Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Search... Submit QueryLATEST about 5 hours agoPentagon successfully tests micro-drone swarm
Home Topics Authors Featured Latest Posts Skype Podcasts Events Shop Contact Login
In From Around the Web, Science & Technology January 18, 2017 David Aragorn11 Views 0 comments
Pentagon successfully tests micro-drone swarm
The Pentagon may soon be unleashing a 21st-century version of locusts on its adversaries after officials on Monday said it had successfully tested a swarm of 103 micro-drones.
The important step in the development of new autonomous weapon systems
was made possible by improvements in artificial intelligence, holding open the
possibility that groups of small robots could act together under human
direction.
Military strategists have high hopes for such drone swarms that would be
cheap to produce and able to overwhelm opponents’ defenses with their great
numbers.
David AragornEDITOR
PROFILE Latest Posts
Most Viewed Commented
From Around the Web, Science & TechnologyJanuary 18, 2017
Pentagon successfully tests micro-drone swarm
From Around the Web May 5, 2016
Physicists Simulate Sending Particles of Light Into the Past, Strengthening the Case that Time Travel Is Possible
From Around the Web August 24, 2016
Ultraviolet light reveals how ancient Greek statues really looked
From Around the Web July 3, 2016
Mind over matter: Scientists study woman who can grow a seed into a plant in 20 minutes
Featured Videos June 21, 2016
Zimbabwe UFO Child Conactee Speaks Publicly For The 1st Time
Featured Videos July 4, 2016
Mysterious Birth Has This Woman Suspect That She May Be A Hybrid - EMN video exclusive
Share:
drones earth mystery news EMN micro-drones Pentagon Science & Technology
From Around the Web Science & Technology
Featured Videos
The test of the world’s largest micro-drone swarm in California in October
included 103 Perdix micro-drones measuring around six inches (16
centimeters) launched from three F/A-18 Super Hornet fighter jets, the
Pentagon said in a statement.
“The micro-drones demonstrated advanced swarm behaviors such as
collective decision-making, adaptive formation flying and self-healing,” it said.
“Perdix are not pre-programmed synchronized individuals, they are a collective
organism, sharing one distributed brain for decision-making and adapting to
each other like swarms in nature,” said William Roper, director of the
Pentagon’s Strategic Capabilities Office. “Because every Perdix communicates
and collaborates with every other Perdix, the swarm has no leader and can
gracefully adapt to drones entering or exiting the team.”
Defense Secretary Ash Carter—a technophile and former Harvard
professor—created the SCO when he was deputy defense secretary in 2012.
The department is tasked with accelerating the integration of technological
innovations into the US weaponry.
It particularly strives to marry already existing commercial technology—in this
case micro-drones and artificial intelligence software—in the design of new
weapons.
Originally created by engineering students from the Massachusetts Institute of
Technology in 2013 and continuously improved since, Perdix drones draw
“inspiration from the commercial smartphone industry,” the Pentagon said.
Source: Phys.org
Another Point of View, Featured Videos, You PostJanuary 1, 2017
Interview with Patty Greer
Featured Videos October 24, 2016
What Are These Balls Of Light?
Featured VideosSeptember 22, 2016
UFOs As A Gateway To Self Discovery - The Richard Dolan Show
Sid GoldbergFORMER_PUBLISHER
Claude LimbergerEXECUTIVE_EDITOR
Grant CameronCONTRIBUTOR
Linda Moulton HoweCONTRIBUTOR
Top Authors
Most Commented
Around The Web
Earth Mysteries, From Around the WebJanuary 18, 2017
Alien-like creatures emerge in central Australia following heavy rains
Earth Mysteries, From Around the WebJanuary 18, 2017
Confirmed: This giant squid video is the REAL thing
From Around the Web, SpaceJanuary 18, 2017
Follow the life of the last man on the moon
Ancient Archeology, From Around the WebJanuary 18, 2017
Mystery of the 'horrible hand' dino solved
From Around the Web May 5, 2016
Physicists Simulate Sending Particles of Light Into the Past, Strengthening the Case that Time Travel Is Possible
Featured Videos July 4, 2016
Mysterious Birth Has This Woman Suspect That She May Be A Hybrid - EMN video exclusive
Featured Videos June 21, 2016
Zimbabwe UFO Child Conactee Speaks Publicly For The 1st Time
Featured Videos June 27, 2016
#Disclosure Advocate Makes Secret NORAD Files Public
Featured Videos July 6, 2016
The Day After Disclosure: Richard Dolan's Unexpected Twist On What's Coming
Advertise | Become an EMN Member | Make Earth Mystery News Your Home Page | RSS | Careers | FAQ
Terms and Conditions | Privacy | Comment Policy | About Us | About Our Ads | Contact Us | Archive© 2011 Copyright Earth Mysteries News .com
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Earth Mysteries, From Around the Web January 18, 2017
Confirmed: This giant squid video is the REAL thing
Drone-photography company fined $200,000 by FAA
Learn More
Bart Jansen , USA TODAY Published 1:16 p.m. ET Jan. 17, 2017 | Updated 1:41 p.m. ET Jan. 17, 2017
WASHINGTON – A drone-photography company has agreed to pay a $200,000 penalty to settle
allegations without acknowledging violating federal regulations for flying remote-controlled aircraft for years
over New York and Chicago, the Federal Aviation Administration announced Tuesday.
