Upload
dinhduong
View
224
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
MOORESTOWN TOWNSHIP PUBLIC SCHOOLS
ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING
803 NORTH STANWICK ROAD
MOORESTOWN, NJ 08057
FACILITY ENERGY REPORT
Moorestown Township Public Schools – Administrative Building Energy Audit
Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C12019 October 31, 2012– FINAL Page 1 of 18
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST ................................................................. 2
II. FACILITY DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................ 7
III. MAJOR EQUIPMENT LIST .............................................................................................. 9
IV. ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES ..................................................................... 10
V. ADDITIONAL RECOMMENDATIONS ......................................................................... 18
Appendix A – ECM Cost & Savings Breakdown
Appendix B – New Jersey Smart Start® Program Incentives
Appendix C – Portfolio Manager “Statement of Energy Performance”
Appendix D – Major Equipment List
Appendix E – Investment Grade Lighting Audit
Appendix F – Renewable / Distributed Energy Measures Calculations
Moorestown Township Public Schools – Administrative Building Energy Audit
Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C12019 October 31, 2012– FINAL Page 2 of 18
I. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST The energy usage for the facility has been tabulated and plotted in graph form as depicted within this section. Each energy source has been identified and monthly consumption and cost noted per the information provided by the Owner. Electric Utility Provider: Public Service Electric & Gas Electric Utility Rate Structure: General Lighting & Power (GLP) Third Party Supplier: South Jersey Energy Company Natural Gas Utility Provider: Public Service Electric & Gas Utility Rate Structure: Large Volume Gas (LVG) Third Party Supplier: Hess The electric usage profile represents the actual electrical usage for the facility. The electric utility measures consumption in kilowatt-hours (KWH) and maximum demand in kilowatts (KW). One KWH usage is equivalent to 1000 watts running for one hour. One KW of electric demand is equivalent to 1000 watts running at any given time. The basic usage charges are shown as generation service and delivery charges along with several non-utility generation charges. Rates used in this report reflect the historical data received for the facility. The gas usage profile within each facility report shows the actual natural gas energy usage for the facility. The gas utility measures consumption in cubic feet x 100 (CCF), and converts the quantity into Therms of energy. One Therm is equivalent to 100,000 BTUs of energy.
Moorestown Township Public Schools – Administrative Building Energy Audit
Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C12019 October 31, 2012– FINAL Page 3 of 18
Table 1 Electricity Billing Data
Utility Provider: PSE&GRate: BPL / GLP
Meter No: Unmetered / 278007147Account # 66 030 573 01 / 66 667 825 18
Third Party Utility Provider: South Jersey Energy CompanyTPS Meter / Acct No: -
MONTH OF USE CONSUMPTION KWH TOTAL BILL
Oct-10 16,017 $2,614
Nov-10 14,804 $2,383
Dec-10 16,971 $2,648
Jan-11 15,098 $2,373
Feb-11 15,043 $2,344
Mar-11 15,283 $2,386
Apr-11 13,553 $2,159
May-11 13,269 $2,081
Jun-11 32,207 $5,409
Jul-11 15,984 $2,935
Aug-11 41,423 $7,198
Sep-11 17,218 $3,251
Totals 226,870 72.9 Max $37,780
AVERAGE DEMAND 50.5 KW average
AVERAGE RATE $0.167 $/kWh
72.9
66.6
35.7
33.3
56.4
68.4
54.9
38.7
38.1
34.8
ELECTRIC USAGE SUMMARY
DEMAND KW
59.4
46.5
Moorestown Township Public Schools – Administrative Building Energy Audit
Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C12019 October 31, 2012– FINAL Page 4 of 18
Figure 1 Electricity Usage Profile
Table 4
Moorestown Township Public Schools – Administrative Building Energy Audit
Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C12019 October 31, 2012– FINAL Page 5 of 18
Natural Gas Billing Data
Utility Provider: PSE&GRate: GSG
Meter No: 2804698Point of Delivery ID: PG000009016739634014
Third Party Utility Provider: HessTPS Meter No:
MONTH OF USECONSUMPTION
(THERMS)TOTAL BILL
Oct-10 12.46 $22.00
Nov-10 163.73 $180.86
Dec-10 732.26 $780.69
Jan-11 914.29 $978.29
Feb-11 848.72 $907.09
Mar-11 550.27 $591.69
Apr-11 365.13 $359.80
May-11 90.25 $94.64
Jun-11 43.53 $47.56
Jul-11 67.16 $72.26
Aug-11 6.20 $25.82
Sep-11 3.11 $11.80
TOTALS 3,797.10 $4,072.50
AVERAGE RATE: $1.07 $/THERM
363677 / 360805
NATURAL GAS USAGE SUMMARY
Moorestown Township Public Schools – Administrative Building Energy Audit
Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C12019 October 31, 2012– FINAL Page 6 of 18
Figure 2 Natural Gas Usage Profile
Moorestown Township Public Schools – Administrative Building Energy Audit
Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C12019 October 31, 2012– FINAL Page 7 of 18
II. FACILITY DESCRIPTION
The Administrative Building is located on 803 North Stanwick Road in Moorestown, New Jersey. The 8,550 SF Administrative Building was built in 1972 with no renovations or additions. The building is single story building and is comprised of office space for administrative use.
Occupancy Profile
The typical hours of operation for Administrative Building are Monday through Friday between 7:30 am and 6:00 pm. The office building has a total occupancy of 25 people.
Building Envelope
Exterior walls for the Administrative Building are brick faced with a concrete block construction. The amount of insulation within the walls is unknown. The windows throughout the office building are in good condition and appear to be maintained. Typical windows throughout the office building are double pane, ¼” clear glass with aluminum frames. Blinds are utilized throughout the school per occupant comfort. The blinds are valuable because they help to reduce heat loss in the winter and reduce solar heat in the summer. The roof is a flat, built up rubber roof where the HVAC equipment resides. The amount of insulation below the roof is unknown.
HVAC Systems
The administrative building is conditioned by packaged rooftop units, split systems and hot water baseboard.
The child study, technical services, business office and superintendent are served by Trane packaged rooftop units with direct expansion coils and gas heat. The remaining rooms throughout the building are served by baseboard hot water heat and ventilators.
The copier room and server rooms are conditioned by Mitsubishi 2 and 3 ton mini-split systems for supplemental cooling.
