7 P.M. - Suamico Village Board Packet.pdf2016/05/02 · Request by Daniel Gokey to modify the conditional use permit on parcels SU -40-4 & 40-5 to increase the allowable size ofthe

SUAMICO VILLAGE BOARD MEETING — AGENDA

12781 VELP AVENUE

Monday, May 2, 2016 7 P.M.

1) CALL MEETING TO ORDER

2) APPROVE AGENDA

3) PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

4) CITIZEN COMMENTS ON AGENDA ITEMS

5) PUBLIC FORUM

Issues brought before the Board for which no decision shall be made

6) CONSENT AGENDA

a) Previous Minutes of the Village Board: April 4 & April 18, 2016

b) Licenses as recommended by Officers Kowalkowski and Raska: 1.) Operator Approvals: Matthew R. Purtell Brittney M. Rankel, Kaitlyn M.

Caipenedo, Misty M. Oremus, Amanda E. Hennes, Mallory M. Mayer, DavidV. Wickert and Laurie A. Cavanaugh -Miller.

Operator denials: None

2.) Picnic Licenses: HSYSA for May 21 & May 22, 2016; HSYSA for July 22 - July 24, 2016; both for Calavera Park. SS Edward & Isadore Parish for

Harvest Fest, August 21, 2016. NEW Zoo & Adventure Park for Brew at the

Zoo, June 16, 2016.

7) ADMINISTRATIVE ITEMS

a) Ceremonial Oath of Office given by Judge Rathburn for the following: 1.) Village Trustees: Michael Schneider and Sky VanRossum2.) Fire Chief. Troy Noe3.) Assistant Fire Chiefs: Jerry VanDenPlaus- Operational; Joe Bertler-

Operational; Chris Gabryszek- Administrative

b) Commission and Committee Appointments, Weed Commissioner Appointmentc) Confidentiality Ordinance 2016- 07 an Ordinance Relating to Confidentiality of

Income and Expenses Provided to Assessor for Assessment Purposes, 2nd readingd) Application/Approval of a Class `B" License for the sale of fermented beverages

for HSYSA

e) Discussion/Action on Resolution 16007 a Resolution Authorizing Steve Kubackito Act on Behalf of the Village of Suamico Regarding the Knowles -NelsonStewardship Grant Application

f) Administrator' s Report

1.) Vickery Village Phase 1 Project -Status Report -1St Work Efforts

2.) Village of Suamico Fire Department -Job Description Review -Captains

Positions -Organizational Structure Review -Status Report

3.) Norfield Road Wetland Mitigation Bank -Report on Work Efforts -Status

Report

4.) Whispering Ridge Subdivision -Trial Maintenance/ Enhancement Efforts for2017 -Heads up on Work Efforts and Plans

5.) Vickery Village Improvement Project -Phase 2 -Status Report -Communicationfrom WDOT-Status Update

6.) Any and all Other Items that may be Germaneg) Sunset Beach Discussion/Direction to Staff

8) UTILITY & PUBLIC WORKS ITEMS

a) 2017 County Bridge Aid Contribution

b) Amendments to Chapter 10 Storm Water, Ordinance 2016- 08 Amending Chapter10 Storm Water

9) PLANNING/ZONING ITEMS

a) Approval of following: 1.) Request by Daniel Gokey to modify the conditional use permit on parcels

SU -40-4 & 40- 5 to increase the allowable size of the commercial structure

from 3, 600sq ft to 5, 250 sq ft. Located on the east side of Velp Aveapproximately 500 ft. south of Brown Rd.

2.) Request by Julie Voight 438 Fawnwood Ct., Wrightstown, WI 54180 forapproval of a 4 -lot Certified Survey Map, as prepared by Dave Chrouser, Mau

Associates, on parcel SU -98- 2. Located on the west side of Pine Ln & on

the south side of Lost Creek Ln. Zoned RR

3.) Request by North Shore Bank, 1838 Cardinal Ln for a PDD amendment asprepared by Joel Ehrfurth, Mach IV Engineering, to allow better egress fromthe drive thru lanes. Located on the northeast corner of Linville Rd &

Cardinal Ln.

10) DISCUSSION ON FUTURE AGENDA ITEM(S)

11) CLOSED SESSION

a) 19. 85( 1)( e) Deliberating or negotiating the purchasing of public properties, theinvesting of public funds, or conducting other specified public business, whenevercompetitive or bargaining reasons require a closed session. 1.) Acquisition of Property2.) Negotiating Utility Agreements

12) RETURN TO OPEN SESSION (IF NEEDED)

13) POSSIBLE ACTION ON CLOSED SESSION ITEMS

14) ADJOURN

Patricia Gaura= elen, Village President

Note: A majority of members of the Fire Commission may be in attendance forinformation gathering and sharing.

Any person wishing to attend who, because of a disability, requires specialaccommodations should contact the Suamico Village office at ( 920) 434-2212 with as

much advanced notice as possible so that accommodations can be made.

2

SUAMICO VILLAGE BOARD MEETING MINUTES

Monday, April 4, 2016

Page 11

C11'


Meeting was called to order at 6: 00 P. M. by President Jelen. Board members present: President Jelen, Trustee Andrews, Trustee Eckert,

Trustee Nelson, Trustee Roddan and Trustee Van Rossum

Staff present: Administrator Kubacki; Dan Drewery, DPW Director; Kay Magyar, Finance Director; Steve Dunks, Zoning Administrator/Building Inspector; DEOKowalkowski, Fire Chief Noe and Jean DeBauche.

2) APPROVE AGENDA

Motion was made by Roddan to approve the agenda; second by VanRossum, motioncarried 6- 0.


4) CLOSED SESSION

a) 19. 85( 1)( c) Considering employment, promotion, compensation orperformance evaluation data of any public employee over which thegovernmental body has jurisdiction or exercises responsibility. i) Employee Evaluation -Non Represented & Represented

b) 19. 85( 1)( e) Deliberating or negotiating the purchasing of public properties, the investing of public funds, or conducting other specified public business, whenever competitive or bargaining reasons require a closed session. i) Acquisition of Propertyii) Norfield Mitigation Property

Motion by Nelson to move into closed session per 19. 85( 1)( c) and 19. 85( 1)( e) todiscuss the items listed above and to include Administrator Kubacki, second byVanRossum,

Roll Call Vote:

Andrews — aye

Eckert — aye

Nelson — aye

Jelen — aye

Roddan - aye

Van Rossum — aye

Motion carried 6- 0.

5) RETURN TO OPEN SESSION

Motion by Roddan to return to open session, second by VanRossum, Roll Call Vote:

Andrews — aye

Eckert — aye

Nelson — aye

Village Board Minutes, 04/ 04/ 2016

Page 12

Jelen — aye

Roddan - aye

Van Rossum — aye



None

7) PUBLIC FORUM

None

8) PUBLIC HEARINGS AND ACTION 7 PM

a) Request by Pete & Connie DeWindt, 13613 Velp Ave., Suamico, WI 54173for a Conditional Use permit to allow a duplex at 13611 & 13 613 Velp Ave. SU -1004-N-112, zoned Rural Residential - located north of School Lane on

the west side of Velp Ave. about 210 ft. north of Coach Ln. Staff Report:

A conditional Use to allow a duplex to be constructed was approved in 1994.

The 3 conditions of that approval all referenced ownership and use by thoseasking for the Conditional Use. Catherine Garrits did pass away in Decemberof 2013. The 2nd unit has been vacant since her passing. This is a 1, 800 sq. ft., 3 bedroom, 2 bath unit. The occupied unit is over 2, 100sq. ft. It does not seem reasonable to expect to combine these two units intoone single family home. There is a conditional use on this parcel for Pete' s Taxidermy (Approved in1999). Approval of a Conditional Use for the Duplex would not need to affect

anything with -in that Conditional Use. There are a few duplex' s along Velp Ave to the south. None that would causeissues with Village separation requirements.

The private sanitary system is up to standards with Brown County. It is alsoon a private well.

President Jelen opened the meeting up for public hearing and no one spoke; hearing was closed. Motion was made by Trustee Van Rossum to approve the conditional use permitfor Pete and Connie DeWindt to allow full use at 13611 & 13 613 Velp Ave. SU - 1004 -N-112 as a duplex; second by Trustee Andrews. Motion carried 5- 1, nay Eckert.

b) Request by Wade T & Maria L. Micoley, 3035 Brookhills Place, Suamico, WI 54313 for the following; i) Preliminary Plat approval for Anston Road Estates, A County Plat

Staff Report:

The property has N. Brookhills Drive which dead ends on the northern side ofthe property. N. Brookhills was intended to extend through this property, connecting to Brookhills Drive on the southern end. With a stream, wetlands

the ESA' s present it would be difficult to complete this road. Completion of

the road would also not create any substantial gain in lots. Staff believes the

Village Board Minutes, 04/ 04/2016

Page 13

minimal gain in lots would not be worth the additional 1, 300+ ft. of road that

would be created.

