Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Acknowledgements
Kathleen O’Connor Sarah Galst Wendell Khunjar
Robert Sharp Dennis Daly Joshua Perez-Terrero
Allen Deur Sal Scapelito
Kartik Chandran
26th Ward WWTP
85 mgd 3 Aeration Tanks,
1 Aeration Tank dedicated to Separate Centrate Treatment (SCT )
• Receives digested sludge from other WWTPs
• ~33% of influent load to
secondary treatment is from centrate
26th Ward utilizes nitrification and denitrification for centrate treatment
AOB
denitrita)on
1molAmmonia(NH3-N)
1molNitrite(NO2--N)
1molNitrate(NO3--N)
1molNitrite(NO2--N)
1/2molNitrogengas(N2)
75%O2
25%O2
60%Carbon
40%Carbon
nitrita)on
nitrata)ondenitrata)on
• CurrentapproachforSCTusesnitrifica)onanddentrifica)on• 4.57gO2/gNH4-N• 6gglycerinasCOD/gN
NOB
AOB
Implementing deammonification would reduce operating costs
Key requirements for commercial deammonification Anoxic conditions
Simultaneous presence of ammonia and nitrite NOB suppression
Long SRT Selective retention of anammox
1molAmmonia(NH3-N)
1/2molNitrite(NO2--N)
37.5%O2
nitrita)on
1/2molNitrogengas(N2)&SmallamountofNitrate
AOBAnammox
ANAMMOX ANITAMOX DEMON CLEARGREEN
Proprietaryreten9onstrategy Tiltedplatese>ler
Plas9ccarrierandscreen hydrocyclone SBRControl
Implications for 26th Ward and other SCT facilities
Significant retrofit of tanks and equipment
Acquisition of proprietary devices/controls
Need for seed sludge to start reactors
BUT
Significant upside in terms of operating energy and costs using anammox based technology
$-
$500,000
$1,000,000
$1,500,000
$2,000,000
$2,500,000
Yearlyestim
ated
ope
ratin
gcost
($/year)
SCTWithGlycerol Deammonification
Canweimplementsimilartechnologyinmorecosteffec)vemanner?
Glycerol addition results in nitrite accumulation
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0 30 60 90 120 150 180
Con
cent
ratio
n (m
g N
/L)
Time(min)
Nitrite
Nitrate
Ammonia
Simultaneous presence of nitrite and ammonia under anoxic conditions typically used in sidestream anammox systems
Revised approach for facilitating deammonification
1molAmmonia(NH3-N)
1/2molNitrite(NO2--N)
1/2molNitrate(NO3--N)
37.5%O2
12.5%O2 20%Carbon
nitrita)on
nitrata)on
denitrata)on
Anaerobicammoniaoxida)on 1/2molNitrogengas(N2)
&SmallamountofNitrate
• Fullnitrifica)onanddenitrata)onof50%centrate• Revisedapproachcanyieldsignificanttheore)calsavings
• 50%Oxygen• 80%Carbon
AOB
NOB
Anammox
Heterotrophic
Aerate (nite) AnammoxAnoxic(denite)
CentrateFeed
CentrateFeed
Settle Decant
Glycerol Feed
Time
0.5 Hr 24 Hr 1 Hr 0.5 Hr 16 Hr 2 Hr 1 Hr
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
0 8 9.67 23.34
Concen
tration(m
g/L)
Time(hours)
Nitrate Nitrite Ammonia
6.4 6.6 6.8 7 7.2 7.4 7.6 7.8 8 8.2
0 5
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90
0 8 9.67 23.34
pH
Con
cent
ratio
n (m
g/L)
Time (hours)
Reactor B Nitrate Nitrite Ammonia pH
anammox
aerobic
anoxic anammox
Aerobic Anoxic
Glyceroladdi9on
Proof of Concept
Anammox
Centrateaddi9on
Centrateaddi9on
Pilot setup
Centrate Pump Storage
tank SBR
Glycerol dosing pump
Inclined plate settler
Effluent to main plant
DOprobeandmeter
pHprobeandmeter
Aircompressor,airflowmeter;airflowcontroller/spliZer
To plant drain (manual) To plant drain
(manual)
Mixerandimpeller
Reactor feed pump
Return sludge pump (manual)
TempandTSSprobeandmeter
Finebubblediffusers
Pilot setup
EffluentfromplateseZlergoestodrain
Underflowispipedtoreturnsludgetothereactor
Reactor
SeZler
Basis of Operation
0
CycleTime(hr)
24 48
CentrateFeed
AerobicPhase AnammoxPhase
Glycerolfeed
Denitrata)onPhase
• Duringenrichment,noglycerolfeed• Aerobicphasevariesfrom8to24hrs• Deammonifica)onphasevariesfrom24to42hrs
Operational parameters
Key Parameters • HRT = 48 hr (matches full-scale HRT) • SRT > 50 day
