802.3ab

802.3ab

A TutorialPresentation

802.3ab

1000BASE-T Tutorial Structure

Introduction, Market & History Colin Mick, The Mick Group

Cabling Chris DiMinico, Cabletron

Channel and Overall Architecture Sreen Raghavan, ComCore Semiconductor

Technical Details Sailesh Rao, Level One Communications

Detailed VLSI Implementation Mehdi Hatamian, Broadcom Corporation

802.3ab

One New Design Task for 1000BASE-T

5 Level Signaling costs 6dB in SNR Get back with Forward Error Correction (FEC)

Everything else has been done in: 100Base-TX

125Msps DSP works

100Base-T4 Transmit/Receive on 4 channels

100Base-T2 ECHO and NEXT canceling

802.3ab

Where Does 802.3ab Fit?

Media Access Control (MAC)Full Duplex / Half Duplex

1000BASE-TEncoder / Decoder

1000BASE-X 8b/10bEncoder / Decoder

1000BASE-SXTransceiver

1000BASE-CXTransceiver

1000BASE-TTransceiver

Gigabit Media Independent Interface (GMII)

MAC

PHY

Fiber Channel Based Technology

1000BASE-LXTransceiver

|802.3z| |802.3ab|

802.3ab

Target Market

70% of installed UTP is CAT 5

CAT 5 installed footage is growing 30% annually

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997

VoiceFiber OpticCoaxialSTPUTP

802.3ab

Market Applications

Server Farms

High performance work groups

Graphic-based applications

Network computers

Shared gigabit networks

802.3ab

Objectives

Comply with specifications for GMII of 802.3z. Provide line transmission which supports full and half duplex

operation. Provide FCC Class A/CISPR or better operation Support operation over 100 meters of Category 5 balanced

cabling Achieve bit Error Rate better than to 10-10

Support Auto-Negotiation (Clause 28) Meet susceptibility requirements Support the objectives of 802.3z of Nov. 13, 1996

802.3ab

Foundations

100BASE-TX demonstrates sending a 3-level symbol streamover Category 5 cable at 125 Mbaud is possible and practical.

- 100BASE-TX DSP Based Phys now available 100BASE-T4 demonstrates techniques for sending multi-level

coded symbols over four pairs. 100BASE-T2 demonstrates the use of digital signal processing

(DSP), five-level coding, and simultaneous two-way datastreams while dealing with alien signals in adjacent pairs

802.3ab

Timeline

Milestone 802.3z 802.3abWork starts November 95 November 95

PAR received March 96 March 97

1st draft January 97 November 97

WG ballot July 97 March 98*

LMSC ballot November 97 July 98*

Ready for std June 98* December 98*

802.3ab

Status

Now reviewing D2-0

Task force doing final tuning on D2-0 during this Plenary.

On-track to request permission to go to working groupballot at this Plenary

802.3ab

Cabling

Topology

Cabling Specifications

Cabling standards

802.3ab

Channel Cabling Topology

building Cablecross-connectionequipmentcable

work areacable

connecting hardware

transition point

telecommunicationsoutlet/connectorequipment

TIA/EIA - 568-A Channel (w/o transition Point) = ISO 11801 Channel

Cross-Connect Topology

802.3ab

Installed Cabling

Minimizes connections Minimizes crosstalk, both near-end and far-end Minimizes return loss and insertion loss

building Cable

interconnection

equipmentcable work area

cable

connecting hardwaretelecommunicationsoutlet/connector

equipment

Recommended Interconnect Topology

802.3ab

Cabling Performance Specifications

Based on Category 5 Installed Cabling

Project Authorization Request (PAR) for the 1000BASE-T project specificallyrequires operation on four pair 100 ohm Category 5 balanced copper cabling asdefined by TIA/EIA-568-A, or its equivalent as built from material specified byISO/IEC 11801: 1995 that meets the channel performance parameters specifiedin TIA/EIA-568-A ANNEX E.

Additional cabling specifications: Draft Addendum to ANSI/TIA/EIA-568-A:

Additional specifications for FEXT (ELFEXT) and return loss, not currentlyspecified by TIA/EIA-568-A, are being developed developed to characterizethe vast majority of the installed base of Category 5 cabling built to TIA/EIA-568-A and/or ISO/IEC 11801clauses 6, 8 & 9.

An addendum to ANSI/TIA/EIA-568-A will include the additional transmissionperformance specifications and field test parameters for FEXT (ELFEXT) andreturn loss.

