see the influence of culture on language here: while

Americans give prominence to equality in communication, Vietnamese people give prominence to

hierarchy in family and society, therefore using the wrong personal pronoun in Vietnamese is considered

to be impolite.

Another point is that the ideas of politeness change all the time. Which seemed to be impolite in

the past can be polite at the present and vice versa. For instance, my tao was only used by noblemen,

officers or landlords to people belonging to low social class. Using my tao between friends would beconsidered inappropriate. However, nowadays, my tao can be used commonly to show intimacy

between people having the same status. So, this essay will only talk about polite strategies appropriate in

modern society.

Politeness in imperatives

As mentioned above, politeness is very important, especially in imperatives, which, if using

inappropriately, will cause the losing face of receiver or even the speaker if the action cannot be done.

However, Leechs idea that the act of command is impolite because of its imposition while

complimentary is polite is not true because politeness is controlled by other factors such as:


6/23


Power distance

Principle

Hierarchy

Age

Relationship

So, if the speaker is at higher position than the receiver, the imperative may not be concerned

impolite. Or, commands which are allowed in some situations by specific social institution are considered

to be polite. For example, when the King gives order to his people, it is never impolite. Nevertheless,

giving complimentary untimely will be impolite (L, 2006).

Leech (1983) proposes a politeness principle which is based on the concept of benefit and cost

between speakers and receivers. It is described as a set of maxim:

Maxim of tact

Maxim of generosity

Maxim of approbation

Maxim of modesty

Maxim of agreement

Maxim of sympathy

Comparision of English and Vietnamse imperatives:

Influencing factors:


7/23


We used to think that Vietnamese culture is collectivism, so Vietnamese imperatives will be

influenced by factors such as distance of power, principle, hierarchy, age, relationship, etc more than an

individualistic culture like English. However, English is also influenced by such those factors, though the

degree may be less than Vietnamese. We can see that people who are superior, older or having close

relationship with the receivers will tend to use more imperatives. For example, adults do not usually give

orders to each others, unless they are in a position of authority, like between boss and employees.

However, they can give orders to children and animals that are inferior to them. Moreover, the factors

mentioned above can influence the degree of politeness in imperatives. If the speakers are less powerful,

younger and do not have a very close relationship with the receivers, the imperatives they use are

assumed to be in polite forms, whereas to superior people, it is not a must.

Form of imperative:

The imperatives can take the form of affirmative, negative and interrogative. In English,

imperatives can also take the form of tag-question

English VietnameseAffirmative Come here! Li y!Negative Dont go! ng i!Interrogative Would you mind opening the window? Bn m ca s gim mnh nh?Tag-question Close the door, would you?

In the general view, imperatives in English and Vietnamese are nearly the same in some points.

The most common feature of their imperatives is that, they usually lack subject. In that case, subject will

be understood as you

(7) Go! (I want you to go)

(8) i i! (Bn/con/my i i)


8/23


However, when we want to make clear who we are talking to, noun/ pronoun can be used to

clarify the addressee:

(9) Mary, play on my side.

(10) Anh ng bao gi n y na.

In the case of formation, an imperative can consist of Verb + Object + Adjunct or simply just a

Verb

(11) Put the gun on the floor.

V O A

(12) Go!

V

In Vietnamese, imperatives can somehow be analyzed like this:

(13) Dt n v i.

V O A

(14) Ct!

V

When we do not want somebody to do something, the structure Dont / Never + Vinf or No +

Gerund is used. Similar structure in Vietnamese will be ng, Cm, Khng c

(15) Dont tell them.

(17) Never talk to me like that

again.

(19) No smoking

(16) ng ni vi h.


9/23


(18)ng c bao gi ni

chuyn vi m kiu na nghe

cha.

(20) Cm ht thuc.

From the examples above, we can see that both imperatives in English and Vietnamese can be

direct ((7) (20)) or indirect ((1) (3)). In (1) (3), the speaker does not mention what he/ she wants the

receiver to do specifically but the receiver still can get the point due to the context. So, whatever kind of

imperative is direct or indirect, the speech act is also successful.

However, there is one form that is just used in English imperatives and cannot be seen in

Vietnamese: passive, which usually takes the form of Get + Vpp. For example, Get washed! is anpassive imperative which can mean Take a bath!. Nevertheless, we do not have any utterances like B

tm i / c tm i. In spite of that, i tm i. is used.

Polite strategies

Vietnamese imperative:

In Vietnamese, pronouns are very important when making conversation. Using appropriate

pronouns when giving imperative will make it more polite, acceptable and vice versa, using wrong

pronouns will be assumed impolite. Therefore, knowing how to use pronouns is extremely necessary

when speaking Vietnamese.

