26
2013 Remediation Technologies Symposium A Field Study Comparing the Insitu Treatment of PHCs Using Activated and Catalyzed Persulphate R. McGregor

A Field Study Comparing the Insitu Treatment of PHCs Using ...A Field Study Comparing the Insitu Treatment of PHCs Using Activated and Catalyzed Persulphate . R. McGregor . Background

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    8

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: A Field Study Comparing the Insitu Treatment of PHCs Using ...A Field Study Comparing the Insitu Treatment of PHCs Using Activated and Catalyzed Persulphate . R. McGregor . Background

2013 Remediation Technologies Symposium

A Field Study Comparing the Insitu Treatment of PHCs Using Activated and Catalyzed Persulphate

R. McGregor

Page 2: A Field Study Comparing the Insitu Treatment of PHCs Using ...A Field Study Comparing the Insitu Treatment of PHCs Using Activated and Catalyzed Persulphate . R. McGregor . Background

Background • Base-Activated Persulphate

– Effective oxidizer of PHCs

– Formation of free radicals, sulphate and hydroxyl

– pH > 10

– M. Miraglio (2009) showed that hydroxyl radical formation still occurred at pH < 10 but slower rates

Page 3: A Field Study Comparing the Insitu Treatment of PHCs Using ...A Field Study Comparing the Insitu Treatment of PHCs Using Activated and Catalyzed Persulphate . R. McGregor . Background

Site Overview • Hydrogeology

– Unconfined – Water Table ~2 mbgs – K 10-4 To 10-6 m/sec

• Geochemistry – Anaerobic – Sulphate Reducing

• CoCs – BTEX – F1 (C6-C10) – F2 (C>10-C16) – Total PHC ~ 30 mg/L

• Geology – Silty Sand – Interlayered – CaCO3 ~ 2 to 3 wt. % – SOD/NOD ~ 1.8 g/kg

Page 4: A Field Study Comparing the Insitu Treatment of PHCs Using ...A Field Study Comparing the Insitu Treatment of PHCs Using Activated and Catalyzed Persulphate . R. McGregor . Background

BTEX Treatment

Injection Events

Page 5: A Field Study Comparing the Insitu Treatment of PHCs Using ...A Field Study Comparing the Insitu Treatment of PHCs Using Activated and Catalyzed Persulphate . R. McGregor . Background

pH Persistence

Hours Since Injection

010

020

030

040

0

pH

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

Background pH ~6.85

Page 6: A Field Study Comparing the Insitu Treatment of PHCs Using ...A Field Study Comparing the Insitu Treatment of PHCs Using Activated and Catalyzed Persulphate . R. McGregor . Background

Purpose of Study • Initial treatment using base-activated persulphate

– Plateauing of concentrations – Maintaining high pH issue

• Study methodology – Direct comparison – Distribution evaluation – Delivery issues – Persistence evaluation – Rebound evaluation

Page 7: A Field Study Comparing the Insitu Treatment of PHCs Using ...A Field Study Comparing the Insitu Treatment of PHCs Using Activated and Catalyzed Persulphate . R. McGregor . Background

Site Overview

Tank Nest

Fill

Silty Sand

Targ

et Z

one

Page 8: A Field Study Comparing the Insitu Treatment of PHCs Using ...A Field Study Comparing the Insitu Treatment of PHCs Using Activated and Catalyzed Persulphate . R. McGregor . Background

Site Overview

Tank Nest

Fill

Silty Sand

Targ

et Z

one

CMTs

Page 9: A Field Study Comparing the Insitu Treatment of PHCs Using ...A Field Study Comparing the Insitu Treatment of PHCs Using Activated and Catalyzed Persulphate . R. McGregor . Background

Site Overview

Source API

Page 10: A Field Study Comparing the Insitu Treatment of PHCs Using ...A Field Study Comparing the Insitu Treatment of PHCs Using Activated and Catalyzed Persulphate . R. McGregor . Background

Injection Methodology • Based on Pore Volume

• > 0.5 PV • One event

• Direct Push • Geology Specific Tools • Multiple Locations • Multiple Intervals • Low Pressure

• <25 psi • Low Volume

• ~200 litres/location

Page 11: A Field Study Comparing the Insitu Treatment of PHCs Using ...A Field Study Comparing the Insitu Treatment of PHCs Using Activated and Catalyzed Persulphate . R. McGregor . Background

Monitoring Methodology • Pore Water

• 25 Cores • 24, 96 & 1,000 hours

• ~1,500 Pore Water Samples • Persulphate • pH • Catalyze

• Groundwater • 21 CMTs (3 & 7 channel)

• pH, persulphate and catalyze

• 24, 96 & 1,000 hours • CSIA

Page 12: A Field Study Comparing the Insitu Treatment of PHCs Using ...A Field Study Comparing the Insitu Treatment of PHCs Using Activated and Catalyzed Persulphate . R. McGregor . Background

