Upload
scott-holcomb
View
19
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
A Layered Deformable Model for Gait Analysis. Haiping Lu, K.N. Plataniotis and A.N. Venetsanopoulos The Edward S. Rogers Sr. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Toronto. Outline. Motivation Overview The layered deformable model (LDM) LDM body pose recovery - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition, 2006
A Layered Deformable Model for Gait Analysis
Haiping Lu, K.N. Plataniotis and A.N. Venetsanopoulos
The Edward S. Rogers Sr.Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering
University of Toronto
FG2006, Southampton, UK 2Haiping Lu
Outline
Motivation Overview The layered deformable model (LDM) LDM body pose recovery Experimental results Conclusions
FG2006, Southampton, UK 3Haiping Lu
Motivation
Automated Human identification at a distance• Visual surveillance and monitoring applications
• Banks, parking lots, airports, etc.
USF HumanID Gait Challenge problem Articulated human body model for gait
recognition Manually labeled silhouettes
• Layered, deformable
FG2006, Southampton, UK 4Haiping Lu
Overview
Manual labeling
LDM recovery
Automatic extraction
LDM recovery
FG2006, Southampton, UK 5Haiping Lu
The Layered Deformable Model (LDM)
Trade-off:• Complexity Vs. descriptiveness
Match manual labeling: • Close to human’s subjective perception
Assumptions: • Fronto-parallel, from right to left.
FG2006, Southampton, UK 6Haiping Lu
LDM – 22 Parameters
Ten segments
Static:• Lengths (6)
• Widths (3)
Dynamic• Positions (4)
• Angles (9)
FG2006, Southampton, UK 7Haiping Lu
LDM –Layers and deformation
Four
layers
Deformation:
FG2006, Southampton, UK 8Haiping Lu
LDM – Summary
Summary: Realistic with moderate complexity
• Compact: 13 dynamic parameters
• Layered: model self-occlusion
• Deformable: realistic limbs
• Resemblance to manual labeling
FG2006, Southampton, UK 9Haiping Lu
Manual silhouettes pose estimation(ground truth & statistics)
Limb joint angles:• Reliable edge orientation
• Spatial–Orientation mean-shift (mode-seeking): dominant modes limb orientation
Others: • Joint positions, limb widths and lengths
• Simple geometry
• Torso: bounding box:
• Head: “head top” and “front face”
FG2006, Southampton, UK 10Haiping Lu
Post-processing
Human body constraints: • Parameter variation limits
• Limb angles inter-dependency
Temporal smoothing• Moving average filtering
FG2006, Southampton, UK 11Haiping Lu
Automatic pose estimation
Silhouette extraction (ICME06, Lu, et al.) Static parameters
• Coarse estimations: statistics from Gallery set
Silhouette information extraction based on ideal human proportion: • Height, head and waist center, joint spatial-
orientation domain modes of limbs
FG2006, Southampton, UK 12Haiping Lu
Ideal proportion of the human eight-head-high figure in drawing
FG2006, Southampton, UK 13Haiping Lu
Automatic pose estimation
Dynamic parameters: • Geometry on static parameters and silhouette
information, constraints.
Limb switching detection• Thighs & lower legs: variations of angles.
• Arms: opposite of thighs
• Frames between successive switch
Post-processing: smoothing
FG2006, Southampton, UK 14Haiping Lu
Experimental results
285 sequences from five data sets, one gait cycle each sequence.
Imperfection due to silhouette extraction noise and estimation algorithm
Feedback LDM recovery to silhouette extraction process may help.
FG2006, Southampton, UK 15Haiping Lu
LDM recovery results
Raw
LDM
manual
LDM
auto
FG2006, Southampton, UK 16Haiping Lu
LDM recovery example (revisit)
Manual labeling
LDM recovery
Silhouette extraction
LDM recovery
FG2006, Southampton, UK 17Haiping Lu
Angle estimation – left & right thighs
From manual silhouettes From automatically extracted silhouettes
FG2006, Southampton, UK 18Haiping Lu
Error rate (in percentage) for lower limb angles
FG2006, Southampton, UK 19Haiping Lu
Conclusions
A layered deformable model for gait analysis • 13 Dynamic and 9 static parameters
• Body pose recovery from manual (ground truth) and automatically extracted silhouettes.
Average error rate for lower limb angles: 7% Overall: close match to manual labeling,
accurate & efficient model for gait analysis Future work: model-based gait recognition
FG2006, Southampton, UK 20Haiping Lu
Acknowledgement
Thanks Prof. Sarkar from the University of South Florida (USF) for providing the manual silhouettes and Gait Challenge data sets.