The northern portion of the 38+ acres will be divided after official wetland

delineation can be submitted for approval.

The plat would create 8 lots, all meeting the 2 acre requirement with 164+ ftof frontage on Anston Road.

A storm water plan will be required to be submitted and approved as part of

the final plat.

All lots will be served by private sewer & wells. It is well outside of the sewer

service area.

No additional roads would be constructed.

Because the land is zoned AG -FP, the following needs to be addressed as partof the rezone

o The rezoned land is better suited for a use not allowed in the farmland

preservation zoning district. This land is fully wooded and has not beenpart of an active farm for many years. Single family, large lot homeswould not be a permitted use under our AG -FP zoning.

o The rezoning is consistent with the current adopted comp plan. The compplan shows this area as future rural residential

o The rezoning is substantially consistent with the current certified BrownCounty Farmland Preservation Plan. The rezoning of this single 40 acreparcel does not substantially change the Brown County Plan. It will notcreate any additional " Island" effect to the plan.

o The rezoning will not substantially impair or limit current or futureagricultural use of other protected farmland. The location of this parcel

does not affect use or access to any adjacent AG -FP zoned properties. Theonly adjacent property zoned AG -FP is also mainly wooded lands. Thereare no current Ag uses on the adjacent properties.

President Jelen opened the meeting up for public hearing and no one spoke; hearing was closed.

Motion was made by Trustee Roddan to approve the preliminary plat, AnstonRoad Estates A County Plat, with the following conditions;

a. Final Plat will require an approved storm water plan

b. Approval of a rezone from AG -FP to RR

c. Meet the requirements of all other applicable ordinances, regulations and

reviewing agencies

Second by Trustee Andrews, Motion carried 6- 0.

Motion was made by Trustee Roddan to approve ordinance 2016- 06, the rezoningof SU -394 from AG -FP to RR; second by Trustee Andrews. Andrews — aye

Eckert — aye

Nelson — aye

Jelen — aye

Roddan — aye


Page 14

Van Rossum — aye


9) CONSENT AGENDA

a) Previous Minutes of the Village Board: March 21, 2016

b) Licenses as recommended by Officers Kowalkowski and Raska: i) Operator approvals: Gerri L. Cobbins, Joshua S. Seymour, Alayna M.

Burch,

Andie J. Goral, Ruth M. Stein & Ashley R. Peaseii) Operator denials: None

Motion was made by Trustee Roddan to approve the consent agenda; second byTrustee Nelson.



a) Discussion/Action, Ordinance 2016- 03 Amending Chapter 11. 42 CarryingFirearm in a Public Building (second reading)

Officer Kowalkowski spoke:

At a prior meeting, when going through the first reading, a question came up thathe wasn' t able to answer as it applied more to the policy of the employees. Attorney Kimps was in attendance at this meeting to address questions. Trustee Eckert asked a question on the wording of the ordinance. Kowalkowski: 11. 42(2) —there are still areas in public buildings that are

prohibited. In this building it would be the police area and the municipal courtwhen it is in session.

VanRossum: our current policy states that we don' t allow employees to carryweapons in Suamico village vehicles, correct?

Officer Kowalkowski stated that it is correct.

Anderson: asked to clarify knives and how it all plays in effectKowalkowski: explained that the current ordinance covers firearms and other

dangerous weapons, so what would be done by lifting restriction on this secondreading is opening that up where people could early knives or any other weapon. Nelson: did address everyone from a constitutional point of view:

This nation has come far and there has been extensive litigation reaching up to theSupreme Court throughout history since the founding of this great nation anddrew attention to two highly significant and very relevant cases in recent times; both of these cases were rulings from the United States Supreme Court recent

attention to recent cases.

Motion was made by Trustee Roddan to approve Ordinance 2016- 03 amendingChapter 11. 42 Carrying Firearms in a Public Building, second by Trustee Nelson, Roll Call Vote:

Andrews — nay

Eckert — aye

Nelson — aye

Jelen — aye

Roddan - aye

Van Rossum — nayMotion carried 4- 2.


Page 15

Trustee Van Rossum stated for the record:

Thinks this board has a responsibility as an elected official to maintain a villagehall where all citizens that come here can share ideas in an environment that theysee as non -threatening. When we made the vote that we made tonight, we choseto go against that. There are going to be those who are going to look at this as Ido as a much more threatening place than it was yesterday. The simple fact is thatby making this vote we' ve condoned concealed weapons that some people aregoing to see as threatening and that means that there are citizens here who in alllikelihood will have less propensity to come here and share those ideas. So Ithink just that is something for us to think about. I respect the vote of the boardand I appreciate the comments you shared with us and I thank everybody.

b) Discussion/Action on Personnel Policy regarding Concealed CarryStaff Report:

Kowalkowski: Staff was asked to look at a personnel policy for villageemployees. The current policy that is in place now prohibits any employee fromcarrying a gun or any other dangerous weapon during the course of theiremployment; basically during work hours or any employee vehicle or building. When the Act was covered to allow concealed carry the Department ofAdministration solicited help from the Department of Justice and the AttorneyGeneral' s office to come up with a policy for state employees. We looked at thatand it looked like the best policy. It covered all the language and such to where aperson legally to carry a CCW would be allowed to carry it in the village. It setparameters where they can notify the employer, basically plagiarize the stateforms that they would inform the employer. If an employee would go into abusiness that is posted no weapons; they have the means to secure it. We areconfident it would suit well with the Village of Suamico.

Attorney Kimps is here tonight to answer questions. What follows are highpoints of the discussion held.

Eckert: Is it the employee' s right to be able to keep their concealed carry asecret?

Kimps: It is not a defined right to keep it secret and at this time my research hasbeen that is not a defined right. There are some loopholes within the act or some

areas within the act, and what my research defined to me was that it is not awritten law, that they have the availability to keep that secret.

Eckert: What if protection is needed from your supervisor?

Kimps: The right of protection is there and the village has the ability to allowpeople to have to carry, unless it is going to be in there vehicle. There is limitedlaw in this area from the standpoint that most municipalities have just elected to

not allow it. My research has been that they don' t allow employees to carry andso there are not a lot of cases out there and have not been a lot of changes to thelaw based on that.


Page 16

Kowalkowski: Would strongly suggest they you would provide a means for themto secure it.

Jelen: Other than just tucking it under the seat or locking it?

Kowalkowski: I would say yes. Again, it could come to the liability issues, thingsdo happen.

Attorney. Imps: In talking with people from the town' s association and I talkedto other municipalities, some larger municipalities, the basic premise in many ofthem has been is that they do not allow employees to carry. I was unable to find amunicipality that allows their employees to carry.

Kowalkowski: I don' t have a stake here, I' m a county employee. It is your villageemployees. There are some village employees who are uncomfortable that there

are going to weapons in the building and I think by providing those lock boxesyou are providing a sense, close to what Trustee Van Rossum said, you' reproviding a sense of security.

Jelen: Concealed means it is on your person and so nobody knows you have it.

Kowalkowski: There may be times where they may want to take that weapon offlike we do. There may be times in your village where your DPW workers or yourutility guys will have to take that weapon off. I would strongly suggest that youprovide a place to secure them. You don' t have to. There is nothing in the statelaw that says you have to. I think you have a duty to your employees that aren' tcarrying it to provide that. It is not a big expense. Basically they have the meansto put it in a box. That is part of your duty again as village officials is to provideyour employees with a policy and procedure where you' re allowing them to dosomething but then there are some restrictions that you have to make them awareof. There are consequences if you violate the policy whether it is intentional orwhatever.

Jelen: OK. I see this as being some different issues that we are talking about. Employees in a Suamico vehicle and/ or in a village building. First of all if we' relooking at employees in this building if they conceal carry; so that means that gunis on them and it' s concealed, so nobody here would know they even have it. If itis their choice that they would want to remove that gun from their person and hideit in their desk or something. Is that where you are saying we should have a lockbox?

Kowalkowski: You need to have a means of securing it. It is a safety thing, moretoward safety then something that is required under state law or anything else

Jelen: Do the desk drawers lock?

Kubacki: Not all of them. Some of them do.


Page 17

Jelen: So we would have the ability to put locks on desks and provide peoplewith keys if necessary.

Kubacki: Sure you could do that.

