Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
04-FEB-2020EIEN20 Design of Electrical Machines
5. Electromagnetics Electric and magnetic circuits
Lund University / LTH / IEA / Avo Reinap / EIEN20 / 2020-02-04 2
L5: Electromagnetics• Previous lectures• Transformer example (A1)• Geometric optimisation of a transformer• Electromagnetic energy conversion• Equivalent circuits• Home assignment A2 and A3
Lund University / LTH / IEA / Avo Reinap / EIEN20 / 2020-02-04 3
Previous lectures• Basic formulation for
electromagnetic devices• Heat transfer is
described by heat equation
• Electromagnetism by Maxwell’s equations
• Electro-mechanism by electromagnetic stress tensor or virtual work
Gauss’s Law, Heat transfer
Faraday’s law
Ampere’s circuital law
Gauss’s Law, Electricity
Gauss’s Law, Electricity
Magnetic stress per unit of area
Change of system energy
S m dstF
tBE
JH
D
q
0 B
mWF
Lund University / LTH / IEA / Avo Reinap / EIEN20 / 2020-02-04 4
Previous lectures• Model – description of system and structure• Modelling – study of the behaviour of the model• Numerical modelling – handle the complexity of PDE
Method Finite element method (FEM)
Finite difference method (FDM)
Boundary element method (BEM)
Equivalent circuit method (ECM)
Point mirroring method (PMM)
Principle of discretisation
m1
m2
q
q* Geometry
approximation Extremely flexible Inflexible Extremely flexible Specific geometries
Simple geometries
Non-linearity Possible Possible Troublesome Possible By constant factors
Computational cost High High High Very low Low
Lund University / LTH / IEA / Avo Reinap / EIEN20 / 2020-02-04 5
FEM from user point of view• Design and development or Exploration of
component details for system performance and reliability improvement
• Analysis – from series of static analysis, towards quasistatic, transient, multiphysics, …
• Geometric input – programmable geometric modeller, CAD reader/reparation, livelink
• Material library• Analysis loops, sensitivity study, optimization• Comparing FEMM, Ansys and Comsol multiphysics• Closer look at electromagnetic design Ansys vs
Comsol
Lund University / LTH / IEA / Avo Reinap / EIEN20 / 2020-02-04 6
Short overview
Function Control & CAD
Attractive feature
Femm 2D XY RZ, Static & quasistatic
*.lua, *.m. *.py
Simplicity & accessibility
Ansoft ALL *.js, *.py Integrated competence
Comsol ALL With and without *.m multiphysics
• List of Finite Element Software packages
• ..
W
Lund University / LTH / IEA / Avo Reinap / EIEN20 / 2020-02-04 7
• User defined: Workbench -> design modeller -> Maxwell
• Library based: RMxprt, 2D @ 3D
Ansys Maxwell
Lund University / LTH / IEA / Avo Reinap / EIEN20 / 2020-02-04 8
Comsol• All-in-One• Features in
multiphysics overweight the detailed electromagnetic features for machines – self define instead of built in
– Torque calculation
– Core loss modelling
Lund University / LTH / IEA / Avo Reinap / EIEN20 / 2020-02-04 9
Energy conversion• Energy is the capacity of a system to do work• Energy cannot be created or destroyed, but only
converted from one form into another• Coupling between the different fields obeys to the
principle of energy conversion
Lund University / LTH / IEA / Avo Reinap / EIEN20 / 2020-02-04 10
Transformer example (A)• In essence the common
purpose of the transformer is
– Power transfer– Power conditioning – Galvanic separation
• The model of a transformer can be established either by starting from power transfer or power conditioning requirement
Intercoupled circuits: Electrical, magnetic and thermal
Lund University / LTH / IEA / Avo Reinap / EIEN20 / 2020-02-04 11
Transformer example (B)
• The geometry of a single-phase shell and core type of transformer at the point of the geometrical optimum
• The largest available cross-section area of electric and the magnetic ‘conductor’
Lund University / LTH / IEA / Avo Reinap / EIEN20 / 2020-02-04 12
Transformer example (C)• A single phase shell type
of transformer• Height, htr, undefined i.e.
