9 the Modern State as Imperial State 97

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/25/2019 9 the Modern State as Imperial State 97

    1/19

  • 7/25/2019 9 the Modern State as Imperial State 97

    2/19

    THE MODERN STATE AS

    THE IMPERIAL STATEWeek 9

  • 7/25/2019 9 the Modern State as Imperial State 97

    3/19

    OVERVIEW

  • 7/25/2019 9 the Modern State as Imperial State 97

    4/19

    NATION-STATES

    The emergence of nation-statesin non-European parts of theworld are seen to be part of anatural progression of worldhistory

    This conflates the processes of colonialism andimperialism with the neutral processes ofmodernization

    National identity in the world beyond Europe isusually associated with the struggle againstcolonialism

    However, the colonial question needs to beconsidered as integral to the development of thenation-state within Europe as well

  • 7/25/2019 9 the Modern State as Imperial State 97

    5/19

    THEORIES OF NATIONALISM

    AnthonySmith:ethnicities exist everywhere andso each nation has its origin in its own sharedculture and history

    EricHobsbawm:the invention of mass-national

    traditions to create cohesive communities is aninevitable consequence of the divisions generatedby modern capitalism

    BenedictAnderson:the nationalist demand fora sovereign, limited community arises out of themodern processes of print capitalism

    Emergence in the UK and France, followed byGermany and Italy, then the rest of the world

  • 7/25/2019 9 the Modern State as Imperial State 97

    6/19

    EMERGENCE OF NATION-STATES

  • 7/25/2019 9 the Modern State as Imperial State 97

    7/19

    IMAGINED COMMUNITIES

    When immediate contact doesnot occur then the communitythat exists is an imagined one this is not to imply that it isimaginary

    People imagine others doingthings similar to themselveswithin the same temporal space

    The new development that led to nationalism was the

    emergence of communities based around printedvernacular languages Later versions of nationalism are seen to be pirated/modeled on earlier ones

  • 7/25/2019 9 the Modern State as Imperial State 97

    8/19

    IMAGINED COMMUNITIES

    Latin and North AmericaCreole nationalism where print-men created theidea of the nation in relation to travels to Europe

    Europe

    Vernacular nationalism based on history andlanguage, creating dictionaries, grammars, nationalliteratures

    Eastern Europe and AsiaOfficial nationalisms created by dynastic rulers in anattempt to reassert control in the face of vernacularmovements

    Africa and AsiaColonial nationalism is pirated from all of the above

  • 7/25/2019 9 the Modern State as Imperial State 97

    9/19

    POSTCOLONIAL RESPONSE

    ParthaChatterjeeasks:If nationalisms in the rest of the world have tochoose their imagined community from certainmodular forms already made available to

    them by Europe and the Americas, what dothey have left to imagine?

    Those in the postcolonial world are

    condemned only to be the consumers ofmodernity, never its creators, or authors:Even our imaginations must remain forevercolonized (Chatterjee 1996: 216)

  • 7/25/2019 9 the Modern State as Imperial State 97

    10/19

    THE PROJECT OF THE NATION-

    STATE

  • 7/25/2019 9 the Modern State as Imperial State 97

    11/19

    COLONIAL GOVERNMENTALITY

    Colonial populations were routinely seenas subordinated subjects whose health andresources were objects of legitimateinterest to the colonial government

    The first application of finger printing wasin India in the1860s where it was used bythe colonial government in Bengal

    Vaccination / immunisation programmeswere first instituted in the colonies

    English literature appeared as a subject inthe curriculum of the colonies long before itwas ever institutionalized in the home country(see Viswanathan1989)

  • 7/25/2019 9 the Modern State as Imperial State 97

    12/19

  • 7/25/2019 9 the Modern State as Imperial State 97

    13/19

  • 7/25/2019 9 the Modern State as Imperial State 97

    14/19

    RECONSIDERATIONS

    The interpretation of Britain and France asindependently originary, and others as imitation,is not the only way of understanding thephenomenon of the modern nation-state

    The nation-state emerged in the context of thecolonial state and developments that aregenerally ascribed to one are done so byabstracting phenomena out of the relationshipsand interconnections between them

    By locating the nation-state within the context ofthe wider interconnections would enrich ourunderstandings of particular events as well asthe wider contexts in which they occur

  • 7/25/2019 9 the Modern State as Imperial State 97

    15/19

    ORIGINAL AND THE COPY

    With the assumption of a particular version of

    the nation-state having emerged in 18thcentury

    Europe, and then being modelled or copied by

    others, there is no option but to theorize others in

    relation to that original model and as beingimitations of itas Charles Taylor (1999) argues, all they (that is,

    non-Europeans) want to do is what has already been

    done in the WestThus, distinguishing between the original and

    the copy has implications for the way in which

    different histories are understood and analyzed

  • 7/25/2019 9 the Modern State as Imperial State 97

    16/19

    ORIGINAL AND THE COPY

    Following Foucault (1969) in describing theoriginal, what is taken as important is thehistory of changes and transformationsthe ways in which new forms rose up to produce new

    landscapesThe copy is understood in terms of inertiaa slow accumulation of the pasta sedimentation of things in which what is addressedis what is held in common as opposed to what is

    uniqueThis maps onto the way in which things arevalued with the original being more highlyregarded than the copy, which is mere imitation

  • 7/25/2019 9 the Modern State as Imperial State 97

    17/19

    IN SUM

    When nationalism emerged in the rest of Europethere was no feeling that the nation was notculturally equipped to reach the standards set outby the pace-makers, Britain and France

    Yet, with the emergence of nationalism in otherparts of the world, it was often suggested thatsome time of development and civilization usually colonial rule and education had to passbefore these countries could be considered

    prepared for self-ruleThe refrain of not yet emanates from a historicalconception of cultural progress that justifiescolonial intervention in the name of that progressand, in doing so, denies coevalness with others

  • 7/25/2019 9 the Modern State as Imperial State 97

    18/19

    The difference between being European andbeing Europeanized is the difference thatproduces knowledge as a form of social control inwhich to be Europeanized isemphaticallynot to

    be European (Bhabha)The nation-state emerged as a colonial stateThe writing out of the colonial relationship fromunderstandings of its emergence impoverishesour analyses of it

    The failure to address this complex relationshipis key to the continuing misapprehension aboutthe singularity of modernity and its dispersalglobally from Europe outwards

  • 7/25/2019 9 the Modern State as Imperial State 97

    19/19

    QUESTIONS FOR READING:

    What does it mean to say that modern state

    formation is aculturalproject?

    In which ways is colonialism implicated in the

    project of the nation state?

    In your reading groups, research one example of

    something that you would imagine occurred first

    in Europe, but actually has its roots elsewheree.g. fingerprinting