802.3ab

Field Testing

A verification of the installed cabling performance perthe field test specification of ANSI/TIA/EIA-TSB-67-"Transmission Performance Specifications for FieldTesting of Twisted Pair Cabling System" with theadditional test parameters for FEXT (ELFEXT) andreturn loss (to be released as an addendum to TIA/EIA-568-A) will be recommended.

802.3ab

Cabling Specifications

Frequency(MHz) Return Loss(dB) 1

802.3ab

Channel Return Loss

C h a n n e l C o n fig u r a t io n R e tu r n L o ss

- 7 0

- 6 0

- 5 0

- 4 0

- 3 0

- 2 0

- 1 0

0

0 2 0 4 0 6 0 8 0 1 0 0

M H z

dB

m a n u f 1 - O r a n g e p a ir 2 0 m

m a n u f 1 - B r o w n p a ir 2 0 m



1 5 - 1 0 *L O G ( f / 2 0 )

1 7 - 1 0 *L O G ( f / 2 0 )

m a n u f 2 - 2 0 m

802.3ab

Channel Insertion Loss

Insertion Loss Model - Category 5 100 Meter Measured Link, Measured Link Scaled & EIA-568-A Annex E Insertion Loss Limit

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

22

24

26

1 4 7 10

13

16

19

22

25

28

31

34

37

40

43

46

49

52

55

58

61

64

67

70

73

76

79

82

85

88

91

94

97

10 0

Frequency (MHz)

Inse

rtio

n L

oss

(dB

)

Measured Link

Measured Link Scaled

EIA-568-A Annex E Limit

802.3ab

Coupling Parameters (Crosstalk)

40.8.3.1 Differential Near-End Crosstalk (NEXT) LossThe NEXT loss between all duplex channels of a link segment shall begreater than 27.1 - 16.8Log10 (f/100).

40.8.3.2 Equal Level Far-End Crosstalk (ELFEXT) Loss The worst pair ELFEXT loss between a duplex channel shall be greater than 17 - 20Log 10 (f/100) dB

40.8.3.2.1 Multiple Disturber Far-end Crosstalk (ELFEXT) Loss1. 17.0 - 20Log 10 (f/100) dB.2. 19.5 - 20Log 10 (f/100) dB.3. 23.0 - 20Log 10 (f/100) dB.

PSELFEXT loss is 14.4-20*log(f/100)

802.3ab

Channel Next

Channel NEXT

-140

-120

-100

-80

-60

-40

-20

0

0 20 40 60 80 100

MHz

dB

NEXT Model 2 (Lucent)



TIA/EIA-Channel Limit

802.3ab

Channel and Overall Architecture

Design Tasks

Design Approach

Receiver Startup

802.3ab

Gigabit Over CAT-5 Copper Cable

Topology -- Link segment of a 4-Pair Cat-5 Cable. Each pair a fullduplex channel supporting effective data rate of 250Mbp/s in bothdirections simultaneously ECHO, SELF NEXT and FEXT

Hybrid to cancel most of the NEAR END ECHO Adaptive cancellers to reduce remaining ECHO and SELF NEXT

Signal to Noise Ratio (SNR) 6dB Less Than 100Base-TX due to5-level signaling Provide 6dB coding gain in the form of a 4-D Trellis code

Channel Impairments 20dB signal attenuation at 62MHz at 100 meters

Incorporate decision feedback channel equalization External Noise

FCC imposed limits on transmit levels Limit transmit spectrum above 30MHz

Partial Response spectral shaping at the transmitter (3/4 + 1/4Z-1)

802.3ab

Major Receiver Design Tasks

A/D conversion 125 Mega samples per second Conversion

Frequency Locking and Timing Recovery Low Jitter Phase Locked Loop for clock recovery

FEC 4D-8 State Trellis Code Design of critical timing path involving Trellis

decoder and decision feeback equalizer

802.3ab

802.3ab

MLT-3 and PAM-5 Signal Levels

Recover the 6dB of SNR -- Add Forward Error Correction (FEC)

Time (in ns)

Eye pattern of PAM-5 signaling

Time (in ns)

