31
A comparison of remotely A comparison of remotely sensed imagery with site- sensed imagery with site- specific crop management data specific crop management data Anjelien Drost Anjelien Drost Land Resource Science Land Resource Science University of Guelph University of Guelph

A comparison of remotely sensed imagery with site-specific crop management data

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

A comparison of remotely sensed imagery with site-specific crop management data. Anjelien Drost Land Resource Science University of Guelph. Outline. Introduction Objectives Data Acquisition Methodology Results Conclusion. Introduction. Technology in Agriculture. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: A comparison of remotely sensed imagery with site-specific crop management data

A comparison of remotely A comparison of remotely sensed imagery with site-sensed imagery with site-specific crop management specific crop management

datadata

A comparison of remotely A comparison of remotely sensed imagery with site-sensed imagery with site-specific crop management specific crop management

datadata

Anjelien DrostAnjelien Drost

Land Resource ScienceLand Resource Science

University of GuelphUniversity of Guelph

Page 2: A comparison of remotely sensed imagery with site-specific crop management data

• IntroductionIntroduction• ObjectivesObjectives• Data AcquisitionData Acquisition• MethodologyMethodology• ResultsResults• ConclusionConclusion

OutlineOutline

Page 3: A comparison of remotely sensed imagery with site-specific crop management data

IntroductionIntroduction

Technology in AgricultureTechnology in Agriculture

Changes in farming practices due to Changes in farming practices due to

advent of new technologies:advent of new technologies:

• Global Positioning Systems (GPS)Global Positioning Systems (GPS)• Yield monitorsYield monitors• Geographic Information Systems (GIS)Geographic Information Systems (GIS)• Remote SensingRemote Sensing

Page 4: A comparison of remotely sensed imagery with site-specific crop management data

IntroductionIntroduction

ApplicationsApplications

These technologies have lead to:These technologies have lead to:

• On-the-go yield mappingOn-the-go yield mapping• GPS soil sampling for nutrient mappingGPS soil sampling for nutrient mapping• Variable application of fertilizersVariable application of fertilizers• Ability to manage large acreageAbility to manage large acreage• GPS field scouting for pests, weeds, GPS field scouting for pests, weeds,

diseasedisease

Page 5: A comparison of remotely sensed imagery with site-specific crop management data

IntroductionIntroduction

ObjectivesObjectives

• to determine the steps involved in to determine the steps involved in analysing CASI imagery for SSCManalysing CASI imagery for SSCM

• to use acquired knowledge of image to use acquired knowledge of image analysis software (PCI Geomatics) and GIS analysis software (PCI Geomatics) and GIS software (ESRI) to correlate imagery to software (ESRI) to correlate imagery to SSCM data.SSCM data.

Page 6: A comparison of remotely sensed imagery with site-specific crop management data

IntroductionIntroduction

Data Acquisition- ImageryData Acquisition- Imagery• Compact Airborne Spectragraphic Imager Compact Airborne Spectragraphic Imager

(CASI)(CASI)

Band Wavelength (nm) Color spectrum3 432.20-466.30 Blue

4 526.94-552.42 Green

5 628.55-654.27 Red

6 736.84-762.73 Near Infrared

7 838.12-864.09 Near Infrared

8 931.93-948.33 Near Infrared

Page 7: A comparison of remotely sensed imagery with site-specific crop management data

IntroductionIntroduction

Data Acquisition- ImageryData Acquisition- Imagery• False color imageFalse color image

Page 8: A comparison of remotely sensed imagery with site-specific crop management data

IntroductionIntroduction

Data Acquisition- YieldData Acquisition- Yield

• Grain monitor on a yield combine attached to a Grain monitor on a yield combine attached to a differential global positioning system.differential global positioning system.

• Every 1.5mEvery 1.5m

Page 9: A comparison of remotely sensed imagery with site-specific crop management data

IntroductionIntroduction

Data Acquisition- SoilsData Acquisition- Soils

• 1995 sampling on a 30m grid1995 sampling on a 30m grid• Organic matter content, soil texture, pHOrganic matter content, soil texture, pH

Organic Matter pH

Soil texture

Page 10: A comparison of remotely sensed imagery with site-specific crop management data

IntroductionIntroduction

Data - Standard statisticsData - Standard statistics

StatisticYield

(kg/ha)OrganicMatter

pH

Sum 57152963.0256 796.2 1522.6Count 21216 242 250Mean 2693.861 3.3 6.1Minimum 0 0.4 3.8Maximum 5946.315 6.9 7.7Range 5946.315 6.5 3.9Median 3016.83 3.3 6.2StandardDeviation