Heating Hot Water for the building is generated by a Weil McLain CGA-4-PION gas fire boiler. The boiler is natural gas fired with input rating of 105 MBH and output rating of 77.
Exhaust System
Air is exhausted from the toilet rooms through the roof exhausters.
HVAC System Controls
The Administrative Building is controlled by individual programmable thermostats.
Moorestown Township Public Schools – Administrative Building Energy Audit
Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C12019 October 31, 2012– FINAL Page 8 of 18
Domestic Hot Water
The main source of domestic hot water for administrative building is a Bradford White 32 MBH gas fired water heater with an integrated storage capacity of 30 gallons.
Lighting
Refer to the Investment Grade lighting Audit Appendix for a detailed list of the lighting throughout the facility and estimated operating hours per space.
Moorestown Township Public Schools – Administrative Building Energy Audit
Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C12019 October 31, 2012– FINAL Page 9 of 18
III. MAJOR EQUIPMENT LIST
The equipment list contains major energy consuming equipment that through implementation of energy conservation measures could yield substantial energy savings. The list shows the major equipment in the facility and all pertinent information utilized in energy savings calculations. An approximate age was assigned to the equipment in some cases if a manufactures date was not shown on the equipment’s nameplate. The ASHRAE service life for the equipment along with the remaining useful life is also shown in the Appendix.
Refer to the Major Equipment List Appendix for this facility.
Moorestown Township Public Schools – Administrative Building Energy Audit
Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C12019 October 31, 2012– FINAL Page 10 of 18
IV. ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES Energy Conservation Measures are developed specifically for this facility. The energy savings and calculations are highly dependent on the information received from the site survey and interviews with operations personnel. The assumptions and calculations should be reviewed by the owner to ensure accurate representation of this facility. The following ECMs were analyzed:
Table 1 ECM Financial Summary
ECM #1Domestic Hot Water
Upgrade$1,600 $43 37.2 -67.8%
ECM #2 Lighting Controls Upgrade $2,790 $287 9.7 54.3%
REM #1 7.29 KW PV System $48,255 $3,189 15.1 -0.9%
Notes:
NET INSTALLATION
COSTA
RENEWABLE ENERGY MEASURES (REM's)
ECM NO.
DESCRIPTIONNET
INSTALLATION COST
ANNUAL
SAVINGSB
ANNUAL SAVINGS
SIMPLE PAYBACK
(Yrs)
SIMPLE LIFETIME
ROI
A. Cost takes into consideration applicable NJ Smart StartTM incentives.B. Savings takes into consideration applicable maintenance savings.
ECM NO.
DESCRIPTIONSIMPLE
PAYBACK (Yrs)
SIMPLE LIFETIME
ROI
ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES (ECM's)
Moorestown Township Public Schools – Administrative Building Energy Audit
Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C12019 October 31, 2012– FINAL Page 11 of 18
Table 2 ECM Energy Summary
ECM #1Domestic Hot Water
Upgrade0.0 0 40
ECM #2 Lighting Controls Upgrade 0 1,719 0
REM #1 7.29 KW PV System 7.3 8,906 0
ECM NO.
DESCRIPTION
ANNUAL UTILITY REDUCTION
ECM NO.
DESCRIPTION
ANNUAL UTILITY REDUCTION
RENEWABLE ENERGY MEASURES (REM's)
NATURAL GAS (THERMS)
ELECTRIC DEMAND
(KW)
NATURAL GAS (THERMS)
ELECTRIC CONSUMPTION
(KWH)
ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES (ECM's)
ELECTRIC DEMAND
(KW)
ELECTRIC CONSUMPTION
(KWH)
Moorestown Township Public Schools – Administrative Building Energy Audit
Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C12019 October 31, 2012– FINAL Page 12 of 18
Table 3 Facility Project Summary
Design / Construction Extras is shown as an additional cost for the facility project summary. This cost is included to estimate the costs associated with construction management fees for a larger combined project.
Domestic Hot Water Upgrade
$43 $1,900 $300 $1,600 37.2
Lighting Controls Upgrade $287 $3,100 $310 $2,790 9.7
Design / Construction Extras (15%)
$0 $750 $0 $750
Total Project $330 $5,750 $610 $5,140 16
ENERGY SAVINGS IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM - POTENTIAL PROJECT
SIMPLE PAYBACK
ENERGY CONSERVATION
MEASURES
ANNUAL ENERGY
SAVINGS ($)
PROJECT COST ($)
SMART START
INCENTIVES
CUSTOMER COST
Moorestown Township Public Schools – Administrative Building Energy Audit
Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C12019 October 31, 2012– FINAL Page 13 of 18
ECM #1: High Efficiency Gas Hot Water Heater
Description: The Moorestown Administrative Building’s main domestic supply comes from one Bradford White 32 MBH gas fired heater with a 30 gallon integrated storage tank. This heater has recently reached its ASHRAE service life of 12 years and should be replaced with a new high efficiency model. This ECM will replace the gas fired Bradford White with a 96% thermal efficient Everhot HE tank-less natural gas fired 9.5 MBH to 157 MBH boiler. Energy Savings Calculations:
ECM INPUTS EXISTING PROPOSED SAVINGS
ECM INPUTSExisting Electric Hot
Water HeatersHigh Efficiency
Heaters
Building Type Office
Building Square-foot 8,550 8,550
Domestic Water Usage, kBtu 13,680.00 13,680.00
DHW Heating Fuel Type Gas Gas
Heating Efficiency 75% 96% 21%
Total Usage (kBTU) 18,240 14,250 3,990
Nat Gas Cost ($/Therm) $ 1.070 $ 1.070
ECM RESULTS EXISTING PROPOSED SAVINGS
Natural Gas Usage (Therms) 182 143 40
Energy Cost ($) $195 $152 $43
COMMENTS: Savings are based on Energy Information Administration Commercial Building Energy Consumption Survey 2003 Information
ENERGY SAVINGS CALCULATIONS
DOM. HOT WATER HEATER CALCULATIONS
Moorestown Township Public Schools – Administrative Building Energy Audit
Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C12019 October 31, 2012– FINAL Page 14 of 18
Energy Density for “Office” type building = 1.6 kBtu / SF / year
)(SFFootageSquareBuildingSF
yrkBtuDensityEnergyUsageHeatDHW
UnitFuel
BTUValueHeatFuelEffHeating
BtuConsHeatHWDomUsageTotalDHW
%.
