5

90-1The gain in petal width was smallest near the midvein and in- creased toward the petal margins (Fig. 2B). During expansion, the length to width ratio of the petals remained constant

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 90-1The gain in petal width was smallest near the midvein and in- creased toward the petal margins (Fig. 2B). During expansion, the length to width ratio of the petals remained constant
Page 2: 90-1The gain in petal width was smallest near the midvein and in- creased toward the petal margins (Fig. 2B). During expansion, the length to width ratio of the petals remained constant
Page 3: 90-1The gain in petal width was smallest near the midvein and in- creased toward the petal margins (Fig. 2B). During expansion, the length to width ratio of the petals remained constant
Page 4: 90-1The gain in petal width was smallest near the midvein and in- creased toward the petal margins (Fig. 2B). During expansion, the length to width ratio of the petals remained constant
Page 5: 90-1The gain in petal width was smallest near the midvein and in- creased toward the petal margins (Fig. 2B). During expansion, the length to width ratio of the petals remained constant