I' m not in favor in having the employees with concealed carry. There have beenmany times where there are situations that develop that are related to personnelthat get highly contentious. I would prefer not to be placed in that situation whereI would not know whether a person is armed or not. I have to deal with the

environment in many different manners her and for a manager not to know if anemployee is carrying a concealed weapon. If you do allow that to happen in thismunicipality and there have been no other municipalities that Corey has been ableto determine that allow that. We need to have number one secured areas and we

need to have notification. That is simple as that. If you survey the employees inthis building I think you would find the majority of them that would not wantemployees in here to conceal carry.

Kowalkowski: You can restrict where they can and can' t.

Nelson: I wholeheartedly agree that the weapon should be secured if someone isgoing to carry. I understand we as the village are allowing the employee to carrybut would there be anything to prevent us from saying look if you as theemployee are going to carry you as the employee have to provide some assuranceto us that you have at your expense you' re going to provide the lockbox.

Kimps: We would have to determine whether or not they would have to incur acost related to their employment that would fall under employment type of law I

think.

Roddan: Ifwe allow employees to carry, put stipulation in the policy,

This will need to be sent back to Health & Safety for their recommendations.

Motion was made by Trustee Roddan to defer 10 B back to Health & SafetyCommittee for further discussion with input from tonight' s meeting; second byTrustee Eckert.

5- 1, motion carried, nay by Van Rossum

c) Ordinance 2016- 05, An Ordinance Allowing the Village Clerk Discretion inElection Official Work Hours ( second reading) STAFF REPORT:

It has come to our attention that some of our election/poll workers would like to work

split shifts on election day. According to the Election Administration Manual, amunicipality is allowed to do this if they pass an ordinance allowing the village clerkthe discretion to hire election officials to work less than a full day on the day of theelection. Some ofthe election workers may want to work part of the day as they haveanother commitment or it could be just too long of a day.


Page 18

Motion was made by Trustee Nelson to approve Ordinance 2016- 05 an ordinanceamending Chapter 2. 11 Elections, allowing the village clerk discretion in electionofficial work hours.

Roll Call Vote:

Andrews — aye

Eckert — aye

Nelson — aye

Jelen — aye

Roddan - aye

Van Rossum — aye

Second by Trustee EckertMotion carried 6- 0.

d) Vickery Village Planning/Design Engineering -Phase 1 Authorization, Phase1, 2 & 3 Presentation

The Vickery Village infrastructure improvement program has been underdiscussion for many years. We would like to proceed with Phase 1 of the VickeryVillage improvement project and that would involve parking lot number 1, stormsewer construction and a pathway from parking lot 1 to the Vickery Village area. We are asking for the authorization to proceed with phase 1, the engineeringdesign subject to the creation and the Village Board approval of a developer' s

agreement with all adjacent and impacted property owners, Jamie Whiting, JerryHenry and the Village of Suamico. Scott Flaeschel., 1201 Riverside Drive/Alpa Senior Concept: like the looks of the

entire plan. This is something that we can actually end up with and be goodlooking and be good for the village. We need parking out here in this area. Jerry Kapla, 12619 Velp Avenue, (owns Suamico Garage): People do park in

front of my doors; have had to put up signs; do get wrecker calls and can' t getinto the garage and then out to the call. Parking is a problem in this area. Motion was made by Trustee Roddan to direct staff to move forward with Phase 1work efforts as indicated on our sheet, A, B & C plus or minus $298, 487.00;

creation of the Developer' s Agreement with the interested parties and bringing itback to the Village Board for approval; second by Trustee Van Rossum. Motion carried 6- 0.

e) Norfield Road Mitigation Bank Work Effort/CulTent/Future-Process Approval

Motion was made by Trustee Van Rossum to have Trustee Nelson to chair thisitem; second by Dan Roddan. Motion carried 5- 1.

President Jelen abstained.

Motion was made by Trustee Van Rossum that the Village of Suamico be namedthe lead agency and undertake all planning, design and construction efforts andcosts; all other benefitting owners will reimburse the Village of Suamico throughprorated revenue contributions noting that this revenue will offset expendituresallocated to their properties and participation in this project; second by TrusteeRoddan.

Motion passed 4- 1.

Nay — Trustee Eckert


Page 19

President Jelen abstained.

Motion was made by Trustee Van Rossum that the Village of Suamico engagetheir attorney and direct staff to engage with the participants with the wetlandmitigation; begin the process of wetland mitigation agreements, creating wetlandmitigation developer agreements, second by Trustee Roddan. Motion carried 4- 1.

Nay — Trustee Eckert

Jelen abstained

f) Administrator' s Report

i) Lineville Road Signage Update/ Village Wide Way Finding Sign UpdateTrustee Roddan created a rendering of a sign for the board andAdministrator Kubacki will take it to Orde.

ii) Residential Subdivision Stimulation Update

Meeting with Shore West tomorrow to discuss options and what mightbe available.

Continuing to talk to some of the property owners and talk to themabout some of the developer agreements

Working on the developer agreements. iii) Road Improvement Requirements -Specification Requirements -Update

Looking at specification requirements and bringing them to the department ofpublic works and have been working with staff on that. iv) Other Items that may be Germane

11) DISCUSSION ON FUTURE AGENDA ITEM(S)

Move forward in selling used signs.

12) CLOSED SESSION -CONTINUATION FROM 6 PM SESSION (IF

NEEDED)

a) 19. 85( 1)( c) Considering employment, promotion, compensation orperformance evaluation data of any public employee over which thegovernmental body has jurisdiction or exercises responsibility. i) Employee Evaluation -Non Represented & Represented

b) 19. 85( 1)( e) Deliberating or negotiating the purchasing of public properties, the investing of public funds, or conducting other specified public business, whenever competitive or bargaining reasons require a closed session. i) Acquisition of Propertyii) Norfield Mitigation Property

Motion was made by Trustee Roddan to go into closed session; second by TrusteeVan Rossum.

Roll Call Vote:

Andrews — aye

Eckert — aye

Nelson — aye

Jelen — aye

Roddan - aye


Page 110

Van Rossum – aye


13) RETURN TO OPEN SESSION (IF NEEDED)

Motion by Roddan to return to open session, second by Jelen, Roll Call Vote:

Van Rossum— aye

Roddan— aye

Jelen— aye

Nelson— aye

Eckert— aye

Andrews— aye


14) POSSIBLE ACTION ON CLOSED SESSION ITEMS

Action on Employee Evaluation -Non Represented & Represented

Motion by Nelson to approve the 2016 Salary Modifications as identified below, second by Jelen, motion carried 5- 1, nay by Eckert.

1. BI/Zoning Administrator- Steve Dunks- 2/ 5% increase - $ 66, 172

2. Finance Director -Kay Magyar -2. 0% increase -$81, 125

3. Village Clerk -Bonnie Swan -4% increase -$57,200

4. Parks & Recreation Director -1. 5% increase -$52,780

5. Director of PW -Dan Drewery-$70, 000

6. Deputy Director of Public Works -Andy Smits-- 4%-$ 58, 240

7. Deputy Treasurer -Mary Schuyltz-2%-$ 51, 151

Represented Employees – DPW & Clerical -2%

Effective 01/ 01/ 2016

15) ADJOURN

Motion was made by Jelen to adjourn at 10: 05 PM, second by VanRossum, motion carried 6- 0.

Respectfully submitted,

Jean DeBauche, Recording Secretary


SUAMICO VILLAGE BOARD MEETING MINUTES

12781 VELP AVENUE

Monday, April 18, 2016

Page 11

7 P. M.


President Jelen called the meeting to order at 7: 00 P.M. Board members present: President Jelen, Trustee Andrews, Trustee Eckert, Trustee

Nelson, and Trustee Roddan and Trustee VanRossum.

Staff present: Administrator Kubacki; Dan Drewery, DPW Director; Kay Magyar, Finance Director; Steve Dunks, Zoning Administrator/Building Inspector; Fire ChiefNoe and Bonnie Swan, Village Clerk.

2) APPROVE AGENDA

Motion by Roddan to approve the agenda as presented, second by Nelson, motioncarried 6- 0.



No one was present.

5) PUBLIC FORUM

Issues brought before the Board for which no decision shall be made

President Jelen spoke of a letter that was received addressed to her and the BuildingInspection Department regarding an issue on a decision that was done at the lastmeeting. It is regarding an inspection issue and the department is already lookinginto it. This letter was not signed therefore they cannot be contacted for further input.

6) CONSENT AGENDA

a) Treasurer' s Report

b) FD Report

c) Licenses as recommended by Officers Kowalkowski and Raska: i) Operator approvals: None

ii) Operator denials: None

Motion by VanRossum to approve the consent agenda as presented, second byEckert, motion carried 6- 0.


a) Confidentiality Ordinance 2016- 07 an Ordinance Relating to Confidentiality ofIncome and Expenses Provided to Assessor for Assessment Purposes

Staff Report:

During the assessment process when income information is requested of theassessor, from an outside source, we need to have an ordinance in place to

legally protect those records. This is the first reading. No motion at this time.