Site Overview

Tank Nest

Fill

Silty Sand

Targ

et Z

one

Page 13: A Field Study Comparing the Insitu Treatment of PHCs Using ...A Field Study Comparing the Insitu Treatment of PHCs Using Activated and Catalyzed Persulphate . R. McGregor . Background

Distribution

NaOH Activated Persulphate Catalyzed Persulphate

Distribution Comparison

Page 14: A Field Study Comparing the Insitu Treatment of PHCs Using ...A Field Study Comparing the Insitu Treatment of PHCs Using Activated and Catalyzed Persulphate . R. McGregor . Background

Persistence

24 Hours 96 Hours

Catalyze Persistence - Catalyzed Persulphate

Page 15: A Field Study Comparing the Insitu Treatment of PHCs Using ...A Field Study Comparing the Insitu Treatment of PHCs Using Activated and Catalyzed Persulphate . R. McGregor . Background

Persistence

24 Hours 96 Hours

pH Persistence – Base Activated Persulfate

Page 16: A Field Study Comparing the Insitu Treatment of PHCs Using ...A Field Study Comparing the Insitu Treatment of PHCs Using Activated and Catalyzed Persulphate . R. McGregor . Background

Persistence

NaOH Activated Persulfate Catalyzed Persulphate

Page 17: A Field Study Comparing the Insitu Treatment of PHCs Using ...A Field Study Comparing the Insitu Treatment of PHCs Using Activated and Catalyzed Persulphate . R. McGregor . Background

Fill

Silty Sand Targ

et Z

one

Catalyze Persistence- Catalyzed Persulphate C/Co

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

Dep

th (

mbg

s)

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

4 hrs24 hrs 96 hrs

Page 18: A Field Study Comparing the Insitu Treatment of PHCs Using ...A Field Study Comparing the Insitu Treatment of PHCs Using Activated and Catalyzed Persulphate . R. McGregor . Background

Fill

Silty Sand

Targ

et Z

one

pH Persistence – NaOH Persulphate pH

6 8 10 12 14

Dep

th (

mbg

s)

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

4 hrs24 hrs 96 hrs

Page 19: A Field Study Comparing the Insitu Treatment of PHCs Using ...A Field Study Comparing the Insitu Treatment of PHCs Using Activated and Catalyzed Persulphate . R. McGregor . Background

19

Persistence/Distribution Observations

• Similar lateral and vertical distributions – Effective distribution over target zone – ~ 2.5 m radius of influence – ~ uniform

• Persistence of activator/catalyze varied – Catalyze present for grater than 6 weeks – pH greater than 10 for less than 3 days

Page 20: A Field Study Comparing the Insitu Treatment of PHCs Using ...A Field Study Comparing the Insitu Treatment of PHCs Using Activated and Catalyzed Persulphate . R. McGregor . Background

BTEX Treatment

Page 21: A Field Study Comparing the Insitu Treatment of PHCs Using ...A Field Study Comparing the Insitu Treatment of PHCs Using Activated and Catalyzed Persulphate . R. McGregor . Background

F2 Treatment

Page 22: A Field Study Comparing the Insitu Treatment of PHCs Using ...A Field Study Comparing the Insitu Treatment of PHCs Using Activated and Catalyzed Persulphate . R. McGregor . Background

F2 Treatment

Page 23: A Field Study Comparing the Insitu Treatment of PHCs Using ...A Field Study Comparing the Insitu Treatment of PHCs Using Activated and Catalyzed Persulphate . R. McGregor . Background

Mass Flux

NaOH Persulphate Catalyzed Persulphate

Pre Comparison Injection

1540 grams/year 1456 grams/year

Post Comparison Injection

1136 grams/year 26.2% Reduction

6.6 grams/year 99.55% Reduction

Page 24: A Field Study Comparing the Insitu Treatment of PHCs Using ...A Field Study Comparing the Insitu Treatment of PHCs Using Activated and Catalyzed Persulphate . R. McGregor . Background

CSIA

Page 25: A Field Study Comparing the Insitu Treatment of PHCs Using ...A Field Study Comparing the Insitu Treatment of PHCs Using Activated and Catalyzed Persulphate . R. McGregor . Background

25

Conclusions • NaOH-activated and catalyzed

persulfate both showed good treatment of PHCs including: – BTEX, – F1, F2 and F3 fractions

• Similar lateral and vertical distributions • Catalyzed persulphate persistence was

good • NaOH-activated persulphate had issues

with maintaining pH greater than 10

Page 26: A Field Study Comparing the Insitu Treatment of PHCs Using ...A Field Study Comparing the Insitu Treatment of PHCs Using Activated and Catalyzed Persulphate . R. McGregor . Background

26

Ending

• Questions and Thank you