Upload
phamlien
View
216
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
HENRY COUNTYSCHOOLS
Our Mission Our Vision Our BeliefsWe are committed to provide rigorous academic instruction and an environment in which every student is afforded the opportunity to succeed.
DMS will continue to produce students who excel academically and behave
appropriately. All students will be self-motivated, eager to learn, work well with other students; thus discipline issue will
decrease. DMS will continue to celebrate diversity and will be one of the top
performing middle schools in the state of Georgia.
We believe:*All students will learn
*Diversity will be celebrated*Respect is the foundation of positive
relationships*Every stakeholder is important
*Academics, Sports, and Fine Arts are key components to our school
Focus 1:Student
Achievement
Jan-Dec 2013 Jan-Dec 2014 Jan-Dec 2015 Jan-Dec 2016 Jan-Dec 201790% of 8th graders will
meet/ exceed standards on the the
Middle Grades Writing Assessment;
with 30% of these students exceeding
the standards.
93% of 8th graders will meet/ exceed
standards on the the Middle Grades
Writing Assessment; with 50% of these
students exceeding the standards.
95% of 8th graders will meet/ exceed
standards on the the Middle Grades
Writing Assessment; with 60% of these
students exceeding the standards.
98% of 8th graders will meet/ exceed
standards on the the Middle Grades
Writing Assessment; with 70% of these
students exceeding the standards.
100% of 8th graders will meet/ exceed
standards on the the Middle Grades
Writing Assessment; with 75% of these
students exceeding the standards.
Special Education students meeting standards on the
CRCT
Special Education students meeting
90% of all students meeting standards on the
PARCC
93% of all students meeting
standards on
95% of all students meeting
standards on
Dutchtown Middle School: 5-Year Strategic Plan
standards on the CRCT
the PARCC the PARCC
System Level
CCGPS-Implementation
CCRPIPOINT (fna SchNet)
Assessment & RTI
CCGPS-Across Contents
CCRPIPOINT (fna
SchNet) Curriculum Instruction
CCGPS-PARCCCCRPI
POINT (fna SchNet) Full Implementation
CCGPS-Full Integration
CCRPI
CCRPI
Focus 2:Culture, Climate
& Community
Jan-Dec 2013 Jan-Dec 2014 Jan-Dec 2015 Jan-Dec 2016 Jan-Dec 2017IFP (Instructional
Focus Period)IFP (Student
efficacy & RTI)IFP (Acceleration) IFP (Acceleration) IFP( Acceleration
& RTI)BYOT (Student &
Parents)Parent University
(DHS)Grade Level – Community Connections
BYOT (Students & Parents)Cluster
Community RallyGrade Level – Community Connections
BYOT
Academic Gender-Based Classroom
Cluster Community Rally
Grade Level – Community Connections
BYOTSTEM School
Uniforms
Academic Gender-Based Classroom
Cluster Community Rally
Grade Level –Community Connections
BYOTSTEM School
Uniforms
Academic Gender-Based Classroom
Cluster Community Rally
Grade Level –Community Connections
System Level
Culture of Support
RTI Owner / School Based Pyramid of
Interventions
Culture of Support
Instructional Focus Period
Focus 3:Quality
Assurance
Jan-Dec 2013 Jan-Dec 2014 Jan-Dec 2015 Jan-Dec 2016 Jan-Dec 201775% of the
teachers will score Proficient/Exempla
ry on all 10 TKES standards
80% of the teachers will score
Proficient/Exemplary on all 10 TKES
standards
85% of the teachers will score
Proficient/Exemplary on all 10 TKES
standards
95% of the teachers will score
Proficient/Exemplary on all 10 TKES
standards
100% of the teachers will score
Proficient/Exemplary on all 10 TKES
standardsProfessional
Learning (GAPPS data)
Professional Learning (GAPPS
data)
Professional Learning (GAPPS
data)
Peer Evaluations/Interna
l
Peer Evaluations/Interna
l
System Level
TKES/LKES – Year 1
System Wide
TKES/LKES Internal GAPSS Internal GAPSS
The implementation of the strategies and initiatives will be monitored through the Annual Action Plan
Focus Area: Student Achievement.Measureable Goal(s): To increase or maintain the 2012 CRCT achievements as described on each of the concurrent pages.
