71
NON-IDEAL FLOW Residence Time Distribution R. SATISH BABU 1

9.Non Ideal Flow

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

ppt....

Citation preview

Page 1: 9.Non Ideal Flow

NON-IDEAL FLOW

Residence Time Distribution

R. SATISH BABU

1

Page 2: 9.Non Ideal Flow

SCOPE:

•Design of non-ideal reactors

•Identify the possible deviations

•Measurement of RTD

• Quality of mixing

•Models for mixing

•Calculating the exit conversion in practical reactors

2

Page 3: 9.Non Ideal Flow

Practical reactor performance deviates from that of ideal reactor’s :

• Packed bed reactor – Channeling• CSTR & Batch – Dead Zones, Bypass• PFR – deviation from plug flow – dispersion• Deviation in residence times of molecules• the longitudinal mixing caused by vortices and turbulence•Failure of impellers /mixing devices

How to design the Practical reactor ??

What design equation to use ??

Approach: (1) Design ideal reactor

(2) Account/correct for deviations 3

Page 4: 9.Non Ideal Flow

Deviations

In an ideal CSTR, the reactant concentration is uniform throughout the vessel, while in a real stirred tank, the reactant concentration is relatively high at the point where the feed enters and low in the stagnant regions that develop in corners and behind baffles.

In an ideal plug flow reactor, all reactant and product molecules at any given axial position move at the same rate in the direction of the bulk fluid flow. However, in a real plug flow reactor, fluid velocity profiles, turbulent mixing, and molecular diffusion cause molecules to move with changing speeds and in different directions.

The deviations from ideal reactor conditions pose several problems in the design and analysis of reactors.

4

Page 5: 9.Non Ideal Flow

Possible Deviations from ideality:

Short Circuiting or By-Pass – Reactant flows into the tank through the inlet and then directly goes out through the outlet without reacting if the inlet and outlet are close by or if there exists an easy route between the two.

5

Page 6: 9.Non Ideal Flow

1.Dead Zone 2. Short Circuiting

6

Page 7: 9.Non Ideal Flow

7

Page 8: 9.Non Ideal Flow

8

Page 9: 9.Non Ideal Flow

Three concepts are generally used to describe the

deviations from ideality:

• the distribution of residence times (RTD)

• the quality of mixing

• the model used to describe the system

These concepts are regarded as characteristics of Mixing.

9

Page 10: 9.Non Ideal Flow

Analysis of non-ideal reactors is carried out in

three levels:

First Level:

• Model the reactors as ideal and account or

correct for the deviations Second Level:

• Use of macro-mixing information (RTD)

Third Level:

• Use of micro-mixing information – models for

fluid flow behavior10

Page 11: 9.Non Ideal Flow

RTD Function:

• Use of (RTD) in the analysis of non-ideal reactor

performance – Mac Mullin & Weber – 1935

• Dankwerts (1950) – organizational structure

• Levenspiel & Bischoff, Himmelblau & Bischoff,

Wen & Fan, Shinner

• In any reactor there is a distribution of

residence times

• RTD effects the performance of the reactor

• RTD is a characteristic of the mixing 11

Page 12: 9.Non Ideal Flow

Measurement of RTD

RTD is measured experimentally by injecting an inert

matrerial called tracer at t=0 and measuring its

concentration at the exit as a function of time.

Injection & Detection points should be very close to

the reactor12

Page 13: 9.Non Ideal Flow

ASSUMPTIONS

1. Constant flowrate u(l/min) and fluid density ρ(g/l).

2. Only one flowing phase.

3. Closed system input and output by bulk flow only (i.e., no diffusion across the system boundaries).

4. Flat velocity profiles at the inlet and outlet.

5. Linearity with respect to the tracer analysis, that is, the magnitude of the response at the outlet is directly proportional to the amount of tracer injected.

