Upload
vodung
View
218
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Med. J. Cairo Univ., Vol. 79, No. 2, March: 115-127, 2011
www.medicaljournalofcairouniversity.com
A Case Control Study of Epileptic School Children,
Assiut Governorate, Upper Egypt
ETEMAD A.A. EL-SHEREEF, M.D.*; TAGHREED A. MOHAMED, M.D.*; MOHAMED A. ABDALLAH, M.D.*; MOHAMED A. EL-TORKEY, M.D.** and EMAD EL-DEEN M. HAMMAD, M.D.***
The Departments of Public Health & Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut* and South Valley** Universities and
Neuropediatric Unit, Pediatric University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University***
Abstract Objective: To study the socio-demographic characteristics
of epileptic school children and the risk factors for epilepsy in the study area.
Study Design: Case-Control study.
Setting: Two primary and one preparatory school children,
Assiut Governorate, Upper Egypt.
Subjects: The target population were basic education (primary and preparatory schools) epileptic school children. Matched controls for epileptic children were taken from the
same schools.
Methodology: Structured questionnaire of epileptic chil-dren and their controls included sociodemographic character-istics as age, sex, educational class and questions about the risk factors hypothesized from reviewing the literature and
previous studies such as many perinatal, infantile and childhood illnesses and exposures. Other family factors were included such as history of consanguinity and family history of epilepsy.
The questionnaire was completed through personal interview
with the caregivers of school children either cases or controls.
The part of the questionnaire including questions about the perinatal factors was completed from the mothers of the
children.
Results: The sample included 200 cases and controls each.
53.6% of epileptic cases were females. Rural residents repre-sented 56.0% of cases and controls of the significant risk
factors for developing epilepsy were: Family history of
epilepsy, Low socioeconomic level, birth trauma, head trauma,
history of febrile convulsions, neonatal jaundice, premature rupture of membranes and prematurity.
Conclusion: Raising the socioeconomic level of epileptic persons by finding opportunities for them to education and
employment to break the link between epilepsy and poverty
was recommended. Training of the general practioners, obste-tricians, and pediatricians about proper antenatal, natal and
postnatal care and management to avoid intrauterine infections,
birth trauma and neonatal problems is crucial.
Key Words: Epilepsy – Risk factors – School children.
Correspondence to: Dr. Etemad A.A. El-Shereef, The Department of Public Health & Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University.
Introduction
EPILEPSY is the most common serious neurolog-ical disorder and is one of the world's most preva-lent non-communicable diseases. It is estimated that the condition affects approximately 50 million
people, around 40 million of them live in develop-ing countries [1] . In Egypt, about 840,000 people have epilepsy. This means that about one million
Egyptian families directly suffer from the various consequences of the condition – physically, socially
and economically [2] .
Many epileptic school children are not known to the education authorities [3] and teachers feel that they have inadequate general knowledge of
epilepsy and had not learnt the specific classroom management of epileptic children or the problems
of pupils with epilepsy [4,5] .
Although antiepileptic drugs are widely avail-able, many patients with active epilepsy are un-treated and the treatment gap is much greater in
developing countries [6] . Moreover, the lack of AED knowledge results in decreased patients com-pliance, which is a serious hindrance to successful treatment and can place the patient at unnecessary
risk [7] .
An increasing awareness of the value of epide-miological studies of epilepsy has been manifested over the past several decades. Epidemiological
studies generate important data about the disease
that cannot be obtained by clinical interviews [8] .
Epidemiological studies of childhood epilepsy are of important to compare incidence and preva-lence rates, age distribution, inheritance, seizure types, epilepsy syndromes and treatment strategies
[9] . In Egypt we still have only very few limited
115
116 A Case Control Study of Epileptic School Children
data available concerning incidence, prevalence
and demographic characteristics of epileptics [10] .
El-Baz and El-Baz, [11] in their study in Egypt concluded that epilepsy is an existing problem that has many dark areas in its epidemiology and treat-ment compliance, waiting to be further enlightened by further research.
The objectives of the present study was to study the socio-demographic characteristics of epileptic
school children and the risk factors for epilepsy in the study area.
Subjects and Methods
Study design: Case-control study: Comparing epileptic chil-
dren with their matched control for the presence
of risk factors for epilepsy.
Study population: • Basic education school children (primary and
preparatory school children) of both sexes who
are known to have epilepsy and/or receiving antiepileptic drugs and belonging to the study
area in Assiut Governorate. Those children were identified through school records and health
insurance records.
• Control groups for epileptic children were chosen from the same schools compared with epileptic children regarding risk factors for developing epilepsy.
Sampling technique: • A stratification of all the districts in Assiut Gov-
ernorate was done according to their geographical distribution to the east or the west side of the River Nile.
• For convenience, one district from the eastern
group (Al-Fateh District) and two districts from
the western group (Assiut District and Abu-Teeg
District) were selected to represent the governor-ate. Both urban and rural areas were selected
from each district.
• Schools within the chosen districts were stratified
to primary and preparatory schools. The prepara-tory schools were further stratified to male and
female schools.
• Selection of schools within each stratum was
guided by the number of the reported epileptic
cases in the school records, health insurance records and also the personal communication with the educational authorities and the adminis-trators of schools to verify the eligible number
of children within each school. This was done to obtain the highest yield from each school visit.
Sample size: The sample size for cases and controls was
calculated using the EPI info 2000 statistical pack-age. The calculation was done using the expected
frequencies of the different risk factors among
cases and control and/or the calculated odds ratio
from previous studies using 95% confidence inter-val and 80% power of the test, and taking one
control for each case, the largest sample size cal-culated according to the above criteria was 135 cases and control each. The present study included 200 cases and 200 matched controls.
