36
Chapter 5 REACTOR CONFIGURATION

5 - Reactor Design

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

introducing reactor design clearly

Citation preview

Page 1: 5 - Reactor Design

Chapter 5

REACTOR CONFIGURATION

Page 2: 5 - Reactor Design

Reactor operation in order of precedence

Page 3: 5 - Reactor Design

Adiabatic operation

(simplest and cheapest)

Cold shot & Hot shot

(direct contact heat transfer, control reaction rate)

Indirect heat transfer

(for heat integration / heat recovery)

Heat carrier (inert / feed excess / product recycle)

(for change of heat capacity of mixture)

Catalyst profiles

Page 4: 5 - Reactor Design
Page 5: 5 - Reactor Design

• Very rapid reaction, must be stopped quickly

• Very hot / cold / corrosive products

• Fouling problem in conventional exchanger

Page 6: 5 - Reactor Design

Steps inheterogeneous reactions

Page 7: 5 - Reactor Design

External diffusion

Internal diffusionAdsorption / Desorption

Chemical reaction

Page 8: 5 - Reactor Design

Contacting patterns for gas–liquid reactors

Page 9: 5 - Reactor Design

Plug–flow models

(a) Countercurrent packed bed or plate column

Packing / trays (heterogeneoussolid catalyst) for interfacialarea

(b) Cocurrent packed bed (trickle–bed reactor)

For case with gas flowgreater than liquid flow,liquid in films form

(c) In–line static mixer

For case which requiresa short residence time

Page 10: 5 - Reactor Design

In–line static mixer structure

Page 11: 5 - Reactor Design

In–line static mixer structure

Page 12: 5 - Reactor Design

Plug–flow & Mixed–flow models

(d) Spray column

Mixed–flow in gas phase, plug–flow inliquid phase

For case with mass transfer resistancein liquid phase (solid contain or solidformation in the reaction)

(e) Bubble column

Mixed–flow in liquid phase, plug–flow ingas phase

For case with mass transfer resistance ingas phase (solid contain in liquid),disadvantage in high viscous liquid

Page 13: 5 - Reactor Design

Mixed–flow models

(f) Agitated tanks

For case with high viscous liquid

Page 14: 5 - Reactor Design

Contacting patterns for liquid–liquid reactors

Page 15: 5 - Reactor Design

Plug–flow models

(a) Countercurrent packed bed or plate column

Packing / trays (heterogeneoussolid catalyst) for interfacialarea

(b) Multi–stage agitated contactor

A large number of stageswith agitator

(c) In–line static mixer

For case which requiresa short residence time

Page 16: 5 - Reactor Design

Plug–flow & Mixed–flow models

(d) Spray column with heavy liquid dispersed

Mixed–flow in light liquid phase, plug–flow in heavy liquid phase

(e) Bubble column with light liquid dispersed

Mixed–flow in heavy liquid phase, plug–flow in light liquid phase

Page 17: 5 - Reactor Design

Mixed–flow models

(f) Agitated tank with settler

The more stages that tends tocountercurrent plug–flow

Page 18: 5 - Reactor Design

Mass transfer driving force

𝒂 > 𝒃 > 𝒄 > 𝒅 > 𝒆 > 𝒇

Page 19: 5 - Reactor Design

Reactor configurations

Page 20: 5 - Reactor Design

Tubular reactors

• Suitable to high temperature and high pressure

• Combination to static mixers for good mixing

• Construction is similar to heat exchanger

• Well control of residence time

Page 21: 5 - Reactor Design

Stirred–tank reactors

Page 22: 5 - Reactor Design

Stirred–tank reactors

• Suitable to both homogeneous and heterogeneous, low

pressure, not high viscous liquid and non–hazardous

chemical

• Suitable to batch or semi–batch operation because of

flexibility

• Combination to jacket, internal coil and flow loop for heat

exchanger

• Better temperature control in case of large volume reactor

Page 23: 5 - Reactor Design

Fixed–bed reactors

Page 24: 5 - Reactor Design

Fixed–bed reactors

Page 25: 5 - Reactor Design

Fixed–bed reactors

• Most designs approximate to plug–flow behavior

• The packed bed can be catalyst, solid reactant or servesonly to good contact phase between gas and liquid

• Combination to cold / hot shot, intermediate cooling /heating, or shell & tube heat exchangers

• Difficult for temperature control

• More popular design is that uses a parallel reactorssystem for catalyst regeneration

Page 26: 5 - Reactor Design

Moving–bed reactors

• In case the rate ofdegradation in a fixed bedmight be unacceptable

• Possible to remove thecatalyst continuously forregeneration

Page 27: 5 - Reactor Design

Fluidized–bed reactors

Page 28: 5 - Reactor Design

Fluidized–bed reactors

• Catalyst or solid reactant in form of fine particles is heldin suspension for good heat transfer and temperatureuniformity, limitation of hot spot formation

• The solid phase tends to be in mixed flow, but the gasphase behaves more like plug flow. Overall performancelies somewhere between mixed flow and plug flow

• Advantage for removing / adding heat to reactorthrough the cycle of catalyst

• One disadvantage is that attrition of catalyst, then lostfrom the system

Page 29: 5 - Reactor Design

Kilns

Page 30: 5 - Reactor Design

Kilns

Page 31: 5 - Reactor Design

Kilns

• For case reactions involving free–flow solid, paste andslurry materials

• The behavior of the reactor usually approximates plug–flow

• High temperature reactions demand refractory linedsteel shell and heated by direct firing

Page 32: 5 - Reactor Design

Reactor selection for heterogeneous reactions

Page 33: 5 - Reactor Design

The order of precedence

Fixed–bed adiabatic

Fixed–bed with Cold shot & Hot shot

Tubular with indirect heating / cooling

Moving bed

Fluidized bed

Page 34: 5 - Reactor Design

Catalyst deactivation

Fixed–bedadiabaticfor veryslow DCC(years)

Fixed–bedwith Coldshot & Hotshot for veryslow DCC(years)

Tubular withindirect heating/ cooling forvery slow DCC(years)

Moving bed forslower DCC(hours, days)

Fluidized bedfor very shortDCC (seconds)

Page 35: 5 - Reactor Design

Capital cost

Fixed–bedadiabatic

Fixed–bedwith Coldshot & Hotshot

Tubular withindirectheating /cooling

Moving bed

Fluidizedbed

Page 36: 5 - Reactor Design

Trade–offs in reactor selection

Reactor configuration

Reactor size

Catalyst deactivation

Selectivity

Interaction with the rest

process