calculate transformer per meter
• Transferred power is ideally P=UI=0.5ωBm Am Jm Ae
• Losses Ploss =qe Ve +qm Vm
Lund University / LTH / IEA / Avo Reinap / EIEN20 / 2020-02-04 13
Transformer example (D)
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 10
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
slotting factor, Ks [-]po
wer
per
met
re, P
/m [W
/m]
fem =0.2W/mKecm =0.2W/mKfem =0.05W/mKecm =0.05W/mK
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 10
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5x 107
slotting factor, Ks [-]
curre
nt d
ensi
ty, J
m [A
/m2 ]
fem =0.2W/mKecm =0.2W/mKfem =0.05W/mKecm =0.05W/mK
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 10
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
slotting factor, Ks [-]
loss
es, Q
/m [W
/m]
fem =0.2W/mKecm =0.2W/mKfem =0.05W/mKecm =0.05W/mK
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 10.74
0.76
0.78
0.8
0.82
0.84
0.86
0.88
0.9
0.92
0.94
slotting factor, Ks [-]
effic
ienc
y,
[-]
fem =0.2W/mKecm =0.2W/mKfem =0.05W/mKecm =0.05W/mK
Improved thermal design, by higher thermal conductivity of coil impregnation
transferred power increases Pout~I,
efficiency Ploss~I2
and proportions between coils and core remain nearly the same
Lund University / LTH / IEA / Avo Reinap / EIEN20 / 2020-02-04 14
Transformer example (E)• Power rating (hc=0.04m)
– Modeled 150-210 VA– Referred 125-150 VA
• Conductor losses (Pcu)– Modeled 4.5-10.5 W– Referred 12-13 W
• Magnetizing losses (Po)– Modeled 4.5 W– Referred 5 W
Lund University / LTH / IEA / Avo Reinap / EIEN20 / 2020-02-04 15
Shell type vs core type
• Parameterization of construction– Transformer volume Vtr=ltr*wtr*htr=ltr3*kw*kh
• Comparison of different layouts
Φ B I J
length
Volume
?tr
me
VAA
Lund University / LTH / IEA / Avo Reinap / EIEN20 / 2020-02-04 16
Performance equations• Apparent power
• Voltage
• Magnetic flux
• Current
• Ability to transfer power
• Losses
• Core losses are estimated from the specific loss curves
• Flux density is constant • Power density
mmmeeeloss qlAqlAP
memmmm AAJBIUS 21
21
mm IUS21
dt
tdNdt
tdtetUtu m cos
tABtN
Utt
mmm
m
sinsin
sin
tNAJ
tN
NItIti
em
mm
cos
coscos
ptrmmtr
klJBVS
21
Lund University / LTH / IEA / Avo Reinap / EIEN20 / 2020-02-04 17
Maximized cross-sections (A)
• geometrically optimal relation between the electric and the magnetic core
p
sTHH
p
sTWW
pHW
sslfttr
tr
meptr N
kkkN
kkkNkk
kkkkkl
VAAkl 11
2
0.25 0.5 1 2 4 8relative transformer width, kW [-]
core type
00
0
2
2
2
2
22
24
4
4
4
4 6
6
6
8
8
101012
14
0.25 0.5 1 2 4 80.25
0.5
1
2
4
8
relative transformer width, kW [-]
rela
tive
trans
form
er h
eigh
t, k H
[-]
shell type
0 0
22
22
2
2
2
44
4
4
4
6
6
68
8
10
10
1214
Height factor:hc =htr -kTH *lsWidth factor: ws =wtr -kTW *lc
Vm=ltr3*kH *kW
Lund University / LTH / IEA / Avo Reinap / EIEN20 / 2020-02-04 18
Minimal temperature rise
• According to the same loss density (W/m3) and thermal conductivity (W/mK)
0.25 0.5 1 2 4 8relative transformer width, kW [-]
core type
00
0
2
2
2
22
4
4
4
44
6
6
6
8
8
10
10
12
14
16
0.25 0.5 1 2 4 80.25
0.5
1
2
4
8
relative transformer width, kW [-]
rela
tive
trans
form
er h
eigh
t, k H
[-]
shell type
0 02 2
2
2
4 4
4
4
4
6
6
6
8
8 1010
12
14
16
Lund University / LTH / IEA / Avo Reinap / EIEN20 / 2020-02-04 19
electromagnetic coupling
• Magnetically coupled coils • Coupling facilitated by the magnetic core• FEM becomes useful when defining inductances: self,
mutual, leakage• Challenges: dynamic effects, saturation, hysteresis
2
11
221
121
22
11
III
LMML
nnnn
n
n
n i
ii
LMM
MLMMML
2
1
21
2221
1121
2
1
Lund University / LTH / IEA / Avo Reinap / EIEN20 / 2020-02-04 20
Electromagnetic energy converter