School Keys Strands and Standards
Actions, Strategies, and Interventions
Implementation date/Completion date
Estimated Costs and Funding Sources, and Resources
*Primary Initiative owner/ Team members
Evaluation of Implementation of Strategies and Impact on Student Learning
Artifacts Evidence
I 2.1 Compacting Instruction: continuously provide a review of material through warm-ups and assessments of previously learned material
Beginning in Oct.
At least 2x’s a week.
Paper costs ($100.00)
6th grade Sci. Teachers
Students are responsible for keeping warm-ups in ISN
Lesson Plans Warm-ups Assessments
Students can articulate previously learned material
Data Analysis shows mastery of concepts (previous material)
C 2.1 Collaborative Planning: teachers will meet at least once a week to plan collaborative lessons, assessments, and share teaching strategies
Weekly None 6th grade Sci. Teachers
Planning Minutes
Each teacher will bring one new activity/strategy to share
Common assessments, EQ’s, Standards, and activities
Students can articulate what they are learning and why
AL 1.3 Differentiated Instruction: process, product, and/or environments will be differentiated in order to meet students’ needs
Beginning in Oct.
At least 2x’s a month
Book Resources ($50)
Professional Learning Courses ($?)
6th grade Sci. Teachers
Student’s Interest Inventory and surveys
Lesson Plans Interest
Inventory Performance
Tasks Projects
Students can articulate or show mastery of concepts through various means
Focus Area: Student Achievement.Measureable Goal(s): To increase or maintain the 2012 CRCT achievements as described on each of the concurrent pages.
School Keys Strands and Standards
Actions, Strategies, and Interventions
Implementation date/Completion date
Estimated Costs and Funding Sources, and Resources
*Primary Initiative owner/ Team members
Evaluation of Implementation of Strategies and Impact on Student Learning
Artifacts Evidence
AL 1.2 Student self-analysis of progress/performance
Bi-Weekly beginning in October
None Students will conduct self-reflection
Teachers will be responsible for giving self-analysis
Students’ journal response
Student grouping based on needs from self-reflection
Increase in mastery on assessments
I 2.3 Tie in real-life connections to peak students interests and make connections between content and real-life experiences/events
Weekly None Teachers Lesson Plans Performance
Tasks/Labs
Students can articulate relationships between what they are learning and it’s importance to real world
AL 1.3 Differentiated Instruction: process, product, and/or environments will be differentiated in order to meet students’ needs
Beginning in Oct.
At least 2x’s a month
Book Resources ($50)
Professional Learning Courses (?)
6th grade Teachers
Student’s Interest Inventory
Lesson Plans Interest
Inventory Performance
Tasks Projects
Student’s interest will be enhanced as subject material is focused to their interests
Increase in mastery on assessments
Focus Area: Student Achievement.Measureable Goal(s): To increase or maintain the 2012 CRCT achievements as described on each of the concurrent pages.
School Keys Strands and Standards
Actions, Strategies, and Interventions
Implementation date/Completion date
Estimated Costs and Funding Sources, and Resources
*Primary Initiative owner/ Team members
Evaluation of Implementation of Strategies and Impact on Student Learning
Artifacts Evidence
AL 1.2 Using frequent formative assessments for progress monitoring
Daily/ Weekly
Paper All 8th grade science teachers
Lesson plans, flexible grouping, differentiated assignments
Increase the number of students scoring above 80% on tests and assignments
AL 1.3 Using differentiated instruction to assess student mastery of the GPS
Weekly None All 8th grade science teachers
Lesson plans, differentiated assignments (based on multiple intelligences tests)
Allow students to choose appropriate methods to demonstrate their achievement
AL 1.1 Using data from formative assessments to drive planning and adjust instruction
Daily/ Weekly
None All 8th grade science teachers
Lesson plans, differentiated assignments, flexible groupings
Increase of student scores on formative assessments. Students can articulate previously learned standards throughout the year.