Page 12

b) Board of Review TrainingStaff Report:

President Jelen and Trustee Nelson have the necessary training to meet the staterequirements for this BOR. In the past the board has chosen to hold a BOR

training so all members were up to speed on the process for BOR.

We did discuss this at the Village Board meeting of March 7th when we set thedate for the Board of Review. I need to know if anyone would like to take the

training and I will go ahead and order the materials needed. I will schedule that

for 3: 30 pm before the 6: 00 pm start of the BOR.

c) Administrator' s Report

i) Items that may be Germane1) Bonding for Subdivision developments2) Wetland Mitigation

3) Developers agreement for parking lot area TIF 24) Fire Department Appointments

5) Shipyard Marina

6) Room Tax Meeting7) Concealed Carry Employee Policy8) Village of Suamico Welcome Signs

a) Drawings distributed were reviewed

8) DISCUSSION ON FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS)

Yard Waste Sight

9) ADJOURN

Motion by Roddan to adjourn at 7: 29 PM, second by Nelson, motion carried 6- 0.

Respectfully submitted,

Bonnie Swan, Village Clerk


Memo

To: Bonnie Swan, Village Clerk

From: Deputy Justin Raska # 1314

Date: 4/ 27/2016

Re: Operator's License applications

I have reviewed all available paperwork and completed a background check on the

applications for an operator's licenses. Files accessed include Wisconsin Crime

Information Bureau (CIB), Wisconsin Circuit Court Access (CCAP), and local files.

I respectfully recommend that the Village Board approve these applications:

Matthew R. Purtell

Brittney M. Rankel

Kaitlyn M. Carpenedo

Misty M. Oremus

Amanda E. Hennes

Mallory M. Mayer

David V. Wickert

Laurie A. Cavanaugh -Miller

If you have any further questions, please contact me.

Sincerely,

w" f

Deputy Justin Raska # 1314

Directed Enforcement Officer

Village of Suamico

Brown County Sheriffs Office

r


From: Jim Kowalkowski

Date: 04/25/ 16

Re: St. Edward & Isadore Parish (Harvest Fest)(August 21, 2016)

I have reviewed all available paperwork and I completed a background check on the

application for a temporary Class " B" license. I recommend that the Board approve

this application for the license based on the information provided.


Sincerely,

Jim Kowalkowski



Date: 04125116

Re. Howard/Suamico Youth Sports (Calavera Park: May 21 & May 22, 2016)



this application for the license based on the information provided to be used at

Calavera Park for the HSYSA baseball tournament.


Sincerely,

Jim Kowalkowski

Memo



Date: 04125/ 16

Re. Howard/Suamico Youth Sports (Calavera Park: July 22 - July 24, 2016)

1 have reviewed all available paperwork and I completed a background check on the

application for a temporary Class " B" license. 1 recommend that the Board approve

this application for the license based on the information provided to be used at

Calavera Park for the HSYSA baseball tournament.


Sincerely,

Jim Kowalkowski

Memo



Date: 04/28/ 16

Re: NEW Zoo & Adventure Park (Brew at the Zoo) (June 16, 2016)



this application for the license based on the information provided.


Sincerely,

Jim Kowalkowski

V age o

J ,

TO: VILLAGE BOARD

FROM: BONNIE SWAN

SUBJECT: COMMITTEE & COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS

DATE: APRIL 27, 2016

The Committee and Commission appoints will be submitted at Monday night' smeeting.

Weed Commissioner Dan Drewery 1 year term

lb

1i Ca, L3

TO: VILLAGE BOARD

FROM: BONNIE SWAN

SUBJECT: ORDINANCE 2016- 07


Ordinance 2016- 07 is an Ordinance Relating to Confidentiality of Income andExpenses Provided to the Assessor for Assessment Purposes.

During the assessment process when income information is requested of theassessor, from an outside source, we need to have an ordinance in

place to legally protect those records.

I have spoken with our assessor, Mike Denor, and he is in favor of having thisordinance in effect.

RECOMMENDATION: To approve Ordinance 2016-07 an Ordinance

relating to Confidentiality of Income and Expenses Provided to theAssessor for Assessment Purposes.

Ordinance 2016-07

Ordinances Relating to Confidentiality of Income and Expenses Provided toAssessor for Assessment Purposes

The Village Board of The Village of Suamico, Brown County, Wisconsin DoesOrdain as Follows:

Chapter 2. 08 ( 7) ( e) as follows:

1. Adoption. This ordinance adopts by reference Wis. Statutes § 70.47 ( 7)( af). Income

and expense information provided by a property owner to an assessor for the purposes ofestablishing the valuation for assessment purposes by the income method of valuationshall be confidential and not a public record open to inspection or copying under § 19. 35

1) of Wis. Statutes.

2. Exceptions. An officer may make disclosure of such information under the followingcircumstances:

a. The assessor has access to such information in the performance ofhis/her duties;

b. The board of review may review such information when needed, in its' opinion, to decide upon a contested assessment;

c. Another person or body has the right to review such information due to theintimate relationship to the duties of an office or as set by law;

d. The officer is complying with a court order; e. The person providing the income and expense information has contested the

assessment level at either the board of review or by filing a claim for excessiveassessment under § 74.37, in which case the base records are open and public.

3. Severability. The several sections of this ordinance are declared to be severable. If

any section or portion thereof shall be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to beinvalid, unlawful or unenforceable, such decision shall apply only to the specific sectionor portion thereof directly specified in the decision, and shall not affect the validity of anyother provisions, sections, or portions thereof of the ordinance. The remainder of the

ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. Any other ordinances whose terms are inconflict with the provisions of this ordinance are hereby repealed as to those terms thatconflict.

4. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon passage andposting (or publication) as provided by law.

Adopted this 2nd day of May, 2016.

Attest:


Patricia Gaura Jelen, Village President

Page 1 of 2

Eckert

Nelson

Roddan

Andrews

Date Posted:

Schneider

Jelen

VanRossum

Page 2 of 2

Vdave Qfa sI

TO: VILLAGE BOARD

FROM: BONNIE SWAN

SUBJECT: HSYSA


The Howard Suamico Youth Sports Association has requested to sell beer

during games for the summer at the Idlewild concession stand. Nikki

and I have discussed the following options to them: 1) Apply for picnic licenses for each date they will be selling or2) Apply for a Class `B" Beer license that will cover a 6 month period for

the Idlewild concession stand. If they choose this option, no one elsecan sell from that stand over the 6 month period.

They have chosen to apply for the 6 month Class `B" Beer license.

Recommendation: To approve the Class " B" Beer license for HSYSA for the

Idlelwild Concession stand located in Idlewild Park for a period of 6

months starting May 2, 2016 -November 2, 2016.

VILLAGE BOARD MEETING -5/ 2/ 2016

1 Go:!, 1

1111 We ,,,. i

BOARDTHEVILLAGE HAS ALREADYAPPROVEDPHASE 1, •

PARKING/ 1 ,. THE ENTIRE

AREA AND THE PATH FROMPARKING LOT1 THE VICKERY VILLAGE

CHIVES AREA.

ROADWAY PHASE RIVERSIDE 1'' L, r i •

LANDSCAPING, ': & GUTTER AND BE ' A'' STP -

URBAN, PROJECT AND PHASE 3 WHICH IS THE VICKERY

VILLAGE

Ing

THIS WORK WOULD BE FUNDED AT 50%, SHOULD IT BE APPROVED.

YOU 1 i MAP IDENTIFYING THE LOCATIONOF THE PROJECT,

ESTIMATEDITSCOSTS, OF SUPPORTFROM BROWN COUNTY,

ALPHA CONCEPTS AND THE VICKERY VILLAGE ASSOCIATION, ALONG

WITH RESOLUTION • 11

110M 010101010rlivt It"

UNDERTAKENITIS EXPECTED THAT PHASE 2' S PLANNING AND DESIGN WILL BE

2017, SO THAT ." SHOVEL READY"

PROJECT IN 201R;. 1 8 EARLIEST DATE iSTP-URBAN FUDNING 1

BE AVAILABLE.

RESOLUTION 16007

A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING STEVE KUBACKI TO ACT ON BEHALF OF THE

VILLAGE OF SUAMICO REGARDING

THE KNOWLES-NELSON STEWARDSHIP GRANT APPLICATION

The Board ofTrustees of the Village Board ofSuamico do resolve asfollows:

WHEREAS, the Village of Suamico is interested in developing lands for public outdoor recreationpurposes as described in the application; and .

