The Inspector General Report of Investigation (ROI): (1 of 2)
1.Provides a stand-alone document with all necessary administrative
data and evidentiary data (exhibits) that explains in plain English
the allegation(s) under investigation 2.Lists all the people
involved 3.Explains the methodology of fact-finding used to
determine the credible evidence in support of substantiation and
the credible evidence in support of not substantiation
Slide 9
The Inspector General Report of Investigation (ROI): (2 of 2)
4.Provides an objective analysis of these facts in relation to the
elements of proof listed in the valid standard allegedly violated
5.Presents findings based on these facts and, if necessary, lists
other matters that the Directing Authority must address 6.Makes a
clear recommendation regarding the findings listed in the report
7.Makes actionable recommendations to resolve each of the issues
identified during the investigation
Slide 10
Investigations
Slide 11
IG Investigations U.S. Army Inspector General School 11 Linked
IG Functions TEACHING AND TRAINING INSPECTIONS
ASSISTANCEINVESTIGATIONS
Slide 12
IG Investigations U.S. Army Inspector General School 12 IG
Investigators Purpose? BLUF: Resolve Allegations of Impropriety
Unwavering commitment to standards One investigatory option Protect
the best interests of the Army Focus on Army values IGs work for
the Commander! Do not seek out allegations
Slide 13
IG Investigations U.S. Army Inspector General School 13 IGs are
fair and impartial fact-finders We call the balls and the strikes!
Through a dogged pursuit of the truth! The A&I Guide, Part Two,
Section 2-6 (II-2-15)
Slide 14
IG Investigations U.S. Army Inspector General School 14
Investigations Overview Introduction / DEFINITIONS IGAP Step 1 IGAP
Step 2 / 3 Gather the Facts Step 4 Analyze the Evidence Write the
report: ROI / ROII Make Notifications Step 5 Closure & Release
~Step 6 / 7 Review / Quiz / HW / Final
Slide 15
IG Investigations Day 7 (Tuesday) 0900-1200 Intro; definitions;
IGAP 1 & 2 1300-1600 IGPA; form allegations; Action Memo &
Directive; Plan; IGAP 3-4; PE's 1-7 Day 8 (Wednesday) 0800-1100
Gather & analyze evidence; 4-Part Interview; IGAP 4; PE's 7-10
1100-1230 Witness telephone interview prep 1330-1415 Live Witness
telephone interview; PE 10 1420-1450 Command Products; Force-Field
Diagram 1500-1630 Suspect interview prep; PE 11 U.S. Army Inspector
General School 15 Investigations Training Schedule
Slide 16
IG Investigations Day 9 (Thursday) 0800-0900 Live Suspect
interview & AAR; PE 11 0900-1000 Graded Homework PE 12;
introduce ROI 1000-1100 Writing an ROI; final notifications;
follow-up; close IGAR; finish IGAP 4; IGAP 5-7 1600-1630 (Optional
ELO review) Day 10 (Friday) 0800-0900 INVESTIGATIONS QUIZ &
Post-Quiz review 0900-1100 Whistleblower Reprisal investigations
Day 11 (Monday) 0800 INVESTIGATIONS HOMEWORK DUE U.S. Army
Inspector General School 16 Investigations Training Schedule
Slide 17
IG Investigations U.S. Army Inspector General School 17
References AR 20-1, IG Activities and Procedures Chapters 3 and 7,
Appendix D, and the Glossary The Assistance and Investigations
Guide Part Two & Part Three (and some of Part One) Advance
Sheets & Class CD Please have these resources available every
class!
Slide 18
IG Investigations U.S. Army Inspector General School 18
Investigations Terminal Learning Objective Action: Resolve
allegations of impropriety. Conditions: Given Army Regulation 20-1,
The Assistance and Investigations Guide, Army Regulation 600-20,
DoD Directive 5500.7-R, classroom handouts, classroom instruction,
and allegations of impropriety. Standard: Apply the seven-step
Inspector General Action Process (IGAP) to resolve an allegation of
impropriety, culminating in a Report of Investigation (ROI) that
accurately substantiates or does not substantiate the allegation.
In addition, describe special situations with regard to Inspector
General Investigations.
Slide 19
IG Investigations U.S. Army Inspector General School 19
Enabling Learning Objectives Advance Sheets pages 13 - 15
1.Describe a persons role and status in an IG Investigation /
Investigative Inquiry. 2.Describe an individuals rights or
non-rights given that persons role and status. 3.Describe a fact
and the levels of evidence used in the Investigations function.
4.Describe the IG Standard of proof. 5.Describe the parts of an
allegation. ELOs
Slide 20
IG Investigations U.S. Army Inspector General School 20
Enabling Learning Objectives 6. Identify the allegations and issues
in a complaint. 7. Describe the actions an IG should take upon
receiving an allegation against a senior official. 8. Determine if
an allegation received by the IG is appropriate for IG action. 9.
