Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
BY THEO TEKSTRA – MARKETING MANAGER GAVITA HOLLAND BV
“LEDs are the future”... How often have you heard that in the past few
years? So, is the future already now, or are we getting there? Is LED the
new “wonder light,” or do we still have to learn to appreciate LED? An
overview of the history of LED and the current status.
76
A BRIGHT FUTURE?
LED LIGHTING I GARDEN CULTURE
77 GARDENCULTUREMAGAZINE.COM
Not all energy is converted to light, and not all light escapes
the semiconductor, and there is a lot of heat development
as well. However, in contrast to HPS lighting, this is not
infrared radiated heat, but conducted heat. So LEDs do
create heat, just not as radiant heat, but conductive heat.
This is why LEDs need to be thoroughly cooled, and this is
also the Achilles heel of many LED fixtures. Temperature
is the enemy of a long LED life and light maintenance,
hence the need for a large thermal heat sink. So the light
of LEDs contains very little heat, in contrast with high
pressure sodium, which contains about 55-58% infrared
radiation. Is that a lot? Not when you realize that the sun
emits 53% infrared radiation. There we already have one
big difference between HPS and LED.
White LEDsNow each specific semiconductor will give you a specific
color of light, but there is no semiconductor that emits
white light. How do they do that? Very simple: think
compact fluorescent (CFL). When they developed a blue
LED in the 90’s, they suddenly also had the technology
to make a white LED, by adding a phosphorous layer
on the blue LED. So basically a white LED works the
same as a CFL: The blue light excites the phosphor,
and depending on the blend of that phosphor, a specific
color (band) will be emitted. The phosphorous layer is
usually semi-transparent, so some blue light will also still
come through. By changing the phosphor coating you can
change the spectrum.
However, phosphor coatings do have a conversion
efficiency, and they do reflect some light back to the
emitter as well. The best coatings nowadays are 85%
efficient at optimal temperatures, so there is a loss of light
too. Moreover, a phosphor coating close to the emitter
will heat up, decreasing its efficiency. That’s why white
LEDs are less efficient than their blue counterparts. The
phosphor coating is more diffuse than the original blue
LED. Lens systems are required to get the light where
you need it.
HistoryDid you know that the first LEDs were commercially on
the market long before the first HPS lamp? It was 1962
when the first (infra)red LED hit the market, and the
first HPS lamp came out around 1968. The LED found
its way into computers, watches, calculators, and other
appliances that needed a long life, low power indicator or
display light. First, there were the red LEDs, and later new
technologies enabled other colors too. The first green
and yellow LEDs came out in 1971, but it took until 1993
until the brilliant blue and white LEDs hit the market.
Back then we never thought that LED technology would
replace the incandescent lamp, or even the highly efficient
sodium lights. That is a development of the last 10 years.
LED has evolved into what we call a “disruptive
technology”: it displaces established technology, such
as incandescent and CFL, and shakes up the industry. In
1993, we had the first white LEDS, but it took until 2006
for LED technology to hit the 100 lumens per Watt mark.
Today, there is LED technology that goes even beyond
that, though it becomes harder to raise the bar, and it
does come at a cost.
TechnologyWithout diving too heavily into the actual technology,
LED light is based on what we call Electroluminescence.
In laymen’s terms: When applying electrical power to
a crystal (a semiconductor), it starts emitting light.
Contrary to what you would expect, light does not exit
the semiconductor in all ways, but in certain directions
due to its structure. By shaping the semiconductor in a
specific way you can focus the light. The LED is usually
embedded in a clear molded plastic, that acts not only as
a housing to hold the fragile electronics, but also as a lens
to diffuse the light from the emitter.
Cross-section of Philips LED, Luxeon K2
THE FIRST LEDS WERE COMMERCIALLY ON THE MARKET LONG BEFORE THE FIRST HPS LAMP
78
At this moment the best single color LEDs can do up to
2.7 μmol s-1 per Watt under ideal circumstances, for white
LEDs this is about 2.4 with remote-phosphor technology.
These are the top of the line LEDs with a very high efficiency,
but they also come at a cost.
In 2000 at a conference, Dr. Roland Haitz presented a
forecast about LED price and output development, now
known as Haitz’s law. It defines light per package, so not
necessarily the efficiency. As you can imagine, there is a
theoretical maximum in the amount of light you can convert
from energy. What is interesting though is the prognosis of
the price compared to the light output.
The law is about as follows: Every decade the cost per lumen
drops a factor 10, while the output per LED package (single
unit) increases by a factor 20. So you will get bigger LEDs
with higher output, against a much lower price. What does
this mean for our purpose?
First of all, the efficiency of LEDs does NOT increase a
factor 20. It is not even said that the higher output LEDs will
be much more efficient - at first, they will just have a higher
output. What is interesting though is that prices will drop.
We have seen this in the past ten years, and we still see a
drop in price.
Remote-Phosphor LEDsRelatively new on the market are the remote-phosphor
LEDs. They are more efficient than the integrated white
LEDs, with up to more than 20% better conversion rate
than the standard white LED. How does that work?
Phosphor conversion process in a white LED and remote phosphor
system – Source: CREE
A normal white LED has the phosphor coating very close to
the emitter. There will be conversion losses and reflection
losses as you see in the illustration, but the biggest problem
is the temperature of the LED, and therefore, the phosphor
layer itself. Some of the blue light will pass, some will be
converted, but the conversion rate is negatively affected by
the temperature of the phosphor.