Focus Area: Student Achievement.Measureable Goal(s): To increase or maintain the 2012 CRCT achievements as described on each of the concurrent pages.
School Keys Strands and Standards
Actions, Strategies, and Interventions
Implementation date/Completion date
Estimated Costs and Funding Sources, and Resources
*Primary Initiative owner/ Team members
Evaluation of Implementation of Strategies and Impact on Student Learning
Artifacts Evidence
I 2.1 Teachers will include previously covered standards on all warm-ups and future assessments beginning in October.
Daily None All 8th grade science teachers
Students are responsible for warm-ups.
Warm-ups Assessments Lesson plans
Increase of student scores on formative assessments. Students can articulate previously learned standards throughout the year
C 2.1 Teachers will collaborate weekly to design lesson plans, common assessments, and share best practices
Weekly None All 8th grade science teachers
Meeting minutes Lesson plans
Increased student achievement on common formative assessments and reduction in failing grades.
I 2.3 25% of our instructional time will be used for labs or hands on instruction during each semester.
August 11- May 12
$200 for additional supplies and lab equipment
All 8th grade science teachers
Student completed lab reports
Lesson plans
Students will be able to articulate lab concepts related to the standard and reduction in failing grades
Focus Area: Student Achievement.Measureable Goal(s): To increase or maintain the 2012 CRCT achievements as described on each of the concurrent pages.
School Keys Strands and Standards
Actions, Strategies, and Interventions
Implementation date/Completio
n date
Estimated Costs and Funding
Sources, and Resources
*Primary Initiative owner/ Team
members
Evaluation of Implementation of Strategies and Impact on Student Learning
Artifacts Evidence
AL 1.2 Using frequent formative assessments for progress monitoring
Daily/Weekly Paper All social studies teachers
Lesson plans Flexible
grouping Differentiated
assignments
Increase the number of students scoring above 80% on tests and assignments
Focus Area: Student Achievement.Measureable Goal(s): To increase or maintain the 2012 CRCT achievements as described on each of the concurrent pages.
School Keys Strands and Standards
Actions, Strategies, and Interventions
Implementation date/Completion date
Estimated Costs and Funding Sources, and Resources
*Primary Initiative owner/ Team members
Evaluation of Implementation of Strategies and Impact on Student Learning
Artifacts Evidence
I 2.1 Teachers will include previously covered standards on all warm-ups and future assessments beginning in October to review standards not previously mastered.
Daily None All science teachers
Students are responsible for warm-ups.
Warm-ups Assessments Lesson plans
Increase of student scores on formative assessments. Students can articulate previously learned standards throughout the year.
C 2.1 Teachers will collaborate weekly to design lesson plans, common assessments, and share best practices to make classes more consistent.
Weekly None All science teachers
Meeting minutes Lesson plans
Increased student achievement on common formative assessments and reduction in failing grades.
I 2.3 25% of our instructional time will be used for labs or hands on instruction during each semester to peak student interest in science.
August 11- May 12
$200 for additional supplies and lab equipment
All science teachers
Student completed lab reports
Lesson plans
Students will be able to articulate lab concepts related to the standard and reduction in failing grades.
Focus Area: Student Achievement.Measureable Goal(s): To increase or maintain the 2012 CRCT achievements as described on each of the concurrent pages.
School Keys Strands and Standards
Actions, Strategies, and Interventions
Implementation date/Completion date
Estimated Costs and Funding Sources, and Resources
*Primary Initiative owner/ Team members
Evaluation of Implementation of Strategies and Impact on Student Learning
Artifacts Evidence
AL1.1 Teachers use diagnostic assessment strategies to identify individual and class strengths, misconceptions, and areas of weaknesses in order to inform planning.