.
UnitFuelCostFuelAveUnitsFuelUsageFuelHeatingCostEnergy
$
Energy Savings Summary:
Installation Cost ($): $1,900
NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $300
Net Installation Cost ($): $1,600
Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0
Energy Savings ($/Yr): $43
Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $43
Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 12
Simple Payback 37.2
Simple Lifetime ROI -67.8%
Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $0
Simple Lifetime Savings $516
Internal Rate of Return (IRR) -14%
Net Present Value (NPV) ($1,171.98)
ECM #1 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY
Moorestown Township Public Schools – Administrative Building Energy Audit
Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C12019 October 31, 2012– FINAL Page 15 of 18
ECM #2: Lighting Controls Upgrade – Occupancy Sensors Description: Some of the lights in the Administrative Building left on unnecessarily. In many cases the lights are left on because of the inconvenience to manually switch lights off when a room is left or on when a room is first occupied. This is common in rooms that are occupied for only short periods and only a few times per day. In some instances lights are left on due to the misconception that it is better to keep the lights on rather than to continuously switch lights on and off. Although increased switching reduces lamp life, the energy savings outweigh the lamp replacement costs. The payback timeframe for when to turn the lights off is approximately two minutes. If the lights are expected to be off for at least a two minute interval, then it pays to shut them off.
Lighting controls come in many forms. Sometimes an additional switch is adequate to provide reduced lighting levels when full light output is not needed. Occupancy sensors detect motion and will switch the lights on when the room is occupied. Occupancy sensors can either be mounted in place of a current wall switch, or on the ceiling to cover large areas. The U.S. Department of Energy sponsored a study to analyze energy savings achieved through various types of building system controls. The referenced savings is based on the “Advanced Sensors and Controls for Building Applications: Market Assessment and Potential R&D Pathways,” document posted for public use April 2005. The study has found that commercial buildings have the potential to achieve significant energy savings through the use of building controls. The average energy savings are as follows based on the report:
Occupancy Sensors for Lighting Control 20% - 28% energy savings.
Savings resulting from the implementation of this ECM for energy management controls are estimated to be 20% of the total light energy controlled by occupancy sensors (The majority of the savings is expected to be after school hours when rooms are left with lights on) This ECM includes installation of ceiling or switch mount sensors for individual offices, classrooms, large bathrooms, and Media Centers. Sensors shall be manufactured by Sensorswitch, Watt Stopper or equivalent. The Investment Grade Lighting Audit Appendix of this report includes the summary of lighting controls implemented in this ECM and outlines the proposed controls, costs, savings, and payback periods. The calculations adjust the lighting power usage by the applicable percent savings for each area that includes lighting controls. Energy Savings Calculations:
kWh/YrEnergyLightControlledSavings%SavingsEnergy
kWh
$CostElecAvekWhSavingsEnergySavings.
Moorestown Township Public Schools – Administrative Building Energy Audit
Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C12019 October 31, 2012– FINAL Page 16 of 18
Rebates and Incentives:
From the NJ Smart Start® Program Incentives Appendix, the installation of a lighting control device warrants the following incentive: SmartStartIncentive
#Wallmountsensors $20persensor#Ceilingmountsensors $35persensor
Energy Savings Summary:
Installation Cost ($): $3,100
NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $310
Net Installation Cost ($): $2,790
Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0
Energy Savings ($/Yr): $287
Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $287
Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 15
Simple Payback 9.7
Simple Lifetime ROI 54.3%
Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $0
Simple Lifetime Savings $4,305
Internal Rate of Return (IRR) 6%
Net Present Value (NPV) $636.19
ECM #2 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY
Moorestown Township Public Schools – Administrative Building Energy Audit
Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C12019 October 31, 2012– FINAL Page 17 of 18
REM #1: 7.29 kW Solar System Description: The Administrative Building has available roof space that could accommodate a significant amount of solar generation. Based on the available areas a 7.29 kilowatt solar array could be installed, assuming the existing roof structure is capable of supporting an array. The array will produce approximately 8,906 kilowatt-hours annually that will reduce the overall electric usage of the facility by 3.89%. Energy Savings Calculations: See Renewable / Distributed Energy Measures Calculations Appendix for detailed financial summary and proposed solar layout areas. Financial results in table below are based on 100% financing of the system over a fifteen year period. Energy Savings Summary:
System Size (KWDC): 7.29
Electric Generation (KWH/Yr): 8,906
Installation Cost ($): $48,255
SREC Revenue ($/Yr): $1,702
Energy Savings ($/Yr): $1,487
Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $3,189
ECM Analysis Period (Yr): 15
Simple Payback (Yrs): 15.1
Analysis Period Electric Savings ($): $27,662
Analysis Period SREC Revenue ($): $24,653
Net Present Value (NPV) ($16,077.88)
REM #1 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY
Moorestown Township Public Schools – Administrative Building Energy Audit
Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C12019 October 31, 2012– FINAL Page 18 of 18
V. ADDITIONAL RECOMMENDATIONS The following recommendations include no cost/low cost measures, Operation & Maintenance (O&M) items, and water conservation measures with attractive paybacks. These measures are not eligible for the Smart Start Buildings incentives from the office of Clean Energy but save energy none the less.
A. Chemically clean the condenser and evaporator coils periodically to optimize efficiency. Poorly maintained heat transfer surfaces can reduce efficiency 5-10%.
B. Maintain all weather stripping on windows and doors.
C. Clean all light fixtures to maximize light output.
D. Provide more frequent air filter changes to decrease overall system power usage and maintain better IAQ.
E. Turn off computers when not in use. Ensure computers are not running in screen saver mode which saves the monitor screen not energy.
F. Ensure outside air dampers are functioning properly and only open during occupied mode.
Appendix Energy Audit
Concord Engineering Group, Inc.