WHEREAS, financial aid is required to carry out the project;

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Village of Suamico has budgeted a sum sufficient to

complete the project and hereby authorizes Steve Kubacki, Village Administrator to act on behalf of theVillage of Suamico to:

Submit an application to the State of Wisconsin Department ofNatural Resources for any

financial aid that may be available;

Submit reimbursement claims along with necessary supporting documentation within six (6) moths ofproject completion date;

Submit signed documents; and

Take necessary action to undertake, direct and complete the approved project.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Village of Suamico will comply with state or federal rules for

the programs; may perform force account work; will maintain the completed project in an attractive, inviting and safe manner; will keep the facilities open to the general public during reasonable hoursconsistent with the type of facility; and will obtain from the State ofWisconsin Department ofNaturalResources or the National Park Service approval in writing before any change is made in the use of theproject site.

Adopted this day of , 2016.

Patricia Gaura Jelen, Village President


Vote: Aye

NayAbstain

Absent

PARK DEPARTMENT

CphOWtn ecltalfq1150 BELLEVUE STREET, RM 151

GREEN BAY, WI 54302

PHONE ( 920) 448-4464 FAX (920)448-4054

E- MAIL KRIESE_MM@CO. BROWN.WI. US

April 27, 2016

Steve Kubacki

Village of Suamico

12781 Velp AvenueSuamico, WI 54173

Dear Mr. Kubacki;

ASSISTANT PARK DIRECTOR

The Brown County Parks Department operates a large boat launch facility on the Suamico Riverdownstream from Fireman' s Park. During peak use periods in May through August, this boatlaunch facility is very busy. We have evaluated options for expanding the parking area but ouroptions are limited and very expensive.

We support efforts by the Village of Suamico to develop a canoe/ kayak launch facility atFireman' s Park. We anticipate this boat launch facility will reduce demand for non -motorizedlaunching at our boat launch facility during periods of peak use and will result in user endbenefits compared with the current situation. Because of your canoe/ kayak launch project,

Brown County may be able to postpone development of additional parking at our SuamicoRiver boat launch which represents a savings to Brown County and all residents in the area. This is a great example of intergovernmental cooperation!

Good luck in your efforts to secure funding for this project.

Sincerely,

Brown County Parks

e7 ;; j t& CONCH

A new ,beginning in Memory Care

13230 Velp Avenue Suamico, Wl 54173

April 26, 2016

Steve Kubacki

Village of Suamico

12781 Velp AvenueSuamico, WI 54173

Dear Mr. Kubacki;

Alpha Concepts runs a 24 bed elderly care facility located at the corner of Velp Avenue andRiverside Drive. We understand that the Village of Suatnico is working to secure grant funding

to help pay for a pedestrian/ bike path along the Suamico River. This project will be located justnorth and east of our elderly care facility.

We support this project because it will provide safe access for our residents for recreation and

leisure activities. All of our residents are elderly and many have disabilities which limit their

ability to walls.

Good luck in your efforts to secure funding for this project.

Sincerely,

Alpha Concepts

mih

Vickery Village River Path Estimate

1. Crusher Dust— 360 yds @ $ 15/ yd $ 5, 400

2. Asphalt — 240 ton @ $ 80/ ton $ 19,200

3. Excavation — 720 yds @ $ 8/ yd $ 5, 760

4. Restoration ( lump sum) $ 2, 500

5. Lighting Installation —15 lights @ $ 3, 000/ light $ 45, 000

6. Bollards Purchase & Installation —10 Bollards $ 5, 000

7. Kayak/Canoe Launch Pad $ 20,000

8. Total Construction Estimate $ 102, 860

9. 10% Engineering and Contingency $ 10,286

10. 10% Construction Contingency $ 10, 286

11. Total Estimate $ 123, 432

Oi ,

LAn 71

Zk

A

A

j

11wl-

o

i

INksmoomw

r "' NA7

w

771ML -

Al

lk


1. VICKERY VILLAGEPROJECT REPORT/.

EFFOV,TS

611yrllif.'];

EFFORTS/' HEADS

bi

Steven Kubacki

From: Carpenter, Sandra - DOT < [email protected]>

Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2016 10:28 AMTo: Steven Kubacki; Cole Runge ( [email protected])

Cc: ' Liebman, Mike'; ' Pat Jelen'; Dan Drewery; Cavanaugh, Jeanette - DOT; Dorsey, Will - DOT

Subject: Use of Surface Transportation Block Grant funding for construction of Woonerf

Good Morning,

Thank you for your patience as we have researched and discussed your questions regarding a woonerf.

Regarding your question if a woonerf would be eligible for STP -Urban funding:

The FAST Act converts the long-standing Surface Transportation Program into the Surface TransportationBlock Grant Program acknowledging that this program has the most flexible eligibilities among all Federal -aidhighway programs and aligning the program' s name with how FHWA has historically administered it. [ FAST Act

1109( a)]. The STBG promotes flexibility in State and local transportation decisions and provides flexiblefunding to best address State and local transportation needs. http:// www.fhwa. dot.gov/ fastact/ factsheets/ stbgfs.cfm

Per the guidance above, eligibility for projects to receive federal funding is based on the project location. Awoonerf is a technique. So long as the project is eligible, we are not aware of any federal requirement whichwould prohibit the inclusion of this particular technique. In fact woonerfs are discussed in the Federal Highway

Administration University Course on Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation, LESSON 20: TRAFFIC CALMING inwhich a woonerf is identified as an acceptable combination of traffic—calming devices. http:// www.fhwa. dot.gov/ publications/ research/ safety/ pedbike/ 05085/ chapt2O.cfm

However, just because a technique can be used doesn' t mean it' s the most appropriate technique and

should be used. Shared use streets only make sense in certain circumstances. And they differ in design andcharacter, depending on whether you' re talking about a low-volume residential street or a busy intersection inthe middle of town. Key components of shared use streets are VERY low speeds ( i. e. vehicle speed not toexceed walking pace/ 5 miles per hour) and enforcement. Traffic entering a Woonerf must originate fromanother street, not be a continuation of traffic through an area along the corridor. Woonerfs are typicallyconstructed within dense residential or commercial areas.

http:// nacto.org/ wp-content/uploads/""2014/ 10/ Higgins 2014- NACT0- Argyle- HMH- 2- 1. pdfhttp:// www.seattle. gov/ parks/ ProParks/ pro1ects/ 12thAve.htm

Minimum research has revealed that there have been objections to the proposed use of a woonerf by

individuals representing ADA communities, based on a belief that the proposed technique does notaccommodate the needs of individuals with limited or no sight. In reality, this most likely is based on a fearthat this proposed shared access routes for use by pedestrians, bicyclists and vehicles will not in fact result invehicles traveling at a very low speed, and will not in fact result in pedestrians having the dominant role. Therefore, the Village should be prepared to explain how a proposed woonerf will in fact result in the

accommodation of individuals with disabilities. This would include an appropriately designed woonerf, andenforcement of both the low speed and the requirement that vehicle drivers actually do yield to pedestrians.

For federally funded projects, the NEPA process requires that all alternatives need to be evaluated and theimpacts documented. There are many impacts that are required to be documented that are independent ofreal estate needs. Please be aware that a preferred alternative may not be the final approved alternative oncethe NEPA process has been completed.

One option for the Village is to considered funding the design of Riverside Drive with 100% local funds. As part

of the design costs, the Village would pay for WisDOT design review and oversight. This would allow WisDOTto work with the Village and designers as alternatives are considered and evaluated. It would also ensure the

Village has met all FHWA requirements prior to applying for construction funding through the Green Bay MPO. And the amount of construction funding requested would be based on the preferred, approved alternative.

Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions about the information provided above or would liketo discuss things further.

SavvGtySandra D. Carpenter, P. E.

NE Region Local Program Manager

Wisconsin Department of Transportation

944 Vanderperren WayGreen Bay, WI 54304920-492- 5681


STAFF HAS BEEN OBSERVING THE BREAKDOWN OF THE BEACH AT SUNSET BEACH PARK AS A RESULT OF

THE INTENSE WAVE ACTION GENERATED BY THE STRONG NORTHEAST WINDS OFF OF THE BAY OF

GREEN BAY.

A NUMBER OF YEARS AGO, THE VILLAGE HAD REMOVED THE RIP RAP AT THAT LOCATION TO CREATE

BETTER AND SAFER ACCESS TO THE WATERFRONT. NOW WITH MUCH HIGHER WATER LEVELS, MORE

INTENSE EROSION IS OCCURING AT THE SUNSET BEACH PARK SITE.

