Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1Demystifying Multi-Managers
Extracting the best out of managers
– high conviction portfoliosThese days it isn’t enough to invest with a number of investment
managers, and receive the diversification benefits. Clients now
demand more from their investments, which in turn requires
further commitment from investment managers to delivering the
best outcome for investors. One way to extract the most out of
managers is the use of high conviction portfolios.
What is a high conviction portfolio?
High conviction portfolios contain holdings of securities that an
investment manager believes will have the highest expected return,
in essence their best ideas. As a result, high conviction portfolios
are expected to generate a higher level of return than a manager’s
standard portfolio.
A high conviction portfolio typically comprises large holdings of
a relatively small number of stocks. An investment manager will
therefore pay little attention to country, industry and stock
weighting relative to an index benchmark when constructing this
type of portfolio. As a result, the expected risk or volatility of the
portfolio is also higher.
The diagram opposite indicates how a high conviction portfolio
compares to a manager’s standard portfolio on the risk / return space.
Edition 3
DemystifyingMulti-Managers
There has been a lot of interest in ‘multi-manager’
investing recently, as advisers, researchers, platforms
and, importantly, investors recognise the important
risk-reduction that can result from diversifying a
portfolio across a range of investment managers.
Whilst the benefits of diversification across different
investment managers (and asset classes) are
appreciated by most advisers, what is less clear are
the important differences between the various forms
of multi-manager investing, and the impacts on both
clients and advisers.
This article follows on from earlier articles, and
considers how to get the best out of managers within
a multi-manager solution, by using ‘high conviction
portfolios’. We explain what these are, why they
are useful, and emphasise the importance of the
relationship between MLC and the manager when
using these types of mandates.
Expected Risk
Investment manager’sstandard portfolio
Investment manager’sconcentrated portfolio
ExpectedReturn
2 Demystifying Multi-Managers
Why don’t all investment managers offer highconviction portfolios?
Because a high conviction portfolio typically holds a smaller number
of stocks, it can exhibit significant volatility when compared to a
broad index benchmark (eg S&P/ASX300 Accumulation Index or
MSCI All Countries World Index) and other managers. The resultant
degree of volatility of investment returns will not be acceptable to all
investors, particularly if they allocate all or a large part of their
investment strategy to such a high conviction style.
In addition to increased volatility, most managers fear being too
different from their peers due to the associated business risk. For
example, if an investment manager’s fund returned negative 10%
when their peers funds returned similar negative results, the risk of
them losing business is mitigated – they do not stand out from the
crowd. However if they returned the same result while their peer
returns were positive, and if this pattern persisted even for a
relatively short period of time, the threat of the manager losing
investor funds is heightened.
Managers are generally forced to create their ‘standard’ offers as
through the investor holds just their funds, and doesn’t want the
extra volatility associated with a high conviction portfolio. This is
because the manager does not know how an investor and/or adviser
are using the fund within a client’s portfolio, and must assume an
investor is investing in solely their fund.
In order to reduce this business risk, individual investment managers
broaden their portfolio security holdings in their standard public offer
funds to dampen volatility and ensure they do not differ too much
from the index or competitor funds. This means that they maintain
exposure to a range of securities with a high weighting in an index
for risk control purposes, rather than a strong belief in their future
expected return (eg News Corporation Limited and National Australia
Bank Limited, which form a large part of Australian indices).
MLC, on the other hand, encourage our investment managers to pay
less attention to their business risk and build high conviction discrete
mandates for our investors. That is, MLC encourages managers not
to hold stocks such as News Corporation and National Australia Bank
if they don’t think the security is going to increase in value.
The diagram below illustrates how a standard portfolio may differ
from a high conviction portfolio
However, because high conviction portfolios typically have a lower
number of stocks than standard portfolios, the volatility of the
portfolio (compared to an index) also increases.
How does MLC control this volatility?
MLC can reduce the portfolio volatility on behalf of investors, by
blending a number of complementary high conviction managers
together in a multi-manager strategy, without reducing expected
investment returns.
The diagram below illustrates that MLC is able to reduce this extra
volatility by combining high conviction portfolios managed by a
broad range of specialist investment managers who are individually
exceptional but who have different and complimentary investment
styles. The well-diversified MLC multi-manager portfolio can
therefore reduce risk substantially.
The result is a portfolio that has a higher expected return than just
blending a manager’s standard portfolio, as often done by many of
new multi-manager offerings within the market.
Stocks the manager likesStocks the manager holds to reduce
business risk, and reduce the risk of
performance divergence from the selected
index, can be considered as ‘padding’
Standard Fund High Conviction
Tracking error
Expectedexcessreturn
3Demystifying Multi-Managers
The MLC Australian Share strategy
To illustrate the degree of variation from the index in MLC’s high
conviction portfolios, both at individual manager and at a
consolidated level, we will examine the Australian share asset class.