SkyPan International agreed to pay an additional $150,000 if it violates the settlement during the next year, and
another $150,000 if fails to comply with the terms of the agreement, the FAA announced.
The FAA initially sought to fine SkyPan International $1.9 million, in the largest case yet against a drone
company.
"While neither admitting nor contesting the allegations that these commercial operations were contrary to FAA regulations, SkyPan wishes to resolve this
matter without any further expense or delay of business," the company said in a statement. "In exchange, the FAA makes no finding of violation."
FAA seeks record $1.9 million fine from drone company SkyPan
(http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2015/10/06/faa-drone-fine-skypan-19-
million/73441850/)
In the civil case filed in October 2015, the FAA alleged that SkyPan flew 65 unauthorized flights between March 21, 2012, and Dec. 15, 2014. SkyPan
lacked the proper certificate and registration for the flights, didn't have special permission from FAA or air-traffic control and the aircraft weren't equipped
with equipment to signal their presence to other aircraft, the FAA alleged.
SkyPan applied on Dec. 22, 2014, for an FAA exemption to fly drones, which the FAA approved April 17.
At the time of the disputed flights, FAA was developing its comprehensive regulations for commercial drones. The FAA began issuing waivers for
commercial flights in September 2014 and completed regulations for drones weighing up to 55 pounds in June 2016.
SkyPan said it has been conducting aerial photography above private property in urban areas for 28 years, using both full-size helicopters and remote-
controlled helicopters. The flights were typically over dirt, grass or paved lots to show high-rise views that assist developers with design plans for new
buildings, according to the company's application.
The images have been used to sell or lease $55 billion of commercial and residential real estate since 1988, according to the application for a waiver.
Clients included developers Durst, Extell, Hines, Howard Hughes, Vornado and Zeckendorf.
FAA’s drone regulations will allow SkyPan and others to fly in controlled airspace if authorized by air-traffic controllers. SkyPan in its statement urged the
industry to work collaboratively with the FAA to balance commerce with safety.