Aug., Nov., Jan., and March
None Dept. Chair Curriculum
Chair
Diagnostic Tests Lesson Plans
Improved test scores Teaching directed
toward standards not mastered.
CP 1.1 Teachers will collaborate to design lesson plans and common assessments, and to share ideas and practices.
Every Thursday August - May
0 Curriculum Chair
Common lesson plans, assessments
Student articulation and understanding of the standard being taught
Shared teaching styles, creativity and rigor
AL 1.2 Teachers will implement formative and performance-based assessments based on data analysis of pre-tests and EOTT Exams
Daily 0 7th Grade Math Data Team
Lesson plans, quizzes, teacher assessments, class work, performance-based activities
Increase in scores on quizzes, unit tests, and standardized tests
Focus Area: Student Achievement.Measureable Goal(s): To increase or maintain the 2012 CRCT achievements as described on each of the concurrent pages.
School Keys Strands and Standards
Actions, Strategies, and Interventions
Implementation date/Completion date
Estimated Costs and Funding Sources, and Resources
*Primary Initiative owner/ Team members
Evaluation of Implementation of Strategies and Impact on Student Learning
Artifacts Evidence
SB2.3 Compile a list of effective feedback for commentary on assignment like Classwork, quizzes, and tasks.
Oct 2012Feb 2013
Olivia Jones-PL Coordinator
List of appropriate commentary
Student work samples with commentary
Increase teacher comfort level as it relates to communication.
AL 1.3 Using differentiated instruction and flexible grouping to assess student mastery of the GPS/CCGPS
Weekly $75 for training
All teachers PL
Coordinator Dr. McCray
Lesson plans, differentiated assignments (based on multiple intelligences tests)
Allow students to choose appropriate methods to demonstrate their achievement
AL 1.1 Using data from formative assessments to drive planning and adjust instruction
Daily/ Weekly None All science teachers
Lesson plans, differentiated assignments, flexible groupings
Increase of student scores on formative assessments. Students can articulate previously learned standards throughout the year.
Teachers can articulate resource and plan of action.
Focus Area: Student AchievementMath Department Measureable Goal(s): To maintain the percentage of students performing at levels 2 and 3 on the math portion of the CRCT at 91% and increase the percentage of students performing at level 3 on the math portion of the CRCT by 3% from 37% to 40% using the 2011 CRCT scores as a baseline.
School Keys Strands and Standards
Actions, Strategies, and Interventions
Implementation date/Completion
date
Estimated Costs and Funding
Sources, and Resources
*Primary Initiative owner/ Team
members
Evaluation of Implementation of Strategies and Impact on Student Learning
Artifacts Evidence
P 3.1 Implement strategies on Standards-based Teaching and Learning in the Mathematics Classroom
Various Dates throughout the yearNov. 2012- Feb. 2013
None Henry County Learning and Teaching Services
Materials supplied from the learning and teaching services
Increase presence/knowledge & strategies of standards-based instruction.
SBI 1.5 Use of ALEKS—A web-based artificially intelligent assessment and learning system that uses adaptive questioning. (Special Education Students)
80 minutes per week
Covered by county funds
Special education teachers
Online reports Aleks Reports
Decrease in level one CRCT scores
Increase scores on EOTT
Academic growth on 9 weeks reports
SBI 1.5 Provide extra support for struggling learners and/or students that did not pass the CRCT the previous year or who didn’t achieve the cut score on GRASP.
40 minutes twice per week
$180 per grade level per month. TOTAL: $540/month of SIEP funds
Two Math teacher per grade level
Classwork and performance-based activities
GRASP Data
Increase in quiz scores, test scores, and overall performance on standards
SBI1.2 Teachers emphasize and encourage all learners to use higher order thinking skills and processes
Daily None Sixth Grade Math Teachers
Classwork, Performance Based Activities
Increase in scores on formative and summative assessments.
SBI1.1 Teachers demonstrate research based practices for student engagement (use of manipulative’s).