STAFF IS RESEARCHING WHAT OPTIONS MIGHT BE IMPLEMENTED TO FURTHER PROTECT AND RETAIN

THE BEACH AREA AND WHAT THOSE ASSOCIATED COSTS MIGHT BE. WE HAVE NOT YET COME TO A

SUCCINCT CONCLUSION, BUT WILL BE REPORTING BACK TO THE VILLAGE BOARD IN SHORT ORDER. IN

THE INTERIM, WE WILL BE ABANDONING THE WELL ON THE SITE, AS IT APPEARS THAT ITS INTEGRITY

MIGHT BE BREACHED OR VIOLATED IF LEFT AS IS.

A MEMO FROM DAN DREWERY INDICATES THE STATUS OF WELL ABANDONMENT AND A " QUICK &

DIRTY" FIRST BLUSH ON A LONG TERM SOLUTION - A CONCRETE RETAINING WALL. WE WILL NEED

MORE TIME AND RESEARCH TO COME UP WITH A DEFINITIVE LONG TERM SOLUTION, BUT WILL BE

BACK TO THE VILLAGE BOARD WITH WELL THOUGHT OUT OPTIONS IN SHORT ORDER.

THIS IS A STATUS REPORT ON THIS SITUATION.

lJ

Steven Kubacki

From: Dan DrewerySent: Thursday, April 28, 2016 11:25 AMTo: Steven Kubacki

Cc: Patricia lelen; Kay MagyarSubject: Sunsetset beach park

Steve / Pat / Kay

The process of well abandonment has been initiated, and we will do as much as we can in- house... I have been on the

phone with the DNR and will follow their requirements until complete...

Also looked into a approximate 60 inch concrete retaining wall, on top of a 36 inch abutment, with 10 ft. wide stepentrance in the middle of the wall proceeding to the water, at a cost of 30 to 40 dollars per square ft. Prices for the

concrete retaining wall with center entrance to the water came in at 30k to 50k depending on the height of the wall...

Dan

Vi(fagC,

sS

1 t'Ca e 0U

TO: VILLAGE BOARD

FROM: STAFF

SUBJECT: 2017 BRIDGE FUND CONTRIBUTIONS

DATE: 5/ 2/ 16

BACKGROUND

In the past, the Village of Suamico has made annual contributions to the Brown CountyBridge and Culvert Aid Fund. Under this program, Brown County holds this money until the villageconstructs projects that qualify for reimbursement, at which time the county reimburses for thosecosts with a 50% match of county funds.

OPTIONS AND ANALYSIS

The Village of Suamico currently has a balance of $195, 491. 06 in this fund. We have onestructure that we are replacing, that bridge being P050072, located on St. Pats Road. This structureand the project has been let and scheduled for replacement starting in June of 2016. This project isestimated to cost $509,000 and will be 80% federal participation with 20% of the costs being theresponsibility for the Village of Suamico, or about $102, 000. This will leave us with about a

93,491. 06 balance upon completion.

We have been averaging approximately $25, 000 pet year in culvert replacements which havequalified for bridge fund reimbursement. That trend should stay the same this year with a fewculverts on the radar that need replacing.

Sunset Beach road is under the magnifying glass for work to be done on the culvert neat thepump station this summer so some monies will be used for that project. As you recall, there hasbeen a demand for guardrail installation, which in fact will requite the shoulders to be reconstructed

as they ate quite steep. For this process, the pond on the north side will need to be isolated anddrained in order for the village to replace that culvert.

FISCAL IMPACT

The decision on whether or not to contribute additional monies to this program in 2017 will

directly affect annual budget.

RECOMMENDED ACTION

The Village Board should consider adding some monies into the County Aide Bridge Fund for2017.

E

DATE:

TO:

FROM:

SUBJECT:

May 2, 2016Village Board

Steve Dunks

Gokey conditional use revision

General Information

Location: 500ft south of Brown Rd on the east side of Velp Ave

Requested Action: To modify the conditional use which restricts the size of thecommercial building.

Owner/Applicant: Daniel Gokey412 McAllister Ave

Marinette, WI 54143

Parcel Number: SU -40-4 & SU -40- 5

Size: 4. 3+ acres

Existing Zoning & Land Use: NB; vacant land

Surrounding Zoning & Land Use: North: RR, single family homeSouth: RR & HB, single family, vacant land & agWest: RR, single family home & vacant land

East: HB, Vacant land & commercial

Background

The subject property was rezoned in July of 2014 from RR to NB. A conditional use wasalso approved to allow a single family home to be constructed on the site with thefollowing conditions; 1. Commercial structure is limited to a maximum of 3, 600 sq. ft., with a paintingoperation limited to 400 sq. ft. 2. Residential use is limited to one single family home. 3. A 50 ft. vegetative buffer shall remain on the south and west property lines. 4. Signage along Velp Ave shall be limited to a maximum of a single two sided signnot greater than 10 sq. ft. per side. 5. A maximum of two non-resident employees.

a

6. Parking shall be limited to 4 stalls. 7. Approval of a rezone to Neighborhood Business8. Meet the requirements of all other applicable ordinances, regulations, and

reviewing agencies

As Mr. Gokey was preparing the initial building plans and equipment placement, hediscovered that condition 1 is a bit to limiting in the overall size and efficiency for thebusiness. Mr. Gokey is asking for the total structure size to be increased to 5, 250 sq ft. The air make-up set-ups on the new booths is substantially larger than expected. I believehis original idea was for a 60 x 60 main building with the 400sq ft spray booth as anadditional attachment to that (4,000sq ft total). He is now looking at a 70 x 75 buildingwith the booth internal to that.

Considering the vegetation that is on the site and the distance it will be from the road, thisis a minor adjustment to the overall size of the building. The 7 other conditions remain asapproved.

Planning & Zoning Commission motion

Motion by Zastrow to recommend approval of modifying the conditional use on SU -40- 440- 5 allowing a single family home, increasing the maximum size of the commercial

structure from 3, 600sq ft to 5, 250sq ft total, second by Yaggie, motion carried 7- 0.

Suggested Motion

Motion to approve modifying the conditional use on SU -40-4 & 40- 5 allowing a singlefamily home, increasing the maximum size of the commercial structure from 3, 600sq ftto 5, 250sq ft total

General Information

Location: West side ofPine Ln, south of Lost Creek Ln

Requested Action: Approval of a 4 -lot CSM

Owner /Applicant: Julie Voight, Pamela Bertler, Brenda Bloom, & Nancy McAllister438 Fawnwood Ct

Wrightstown, WI 54180

Surveyor: Dave Chrouser, Mau & Associates

400 Security BlvdGreen Bay, WI 54313

Parcel Number: SU -98- 2

Size: 8. 29 acres

Existing Zoning & Land Use: RR; Single family home, ag & forest

Surrounding Zoning & Land Use: North:

South:

East:

West:

RR & Oconto County; single family homeRR; single family homes & vacant land

RR & PL & I; Single family homes & Reforestation CampRR; Single family homes

Background

A 4 -lot CSM was approved in 2015 for the land adjacent to & under the

same/ similar ownership to this property. Some of the remnant land has beentransferred to this parcel and will now be further divided as part of this parcel.

The remnant and this parcel were part of a preliminary plat approved in Decemberof 2015. Some issues with likely wetlands and a crossing for access to the uplandsof that remnant have further delayed any determinations on the ability to complete

Aaa

the final plat. After completion of this 4- lot,CSM, any furtherlandJivision willrequire the submittal of a plat.

The acreage & frontage both meet or exceed the code requirements.

No additional roads will need to be constructed

The existing structures appear to meet all of our code requirementsThe property is in a location that will remain in a private sewer & water area for

the foreseeable future, 20+ years.

Fiscal Impact

Parkland dedication fees of $300 per each additional lot created ($ 900) will be

required at signing of the CSM by the Village. The 3 un -improved lots should bring an increase of a minimum of $750,000 inassessed value at buildout.

Planning & Zoning Commission motion

Motion by VanRossum to recommend approval/denial of a Certified Survey Map forparcel SU -98- 2 with the following conditions; 1. Payment of Parkland Dedication fees of $900

2. Meets the requirements of all other applicable .ordinances, regulations and

reviewing agencies,

Second by Ward, motion carried 7- 0.

Suggested Motion

Motion to approve a Certified 1ISurvey Map forpareel SU -98- 2 with the followingconditions;

1. Payment of Parkland Dedication fees of $900

2. Meets the requirements of all other applicable:.ordinances, regulations and

reviewing agencies

Z

4

Lsia1;

2499i3l

t3Agr?,

t

I

I

m

1

L

I

MCI ,

ci !

i

E ^

Z->

aI

ole

0

w

o

vlv

N

Z

DO

C\)'

e

fsO

O =

llffl.4$

e•

SIO '-

o-----------

Z

O

4

99'

ZL9Z

3,,

2Z,

20.