Eye pattern of MLT-3 signaling

1 volt

.5 volt

802.3ab

Transmitter

GMII PCS

DAC

DAC

DAC

DAC

Tx1

Tx2

Tx3

Tx4

125 MBaud5-PAM

14/14/3 -+ z

14/14/3 -+ z

14/14/3 -+ z

14/14/3 -+ z

Similar to 100Base-TX New DSP forGigabit

New Analogfor Gigabit

802.3ab

DSP Based Receiver Block Diagram

Hybrid

AnalogFront Endincl. A/D

Converter

DSP Based Receiver FECCAT-5Cable

Transmitted Data This Channel

To EchoCanceller

ClockRecovery

Recoveredand

CorrectedData

Transmitted Data --Other Channels

To NEXTCancellers

Added FECfor

Gigabit

802.3ab

Typical 100TX DSP Based Receiver

Feed ForwardEqualization

Slicer(comparators)

OutputData

RemovePrecursor

ISI

Reconstruction ofTransmitted Data

+

DFE

A/DAnalog

Input

Recovered

Clock

Ideal sliceddataError

AdjustsCoefficients

ErrorAdjusts

CoefficientsError is the differencebetween Ideal Sliced Data andReconstruction ofTransmitted Data Remove Post-

Cursor ISI

AnalogFrontEnd

(AFE)

802.3ab

Detail of DFE Based Equalizer{ Xk } T T T

X

+

mk

T T T

{Zk} +

X X X

+

c0ff c1ffcnff

-

b0fbb1fbbnfb

{ Dk }

X X

+

Feed Forward Equalizer

Feedback EqualizerFBE

Slicer

The error signal used to setthe coefficients (c0ff - cnff andb0fb - bnfb) is the differencebetween mk (the actual inputto the slicer) and xk (theoutput of the slicer -- theideal signal level)

++-

802.3ab

Gigabit Receiver With FEC

NEXTCanceller

Feed ForwardEqualization

ViterbiDecoder

DFE #1

DFE #N

ECHOCanceller

NEXTCanceller

NEXTCanceller

+ ReceiveData

TX output channel 1

TX output channel 2

TX output channel 3

TX output channel 4

Removes PostCursor ISI(both from

channel andPR shaping)

RemovePrecursor

ISI

Provides 6dBcoding gain

Decision FeedbackEqualizers.

.

Input Samples to Viterbi

+

-

8

From Other Channels

A/Dconv

AFE

Recovered Clock

ReceiveSignal

802.3ab

PHY Start-up

1000BASE-T Start-up protocol provides for two differentstart-up procedures for maximum robustness while

preserving complete interoperability:

- Blind Start-up: where all adaptive filter blocks converge without sequencing. If the PHYs at the two ends of the link bothimplement this procedure (which is determined during the autonegotiation), the sequenced start-up is bypassed.

- Sequenced Start-up: where the convergence of various adaptive blocks are separated in a 3 step sequence.

802.3ab

Eye Diagrams (master sequenced start-up)