Describe an IG Investigation and an IG Investigative Inquiry and
the differences between them. ELOs
Slide 21
IG Investigations U.S. Army Inspector General School 21
Enabling Learning Objectives 10. Explain which IG method
Investigative Inquiry or Investigation is preferable for a
particular case. 11. Describe how an IG plans an Investigative
Inquiry or Investigation. 12. Demonstrate evidence-gathering
activities by reviewing documents; analyzing data; and interviewing
witnesses, subjects, or suspects. ELOs
Slide 22
IG Investigations U.S. Army Inspector General School 22
Enabling Learning Objectives 13. Describe how IGs use command
products to resolve an allegation in a ROI / ROII. 14. Complete a
Report of Investigation (ROI). 15. Describe a request for IG
information and the proper actions taken by the IG. ELOs
Slide 23
IG Investigations U.S. Army Inspector General School 23 Setting
Conditions for Success Stay current with the reading - AR 20-1,
Chapters 1 through 4, and 8 Refer to the A & I Guide - Part Two
Follow along with the Advance Sheets Participate Immerse yourself
in the PE
Slide 24
IG Investigations U.S. Army Inspector General School 24 Role:
Witness, Subject, Suspect Status: Military, DA Civilian, Contract
Civilian, or Civilian-Civilian Complainant: Anonymous, Injured
Party, Third Party Subject / Suspect: Unit? Status? At the times in
question Commander / Supervisor ROI: Report of Investigation ROII:
Report of Investigative Inquiry Person's Role and Status
DEFINITIONS AR 20-1, paragraph 7-1g; The A&I Guide, Part Two,
Section 1-3 (II-1-9) ELO 1
Slide 25
IG Investigations U.S. Army Inspector General School 25 Roles
DEFINITIONS Witness : Someone whom we believe has some knowledge to
support or to refute an allegation May be a subject-matter expert
(SME) Subject: Someone against whom a non-criminal allegation is
made Suspect: Someone against whom a criminal * allegation is made
*Violations of law (UCMJ & USC) are criminal offences. AR 20-1,
paragraph 7-1g; The A&I Guide, Part Two, Section 1-3
(II-1-9)
Slide 26
IG Investigations Military? Army Active Duty? Army Reserve?
Army National Guard? Department of the Army Civilians? Contractors?
Other DoD Military / Civilian Personnel? Civilians not employed by
the DoD? (Civilian / Civilians) U.S. Army Inspector General School
26 The A&I Guide, Part Two, Section 1-6 (II-1-17) Always Who is
required to cooperate & when? When in a duty status Always
Chain of command It depends on the contract Never Status
DEFINITIONS
Slide 27
IG Investigations U.S. Army Inspector General School 27 Rights
and Non-Rights AR 20-1, paragraph 7-1g; The A&I Guide, Part
Two, Sections 1-4 and 1-5 ADMINISTRATIVE DUE PROCESS Inspector
General Investigation / Investigative Inquiry WITNESS SUBJECT
SUSPECT ELO 2
Slide 28
IG Investigations U.S. Army Inspector General School 28 WITNESS
1. Consult with Counsel (but...) 2. Confidentiality (but...) 3.
Review Own Testimony (in...) 4. Avoid Self Incrimination 5. Have a
Union Rep present (if...) Rights Based on Role DEFINITIONS AR 20-1,
paragraph 7-1g; The A&I Guide, Part Two, Section 1-4 (II-1-11)
SUSPECT Subject and Witness rights...AND! Have Article 31 Rights:
8. Have Counsel Present 9. Remain Silent SUBJECT Witness
rights...and! 6. Know and Comment on Allegations 7. Know and
Comment on Unfavorable Information
Slide 29
IG Investigations U.S. Army Inspector General School 29 Know
the identity of witnesses Be present during questioning of others
Question others Review evidence Audio / video record testimony [AR
20-1, 7-1.b(4)(f)] Take / Remove written notes from IG interview*
Have a friend present during questioning* * Detailed IG / CIG has
some discretion Non-Rights DEFINITIONS AR 20-1, Paragraphs 3-1 and
3-2; The A&I Guide, Part Two, Section 1-5 (II-1-15) IG
confidentiality
Slide 30
IG Investigations U.S. Army Inspector General School 30 Summary
Define the following terms: Witness Subject Suspect What are the
rights of each during an IG Investigative Inquiry or Investigation?
When must a DA civilian employee cooperate with an IG Investigative
Inquiry or Investigation? When must a civilian-civilian cooperate
with an IG? What do you do when a witness incriminates
themselves?
Slide 31
IG Investigations U.S. Army Inspector General School 31
Categories of Evidence DEFINITIONS Testimony Recorded under oath -
transcribed or summarized! ( Sworn Statement ) Physical Objects;
not common Documents Statements - Written Standard Regulation, SOP,
etc IG Personal Observation Stay Away! High Low The A&I Guide,
Part Two, Section 1-8 (II-1-22) RRecorded Under oath
Slide 32
IG Investigations U.S. Army Inspector General School 32 Levels
of Evidence DEFINITIONS Direct - First-hand knowledge
Circumstantial - Tends to prove or disprove an issue by inference
Hearsay - What one individual says another person said Opinion - A
persons belief or judgment High Low ELO 3 Evidence is also
characterized by its quality, detail, and credibility. Always
conduct a credibility assessment. The A&I Guide, Part Two,
Section 1-9 (II-1-26) (D C H O)
Slide 33
IG Investigations Events that are known to have happened Things
that are known to be true Can be a combination of testimonies,
documents or physical evidence Must independently agree on a single