APPENDIX A
APPENDIX A1 of 1
LIFETIME ENERGY SAVINGS
LIFETIME MAINTENANCE
SAVINGSLIFETIME ROI SIMPLE PAYBACK
INTERNAL RATE OF RETURN (IRR)
NET PRESENT VALUE (NPV)
MATERIAL LABORREBATES,
INCENTIVES
NET INSTALLATION
COSTENERGY MAINT. / SREC TOTAL (Yearly Saving * ECM Lifetime)
(Yearly Maint Svaing * ECM Lifetime)
(Lifetime Savings - Net Cost) / (Net Cost)
(Net cost / Yearly Savings)
($) ($) ($) ($) ($/Yr) ($/Yr) ($/Yr) (Yr) ($) ($) (%) (Yr) ($) ($)
ECM #1 Domestic Hot Water Upgrade $1,400 $500 $300 $1,600 $43 $0 $43 12 $516 $0 -67.8% 37.2 -14.20% ($1,171.98)
ECM #2 Lighting Controls Upgrade $2,550 $550 $310 $2,790 $287 $0 $287 15 $4,305 $0 54.3% 9.7 5.99% $636.19
REM #1 7.29 KW PV System $48,255 $0 $0 $48,255 $1,487 $1,702 $3,189 15 $47,837 $25,527 -0.9% 15.1 -0.11% ($10,183.45)
Notes: 1) The variable Cn in the formulas for Internal Rate of Return and Net Present Value stands for the cash flow during each period.2) The variable DR in the NPV equation stands for Discount Rate3) For NPV and IRR calculations: From n=0 to N periods where N is the lifetime of ECM and Cn is the cash flow during each period .
REM RENEWABLE ENERGY AND FINANCIAL COSTS AND SAVINGS SUMMARY
ECM COST & SAVINGS BREAKDOWN
CONCORD ENGINEERING GROUP
Moorestown Public Schools - Administrative Building
INSTALLATION COST YEARLY SAVINGS
ECM LIFETIMEDESCRIPTIONECM NO.
ECM ENERGY AND FINANCIAL COSTS AND SAVINGS SUMMARY
Appendix Energy Audit
Concord Engineering Group, Inc.
APPENDIX B
Appendix B Page 1 of 4
Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 520 BURNT MILL ROAD VOORHEES, NEW JERSEY 08043 PHONE: (856) 427-0200 FAX: (856) 427-6508
SmartStart Building Incentives The NJ SmartStart Buildings Program offers financial incentives on a wide variety of building system equipment. The incentives were developed to help offset the initial cost of energy-efficient equipment. The following tables show the current available incentives as of February 15, 2011:
Electric Chillers Water-Cooled Chillers $12 - $170 per ton
Air-Cooled Chillers $8 - $52 per ton
Energy Efficiency must comply with ASHRAE 90.1-2007
Gas Cooling Gas Absorption Chillers $185 - $400 per ton
Gas Engine-Driven Chillers Calculated through custom measure
path)
Desiccant Systems $1.00 per cfm – gas or electric
Electric Unitary HVAC Unitary AC and Split Systems $73 - $92 per ton
Air-to-Air Heat Pumps $73 - $92 per ton Water-Source Heat Pumps $81 per ton
Packaged Terminal AC & HP $65 per ton Central DX AC Systems $40- $72 per ton
Dual Enthalpy Economizer Controls $250 Occupancy Controlled Thermostat
(Hospitality & Institutional Facility) $75 per thermostat
Energy Efficiency must comply with ASHRAE 90.1-2007
Gas Heating
Gas Fired Boilers < 300 MBH $300 per unit
Gas Fired Boilers ≥ 300 - 1500 MBH $1.75 per MBH
Gas Fired Boilers ≥1500 - ≤ 4000 MBH $1.00 per MBH
Gas Fired Boilers > 4000 MBH (Calculated through Custom Measure
Path)
Gas Furnaces $300 - $400 per unit, AFUE ≥ 92%
Appendix B Page 2 of 4
Ground Source Heat Pumps
Closed Loop $450 per ton, EER ≥ 16 $600 per ton, EER ≥ 18 $750 per ton, EER ≥ 20
Energy Efficiency must comply with ASHRAE 90.1-2007
Variable Frequency Drives Variable Air Volume $65 - $155 per hp
Chilled-Water Pumps $60 per VFD rated hp
Compressors $5,250 to $12,500 per drive
Cooling Towers ≥ 10 hp $60 per VFD rated hp
Natural Gas Water Heating
Gas Water Heaters ≤ 50 gallons, 0.67 energy factor or better
$50 per unit
Gas-Fired Water Heaters > 50 gallons $1.00 - $2.00 per MBH
Gas-Fired Booster Water Heaters $17 - $35 per MBH
Gas Fired Tankless Water Heaters $300 per unit
Prescriptive Lighting Retro fit of T12 to T-5 or T-8 Lamps
w/Electronic Ballast in Existing Facilities
$10 per fixture (1-4 lamps)
Replacement of T12 with new T-5 or T-8 Lamps w/Electronic Ballast in
Existing Facilities $25 per fixture (1-4 lamps)
Replacement of incandescent with screw-in PAR 38 or PAR 30 (CFL)
bulb $7 per bulb
T-8 reduced Wattage (28w/25w 4’, 1-4 lamps)
Lamp & ballast replacement $10 per fixture
Hard-Wired Compact Fluorescent $25 - $30 per fixture
Metal Halide w/Pulse Start Including Parking Lot
$25 per fixture
T-5 and T-8 High Bay Fixtures $16 - $200 per fixture
HID ≥ 100w Retrofit with induction lamp, power coupler and generator
(must be 30% less watts/fixture than HID system)
$50 per fixture
HID ≥ 100w Replacement with new HID ≥ 100w
$70 per fixture
Appendix B Page 3 of 4
Prescriptive Lighting - LED
LED New Exit Sign Fixture Existing Facility < 75 kw Existing Facility > 75 kw
$20 per fixture $10 per fixture
LED Display Case Lighting $30 per display case
LED Shelf-Mtd. Display & Task Lights $15 per linear foot
LED Portable Desk Lamp $20 per fixture
LED Wall-wash Lights $30 per fixture
LED Recessed Down Lights $35 per fixture LED Outdoor Pole/Arm-Mounted Area
and Roadway Luminaries $175 per fixture
LED Outdoor Pole/Arm-Mounted Decorative Luminaries
$175 per fixture
LED Outdoor Wall-Mounted Area Luminaries
$100 per fixture
LED Parking Garage Luminaries $100 per fixture
LED Track or Mono-Point Directional Lighting Fixtures
$50 per fixture
LED High-Bay and Low-Bay Fixtures for Commercial & Industrial Bldgs.