802.3ab

100BASE-TX Receiver 1000BASE-T Receiver

A/D Conversion 5.5 bit ideal at 125MSamples/sec 7 bit ideal at 125MSamples/sec

DFE 10 Taps 14 Taps/Channel

FFE 8 Taps 12 Taps/Channel

NEXT Cancellers 0 75 Taps/Channel

ECHO Canceller 0 60 Taps

Critical Path 3 Input Add

+ 3 Input Select

+ 1 Slicer

4 Input Add-Compare Select

+ 3 Input Add

+ 5 Input Select

+ Branch Metric Compute

Normalized Gate Complexity 1 8

Receiver Design Parameter Comparison

802.3ab

Technical Details of 1000BASE-T

1000BASE-T Topology

Operation of 1000BASE-T

Signaling

Trellis Coded Modulation Performance Evaluations

802.3ab

1000BASE-T Topology

Link Segments

1000BASE-TMaster PHY

1000BASE-TSlave PHY

Externaltiming

Tx

Rx

Tx

Rx

Tx

Rx

Tx

Rx Recoveredtiming

Tx

Rx

Tx

Rx

Tx

Rx

Tx

Rx

802.3ab

Block Diagram of Transceiver

HybridRECEIVER_B

Analog

HybridNEXT

Canceller

ECHO

Canceller

VGA

Cable

TRANSMITTER_A

RECEIVER_A

Gain, Timing

TRANSMITTER_B

+

1000 Mb/s

D ig ital Transmit

AnalogReceiveFilter

D igital LinearFeedForwardEqualizer

TransmitFilterFilter

Pair A

Pair B

G

I

I

Control

Side-StreamScrambler

SymbolEncoder

Side-StreamDescrambler

ViterbiDecoder

Escape + Controls

&

&

Escape + Controls

A/D

D/A

M

NEXT

Canceller

NEXT

Canceller

HybridRECEIVER_C

TRANSMITTER_C

HybridRECEIVER_D

TRANSMITTER_D

Pair C

Pair D

DFE +

802.3ab

Transmitter

Transmit Spectrum of 1000BASE-T

Pulse TemplateExample Implementation of Transmitter

D

0.250.75

SLOPE

DAC

Digital Transmit Filter

An

BI_DA

CONTROLLED

802.3ab

Signaling Features

Forward Error Correction (FEC) coded symbol mapping fordata

Algorithmic mapping and inverse mapping from octet data to aquartet of quinary symbols and back

Uncorrelated symbols in the transmitted symbol stream No correlation between symbol streams traveling both directions

on any pair combination No correlation between symbol streams on pairs A, B, C and D Ternary symbol mapping in idle and training modes to ease

blind startup and retraining

802.3ab

Signaling Features (cont.)

Ability to rapidly or immediately determine if a symbolstream represents data, idle or carrier extension

Robust delimiters for SSD, ESD, and other control signals

Ability to signal the status of the local receiver to the remote PHY to indicate that the local receiver is not operating reliably and requires retraining

Ability to automatically detect and correct for pair swapping and unexpected cross-over connections

Ability to automatically detect and correct for incorrectpolarity in the connections

Ability to automatically correct for differential delay variations across the wire-pairs

802.3ab

Side Stream Scrambler

Side Stream Scrambler employed by Master PHY

Side Stream Scrambler employed by Slave PHY

802.3ab

Random Bits for Octet Scrambling

Scrn-1

[0]

T

Scrn-1[12] Scrn-1[13] Scrn-1[32]

T T T TT T T T T T

Scr_Bn-1[0]

T T T T T T T T

Scr_Cn-1[0]

T T T T T T T T

Scr_Dn-1

[0]

T T T T T T T T

Syn[2]

Sxn[2]

Sgn[2]

Syn[1]

Sxn[1]

Sgn[1]

Syn[0]

Sxn[0]

Sgn[0]

Syn[3]

Sxn[3]

Sgn[3]

802.3ab

Symbol Mapping Reference Diagram

Odd/EvenCoding

Scrambling &

EncodingConvolutional

SymbolMapping

SignEncoding

SnAn

SnBn

SnCn

SnDn

tx_enablen

tx_enablen tx_errorn

Tx_Dn[0:7]

Sxn[0:3]

Syn[0:3]

Sgn[0:3]

Scn[0:7] Sdn[0:8]

TAn

TBn

TCn

TDn

An

Bn

Cn

Dn

tx_enablen

802.3ab

Trellis Coded Modulation

Purpose: To match the robustness of 3-level 100BASE-TX signaling with 5-level 1000BASE-T signaling

Implemented as a two-step approach:- Convolutional Encoding to convert scrambled octet data to 9-bit word.- Mapping by Set Partitioning to get 6dB noise immunity gain.

Scrambler

Tx_Dn[0:7]

Scn[0:7]

(Bitwise XOR)

T T T

Sdn[0]Sd

n[1]

Sdn[2]

Sdn[3]Sdn[4]Sdn[5]Sd

n[6]

Sdn[7]

Sdn[8]

Subset

PointsinSubset

Index

coding_enable

802.3ab

Subset Mapping

Partition 5-levels into 2 1-D subsets:X={-1,+1}, Y={-2,0,+2}.

Squared distance between elements in 1D subset is 4.

802.3ab

Trellis Diagram

Convolutional Encoder Bits at time n

Convolutional Encoder Bits at time n+1

D0 D2 D4 D6

D1 D3 D5 D7

000

001

010

011

100

101

110

111

000

001

010

011

100

101

110

111

D2 D0 D6 D4

D3 D1 D7 D5

D4 D6 D0 D2

D5 D7 D1 D3

D6 D4 D2 D0

D7 D5 D3 D1

D0 D2 D4 D6

D2 D0 D6 D4

D4 D6 D0 D2

D6 D4 D2 D0

D1 D3 D5 D7

D3 D1 D7 D5

D5 D7 D1 D3

D7 D5 D3 D1

802.3ab

Sequential Decoding

Squared distance between valid paths is also 4.D2

D1

D6

D3

802.3ab

Packetizing the Trellis Code

Idle/Carrier Extension use 3-level signaling i.e. D0 subset

Data uses Trellis Coding Reset convolutional encoder states to zero using two

symbol periods at End of Packet

Data Packet => Any State

Idle => State 000 Idle => State 000

CsresetSSD

ESD

802.3ab

1000BASE-T Frame Structure

tx_enablen

SSDn

ESDn

TXD[7:0]

