1
A Phase 1 Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind, Single Ascending Dose Safety and Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Study in Healthy Adult Males after LIQ865 Injection Vaughn TA 1 , Kjær Jensen E 2 , Bøgevig S 3 , Springborg AD 2 , Werner MU 2 1 Liquidia Technologies, Raleigh, NC, USA; 2 Multidisciplinary Pain Center, Neuroscience Center, Copenhagen University Hospitals, DENMARK; 3 Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Copenhagen University Hospitals, DENMARK Introduction: An exploratory ascending dose safety study was conducted at a Phase 1 facility in Copenhagen, DENMARK, under DKMA/IEC approval to assess the tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of LIQ865A and LIQ865B, two free-base bupivacaine formulations designed to produce a long-acting local anesthetic relief for 3 to 5 days after injection. Both formulations are made using PRINT® (Particle Replication In Non-wetting Templates) Technology, a proprietary particle engineering technology that allows precise control over particle features such as size, shape, and chemical composition. Methods: Ascending bupivacaine doses from 150 mg to 600 mg were injected subcutaneously in the medial calf using a fixed volume of 10 mL with 6 passes (3/opposite corner) within a rectangular test area using a 21G 2” needle (FIG. 1). Each subject received randomized either injectable suspension of bupivacaine/poly(D,L-lactic-co-glycolic acid) [PLGA] PRINT® particles (LIQ865A) or bupivacaine free base PRINT® particles (LIQ865B), in one test area, and diluent alone in the contralateral test area. Up to six subjects were enrolled in each cohort with dose escalation occurring after evaluating safety. Pharmacokinetics were analyzed by measurements of plasma concentrations of bupivacaine at 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12 and 24 hours, and on days (D) 2, 3, 4, and 5. Pharmacodynamics were analyzed by Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) assessing mechanical and thermal sensitivity in the injection test areas. Mechanical Detection Threshold (MDT) and Mechanical Pain Threshold (MPT) were assessed using calibrated polyamide monofilaments (Stoelting-Europe) and pin-prick stimulators (MRC Systems), respectively. Warmth Detection Threshold (WDT), Cool Detection Threshold (CDT), Heat Pain Threshold (HPT) and perception of a SupraThreshold Heat Stimulus (STHS; 47°C, 5 s) were assessed with a computerized thermode (active surface: 2.5 x 5.0 cm 2 ; MSA, Somedic AB). Pharmacodynamic evaluations in the test sites were performed by blinded examiners and completed over 5 days (testing at 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24h, and once daily on D2 – D5. Values were compared to baseline and to the contralateral control leg. Safety/Tolerability: Overall, administration of LIQ865A (n = 16) and LIQ865B (n = 12) were generally well-tolerated at all dose levels in the study. Most AEs were local at the sites of injection mainly resulting from the extensive needling procedure (FIG. 1). Bruising at the injection site occurred in all treatment/dosing groups regardless of whether the leg was the active or control diluent side. Slightly more bruising was noted in the leg site that received LIQ865 compared to the control site. There were 5 cases of subcutaneous induration at the injection site, LIQ865A (n = 4) and LIQ865B (n = 1), with 4 mild and 1 moderate in the 450 mg dose groups and none in any of the other groups. The induration was transient and resolved by 30 to 60 days except for one subject who reported resolution just past the 60-day point. Conclusions: These preliminary QST results indicate a duration of hypoesthesia and hypoalgesia up to 3-5 days, depending upon stimulation modality, particularly at doses of 300 mg and higher. These results warrant additional studies to examine the clinical utility and safety of LIQ865 when injected into the surgical site to produce long lasting postoperative analgesia. Pharmacokinetics: Mean (SE) dose-dependent PK-profiles from 0-120h are illustrated in FIG. 2. The highest individual plasma bupivacaine concentration (C max ) obtained was 728 ng/mL. Bupivacaine clearance in both formulations exhibited “flip-flop” kinetics where the rate of clearance was driven by the rate of drug absorption from the extended release formulation. Pharmacodynamics: QST-testing demonstrated an onset of action at the 1h time point for all stimulation modalities and dose levels of both formulations. Hypoesthesia and hypoalgesia were demonstrated for all mechanical and thermal stimulation modalities, and maintained through 72h - 120h for bupivacaine doses greater >225 mg compared to the controls (diluent alone). Mean dose-dependent PD-profiles from 0-120h for Mechanical Thresholds (MDT) and Thermal Thresholds (CDT) are illustrated in FIG. 3 compared to controls (diluent). FIG. 1. The injection site on the medial calf. Three passes with the needle (indicated by dashed arrows) were made in each of two opposite corners. The injectate was evenly distributed in the red rectangle representing the sensory testing area (2.5 x 5.0 cm 2 ). 0 10 1000 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Plasma Bupivacaine Conc. (ng/mL) Time (hrs) Plasma PK, LIQ865A 150 mg (n=3) 225 mg (n=3) 300 mg (n=3) 450 mg (n=6) 600 mg (n=1) 0 10 1000 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Plasma Bupivacaine Conc. (ng/mL) Time (hrs) Plasma PK, LIQ865B 150 mg (n=3) 225 mg (n=3) 300 mg (n=3) 450 mg (n=3) 5 10 15 20 25 30 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Mean CDT ( o C) Time (hrs) CDT, LIQ865A 150 mg, Active 150 mg, Placebo 225 mg, Active 225 mg, Placebo 300 mg, Active 300 mg, Placebo 450 mg, Active 450 mg, Placebo 600 mg, Active 600 mg, Placebo 5 10 15 20 25 30 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Mean CDT ( o C) Time (hrs) CDT, LIQ865B 150 mg, Active 150 mg, Placebo 225 mg, Active 225 mg, Placebo 300 mg, Active 300 mg, Placebo 450 mg, Active 450 mg, Placebo 3 4 5 6 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Median MDT (log weight units) Time (hrs) MDT, LIQ865B 150 mg, Active 150 mg, Placebo 225 mg, Active 225 mg, Placebo 300 mg, Active 300 mg, Placebo 450 mg, Active 450 mg, Placebo 3 4 5 6 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Median MDT (log weight units) Time (hrs) MDT, LIQ865A 150 mg, Active 150 mg, Placebo 225 mg, Active 225 mg, Placebo 300 mg, Active 300 mg, Placebo 450 mg, Active 450 mg, Placebo 600 mg, Active 600 mg, Placebo FIG. 2. Pharmacokinetic profiles of LIQ865A and LIQ865B from 0-120 h. FIG. 3. Cool Detection Threshold (CDT) profiles and Mechanical Detection Threshold (MDT) profiles for LIQ865A and LIQ865B from 0-120 h, compared to controls.