0

o,

v9

4

spuoI}

am

4

09'

69£

00 .

JN

Ld

CM 4-

M

O

f>

9h

N

C,

G6o

A>

O

ao

Pa°°

Z

ZI

W

N

O

O

CD

CD

4co

04

t \

q

W

C0

0)

0

Y)

DA

o

D'

r7

v =

Z

O

WO

O

O

N

o

o

N

N

F-

O

4 -->

i

00

O

Z (

10

ON

r

o ->

a

M

0.

4--

01

O

N

N

IOO

m

W

o

U — 0O

N

0

Wo

c

Pa -

Lo-

4.

E

o

c

o

0

E

Lm

o

W

a

coc00

0

rCtU)

p

O

o

r,

x

o

E

o, c

0

CO

a

o

0N

o

rn

n

o

ci

o

Q

Z

uV

3

o

N

Q

n

d

3OL

o

prN

o

m

axi

3

0

0

o

I

1LI

I

I

m

1

L

I

MCI ,

ci !

i

E ^

Z->

aI

ole

0

w

o

vlv

N

Z

DO

of

SIO '-

o-----------

4

99'

ZL9Z3,,

2Z,

20.

0

o,

v9

4 spuoI}am

4

09'

69£

JN

Ld

INNI

f>

9hN

C,

1

A>

O

ao

Pa°°

ZI

W

N

CD

CD

4co

04

DA

U21

O

N=

QD

a

i

N

g6ioA

allnp

S

4 -->

i

00

PUDE

Pa}}

ojdun

OIXH

slnol

dwo0not}o}

sajo}ad

b8—

nS __

I

Md /}

uno0

uMojo

puolpa}}

ojdun _

99—

QS __

c _

N

N

sasodindpoolao}

PuolPa}}

oldungL

uj

o

Z

ollgndaq}

o}

pa}

oolpap -

4-

CD

Y

LL'

9923„

2Z,2O.OS

Nrl

JIIdM,

BZ'9£

6L—

ca

c

L

VA._

w

cn

N

99'99£

3„£

Z,£

0.

OS

Nrl

JNIdM

1_

c•

inz •—.

W'1;

GL— — — — —

t — —

m00U)

tea

von

MCI ,

00

Z->

aI

DO

of

4

ZO'

90ZM„

2Z,£O.

ON

o,

v9

4 spuoI}am

4

JN

Ld

I

f>

9hN

A>

fIC'

8ti"

t6t

ao

Pa°°

4

z

o 4LOa

i

N

g6ioA

allnp

7>

4 -->

i

C3)

86—

ns

r7r

PUDE

Pa}}

ojdun

Z (

10

ON

r

o ->

a

tea

von

MCI ,

00

Z->

aIof

4

4

Q

JNI

f>

4

A>

4

4

OLOIa; U0LO

O

00

D00Lo

Imo->

J

4-

O

o

o

Z

O

Z

N

0

a '

0c

U)

LL

0Z_

NU' WN

IvZZrnZzAvgWo

O("

WrnD C6Z

or - U)

oh

p}

U)

rnr

U-

woZ!

0

C6

C)

JU

OOC

3

O

Cl)

N

O

CD

co

N

L (

1)

C

2ico

DUoco

Lm(.0

x

as

a)

UF

o

ii

0

1

CD

00

T

0

W

E

OC

OOL()

0675

mN

mac

Q

w

I

0 _

Oo

O

a)

CO

L0-

O

EoEN

o

4—

o

O

Q. II

o

o

o

oa

a) '

0

QQ

O

O

z

Lr)

o

o

Z

i,

N

C:

m

a)

0

va

V)

Q

t

UN

c

Qm

0

W

o

o'>

II

o

0

3

orII

o

z

nt

aEi

U)

O

c

o

c

Q

O•>

L

a)

II

Q

0

O

c

C7

Q

Z

o

a-'

to

C

I

a)

01pcn ..

ca

k-- •-

m

C)

m -

II

cN

o

c

o

Q .

c

II

E

o

C.

F

oID

mM3o

c

o

w

c

or

c

o

cn

c

Z

L

a)

6 -

Q

N

Q.

c -

o

E

3

7

mCDso

mo

oLIIO

rn

a)

d

o

a

I -

II

rn

mU

4_'

o

00 .oEO

QiCo

Q

N

p

E

N

N

II

K) .

V)

O)

OCC) >>

O_

C

oU

O

O

W

Or-

C

O

O

O

O

a)

0

s2

o

N

Q

a)

W

0

CD

o

o

Q

II

U3

Mi

4-

n $

Eo

0

U3

0-

0

E

o

Lc

a)

o

aci

NNc

a) "' '

o

IIQoc0 =

i

O

E`

rno

pzOoo

i

a)

cMnN'

O

EQ

e001111!lrlirF!/f`

lJ

v

o

CD

LON

O

Lov

p

o

cn

L=

f

0

a)

C

a)

o

0

I-

3)

o

o-

Q

a)

FrnQ

jJ

Z •

cNp

CD

E

0

N

Cj

6

ivcQIIo>c'')

p

0

r-

Do}

c

o-

Z6

o- E

0O-

7 >

O

oO

IC-

vn-

O

C

pQE

OOC

L

Q

U)

MO

n

Z)

i

d'

0QE0ija)

cOa) 0

a)

v

IIO-CO

II

c

T

2

WL

0,

Qoo

Q

N

a

C--

o

0)

0

0,"

N

M

CO

N

0

0

c0a)m

0

EQCDLn

p

nI,

O.(c

Q- C,

4

c

O4+

O

d)

O -

E

a)

J

C)

J_ -

O—

C)

O

K'

c

n

Qai

0—

O

W

U

LO

Q

v)

ooci

iL

a)

o

B4414ro6300

O

Q

U

L

0

cn

0

4-

o)

U

TaicQ

00

vNa'

rca7a

Q

3

a)

0

0

c

Z

o

v

W

c .

y., ..

m C

Q

0...

0N

a)

C

T

co

3 -

c

o

Q !''

Q

L

OU

T, c

OU

m

T

p

cn

c

m0

OII

L

L

Q

I-

m

N

c

Oj

O

Z

a) oV

ui

O

U)

N

a

J

c

O

N

d

J

O

61

Z

Q

Q

D -;

s -ice

vo

r7

L)

ac

aTi

sw

o-

c

o

EW

O

O

U

a)

0 .

t.,

O

p

pOp

p

C

O

Z

U

C

C

LO

O—

7

m

cO

m

c

C)

O

Q..

T

Z •

a

3

Z

a

0

o

II

o

Q

L

W

W

o

a

o

U

L: \

N

a)

In

N

II

O

c

Q

O

0

d-

L

Z

W

II

m

mL

m

Q

0

o ,-

3

o

ccj

o

r-

o

µ

Lei

o

c

co

0

r7

0

0

0 •

v)

cs

0.- L

a)

II

o

c

a)

W

v

ai

c

Q

o

z

F- a)

L

F-

LLIIL

0

W

s

Lo .+..

In

v0-

O

o

a

o

c

G) -+

o .

N

Ern

c

o

Qc

Q, O

U

a

c

s

II "'

OLL

O

L

L

c

a)

O

a)

L

T

C)

U

os

0

E

Q)

0

o

Q

o

N

W

W

r

c -+

W

v0-

a)

c

W

o

ao)

X

a)

W

v0

II

c

L

c

c

3

Da

U

U

N ,

3

v

v

v

a,

a)

N

U

U

v

to

U

Z

C (

n ''

4-

OU

4-

U)

II

0

Ol

a—

O

UIn

a)

U ,

E

Lam.

V)

L

LL

Q

O

L

O

a)

I

a) moin

o

0

E

0

c

W

n.

ff

c

o

F-

F-

v

II0

O

CL

O_ Dc

c

Qs

OL

d' (

n

O

E '-

C

U .+

U

a)

C

i

F--)

OL

0n

W

UII.

O

WO_

O_

r+

C

I

N

NQ.'

W

Q,

m

C

N

Q

p

O

L

W

O_

O .-

N

O

0

0

0

L

L

6>

II

z

p

JU

O

a)

J

LCA

UImcn

U

c Imm

U

m> o

Q

z

co

r

m

m

r

p

0- 00

4=

b

v

Z

L

Q

sV)

a

a

o

0

C.