point U.S. Army Inspector General School 33 Fact DEFINITIONS The
A&I Guide, Part Two, Section 1-10 (II-1-27)
Slide 34
IG Investigations U.S. Army Inspector General School 34 IG
Standard of Proof DEFINITION Preponderance of credible evidence
That evidence which has superiority of weight >50% "More likely
than not, it probably occurred" Only two conclusions: S
ubstantiated N ot Substantiated AR 20-1, paragraph 7-1a ELO 4
Slide 35
IG Investigations U.S. Army Inspector General School 35 4-Part
Allegation DEFINITION Who Must be an individual; name Improperly
The word improperly shows wrongdoing may be implied Did (or failed
to do) In Violation of a Standard A standard is law, regulation, or
policy AR 20-1, Glossary; The A&I Guide, Part Two, Section 2-2
(II-2-3) ELO 5
Slide 36
IG Investigations IGARs come from the in crowd: Walk-in Call-in
Write-in E-mail-in FAX-in gym / party / PX / bathroom / mall Bottom
line who can give an IGAR? U.S. Army Inspector General School 36
The Seven-Step IGAP Step One AR 20-1, paragraph 6-1d (1) and
7-1b(1) The A&I Guide, Part Two, Sect. 1-14 (II-1-32) Step 1
Receive the IGAR ELO 3
Slide 37
IG Investigations U.S. Army Inspector General School 37
Allegations against COL(P), GO, or USMA Academy Professor Senior
Executive Service (SES) civilian Report to DAIG Investigations
Division within 2 working days DO NOT conduct ANY IG Preliminary
Analysis Verify with Investigations Division before entering in
IGARS as an Information IGAR Do not name the senior official Do not
complete a DA Form 1559 Not Local IG Appropriate Senior Official
Allegations AR 20-1, paragraph 7-1l, Appendix D-1; The A&I
Guide, Part Two, Section 2-4 (II-2-9) ELO 7
Slide 38
IG Investigations U.S. Army Inspector General School 38 Step
Two: IG Preliminary Analysis Step 2 Preliminary Analysis Identify
Issues / Allegations Determine IG Appropriateness Open Case in
IGARS Acknowledge Receipt Select a Course of Action (Obtain
Authority) AR 20-1, Paragraph 6-1d and 7-1b The A&I Guide, Part
One, Section 2-3 (II-2-7) IGPA
Slide 39
IG Investigations U.S. Army Inspector General School 39
ANONYMOUS COMPLAINANT ISSUE INJURED PARTY THIRD PARTY Wrongdoing
without a "WHO" or a standard - or something bothering the
complainant COMPLAINT ALLEGATION "WHO"
Slide 40
IG Investigations U.S. Army Inspector General School 40 A
thought process to determine how best to proceed. May take minutes
/ hours / days Sub-Steps of Preliminary Analysis Identify the
issues and determine allegations Determine IG appropriateness Open
the case in IGARS Acknowledge receipt Select COA AR 20-1, para.
6-1d (2); The A&I Guide, Part Two, Chapter 2 (II-2-1) Let's
look at a complaint! STEP 2: Conduct IG Preliminary Analysis (IGPA)
ELO 6
Slide 41
IG Investigations Typical Complaint U.S. Army Inspector General
School 41 Our director, COL Brown, is a real JERK. He has a clique
of cronies that get all the good deals. The rest of us don t get
anything. He also ordered new office furniture for himself and his
SECRETARY. That is a real waste since we are laying off good
workers. I also heard that he accepted a unit gift at his change of
command that cost over $300. He boasts that he is IN TIGHT with the
General and that is why he can do whatever he wants to do. If you
check, you can verify these things with Ms ROSE, Mr. CALVIN, and
Mr. HOBBS. They know about HIM. A CONCERNED EMPLOYEE
Slide 42
IG Investigations U.S. Army Inspector General School 42 Heres a
written complaint left on your door! DEAR INSPECTOR GENERAL, COL
Brown, the Director, is having an affair with the secretary.
Concerned and Jealous P.S. And he often doesnt even show up for
work!
Slide 43
IG Investigations U.S. Army Inspector General School 43 Proper
Allegation? What do you think? COL Robert E. Brown acted improperly
in that he committed adultery with Ms. Smith on 25 JUN 2014, in NJ,
in violation of the UCMJ. COL Robert E. Brown wasn't at work in
violation of AR 600-20, paragraph 2-17. Who, Improperly, Did,
IVO
Slide 44
IG Investigations U.S. Army Inspector General School 44 How
About These? COL Robert E. Brown committed adultery in violation of
Article 134 (Adultery), UCMJ. COL Robert E. Brown was improperly
absent from his place of duty in violation of Ft. Von Steuben
Supplement to AR 600-20, Command Policy, section 3, Garrison Staff
Officer Duties.
Slide 45
IG Investigations U.S. Army Inspector General School 45 Where
to Find Standards (use the standard for the time in question)
United States Code (USC): www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/ Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR): www.gpoaccess.gov/cfr/retrieve.html DoD
Directives: www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/ Army Regulations:
www.apd.army.mil/ or www.army.mil/usapa/ National Guard
Regulations: www.ngbpdc.ngb.army.mil/publications.htm Camp, Post or
Station local regulation, policy and SOP
Slide 46
IG Investigations U.S. Army Inspector General School 46 Summary
What are the Four Levels of Evidence? What is a Fact? What is the
IG Standard of Proof? What is the difference between an Issue and
an Allegation? Describe the parts of a properly worded Allegation.
What do you do with an allegation against a Senior Official?