Aug 2012- May 2013
Class set of fraction tiles, cubes, and circles.
TOTAL: $756.00
Technology
Sixth Grade Math Teachers
Lesson plans including use of manipulatives
Increase in abstract thinking and problem solving due to increased representation of concepts
Focus Area: To implement high quality instructional practices that maximize student achievement.Science Department Measureable Goal(s): To increase the number of 7th grade students performing at level 2 and 3 on the science portion of the CRCT by 2% from 84% to 86% using the 2011 CRCT scores as the baseline.
School Keys Strands and Standards
Actions, Strategies, and Interventions
Implementation date/Completion
date
Estimated Costs and Funding
Sources, and Resources
*Primary Initiative owner/ Team
members
Evaluation of Implementation of Strategies and Impact on Student Learning
Artifacts Evidence
I 2.3 Implementation of differentiated instruction based on multiple intelligences
August 2011 to May 2012
Consumables 7th grade classroom teachers
Student produced work, labs
Increase in formative and summative assessments, students can articulate/demonstrate content mastery
A 1.4 Extend instructional time teaching and reviewing the domain of evolution
March 2012 to April 2012
n/a 7th grade classroom teachers
Extended review lessons, weekly evolution warm-ups, evolution activities and labs
Overall increase in progress for evolution domain, student can identify what is needed to meet the expectations for the CRCT’s
I 2.3 Implementation of Differentiated Instruction with high interest levels for all students for both male and female
Weekly2012-2012
n/a 7th grade science teachers
Pre-assessments to determine prior knowledge, lesson plans, heterogeneous grouping
Increased scores in all formative and summative assessments for all students and CRCT’s
Focus Area: To implement high quality instructional practices that maximize student achievement.Science Department Measureable Goal(s): To increase the number of 7th grade students performing at level 2 and 3 on the science portion of the CRCT by 2% from 84% to 86% using the 2011 CRCT scores as the baseline.
School Keys Strands and Standards
Actions, Strategies, and Interventions
Implementation date/Completion
date
Estimated Costs and Funding
Sources, and
*Primary Initiative owner/ Team
members
Evaluation of Implementation of Strategies and Impact on Student Learning
Artifacts EvidenceFocus Area: To implement high quality instructional practices that maximize student achievement.Science Department Measureable Goal(s): To increase the number of 7th grade students performing at level 2 and 3 on the science portion of the CRCT by 2% from 84% to 86% using the 2011 CRCT scores as the baseline.
School Keys Strands and Standards
Actions, Strategies, and Interventions
Implementation date/Completion date
Estimated Costs and Funding Sources, and Resources
*Primary Initiative owner/ Team members
Evaluation of Implementation of Strategies and Impact on Student Learning
Artifacts Evidence
I 2.3 Increased relevant (real world) applications in the area of science through reading
Weekly2012-2012
n/a 7th grade science teachers
Newspaper articles, science magazines, internet sources,
Students ability to articulate the mastery of science concepts via oral and written communication
Focus Area: Student Achievement (Writing)
Measureable Goal(s) 1: To increase 8th grade students writing scores on the Middle Grades Writing Assessment (MGWA) by 5% from 80% to 85% using the 2011 MGWA scores as the baseline benchmark data.
Measureable Goal(s) 2: To increase SPED students writing scores on the Middle Grades Writing Assessment (MGWA) by 2% from 63% to 65% using the 2011 MGWA scores as the baseline benchmark data.
School Keys Strands and Standards
Actions, Strategies, and Interventions
Implementation date/Completion date
Estimated Costs and Funding Sources, and Resources
*Primary Initiative owner/ Team members
Evaluation of Implementation of Strategies and Impact on Student Learning
Artifacts Evidence
SBI 1.3 Practice writing, editing and revising persuasive and expository work samples in order to monitor and guide student progress through varied forms (i.e. small group instruction, teacher & peer editing and revising, Socratic Seminar for 8th grade, etc.)