Technical design: I- Preparatory stage:
- Review of literature about epilepsy was carried out through multiple searches in libraries, Medline databases and internet network.
- Preliminary visit and communication with the educational, health insurance and school health authorities were carried out to know about meth-ods of disease reporting and the availability of
the relevant information to trace those children.
- The official approvals of the directors of both
education and health insurance sectors of Assiut
Governorate were obtained.
- Revision of health insurance records and school
records to obtain data about the number, names
and schools of epileptic children.
- Construction of the relevant questionnaires to be
the tools for data collection was carried out:
a- Questionnaire of epileptic children and their controls included sociodemographic characteristics as age, sex, educational class and questions about
the risk factors hypothesized from reviewing the
literature and previous studies such as many peri-natal, infantile and childhood illnesses and expo-sures. Other family factors were included such as
history of consanguinity and family history of epilepsy. Also the questionnaire included questions
about the socioeconomic level of the family ac-cording to family socio-economic status scale prepared by Abdel-Tawab, [12] . The questionnaire was completed through personal interview with
the caregivers of school children either cases or
controls. The part of the questionnaire including questions about the perinatal factors was completed from the mothers of the children.
b- Pilot study was carried out on 20 epileptic cases attending Sedi Galal health insurance clinic
Etemad A.A. El-Shereef, et al. 117
and their caregivers from both rural and urban
school to test the questionnaires, and to identify difficulties that may arise and deal with them accordingly. This step resulted in rephrasing of some question, omitting and adding others and
assessment of the time needed for interview. This step was carried out during October 2004. Cases
of the pilot study were not included in the results
of the thesis.
II- Field work:
The fieldwork of the present study was carried out from November, 2004 to may, 2005. Obtaining the school grade of the cases and controls was carried out later on in the eligible time according
to the school class the child belonged the following
steps were carried out:
III- Statistical analysis:
• Revision of data and coding variables in the three
forms of questionnaire was done to be ready for computer entry.
• Data entry, cleaning and management took place. Statistical analysis and tabulation were done using
Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS for windows, version 9). The SPSS was used in
calculating the socioeconomic score for each case
and control according to the weight of each in-volved variable.
The following statistical tests were used:
• Descriptive statistics: Frequencies, percentages,
means and standard deviations.
• Tests of significance: Chi square test and Student
t-test.
• Odds ratio: Was calculated as a measure of asso-ciation between the different risk factors and
epilepsy at 95% confidence limit. The calculation took place by using the EPI info 2000.
• Logistic regression analysis: Was applied to rank the different risk factors according to their role
in the development of epilepsy.
• Statistically significant differences were consid-ered when p-value was at least less than 0.05%.
Ethical considerations:
• Verbal consents were obtained from all the par-ticipants; school personnel and caregivers of the
epileptic children.
• Privacy and confidentiality of all the information
obtained was observed.
Results
53.5% of epileptic cases and their controls were
males and 46.5% were females. Rural residents represented 56.0% of cases and control while urban residents represented 44.0%. Primary school stu-dents represented 68% of cases and control versus
32.0% for preparatory school students. The mean
age of the cases and control was 11.34 ±2.67 and 11.17±2.55 years respectively without statistical significant difference. There was statistical signif-icant difference between cases and controls as
regard handedness as 12.5% cases were left handed
versus 3.0% of the controls and 1.0% of cases
could use both hands versus none of the controls.
Only 13.5% of epileptic cases were of the high socioeconomic level versus 29.0% of the controls (Table 1).
Table (2) shows that 14.5% of cases had abnor-mal intrauterine position versus 3.5% of the control
with statistical high significant difference and odds ratio (OR) equals 4.7. Mothers of 12.5% of cases
had history of premature rupture of membranes versus 4.0% of controls with statistical high sig-nificant difference (OR = 3.4). On the other hand,
many other antenatal risk factors such as birth
order of the student, history of bleeding during
early or late pregnancy, and maternal age at time
of labor showed no statistically significant differ-ence between cases and controls.
Table (3) shows that some mothers' medical problems during pregnancy such as pre-eclampsia
or eclampsia, hypertention and drug intake during
pregnancy occurred more frequently among cases
than controls with odds ratio equals 2.0, 3.0 and 1.8 respectively but this difference was statistically
insignificant.
In addition, mothers' histories of renal diseases, heart disease, diabetes mellitus and exposure to
radiation during pregnancy showed no statistical
significant difference between cases and controls.
Table (3) also shows that although mothers' past history of miscarriage (abortion and stillbirth)
showed higher occurrence among cases than con-trols, the difference didn't reach the level of statis-tical significance.
Table (4) shows that there was statistically high significant difference between cases and controls as regard prematurity as 7.5% of cases were born
prematurely versus 0.5% of the controls (OR = 16.3) while postmaturity represented 1.5% of cases
versus 0.5% of the controls without statistically
significant difference (p>0.05).
118 A Case Control Study of Epileptic School Children
As regards birth attendants, a doctor or a nurse
delivered more cases than controls (41.0% & 14.5% versus 33.0% & 6.0% respectively) while dayas were responsible for delivery of more controls than
cases (48.0% versus 32.0% respectively) with
statistical high significant difference (p=00.3).
As regards type of labor, 2.5% of cases had
been delivered by ventose or forceps versus none of the controls while 7.0% of controls were deliv-ered by cesarean section versus 4.0% of cases with
statistically significant difference (p=0.01).
The same Table (4) shows that 17.0% of cases
had a history of birth trauma versus 1.0% only of
the controls (OR = 20.3) and 13.5% of the cases
had a history of cyanosis after birth versus 0.5% of the controls (OR = 31.1) with statistical high significant difference for both factors. Also the
same table shows that 20.5% of cases had a history of delayed crying after birth versus 9.5% of the controls with statistically significant difference
(OR = 2.5). There was no statistically significant difference between cases and controls as regards the place of labor.
