Upload
aditya-chaudhary
View
215
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/29/2019 A n D of Lokpal
1/2
Advantage of Lokpal Bill
Major advantage of this bill is all about solving the No.1 problem of India is
CORRUPTION.
Who will be the decision makers this time, nonpoliticians, non-bureaucrats,
not a police officer.
This bill is proposed to the government again and again in last 50 years so
this holds the believe of generations and we all think this can change the
system.
The decision will be faster than what we have right now, the proposed
decision will be 1 year and punishment will be executed in 2 years.
People will not have to go through the grueling system to complain the crime.
Major Disadvantages of Lokpal Bill
This is not a mature bill, still lot many open issues, I will write them all here
before I write about the possible fix for it. I could be an ignorant about the
complete bill but I tried to read it from various places and I didnt notice
anyone describing these issues.
Huge burden on government to run this, it needs huge money to manage the
head counts.
I dont understand why it needs 1 year for decision and another 1 year for thepunishment.
How someone can guarantee there will be No minister or bureaucrat
influence on their investigations.
How can it be assured that Lokpal members are not corrupted? Dont we
have corrupted judges, citizens and constitutional authorities, who says
only the politicians are corrupted?
I believe we are responsible for the corrupted system and we should be the
one to fix it, government will have to support us as we support thegovernment. Here are my thoughts.
How can we reduce the monetary burden on government and solve the
problem? We dont need to hire the 100% decision makers, we can hire only
administrative people to manage the system and the decision makers will be
the regular citizens. We all solve some issues on daily basis and we dont
7/29/2019 A n D of Lokpal
2/2
need to be qualified to solve them. There are more than 70% issues in India
that dont need be investigated at all. Lets say I applied for a passport
renewal and the department lost it, there are 3-4 people responsible for
handling the passport and everyone should be punished equally. Let them all
pay Rs 10,000 each and find out who the real culprit internally. This way I get
some compensation for losing the passport and the office work as a grouprather than an individual. It is a common problem in India that the staffs think
them to be individual than a group and they make you run from one to other
for a small task. To make these kind of simple decisions we dont need
fulltime and highly qualified people. Who will be member for this case will be
auto selected and everyone will be paid something to show up at the decided
place. People who are not going to show up will end up in paying huge
amount so that it becomes everyones responsibility to participate, there can
be some excuses for emergency reasons.
We dont need 1 year to solve a case now, major part of the complains can be
solved in 3 months and punished in 2-6 months if we make everyone to come
and participate. Now the government will have at least 60 billion staff to
handle the cases.
People participating in the cases will be informed at the site on the details so
there is no upfront information available or relation build before the D day.
There cant be any influence as no one gets time, influence will come in when
we give time to the case and people on the case are known.
How can a Lokpal member be corrupted now? Person doesnt know anything,
goes to solve a problem and takes a decision on the spot.
For the case that needs to be investigated properly needs some fulltime
employees as the decision makers. Give an opportunity to people above the
age of 50 to retire from their regular job and join the department. They have
50 years of track record to prove if they are uncorrupted or not, this head
count can be 50%. Other 50% can be fresh candidates from various ages.
Every case should involve audience, if a person is not satisfied with the
decision then he can take an audience poll for reapply. If audience support
him to file again then he is not charged to re-file else he is going to pay good
amount for reconsideration. Failing 3 times will lock him to the punishment
and cant apply for reconsideration to any of his cases for next 5 years.
There can be many things added to this bill to make it incorruptible. If we are
just trying to shift from one corrupt system to another then there is no point
in passing this. Making this bill a best one is the job of the government and
we all have to participate and make it work from approval to execution. Do
you agree with me, let me know here, I am open to any kind debate.