23
6 th GCC Primary Health Care Conference Riyadh Kingdom of Saudi Arabia 05 June 2007 The Effectiveness of Primary Care Elizabeth A. Dubois Associate Director of Public Health / Health Economist Wandsworth Teaching PCT, London, UK

6 th GCC Primary Health Care Conference Riyadh Kingdom of Saudi Arabia 05 June 2007 The Effectiveness of Primary Care Elizabeth A. Dubois Associate Director

  • View
    216

  • Download
    2

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

6th GCC Primary Health Care Conference Riyadh

Kingdom of Saudi Arabia 05 June 2007

The Effectiveness of Primary Care

Elizabeth A. Dubois Associate Director of Public Health / Health Economist

Wandsworth Teaching PCT, London, UK

Content…

• Priorities for Primary Care • Effectiveness of Primary Care• Evaluation• Conclusion

3

Priorities for Primary Care

1. Prioritise Expenditure

2. Control Substitution

3. Responsiveness to Population & Accountability

4. Ability to Deliver

5. Roles of PC Team

6. Diversity & Quality

7. Demand Management

8. Education & Training in PC

Factors Influencing Care

Government

Patients

Physicians

choicesatisfaction/quality

equity

costs

standards

clinical freedom

5

Prioritise Expenditure

• Agree responsibility for prioritising:

– Services

– Service spend

• Budget holding – powerful tool of change

• Professionals responsible for resource allocation

• Micro-level service development

6

Facts…..

Cost-Effectiveness (Intervention cost/case):

• Telephone Call £16

• Primary Care £15

• GP with Special Interest £55

• Outpatient £150

• Day Surgery £500

• Inpatient (2ndary Care) £5000

7

Facts…..

Cost-Effectiveness (Intervention cost/case):

• Telephone Call £16

• Primary Care £15

• GP with Special Interest £55

• Outpatient £150

• Day Surgery £500

• Inpatient (2ndary Care) £5000

8

Control Substitution

• Shift work from secondary care to primary care

• Define primary and community care in its own right, not a residual

• Vehicle of change rather than the receiver of it

9

Responsiveness to Population & Accountability

• Define core population need

– Health needs assessments

– Comparative audits

• Accountability to patients

• Accountability to the managers

• Accountability to the profession

10

Ability to Deliver

• Commitment of resources

• Development of leaders

• Teambuilding

• Training in resource management

• Training in public health tasks

• No hierarchy → matrix organisation

• Right people, right skills, right time

11

Roles of PC Team

• Re-examination of the role of the GP

• GPs cannot control and do all key tasks

• Re-examine the professional & clinical roles of:– Manager

– Nurse

– Pharmacist

– Psychologists

• Link public service values + private sector initiatives

12

13

Diversity & Quality

• Grow your own vision• Build upon skills and motivation• Develop new roles• Encourage innovative partnerships (voluntary sector, private

sector, community, academic departments)• Addressing poor quality; monitor through:

• Organisational development• Investment• Audit• Performance monitoring • Professional assessment• Retraining

14

Managing Demand

• One, if not the, most critical elements

• In the absence of DM, service development is irresponsible

• Increased demand due to:

– Consumer expectations

– Patient mobility

– Increasing complex problems

– Ageing population

– Advances in drugs & technology

• Address capacity issues innovatively & responsively

• Prevents service inadequacies

15

Suggestions for Demand Management

• Patient education initiatives

• Non-doctors doing medical role

• Training GPs in risk management

• Training in teamwork development

• Audit of referrals / consultations w/ peers

• Timely patient information (minorities, new patients)

• Use volunteers and/or carers

• Control through monitoring & policy

16

Education & Training in PC

What are we doing now? What do we want to be doing…and how shall we get there?

• Skilling

• Teambuilding

• Monitoring

• Training & development

Quality Integration

Choice

Costs

Change Organisational Behaviours

Change Physicians’ Behaviours

18

Evaluation of Effectiveness in Primary Care

• Explicit responsibility for decision making– Baseline measures specific to time and place

– Consider objectives of stakeholders

• Better partnerships with other organisations– Community

– Social services

– Psychiatry

– Geriatrics

– Voluntary

– Private

19

Evaluation of Effectiveness in Primary Care

• Value for money– *Key issue– Compare transaction costs– Measure need & patient outcome (but v. difficult)

• Responses to population need• Accountability to management & patient• Efficient provision of appropriate care• Evidence-based interventions• Management of demand• Equity of health care delivery• Sustainability and stability of systems• Staff retention & recruitment

20

Conclusion

• Colossal agenda but real opportunity• Focus on ‘appropriateness’ to estb. good practice

– Effectiveness of interventions– Efficiency– Patient acceptability– Clinical experience– Right people, right skills, right time

• Public Health skills crucial• Managerial experience crucial• User input crucial • Clear responsibilities, particularly budgetary• Clear objectives• Robust evaluation• Sense of mutual respect for all professions working in primary and community care

21

22

References

• Carruthers I. (1994) Total fundholding in the mainstream of the NHS. Primary Care Management. 4: 7-9.

• Fry J, Light D and Rodnick J. (1995) Reviving Primary Care: a US – UK comparison. 118-40. Radcliffe Medical Press, Oxford.

• Littlejohns P, Victor C. (1996) Making Sense of a Primary Care-led Health Service.14-28. Radcliffe Medical Press, Oxford.

• Starfield B. (1992) Primary Care: concept, evaluation and policy. Oxford University Press, New York.

23

Shukran JazeelanShukran Jazeelan

Elizabeth A. DuboisElizabeth A. DuboisWandsworth Teaching PCT, LondonWandsworth Teaching PCT, London