Slide 47
IG Investigations U.S. Army Inspector General School 47 STEP 2:
Conduct IGPA Select a Course of Action Inspection Assistance
Inquiry Referral to another agency Investigation / Investigative
Inquiry A&I Guide Part Two, Section 2-1, 2-2, 2-3
Slide 48
IG Investigations If the allegation involves serious criminal
misconduct, then the IG will not normally investigate! These are
outside the IG purview. If substantiation and adverse action
appears certain, then refer the case to the command to consider
another form of investigation. Commanders must also consider these
factors: Established means for regulatory redress already exists
The Commander's preference is to select another means to
investigate the matter The IG recommended another non-specific form
of investigation U.S. Army Inspector General School 48 Reasons why
the IG Won't investigate The A&I Guide, Part Two, sections 2-5
and 2-6 (II-2-11, 13) ELO 8
Slide 49
IG Investigations U.S. Army Inspector General School 49 Not
Local IG Appropriate Allegations against Professionals Any Army
lawyers (military or civilian) refer to DAIGs Legal Advisor (AR
20-1, paragraph 7-1i (4)-(5)) IGs refer to next higher IG (AR 20-1,
paragraph 7-1j) Medical, CID Agents, Recruiters, Chaplains (The
A&I Guide, Part One, Section 3-8) AR 20-1, Paragraph 7-1i The
A&I Guide, Part One, Section 3-8 (I-3-11), and Part Two,
Section 2-5 (II-2-11)
Slide 50
IG Investigations U.S. Army Inspector General School 50
Allegations against Members of special-access programs (SAP)
Members of sensitive activities (SA) Report to DAIG Intelligence
Oversight Division within 2 working days AR 20-1, paragraph
1-4b(5)(e) The A&I Guide, Part One, Section 3-7 (I-3-10) Not
Local IG Appropriate Allegations against Members of SAPs &
SAs
Slide 51
IG Investigations Criminal Investigation Division UCMJ Rule
303, Preliminary Inquiry AR 15-6 Investigation UCMJ Article 32
hearing Military Police Investigation Chain of Command Civil
Authority Inspector General Do Nothing U.S. Army Inspector General
School 51 What are the Commanders Options? The A&I Guide, Part
Two, Section 1-2 (II-1-4), and 2-6 (II-2-13) 13 sex crime
Slide 52
IG Investigations U.S. Army Inspector General School 52 STEP 2:
Conduct IGPA Select a Course of Action Inspection Assistance
Inquiry Referral to another agency Investigation / Investigative
Inquiry A&I Guide Part Two, Section 2-1, 2-2, 2-3
Slide 53
IG Investigations U.S. Army Inspector General School 53 What
the IG SHOULD Investigate If the allegation is IG appropriate, then
the IG should investigate when... It is the Commanders preference;
or these factors are present: Lack of factual information
surrounding the allegation Started with the IG system; must finish
with IG system Sensitivity of allegations; IG are trained
investigators Confidentiality is important; identities must be
protected Protect reputations AND preserve unit cohesion If
substantiation is likely and adverse action appropriate, then refer
the allegation to the commander for some other investigation, and
use the final command product as evidence in your ROI or ROII.
A&I Guide Part Two, Section 2-6 (II-2-13)
Slide 54
IG Investigations INVESTIGATIVE INQUIRY Detailed IG Resolve
Allegations of a less serious nature Informal fact-finding process
(Directing Authority or Command IG directive) Written ROII Less
testimony, more statements U.S. Army Inspector General School 54
INVESTIGATION Detailed IG Resolve Allegations of a more serious
nature Formal fact-finding process (Directing Authority Written
Directive) Written ROI More testimony, less statements STEP 2:
Conduct IGPA Selection of Course of Action ELO 9
Slide 55
IG Investigations U.S. Army Inspector General School 55
Investigation / Investigative Inquiry Investigation: A fact-finding
examination into allegations, issues, or adverse conditions of a
serious nature to provide the directing authority with a sound
basis for decision and actions. Investigative Inquiry: A
fact-finding examination into allegations, issues, or adverse
conditions that are not as serious in nature. AR 20-1, paragraph
7-1a and 7-2 The A&I Guide, Part Two, Sections 1-2 (II-1-4),
2-7 (II-2-17), and 2-8 (II-2-18) FORMAL ROIROI INFORMAL ROIIROII
Both the ROI & ROII require the same measure of proof and due
diligence by the IG.
Slide 56
IG Investigations U.S. Army Inspector General School 56 Fair
and Impartial IGs are not an adversary or a champion IGs do not
recommend adverse action Thorough emphasis on facts IG
Confidentiality Limited distribution of information Overt but
discreet Protect all individuals from reprisal / ridicule:
including the accused Led by a Detailed IG Investigation vs.
Investigative Inquiry Similarities
Slide 57
IG Investigations U.S. Army Inspector General School 57
Investigation vs. Investigative Inquiry Differences Investigation
Written Directive from CG / Directing Authority Transcribed
testimony recorded under oath Investigative Inquiry Authorized by
Command IG or State IG; oral or written Statements may be recorded
but often are not under oath or sworn; if not sworn, then not
"testimony" AR 20-1, paragraph 7-1a and 7-2; The A&I Guide,
Part Two, Section 1-2 (II-1-5) The A&I Guide, Part Two, Section
2-9 (II-2-20)
Slide 58
IG Investigations U.S. Army Inspector General School 58
Reporting Requirements Inspectors General: Input allegations into
the IGARS database and report to the next higher-echelon IG for
appropriate action within two working days* AR 20-1, paragraph 7-1j
(1), and Appendix D-1 COL and below: Input allegations into the
IGARS database within two working days* Local IG can inquire /
investigate AR 20-1, paragraph 7-1k (1), and Appendix D-1; The
A&I Guide, Part Two, Section 2-5 * IGARS AUTOMATICALLY sends
SAIG-AC and SAIC-IN a notice. (AR 20-1, Table D-1, is out of date
for special reporting requirements to SAIG-AC for O4 O6, E-8, E-9).
