4
07/06/18 1 Berna Güroğlu 5 June 2018 EARLI SIG22: Neuroscience & Education, June 46, 2018, London Learning with friends: Neural processing of performance feedback in a social context across adolescence Takehome message * Social context modulates neural responses to feedback * This social context effect is further modulated by age Learning Distraction … … or Motivation? Social learning Individual context Social context

5June2018 EARLI Guroglu · 1.5 Friend > Solo Play Friend Neutral Individual Friend Neutral Play Observe Posterior Superior Temporal Sulcus Social&context&effect& Social&vs&Individual&

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 5June2018 EARLI Guroglu · 1.5 Friend > Solo Play Friend Neutral Individual Friend Neutral Play Observe Posterior Superior Temporal Sulcus Social&context&effect& Social&vs&Individual&

07/06/18

1

Berna  Güroğlu  5  June  2018  

EARLI  SIG22:  Neuroscience  &  Education,  June  4-­‐6,  2018,  London  

Learning  with  friends:  Neural  processing  of  performance  feedback  

in  a  social  context  across  adolescence  

Take-­‐home  message  

* Social context modulates neural responses to feedback * This social context effect is further modulated by age

Learning   Distraction  …  

…  or  Motivation?   Social  learning  

Individual context Social context

Page 2: 5June2018 EARLI Guroglu · 1.5 Friend > Solo Play Friend Neutral Individual Friend Neutral Play Observe Posterior Superior Temporal Sulcus Social&context&effect& Social&vs&Individual&

07/06/18

2

Learning  

Performance  

Feedback  processing    

Feedback  

Performance can have consequences for:

Self

Self and others (e.g., friends)

SOCIAL  Learning  

Q1: What is the role of the social context (shared goals) during feedback processing?

Q2: Does the social context effect hold for different age groups across adolescence?

Research  Questions   Participants  

85 participants in 3 age groups: * Pre-adolescents (9-12 years; M = 10.53 years); N = 23 (39% F) * Early-adolescents (12-14 years, M=12.93 years); N = 31 (49 % F) * Mid-adolescents (15-17 years; M=16.10 years); N = 30 (55% F)

PEERS  Project  

Participant + best friend

Neutral peer (Age-matched confederate)

Cannonball

Cannonball  

Control'group' Psychopathic'group'

Cannonball'task' Monitoring'other’s'ac7ons'

A' B'

Correct'Ac7on' Bu:on'Press'

= Correct

= Incorrect De Bruijn et al., J Neurosci, 2009

Page 3: 5June2018 EARLI Guroglu · 1.5 Friend > Solo Play Friend Neutral Individual Friend Neutral Play Observe Posterior Superior Temporal Sulcus Social&context&effect& Social&vs&Individual&

07/06/18

3

De Bruijn et al., J Neurosci, 2009

3 conditions of Play:

Individual (Offline; consequences for self only)

Friend (Online; shared consequences)

Neutral peer (Online; shared consequences)

Cannonball  

OFFLINE: 20 trials Individual

ONLINE: 4 alternating blocks of Play & Observe (10 trials each)

Friend (Play & Observe)

Neutral peer (Play & Observe)

Cannonball   Social  context  effect  

Lateral PFC (-63, 20, 19)

-1

-0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

Friend Neutral Individual Friend Neutral

Play Observe

Lateral Prefrontal Cortex

pSTS (-66, -40, 13)

-1

-0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

Friend Neutral Individual Friend Neutral

Play Observe

Posterior Superior Temporal Sulcus

Social  context  effect   Social  vs  Individual  

Posterior mPFC (0, 14, 49)

Higher mPFC activation for Social context in early adolescence

-1

-0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

9-11 years 12-13 years 15-16 years

Friend > Solo Play Neutral > Solo Play

11years 13 years 16 years

Friend > Individual Neutral > Individual

Page 4: 5June2018 EARLI Guroglu · 1.5 Friend > Solo Play Friend Neutral Individual Friend Neutral Play Observe Posterior Superior Temporal Sulcus Social&context&effect& Social&vs&Individual&

07/06/18

4

* Feedback on performance that has consequences for others involves higher activation in brain regions related to social cognition (pSTS) and behavior regulation (lPFC) * Early adolescents activate mPFC relatively more for feedback on performance with consequences for others than for individual performance * Effects hold for friends as well as for unfamiliar peers

Conclusions   Implications  

* Social context might influence learning by modulating neural responses to feedback processing * Early adolescents might be more sensitive to the social context of peers during learning

-­‐  Participants,  parents  &  theater  schools  -­‐  Data  collection:  AaZe  Snelting  &  Jorien  van  Hoorn  -­‐  Data  analysis:  Sandy  Overgaauw  -­‐  Ellen  de  Bruijn  

Funding:                        VENI  (Güroğlu),  RT  grant  (van  Hoorn)  

Thank  you  for  your  attention!  

Contact:  [email protected]