One of the strategies is using plural pronouns we (chng ti, chng ta) instead of singular

pronoun. An imperative including the speaker will make it more acceptable to the receiver because he/she

is not imposed to do it alone. For example, saying Chng ta (we) i ti cy i will be more polite than

saying Cu (you) i ti cy i.

Furthermore, address pronouns need to be paid attention. Address pronouns in Vietnamese can

show the relationship between speakers and receivers. So, using them successfully when making


10/23


imperatives will create the close, intimate relationship with receivers and therefore, can reduce the

imposition of imperatives. There are many ways of using address pronouns:

Firstly, using pronouns that show relative relationship. In Vietnamese, ng, b, cha, m, c, ch,

bc, d, chu are used for people having blood relationship with each other. However, in reality, those

pronouns are also used between strangers to be more intimate.

Ex: A young girl may speak to an old woman like this:

(21) D cho con ly nc ma.

(22) Con i t, d em ra ngay.

In the example above, the young girl and the old woman are completely strangers but the

pronouns they use - d-con - erase the distance between them and the imperative, therefore, becomes

polite.

In Vietnamese culture, address pronouns must go with each other as pairs such as ng

con/chu, bc chu, anh/ch em, d/c chu, etc. Changing pronouns in each pair may lead to the

change in degree of politeness. For example, when comparing Anh a gim em quyn sch and Anh

a gim ti quyn sch, Vietnamese people will easily realize that the second imperative is not as

polite as the first one.

Secondly, use titles when addressing receivers. Vietnamese people are always proud of their titles

which show their positions in society, so, mentioning their titles when making imperatives is a way of

honoring them and making them feel good.

(23)Xin gio scho bit kin v vic ny .

(24)Em xin th trng cho php em ngh sng mai, em c vic bn .


11/23


In these two sentences, gio s (professor), th trng (chief officer) are the titles of receivers

and they make them pleased when being addressed so. However, because titles are so polite, they are only

used in formal conversations.

Thirdly, proper names are also used to increase politeness. Proper names are used not only in

family but also in society. Proper names are only used by superiors to address their inferiors. However,

the inferiors can sometimes use proper names for their superiors, but this case is only accepted when they

add pronouns which show relationship before the proper name, as in (25):

(25)Chiu nay ba Minh ch con qua nh ni chi nha ba.

(26)Hng ly gim mnh ci qut.

(27)Thng cho Hoa mn cy bt nha. Bt ca Hoa ht mc ri.

Another strategy is to use extension elements. Extension elements are the elements going along

with the core of the imperative without showing any imperative content (L, 2006). Though some of them

can emphasize the act of imperatives, most of them can soften the imperatives. There are many kinds of

extension elements. Firstly, they can be the words used to draw attention or to address the receivers.

These words usually stand at the beginning of the sentences.

(28)M i, ly gim con cy vit.

(29)Ny, cu ly gim t cy inh.

(30), mai i mua sch v vi tao nha.

In the three examples above, the speakers can draw attention of the receivers. In (28), m i

gives the relationship between them so that it shows the intimacy and reduce the threat of losing face

caused by imperative. In example (29), and (30), ny, are used informally between people having the


12/23


same age, the same status. So, they also express intimate relationship, reducing the imposition and

increasing politeness.

Secondly, the extension elements can make imperatives more polite by taking all verbal

precautions or by compensating. By taking all verbal precautions, the speakers will give reasons, show

hesitation or remind previous information to gain the receivers sympathy and so that the imperatives will

be easily accepted.

(31)Ch ch em ra trm xe but nha, xe em b h ri.

(32) C l chng ta phi v nh thi.

(33)Anh c bo khi no ln thnh ph th c n ch anh, hm nay em n xin anh

nh nh anh vi ba.

Compensation reduces the cost caused by imperatives on the receivers. Compensation can be

given by apologies (usually at the beginning of the sentence), promises or complimentaries so that

receivers will feel comfortable and the imperative therefore will be polite.

(34)Xin li lm phin anh ch, nhng anh ch c th cho em vay t tin c khng ?

(35)Xin thy cho php em c ngh hc hm nay, em ha s chp bi, hc bi y .

(36)Ch c anh mi gip c em thi, xin anh hy ni cho v em hiu i .

Thirdly, extension elements can be words that supplement imperative verbs to make imperatives

more polite. These verbs usually follow or precede the imperative verb/verb phrase. They can be

categorized in these groups:

Na, phi, c, hy, etc.: reduce the shyness of receivers when the imperatives

cause the cost on the speakers.