AR 20-1, paragraph 7-1j, and Appendix D-1
Slide 59
IG Investigations U.S. Army Inspector General School 59 Summary
When is it not appropriate for an IG to investigate? When is it
appropriate for an IG to investigate? What factors favor choosing
an IG Investigation over an Investigative Inquiry? What are the
similarities and differences between an IG Investigation and an
Investigative Inquiry? What are the various reporting requirements
when an allegation is received?
Slide 60
IG Investigations U.S. Army Inspector General School 60 CASE
STUDY PE #1 - LTC Bowie (Class CD - Day 7- PE 1) What are the IG
reporting requirements? Who is the subject / suspect? What IG
office is the office of record? Why? What are the issues /
allegations?
Slide 61
IG Investigations Improper Relief "Toxic" Leadership Reign of
Terror Family Readiness Group Redeployment Spouse misbehavior ???
Why does the IG get "stuck" working leadership issues? U.S. Army
Inspector General School 61 Issues / Allegations COL Santa
Anna
Slide 62
IG Investigations Lets talk to the complainant PE #2 U.S. Army
Inspector General School 62 Acknowledge Receipt Continue with IGPA
Step 2 What do we do now?
Slide 63
IG Investigations U.S. Army Inspector General School 63 4-Part
Allegation #1 COL Santa Anna improperly abused his authority in his
treatment of subordinates and their spouses in violation of Army
Regulation (AR) 600-100, section 2-1 and Article 92 (3), UCMJ. #2
COL Santa Anna improperly relieved a subordinate commander in
violation of AR 600-20, section 2-17. xxxxxxxxxxxx AR 20-1,
Glossary
Slide 64
IG Investigations U.S. Army Inspector General School 64 Not
required, but it is a really good idea Helps refine allegations
Helps select proper standards Helps identify Elements of Proof SJA
interprets regulations and law and advises the commander on the
investigative COAs The IG investigates allegations of impropriety
Consultation with the SJA PE #3
Slide 65
IG Investigations Elements of Proof Words Have Meaning! Read
what the standard says "don't read into it" Conjunctions count And,
Or, Nor, For But, Yet, So Ask SJA for interpretation and advice
U.S. Army Inspector General School 65
Slide 66
IG Investigations Elements of Proof Article 92 (3), UCMJ,
states, "Any person subject to this chapter who is derelict in the
performance of his duties; shall be punished as a court-martial may
direct. Elements. (3) Dereliction in the performance of duties. (a)
That the accused had certain duties; and (b) That the accused knew
or reasonably should have known of the duties; and (c) That the
accused was (willfully) (through neglect or culpable inefficiency)
derelict in the performance of those duties. U.S. Army Inspector
General School 66
Slide 67
IG Investigations U.S. Army Inspector General School 67
Elements of Proof AR 600-100, paragraph 21, Abuse of Authority
Failure of one OR more of these could violate the standard. or a.
Set and exemplify the highest ethical and professional standards as
embodied in the Army Values. b. Accomplish the unit mission. c.
Ensure the physical, moral, personal, and professional wellbeing of
subordinates. d. Effectively communicate vision, purpose, and
direction. e. Build cohesive teams and empower subordinates. f.
Teach, coach, and counsel subordinates. g. Build discipline while
inspiring motivation, confidence, enthusiasm, and trust in
subordinates. h. Develop their own and their subordinates skills,
knowledge, and attitudes. i. Anticipate and manage change and be
able to act quickly and decisively under pressure. j. Use
initiative to assess risk and exploit opportunities. k. Treat
subordinates with dignity, respect, fairness, and consistency. l.
Foster a healthy command climate. (12 elements) (Only need
three...)
Slide 68
IG Investigations U.S. Army Inspector General School 68 a. When
a Senior Commander (SC) loses confidence in a subordinate
commanders ability to command due to misconduct, poor judgment, the
subordinates inability to complete assigned duties, or for other
similar reasons, the SC has the authority to relieve the
subordinate commander. 1. Must counsel unless inappropriate or
impractical under the circumstances. 2. Commander may temporarily
suspend, but must get final written approval from the first general
officer in the chain of command. 3. Action is temporary until the
first general officer in the chain of command submits his or her
written approval. "BUT" b. If relieved as a result of an AR 15-6
investigation, then 1. Referral and comment procedure of that
regulation must be followed. 2. Relieved officer may be temporarily
suspended pending completion of the procedural safeguards contained
in AR 15-6. 3. Action to relieve before completion of the
procedural safeguards of AR 15-6 is a temporary suspension.
Elements of Proof AR 600-20, paragraph 2-17 Relief for cause
Slide 69
IG Investigations U.S. Army Inspector General School 69 Summary
Explain elements of proof and where you find them. How does the IG
use the elements of proof within a standard during the preparation
and execution of an investigation or an investigative inquiry?
Slide 70
IG Investigations During preliminary analysis, we must select
an IG course of action to best solve the puzzle. Which IG course of
action do we choose? IG Investigation / IG Investigative Inquiry,
or Referral to another form of investigation? The Commanders
Guidance can help you determine which course of action to select.