$150 per fixture
LED High-Bay-Aisle Lighting $150 per fixture
LED Bollard Fixtures $50 per fixture
LED Linear Panels (2x2 Troffers only) $100 per fixture
LED Fuel Pump Canopy $100 per fixture
LED Refrigerator/Freezer case lighting replacement of fluorescent in medium
and low temperature display case
$42 per 5 foot $65 per 6 foot
Appendix B Page 4 of 4
Lighting Controls – Occupancy Sensors
Wall Mounted $20 per control Remote Mounted $35 per control
Daylight Dimmers $25 per fixture
Occupancy Controlled hi-low Fluorescent Controls
$25 per fixture controlled
Lighting Controls – HID or Fluorescent Hi-Bay Controls Occupancy hi-low $75 per fixture controlled Daylight Dimming $75 per fixture controlled
Daylight Dimming - office $50 per fixture controlled
Premium Motors Three-Phase Motors $45 - $700 per motor
Fractional HP Motors Electronic Communicated Motors (replacing shaded pole motors in
refrigerator/freezer cases)
$40 per electronic communicated motor
Other Equipment Incentives
Performance Lighting
$1.00 per watt per SF below program incentive threshold, currently 5% more energy efficient than ASHRAE 90.1-
2007 for New Construction and Complete Renovation
Custom Electric and Gas Equipment Incentives
not prescriptive
Custom Measures
$0.16 KWh and $1.60/Therm of 1st year savings, or a buy down to a 1 year
payback on estimated savings. Minimum required savings of 75,000 KWh or 1,500 Therms and a IRR of at
least 10%. Multi Measures Bonus 15%
Appendix Energy Audit
Concord Engineering Group, Inc.
APPENDIX C
OMB No. 2060-0347
STATEMENT OF ENERGY PERFORMANCE7-Moorestown BOE - Administrative Building
Building ID: 3221168 For 12-month Period Ending: September 30, 20111
Date SEP becomes ineligible: N/A Date SEP Generated: August 01, 2012
Facility7-Moorestown BOE - AdministrativeBuilding803 North Stanwick RoadMoorestown, NJ 08057
Facility OwnerMoorestown Township Public Schools803 North Stanwick Road Moorestown, NJ 08057
Primary Contact for this FacilityLynn Shugars803 North Stanwick Road Moorestown, NJ 08057
Year Built: 1972Gross Floor Area (ft2): 8,550
Energy Performance Rating2 (1-100) 5
Site Energy Use Summary3
Electricity - Grid Purchase(kBtu) 774,080 Natural Gas (kBtu)4 379,711 Total Energy (kBtu) 1,153,791
Energy Intensity4 Site (kBtu/ft2/yr) 135 Source (kBtu/ft2/yr) 349 Emissions (based on site energy use) Greenhouse Gas Emissions (MtCO2e/year) 130 Electric Distribution Utility Public Service Electric & Gas Co National Median Comparison National Median Site EUI 71 National Median Source EUI 184 % Difference from National Median Source EUI 90% Building Type Office
Stamp of Certifying Professional
Based on the conditions observed at thetime of my visit to this building, I certify that
the information contained within thisstatement is accurate.
Meets Industry Standards5 for Indoor EnvironmentalConditions:Ventilation for Acceptable Indoor Air Quality N/A Acceptable Thermal Environmental Conditions N/A Adequate Illumination N/A
Certifying ProfessionalMichael Fischette520 South Burnt Mill Road Voorhees, NJ 08043
Notes: 1. Application for the ENERGY STAR must be submitted to EPA within 4 months of the Period Ending date. Award of the ENERGY STAR is not final until approval is received from EPA.2. The EPA Energy Performance Rating is based on total source energy. A rating of 75 is the minimum to be eligible for the ENERGY STAR.3. Values represent energy consumption, annualized to a 12-month period.4. Values represent energy intensity, annualized to a 12-month period.5. Based on Meeting ASHRAE Standard 62 for ventilation for acceptable indoor air quality, ASHRAE Standard 55 for thermal comfort, and IESNA Lighting Handbook for lighting quality.
The government estimates the average time needed to fill out this form is 6 hours (includes the time for entering energy data, Licensed Professional facility inspection, and notarizing the SEP) andwelcomes suggestions for reducing this level of effort. Send comments (referencing OMB control number) to the Director, Collection Strategies Division, U.S., EPA (2822T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.,NW, Washington, D.C. 20460.
EPA Form 5900-16
ENERGY STAR®
Data Checklistfor Commercial Buildings
In order for a building to qualify for the ENERGY STAR, a Professional Engineer (PE) or a Registered Architect (RA) must validate the accuracy of the data underlyingthe building's energy performance rating. This checklist is designed to provide an at-a-glance summary of a property's physical and operating characteristics, as well asits total energy consumption, to assist the PE or RA in double-checking the information that the building owner or operator has entered into Portfolio Manager.
Please complete and sign this checklist and include it with the stamped, signed Statement of Energy Performance.NOTE: You must check each box to indicate that each value is correct, OR include a note.
CRITERION VALUE AS ENTERED INPORTFOLIO MANAGER VERIFICATION QUESTIONS NOTES
Building Name 7-Moorestown BOE -
Administrative Building Is this the official building name to be displayed inthe ENERGY STAR Registry of LabeledBuildings?
Type Office Is this an accurate description of the space inquestion?
Location 803 North Stanwick Road,
Moorestown, NJ 08057 Is this address accurate and complete? Correctweather normalization requires an accurate zipcode.
Single Structure Single Facility
Does this SEP represent a single structure? SEPscannot be submitted for multiple-buildingcampuses (with the exception of a hospital, k-12school, hotel and senior care facility) nor can theybe submitted as representing only a portion of abuilding.
Administrative Building (Office)
CRITERION VALUE AS ENTERED INPORTFOLIO MANAGER VERIFICATION QUESTIONS NOTES
Gross Floor Area 8,550 Sq. Ft.
Does this square footage include all supportingfunctions such as kitchens and break rooms usedby staff, storage areas, administrative areas,elevators, stairwells, atria, vent shafts, etc. Alsonote that existing atriums should only include thebase floor area that it occupies. Interstitial(plenum) space between floors should not beincluded in the total. Finally gross floor area is notthe same as leasable space. Leasable space is asubset of gross floor area.