13/23


(37)C hy n bi na i .

(38)Mai nht nh cu phi gh nh t n cm .

Trn trng, knh mi, trn trng knh mi, etc.: used in formal meetings to honor

the face of receivers.

(39)Xin trn trng knh mi ng b ti d l khai trng khch sn Kim vo lc 8 gi

ngy 25 12 2009.

H, gim, cho, gip, lm n, tha thit, khn thit, etc.: reduce the imposition on

receivers. By using these words, the receivers feel that they have freedom to decide to accept or

refuse the imperatives.

(40)M ly h con ly nc.

(41)Em tha thit xin ch cho em lm vic y.

Mt cht, mt lt, tm, mt t, mt t, cht xu, etc.: these words are used to reduce

the importance of the act the speakers want the receivers to do for them and so, reduce the cost on

the receivers.

(42)Cu cho t mn tm hai trm ngn, mai t tr.

(43)B cho con xem tivi mt lt na nha.

Finally, extension elements can be words such as i, , nha, nh, thi, no, nghe, nghen, nhen,

ci, coi, vi, xem, ch, etc.. These words are used commonly in Vietnamese to establish the intimacy and

the flexibility of utterances, increasing the sympathy of receivers and making the imperatives easy to be

accepted.

(44)i em vi.


14/23


(45)Chiu nay qua nh tui chi nghen.

(46)Bn th cch ny xem.

Besides that, indirect imperatives are also very useful in increasing politeness. As we can see, we

can not say everything directly for all the time. Sometimes, the situation or the relationship does not allow

us to say directly because if we do so, it will cause the loss of face and make the imperative impolite. In

that case, we have to try to make our imperative indirectly but the receivers still get what we want them to

do. Especially, Vietnamese people prefer indirectness. So, understanding how Vietnamese people use

indirect imperatives is very important. There are lots of strategies when using indirect imperatives:

Firstly, speakers can announce their wishes or the negative of what they want, so the imperatives

will reduce its imposition and increase the receivers freedom of making decision.

(47)Ch mun em hy chm ch hc hnh.

(48)M khng thch con c chi bi lu lng nh vy na u.

Secondly, the speakers can use third personal pronoun instead of first personal pronoun. By using

this way, the speakers do not indicate it is themselves who want the action to happen and therefore can

reduce the imposition on the receivers.

Ex: Nam says to his father:

(49)- Ba i, chiu nay ba chcu Bin i n kem nha ba.

- Con mun n kem h? c ri, chiu ba ch hai anh em i.

In example (49), it can be easily recognized that Nam wants to eat ice-cream, but because he does

not dare to say so, he says that it is Bin who wants to have ice-cream.


15/23


Thirdly, the speakers can use the association between things to make indirect imperatives. This

case can be seen in example (1) (3). When the speaker says that Tri lnh qu, the receiver can

associate the coldness with the wish of the speaker: ng ca, m l si, ly o m. So, due to the

contexts, the receivers can get what the speakers want correctly, and then, they can choose whether to

accept or refuse the imperatives. Whatever they do, it also reduce the threat of losing face of the speakers

and increase the freedom of the receivers.

Fourthly, interrogative can be used to make imperatives. With this kind of imperative, the

receivers can infer what the speakers want and have freedom to decide. So, it also increases politeness.

(50)- Cu c d cy bt no khng?

- C. y, cu cm ly.

In example (50), we can see that the first speaker does not mention his/her intention of borrowing

the pen but the second still get it and gives him/her the pen. Here, the imperative is made successfully.

Furthermore, interrogative imperatives can be categorized into these subgroups:

Ending with words such as: , , , nh, nh, h, h, ch, ch, etc.: the speakers

use these words to look for the agreement and acceptance from the receivers.

(51)M ng cho con i chi m nha?

(52)Em thp n ln cho ch Lin nh? (Thch Lam)

(53)Cht na bn i vi ti ch?

Having interrogative pronouns g, lm g, ai, sao, bao nhiu, my, bao gi, u,

etc.: these words anticipate in the act of imperative, and in the same time, causing the surprise

(54), giving heartfelt advice (55) or gentle but deep criticism (56) so that the imperatives will be

more polite.


16/23


(54)Cht! Ly ng, con chu no dm th! Sao ng li ngh vn v nh vy? (Nguyn Cng

Hoan)

(55)Cu m nh vy sao khng nh?

(56)Sao anh khng v chi thn V? (Hn Mc T)

Having the word hay, hay l (or): give the receivers the freedom to choose.

(57)Hay anh li dng ba vi nh em mt hm ri hng i.

(58)Hay l mnh i xem phim i.