Data stream

An

IDLE IDLEESDDATASSDBn

csresetn

csreset

IDLE IDLEESDDATASSD csreset



Cn

Dn

802.3ab

Performance Evaluations

Worst Case 100m UTP-5 Channel characteristics.

Design Point - 10dB Design Point Simulations Matlab Code Published

802.3ab

Worst Case 100m UTP-5 Channel

802.3ab

Design Point - 10dB

D/A: 17 levels at 125MHZ Launch Level: 2V P-P Analog Transmit Filter: Single pole RC Analog Receive Filter: BW2@100MHz A/D: 6.5bits ideal at 125MHz

2.2 Volts p-p (prob. of clipping 1E-25) Baseline Wander Correction: Digital FFE - #taps: 16 taps at 125MHz DFE - #taps: 12 taps at 125MHz NEXT Cancellers - #taps: 72 taps at 125MHz Echo Canceller - #taps: 120 taps at 125MHz Viterbi Decoder: 12-stage Total worst-case latency: 31BT < 40BT Uniform Jitter Tolerance for 0dB margin: 1.5ns P-P [>10ns P-P Gaussian] Worst-Case noise immunity: Crane Test: 140mV P-P Est. Gate Count/Power Consumption: 330K/4W Margin without FEXT: 10.5dB Margin with Worst-Case FEXT: 5.7dB

802.3ab

Design Results - 10dB

802.3ab

Detailed VLSI Implementation

DSP Requirements

Technology Background

Power requirements

Size and Layout

802.3ab

Transceiver Block Diagram

Blocks common between a Quad 100Base- TX and a 1000BASE-Ttransceiver. NEXT and Echo cancellers are the major blockscontributing to the added complexity over a Fully digital Quad-TX.

802.3ab

DSP Requirements

4 Equalizers (FFE/ FBE), 4 echo cancellers, 12 NEXT cancellers running at 125 MHz clock rate which is also theBaud rate

The bulk of the computation is in the adaptive Finite ImpulseResponse (FIR) filters

The regularity of the filter structures makes the design taskquite manageable

802.3ab

Direct Form FIR Filter

802.3ab

Adaptive FIR

In an adaptive filter, in general, the output of the filter, y(n), is comparedagainst a desired reference r(n) which produces a measure to be used in analgorithm for modifying the filter coefficients (a time varying system). Thefilter coefficients are modified in a way to minimize the measure and bringthe filter output close to the desired output. In an important class of adaptivefilters, adaptation of the coefficients take place without any reference input.This is called blind adaptation.

The most widely used adaptation algorithm is the Least Mean Square(LMS) method where e (n) = r (n) - y (n) and the update is chosen tominimize e2.

802.3ab

Linear Equalizer with LMS Update

The equalizers, NEXT cancellers and echo cancellers in a 1000Base- Ttransceiver are all variations of this filter structure.

802.3ab

Echo Canceller Tap

802.3ab

Power Consumption

Corresponds to about 400,000 gates

Comparing to Quad-TX: Fully digital Quad-TX, 3.3V, 0.50 m CMOS 2.2W 1000BASE-T, 2.5V, 0.25 m CMOS 3.1W

A worst case DSP complexity providing a very high margin ofoperation:

802.3ab

1000BASE-T Copper Transceiver Layout

0.25mm CMOS, 5 layer metal Based on actual layout from a

0.25mm CMOS library

4mm X 4mm active area (65% - 75% of the area of most existing 10/100 PHYs)

160 pins

802.3ab

3 Steps From 100Base-TX to 1000BASE-T

Start with a 100Base-TX DSP Based PHY Use all four channels full duplex

400 MBps in both directions Requires ECHO and NEXT canceling Requires Master/Slave Clocking

Remove 4B/5B Encoding 500 MBps in both directions

5 Level Signaling - 2 Bits/Symbol 1000 MBps in both directions Requires FEC to get back the 6dB SNR

The major task was adding FEC

Documents

802.3ab