Table (5) shows that 10.0% of cases needed
neonatal incubator versus 1.0% of controls with statistically significant difference (OR = 11). Also
3.0% of cases had a history of neonatal convulsion versus none of the controls. History of neonatal
jaundice showed statistically high significant dif-ference between cases and controls (13.5% versus 1.5% respectively) with odds ratio equals 10.3.
Table (6) shows that there, were statistically
significant difference between cases and controls as regards history of encephalitis, meningitis and
pyrexia of unknown origin as they represented 3.0%, 3.5%, 4.5%, of cases versus 0.5%, 0.5%,
1.0% of controls with odds ratio equals 6.2, 7.2
and 4.7 for the three diseases respectively.
Other infectious diseases as chicken pox, mea-sles, tuberculosis, showed no statistically significant difference between cases and controls. The same
Table (6) shows that 6.5% of cases versus 0.5% of the controls had a history of febrile convulsions
(OR = 13.8) with statistically significant difference.
There was no statistical significant difference
between cases and controls as regard history of
cerebral hemorrhage or brain tumors.
Table (6) also shows that history of head trauma
was positive among 16.5% of cases versus 3.5%
of the controls with statistical high significant
difference and odds ratio equals 5.5.
Fig. (1) shows that there was statistically high
significant difference between cases and controls as regard family history of epilepsy (46.0% versus
21.0% respectively) with odds ratio equals 3.2.
Fig. (2) also shows that there was statistical significant difference between cases and controls as regard family history of mental retardation
(13.5% for cases versus 3.5% for controls) with
odds ratio equals 4.3.
Fig. (3) shows that consanguinity between
parents did not show statistical significant differ-ence between cases and controls ( p=0.09426).
Table (7) shows the risk factors for developing
epilepsy according to the level of significance.
These risk factors in a descending order were:
Family history of epilepsy, low socioeconomic level, birth trauma, head trauma, history of febrile
convulsions, neonatal jaundice, rupture of mem-branes and Prematurity.
Table (1): Background characteristics of epileptic school children and their controls, Assiut Governorate, 2005.
Background characteristic Cases
(No.=200) Controls
(No.=200) Statistical test p-value No. % No. %
Sex: Males 107 53.5 107 53.5 – – Females 93 46.5 93 46.5
Residence: Rural 112 56.0 112 56.0 – – Urban 88 44.0 88 44.0
School: Primary 136 68.0 136 68.0 – – Preparatory 64 32.0 64 32.0
Handedness: Right 173 86.5 194 97.0 X2=14.8 0.0001** Left 25 12.5 6 3.0 Both 2 1.0 – –
Age/years: (Mean±SD) 11.34±2.67 11.17±2.55 t=0.64 0.261 *
Socioeconomic level: Low 32 16.0 29 14.5 X2=14.6 0.0007** Middle 141 70.5 113 56.5 High 27 13.5 58 29.0
*p>0.05 Non Significant. **p<0.05 Significant.
Etemad A.A. El-Shereef, et al. 119
Table (2): Antenatal risk factors among epileptic school children and their controls, Assiut Governorate, 2005.
Cases Controls Antenatal risk factor (No.=200) (No.=200) Statistical test p-value Odds ratio
No. % No. %
Intrauterine position of the baby: Normal 171 85.5 193 96.5 X2=14.8 0.000 4.7 Abnormal 29 14.5 7 3.5
Premature rupture of membranes: Yes 25 12.5 8 4.0 X2=9.6 0.002 3.4 No 175 87.5 192 96.0
Birth order: First baby 41 20.5 41 20.5 X2=00.0 N.S 1.0 Second to fourth 109 54.5 109 54.5 Fifth and higher 50 25.0 50 25.0
History of bleeding during first trimester: Yes 9 4.5 4 2.0 X2=1.9 0.1681 2.3 No 191 95.5 196 98.0
History of bleeding during Last trimester: Yes 7 3.5 2 1.0 X2=2.8 0.0943 3.6 No 193 96.5 198 99.0
Mother age at delivery: Less than 20 years 17 8.5 10 5.0 X2=2.0 0.3679 1.2 20-35 years 163 81.5 169 84.5 Above 35 years 20 10.0 21 10.5
Mother age at delivery by years: (Mean ± SD) 26.77±6.04 27.40±5.90 t=1.0 0.2952 –
*p>0.05 Non Significant. **p<0.05 Significant.
Table (3): Mothers' medical and obstetric history among epileptic school children and their controls, Assiut Governorate, 2005.
Variables Cases
(N=200) Controls (N=200) X2
p-value Odds ratio
No. % No. %
Pre-eclampsia or eclampsia:
Yes 4 2.0 2 1.0 0.7 0.4028* 2.0 No 196 98.0 198 99.0
Hypertension: Yes 6 3.0 2 1.0 2.0 0.1573* 3.0 No 194 97 198 99.0
Drug intake during pregnancy: Yes 24 12.0 14 7.0 2.9 0.0886* 1.8 No 176 88.0 186 93.0
Renal diseases: Yes 4 2.0 4 2.0 0.0 1.0 No 196 98.0 196 98.0
Heart diseases: Yes 2 1.0 2.8 0.0943* – No 198 99.0 200 100
Diabetes mellitus: Yes 3 1.5 3.0 0.0833* – No 197 98.5 200 100
Exposure to radiation: Yes 1 0.5 1 0.5 0.0 N.S* 1.0 No 199 99.5 199 99.5
History of abortion: Yes 84 42. 75 37.5 0.85 0.3566* 1.2 No 11.6 58.0 125 62.5
History of still birth: Yes 12 6.0 7 3.5 1.4 0.2367* 1.8 No 188 94.0 193 96.5
*p>0.05 (Non Significant).