August 2012-January 2013
paper -one case @ $25.00 per case
8th grade ELA Teachers
My ACCESS student papers, rough drafts, final drafts, Write Score, POINT
Student work (journals, writing practice samples, projects
My ACCESS student data analysis information
Increase in student writing scores in targeted domains from MGWA rubric (Ideas/Organization).
Students will articulate understanding of different types of writing format (argumentative vs. expository); (letter writing vs. constructed essay vs. journal entries)
Focus Area: Student Achievement (Writing)
Measureable Goal(s) 1: To increase 8th grade students writing scores on the Middle Grades Writing Assessment (MGWA) by 5% from 80% to 85% using the 2011 MGWA scores as the baseline benchmark data.
Measureable Goal(s) 2: To increase SPED students writing scores on the Middle Grades Writing Assessment (MGWA) by 2% from 63% to 65% using the 2011 MGWA scores as the baseline benchmark data.School Keys Strands and Standards
Actions, Strategies, and Interventions
Implementation date/Completion date
Estimated Costs and Funding Sources, and
*Primary Initiative owner/ Team members
Evaluation of Implementation of Strategies and Impact on Student LearningArtifacts Evidence
AL 1.1 Utilize My ACCESS, POINT, and Write Score writing programs during specified lad times to reinforce writing domains identified from MGWA rubric.
September 2012-January 2013
MY ACCESS paid license
Computer Carts (no cost)
8th grade ELA Teachers
Parents
Students
MGWA rubrics
Student writing samples
Conference documentation sheets/portfolio
My ACCESS, POINT, Write Score writing promptsand graded results with feedback.
Students are able to articulate areas of growth and weakness in specific writing domains based on teacher commentary from MGWA rubric.
Increase student scores on mock writing assessment.
Focus Area: Student Achievement (Formative/ Summative Assessments)
Measureable Goal(s): To increase the average percentage of students 6-8th grade scoring “Met” to achieve “Exceeds” standards on the Language Arts portion of the CRCT by 3% from 60% to 63% using the 2011 CRCT scores as a baseline for benchmark data.
School Keys Strands and Standards
Actions, Strategies, and Interventions
Implementation date/Completion date
Estimated Costs and Funding Sources, and Resources
*Primary Initiative owner/ Team members
Evaluation of Implementation of Strategies and Impact on Student Learning
Artifacts Evidence
AL 1.2 Conduct conferencing 1 on 1, between student and teacher, based on the mock writing assessment results
October 2012 – May 2013
paper for student data analysis results —one case @ $25.00 per case
6th-8th grade ELA Teachers
MGWA rubrics with teacher commentary
Diagnostic student writing samples
Students are able to articulate areas of growth and deficiency based on teacher commentary and self- evaluation through MGWA rubric
Focus Area: Connections
Measureable Goal(s): To integrate at least 50% of written assessments in Point.
School Keys Strands and Standards
Actions, Strategies, and Interventions
Implementation date/Completion date
Estimated Costs and Funding Sources, and Resources
*Primary Initiative owner/ Team members
Evaluation of Implementation of Strategies and Impact on Student Learning
Artifacts Evidence
AL 1.2 Teacher will use formative and summative assessment from Point to modify lesson plans and ultimately non-performance based instruction
Aug. 2012 – May 2013
None Wilbert SmithYolanda OattsBetty WoodsPaul BlakeMatthew RossCortell DavisStaffordSuttle-DavisBurroughsGumbringer
Item Analysis from Point
Increase scores on non-performance formative/summative assessments.
Focus Area: Students with disabilities Student AchievementMeasureable Goal(s): Increase in the number of students meeting on CRCT from 70% to 73% by using 2011 CRCT scores as a baseline.