• Target TIN loading ~ 0.25 kg N/m3-day
Process control strategy • Grab samples 5 days a week (NH3, NO2, NO3, ortho-P, alkalinity) • Weekly activity tests
• Adjust airflow in response to grab samples • DO monitored; not used for control
• Adjust loading in response to activity tests
• pH monitored
Approach for Enrichment of Anammox
Manipulate N Loading Rate to
Reactor
Weekly Anammox Activity Batch testing
Maximumpoten)alanammoxac)vity
MonitorEffluentQuality
TargetLoadingNloading=0.25kgN/m3-day
Overall progress
TINLoadingRate(KgN/m
3-day)
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
1/5/20
15
1/25
/201
5
2/14
/201
5
3/6/20
15
3/26
/201
5
4/15
/201
5
5/5/20
15
5/25
/201
5
6/14
/201
5
7/4/20
15
7/24
/201
5
8/13
/201
5
9/2/20
15
9/22
/201
5
10/12/20
15
11/1/201
5
11/21/20
15
TINPercentRem
oval(%
)TIN%Removal TINLoadingRate
Period 1 Period 2 Period 3 SS
Nitrogen Removal Performance
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
5/25
/201
5
6/14
/201
5
7/4/20
15
7/24
/201
5
8/13
/201
5
9/2/20
15
9/22
/201
5
10/12/20
15
11/1/201
5
11/21/20
15
TINPercentRem
oval(%
)TIN%Removal TINLoadingRate
Period 3 SS
Avg. Loading = 0.2 kg N/m3-day Avg. TIN Removal = 63%
Nitrogen removal profile
TIN removal occurring during the aerobic period… Looking into:
• Heterotrophic denitrification • Nitrous oxide production • Anammox (granule)
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48
Nitrogen
Con
centratio
n(m
gN/L)
CycleTime(hours)
NH3 TIN NOx
Aerobic Cycle Anoxic Cycle
Nitrous Oxide Production
Results indicate that nitrogen oxide production is present and can account for ~3% of the total ammonia removed from the system
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
12:00PM
6:00
PM
12:00AM
6:00AM
12:00PM
6:00
PM
12:00AM
6:00AM
12:00PM
Gaseou
sN2O
(ppm
v)
Time(hr)
NitrousOxide NitricOxide
Gaseuo
usNO(p
pbv)
Aerobic Cycle Anoxic Cycle
Aerobic Cycle
Nitrite production is significant N loss occurs in aerobic cycle
Free ammonia to MLSS = 1.8 mg Free ammonia as N/g MLSS
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
NO3Produced NO2Produced MLSS+N2O+N2
%ofN
H3Re
moved
inAerob
ic
Cycle
FA/MLSS
0
1
2
3
4
55/26
/2015
6/25/201
5
7/25/201
5
8/24/201
5
9/23/201
5
10/23/2015
11/22/20
15
Ratio
Date
FA/MLSS
Anoxic Cycle
Nitrogen removal driven by combination of anammox and denitrification
y=1.1918x
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Nitrite
Con
sumed
(mgN/L)
AmmoniaConsumed(mgN/L)
Strous et al. 1998
Lessons Learned • Rapid heat loss suppresses anammox activity
• High operating DO (~2 mg/L) during enrichment speculated to suppress anammox activity
• Anammox can occur in low DO environments, increasing the overall nitrogen removal efficiency of the SCAD Process
• NOB repression is present – Although not desired, high free ammonia loading and strict airflow control resulted in NOB repression.
• Glycerol addition may benefit the process, however, is not required to achieve high removal rates
Conceptual strategy for promoting anammox growth in SCT
A
B
D
RASfrommainplant
InclinedplatesettlerunderflowcontainingAnammox bacteria
InternalRecycle
Centrate
C
SCADeffluenttomainplant
Inclinedplatesettleroverflowtomainplant
GlyceroladditionAerobiczone-Nitrification
Anoxic-Denitratation
DeammonificationAnoxic-Denitritation
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.301/1/20
15
1/31/2015
3/2/20
15
4/1/20
15
5/1/20
15
5/31/2015
6/30/2015
7/30/2015
TINPercentRem
oval
(%)
TNLoa
ding
Rate
(kgN/m
3-day)
TNLoadingRate TIN%Removal
Concluding thoughts
Despite issues with centrate supply and power, system recovers quickly
Questions and Contact Information
Wendell Khunjar [email protected] Sarah Galst [email protected] Gregory Pace [email protected]