6. The tracer is completely conserved within the system and is identical to the process fluid in its flow and mixing behavior. 13

Page 14: 9.Non Ideal Flow

Desirable characteristics of the tracer:

•non reactive species

•easily detectable

•should have physical properties similar to that of the reacting mixture

•completely soluble in the mixture

•should not adsorb on the walls

•Its molecular diffusivity should be low and should be conserved

•colored and radio active materials are the most widely used tracers 14

Page 15: 9.Non Ideal Flow

Types of tracer inputs:

• Pulse input

• Step input

• Ramp input

• Sinusoidal input

Pulse & Step inputs are most common

Ramp input

15

Page 16: 9.Non Ideal Flow

Pulse input of tracer

In Pulse input N0 moles of tracer is injected in one

shot and the effluent concentration is measured

The amount of material that has spent an amount of

time between t and t+t in the reactor:

N = C(t) v t 16

Page 17: 9.Non Ideal Flow

The fraction of material that has spent an amount of

time between t and t+t in the reactor:

dN = C(t) v dt

0

0 )( dttvCN

For pulse input0

)(N

NttE

0

)(

)()(

dttC

tCtE

17

Page 18: 9.Non Ideal Flow

C curve

1)(0

dttE18

Page 19: 9.Non Ideal Flow

1

0

1

)( ttimeresidenceahavingFractiondttEt

1

1

)( ttimeresidenceahavingFractiondttEt

19

Page 20: 9.Non Ideal Flow

The age of an element is defined as the time elapsed

since it entered the system.

20

Page 21: 9.Non Ideal Flow

1210

0

.......(22

)(

nn CCCCCh

dttC

21

Page 22: 9.Non Ideal Flow

Disadvantages of pulse input

• injection must be done in a very short time

• when the c-curve has a long tail, the analysis

can give rise to inaccuracies

• amount of tracer used should be known

• however, require very small amount of tracer

compared to step input

22

Page 23: 9.Non Ideal Flow

Step input of tracer

In step input the conc. of tracer is kept at this

level till the outlet conc. equals the inlet conc.

t

out dttECC0

0 )(

23

Page 24: 9.Non Ideal Flow

stepC

tC

dt

dtE

0

)()(

For step input:

Disadvantages of Step input:

• difficult to maintain a constant tracer conc.

• RTD fn requires differentiation – can lead

to errors

• large amount of tracer is required

• need not know the amount of tracer used24

Page 25: 9.Non Ideal Flow

Characteristics of the RTD:

• E(t) is called the exit age distribution function

or RTD function

• describes the amount of time molecules have

spent in the reactor

25

Page 26: 9.Non Ideal Flow

Cumulative age distribution function F(t):

t

dttEtF0

)()(

t

dttEtF )()(1

26

Page 27: 9.Non Ideal Flow

Relationship between the E and F curves

27

Page 28: 9.Non Ideal Flow

28

Cumulative age distribution function F(t):

Washout function W(t) = 1 - F(t): 28

Page 29: 9.Non Ideal Flow

29

Page 30: 9.Non Ideal Flow

E and F Curves with bypassing

30

Page 31: 9.Non Ideal Flow

E and F Curves with Dead space

31

Page 32: 9.Non Ideal Flow

E and F Curves with Channeling

32

Page 33: 9.Non Ideal Flow

33

Page 34: 9.Non Ideal Flow

34

Page 35: 9.Non Ideal Flow

0

32/3

3 )()(1

dttEttS m

What is the significance of these moments ??

Moments of RTD:

35

Page 36: 9.Non Ideal Flow

If the distribution curve is only known at a number of discrete time values, ti, then the mean residence time is given by:

This is what you use in the laboratory

36

Page 37: 9.Non Ideal Flow

Variance:

• represents the square of the distribution spread and has the units of (time)2

• the greater the value of this moment, the greater the spread of the RTD

• useful for matching experimental curves to one family of theoretical curvesSkewness:

• the magnitude of this moment measures the extent that the distribution is skewed in one direction or other in reference to the mean 37

Page 38: 9.Non Ideal Flow

Space time vs. Mean residence time:

0

)( dtttEtm0v

V

The Space time and Mean residence time would be

equal if the following two conditions are satisfied:

• No density change

• No backmixing

In practical reactors the above two may not be valid

and hence there will be a difference between them.38

Page 39: 9.Non Ideal Flow

Normalized RTD function E():

)()( tEE /t

0

)(1 dttE

0

)(1 dE

What is the significance of E() ??