Having interrogative pairs such as ckhng?, c thc khng?,

cha?, xong (ri) cha?, c khng?, c cha?, c ch?,etc.: these pairs make the

imperatives polite because they reduce the imposition and increase the freedom of the receivers.

(59)ng c th cho ti xem chng minh c khng?

(60)Mnh i c cha m?

English imperatives

Because English people are highly self-respectful and highly independent, they often get angry

and feel uncomfortable when being given imperatives by other people. Therefore, using the appropriate

strategies to make imperatives more polite will reduce the tension and make them feel good.

As mentioned above, pronouns do not play an important role in English, however, plural pronoun

including speaker - we - can be used to soften the imperatives and the reason is the same as in

Vietnamese: the receivers are not imposed to do the imperatives alone. The most common form we can

see is Lets + V.inf

(61) Lets sing a song!


17/23


(62) Lets go!

Similar to Vietnamese, English also has words to draw attention before making an imperative:

excuse me, Im sorry but, pardon, hey, etc.:

(63)Excuse me, can you show me the way to the post office?

(64)Hey, dont laugh!

(65) Im sorry but you must wait for your turn, sir.

In the first and the third example, besides drawing attention, excuse me and Im sorry but

also make the receivers feel good when they add the apology together with the imperatives. In second

imperative, hey is only used between people who have close relationship or between the ones who are

at the same age, same status. So, hey will help increase the intimacy. Therefore, these words will make

the imperatives more polite.

One of the easiest and the most common way to make the imperatives polite is to use please or

in written English, you might also use Kindly + V.inf.

(66)Please take a seat.

(67)Give me the bottle, please.

(68)Kindly reply this e mail as soon as possible.

Using modal of ability (can, could, will, would, may, might, shall, should) can also make the

imperative more polite. For example, saying You should help her is more polite than Help her!

Some other examples:

(69)Could you make me some tea?


18/23


(70)Will you open the window?

(71) May I have the salt?

(72) Shall we go to the cafeteria?

Furthermore, when people want to soften the order, they usually use an introductionary phrase.

Here are some examples of introductory phrases, in order of the most indirect to the most direct:

Would you mind possibly (+V.ing)?

(73) Would you mind possibly moving your car out of my way?

I was hoping you could (+ bare inf)?

(74)I was hoping you could spare me a few minutes this morning.

Do you think you could (+bare inf)?

(75) Do you think you could do this photocopying for me?

If you have a couple of minutes spare

(76) If you have a couple of minutes spare, the office needs tidying up.

Id like you to

(77)Id like you to package these stuffs for me.

I want you to

(78) I want you to come to the airport and pick him up for me.

Similar to Vietnamese, English can use the form of question, for example, in example (69) (72),

(73), (75). However, there is one kind of question that exists in English but can not be found in


19/23


Vietnamese: tag question. Following is the table of tag question which is retrieved from website

EnglishClub:

imperative + question tagnotes:

invitation Take a seat, won't you? polite

order

Help me, can you? quite friendly

Help me, can't you? quite friendly (some irritation?)

Close the door, would you? quite polite

Do it now, will you? less polite

Don't forget, will you? with negative imperatives only willis possible

Besides that, questions with Auxiliary + S + (Verb)? are also used to make the imperatives

polite. In this case, the imperatives are indirect and therefore can reduce the imposition and increase the

freedom of the receivers.

(79)Is there any more coffee?

(80)Have you got any change?

In example (79), (80), the speakers request for coffee and money indirectly and the receivers can

decide to give them more coffee or some change. So, they are polite imperatives.

One strategy I feel the most exciting is the use of disguised imperatives in English. Because these

imperatives sound less imposing, this strategy is usually used in public places like hospitals, schools,

museums, etc. and they are usually written. Some disguised imperatives you can see:

(81)"We are a no smoking school. Your cooperation is much appreciated".

(82)"In the interest of hygiene No Dogs".


20/23


(83)"We thank you for cooperation in refraining from smoking or talking loudly during the

performance as this may offend other patrons".

Moreover, euphemisms are also used to avoid offensive overtones or refusals. Euphemisms make

the request sound milder, vague and less blunt and disagreeable (Valentina, 2003)

Ex: A notice asking for donation in York Minster says like this:

(84)We hope you are inspired by your visit to the great Cathedral. Please leave a gift if you

haven't done so already".

Implication:

From the comparison above, here are some implications in teaching and learning English and

Vietnames that I would like to propose:

Firstly, noticing the similar strategies between the two languages will help learners feel more

excited. Noone wants to study a langualy which is totally different from their mother tongue. The

similarities will reduce the giant load of knowledge they have to remember and accelerate their studying.