• Electromagnetic energy converter via intermediate magnetic field
• Equivalent circuit representation of the different fields
i1
e1
Rμ
N1i1
u1
RΩ1 Lσ1
i2
Rδ
e2
RΩ2Lσ2
u2
N2i2
Lund University / LTH / IEA / Avo Reinap / EIEN20 / 2020-02-04 21
Energy conversion principle
• The energy conservation principle says that the sum of electrical energy input to a device at each time instant has to be equal to the sum of accumulated electromagnetic energy and losses.
lossmagk
kk dWdWdtui
1
Lund University / LTH / IEA / Avo Reinap / EIEN20 / 2020-02-04 22
Electrical energy• Considering Kirchhoff’s voltage equations the
differential of the electric energy consists of resistive voltage term and electromotive voltage term
• According to Faradays law the opposing electromotive voltage can be either a transformed voltage or/and a motional voltage
kkconductorkkkkk didWdtedtRiidtui
dxdL
dtdxi
dtdiLiL
dtd
dtde
Lund University / LTH / IEA / Avo Reinap / EIEN20 / 2020-02-04 23
Magnetic energy• The magnet energy is distributed in all passive elements• The differential of flux is expressed through the
permeance and the mmf drop in the magnetic element• The permeances are: linear, parametric nonlinear and
inherently nonlinear ones• The differential of magnetic energy in non-parametric
elements are expressed in terms of currents and flux linkages
we N
kkk
N
kkkmag didFdW
11
Lund University / LTH / IEA / Avo Reinap / EIEN20 / 2020-02-04 24
Losses• Losses in an electromechanical energy converter can
be separated according the loss origin: electrical, magnetic (and mechanical)
• Electromagnetic losses shear often the same loss mechanism.
• Common for the losses is a phenomenon of friction that opposes (current) flow, magnetisation, motion, etc and causes (irreversible) heat energy loss.
coreconductor
m
jcorejjloss dWdWdWdtRidW
1
2
Lund University / LTH / IEA / Avo Reinap / EIEN20 / 2020-02-04 25
Ideal transformer• Ideal loss-free
electromagnetic coupling• Electrical equations
• Magnetic equations
• The primary mmf balan- ces the secondary mmf
• The transformation coefficient n is in accordance with instantaneous power balance
• The transformer property is of changing impedances
dtdN
dtdu
dtdN
dtdu
22
2
11
1
22
11
iPNiPN
222
22
11
11 ZnI
UnI
UZi
2
1
1
2
1
2
ii
NN
uun
Lund University / LTH / IEA / Avo Reinap / EIEN20 / 2020-02-04 26
Real transformer• Real loss-leaky
electromagnetic coupling• Electrical equations
• Magnetic equations
• The imperfection of magnetic coupling
• substitution of the magnetic circuit into the electrical equations
dtdiM
dtdiLiRu
dtdiM
dtdiLiRu
122222
211111
2
22
1
2
2
221222
1
11
2
1
1
112111
NiL
NMi
NiL
NiL
NMi
NiL
MNNLL
MNNLL
1
222
2
111
212
2222
211
11111
niidtdM
dtdiLiRu
niidtdM
ndtdiLiRu
Lund University / LTH / IEA / Avo Reinap / EIEN20 / 2020-02-04 27
Equivalent circuit
• The resulting equivalent system according to equations• Corresponding components in phasor diagram
201 nIII
222111122222 jXRIjXRnInUjXRIEU
Lund University / LTH / IEA / Avo Reinap / EIEN20 / 2020-02-04 28
Electric circuit (A)
• Complete equivalent circuit of a transformer
11 NE m
m XNI 1
0
1
10 N
PRNI fe
cc
Lund University / LTH / IEA / Avo Reinap / EIEN20 / 2020-02-04 29
Electric circuit (B)
• The small voltage drop in R1 and X1 compared to U1 , and Small magnetizing current I0 in comparison with load current I1 allows the shunt terminals transfer to primary terminals,
• The secondary quantities R2 and X2 may be replaced on the primary side by using ideal transformer property R’2 =R2 /n2 and X’2 =X2 /n2 ,
• The new equivalent circuit can be used for small power transformer that simplifies the analysis and parameter identification from the experiments.