"SkyPan has never had an accident," the company said in resolving the FAA complaint. "SkyPan continues to strive to maintain the utmost levels of
safety, security, and privacy protection in its operations."
Read or Share this story: http://usat.ly/2k1kMSm
(Photo: Andrew Harnik, AP)
8�6��'(3$570(17�2)�75$163257$7,21)('(5$/�$9,$7,21�$'0,1,675$7,21
&(57,),&$7(�2)�:$,9(5�25�$87+25,=$7,21,668(' 72
&DEOH�1HZV�1HWZRUN��,QF���&11���5HVSRQVLEOH�3HUVRQ��*UHJ�$JYHQW:DLYHU�1XPEHU�����:�����������$
$''5(66 ±
2QH�&11�&HQWHU��6XLWH�17����%�$WODQWD��*HRUJLD������
7KLV�FHUWLILFDWH�LV�LVVXHG�IRU�WKH�RSHUDWLRQV�VSHFLILFDOO\�GHVFULEHG�KHUHLQDIWHU��1R�SHUVRQ�VKDOO�FRQGXFW�DQ\�RSHUDWLRQ�SXUVXDQW�WR�WKH�DXWKRULW\�RI�WKLV�FHUWLILFDWH�H[FHSW�LQ�DFFRUGDQFH�ZLWK�WKH�VWDQGDUG�DQG�VSHFLDO�SURYLVLRQV�FRQWDLQHG�LQ�WKLV�FHUWLILFDWH��DQG�VXFK�RWKHU�UHTXLUHPHQWV�RI�WKH�)HGHUDO�$YLDWLRQ�5HJXODWLRQV�QRW�VSHFLILFDOO\�ZDLYHG�E\�WKLV�FHUWLILFDWH�
23(5$7,216 $87+25,=('
6PDOO�XQPDQQHG�DLUFUDIW�V\VWHP��V8$6��RSHUDWLRQV�RYHU�KXPDQ�EHLQJV�LQ�DFFRUGDQFH ZLWK�WKH�&11�8$6�2SHUDWLRQV�0DQXDO��)RWRNLWH�3UR���2SHUDWRU�*XLGH��DQG�)RWRNLWH�3UR���6SHFLILFDWLRQV�6KHHW�
/,67 2):$,9(' 5(*8/$7,216 %< 6(&7,21 $1' 7,7/(
���&)5��������� 2SHUDWLRQ RYHU�KXPDQ�EHLQJV�
67$1'$5'�3529,6,216
�� $�FRS\�RI�WKH�DSSOLFDWLRQ�PDGH�IRU WKLV�FHUWLILFDWH�VKDOO�EH�DWWDFKHG�WR�DQG�EHFRPH�D�SDUW�KHUHRI��� 7KLV�FHUWLILFDWH�VKDOO�EH�SUHVHQWHG�IRU�LQVSHFWLRQ�XSRQ�WKH�UHTXHVW�RI�DQ\�DXWKRUL]HG�UHSUHVHQWDWLYH�RI�WKH�$GPLQLVWUDWRU�RI�WKH�
)HGHUDO�$YLDWLRQ�$GPLQLVWUDWLRQ��RU�RI�DQ\�6WDWH�RU�PXQLFLSDO�RIILFLDO�FKDUJHG�ZLWK�WKH�GXW\�RI�HQIRUFLQJ�ORFDO�ODZV�RU�UHJXODWLRQV�
�� 7KH�KROGHU�RI�WKLV�FHUWLILFDWH�VKDOO�EH�UHVSRQVLEOH�IRU�WKH�VWULFW�REVHUYDQFH�RI�WKH�WHUPV�DQG�SURYLVLRQV�FRQWDLQHG�KHUHLQ��� 7KLV�FHUWLILFDWH�LV�QRQWUDQVIHUDEOH�127(²7KLV�FHUWLILFDWH�FRQVWLWXWHV�D�ZDLYHU�RI�WKRVH�)HGHUDO�UXOHV�RU�UHJXODWLRQV�VSHFLILFDOO\�UHIHUUHG�WR�DERYH��,W�GRHV�QRW�FRQVWLWXWH
D�ZDLYHU�RI�DQ\�6WDWH�ODZ�RU�ORFDO�RUGLQDQFH�
63(&,$/�3529,6,216
6SHFLDO�3URYLVLRQV�1RV��� WR�����LQFOXVLYH��DUH�VHW�IRUWK�RQ�WKH�DWWDFKHG�SDJHV�
7KLV�&HUWLILFDWH�RI�:DLYHU����:������������LV�HIIHFWLYH�IURP�1RYHPEHU����������WR�$XJXVW����������DQG�LV�VXEMHFW�WR�FDQFHOODWLRQ�DW�DQ\�WLPH�XSRQ�QRWLFH�E\�WKH�$GPLQLVWUDWRU�RU�DQ�DXWKRUL]HG�UHSUHVHQWDWLYH�
%<�',5(&7,21�2)�7+(�$'0,1,675$725
*HQHUDO�$YLDWLRQ�DQG�&RPPHUFLDO�'LYLVLRQ��$)6����
)$$�)RUP��������������� &&�
3 D J H � � R I � �
�ĞƌƚŝĨŝĐĂƚĞ�ŽĨ�tĂŝǀĞƌ�EƵŵďĞƌ͗�ϭϬϳtͲϮϬϭϱͲϬϬϬϬϭ�
63(&,$/�3529,6,216�,668('�72&DEOH�1HZV�1HWZRUN��,QF���&11�
*HQHUDO�
7KH�)$$¶V�)OLJKW�6WDQGDUGV�6HUYLFH�KDV�UHYLHZHG�\RXU�DSSOLFDWLRQ�WR�HQVXUH�FRPSOLDQFH�ZLWK�WKH�UHTXLUHPHQWV�RI�7LWOH����&RGH�RI�)HGHUDO�5HJXODWLRQV�����&)5��SDUW������7KH�$GPLQLVWUDWRU�ILQGV�WKDW�WKH�SURSRVHG�V8$6�RSHUDWLRQ�FDQ�EH�FRQGXFWHG�VDIHO\�XQGHU�WKH�SURYLVLRQV�RI�WKLV�&HUWLILFDWH�RI�:DLYHU��:DLYHU��DV�OLVWHG�EHORZ��EHFDXVH�DGHTXDWH�PLWLJDWLRQV�IRU�ULVNV�LQYROYHG�ZLWK�RSHUDWLQJ�WKH�V8$6�LQ�WKH�PDQQHU�GHVFULEHG�KDYH�EHHQ�HVWDEOLVKHG��7KH�)$$�XVHG�WKH�IROORZLQJ�GRFXPHQWV�WR�DQDO\]H�DQG�DSSURYH�WKLV�:DLYHU�DQG�LWV�DVVRFLDWHG�SURYLVLRQV��&11�8$6�2SHUDWLRQV�0DQXDO��&RQFHSW�RI�2SHUDWLRQV��2SHUDWLRQDO�5LVN�$VVHVVPHQW��)RWRNLWH�3UR�2SHUDWRU�*XLGH��)RWRNLWH�3UR�6SHFLILFDWLRQ�6KHHW��)RWRNLWH�6DIHW\�'DWDVKHHW��DQG�57,�)RWRNLWH�5HSRUW��$GKHUHQFH�WR�WKH�SURYLVLRQV RI�WKLV�:DLYHU�HVWDEOLVKHV�D�OHYHO�RI�VDIHW\�WKDW�HQVXUHV�VDIH�RSHUDWLRQV�ZLWKLQ�WKH�QDWLRQDO�DLUVSDFH�V\VWHP�
7KLV�:DLYHU�PD\�EH�FDQFHOHG�DW�DQ\�WLPH�E\�WKH�$GPLQLVWUDWRU��WKH�SHUVRQ�DXWKRUL]HG�WR�JUDQW�WKH�:DLYHU��RU�WKH�UHSUHVHQWDWLYH�GHVLJQDWHG�WR�PRQLWRU�D�VSHFLILF�RSHUDWLRQ��$V�D�JHQHUDO�UXOH��WKLV�:DLYHU�PD\�EH�FDQFHOHG�ZKHQ�LW�LV�QR�ORQJHU�UHTXLUHG��WKHUH�LV�DQ�DEXVH�RI�LWV�SURYLVLRQV��RU�ZKHQ�XQIRUHVHHQ�VDIHW\�IDFWRUV�GHYHORS��)DLOXUH�WR�FRPSO\�ZLWK�DQ\�SURYLVLRQ�OLVWHG�EHORZ�LV�D�YLRODWLRQ�RI�WKH�WHUPV�RI�WKLV�:DLYHU�DQG�PD\�VHUYH�DV�MXVWLILFDWLRQ�IRU�FDQFHOODWLRQ�
/LVW�RI�5HJXODWLRQV�:DLYHG�E\�6HFWLRQ�DQG�7LWOH��7KH�IROORZLQJ�UHJXODWLRQV�DUH�ZDLYHG�
���&)5����������2SHUDWLRQV�RYHU�KXPDQ�EHLQJV�LV�ZDLYHG�WR�DOORZ�V8$6�RSHUDWLRQV�RYHU�KXPDQ�EHLQJV�
&RPPRQ�3URYLVLRQV��7KH�5HVSRQVLEOH�3HUVRQ��*UHJ�$JYHQW��IRU�&DEOH�1HZV�1HWZRUN��,QF���&11���LV�GLUHFWO\�UHVSRQVLEOH�IRU�VDIHW\�RI�RSHUDWLRQV�FRQGXFWHG�XQGHU�WKLV�:DLYHU�DQG�ZLOO�HQVXUH�WKH�UHPRWH�3LORW�LQ�&RPPDQG��3,&���PDQLSXODWRU�RI�WKH�FRQWUROV��DQG�9LVXDO�2EVHUYHU�FRPSOLHV�ZLWK�DOO�SURYLVLRQV�RI�WKLV�:DLYHU�
�� 7KLV�:DLYHU�PXVW�QRW�EH�FRPELQHG�ZLWK�DQ\�RWKHU�ZDLYHU�V���DXWKRUL]DWLRQV�V���RU�H[HPSWLRQ�V��ZLWKRXW�VSHFLILF�DXWKRUL]DWLRQ�IURP�WKH )$$�
�� 7KH�)$$�KDV�WKH�DXWKRULW\�WR�FDQFHO�RU�GHOD\�DQ\�RU�DOO�IOLJKW�RSHUDWLRQV�LI�WKH�VDIHW\ RI�SHUVRQV�RU�SURSHUW\�RQ�WKH�JURXQG�RU�LQ�WKH�DLU��DUH�LQ�MHRSDUG\�RU�WKHUH�LV�D�YLRODWLRQ�RI�WKH�WHUPV�RI�WKLV :DLYHU�
�� 2SHUDWLRQV�XQGHU�WKLV�:DLYHU�DUH�WR�EH�FRQGXFWHG�LQ�&ODVV�*�DLUVSDFH�RQO\�XQOHVV VSHFLILF�DLUVSDFH�DXWKRUL]DWLRQ�RU�:DLYHU�LV�UHFHLYHG�IURP�WKH�)$$�LQ�DFFRUGDQFH�ZLWK�� �������
�� $�FRS\�RI�WKLV�:DLYHU�PXVW�EH�DYDLODEOH�GXULQJ�:DLYHUHG�V8$6 RSHUDWLRQV�
�� 7KH�5HVSRQVLEOH�3HUVRQ�OLVWHG�RQ�WKLV�:DLYHU�PXVW�PDLQWDLQ�D�FXUUHQW�OLVW�RI�SLORWV�E\�QDPH�DQG�UHPRWH�SLORW�FHUWLILFDWH�QXPEHU�XVHG�LQ�WKH�:DLYHU�KROGHU¶V�RSHUDWLRQV��7KLV OLVW�PXVW�EH�SUHVHQWHG�IRU�LQVSHFWLRQ�XSRQ�UHTXHVW�IURP�WKH�$GPLQLVWUDWRU�RU�DQ�DXWKRUL]HG�UHSUHVHQWDWLYH�
3 D J H � � R I � �
�ĞƌƚŝĨŝĐĂƚĞ�ŽĨ�tĂŝǀĞƌ�EƵŵďĞƌ͗�ϭϬϳtͲϮϬϭϱͲϬϬϬϬϭ�
�� 7KH�5HVSRQVLEOH�3HUVRQ�OLVWHG�RQ�WKLV�:DLYHU�PXVW�PDLQWDLQ�D�FXUUHQW�OLVW�RI VPDOO�XQPDQQHG�DLUFUDIW��V8$��E\�UHJLVWUDWLRQ�QXPEHU�V��XVHG�LQ�WKH�:DLYHU�KROGHU¶V�RSHUDWLRQV��7KLV�OLVW�PXVW�EH�SUHVHQWHG�IRU�LQVSHFWLRQ�XSRQ�UHTXHVW�IURP�WKH�$GPLQLVWUDWRU�RU�DQ�DXWKRUL]HG UHSUHVHQWDWLYH�
2SHUDWLRQV�2YHU�+XPDQ�%HLQJV�6SHFLDO�3URYLVLRQV��V8$6�RSHUDWLRQV�PD\�EH�FRQGXFWHG�RYHU�KXPDQ�EHLQJV�SURYLGHG�
�� /DXQFK�DQG�UHFRYHU\�DUHDV�PXVW�EH�GHVLJQDWHG�DQG�PDUNHG�WR�NHHS�DQ\�SHUVRQ�QRW�GLUHFWO\�SDUWLFLSDWLQJ�LQ�WKH�RSHUDWLRQ�RXW�RI�WKH�DUHDV�SULRU�WR��GXULQJ��DQG�LPPHGLDWHO\�IROORZLQJ�IOLJKW RSHUDWLRQV�
�� 7KH�UHPRWH�3,&�LV�UHVSRQVLEOH�IRU�KDOWLQJ�RU�FDQFHOLQJ�RSHUDWLRQV�LI��DW�DQ\�WLPH��WKH�VDIHW\�RI�KXPDQ�EHLQJV�RU�SURSHUW\�RQ�WKH�JURXQG�RU�LQ�WKH�DLU�LV�LQ�MHRSDUG\��RU�LI�WKHUH LV�D�IDLOXUH�WR�FRPSO\�ZLWK�WKH�SURYLVLRQV�RI�WKLV :DLYHU�
�� 7KH�5HVSRQVLEOH�3HUVRQ�OLVWHG�RQ�WKLV�:DLYHU�KDV�WKH�UHVSRQVLELOLW\�WR�WUDLQ�HDFK UHPRWH�SLORW�LQ�WKHLU�RSHUDWLRQDO�SURFHGXUHV�LQFOXGLQJ�HPHUJHQF\�FRQWLQJHQFLHV�DQG�LQ�VSHFLDO�SURYLVLRQV�RI�WKLV�:DLYHU��DOO�WUDLQLQJ�IRU�DQ\�LQGLYLGXDO�GLUHFWO\�SDUWLFLSDWLQJ�LQ WKH�RSHUDWLRQ�RI�WKH�V8$6�PXVW�EH�GRFXPHQWHG�DQG�DYDLODEOH�WR�WKH�$GPLQLVWUDWRU�RU�DXWKRUL]HG�UHSUHVHQWDWLYH�XSRQ�UHTXHVW��WUDLQLQJ�GXULQJ�RSHUDWLRQV�RYHU�KXPDQ�EHLQJV�LV�SURKLELWHG�
��� 7KH�UHPRWH�3,&�PXVW�EH�SURILFLHQW�LQ�WKH�VDIH�RSHUDWLRQ�RI�WKH�V8$6�SULRU�WR�RSHUDWLRQ�RYHU�KXPDQ�EHLQJV�DQG�PXVW�DGKHUH�WR�&11¶V�UHTXLUHPHQWV�WR�PDLQWDLQ�IOLJKW�SURILFLHQF\�
��� ,QGLYLGXDOV�GLUHFWO\�SDUWLFLSDWLQJ�LQ�WKH�RSHUDWLRQ�RI�WKH�V8$6�PXVW�EH�HDVLO\�LGHQWLILDEOH�YLVXDOO\�
��� *URXQG�VSHHG�RI�WKH�V8$�ZKLOH�RSHUDWLQJ�RYHU�KXPDQ�EHLQJV�PXVW�QRW�H[FHHG���PLOHV�SHU KRXU�
��� 7KH�V8$�PD[LPXP�ZHLJKW�ZKLOH�RSHUDWLQJ�RYHU�KXPDQ�EHLQJV�FDQQRW�H[FHHG������SRXQGV�H[FOXGLQJ�WHWKHU�DQG FRQQHFWRU�
��� 0D[LPXP�DOWLWXGH�RI�WKH�V8$�ZKLOH�RSHUDWLQJ�RYHU�KXPDQ�EHLQJV�LV�UHVWULFWHG�WR��� IHHW�DERYH�JURXQG OHYHO�
��� $Q\�PRGLILFDWLRQ�WR�WKH�V8$6�GHVLJQ�LV�SURKLELWHG��UHSDLU�DQG�UHSODFHPHQW�RI�GDPDJHG�FRPSRQHQWV�LV�DOORZHG�ZLWK�D�UHSODFHPHQW�SDUW�WKDW�LV�H[DFWO\�WKH�VDPH�DV�WKH�RULJLQDO��QR�VXEVWLWXWLRQV�DUH�DOORZHG�XQOHVV�D�QHZ�ZDLYHU�DSSOLFDWLRQ�LV VXEPLWWHG�
��� 2SHUDWLRQV�RYHU�RSHQ�DLU�DVVHPEOLHV�RI�KXPDQ�EHLQJV�DUH SURKLELWHG�
��� $OO�RSHUDWLRQV�PXVW�EH�FRQGXFWHG�RYHU�SULYDWH�RU�FRQWUROOHG�DFFHVV�SURSHUW\ ZLWK�SHUPLVVLRQ�IURP�D�SHUVRQ�ZLWK�OHJDO�DXWKRULW\�WR�JUDQW�DFFHVV� DQG
3 D J H � � R I � �
�ĞƌƚŝĨŝĐĂƚĞ�ŽĨ�tĂŝǀĞƌ�EƵŵďĞƌ͗�ϭϬϳtͲϮϬϭϱͲϬϬϬϬϭ�
��� 1RWLFH�PXVW�EH�SURYLGHG�WR WKH�KXPDQ�EHLQJV�ZLWKLQ�WKH�FRQWUROOHG�DFFHVV�SURSHUW\� SULRU�WR�FRQGXFWLQJ�DQ\�RSHUDWLRQV�RYHU�KXPDQ�EHLQJV�WKDW�D�V8$�PD\�IO\�RYHU WKHP�
Page 1 Copyright: Pix4D
I. Introduction
The Royal Canadian Mounted Police started using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles to help them with their
work on collision and crime scene investigations. It allows the investigations to be conducted under all
weather conditions and provides broader views than the traditional procedures.
This past September, an experimental project was organized by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police
(RCMP) and Pix4D, using UAV models from Draganfly and Aeryon Labs to acquire images of a staged car
accident scene from low altitude. The images were processed by Pix4Dmapper to reconstruct the three-
dimensional scene. In this article, we compare the time spent and accuracy between UAV mapping
and traditional procedures, including laser scanner.
The project aims to propose a solution protocol for accident scene investigations. Additionally, by
including the accuracy and reliability of the output results, it ensures not only that the whole process is
efficient and accurate but also that the reconstruction results can be eventually used as admitted
evidence in court.
II. Presentation of the Project
The project took place in Regina, Canada. A staged car accident scene was set up to reproduce a crash
of two vehicles with a person fallen out of one of the vehicles. The RCMP took photographs and
measurements before anything was moved. The yellow plastic evidence markers indicated where each
piece of evidence was found.
