#55 Meram v. Edralin

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/24/2019 #55 Meram v. Edralin

    1/2

    #55 MERAM v. EDRALIN REYES

    TOPIC: CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION

    DOCTRINE: Appointments under the civil service lawshould be based on merit and ftness and should never

    depend on how intimate a riend or how closely related anappointee is to the powers that be.

    FACTS:

    1. Respondent Filipina Edralin, training ocer o theureau o Forest development !F"#, was proposedor appointment to the position o Administrative$cer %, R&'( in the Administrative "ivision oF".

    ). *erein +etitioner, administrative ocer R&'-, andr. Agravio /upply $cer %, R&'- fled theirprotests against the proposal.

    (. "irector o F" sent a memorandum to therespondent minister stating that there are 0 F"personnel in the central oce who are consideredne2t&in&ran34 to the vacant position !includingpetitioner and Agravio#. t was also ound out thatEdralin5s current position was not ne2t&in&ran3.

    0. 6/6 orwarded to the respondent minister theprotests. /ubse7uently !) days ater# respondent

    inister orwarded the permanent appointment oEdralin as administrative $cer % to the6ommission or appropriate action.

    8. Appointment approved by the 6ommission sub9ectto the outcome o the protests o the petitioner andr. Agravio. Respondent minister dismissed theprotests.

    :. +etitioner and Agravio appealed to the erit/ystems oard. / decided in avor o Agravio.*owever, / modifed its decision revo3ing

    Agravio5s appointment on the ground that he hadbeen ine;ective in the said position. +etitioner wasappointed in the vacant position.

    '. Respondent appealed to the 6/6. "enied.Respondent fled a letter&petition with the $ce o

    the +resident invo3ing /ection 1 o +.". ?o. @-'./he averred that the / and 6/6 had no9urisdiction on petitioner5s appeal.

    a. urisdiction in promotional contests is lodgedwith the inistry head and appeal by theaggrieved party rom decisions o saidinistry head should be ta3en to the $ce othe +resident.

    @. +resident sent a letter to ustice BaCaro !+residentialAssistant or Begal A;airs# to tell "irector o F" tosuspend everything pending study by the $+.

  • 7/24/2019 #55 Meram v. Edralin

    2/2

    o its e2clusivity but was, in act, repealedaltogether.

    a. +etitioner, correctly fled her protest with the/ in accordance with +.". ?o. 10-