A Phase 1 Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind, …...2018/10/25  · comparedto the controls (diluent alone). Mean dose-dependent PD-profiles from 0-120h for Mechanical Thresholds

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: A Phase 1 Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind, …...2018/10/25  · comparedto the controls (diluent alone). Mean dose-dependent PD-profiles from 0-120h for Mechanical Thresholds

A Phase 1 Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind, Single Ascending Dose Safety and Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Study in Healthy Adult Males after LIQ865 Injection

Vaughn TA1, Kjær Jensen E2, Bøgevig S3, Springborg AD2, Werner MU2

1Liquidia Technologies, Raleigh, NC, USA; 2Multidisciplinary Pain Center, Neuroscience Center, Copenhagen University Hospitals, DENMARK; 3Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Copenhagen University Hospitals, DENMARK

Introduction: An exploratory ascending dose safety study wasconducted at a Phase 1 facility in Copenhagen, DENMARK, underDKMA/IEC approval to assess the tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK) andpharmacodynamics (PD) of LIQ865A and LIQ865B, two free-basebupivacaine formulations designed to produce a long-acting localanesthetic relief for 3 to 5 days after injection. Both formulations aremade using PRINT® (Particle Replication In Non-wetting Templates)Technology, a proprietary particle engineering technology that allowsprecise control over particle features such as size, shape, and chemicalcomposition.

Methods: Ascending bupivacaine doses from 150 mg to 600 mg wereinjected subcutaneously in the medial calf using a fixed volume of 10 mLwith 6 passes (3/opposite corner) within a rectangular test area using a21G 2” needle (FIG. 1). Each subject received randomized eitherinjectable suspension of bupivacaine/poly(D,L-lactic-co-glycolic acid)[PLGA] PRINT® particles (LIQ865A) or bupivacaine free base PRINT®particles (LIQ865B), in one test area, and diluent alone in thecontralateral test area. Up to six subjects were enrolled in each cohortwith dose escalation occurring after evaluating safety. Pharmacokineticswere analyzed by measurements of plasma concentrations ofbupivacaine at 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12 and 24 hours,and on days (D) 2, 3, 4, and 5. Pharmacodynamics were analyzed byQuantitative Sensory Testing (QST) assessing mechanical and thermalsensitivity in the injection test areas. Mechanical Detection Threshold(MDT) and Mechanical Pain Threshold (MPT) were assessed usingcalibrated polyamide monofilaments (Stoelting-Europe) and pin-prickstimulators (MRC Systems), respectively. Warmth Detection Threshold(WDT), Cool Detection Threshold (CDT), Heat Pain Threshold (HPT) andperception of a SupraThreshold Heat Stimulus (STHS; 47°C, 5 s) wereassessed with a computerized thermode (active surface: 2.5 x 5.0 cm2;MSA, Somedic AB). Pharmacodynamic evaluations in the test sites wereperformed by blinded examiners and completed over 5 days (testing at1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24h, and once daily on D2 – D5. Values werecompared to baseline and to the contralateral control leg.