How does E() vs. looks like for two ideal CSTRs of different sizes ??

How does E(t) vs. t looks like for two ideal CSTRs of different sizes ??

39

Page 40: 9.Non Ideal Flow

Using the normalized RTD function, it is possible to compare the flow performance inside different reactors.

If E() is used, all perfectly mixed CSTRs have numerically the same RTD.

If E(t) is used, its numerical values can change for different CSTRs based on their sizes.

40

Page 41: 9.Non Ideal Flow

RTD in ideal reactors:

41

Page 42: 9.Non Ideal Flow

RTD for ideal PFR:

)()( ttE

00)( twhent0)( twhent

1)( dtt

)()()( gdtttg

0

)()( dtttdtttEtm

0

222 0)()()()( dttttdttEtt mm 42

Page 43: 9.Non Ideal Flow

RTD for ideal CSTR:

0

/ /)( dttedtttEt tm

0

/2

22 )()()(

dte

tdttEtt t

m

Material balance on tracer st to pulse input:

in – out = accumulation

0 – vC = VdC/dt C(t) = C0 e-t/

/

0

/0

/0

0

)(

)()(

t

t

t e

dteC

eC

dttC

tCtE

eE )(

43

Page 44: 9.Non Ideal Flow

44

Page 45: 9.Non Ideal Flow

45

Page 46: 9.Non Ideal Flow

RTD for PFR-CSTR series:

For a pulse tracer input into CSTR the output

would be : C(t) = C0e-t/s

Then the outlet would be delayed by a time p at the

outlet of the PFR. RTD for the system would be:

pttE 0)(

ps

t

te

tEsP

/)(

)(p

1/s

46

Page 47: 9.Non Ideal Flow

If the pulse of tracer is introduced into the PFR,

then the same pulse will appear at the entrance of

the CSTR p seconds later. So the RTD for PFR-CSTR

also would be similar to CSTR-PFR.

Though RTD is same for both, performance is

different

47

Page 48: 9.Non Ideal Flow

Remarks:

• RTD is unique for a particular reactor

• The reactor system need not be unique for a

given RTD

• RTD alone may not be sufficient to analyze the

performance of non-ideal reactors

• Along with RTD, a model for the flow behaviour

is required

48

Page 49: 9.Non Ideal Flow

Reactor modeling with RTD:

I. Zero parameter models:

(a)Segregation model

(b)Maximum mixedness model

II. One parameter models:

(a)Tanks-in-series model

(b)Dispersion model

III. Two parameter models:

Micro-mixing models

Macro-mixing models

49

Page 50: 9.Non Ideal Flow

50

Page 51: 9.Non Ideal Flow

Segregation model (Dankwerts & Zwietering, 1958)

Characteristics:

•Flow is visualized in the form of globules

•Each globule consists of molecules belonging to the same residence time

•Different globules have different Res. Times

•No interaction/mixing between different globules

51

Page 52: 9.Non Ideal Flow

52

Page 53: 9.Non Ideal Flow

53

Page 54: 9.Non Ideal Flow

Mean conversion of globules spending between t and t+dt in the reactor =

(Conversion achieved after spending a time t in the reactor) X

(Fraction of globules that spend between t and t+dt in the reactor)

dttEtxxd )()(_

0

_

)()( dttEtxx

54

Page 55: 9.Non Ideal Flow

Mean conversion in a PFR using Segregation model:

Example: A R, I order, Constant density

OrderIforetx kt1)(

00

_

)(1)()1( dttEedttEex ktkt

kkt edttex

1)(10

_

Mean conversion predicted by Segregation model

matches with ideal PFR

55

Page 56: 9.Non Ideal Flow

Mean conversion in a CSTR using Segregation model:

Example: A R, I order, Constant density

0

/

0

_

/)(1 dteedttEex tktkt

k

kx

1

_

Mean conversion predicted by Segregation model

matches with ideal CSTR

56

Page 57: 9.Non Ideal Flow

Mean conversion in a practical reactor using

Segregation model:Example: A R, I order, Constant density

00

_

)(1)()( dttEedttEtxx kt

• conduct tracer experiment on the practical reactor

• measure C(t) and evaluate E(t)