It Depends/ CCIRs U.S. Army Inspector General School 70 Inspector
General Preliminary Analysis (Step 2 Course of Action)
Slide 71
IG Investigations U.S. Army Inspector General School 71 Factors
to consider favoring an Investigation: The allegation is serious
and could result in adverse action High degree of documentation is
important / required The potential for harm to a Soldier (or
Soldiers) exists Adversely affects the image of the Army May have
great impact on the command The allegation will likely have media
interest The Commander directs the IG to investigate Factors
favoring an Investigative Inquiry: Investigation or Investigative
Inquiry? ELO 10 The A&I Guide, Part Two, Sections 2-6
(II-2-14)
Slide 72
IG Investigations U.S. Army Inspector General School 72 No
formal authorization required Command or State IG may direct Based
on Commanders guidance (CCIRs) Results in an ROII AR 20-1,
paragraph 7-1a; The A&I Guide, Part Two, Section 2-9 (II-2-20)
Obtain Authority Investigative Inquiry
Slide 73
IG Investigations U.S. Army Inspector General School 73 Obtain
Authority Investigation AR 20-1, paragraph 7-1b (4); The A&I
Guide, Part Two, Section 2-9 (II-2-20) Requires a written Directive
from the directing authority (CG / TAG / TIG) The Detailed IG
leading the investigation normally prepares the Action Memorandum
and the Directive The CIG normally briefs the directing authority
to request signature on the Directive Results in an ROI
Slide 74
IG Investigations U.S. Army Inspector General School 74 Action
Memorandum Gives background information States the allegation(s)
Summarizes the entire case Provides the scope and the limits of the
investigation Includes SJA opinion Recommends approval to proceed
Signed by the Command IG This is pre-decisional: NOT RELEASABLE
FOIA EXEMPT
Slide 75
IG Investigations U.S. Army Inspector General School 75
Authorizes the investigation or inquiry General description of the
allegation Names are not included to protect confidentiality
Directive IS RELEASABLE and presented to all those necessary to
show your authority Signed by the Directing Authority Directive
subject to FOIA
Slide 76
IG Investigations U.S. Army Inspector General School 76 Action
Memo + Directive Ensures a clear, mutual understanding between the
IG and the directing authority concerning who and what to
investigate The IGs "order" from the Directing Authority PE #4
Slide 77
IG Investigations U.S. Army Inspector General School 77 Step
Three: Referrals and Initial Notifications Step 3 Initiate
Referrals Make Initial Notifications AR 20-1, paragraph 6-1d (3)
and 7-1b(3); The A&I Guide, Part Two, Chapter 3 (II-3-1)
Slide 78
IG Investigations U.S. Army Inspector General School 78
Initiate Referrals (Step 3) If a non-IG investigation is
appropriate at this time, the IG will refer it to the proper
authority and coordinate initial notifications. What can the IG
tell another Army investigator? What can the IG tell a non-Army
investigator? AR 20-1, paragraphs 3-5 & 7-1; The A&I Guide,
Part Two, Section 3-1 (II-3-2)
Slide 79
IG Investigations PE #5 Lets notify COL Santa Anna U.S. Army
Inspector General School 79 Initial Notifications (Step 3) Verbally
notify appropriate commanders and or supervisors of the
investigation (inquiry) and inform them of the nature of the
allegations Verbally notify the subjects or suspects of the
investigation (inquiry) and inform them of the nature of the
allegations, or the specific allegations Record notifications in
IGARS and in the ROI / ROII AR 20-1, paragraph 7-1b; The A&I
Guide, Part Two, Section 3-2 (II-3-5)
Slide 80
IG Investigations U.S. Army Inspector General School 80 Summary
What are the contents and purpose of the Action Memorandum? What
are the contents and purpose of the Directive?
Slide 81
IG Investigations U.S. Army Inspector General School 81 Step
Four: IG Fact Finding The A&I Guide, Part Two, Chapter 4
(II-4-1) Investigation / Investigative Inquiry ----- Plan Gather
Evidence Evaluate Evidence Write Report Obtain Legal Review Obtain
Approval Assistance Inquiry ----- Plan Gather Information Evaluate
Information Resolve Issue(s) Write Report Documents IG Observations
Testimonies Physical Objects Documents Telephone Calls Make
Contacts Coordinate Report Inspection ----- Follow the IG
Inspections Process ss Step 4 IG Fact Finding
Slide 82
IG Investigations U.S. Army Inspector General School 82 Written
Investigative Plan DEFINITION An IG Investigation requires a
written investigative plan (working document) An investigative plan
must include 3 things: W itness list including complainant, SMEs,
and subject / suspect How many? I tinerary / schedule: time,
location, and sequence of Interviews I nterrogatories / Interview
Questions ELO 11 AR 20-1, paragraph 7-1b(4); The A&I Guide,
Part Two, Section 4-3 (II-4-5)
Slide 83
IG Investigations PE #6 Complete the Plan W itness List I
tinerary (time, place, sequence) I nterrogatories / Interview
Questions The plan may also require security, travel, messing, and
administrative support etc. Be Prepared to Change Your Plan!!! U.S.
Army Inspector General School 83 IG Investigative Plan
Slide 84
IG Investigations U.S. Army Inspector General School 84 Gather
Evidence (Step 4: IG Fact Finding) Create an Evidence Matrix....
Collect documents........... Collect physical
evidence.......................... Conduct interviews:
Complainant..................
Experts....................................
Witnesses........................................... Subjects /
Suspects............................ ELO 12
Slide 85
IG Investigations U.S. Army Inspector General School 85
Evidence terms Standards (evaluate evidence using standards)
Documentary evidence Evidence from interviews: oral & written
Sworn = Testimony Recorded Under Oath Transcribed Summarized Not
sworn = Statements Oral or Written Summarized Written and submitted
by witness Other Evidence (physical objects) IGs personal
observations avoid (....why?)
Slide 86
IG Investigations U.S. Army Inspector General School 86
Interrogatory Interview Questions What are the standards and
elements of proof? Determine the key facts necessary to address the
elements of proof. Who What When Where Why How How many / how much
WHAT IS A FACT?