School Keys Strands and Standards
Actions, Strategies, and Interventions Implementation
date/Completion date
Estimated Costs and Funding Sources, and Resources
*Primary Initiative owner/ Team members
Evaluation of Implementation of Strategies and Impact on Student Learning
Artifacts Evidence
AL2.1 Data Analysis during curriculum planning
Weekly 0 8th grade math teachers
Assessments Retakes
SBI1.5 Use ALEKS program to enhance student learning
Twice a week 0 8th grade Special Ed teacher
ALEKS program
ALEKS reports
Focus Area: Student AchievementMeasureable Goal(s): To increase the number of students performing at levels 2 and 3 on the Social Studies portion of the CRCT by 2% from 89% to 91% using the 2012 CRCT scores as the baseline.
School Keys Strands and Standards
Actions, Strategies, and Interventions
Implementation date/Completion
date
Estimated Costs and Funding Sources, and
Resources
*Primary Initiative owner/ Team
members
Evaluation of Implementation of Strategies and Impact on Student
LearningArtifacts Evidence
SBI 1.1 Implement reading strategies in theSocial Studies classrooma.) Teachers will use Vocabulary-basedinstructionb.) Instruction will include active wordwalls and vocabulary sections in studentnotebooks.
Bi-weekly from August 2012 – April 2013
None All social studies teachers
Teacher commentary,standards based bulletinboards, word walls,performance tasks.observations, tests, quizzes, rubrics, student work
Formative assessments, EOTT assessments, CRCT
Focus Area: Student AchievementMeasureable Goal(s): To increase the number of students performing at levels 2 and 3 on the Social Studies portion of the CRCT by 2% from 89% to 91% using the 2012 CRCT scores as the baseline.
School Keys Strands and Standards
Actions, Strategies, and Interventions
Implementation date/Completion
date
Estimated Costs and Funding Sources, and
Resources
*Primary Initiative owner/ Team
members
Evaluation of Implementation of Strategies and Impact on Student
LearningArtifacts Evidence
P 3.1 Increase teacher content knowledge in SocialStudies for the purpose of extending teachingstrategies and higher order thinking skills forSocial Studies instruction.
February 2013 Professional Development funds for registering to attend the Georgia Council of Economic Education workshops
All social studies teachers
BenchmarkTests,Products ofDifferentiatedInstructionalStrategies,Student WorkSamples, Pre-PostAssessmentResults, UnitAssessments,Rubrics,
Lesson Plans
There will be an increase insocial studies proficiencyscores as evidenced bybenchmarks, standardized assessments.
Focus Area: Student AchievementMeasureable Goal(s): To increase the number of students performing at levels 2 and 3 on the Social Studies portion of the CRCT by 2% from 89% to 91% using the 2012 CRCT scores as the baseline.
School Keys Strands and Standards
Actions, Strategies, and Interventions
Implementation date/Completion
date
Estimated Costs and Funding Sources, and
Resources
*Primary Initiative owner/ Team
members
Evaluation of Implementation of Strategies and Impact on Student
LearningArtifacts Evidence
Focus Area:Measureable Goal(s):
School Keys Strands and Standards
Actions, Strategies, and Interventions
Implementation date/Completion
date
Estimated Costs and Funding Sources, and
Resources
*Primary Initiative owner/ Team
members
Evaluation of Implementation of Strategies and Impact on Student LearningArtifacts Evidence
I 2.3 Weekly $200 Art supplies All social studies teachers
Lesson plans RubricsStudent products
Increase student achievement and the understanding of Standards
Focus Area: Student AchievementMeasureable Goal(s): To increase the number of students performing at levels 2 and 3 on the Social Studies portion of the CRCT by 2% from 89% to 91% using the 2012 CRCT scores as the baseline.
School Keys Strands and Standards
Actions, Strategies, and Interventions
Implementation date/Completion
date
Estimated Costs and Funding Sources, and
Resources
*Primary Initiative owner/ Team
members
Evaluation of Implementation of Strategies and Impact on Student
LearningArtifacts Evidence
Per unit None All social studies teachers
Lesson plans Student interest
surveys Student goals
Increase student awareness of their expectations and increase student passing rates on tests above 80%