The similarities between English and Vietnamese can be listed as: the use of plural pronouns, some

extension elements (lm n please, c th - can, could, etc.), the use of indirect imperatives, etc.

Secondly, to deal with the differences between English and Vietnamese, sociolinguistics can help.

We should teach English learners the value of equality and teach Vietnamese learners the value of

society, family, hierrarchy and the use of personal pronouns. From these points, language learners will get

over the obstacles more easily.

Besides that, the comparison will help reduce the phenomenon of translating word by word which

usually happens to language learners. They will have to notice which form exists in both languages and

which form is not. For example, the case of Passive in English imperative does not exist in Vietnamese,

so, Vietnamese students will be easily trapped in wrong translation with b, c. Furthermore, some


21/23


people will transfer the imperative form of their language to the other unconsciously, and of course, it is

usually incorrect. For instance, a Vietnamese person may ask Cho ti hi, i sn bay Tn Sn Nht th i

ng no?. Then, the Vietnamese students may translate like this May I ask you a question, which

way to Tan Son Nhat airport?. We can see that this form does not exist in English and therefore, the

translation is wrong. However, a students who knows the English imperatives well may say Could you

tell me how to get to Tan Son Nhat airport?. Another case happens to Vietnamese learners when they

translate every word in English into Vietnamese. For example, the sentence Would you mind opening

the window? can be translated Bn c phin lng khng khi m ca s gim ti?. In fact, we hardly

see this imperative in reality. Though the word mind = phin lng, this imperative is too polite to be

used, even in formal occasion. Instead, Vietnamese people will say Bn m gim ti ci ca s vi. or

Anh vui lng m ca s gip ti., etc. Although the form is changed from interrogative into affirmative,

these sentences are the equivalents of the imperative above.

In short, the points mentioned above lead to the implication in teaching and learning English and

Vietnamese imperatives. In their book Theoretical Bases of Communicative Approaches, Canale and

Swain imply that communicative competence consists of the three components: grammatical competence,

sociolinguistic competence, and strategic competence. This essay also gave you some basic knowledge of

those three components. Therefore, a procedure of teaching and learning imperative can be used as

following:

Teach/ learn possible patterns used in imperatives.

Teach/ learn sociolinguistic competence of these patterns.

Practise these patterns in conversation, so that learners can get used to the patterns.


22/23


Conclusion

In short, imperative is used very commonly in daily life, therefore, the ability to use its polite

strategies successfully is very significant. Not all native speakers can use imperative effectively. People

who can apply these strategies cleverly will be likely to get what they want easily without causing

unpleasure to their receivers. Moreover, these strategies are not easy for foreigners to use. Native speakers

can use them unconsciously but foreigners must learn and practice a lot to use appropriately. Therefore,

the comparison of polite strategies between English and Vietnamese is very important not only to English

learners but also to Vietnamese learners. I hope that this essay can give you the information you need to

teach and learn imperatives in English and Vietnamese more effectively.


23/23


Reference list

Adegbija, E. (1989).A comparative study of politeness phenomena in Nigerian English, Yoruba and Ogori.

Multilingua, 8, 57-80.

Brown, G., Levinson, S. 1987.Politeness: Some universals in Language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge

University Press.

Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language

teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1-47.

EnglishClub. Tag question. Retrieved from http://www.englishclub.com/grammar/verbs-questions-

tag.htm

Lakoff, R. (1973). The logic of politeness, or, minding your ps and qs . Chicago Linguistic Society, 9,

292-305.

Lakoff, R. (1975).Language and womans place. New York: Harper and Row.

Lakoff, R. (1989). The limits of politeness: Therapeutic and courtroom discourse. Multilingua, 8, 101-129.

Leech, G. (1983).Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman.

L, T.K.. (2006).Lich su trong hanh ong cau khien tieng Viet. Ho chi Minh City.

Nguyen, T.G. (2000).Dung hoc Viet ngu. Ho chi Minh City: Education Publishing House.

Valentina, G. (2003).Politeness strategies as a challenging issue for foreign/Russian students within an

English context. In Department of Language and Culture, The Consequences of Mobility:

Linguistic and Sociocultural Contact Zones. Denmark: Roskilde University.
http://www.englishclub.com/grammar/verbs-questions-tag.htmhttp://www.englishclub.com/grammar/verbs-questions-tag.htmhttp://www.englishclub.com/grammar/verbs-questions-tag.htmhttp://www.englishclub.com/grammar/verbs-questions-tag.htm

Documents

4B06 Nguyen Thi Khoa Polite Strategies in English and Vietnamese Imperatives