120 A Case Control Study of Epileptic School Children
Table (4): Perinatal risk factors among epileptic school children and their controls, Assiut Governorate, 2005.
Perinatal risk factors Cases Controls
X2 p-value Odds ratio
No. % No. %
Time of labor: At time 182 91.0 198 99.0 Before expected 15 7.5 1 0.5 12.9 0.000 16.3 After expected 3 1.5 1 0.5 1.16 0.5599 3.2
Labor attendant: Doctor 82 41.0 66 33.0 Nurse 29 14.5 12 6.0 Daya 64 32.0 96 48.0 Relative/neighbors 24 12.0 24 12.0 15.8 0.003 Alone 1 0.5 2 1.0
Type of labor: Normal 185 92.5 186 93.0 By forceps 2 1.0 0 0.00 11.4 0.01 By ventose 5 2.5 0 0.00 Cesarean section 8 4.0 14 7.0
Birth trauma: Yes 34 17.0 2 1.0 31.3 0.000 20.3 No 166 83.0 198 99.0
Cyanosis after birth: Yes 27 13.5 1 0.5 26.0 0.000 31.1 No 173 86.5 199 99.5
Crying immediately after birth: Yes 159 79.5 181 90.5 9.5 0.002 2.5 No 41 20.5 19 9.5
Place of delivery: At home 123 61.5 136 68.0 3.4 0.1827 – At hospital 69 34.5 61 30.5 Private clinic 8 4.0 3 1.5
Table (5): Neonatal risk factors among epileptic school children and their controls, Assiut Governorate, 2005.
Neonatal risk factor
Cases (No.=200)
Controls (No.=200) Statistical test p-value Odds ratio
No. % No. %
Need for incubator: Yes 20 10.0 2 1.0 X2=15.6 0.000 11.0 No 180 90.0 198 99.0
Neonatal convulsion: Yes 6 3.0 – – X2=6.1 0.01 – No 194 97.0 200 100
Neonatal jaundice: Yes 27 13.5 3 1.5 X2=20.8 0.000 10.3 No 173 86.5 197 98.5
Age at beginning of jaundice by days: Mean ± SD 3.3±2.0 4.0±2.6 t=0.5 N.S
Duration of jaundice by days: Mean ± SD 11.4±8.7 6.7±3.5 t=0.9 N.S
Etemad A.A. El-Shereef, et al. 121
Table (6): History of exposure to some diseases and head trauma among epileptic school children and their controls, Assiut
Governorate, 2005.
Infectious disease
Cases (No.=200)
Controls (No.=200) Statistical test p-value Odds ratio
No. % No. %
Encephalitis:
Yes 6 3.0 1 0.5 4.0 0.04 6.2
No 194 97.0 199 99.5
Meningitis:
Yes 7 3.5 1 0.5 5.2 0.03 7.2
No 193 96.5 199 99.5
Pyrexia of unknown origin:
Yes 9 4.5 2 1.0 4.6 0.03 4.7 No 191 95.5 198 99.0
Chicken pox:
Yes 12 6.0 6 3.0 2.0 N.S 2.0 No 188 94.0 194 97.0
Measles:
Yes 28 14.0 22 11.0 0.8 N.S 1.3 No 172 86.0 178 89.0
Tuberculosis:
Yes 2 1.0 – – 2.5 N.S –
No 198 99.0 200 100
Febrile convulsions:
Yes 13 6.5 1 0.5 10.7 0.001 13.8 No 187 93.5 199 99.5
Cerebral hemorrhage:
Yes 1 0.5 – – 1.0 N.S –
No 199 99.5 200 100
Brain tumors:
Yes 2 1.0 – – 2.0 N.S –
No 198 99.0 200 100
Past history of head trauma:
Yes 33 16.5 7 3.5 X2=18.8 0.000 5.5 No 167 83.5 193 96.5
Table (7): Logistic regression of the risk factors for epilepsy among epileptic school children,
Assiut Governorate, 2005.
Risk factor Regression coefficient p-value
1 Family history of epilepsy 1.5 0.0000
2 Low Socioeconomic Level 0.8 0.0002
3 Birth trauma 2.9 0.0003
4 Head trauma 1.6 0.0006
5 History of febrile convulsions 2.8 0.01
6 Neonatal jaundice 1.8 0.01
7 Premature rupture of membranes 1.3 0.01
8 Prematurity 2.7 0.02
%
40
20
60
0
46%
X2=28.6
p=0.000
Odds ratio=3.2
21%
%
40
20
60
0
p =N.S X2=2.6
46%
38%
Cases
Control
15
10
5
0
13.5 X2=12.9
p=0.000
Odds ratio=4.3
3.5
122 A Case Control Study of Epileptic School Children
Cases Control
Fig. (1): Family history of epilepsy.
Cases Control
Fig. (3): Consangunity.
Discussion
The etiology of epilepsy remained unknown in most cases and many studies sought to investi-gate the role of some factors in the etiology of
epilepsy [13] .
The present matched case-control study attempt-ed to identify some possible risk factors for child-hood epilepsy.
As regards risk factors for developing epilepsy. Findings of the present study accepted and sup-ported the following study hypotheses:
• Children who were exposed to head trauma, some
perinatal, infantile and childhood diseases, and those who have a family history of epilepsy are
at higher risk of developing epilepsy than those
who are not.
• Low socioeconomic class children are more affected by epilepsy than other children.
Logistic regression of data in the present study showed that the most important risk factors for developing epilepsy, according to significance,
Cases Control
Fig. (2): Family history of mental retardation.
were family history of epilepsy, low socioeconomic
level, birth trauma, head trauma, history of febrile
convulsions, neonatal jaundice, premature rupture
of membranes and prematurity, (Table 7). So, many
of these factors are preventable or at least modifi-able.