• plot and evaluate mean conversion

57

Page 58: 9.Non Ideal Flow

Tanks in series (TIS) Model:

Material balance on the I reactor for tracer:

V1 dC1/dt = -v C1 C1 = C0 exp(-t/1)

Material balance on the II reactor for tracer:

V2 dC2/dt = v C1 – v C2 dC2/dt + C2/2 = C0exp(-t/2) 258

Page 59: 9.Non Ideal Flow

2/

2

02

te

tCC it

i

etC

CSimilarly

/

2

20

3 2

it

i

et

dttC

tCtE

/

3

2

0

3

33 2

)(

)()(

For n equal sized CSTRs:

itni

n

en

ttE

/

1

)1()(

59

Page 60: 9.Non Ideal Flow

Total = ni = t/ n = t/i

nn

tni

n

i en

nne

n

tnTEE i

)1(

)(

)1()()(

1/

1

As the number becomes large, the behavior of the system approaches that of PFR

60

Page 61: 9.Non Ideal Flow

61

Page 62: 9.Non Ideal Flow

0

22

22 )()1(

dE

We can calculate the dimensionless variance 2

000

2 )()(2)( dEdEdE

1)1(

12)1(

)(

0

1

0

12

den

nde

n

nn nnn

nn

nnn

nn

n

n

nn

n 11)1(

11

)1(

)1( 22

The number of tanks n = 1/2 = 2/2

If the reaction is I order: nik

x)1(

11

62

Page 63: 9.Non Ideal Flow

The Dispersion Model:

• The Dispersion Model is used to describe non-ideal PFR

• Axial dispersion is taken into consideration

• Analogous to Fick’s law of diffusion superimposed on the

flow

Da = Diffusivity coefficient; U = superficial velocity;

L = Characteristic length 63

Page 64: 9.Non Ideal Flow

Ideal Plug flow

Backmixing or dispersion, is used to represent the combined action of all phenomena, namely molecular diffusion, turbulent mixing, and non-uniform velocities, which give rise to a distribution of residence times in the reactor.

If the reactor is an ideal plug flow, the tracer pulse traverses through the reactor without distortion and emerges to give the characteristic ideal plug flow response. If diffusion occurs, the tracer spreads away from the center of the original pulse in both the upstream and downstream directions.

64

Page 65: 9.Non Ideal Flow

Closed vessel Dispersion Model:

Da = Damkohler number = k C0n-1

)1(2222

2rPe

rrm

ePePet

2/22/2

2/

)1()1(

41

qPeqPe

Pe

eqeq

qex

PeDq a /41

65

Page 66: 9.Non Ideal Flow

66

Page 67: 9.Non Ideal Flow

67

Page 68: 9.Non Ideal Flow

68

Page 69: 9.Non Ideal Flow

The x-axis, labeled ‘‘macromixing’’ measures the breadth of the residence time distribution. It is zero for piston flow, fairly broad for the exponential distribution of a stirred tank, and broader yet for situations involving bypassing or stagnancy.

The y-axis is micromixing, which varies from none to complete. Micromixing effects are unimportant for piston flow and have maximum importance for stirred tank reactors.

Well-designed reactors will usually fall in the normal region bounded by the three apexes, which correspond to piston flow, a perfectly mixed CSTR, and a completely segregated CSTR.

69

Page 70: 9.Non Ideal Flow

Without even measuring the RTD, limits on the performance of most real reactors can be determined by calculating the performance at the three apexes of the normal region.

The calculations require knowledge only of the rate constants and the mean residence time.

When the residence time distribution is known, the uncertainty about reactor performance is greatly reduced.

A real system must lie somewhere along a vertical line in Normal Region.

The upper point on this line corresponds to maximum mixedness and usually provides one bound limit on reactor performance.

Whether it is an upper or lower bound depends on the reaction mechanism.

The lower point on the line corresponds to complete segregation and provides the opposite bound on reactor performance.

70

Page 71: 9.Non Ideal Flow

ANY CLARIFICATIONS ?

Kuhn, Thomas. . . no theory ever solves all the puzzles with which it is confronted at

agiven time; nor are the solutions already achieved often perfect.

71