Safety/Tolerability: Overall, administration of LIQ865A (n = 16) and LIQ865B (n = 12) were generally well-tolerated at all dose levels in the study. Most AEs were local at the sites of injection mainly resulting from the extensive needling procedure (FIG. 1). Bruising at the injection site occurred in all treatment/dosing groups regardless of whether the leg was the active or control diluent side. Slightly more bruising was noted in the leg site that received LIQ865 compared to the control site. There were 5 cases of subcutaneous induration at the injection site, LIQ865A (n = 4) and LIQ865B (n = 1), with 4 mild and 1 moderate in the 450 mg dose groups and none in any of the other groups. The induration was transient and resolved by 30 to 60 days except for one subject who reported resolution just past the 60-day point.

Conclusions: These preliminary QST results indicate a duration of hypoesthesia and hypoalgesia up to 3-5 days, depending upon stimulation modality, particularly atdoses of 300 mg and higher. These results warrant additional studies to examine the clinical utility and safety of LIQ865 when injected into the surgical site to producelong lasting postoperative analgesia.

Pharmacokinetics: Mean (SE) dose-dependent PK-profilesfrom 0-120h are illustrated in FIG. 2. The highestindividual plasma bupivacaine concentration (Cmax)obtained was 728 ng/mL. Bupivacaine clearance in bothformulations exhibited “flip-flop” kinetics where the rateof clearance was driven by the rate of drug absorptionfrom the extended release formulation.

Pharmacodynamics: QST-testing demonstrated an onset of action at the 1h time point for all stimulation modalitiesand dose levels of both formulations. Hypoesthesia and hypoalgesia were demonstrated for all mechanical andthermal stimulation modalities, and maintained through 72h - 120h for bupivacaine doses greater >225 mgcompared to the controls (diluent alone). Mean dose-dependent PD-profiles from 0-120h for Mechanical Thresholds(MDT) and Thermal Thresholds (CDT) are illustrated in FIG. 3 compared to controls (diluent).

FIG. 1. The injection site on the medial calf. Three passes with the needle(indicated by dashed arrows) were made in each of two opposite corners. Theinjectate was evenly distributed in the red rectangle representing the sensorytesting area (2.5 x 5.0 cm2).

0

10

1000

0 20 40 60 80 100 120

Plas

ma

Bupi

vaca

ine

Con

c.

(ng/

mL)

Time (hrs)

Plasma PK, LIQ865A

150 mg (n=3)225 mg (n=3)300 mg (n=3)450 mg (n=6)600 mg (n=1)

0

10

1000

0 20 40 60 80 100 120

Plas

ma

Bupi

vaca

ine

Con

c.

(ng/

mL)

Time (hrs)

Plasma PK, LIQ865B

150 mg (n=3)225 mg (n=3)300 mg (n=3)450 mg (n=3)

5

10

15

20

25

30

0 20 40 60 80 100 120

Mea

n CD

T (o C

)

Time (hrs)

CDT, LIQ865A

150 mg, Active150 mg, Placebo225 mg, Active225 mg, Placebo300 mg, Active300 mg, Placebo450 mg, Active450 mg, Placebo600 mg, Active600 mg, Placebo

5

10

15

20

25

30

0 20 40 60 80 100 120

Mea

n CD

T (o C

)

Time (hrs)

CDT, LIQ865B

150 mg, Active150 mg, Placebo225 mg, Active225 mg, Placebo300 mg, Active300 mg, Placebo450 mg, Active450 mg, Placebo

3

4

5

6

0 20 40 60 80 100 120

Med

ian

MDT

(log

wei

ght u

nits

)

Time (hrs)

MDT, LIQ865B150 mg, Active150 mg, Placebo225 mg, Active225 mg, Placebo300 mg, Active300 mg, Placebo450 mg, Active450 mg, Placebo

3

4

5

6

0 20 40 60 80 100 120

Med

ian

MDT

(log

wei

ght u

nits

)

Time (hrs)

MDT, LIQ865A 150 mg, Active150 mg, Placebo225 mg, Active225 mg, Placebo300 mg, Active300 mg, Placebo450 mg, Active450 mg, Placebo600 mg, Active600 mg, Placebo

FIG. 2. Pharmacokinetic profiles of LIQ865A andLIQ865B from 0-120 h.

FIG. 3. Cool Detection Threshold (CDT) profiles and Mechanical Detection Threshold (MDT) profiles forLIQ865A and LIQ865B from 0-120 h, compared to controls.