Slide 87
IG Investigations U.S. Army Inspector General School 87 Do you
and Ms Smith have a romantic relationship? Do others perceive your
relationship with Ms Smith as inappropriate? Are you always
performing your duties as required? Interview Questions (cont'd)
Describe the nature of your relationship with Ms Smith. Describe
when and where you must perform your duties away from your office
and / or after normal duty hours. What additional information can
you provide that will help the IG resolve this matter? Weak
interview: Stronger interview:
Slide 88
IG Investigations Interview Questions (cont'd) U.S. Army
Inspector General School 88 Describe the nature of your
relationship with Ms. Smith. We have an intimate and romantic
relationship. It is both professional and personal. What about your
relationship might others perceive as improper? When did this
intimate relationship begin? I don 't know. Ask them. After my
divorce. Its been awhile. We spend a lot of time together. The
A&I Guide, Part Two, Appendix B (II-B-3) Be prepared to adjust
and to change the focus of your questioning based on the answers. Q
A Q A A
Slide 89
IG Investigations Improper reliefAbuse of AuthorityOther/Due
Outs LTC BowieBelieves he was relieved in theater because CDR did
not like wife COL Santa Anna claimed relief was for poor judgment
COL Santa Anna threatened Bowie; get wife under control or be
relived (page 6) BG Klink warned LTC Bowie Santa Anna "out to get
him" Relived March 6 BN Commanders confronted Santa Anna Mrs. Santa
Anna threatened to have him relieved and COL Santa Anna ratified
the threat "my wife speaks for me" Has not received his OER COL
Santa Anna removed BN S-3 just before deployment Mrs. Santa Anna
abusive, COL Santa Anna did not intervene Interview LTC Ewing, LTC
Crockett, LTC Houston, MAJ Rose, and Ursula Bowie Consult with SJA,
re: FRG coordinator cooperation requirements E-mail"If you cannot
get your wife under control, then I will find someone who can.
Signed Gunfighter Six." MAJ Rose LTC Crockett LTC Ewing Betty Santa
Anna COL Santa Anna U.S. Army Inspector General School 89 Evidence
Matrix Investigation Plan OTR 12-0021 Complaint Letter 14 APR LTC
Bowie Interview 17 APR FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY. DISSEMINATION IS
PROHIBITED EXCEPT AS AUTHORIZED BY AR 20-1. Deployed OEF 6 MAR 5
MAR Ordered to Report Santa Anna command LTC Bowie Relieved
Disagreement and Email MAR DEC OCT TIMELINE (according to LTC
Bowie) organize your data early & often
Slide 90
IG Investigations How many witnesses must the IG interview?
What is required in an IG investigative plan? What information goes
on the evidence matrix? Who do you interview first? Last? In
between? Does the IG have to interview all the witnesses that the
complainant and the suspect suggest? Why? or Why not? U.S. Army
Inspector General School 90 Summary
Slide 91
IG Investigations Day 7 Summary (1 of 3) Defined Witness,
Subject, Suspect Rights of each DA civilian employee cooperation
Civilian-civilian cooperation What to do when a witness
incriminates themselves Four levels of evidence Define Fact U.S.
Army Inspector General School 91
Slide 92
IG Investigations Day 7 Summary (2 of 3) Defined IG Standard of
Proof Difference between an issue and allegation The parts of a
properly worded 4-Part allegation When is it not appropriate for an
IG to investigate? When is it appropriate for an IG to investigate?
The factors favoring an IG Investigation over an Investigative
Inquiry U.S. Army Inspector General School 92
Slide 93
IG Investigations Day 7 Summary (3 of 3) Similarities and
differences between an Investigation and an Investigative Inquiry
How many witnesses to interview Requirements of an IG investigative
plan U.S. Army Inspector General School 93
Slide 94
IG Investigations U.S. Army Inspector General School 94 Execute
Your Plan Collect documents throughout IGs usually take testimony
under oath. How many witnesses do we interview? MINIMUM NUMBER
NECESSARY to substantiate or refute the allegation(s) you decide
IG! Thorough, but dont go for overkill! The A&I Guide, Part
Two, Section 4-3 (II-4-5)
Slide 95
IG Investigations Let's search the web and other documents Lets
interview LTC Ewing and LTC Crockett PE #7 What did we get? What
now IG? Update the Matrix & timeline! U.S. Army Inspector
General School 95 Gather More Evidence
Slide 96
IG Investigations Lets interview MAJ Rose, Rear Detachment
Commander PE #8 What did we get? What now IG? Update the Matrix
& timeline! U.S. Army Inspector General School 96 Gather More
Evidence
Slide 97
IG Investigations U.S. Army Inspector General School 97
Four-Part Interview The A&I Guide, Part Two, Section 4-9
(II-4-26), and Appendix A (II-A-2) 1.Pre-brief (not recorded never
off the record) 2.Read-in (recorded) 3.Questioning (recorded)
4.Read-out (recorded) Prepare using Appendix A: Interview Prep
Book
Slide 98
IG Investigations U.S. Army Inspector General School 98
Interview: Part 1 Establish rapport Lay down the ground rules 1.
Pre-brief (explain in plain English) The IG interview process and
IG confidentiality The IG's Role Privacy Act Header Sheet Rights
Warning Swearing / Affirming Oaths Filling in documents and forms
Observe baseline behavior of the witnesss speech and mannerisms.
(as an IG, not as an "Interrogator") The A&I Guide, Part Two,
Section 4-9 (II-4-26)
Slide 99
IG Investigations 2. Read-in (recorded): Verbatim 3.
