Upload
others
View
14
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
University of Leeds 2 March 2006
4D-Var data assimilation of atmosphericCO2 from infrared satellite sounders
Richard Engelen European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts
Thanks to: Soumia Serrar, Yogesh Tiwari, Frédéric Chevallier and many others.
University of Leeds 2 March 2006
Outline
• COCO project – 1st attempt with a relativelysimple data assimilation system
• GEMS project – towards a full 4-dimensional greenhouse gas dataassimilation system
• Outlook & Conclusions
University of Leeds 2 March 2006
COCO
COCO (Measuring CO2 from space exploiting plannedmissions 2001 - 2004) was an European Union fundedIntegrated Project (IP) within the Fifth FrameworkProgramme.
The purpose of the COCO project was to takeadvantage of already planned satellite missions todevelop, evaluate and apply methods for the estimationof CO2 column inventories from space and subsequentlyto estimate CO2 emissions and CO2 surface exchangefluxes.
University of Leeds 2 March 2006
4D-Var Data Assimilation
4-dimensional variational data assimilation is in principle a least-squares fit in 4 dimensions between the predicted state of theatmosphere and the observations.
The adjustment to the predicted state is made at time To, whichensures that the analysis state (4-dimensional) is a model trajectory.
University of Leeds 2 March 2006
4D-Var Data Assimilation
4-dimensional variational data assimilation is in principle a least-squares fit in 4 dimensions between the predicted state of theatmosphere and the observations.
The adjustment to the predicted state is made at time To, whichensures that the analysis state (4-dimensional) is a model trajectory.
X0
University of Leeds 2 March 2006
4D-Var Data Assimilation
4-dimensional variational data assimilation is in principle a least-squares fit in 4 dimensions between the predicted state of theatmosphere and the observations.
The adjustment to the predicted state is made at time To, whichensures that the analysis state (4-dimensional) is a model trajectory.
CO2 is added tothe state vectoras a troposphericcolumn amountfor each AIRSobservation.
X0
University of Leeds 2 March 2006
CO2 column estimates
370 380 1.0 6.0
Mar2003
Mar2004
Sep2003
Mar2003
University of Leeds 2 March 2006
Comparison with in-situ observations
Japanese flight data kindly provided by H. Matsueda, MRI/JMA
370
380
University of Leeds 2 March 2006
Comparisons with models
University of Leeds 2 March 2006
Comparisons with models
University of Leeds 2 March 2006
GEMS
GEMS (Global and regional Earth-system Monitoringusing Satellite and in-situ data) is an European Unionfunded Integrated Project (IP) within the SixthFramework Programme.
The project will create a new European operationalsystem for global monitoring of atmospheric chemistryand dynamics and an operational system to produceimproved medium-range & short-range air-chemistryforecasts, through much improved exploitation ofsatellite data.
University of Leeds 2 March 2006
GEMS organisation
Validation
ReactiveGases
GreenhouseGases
AerosolRegional Air
Quality
University of Leeds 2 March 2006
Development of RTmodels and bias
correction methods
AIRS, IASI,CrIS,
Sciamachy,OCO, GOSATobservations
4D VARdata assimilation
system
Definition ofbackground errorcovariance matrix
CO2 & CH4analysis dataBuilding of surface
fluxparameterization/
model
CO2 & CH4Flux Inversions
Validation
Greenhouse gas activities
University of Leeds 2 March 2006
4D-Var Data Assimilation
In the 4D-Var version, CO2 is added to the state vector X0. Thismeans that only changes to the initial CO2 field can be made to fitthe observations within the assimilation window.
X0
CO2
University of Leeds 2 March 2006
Ocean
CO2 surface fluxes - climatology
University of Leeds 2 March 2006
Natural Biosphere
CO2 surface fluxes - climatology
University of Leeds 2 March 2006
Anthropogenic
CO2 surface fluxes - climatology
University of Leeds 2 March 2006
Using climatological fluxes (CASA, Takahashi,and Andres) we have made a 2 year run totest the system at resolution T159 (~ 1.125˚).
CO2 in ECMWF forecast model
University of Leeds 2 March 2006
Using climatological fluxes (CASA, Takahashi,and Andres) we have made a 2 year run totest the system.
CO2 in ECMWF forecast model
University of Leeds 2 March 2006
ECMWF model compared to surface flasks
Comparisons between CMDL surface flasks and the free-running ECMWF model show good agreement for the north-south gradients.
Southern hemisphere model values are slightly too low(missing biomass burning??)
University of Leeds 2 March 2006
ECMWF model compared to surface flasks
Comparisons between CMDL surface flasks and the free-running ECMWF model show good agreement for theseasonal cycle.
Northern hemisphere summer model values are slightly toohigh (missing land sink??)
University of Leeds 2 March 2006
A negative offset and a15h filtering is applied
to observations
SF6 high frequency comparisons
University of Leeds 2 March 2006
CO2 4D-Var setup
• T159L60 (1.125˚ x 1.125˚ with 60 levels)• 6-hour assimilation window• Background covariance:
Each layer only correlated with 2 layers directlyabove and below
Horizontal correlation length of 500 km Standard deviation of 2 ppmv
• Operational AIRS bias correction• Operational AIRS cloud detection
University of Leeds 2 March 2006
First CO2 4D-Var analysis results
After 31 days of 4D-Var, theanalysis has increased theglobal mean value as well asthe spatial gradients.
The increments in anyanalysis cycle are within ± 3ppmv.
369
387
-3.1
3.2
University of Leeds 2 March 2006
Zonal mean CO2 distributions
367
383
60 S 60N
The effect of assimilating AIRSradiances is mainly to increase CO2mixing ratios in the upper troposphereand reduce mixing ratios in the SHstratosphere.
However, a very simple backgrounderror matrix was used!!!
100
1000
0.35
-0.55
University of Leeds 2 March 2006
CO2 flux inversionsWeekly fluxes
Monthly fluxes
Simulated flux inversions forOCO data show error reductionsbetween 0 and 20 % over theocean and between 10 and 40 %over land.
The difference is caused by thesmall a priori flux errors overocean compared to the landfluxes.
These estimates assume thereare no significant systematicerrors.
Thanks to Frédéric Chevallier
University of Leeds 2 March 2006
Near-future improvements
• Use of diurnal biosphere fluxes• Possible use of flask optimized fluxes• Better specification of background
covariance matrix• 12 hour assimilation window• Different AIRS channel selection• Use of IASI radiances• Implement CH4
University of Leeds 2 March 2006
Conclusions
• First relatively simple implementation of CO2variable in operational data assimilation systemproved successful
• Work in progress to build a full 4D-Vargreenhouse gas data assimilation system thatcan combine observations from various satellitesensors to estimate atmospheric CO2
• These 4D atmospheric fields will then hopefullycontribute to a better quantification andunderstanding of the carbon surface fluxes.