Aeryon Labs and Draganfly rotary-wing UAVs were used to acquire images with very high overlap and
ground sampling distances of 0.6 and 0.9 centimeters respectively. Both UAVs acquired oblique photos
by flying a few circles around the scene as well as nadir photos with grid flight plans above the crime
scene. Both flights lasted between ten and twenty minutes. A total of 225 images from Aeryon Labs and
212 images from Draganfly were obtained during the flights.
A few on-site measurements were made by the police. GPS measurements of the object corners and
the evidence markers were used as ground control points, and tape measurements between the markers
were recorded for further assessment of the final results.
Pix4Dmapper’s total processing time was approximately two hours on a laptop with a core i7 and 8GB
RAM. A densified point cloud, digital surface model (DSM) and orthomosaic were generated. Annotation
and measurements were directly made in the software user interface.
A New Protocol of CSI For The Royal Canadian Mounted Police
Page 2 Copyright: Pix4D
III. Data Acquisition
The total pre-flight preparation time was approximately ten minutes. Both UAV models weigh less than
two kilograms and thus are light enough to be easily unpacked and operated by a single person. Once the
flight plan set, it took less than twenty minutes to complete the designed flights. For the proposed protocol,
the entire on-site process time is estimated within thirty minutes, excluding optional measurements.
Nadir images taken with grid flight plans achieved high overlaps and eliminated systematic errors. A few
circular flights were performed to obtain oblique images of the most focused area in order to cover as
many facades as possible. With a flying height of approximately forty meters above the ground, images
with a ground sampling distance of less than one centimeter were collected. These images provided
accurate and detailed information of the collision.
In order to improve the global accuracy of the final results (which is optional), several points were
measured with kinetic GPS and total station. These points were picked from corners of the vehicles, the
feature objects, and the evidence markers. They were imported into the software and used either as
ground control points, manual tie points or check points.
In addition to the measurements mentioned above, a
terrestrial laser scanner was set up in several locations to
scan over the entire scene, to be used for quality
assessment of the UAV results.
The laser-scanned point cloud was compared with the
Pix4Dmapper point cloud in respect to their density,
accuracy and how they fit the actual needs.
Page 3 Copyright: Pix4D
IV. Comparison with Traditional Procedures
Traditionally, the collision investigation workflow adapted by most police departments - including the
RCMP - uses tapes, GPS and laser scanners. Tapes and GPS provide a limited number of measurements.
They are written down in field books, and it is not easy to recall precisely where the measured spots were
located. Plus, these measurements may easily contain manual mistakes and are not accessible in all
situations.
Usage of laser scanners is expensive and time consuming, and the delicate instruments need to be
operated by trained professionals. Some other issues to take into consideration are the obstruction of
laser beams and the difficulty of finding appropriate locations to set up the scanners, resulting in missing
point cloud data of extremely important information in some hard-to-reach yet focused areas.
One or a combination of the three principal measuring methods are used depending on
circumstances. Sometimes one method is enough to cover the whole scene while in other conditions the
combination of two or more of them is required to complete the tasks.
New UAV era
UAVs provide more practical solutions as they respond faster to emergency cases. They are already
broadly used for natural disaster monitoring, and can also serve as an ideal reconstruction workflow for
accident investigations.
We propose the use of UAVs for several reasons - rather than choosing case-by-case from the
measuring methods - as it is more likely to fit all solutions. For wide-coverage accident scenes, UAVs save
hours or even days on the time spent gathering data and
measurements.
The proposed protocol contains three simple steps:
1) UAV preparation and data acquisition
2) 3 to 5 tape or GPS measurements
for quality improvement and assessment
3) Pix4Dmapper processing with a fully automatic workflow
The whole procedure, including the on-site flight and an additional ten minutes of optional but
recommended measurements for quality assessment, can be completed right after the accident occurred.
For this project, the total processing time of Pix4Dmapper was approximately two hours. After processing,
the whole scene was reconstructed and the terrain model, point clouds, and orthomosaic were exported.
Annotation and measurement were then directly performed in the software.
Page 4 Copyright: Pix4D
V. Accuracy Assessment with On-site Measurement and Laser Scanner Result
a) Compare UAV+Pix4Dmapper results with tape measurements
Eight evidence markers, labeled with the
numbers 1 to 8, had their positions surveyed
by GPS and thus were with known
coordinates. Tapes were used to measure
the following distances between markers:
1-2, 3-4, 5-6, and 7-8.