Background characteristics: In the present study 53.5% of epileptic cases
were males and 46.5% were females. Rural resi-dents represented 56.0% of cases while urban residents represented 44.0% (Table 1). In agreement
with the present study, Artemowicz, et al., 2003
[14] reported that 53.4% of epileptic children were
boys and 46.6% were girls while 44.4% of the children lived in cities and 55.6% in small towns or villages. Also El-Baz and El-Baz, [11] in their of epilepsy among female university students in Egypt reported that 72.5% of epileptics were rural residents versus 27.5% were urban residents.
Handedness: The results of the present study revealed that
significantly higher percent of epileptic cases were
left handed compared to controls (12.5% versus
3.0% respectively) and another 1.0% of cases can use both hand versus none of the controls.
Although this factor was not deeply discussed in many of the available previous studies, there are
some studies that may pave the way to the interpre-tation of this observation. For example, Van Strein et al., [15] in their study reported that the left-handed persons were more exposed to birth complications than the right-handed ones (Table 1).
Socioeconomic level:
The present study reported that the development
of epilepsy was significantly associated with low
socioeconomic state and there was statistical sig-nificant difference between cases and controls as
Etemad A.A. El-Shereef, et al. 123
regards the mean socioeconomic score ( p<0.001). This agrees with Heaney et al., [16] and Murphy et al., [17] who confirmed that epilepsy is signifi-cantly higher among persons in the low socioeco-nomic class. This finding is supported to some extent by the observation that the incidence of
epilepsy is higher in developing than developed countries [18] .
According to BBC 2002 [19] , researchers re-ported that poorer people are more likely to develop
epilepsy. This may be due to other risk factors
associated with epilepsy such as birth defects, which are known to be more common among de-prived groups. However, the explanation is not likely to be single cause and it is likely to be multifactorial (Table 1).
The result of the present study is in disagree-ment with El-Baz and El-Baz, [11] .
Antenatal, natal and perinatal risk factors:
Both pre-and perinatal factors may be associated
with later development of epileptic seizures in
children [20] .
While epilepsy can present at any age, this
condition often occurs because of adverse events
occurred early in life. Pathogenetic mechanisms
also cause deleterious consequences to the brain during prenatal life. Maternal, fetal, and placental disease also contribute to either brain malformation
or injuries, depending on events during the first or second half of pregnancy. Sequential stages during
prenatal brain development, from embryonic through
perinatal periods, specify which gray and white matter structures may be adversely altered [21] .
Intrauterine position of the child during pregnancy: Abnormal position of the baby during pregnancy
was detected in this study as a risk factor of sub-sequent epilepsy (Table 2). The abnormal position
during pregnancy may increase the risk of difficult
and prolonged labor especially in our community where neither mothers nor families prefer the early
intervention by cesarean section. This subsequently
can result in birth trauma and/or hypoxia and brain
injury and so increase the risk of subsequent epi-lepsy. In agreement with the present results. Krebs and Langhoff-Roos, [22] concluded that breech presentation was a risk factors for epilepsy (OR:
1.2) and this increased risk is not related to intra-partum events, but to growth restriction during
pregnancy.
Premature rupture of membranes during pregnancy: This factor showed statistical significant differ-
ence between cases and control in the present study
(p<0.01) (Table 2). Premature rupture of mem-branes may be an indicator of early exposure to
infection (intrauterine or perinatal infections).
Artemowicz et al., [14] also revealed that neuroin-fections in the neonatal period is a risk of epilepsy.
Birth order of the child:
The present study revealed that birth order of
the child did not show statistical significant differ-ence between cases and controls (Table 2). This is conforming to the results reported by Murphy et al., [17] who investigated the same factor.
Chapa and Ottman, [23] reported that even if there is an association between birth order and
epilepsy, it couldn’t be explained by any conven-tional genetic model because genetic transmission
is independent from sequential birth of the parents.
Mother’s history of bleeding during pregnancy: The present study revealed no statistical signif-
icant difference between cases and control as regard maternal history of bleeding during pregnancy
(p>0.05) (Table 2). The is conforming to what was
observed by Ogunniyi et al., [24] ; Rocca et al., [25] and Bertolote, [26] that mothers’ history of bleeding
during pregnancy did not constitute a risk for
developing epilepsy among children.
In contrast, Sidenvall et al., [20] reported an association between vaginal bleeding during preg-nancy and subsequent epilepsy.
Age of the mother at delivery:
Results of the present study showed no statis-tically significant difference between cases and
controls as regards mother’s age at delivery
(p>0.05) (Table 2). This is consistent with the results reported by Rocca et al., [25] ; Murphy et al., [17] and Asadi-Pooya & Hojabri, [27] that pa-rental age added no risk of epilepsy. In disagreement with the present study, Monetti et al., [28] and Shawki, [29] reported that maternal age >35 years
is risk in developing epilepsy.
Medical and obstetric problems to the mothers during pregnancy:
In the present study, there was an association
between histories of pre-eclampsia or eclampsia, hypertension and drug intake during pregnancy
and subsequent epilepsy, but this association did
not reach the level of statistical significance ( p> 0.05) (Table 3).
In agreement with our results, Rocca et al., 1987 [25] could not confirm an association between
gestational toxemia or eclampsia and epilepsy.
124 A Case Control Study of Epileptic School Children
Bertolote, [26] stated that “it is surprising to see that some factors such as toxaemia during preg-nancy, firmly believed on clinical grounds to cause epilepsy, failed to confirm this impression in the
controlled studies conducted”.
In this study, there was no statistical significant
association between epilepsy and medical problems during pregnancy such as heart diseases, renal
diseases, diabetes mellitus, or exposure to radiation
during pregnancy (p> 0.05) (Table 3). In agreement with the present study, Murphy et al., [17] did not confirm an association between mothers’ histories
of antenatal problems and the development of epilepsy among children.