Lund University / LTH / IEA / Avo Reinap / EIEN20 / 2020-02-04 30
Magnetic circuit (A)• Transformer can be seen
as an electromagnetic inductor that is loaded with a secondary winding
• Loaded transformer– Source flux 1 ,– Linked flux 2 ,– Leakage flux σ ,
Gμ1 Gμσ Gμ2
φ2
φ1
i1N1
u1 u2
i2N2
NI
Pc1Pgap
Pc2
Pσ
c
σ
Lund University / LTH / IEA / Avo Reinap / EIEN20 / 2020-02-04 31
Magnetic circuit (B)• Short-circuited ideal
transformer – R2 =0Ω– Ψ2 =0Vs– Lσ = Ψ1 /i1
• Short-circuited real transformer
– R2 ≠0Ω– Ψ2 =- Ψ20
Gμ1 Gμσ Gμ2
φ2
φ1
i1N1
u1
i2N2
Lund University / LTH / IEA / Avo Reinap / EIEN20 / 2020-02-04 32
Thermal circuit (A)• Node points i, Qi [W], i [K]
1. Coil loss and temperature2. Tooth loss and temperature3. Yoke loss and temperature4. Ambience temperature
• Thermal conductivity elements Gij [W/K]– From coil to tooth G12
– From coil to yoke G12
– From tooth to yoke G23
– From yoke to ambience G34
G13
G12
G34
G23
4
3
2 1
Lund University / LTH / IEA / Avo Reinap / EIEN20 / 2020-02-04 33
Thermal circuit (B)• Topology matrix • Circuit formulation
ijji Gnodenodekelement:)T(k,
34
23
13
12
434323312211
GGGG
T
000
00
3
2
1
4
3
2
1
3434
343423132313
23231212
13121312
QQQ
GGGGGGGG
GGGGGGGG
QG
BBNNN
B giveninitially
GQG 1
Lund University / LTH / IEA / Avo Reinap / EIEN20 / 2020-02-04 34
Transient heat flow• Thermal model representing a
physical model• Many simplifications and
approximations• Heat is not internally
generated in the body• Losses are applied to specific
node-point
1
Rth 2
Cth P
2
1
12
121
av
ththth CRCP
dtd
t
ambmamb
thththththm
th
e
cVRRCRP
1
Lund University / LTH / IEA / Avo Reinap / EIEN20 / 2020-02-04 35
Electromagnetic energy conversion
• The static coupling between the electric and the magnetic field bases on Amperes law.
• The dynamic coupling between the electric and the magnetic field bases on Faraday’s law.
Lund University / LTH / IEA / Avo Reinap / EIEN20 / 2020-02-04 36
Ampere’s circuit law• Ampere’s circuit law says that the circulation
of magnetic field intensity around any closed path is equal to the current flowing through the enclosed surface.
• The magnetomotive force, mmf, is analogous to emf and could be seen as the capability to produce magnetic flux through a circuit.
