Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
A global perspective on bottom fisheries in the high seas: challenges, opportunities and best practices
Merete Tandstad FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department
FISH AS FOOD
Important source of animal protein
Fish provides significant micro-nutrients, minerals, and essential fatty acids
SOCIO ECONOMIC IMPORTANCE OF FISH AND SEAFOOD
Importance of Fish as contributor to economy and employment
Fish is among the most traded food commodities worldwide.
The Ecosystem Approach to Fisheries
Widening scope of fisheries management
Fishery
Ability to Achieve
Retained
Non retained
General ecosystem
Community
National
Governance
External drivers
Ecological Wellbeing
Human Wellbeing
Bottom Fisheries in the high seas
• Not uniform and differ with respect to both main species and habitat, as well as gears used
• Estimated total catch in 2014 of less than 150 000 tonnes • 75% of High Seas bottom catches are continental-shelf and/or upper
slope. • Remaining 25% below 400 m, on various bottom structures including
seamounts
Region Main species Estimated catch 2014 (tonnes)
NE Atlantic: round nose grenadier, rough head grenadier, black scabbard fish, ling, haddock, blue ling, orange roughy, Snow crab, cod, Greenland halibut
10,941
NW Atlantic: Redfish, cod, Greenland halibut, snow crab, thorny skate, yellowtail flounder, American plaice, roughhead grenadier, witch flunder, Atlantic halibut, shrimp, haddock, white hake, anglerfish , round nose grenadier
56,407
SE Atlantic
red crab, toothfish, other bycatch 211
Indian Ocean Orange roughy, dogfish, Lethrinid emperors (Sala de Malha), Lutjanid snappers (Sala de Malha), Mora moro, traces of others
about 7,000
North Pacific: Alfonsino, armourhead, mirror dory, oreo, rockfishes, and Sablefish 5,267
South Pacific: Mostly orange roughy 1,428
Southern Oceans Antarctic toothfish, Patagonian toothfish, grenadiers 3,941
2004
2006
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
DSF PREP
UNGA 59/25
FAO DSF
GUIDE-LINES
UNGA WS 61/105 &
64/72
UNGA 61/105
UNGA 64/72
UNGA 66/68
UNGA 68/71
UNGA 69/109
UNGA 70/75
UNGA WS 64/72 &
66/68
FAO DSF Programme
IMPLEMENTATION OF GUIDANCE BY DEEP SEA RFMOs and States
VME DB Launch Busan
Changes in the Regional Bodies controlling High Seas Bottom Fishing
UNGA Aug 2016
Note: In the Central Atlantic two RFBs with advisory mandates exist. WECAFC have just started to process of becoming a management body
77% of the bottom fisheries in the ABNJ is managed by an RFMO or other multilateral body
Changes to the management of High Seas Bottom Fishing
UNGA Aug 2016
Note: SIOFA have just started the process of developing bottom fishing measures. In the interim period, management is undertaken by Contracting Parties via State measures,
VME related actions and measures
• Fished areas • VME indicators • VME thresholds • VME Encounter protocol • Exploratory fishing protocol • Impact assessments • SAIs • VME Closures • Observers • Identification guides
Assessment and management of fish stocks to provide advice on TACs, effort level, measures for bycatch, and technical measures etc
Widened scope of issues addressed in fisheries management by RFMOs
GEF-funded ABNJ Deep Seas project FAO Deep-sea Fisheries Programme
VME
Database Project (FRA)
Sust. FI - Deep-sea Project (NOR)
VME and RFMO Deep-sea Project (JPN)
ABNJ “Common Oceans”
Programme
SponGES (EU Horizon 20-20)
Executing Agencies
Deep Seas Project: partners
Funding: US$ 8 million from GEF for 5 years Co-funding estimate US$ 79 million
Nairobi Convention
Permanent Commission for the South Pacific (CPPS) North East Atlantic Fisheries
Commission (NEAFC)
Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD)
South East Atlantic Fisheries Organisation (SEAFO)
Southern Indian Ocean Deepwater Fishers Association (SIODFA)
Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization (NAFO)
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR)
South Pacific Regional Fisheries Management Organisation (SPRFMO)
General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean (GFCM) NPFC
Duke University
International Coalition of Fisheries Associations (ICFA)
Sealord Group
Partners
GRID-Arendal
Global Oceans Biodiversity Initiative (GOBI)
International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN)
Documenting progress made
• Processes and actions taken to address SAIs on VMEs are documented by RFMOs and compiled in the global VME database and in the upcoming report on VME processes and practices.
• Approach taken not always the same in each region
DSF & VMEs WECAFC Barbados, 2014
VMEs SEAFO Namibia, 2013
DSF & VMEs GFCM Italy, 2016
VMEs Indian Ocean Mauritius, 2012
VMEs NPFC Japan, 2014
DSF & VMEs CECAF 2016
Raise awareness on and exchange of experience on addressing VME related issues
ISSUES WITH IMPLEMENTATION: ENCOUNTER PROTOCOLS AND IMPACT ASSESSMENTS
• In May 2015, FAO held a combined workshop on encounter
protocols and impact assessments in the context of deepsea bottom fisheries in the ABNJ, in collaboration with IMR
• Participants: scientists, the fishing industry, managers, and NGOs contributed regional knowledge and lessons learned on the application of encounter protocols and impact assessments from their perspectives and experiences
• Outputs: 8 observations on encounter protocls and 8 on impact assessments:
Improving information and knowledge on fisheries, fisheries related instruments, and species
• Sharing information on existing instruments of relevance for deep-sea fisheries
• Exchange of experience and knowledge from scientific community
• Partnerships with industry to facilitate reporting
• Tools for improved identification and reporting of vulnerable species
• Encourage data collection and facilitate research
Future considerations
• Continue efforts to support states and RFMOs to implement the suite of measures developed
• Compile information on these fisheries and share best practice • Maintain and expand Partnerships • Continued engagement with fishing industry for improved reporting and
data collection • Support exploration of alternative methods for assessments using new
technology and methods for data limited stocks • Issues in Implementation
• Organize Busan II meeting on looking at challenges and opportunities related to the implementation of the DSF Guidelines and UNGA Resolutions
Thank you