Pre and postmaturity: This study showed that prematueity was a highly
significant risk factor for epilepsy (OR=16.3)
(Table 4). Prematurity can also be explained by
the need for incubator after birth, which also
showed statistically high significant difference
between cases and controls in our study (Table 6).
In agreement with the results of the present study, Sidenvall et al., [20] ; Murphy et al. [17] and Serdaroglu et al., [30] revealed that preterm delivery may be an important risk factor for epilepsy because
of its strong association with neonatal cerebral
lesions. In addition, Daoud et al., [31] reported that history of admission to the neonatal ICU increased the risk of epilepsy.
As regards postmaturity, the present study showed no statistically significant difference be-tween cases and controls (p>0.05). In consistence with the results of the present study, Rocca et al., [25] did not confirm postmaturity as risk for devel-oping epilepsy.
On the other hand, Sidenvall et al., 2001 [20] and Serdaroglu et al., [20] in their studies reported that post-term delivery increased the risk of devel-oping epilepsy.
Labor attendant: In the present study, it was observed that doctors
and nurses were the birth attendants among higher
percent of cases than control while dayas were the
birth attendants among higher percent of controls
than cases (Table 4).
This finding could be the results of NMMS,
[32] in Egypt that poor diagnosis and management of pregnancy and labor complications were prac-ticed by obstetricians and contributed to 43.0% of the avoidable causes of maternal mortality, another 11.0% were caused by general practitioners while
midwives and dayas contributed to 4.0% and 8.0% respectively. So most complicated labors were done by doctors either obstetricians or general
practitioners while the training programs conducted in Egypt by the MOHP in collaboration with UNICEF and USAID have been relatively success-ful in encouraging dayas to refer promptly women
with complications and to reduce the use of harmful
practices either to the mother or the fetus.
Type of labor and place of delivery:
The present study reported that 2.5% of cases
had been delivered by ventose or forceps (instru-mental delivery) versus none of the control (Table 4). In agreement with the present study, Mahesh-wari, [33] reported that significantly more children
who were delivered by forceps developed seizures.
The present study reported that more controls
were delivered by cesarean section than cases. This
can be interpreted by the avoidance of prolonged, obstructed labor and subsequent birth trauma, so
cesarean section can be considered as a protective
factor if normal labor cannot be attained. In dis-agreement with the present results, Sidenvall et al., [20] considered cesarean section as a risk factor
for developing epilepsy.
The present study revealed no significant dif-ference between cases and control as regards place
of delivery (Table 4). The same finding was also reported by Serdaroglu et al., [30] .
History of birth trauma, cyanosis after birth, crying immediately after birth:
The present study revealed that significantly
higher percent of epileptic cases had a history of
birth trauma and/or cyanosis after birth and also
significantly lower number of cases had a history of crying immediately after birth. In agreement
with the present study, Shawki, [29] and Daoud et al., [31] who confirmed significant association between birth trauma and subsequent epilepsy.
Artemowicz et al., [14] reported that the most common etiology of epilepsy was hypoxic-ischemic damages to the brain in the perinatal period. In
addition, Hackett et al., [34] in their studies con-cluded that histories of perinatal complications either perinatal hypoxia and/or intracranial birth
injury caused by poor obstetric management were
independently associated with active epilepsy.
Al-Rajeh et al., [35] concluded that the high incidence of associated perinatal encephalopathy
reported in their study suggests that perinatal factors
play a major role in the pathogenesis of epilepsy in Saudi Arabia.
Etemad A.A. El-Shereef, et al. 125
Mothers’ history of miscarriage: The present study showed no statistically sig-
nificant difference between cases and control as
regards maternal history of miscarriage and subse-quent epilepsy (Table 3). This is conforming to the
results reported by Rocca et al., [25] .
Neonatal risk factors: Neonatal convulsions:
The present study revealed an association be-tween neonatal convulsions and epilepsy (Table 5). In agreement with the present results, Daoud et al., [31] reported that neonatal seizures were
associated with a high incidence of postnatal epi-lepsy.
In addition, Aziz et al., [36] and Aziz et al., [37] reported positive history of neonatal convulsion among 14.3% of epileptic cases.
Neonatal seizures are considered an acute man-ifestation of disturbance of the neonatal brain.
Some of them could be considered as neonatal epilepsy [38] .
Neonatal jaundice:
In the present study, neonatal jaundice was
reported to be significantly increases the risk of
epilepsy (OR=10.3) (Table 5). This is consistent with the results reported by Aziz et al., [36] and Aziz et al., 1997b [37] reported of neonatal jaundice among 7.5% of epileptic cases. The present study
disagrees with the findings reported by Asadi-Pooya and Hojabri, [27] that neonatal jaundice added no risk for developing epilepsy.
History of exposure to disease (Table 6): This study revealed significant association
between epilepsy and history of meningitis (OR= 7.2), encephalitis (OR=6.2) and pyrexia of unknown
origin (OR=4.7). Pyrexia of unknown origin may be an indicator of undetectable CNS infection, which may be viral infection that cannot be diag-nosed by the available methods (Table 6).
In agreement with the results of the present study Daoud et al., [31] reported that patients with history of CNS infection were more than controls
but this difference did not reach the level of sig-nificance.
Febrile convulsions: The present study revealed an association be-
tween past history of febrile convulsions and epi-lepsy (OR=13.8) (Table 6). This is consistent with
the results reported by Bertolote, [26] who reported
an odds ratio of febrile convulsion as a risk for
epilepsy between 3.0-14.2.
In other studies, febrile seizures were reported
to be associated with five to six folds increased
risk of subsequent epilepsy [31] .