Lund University / LTH / IEA / Avo Reinap / EIEN20 / 2020-02-04 37
Faraday’s induction law• Faraday’s induction law is a relation between time-
varying electrical field and originated magnetic field or vice versa.
• The negative sign is a statement that the induced emf will force the current to flow in a direction that counteracts the change of magnetic flux. The statement that an induced current counteracts its’ originate is known as Lenz law.
• The electro motive force, emf, could be seen as the current producing capability in a circuit.
Lund University / LTH / IEA / Avo Reinap / EIEN20 / 2020-02-04 38
Coupled fields• Varying magnetic field induces electric field
• Electric field causes electric current and resistive losses and these losses thermal heating in the conductive material
dtdds
dtddl
SC
BE
22 EiEi tpec
Lund University / LTH / IEA / Avo Reinap / EIEN20 / 2020-02-04 39
Eddy currents in a plate
• It is assumed that induced current flow only in the horizontal direction (x) and the electric field is linearly dependent on y from the centre of the plate
dt
dByyEBywdtdyEwyE z
xzxx 22E
Ex(y), i
Ex(y), iy
Bz
z
x
w
d
Lund University / LTH / IEA / Avo Reinap / EIEN20 / 2020-02-04 40
Power loss in the plate• The instantaneous power loss per unit of volume
• The mean value of the instantaneous loss across the cross-section
221, y
dtdBytp z
ec
222/
2/
22
1211,
dtdBddywy
dtdB
dwytp z
d
d
zec
Lund University / LTH / IEA / Avo Reinap / EIEN20 / 2020-02-04 41
Magnetic saturation
0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.1-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
time, t [sec]
norm
aliz
ed q
uant
ities
a(t)
/max
(a(t)
)
u(t)B(t)i(t)e(t)
• Electromagnetic devices are usually voltage driven, FEM formulation for electromagnetics current driven
• Electromagnet with geometric and material input• Electromagnetic transient• Useful modelling environment Matlab Simulink, modelling
examples in SimPowerSystems
Lund University / LTH / IEA / Avo Reinap / EIEN20 / 2020-02-04 42
Magnetic hysteresis
Lund University / LTH / IEA / Avo Reinap / EIEN20 / 2020-02-04 43
3φ transformers
• Construction: Shell and core type
• Connections: Y-Y,Y-Δ, …• Control: Tertiary windings
Lund University / LTH / IEA / Avo Reinap / EIEN20 / 2020-02-04 44
3φ transformer models in Simulink
Lund University / LTH / IEA / Avo Reinap / EIEN20 / 2020-02-04 45
Home assignments: A1 – A4
Lund University / LTH / IEA / Avo Reinap / EIEN20 / 2020-02-04 46
Home assignment A2
0 5 10 15 20 25 300
100
200
300
400
In/O
utpu
t pow
er, P
i,Pu [W
]
0 5 10 15 20 25 300.4
0.6
0.8
1
effic
ienc
y,
[-]
load current, Iout [A]0 5 10 15 20 25 30
0
5
10
15
20
Cop
per l
osse
s, P
cu [W
]
0 5 10 15 20 25 307
8
9
10
Cor
e lo
sses
, Pfe
[W]
load current, Iout [A]
0 5 10 15 20 25 300
1
2
3
Inpu
t cur
rent
, Iin
[A]
0 5 10 15 20 25 300
10
20
30
Out
put v
olta
ge U
2 [V]
load current, Iout [A]0 5 10 15 20 25 30
0
2
4
6
curre
nt d
ensi
ty, J
cm2 [A
/mm
2 ]
0 5 10 15 20 25 30-100
-50
0
Out
put v
olta
ge re
qula
tion
U
2 [-]
load current, Iout [A]
• U2 given, how you get transformer? • How to compare MEC and FEM?
– Magnetisation– Load characteristics
Lund University / LTH / IEA / Avo Reinap / EIEN20 / 2020-02-04 47
Home assignment A3• PMSM model based on
lumped equivalent circuits
– Magnetic– Thermal
• Compare with FEM– Shear stress– Sheet current density
• Try to improve your initial design