1358.88 1.228 0.8708

CV (%) 50.4 37.3 14.3Skewness -0.76 0.21 -0.5Kurtosis -0.48 -0.15 -0.46

Page 11: A comparison of remotely sensed imagery with site-specific crop management data

MethodologyMethodology

• Image correctionImage correction• Unsupervised ClassificationUnsupervised Classification• Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI)Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI)• Classified surface interpolationsClassified surface interpolations• Gridded data pointsGridded data points

Page 12: A comparison of remotely sensed imagery with site-specific crop management data

Unsupervised Unsupervised ClassificationClassification

• K-means unsupervised classificationK-means unsupervised classification• red, and NIR bands red, and NIR bands • aggregated into four (high, high-medium, medium-low, low)aggregated into four (high, high-medium, medium-low, low)

Place classified image here

Page 13: A comparison of remotely sensed imagery with site-specific crop management data

NDVINDVI• (NIR -RED)/(NIR + RED)• NDVI * 1000

Place classified image here

Page 14: A comparison of remotely sensed imagery with site-specific crop management data

InterpolationsInterpolations• Inverse Distance Weighted • Reclassified into classes

Page 15: A comparison of remotely sensed imagery with site-specific crop management data

InterpolationsInterpolations• Inverse Distance Weighted • Reclassified into classes

Page 16: A comparison of remotely sensed imagery with site-specific crop management data

Grid PointsGrid Points

• Converted points to grid • 3 m resolution• Compared these to NIR and NDVI bands• Pixel to pixel analysis

Page 17: A comparison of remotely sensed imagery with site-specific crop management data

ResultsResults• Comparison of yield to image

- classified image to classified yield- classified image to grid yield- NDVI to grid yield

- NDVI to classified yield

• Comparison of soil properties to image- OM- soil texture- pH

Page 18: A comparison of remotely sensed imagery with site-specific crop management data

YieldYield

• Classified to classified • R2 = 0.71• y= 0.76x+0.56

Page 19: A comparison of remotely sensed imagery with site-specific crop management data

YieldYield• Gridded yield to classified image • High yield values in class 4 (high)• Low yield values in class 1 (low)

Page 20: A comparison of remotely sensed imagery with site-specific crop management data

YieldYield

• NDVI values to classified yield • High NDVI values in class 4 (high yield)• Lower NDVI values in class 1 (low yield)

Page 21: A comparison of remotely sensed imagery with site-specific crop management data

YieldYield• Gridded yield to NDVI values• R2 = 0.59

Page 22: A comparison of remotely sensed imagery with site-specific crop management data

ProblemsProblemsInstrument

Errors

Product

Yield Monitor

Spectrographic Imager

Global Positioning

System

• GPS from monitor• yield sensor• crop moisture• interpolation

• GPS• sensor calibration• image registration

• positional errors• interpolation

Georeferenced Yield map

NDVI

Digital Elevation Model

Core

gistra

tion

erro

rs

Source: M. Wood et al., 1997

Page 23: A comparison of remotely sensed imagery with site-specific crop management data

Organic matter contentOrganic matter content• Interpolated organic matter map

Page 24: A comparison of remotely sensed imagery with site-specific crop management data

Organic matter contentOrganic matter content• Organic matter values in classified image

Page 25: A comparison of remotely sensed imagery with site-specific crop management data

Soil TextureSoil Texture

• Interpolated soil texture map

Page 26: A comparison of remotely sensed imagery with site-specific crop management data

Soil TextureSoil Texture• NDVI distribution in soil texture classes• low NDVI values in fine sandy areas• high NDVI values in loamy soils

Page 27: A comparison of remotely sensed imagery with site-specific crop management data

Soil TextureSoil Texture• Soil texture class distribution in classified image• Fine sands fall into class 1 and 2• more loamy soils in class 3 and 4

Page 28: A comparison of remotely sensed imagery with site-specific crop management data

pHpH

• Interpolated pH map

Page 29: A comparison of remotely sensed imagery with site-specific crop management data

pHpH• pH distribution in classified image• higher pH in class 4

Page 30: A comparison of remotely sensed imagery with site-specific crop management data

SSCMSSCM

Conclusions Conclusions

• One image provides quite accurate insight into One image provides quite accurate insight into crop yield variabilitycrop yield variability

• Can use NDVI or classified image for interpretationCan use NDVI or classified image for interpretation• Imagery is also an indicator of the variability of soil Imagery is also an indicator of the variability of soil

properties properties • always remember sources of erroralways remember sources of error• Imagery has the potential to predict yield Imagery has the potential to predict yield

variabilityvariability

Page 31: A comparison of remotely sensed imagery with site-specific crop management data

QuestionsQuestions??