Brain tumors and cerebral hemorrhage:
The present results could not confirm an asso-ciation between neither cerebral space occupying
lesions nor cerebral hemorrhage and epilepsy (Table
6). This may be due to the small number of positive cases. These results disagree with the results re-ported by Danesi, [38] .
In the present study, history of brain tumors
was positive among 1.0% of epileptic cases. Al-Rajeh et al., [35] reported brain tumor among 0.5% of cases.
History of head trauma: In the present study, an association was reported
between history of head trauma and epilepsy with OR=5.5 (Table 6). This is consistent with the results
reported by Bertolote, [26] who calculated OR between 1.4-12.7.
The present study showed that the percentage
of head trauma among cases and control were
16.5% and 3.5% respectively. In agreement with
the results of the present study, Shawki, [29] in Assiut, Egypt reported the percentage of head
trauma among cases and controls to be 18.8% &
1.6 respectively.
In Saudi Arabia, Al-Rajeh et al., [35] reported cerebral trauma among 11.0% of cases. Daoud et
al., [31] had also confirmed head trauma as a risk
factor of epilepsy.
Family history of epilepsy:
The present study revealed that family history
of epilepsy was significantly higher among cases
than controls (Fig. 1).
Positive family history of epilepsy was also reported to be significantly higher among epileptic persons than non epileptics by Aimaan, 1996 [10] ; Shawki, [29] ; El-Baz and El-Baz, [11] ; and Murphy et al., [17] .
In the present study, positive family history of
epilepsy represented 46.0% and 21.0% among
cases and control s respectively. These results are
much higher than those observed by Shawki, [29] (22.0% and 7.2% for epileptics and non epileptics
respectively) and El-Baz and El-Baz, [11] who reported 17.5% and 0.6% for cases and controls respectively.
126 A Case Control Study of Epileptic School Children
Family history of mental retardation: The present study revealed that family history
of mental retardation was significantly higher among epileptics than controls (13.5% versus 3.5%
respectively) (Fig. 2).
The present results is higher than what was
reported in Egypt by Shawki, [29] that family history of mental retardation among epileptic cases repre-sented 4.2% and 3.9% respectively.
Parental consanguinity:
The present study reported that consanguinity was more common among the parents of epileptic
students than controls (46.0% versus 38.0%) with-out statistically significant difference ( p=0.09426) (Fig. 3).
In agreement with the present study, Daoud et
al., [31] confirmed that although consanguinity is
widely practiced in many developing countries, it
does not increase the risk of epilepsy as the majority
of genetically influenced epilepsy is multifactorial
where the positive family history reflects familial
aggregation.
In disagreement with the present study, Aimaan, [10] ; Shawki, [29] and El-Baz and El-Baz, [11] re-ported statistically insignificant difference between cases and controls as regards parental consanguin-ity.
Al-Rajeh et al., [35] confirmed that although consanguinity of the parents appeared not to be a
major factor in the genetics of convulsive disorders,
it might potentiate the tendency of familial aggre-gation of convulsive disorders in the community. Consanguinity may be an important factor in the
production of some of these disorders but its precise role has not been determined.
Recommendations: Raising the socioeconomic level of epileptic
persons by finding opportunities for them to edu-cation and employment to break the link between
epilepsy and poverty was recommended. Training
of the general practioners, obstetricians, and pedi-atricians about proper antenatal, natal and postnatal
care and management to avoid intrauterine infec-tions, birth trauma and neonatal problems is crucial.
References 1- WHO: World Health Organization. Epilepsy, another
neglected burden on the poor. Bulletin of the World Health
Organization, 79 (4): 3-9, 2001.
2- IBE: International Bureau for Epilepsy. Sixth Regional
Declaration on Epilepsy Completed: The latest news from
the global campaign against epilepsy. IBE publications,
Issue No. 1/2003.
3- BRADLEY R.: The educational needs of children with epilepsy. In: Epilepsy and education. Oxley J. and Stores G. (eds.). London, Education in Practice, 9-13, 1987.
4- PAZZAGLIA P. and FRANK-PAZZAGIA L.: Record in grade school of pupils with epilepsy: An epidemiological study. Epilepsia, (4): 361- 366, 1976.
5- CORBIDGE P.: Teacher training-attitudes towards epilepsy.
In: Epilepsy and education. Oxley J. and Stores G. London, Education in Practice, 31-34, 1987.
6- SHORVON S.D.: Epilepsy Octer: Epidemiology, classi-fication, natural history, and genetics. The Lancet, (336):
93-96, 1990.
7- LIY L., YIU C., YEN D., CHOU M. and LIN M.: Medi-cation education for patients with epilepsy in Taiwan, Seizure. Oct., 12 (7): 473-377, 2003.
8- KURTZ Z., TOOKEY P. and ROSS E.: Epilepsy in young people: 23 year follow-up of the British child development
study. British Medical Journal, 316: 339-342, 1998.
9- LAESSON K. and EEG-OLOFSSON O.: A population based study of epilepsy in children from a Swedish country. European Journal of Pediatric Neurology Apr., 22, 2006.
10- AIMMAN M.M.S.: Epidemiological study of epilepsy in school children of Hehia (Sharkia Governorate). Thesis submitted for partial fulfillment of Master degree in
neurology and psychological medicine, Faculty of Med-icine, Zagazig University, 1996.
11- EL-BAZ M.Z. and EL-BAZ T.Z.: Epilepsy among a group of female University students. The Egyptian Journal of
Community Medicine, 16 (1): 19-30, 1998.
12- ABDEL-TAWAB A.A.: Family socio-economic status scale, revised from thesis submitted for partial fulfillment of the doctor degree in educational basics; Faculty of
Education, Assiut University, 2004.
