Upload
christopher-magnus-cameron
View
222
Download
3
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
9th Annual Ronald C. Baird Sea Grant Science Symposium
Environmental Contaminants in Shell Diseased vs. Non-Diseased American
Lobsters (Homarus americanus)
Lawrence A. LeBlanc, Deanna L. Prince and Hans Laufer
School of Marine Sciences,Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition
University of Maine, Orono, MEDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Connecticut,
Storrs, CT
Is contaminant exposure correlated to the presence of lobster shell disease?
Metals & Organics have a variety of toxic effects:– neurotoxicity, endocrine disruption, narcotic
toxicity
– Little is known of the interaction effects of metal and organic contaminants
– A combination of stressors may lead to compromised immune systems
Why Shell Disease and Contaminants?
• Shell disease in crustaceans more prevalent in impacted environments– Lobster- Massachusetts Bay,
Buzzards Bay (Estrella, 1984)
• Evidence of elevated concentrations of trace metals with shell disease – Blue Crabs (Weinstein, et al.
1992)– Lobster (Vassiliev, 2004)
• Alkylphenols are postulated to have a role in shell disease (Laufer et al.)
Two Approaches
• LeBlanc and Prince:– Compare patterns of trace metal and organic
contaminant accumulation in shell-diseased and non-diseased lobsters
• Laufer et al.– Investigations of the effects of alkylphenol
compounds on shell thinning
Our Hypothesis:
• There is a relationship between epizootic shell disease and contaminant body burdens
Project Objectives• Determine whether there is a relationship between
contaminant concentrations in hepatopancreas/hemolymph and lobster shell disease
• Evaluate the use of lobster hemolymph as a rapid screening tool for contaminant exposure
• Develop a multiresidue method for a wide suite of organic contaminants suitable for lobster hepatopancreas and hemolymph tissues”
• Examine the partitioning of metals between various component tissues (including gills, ovaries, muscle, exoskeleton)
Project Objectives
• Why Hepatopancreas?– Concentrations of many trace
elements are higher than in muscle tissue
– Elevated concentrations of lipophilic organic contaminants
• Why Hemolymph?– Easier matrix to work with
Less labor-intensive sample preparation
Lobster Collection• Lobster collections:
– Regional: RI, LIS, ME– Lobster 100: RI
• Shell-diseased and healthy lobsters from the same sites
• Healthy lobsters from a reference site (ME) – lobster 100 study
• Approximately 185 samples analyzed– Hepatopancreas,
hemolymph, other tissues
What We Measured:
• Twenty five different trace elements, including:– Contaminant metals
Arsenic, cadmium, copper, chromium, nickel, lead, mercury
– Nutritive trace elementsCalcium, potassium, magnesium
– Other elementsAluminum, iron, manganese
What We Measured:
• Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)– Selected congeners – 19
congeners
• Legacy organochlorine compounds– DDTs, aldrin, dieldrin,
endosulfan
• Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs)
• Selected alkylphenols and bisphenol A See Poster
What We Have Learned:Contaminant Metals
• Regional Collections: RI, LIS, ME• Concentrations are generally similar between
diseased and non-diseased lobsters– Outliers occurred in all groups – Hepatopancreas and hemolymph
No Difference Between Diseased & Non-Diseased(RI Hepatopancreas)
Copper
SD NSD
Con
cent
ratio
n (
g/g
dry
wt.)
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
Cadmium
SD NSD
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Chromium
SD NSD
0
5
10
15
20
25Nickel
SD NSD
0
10
20
30
40
What We Have Learned:Lobster 100
• Two metals: Cr, Hg– Diseased > Non- Diseased and Reference– Two-ten fold higher in diseased
Lobster 100 Metal Concentrations Similar to Other Impacted Sites
Cd(g/g)
Cr(g/g)
Cu(g/g)
Ni(g/g)
Pb(g/g)
SD(31)
2.8 - 100(4.3)
0.08 – 35(4.23)
200 – 4,300(182)
0.32 – 31(1.28)
0.04 – 3.3(0.24)
NSD(30)
2.6 – 23(4.23)
0.08 – 1.2(0.41)
300 – 3,700(150)
0.27 – 5.1(0.96)
0.04 – 0.72(0.27)
Ref(19)
0.40 – 75(6.23)
0.05 – 1.3(0.28)
15 – 800(24)
0.79 – 3.6(1.39)
0.02 – 0.11(0.13)
Other Studies
Boston Harbor
1.2 – 6.6 0.1 – 2.5 37 - 640 0.51 – 0.85
LIS 5.4 – 50.8 0 – 0.75 180 – 3,880 0.90 – 5.97 1.2 – 15
Outfall (GOC)
11.5 + 7.5 0.9 + 0.5 380 + 500 4.4 + 0.7 350 + 77
Maine 1.8 - 59.8 0.07 - 1.3 12 - 500 0.07 - 2.4 0.02 - 0.46
What We Have Learned:Lobster 100
• Lobster sex (M/F) did not appear to be a significant factor in contaminant metal concentrations
• Sediments from the lobster 100 site had metal concentrations approaching levels of concern
As Cd Cr Cu Ni Pb
g/g) g/) g/g) g/) g/g) g/g)
Mean (n = 5) 15.3 0.2 104 31 420 106Std. dev. 1.3 0.1 2.2 2.8 25 82ERL1 8.2 1.2 81 34 30 47ERM2 70 9.6 370 270 50 2181ERL = effects range low = the l10th percentile of the concentration range where biological effects were observed in standardized sediment exposures2ERM = effects range median = the 50th percentile concentration range where biological effects were observed.
Sediment metals from the lobster 100 site approach and exceed levels of concern
What We Have Learned:Metals Partitioning
Hepatopancreas: As, Cd, Cu, Fe
Muscle:
Gills: Cr
Shell: Mn, Ni, Pb
Ovary:
Hemolymph:
Hepatopancreas metal concentrations sometimes exceed FDA action levels
Metals Action Level1 (ppm)
Hepatopancreas Concentration (ppm)
Muscle Concentration (ppm)
Arsenic 76 13 (0.75 - 170) 10 (6.9 – 14)
Cadmium 3 5.8 (0.08 -51) 0.91 (0 – 8.8)
Chromium 12 0.32 (0.03 – 17) 0.01 (0.01 – 0.02)
Lead 1.5 0.05 ( 0.01 – 0.11) 0.06 (0.01 – 0.57)
Mercury 1.0(methyl)
0.17 (0.04 – 0.49)(total)
0.07 (0.001 – 0.16)(total)
Nickel 70 1 0.82 (0.08 – 15) 1.0 (0.02 – 9.8)1 FDA Action Levels for Crustacea
Organic Contaminants
• Developed multi-residue method– Employed various separation and cleanup
technologies
• Hepatopancreas – Very lipid rich– Difficult to adequately clean up extract – Preliminary Data [See Poster]
Hexane: Acetonitrile
AluminaColumn
Gel Permeation Chromatography
Silica gelColumn
PCBs/OCs OCsAlkylphenolics
C-18 Column
PSA (primarySecondary amine)Column
Bisphenol ASteroidal Estrogens
Multi-residue Method
See Poster
Take Home Messages
• No strong relationship between metal body burden & disease state– Regionally, no differences b/w SD & NSD– Lobster 100 (RI), 2 metals SD> NSD>Ref
• Metal concentrations in hepatopancreas are similar to those of other impacted sites
• Metals in hepatopancreas (tomalley) sometimes exceed FDA action limits