Weekly operatinghours 55 Hours
Is this the total number of hours per week that theOffice space is 75% occupied? This numbershould exclude hours when the facility is occupiedonly by maintenance, security, or other supportpersonnel. For facilities with a schedule that variesduring the year, "operating hours/week" refers tothe total weekly hours for the schedule most oftenfollowed.
Workers on MainShift 25
Is this the number of employees present during themain shift? Note this is not the total number ofemployees or visitors who are in a building duringan entire 24 hour period. For example, if there aretwo daily 8 hour shifts of 100 workers each, theWorkers on Main Shift value is 100. The normalworker density ranges between 0.3 and 5.3workers per 1000 square feet (92.8 squaremeters)
Number of PCs 25 Is this the number of personal computers in theOffice?
Percent Cooled 50% or more Is this the percentage of the total floor space withinthe facility that is served by mechanical coolingequipment?
Percent Heated 50% or more Is this the percentage of the total floor space withinthe facility that is served by mechanical heatingequipment?
Page 1 of 3
ENERGY STAR®
Data Checklistfor Commercial Buildings
Energy ConsumptionPower Generation Plant or Distribution Utility: Public Service Electric & Gas Co
Fuel Type: Electricity
Meter: electric (kWh (thousand Watt-hours))Space(s): Entire Facility
Generation Method: Grid Purchase
Start Date End Date Energy Use (kWh (thousand Watt-hours))
09/01/2011 09/30/2011 17,218.00
08/01/2011 08/31/2011 41,423.00
07/01/2011 07/31/2011 15,984.00
06/01/2011 06/30/2011 32,207.00
05/01/2011 05/31/2011 13,269.00
04/01/2011 04/30/2011 13,553.00
03/01/2011 03/31/2011 15,283.00
02/01/2011 02/28/2011 15,043.00
01/01/2011 01/31/2011 15,098.00
12/01/2010 12/31/2010 16,971.00
11/01/2010 11/30/2010 14,804.00
10/01/2010 10/31/2010 16,017.00
electric Consumption (kWh (thousand Watt-hours)) 226,870.00
electric Consumption (kBtu (thousand Btu)) 774,080.44
Total Electricity (Grid Purchase) Consumption (kBtu (thousand Btu)) 774,080.44
Is this the total Electricity (Grid Purchase) consumption at this building including allElectricity meters?
Fuel Type: Natural Gas
Meter: gas (therms)Space(s): Entire Facility
Start Date End Date Energy Use (therms)
09/01/2011 09/30/2011 3.11
08/01/2011 08/31/2011 6.20
07/01/2011 07/31/2011 67.16
06/01/2011 06/30/2011 43.53
05/01/2011 05/31/2011 90.25
04/01/2011 04/30/2011 365.13
03/01/2011 03/31/2011 550.27
02/01/2011 02/28/2011 848.72
01/01/2011 01/31/2011 914.29
12/01/2010 12/31/2010 732.26
Page 2 of 3
11/01/2010 11/30/2010 163.73
10/01/2010 10/31/2010 12.46
gas Consumption (therms) 3,797.11
gas Consumption (kBtu (thousand Btu)) 379,711.00
Total Natural Gas Consumption (kBtu (thousand Btu)) 379,711.00
Is this the total Natural Gas consumption at this building including all Natural Gas meters?
Additional FuelsDo the fuel consumption totals shown above represent the total energy use of this building?Please confirm there are no additional fuels (district energy, generator fuel oil) used in this facility.
On-Site Solar and Wind EnergyDo the fuel consumption totals shown above include all on-site solar and/or wind power located atyour facility? Please confirm that no on-site solar or wind installations have been omitted from thislist. All on-site systems must be reported.
Certifying Professional (When applying for the ENERGY STAR, the Certifying Professional must be the same PE or RA that signed and stamped the SEP.)
Name: _____________________________________________ Date: _____________
Signature: ______________________________________ Signature is required when applying for the ENERGY STAR.
Page 3 of 3
FOR YOUR RECORDS ONLY. DO NOT SUBMIT TO EPA.
Please keep this Facility Summary for your own records; do not submit it to EPA. Only the Statement of Energy Performance(SEP), Data Checklist and Letter of Agreement need to be submitted to EPA when applying for the ENERGY STAR.
Facility7-Moorestown BOE - AdministrativeBuilding803 North Stanwick RoadMoorestown, NJ 08057
Facility OwnerMoorestown Township Public Schools803 North Stanwick Road Moorestown, NJ 08057
Primary Contact for this FacilityLynn Shugars803 North Stanwick Road Moorestown, NJ 08057
General Information7-Moorestown BOE - Administrative Building
Gross Floor Area Excluding Parking: (ft2) 8,550 Year Built 1972 For 12-month Evaluation Period Ending Date: September 30, 2011
Facility Space Use SummaryAdministrative Building
Space Type Office
Gross Floor Area (ft2) 8,550
Weekly operating hours 55
Workers on Main Shift 25
Number of PCs 25
Percent Cooled 50% or more
Percent Heated 50% or more
Energy Performance ComparisonEvaluation Periods Comparisons
Performance Metrics Current(Ending Date 09/30/2011)
Baseline(Ending Date 09/30/2011) Rating of 75 Target National Median
Energy Performance Rating 5 5 75 N/A 50
Energy Intensity
Site (kBtu/ft2) 135 135 53 N/A 71
Source (kBtu/ft2) 349 349 136 N/A 184
Energy Cost
$/year N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
$/ft2/year N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
MtCO2e/year 130 130 51 N/A 68
kgCO2e/ft2/year 15 15 6 N/A 8
More than 50% of your building is defined as Office. Please note that your rating accounts for all of the spaces listed. The National Median column presents energyperformance data your building would have if your building had a median rating of 50. Notes:o - This attribute is optional.d - A default value has been supplied by Portfolio Manager.
20117-Moorestown BOE - Administrative Building803 North Stanwick RoadMoorestown, NJ 08057
Portfolio Manager Building ID: 3221168
The energy use of this building has been measured and compared to other similar buildings using theEnvironmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) Energy Performance Scale of 1–100, with 1 being the least energyefficient and 100 the most energy efficient. For more information, visit energystar.gov/benchmark.
This building’sscore
5
100
Most Efficient
This building uses 349 kBtu per square foot per year.*
*Based on source energy intensity for the 12 month period ending September 2011
Date of certification
Date Generated: 08/01/2012
Statement ofEnergy Performance
1
Least Efficient
50
Median
Buildings with a score of75 or higher may qualifyfor EPA’s ENERGY STAR.