The same distances were also measured
by the measuring tools in Pix4Dmapper.
These two types of measurements were
compared with the same distances
calculated directly from the known
coordinates of markers.
b) UAV+Pix4Dmapper results in RCMP Truck Dimensions
Images acquired by the UAVs were processed and the three-
dimensional scene was reconstructed by Pix4Dmapper. As seen
in the lower graphs, we measured the width, length, and height
of the RCMP truck directly in the software, and the results
exactly match the real RCMP truck dimensions.
These results confirm the high accuracy of Pix4Dmapper, both
for its processing and measuring capabilities.
Page 5 Copyright: Pix4D
c) Compare UAV+Pix4Dmapper results with laser scanner measurements
Laser scanner measurements are well-known to provide accurate point clouds and to have high
penetration through objects. In this example, we could actually see some points inside the vehicles.
However, it took more preparation time than the UAVs and the scanner's set-up position and scanning
angles were not flexible. From the graphs below, we can observe that the scanner obtained much fewer
points. Another difficult problem to solve was the obstruction of views, resulting in lack of details in the
focused area around the body.
Rotary wing UAVs like the Draganfly and Aeryon Labs systems are capable of getting very close to the
aim with good control. The number of points generated by Pix4Dmapper for the point cloud depends on
the image resolution, image quality and the program settings. For a dataset of less than one centimeter
GSD, Pix4Dmapper provides both high accuracy and fine details of the scene.
Page 6 Copyright: Pix4D
VI. Additional Showcase - RCMP Office Reconstruction
In addition to the collision scene project, two data sets from the RCMP office were acquired. The outdoor
images were taken from various heights above and around the office building by UAVs and hand-held
cameras (Canon 6D and GoPro); the indoor images were taken only by hand-held cameras (GoPro),
collecting information from the corridors and from one office. Outdoor flight plans were following:
Indoor images were acquired while passing through the corridor and entering an office inside the building.
The photographed office was located to the right of the corridor, as seen in the small circle on the image
position path here under. Sub-projects of both the inside and outside of the building were processed
separately and then merged into one project.
Processing with Pix4Dmapper required less than two hours for the
outdoor data set containing 421 images. For the indoor data set of
139 images, it required only ten minutes to reconstruct and half an
hour for point densification. Manual points were added in the
projects and clicked manually to help with the merging process.
T h e two sub-projects were then merged successfully, as seen in
the rayCloud editor of Pix4Dmapper and the windows and door
shared by both data sets were perfectly matched. We also see from
the graphs below that the image positions of the indoor data set
correctly match the outdoor reconstruction.
The merged project kept the same accuracy as the individual
projects and we were able to measure the indoor objects directly in
the software, for example the magazine width displayed in the figure
on the right.
Page 7 Copyright: Pix4D
VII. Conclusion ���� ����������
Unmanned Aerial Vehicles have become the most practical solution in many urgent cases. They can be
used to search and save survivors in the wilderness, to collect updated photos or videos for monitoring
natural disasters and to reconstruct traffic collision or crime scenes to be presented in court. These are
only some examples of conditions where timeliness is the most critical concern.
The combination of UAVs for image acquisition and Pix4Dmapper for converting images into results
provides a complete solution to reconstruct accident and crime scenes and solves vital issues not covered
by traditional methods.
Why use UAVs+Pix4Dmapper?
They provide angles with multiple views from the ground as well as from the air. Obtaining information
from a bird's-eye view is very helpful as it solves important issues when evidence is spread out and it is
difficult to get a good perspective from ground level. Previously, helicopters were used to provide such
complimentary information. However, organizing an available copter to cover the scene sometimes
takes up to several days and by that time, outdoor evidence already might have been altered or washed
out due to weather conditions (heavy rain or snow).
Compared to other precision instruments such as laser scanners, the cost of execution and
maintenance of UAV mapping is much lower. Packed in an easily transportable case and a weight of
under two kilograms, UAVs can be carried everywhere. And UAVs are ready to fly after some minutes of
assembling only. Such small systems are also easier to use and maintain, saving expenses and time
spent on training staff.
Using UAVs and Pix4Dmapper for reconstructing accident and crime scenes provides an immediate response, saves time and expenses and offers highly accurate outputs. Generated results are available permanently and the files and make measurements anytime he/she requires to. Actual scenes are preserved in 3D and with detailed information within centimeter accuracy.
Applies to all conditions
Efficient and time saving, immediate response
High accuracy for measurements
Views from all angles, no missing details
Easy to operate and maintain, less training needed
Both outdoor and indoor reconstruction, seamless merging
Permanent preservation of data and reconstructed scene