In a remote-phosphor application, we use blue LEDs and a
phosphor coated (glass) disk at a distance from the LEDs, in
a reflector. While the efficiency of this system is a lot better,
it will only produce diffuse light, because, due to the size of
the phosphor disk, and the diffuse output of the light, it is
very hard to concentrate this light. Also the costs can be
much higher than single white LEDs, because the costs of
making the fixture with the disk is higher, not to mention
IP ratings you want to achieve. So, for close diffuse lighting
this is a great technology, but not so much for focused high
intensity top lights.
Output Power / Light Output / EfficiencyThe theoretical efficiency of an LED could even be over 4 μmol
s-1 per Watt when all of the energy could be converted, It
would require far future technology to even get close to
this, so don’t count on that coming for years. We will see
though that efficiency will get a bit better still, and that the
prices are going to drop.
TEMPERATURE IS THE ENEMY OF A LONG LED LIFE AND LIGHT MAINTENANCE
LED LIGHTING I GARDEN CULTURE
COB LEDs
Cree high output white COB
You might have heard about COB LEDs. COB stands for Chip
on Board, and it is a way of producing cheaper high output
LEDs by pre-mounting many of them on a board. While the
high output single LEDs range up to several watts, you can
make COBs in much higher wattages, combining multiple
LEDs. A phosphor coated COB will have less glare than the
single point LEDs, but the light density is also a bit lower than
the single LEDs. A lens system is needed to direct the light,
leading to extra losses.
COBs are developed to reduce costs and increase output,
and they are not necessarily the best solution for all lighting
needs. They might be too concentrated in some applications,
or not concentrated enough for deep penetration.
COBs will decrease the price of LED fixtures, but it remains
to be seen how they can be best applied.
Light MaintenanceHPS light maintenance is specified as percentage of light
maintained over a period. For the Philips GreenPower plus
1000W EL this is as follows:
4,000h 98%
8,000h 96%
10,000h 95%
LEDs are specified differently. For household LEDs we use the
specification L70 as an industry standard: It is found out that
70% lumens maintenance is close to the threshold at which a
human eye can detect a reduction in light output. So, the L70
specification gives you the number of hours of operation until
there is a degradation in light of 30%. For plants, however,
light maintenance is crucial. You should always look at a L90
for LEDs that are used in Horticulture. This is already 10%
79
less light, a value you would not reach with HPS lamps
(they would already be replaced). The light maintenance
is greatly influenced by the junction temperature, which is
the temperature of the base of the LED. High temperatures
decrease this dramatically:
Source: Philips technology white paper
So, environment and cooling of the LEDs plays an important
role in getting optimal light levels and optimal light
maintenance. A L90 of 25,000 hours could well be much
lower.
GARDENCULTUREMAGAZINE.COM
LEDS ARE AN EXCITING NEW LIGHTING TECHNOLOGY
A MICROMOLE OF LED LIGHT IS STILL 6-10 TIMES MORE EXPENSIVE THAN HPS
81 GARDENCULTUREMAGAZINE.COM
What is the verdict?LEDs are an exciting new lighting technology. They are
efficient, available in almost every spectrum you desire, and
they have a long life. You can use them in applications where
HID lamps could never be used, for example:
• Interlighting (lighting between high crops in
greenhouses)
• Multi-layer growing (food factories where distance to
the crop is low)
• Specific supplemental light (for example to supplement
HPS)
Above: Tomato LED trials at GreenQ –
innovation center in The Netherlands
LED LIGHTING I GARDEN CULTURE
HPS is not an alternative for any of those applications.
However, there are some disadvantages as well. LEDs are
on full trial in many greenhouses, because growers want to
experience what is needed to grow under LED successfully.
However, replacing HPS top lighting with LED has a few
problems that need to be overcome:
1. Uniformity. As you want to intercept as little light as
possible you must make light strips that fit under existing or
new profiles.
2. Climate conditions. LEDs perform best and live
longest when they are not driven to their highest wattage,
and are kept cool. Temperatures at the top of a greenhouse
can be very high.
3. Little infrared heat. Even in a desert, the nights are
cold. In the winter seasons, when the assimilation lighting is
used most often, the infrared radiation of the HPS light is
a very efficient way to heat your crop. With LEDs you will
need to heat your greenhouse as all the heat dissipates at
the back of the LED. Also, the lower infrared radiation leads
to less evaporation of water, so you need to up the EC of
your nutrients by more than 25% in many cases.
4. Price. A micromole of LED light is still 6-10 times more
expensive than traditional HPS lighting. This is the biggest
problem, as you have to invest heavily, and will need to keep
that installation for at least 5-7 years. In that time we expect
LED to become at least 20-40% more efficient, so when
are you going to invest? When there is a more efficient HPS
lamp available, it is just a matter of changing a lamp, but you
can’t with LED.
For indoor uses, many of these issues are the same. As
it is your primary lighting indoors, the investment is very
high. No infrared means that you will need to find a way to
keep your crop at the optimal temperature, while 1000W
of LED create the same heat gain as 1000W HPS. So in a
recirculating room there is hardly any advantage in cooling.
We will need to learn how to grow under LED. Prices
still need to drop to make them a viable alternative for
HPS. But the future is nearing, and it is a good idea to get
some experience with growing under LED, as you will be
confronted with different growing challenges. 3