I certify that the information contained within this statement is accurate and in accordance with U.S.Environmental Protection Agency’s measurement standards, found at energystar.gov
Appendix Energy Audit
Concord Engineering Group, Inc.
APPENDIX D
Appendix D
Page 1 of 4
AC UnitsTag RTU-1 RTU-2 RTU-3
Unit Type Packaged Rooftop Packaged Rooftop Packaged Rooftop
Qty 1 1 1
Location Roof Roof Roof
Area ServedChild Study, Technical
ServicesBusiness Superintendant
Manufacturer York York York
Model # DICG180N24025ECA DICG180N24025ECA DINA030N05606A
Serial # NEXM125260 NEXM125261 NDFM051435
Cooling Type DX, R-22 DX, R-22 DX, R-22
Cooling Capacity (Tons) 15 Tons 15 Tons 2 1/2 Tons
Cooling Efficiency (SEER/EER)
9 EER 9 EER 10 SEER
Heating Type Gas HX Gas HX Gas HX
Heating Input (MBH) 240 MBH 240 MBH 56 MBH
Efficiency 80% 80% 80%
Fuel Nat Gas Nat Gas Nat Gas
Approx Age 12 12 12
ASHRAE Service Life 15 15 15
Remaining Life 3 3 3
Comments
Note:
MAJOR EQUIPMENT LISTConcord Engineering Group
Moorestown Administrative Building
"N/A" = Not Applicable. "-" = Info Not Available
Appendix D
Page 2 of 4
AC UnitsTag
Unit Type
Qty
Location
Area Served
Manufacturer
Model #
Serial #
Cooling Type
Cooling Capacity (Tons)
Cooling Efficiency (SEER/EER)
Heating Type
Heating Input (MBH)
Efficiency
Fuel
Approx Age
ASHRAE Service Life
Remaining Life
Comments
Note:
"N/A" = Not Applicable. "-" = Info Not Available
SP/AC-1 SP/AC-2 SP/AC-3
Split System Split System Split System
1 1 1
Roof Roof Roof
Copier Room Server Room Server Room
Mitsubishi Mitsubishi Mitsubishi
PU-24G6 PL36AK PL36AK
05001264C S 44A000150 44A000170
DX, R-22 DX, R-22 DX, R-22
2 Tons 3 Tons 3 Tons
10 SEER 10 SEER 10 SEER
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
12 12 12
15 15 15
3 3 3
Appendix D
Page 3 of 4
BoilersTag
Unit Type Gas Fired Boiler
Qty 1
Location Outside Mech Room
Area Served Admin Bldg
Manufacturer Weil McLain
Model # CGA-4-PION
Serial # 1
Input Capacity (Btu/Hr) 105 MBH
Rated Output Capacity (Btu/Hr)
77 MBH
Approx. Efficiency % 80.0%
Fuel Natural Gas
Approx Age 7
ASHRAE Service Life 24
Remaining Life 17
Comments
Note:
MAJOR EQUIPMENT LIST
Concord Engineering Group
Moorestown Administrative Building
"N/A" = Not Applicable. "-" = Info Not Available
Appendix D
Page 4 of 4
Domestic Water HeatersTag
Unit TypeGas Fired Domestic Hot Water Heater
Qty 1
Location Outside Mech Room
Area Served Admin Bldg
Manufacturer Bradford White
Model # MI30T6EN10
Serial # WM2873179
Size (Gallons) 30 Gallons
Input Capacity (MBH/KW)
32 MBH
Recovery (Gal/Hr) -
Efficiency % 80%
Fuel Natural Gas
Approx Age 12
ASHRAE Service Life 12
Remaining Life 0
Comments
Note:
MAJOR EQUIPMENT LIST
Concord Engineering Group
Moorestown Administrative Building
"N/A" = Not Applicable. "-" = Info Not Available
Appendix Energy Audit
Concord Engineering Group, Inc.
APPENDIX E
CEG Project #:
Facility Name:
Address:
City, State, Zip
Fixture Reference #
LocationAverage
Burn Hours
DescriptionLamps per
FixtureWatts per
FixtureQty of
FixturesTotal kW
Usage kWh/Yr
Work Description Equipment DescriptionLamps per
FixtureWatts per
FixtureQty of
FixturesTotal kW
Usage kWh/Yr
Energy Savings,
kW
Energy Savings,
kWh
Energy Savings, $
Control Ref #
Controls DescriptionQty of
Controls
Hour Reduction
%
Energy Savings,
kWh
Energy Savings, $
222.21 Open Office Area 26002x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed
Mnt., Prismatic Lens2 62 7 0.43 1,128 Existing to Remain Existing to Remain 2 62 0 0.43 1,128 0.00 0 $0 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0
222.21 Hall 30002x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed
Mnt., Prismatic Lens2 62 3 0.19 558 Existing to Remain Existing to Remain 2 62 0 0.19 558 0.00 0 $0 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0
222.21 Back Hall 30002x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed
Mnt., Prismatic Lens2 62 7 0.43 1,302 Existing to Remain Existing to Remain 2 62 0 0.43 1,302 0.00 0 $0 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0
222.21 Storage 6002x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed
Mnt., Prismatic Lens2 62 2 0.12 74 Existing to Remain Existing to Remain 2 62 0 0.12 74 0.00 0 $0 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0
222.21 Side Offices (4) 26002x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed
Mnt., Prismatic Lens2 62 9 0.56 1,451 Existing to Remain Existing to Remain 2 62 0 0.56 1,451 0.00 0 $0 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0
222.21 Reception 26002x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed
Mnt., Prismatic Lens2 62 4 0.25 645 Existing to Remain Existing to Remain 2 62 0 0.25 645 0.00 0 $0 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0
222.21 Open Office Are 26002x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed
Mnt., Prismatic Lens2 62 11 0.68 1,773 Existing to Remain Existing to Remain 2 62 0 0.68 1,773 0.00 0 $0 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0
222.21 Side Office (5) 26002x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed
Mnt., Prismatic Lens2 62 14 0.87 2,257 Existing to Remain Existing to Remain 2 62 0 0.87 2,257 0.00 0 $0 5