2

0.— Q) O

U

LU

S

c

G7 N

U

J

II 0

C

N

U

a

4>

O

NO

O

j

U

N

O0

0 —

ONjZO

O_

VU

m

a)

IW

o

I

3 °)

O

U)

Z

C

a)

o

C

Q

SO-

0

m

m

CD

E

U

0

10

II

c

0

to

m

m

la

710O

a) Ec3La) O0E0Oa)

a; 0fnNoi Q) 00OC

UO

I

C0JC

O •- T a

c

0

OvO- a)

m .

sL0

0EUm

0

O

o E

c

0

0

U TNO_

0c

o

o -

c

ia)

o

Z -

o

T

a)

En

U

40-

0

0

UL -:

i

U

L

Qa)

U •

L

O)

aa?

0

a)

T

L

C

C

E

0 -

o"'

L

a)

o-• "

0

Oa--+

L .

a) -

N

p

L

eO+

00

0

a) >

O

L

U

EcOL[oL0p

mo0mCa) —

COC?

E

L

0N

01

L]

o

C

O

U

U-

0

aa)i

tZ3 -

0E

p

o

c

E+

C

0

OLO

Q

N

a)

O

L

TO

s

N

O •

U

L

W

O '

C - =

N

fl

0

U '

5

t -

tO

0

O

4-

O

U

0=

OL -

tom

U

a) -

p

O

L

µ-

U

L - -

i- '

i' (

n

01 -

1--

c

Q

p

o

c

D

0

a)

NU

N

rs0 +'

6

m

E

O

Eve

o

h

o -

0 -

n

aciL

a%

c

C31i

L

CL

O

a)

N

a)

0.

2

Lp

0 '

DE-

0.

0-

0

NOID

L

o

c —

o

rn+/

L

p

o

O"

E

s

c

L

v7

3 '

rn

a)

o

M

CD "

6c-

00

E0

c -+-'

CD

ir,

a

n

U

L

E'

0

L

o

v7

o

c

o0

3_

0

v

a)

o

n

0

0

0

Z

L •

cc

0

n.

L

O

C

E

O

O '

a)

U)

m

p .

O

p

Q

O

O

a ,

Oc ~

y=

r -

ip+

0

o

Q)

aJ

C

fn -,

0-

to

W

O

E .

0

O

d_

O

0

a)

p

U

c ++"

0

0

N

L

L

O

U

0

C

cn •

U

L "

SIIU7

D

00

a

C '

p

47

0

cc

m =

o

o

o

Qo

a)

4

m

E

E _

3

U

U

O

O

d

U

O

E

0

0 ,

U

O

L

O

O

0

O

N

D

O

O.

2 - LI).

II -+

Q

C

m -

tom

C -

Cc: -

6

u)-

6

Q

T

U

N -

N

OL

a)

O

Z

V)

0 =

5 -

0

O

d

C

O --

ate

m _

O

C -

O

0

3 '

O

w

0

0

0-

O_(

13 "

0

O

C

O

c ¢

O)

c

L

d

a)

L

T

0

0

tea)

N

p)

m

0

p

vO-

3

U ', -

T -

n

O

O

C

D

o

a

v)

s

C)

0

a)

0

c

o

a

W

a

o

Z

C

N

U

O

O •

U

T

a) ++

O

y

Cf)

O6;

3

Q

U

E

p

0

a) -

0 -

0 -

p °

j

C

fines>> >

Los

v

o

o

Z

0

T

w

0 • ~

a

o

p

0

3

s

o

Q

L _

U

4)

N

a7

p

c

ca

E

U

T

O

m

4- -+

w >

U '

o

a

0

O

0

LL

fn

a) •

a)

O

0

O

z3

C

O

O

O—

S

0

CD

cr

0

a

o

o

p

o

U

U,

o ¢

Z

0

0L

m'

o

E°%

cLu2

L

c

s

Z

m (

n

U

C

0

d)

O

a)

Ei

O_•

L

C

L

s

0

0 ='

U

U

0

M

0

o0

00NLoJ

O

o

ZZU . d)

O

cab

L

Q

a

a

a

o

U

c

N

O

U

J

U

Cc,

N

U

a

O

j

U

O •

U

L

W

O '

C - =

N

fl

0

U '

5

t -

tO

0

O

4-

O

U

0=

OL -

tom

U

a) -

p

O

L

µ-

U

L - -

i- '

i' (

n

01 -

1--

c

Q

p

o

c

D

0

a)

NU

N

rs0 +'

6

m

E

O

Eve

o

h

o -

0 -

n

aciL

a%

c

C31i

L

CL

O

a)

N

a)

0.

2

Lp0 '

DE-

0.

0-

0

N

OID

L

o

c —

o

rn+/

L

p

o

O"

E

s

c

L

v7

3 '

rn

a)

o

M

CD "

6c-

00

E0

c -+-'

CD

ir,

a

n

U

L

E'

0

L

o

v7

o

c

o0

3_

0

v

a)

o

n

0

0

0

Z

L •

cc

0

n.

L

O

C

E

O

O '

a)

U)

m

p .

O

p

Q

O

O

a ,

Oc ~

y=

r -

ip+

0

o

Q)

aJ

C

fn -,

0-

to

W

O

E .

0

O

d_

O

0

a)

p

U

c ++"

0

0

N

L

L

O

U

0

C

cn •

U

L "

SII

U7

D

00

a

C '

p

47

0

cc

m =

o

oo

Qo

a)

4

m

E

E _

3

U

U

O

O

d

U

O

E

0

0 ,

U

O

L

O

O

0

O

N

D

O

O.2 -

LI).

II -+

Q

C

m -

tom

C -

Cc: -

6

u)-

6

Q

T

U

N -

N

OL

a)

O

Z

V)

0 =

5 -

0

O

d

C

O --

ate

m _

O

C -

O

0

3 '

O

w

0

0

0-

O_(

13 "

0

O

C

O

c ¢

O)

c

L

d

a)

L

T

0

0

tea)

N

p)

m

0

p

vO-

3

U ', -

T -

n

O

O

C

D

o

a

v)

s

C)

0

a)

0

c

o

a

W

a

o

Z

C

N

U

O

O •

U

T

a) ++

O

y

Cf)

O6;

3

Q

U

E

p

0

a) -

0 -

0 -

p °

j

C

fines>> >

Los

v

o

o

Z

0

T

w

0 • ~

a

o

p

0

3

s

o

Q

L _

U

4)

N

a7

p

c

ca

E

U

T

O

m

4- -+

w >

U '

o

a

0

O

0

LL

fn

a) •

a)

O

0

O

z3

C

O

O

O—

S0CD

cr

0

a

o

o

p

o

U

U,

o ¢

Z0

0L

m'

o

E°%

cLu2

L

c

s

Z

m (

n

U

C

0

d)

O

a)

Ei

O_•

L

C

L

s

0

0 ='

U

U

0

M

0

o000N

LoJ

O

oZZ

U .

d)

Vdage oft

DATE: May 2, 2016TO: Village Board

FROM: Steve Dunks

SUBJECT: North Shore PDD amendment

General Information

Location: 1838 Cardinal Ln, on the northeast corner of Linville Rd & Cardinal Ln.

Requested Action: To modify the PDD allowing a retaining wall and bump -out to thedrive-thru egress lane

Owner/Applicant: North Shore Bank

1838 Cardinal Ln

Suamico, WI 54313

Surveyor: Joel Ehrfurth

Mach IV Engineering211 N. BroadwayGreen Bay, WI 54303

Parcel Number: SU -758- 1

Size: . 353 acres

Existing Zoning & Land Use: RS; single family home

Surrounding Zoning & Land Use: North: B w/PDD; Auto sales

South: Village of Howard; all commercial

East: B w/PDD; Auto sales

West: Village of Howard; School property

Background

A PDD overlay to allow the construction of the North Shore Bank was approvedby the Village Board in 2015. The Bank opened at the end of February, 2016.

After a little over a month of operations it has become apparent that there is not

enough room on the northern side of the drive-thru to comfortably exit the drive- hh • V'

thru. Vehicles have been repeatedly driving into and over the curb when exitingthe drive-thru lanes. North Shore would like to bump out the northern pavementwith a retaining wall and new curb to alleviate this issue.

Planning & Zoning Commision motion

Motion by Ward to recommend to the Village Board approval of a PDD alterationallowing for expansion of the egress lane on the northern side of the bank, second byYaggie, motion carried 7- 0.

Suggested Motion

Motion to approve a PDD alteration allowing for expansion of the egress lane on thenorthern side of the bank.

3

Documents

7 P.M. - Suamico Village Board Packet.pdf2016/05/02 · Request by Daniel Gokey to modify the conditional use permit on parcels SU -40-4 & 40-5 to increase the allowable size ofthe