MLC uses seven Australian share managers whose discrete MLC
mandates are combined to form the overall MLC Australian share
portfolio. Having seven excellent but different managers means that
no one manager can materially disrupt the overall performance of
the MLC portfolio if their style is out of favour, they are unlucky or
they simply got a few calls wrong.
The individual manager portfolios very in size in terms of the
number of stocks; they range from as few as 30 to more than 140.
Importantly, when the seven portfolios are consolidated to form
MLC’s Australian share portfolio, the result is a broadly diversified
portfolio containing approximately 240 stocks (as at 31 May 2004)
which represents a collection of the highest conviction ideas from
each of our seven managers.
The following chart shows the proportion of each of our incumbent
managers’ portfolios that are different to the index. This is simply
the sum total of all their active overweights in their portfolio at each
point in time (ie in effect this is their cumulative bet against the
index). An investment manager aiming to replicate the index should
have minimal active money in their portfolio and therefore be
expected to track along the 0% line in this chart.
As you can see from the above diagram, the MLC Australian share fund is between 25-30% active compared to the index.
You are unlikely to be able to construct portfolios in this manner
without using individually managed mandates. Off the shelf
investment options offered via a fund of funds, master trust or
wrap accounts are designed as investments in their own right and
therefore may not be tailored to be part of a high conviction multi-
manager portfolio such as MLC’s. That is, portfolios created from
manager’s standard offering are likely to have a lot less ‘active’
money, and have a lower active proportion of the fund’s investments.
MLC Australian Equities Strategy - Active Money vs ASX300
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Jan-03
Feb-03
Mar-03
Apr-03
May-03
Jun-0303
Jul- Aug-03
Sep-03
Oct-03
Nov-03
Dec-03
Jan-04
Feb-04
Mar-04
Apr-04
May-04
Jun-04
Date
Active Money Relative
Concord
Contango
CSAM
Lazard AE
Jardine
DFA
MBA
MLC AE
4 Demystifying Multi-Managers
This advice is intended to provide general information only and has been prepared by MLC Limited (ABN 90 000 000 402) without taking into accountany particular persons objectives, financial situation or needs. Investors should, before acting on this information, consider the appropriateness of thisinformation having regard to their personal objectives, financial situation or needs. We recommend investors obtain financial advice specific to theirsituation before making any financial investment or insurance decision. MLC Limited, 105-153 Miller Street, North Sydney NSW 2060, is a member of theNational group of companies.
5332
7M
LC10
/07
How does MLC gain access to high conviction portfolios?
In summary
Once MLC Investment Management has identified a manager that
they believe has a sustainable competitive edge (which can be the
culmination of several years of MLC researching a manager), they
work carefully with that manager to ensure the MLC portfolio is a
pure reflection of that manager’s best ideas.
It is often difficult to convince a manager to run high conviction
portfolios as this can either take the manager outside their comfort
zone (ie they personally feel uncomfortable running higher conviction
portfolios) or their business model is such that they do not wish to
run multiple strategies.
MLC convinces managers to run high conviction portfolios on behalf
of our investors by:
• Having sufficient scale to make it commercially viable for the
manager to offer a unique individually managed portfolio to MLC.
With in excess of $45 billion dollars in funds under advice, the
allocation to each of our incumbent managers is substantial
(typically in excess of A$1 billion) and therefore can justify the
additional attention required to manage such portfolios. High
quality international managers will generally not accept individual
mandates for less than US$50 million which is beyond the
means of most Australian investors.
• Entering into sophisticated discussions with the manager in
which we demonstrate that their high-conviction portfolio will not
significantly increase the riskiness for investors due to the overall
MLC multi-manager portfolio.
• Demonstrating that we truly understand what we are buying,
how this may behave throughout a full market cycle, and as such
prove that past performance does not drive our manager hire/fire
decisions. In doing so, we can point to many such example over
our history of managing managers in this way since 1986.
Platinum and Maple-Brown Abbott are two such examples having
experienced an extended period of soft performance during the
mid to late 1990’s then subsequently rebounding strongly.
• Suggesting that new investment managers we employ confirm
our credentials by speaking to our other managers.
This article has discussed MLC’s use of high conviction portfolios.
We learned how MLC works with our investment managers to
ensure that these mandates are designed to ensure that each
investment manager has the scope to fully express their views and
insights, and as such get the most from their competitive edge.
MLC is able to use these discrete high conviction investment
mandates through:
• sufficient scale to justify the additional attention required of the
manager to run such mandates,
• a close relationship with our managers and a deep
understanding of their skill and faith in their ability,
• experience gained in multi-manager portfolio construction
since 1986, and a long-term and forward looking focus.
The resulting consolidated MLC portfolios are unique and contain
the best ideas of a number of different investment specialists which
improves the long term wealth creating potential for MLC investors.