Dual Technology Occupancy Sensor - Switch
Mnt.4 20.0% 451 $75
232.22 Conference Room 26002x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed
Mnt., Parabolic3 86 6 0.52 1,342 Existing to Remain Existing to Remain 3 86 0 0.52 1,342 0.00 0 $0 4
Dual Technology Occupancy Sensor -
Remote Mnt.1 20.0% 268 $45
222.21 Center Offices (2) 26002x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed
Mnt., Prismatic Lens2 62 10 0.62 1,612 Existing to Remain Existing to Remain 2 62 0 0.62 1,612 0.00 0 $0 4
Dual Technology Occupancy Sensor -
Remote Mnt.2 20.0% 322 $54
222.21 Back Offices 9*0 26002x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed
Mnt., Prismatic Lens2 62 16 0.99 2,579 Existing to Remain Existing to Remain 2 62 0 0.99 2,579 0.00 0 $0 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0
222.21 Men's Restroom 12002x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed
Mnt., Prismatic Lens2 62 1 0.06 74 Existing to Remain Existing to Remain 2 62 0 0.06 74 0.00 0 $0 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0
222.21 Women's Restroom 12002x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed
Mnt., Prismatic Lens2 62 1 0.06 74 Existing to Remain Existing to Remain 2 62 0 0.06 74 0.00 0 $0 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0
222.21 It Offices 26002x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed
Mnt., Prismatic Lens2 62 8 0.50 1,290 Existing to Remain Existing to Remain 2 62 0 0.50 1,290 0.00 0 $0 4
Dual Technology Occupancy Sensor -
Remote Mnt.1 20.0% 258 $43
222.21 Servers 26002x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed
Mnt., Prismatic Lens2 62 6 0.37 967 Existing to Remain Existing to Remain 2 62 0 0.37 967 0.00 0 $0 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0
222.21 Copy Room 26002x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed
Mnt., Prismatic Lens2 62 7 0.43 1,128 Existing to Remain Existing to Remain 2 62 0 0.43 1,128 0.00 0 $0 5
Dual Technology Occupancy Sensor - Switch
Mnt.1 20.0% 226 $38
222.21 Electrical Room 6002x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed
Mnt., Prismatic Lens2 62 2 0.12 74 Existing to Remain Existing to Remain 2 62 0 0.12 74 0.00 0 $0 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0
222.21 Front Offices (2) 26002x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed
Mnt., Prismatic Lens2 62 6 0.37 967 Existing to Remain Existing to Remain 2 62 0 0.37 967 0.00 0 $0 4
Dual Technology Occupancy Sensor -
Remote Mnt.2 20.0% 193 $32
TOTAL 120 8 19,297 0 8 19,297 0 0 $0 11 1,719 $287
Retrofit Energy SavingsExisting Fixtures Proposed Fixtures Retrofit
9C12019
Moorestown Administration Building
Proposed Lighting Controls
Appendix E - Lighting Audit - Administration Building.xlsx Page 1
Appendix Energy Audit
Concord Engineering Group, Inc.
APPENDIX F
Appendix FPage 1 of 2
Location Description
Area (Sq FT) Panel Qty
Panel Sq Ft
Panel Total Sq
FtTotal KWDC
Total Annual kWh
Total KWAC
Panel Weight
(41.9 lbs) W/SQFT
Moorestown Administrative
Bldg.775
SHARP NU-U235F2
31 17.5 544 7.29 8,906 5.9 1,299 13.40
.= Proposed PV Layout
Notes:
1. Estimated kWH based on the National Renewable Energy Laboratory PVWatts Version 1 Calculator Program.
Appendix FPage 2 of 2
Project Name: LGEA Solar PV Project - Moorestown Administrative Building
Location: Moorestown, NJDescription: Photovoltaic System 100% Financing - 15 year
Simple Payback Analysis
Total Construction Cost $48,255Annual kWh Production 8,906
Annual Energy Cost Reduction $1,487Average Annual SREC Revenue $1,702
Simple Payback: Years
Life Cycle Cost AnalysisAnalysis Period (years): 15 Financing %: 100%
Discount Rate: 3% Maintenance Escalation Rate: 3.0%Average Energy Cost ($/kWh) $0.167 Energy Cost Escalation Rate: 3.0%
Financing Rate: 6.00% Average SREC Value ($/kWh) $0.191Period Additional Energy kWh Energy Cost Additional SREC Interest Loan Net Cash Cumulative
Cash Outlay Production Savings Maint Costs Revenue Expense Principal Flow Cash Flow0 $0 0 0 0 $0 0 0 0 01 $0 8,906 $1,487 $0 $2,227 $2,840 $2,047 ($1,173) ($1,173)2 $0 8,861 $1,532 $0 $2,215 $2,713 $2,173 ($1,139) ($2,312)3 $0 8,817 $1,578 $0 $2,204 $2,579 $2,307 ($1,104) ($3,416)4 $0 8,773 $1,625 $0 $2,193 $2,437 $2,449 ($1,068) ($4,484)5 $0 8,729 $1,674 $90 $2,182 $2,286 $2,600 ($1,120) ($5,604)6 $0 8,686 $1,724 $89 $1,737 $2,126 $2,761 ($1,515) ($7,119)7 $0 8,642 $1,776 $89 $1,728 $1,955 $2,931 ($1,471) ($8,590)8 $0 8,599 $1,829 $89 $1,720 $1,775 $3,112 ($1,426) ($10,016)9 $0 8,556 $1,884 $88 $1,711 $1,583 $3,304 ($1,379) ($11,395)
10 $0 8,513 $1,941 $88 $1,277 $1,379 $3,508 ($1,757) ($13,151)11 $0 8,471 $1,999 $87 $1,271 $1,162 $3,724 ($1,704) ($14,856)12 $0 8,428 $2,059 $87 $1,264 $933 $3,954 ($1,650) ($16,506)13 $0 8,386 $2,121 $86 $1,258 $689 $4,197 ($1,594) ($18,100)14 $0 8,344 $2,184 $86 $834 $430 $4,456 ($1,954) ($20,054)15 $0 8,302 $2,250 $86 $830 $155 $4,731 ($1,892) ($21,946)
Totals: 129,014 $27,662 $965 $24,653 $25,041 $48,255 ($21,946) ($158,720)Net Present Value (NPV)
Photovoltaic System 100% Financing - 15 year
15.13
($16,078)