13- CASETTA I., MONETTI V.C., MALAGU S., PAOLINO E., GOVONI V., FAIARDI E., TOLA M.R. and GRAN-IERI E.: Risk factors for cryptogenic and idiopathic partial epiepsy: A community-based case-control study in Cop-paro, Italy, Neuroepidemiology, Sep.-Oct., 21 (5): 251- 254, 2002.
14- ARTEMOWICZ B., SOBANIEC W. and KUROCZYCKI-SANIUTYCZ S.: Analysis of the etiology, clinical picture and treatement of epiepsy in children in the northeastern
region of Poland. Seizure, 12 (3): 171-174.
15- VAN STREIN J.W., BOUMA A. and BAKKER D.J.: Birth stress, autoimmune and handiness. Journal of Clinical and Excremental Neuropsychiatry Dec., (6): 775-780, 1987.
16- HEANEY D.C., MAC DONALD B.K., EVETITT A., STTEVENSON S., LEONARDI G.S., et al.: Socioeco-nomic variation in incidence of epilepsy: Prospective
community based study in southeast England. Seizure,
11 (8): 483-488, 2002.
17- MURPHY D.J., LIBBY G., CHEIN P., FORSYTH S. and MORRIS A.: Cohort study of forceps delivery and risk of epilepsy in adulthood. American Journal of Obstetric and Gynecology Aug., 191 (2): 392-397, 2004.
Etemad A.A. El-Shereef, et al. 127
18- SANDER J.W. and SHORVON S.D.: Epidemiology of the epileptics. Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 61: 433-443, 1996.
19- BBC News. Epilepsy linked to poverty. World edition. Available at: HTTP:// news. Bbc. Co . uk/ 2/hi/ health/ 23 80869. stm.
20- SIDENVALL R., HEIJBEL J., BLOMQUIST H.K., NYS-TORM L. and FORSGERN L.: An incident case-control study of first unprovoked afebrile seizures in children: A
population-based study of pre- and perinatal risk factors.
Epilepsia Oct., 42 (10): 1261-1265, 2001.
21- SCHER M.S.: Prenatal contribution to epilepsy: Lessons
from the bedside. Epieptic Disorders Jun., 5 (2): 77-91,
2003.
22- KREBS L. and LANGHOFF-ROSS J.: The relation of
breech presentation at term to epilepsy in childhood. European Journal of Obst. and Gyncol. Repro. Biol. Jun.,
1-8, 2005.
23- CHAPA G.R. and OTTMAN R.: Birth order, sibship and
risk of epilepsy. Epilepsia, 35 (6): 1136-1139, 1994.
24- OGUNNIYI A., OSONTOKUN O. and BADERMOSI O.: Risk factors for epilepsy: Case-control study in Nige-rians. Epilepsy, 28: 280-285, 1987.
25- ROCCA W.A., SHARBROUGH F.W., HAUSER W.A., et al.: Risk factors for generalized tonic-clonic seizures:
A population-based case-control study in Rochester, Minnesota Neurology Aug., 37 (8): 1315-1322, 1987.
26- BERTOLOTE J.M.: Guidelines for the primary prevention of mental, neurological and psychological; disorders.
WHO document WHO/MNH/MND/90.23. World Health Organization; 1211, Geneva 27, Swizerland, 1988.
27- ASADI-POOYA A.A. and HOJABRI K.: Risk factors for
childhood epilepsy: A case-control study. Epilepsy Be-havior Mar., 6 (2): 203-206, 2005.
28- MONETTI V.C., GRANIERI E., CASETTA L., TOLA M.R., et al.: Risk factors for idiopathic generalized sei-zures: A population-based case control study in Copparo,
Italy. EIepsia Mar., 36 (3): 224-229, 1995.
29- SHAWKI O.A.: Clinico-epidemiologic study of epilepsy
in Assiut. Thesis submitted for partial fulfillment of doctor degree in neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut Univer-sity, 1996.
30- SERDAROGLU A., OZKAN S., AYDIN K., et al.: Prev-alence of epilepsy in Turkish children between the ages of 0 and 16 years. Journal of Children Neurology Apr., 19 (4): 271-274, 2004.
31- DAOUD A.S., BATIEHA A., BASHTAWI M. and EL-SHANTI H.: Risk factors for childhood epiepsy: A case-control study from Irbid, Jordan. Seizure, 12 (3): 171- 174, 2003.
32- NMMs. National Maternal Mortality Study; Egypt, Ma-ternal and Child Health Care, Healthy Child Project, 2000.
33- MAHESHWARI M.C.: Forceps delivery as a risk factor in epilepsy: A comprehensive prospective cohort survey. Acta. Neurologica Scandinavia Jun., 81 (6): 522-523, 1990.
34- HACKETT R., HACKETT L. and BHAKTA P.: The prevalence and associated factors of epilepsy in children
in Calicut District, Kerala, India. Acta. Paediatrica Nov.,
86 (11): 1257-1260, 1997.
35- AL-RAJEH S., AWADA A., BADEMOSI O. and OJUN-NIYI A.: Eiplepsy and other convulsive disorders in Saudi Arabia: A prospective study of 1000 consecutive cases. Acta Neurologica Scandinavia Nov., 82 (5): 341-345,
1990.
36- AZIZ H., ALI S.M. and FRANCES P.: Epilepsy in Paki-stan: A population-based study. Epilepsia, 35: 950-958,
1994.
37- AZIZ H., GUVENER A. and AKHTAR S.W.: Compre-hensive epidemiology of epilepsy in Pakistan and Turkey: Poulation-based studies using identical protocols. Epilep-sia, 38: 716-722, 1997b.
38- DANESI M.A.: Acquired etiological factors in Nigerian epileptics (an investigation of 378 patients). Tropical and Geographical Medicine Sep., 35 (3): 293-297, 1983.