Questioning (recorded): Follow interrogatory BUT listen to the
witness' answers and adjust accordingly. You may stop the
recorder... but you are never off the record. 4. Read-out
(recorded): Verbatim U.S. Army Inspector General School 99
Interview Parts 2, 3 + 4 The A&I Guide, Part Two, Section 4-9
(II-4-26), and Appendix A (II-A-12)
Slide 100
IG Investigations Preparation & Rehearsal IG Attitude &
Demeanor IG ability to: Put the witness at ease Maintain
impartiality Adapt to the unexpected LISTEN! LISTEN! LISTEN!
OBSERVE! No Surprises - No Trickery IG must ask the questions
necessary to uncover credible evidence that address elements of
proof! U.S. Army Inspector General School 100 Successful Interviews
The A&I Guide, Part Two, Sections 1-6, 4-4 through 4-11, and
Appendix B
Slide 101
IG Investigations U.S. Army Inspector General School 101
Interviews AVOID: Being defensive / aggressive Interrupting the
witness Asking: Yes or No questions Leading questions Irrelevant
questions DO NOT: Lose control of interview Lose your temper Give
advice or counsel Be intimidated
Slide 102
IG Investigations U.S. Army Inspector General School 102
Interviews: What NOT To Do! {Show news report video about a tape
recorded IG interview... gone wrong!} issue the graded homework
exercise U.S. Army Inspector General School 113 Prepare to Write
the ROI The A&I Guide, Part Two, Sections 4-14 (II-4-44), 4-15
(II-4-142), and 4-18 (II-4-153)">
IG Investigations Review ALL of the evidence Review ALL of the
elements of proof Complete and check your Evidence Matrix Complete
the Force-Field Diagram(s) Organize your evidence into report
exhibits USE the A&I Guide write the synopsis LAST! PE # 12
> issue the graded homework exercise U.S. Army Inspector General
School 113 Prepare to Write the ROI The A&I Guide, Part Two,
Sections 4-14 (II-4-44), 4-15 (II-4-142), and 4-18 (II-4-153)
Slide 114
IG Investigations U.S. Army Inspector General School 114 ROI
Tips Allegations: Be clear, concise, and consistent Standards: Use
the correct one(s) Evidence: Address elements of proof in
standard(s) Discussion: Explain the credibility of the evidence,
AND discuss both sides of the allegation (support and refute)
thoroughly Style: Past tense; alleged (NOT passive voice) Testified
(under oath) vs. stated (not under oath) Footer on all report
pages: For Official Use Only (FOUO) Dissemination is prohibited
except as authorized by AR 20-1 Example ROI in Section 4-14 The
A&I Guide, Part Two, Sections 4-14 and 4-18, pages II-4-44 to
67, Appendix E
Slide 115
IG Investigations U.S. Army Inspector General School 115 ROI
Tips SYNOPSIS: Write this part last! The synopsis should include a
concise summary of the elements of proof from the standard, the key
evidence on both sides, and a comparison of the evidence leading to
the conclusion. The A&I Guide, Part Two, Sections 4-14 and
4-18, pages II-4-44 to 67, Appendix E IGs never recommend adverse
action. However, recommending administrative action to correct a
mistake is appropriate. For instance, recovering an unauthorized
BAH or TDY payment is not an adverse action.
Slide 116
IG Investigations ROI / ROII Other Matters: 5. (1 st matter) 6.
(2 nd matter) 7. Unfavorable info: 2. (S/N) Allegation: a. b. c. 3.
(U/F) Issue: a. b. c. 4. (U/F) Issue: a. b. c. U.S. Army Inspector
General School 116 Executive Summary Name / position Authority
Background S / N Allegation #1 Synopsis S / N Allegation #2...
Synopsis U / F Issue #1 Discussion U / F Issue #2... Discussion
Consideration of Allegations 1. (S/N) Allegation: a. Evidence (1)
Complaint (2) Standard (3) Document (4) Testimony b. Discussion (5
parts) (1) Allegation (2) Standard (3) Evidence>S (4)
Evidence>N (5) Analysis c. Conclusion AR 20-1, paragraph 7-2;
The A&I Guide, Part Two, Sections 2-7, 4-1, 4-14, 4-15, II-E-2
Recommendations: 8. Approve & close 9. Fix the issue 10. Fix
the issue 11. Fix other matter 12. Fix other matter ELO 14 How you
read the ROI
Slide 117
IG Investigations How you write the ROI ROI / ROII Other
Matters: 5. (1 st matter) 6. (2 nd matter) 7. Unfavorable info: 2.
(S/N) Allegation: a. b. c. 3. (U/F) Issue: a. b. c. 4. (U/F) Issue:
a. b. c. U.S. Army Inspector General School 117 Executive Summary
Name / position Authority Background S / N Allegation #1 Synopsis S
/ N Allegation #2... Synopsis U / F Issue #1 Discussion U / F Issue
#2... Discussion Consideration of Allegations 1. (S/N) Allegation:
a. Evidence (1) Complaint (2) Standard (3) Document (4) Testimony
b. Discussion (5 parts) (1) Allegation (2) Standard (3)
Evidence>S (4) Evidence>N (5) Analysis c. Conclusion AR 20-1,
paragraph 7-2; The A&I Guide, Part Two, Sections 2-7, 4-1,
4-14, 4-15, II-E-2 5 Recommendations: 8. Approve & close 9. Fix
the issue 10. Fix the issue 11. Fix other matter 12. Fix other
matter ELO 14 6 1 4 3 2 what "RIGHT" looks like
Slide 118
IG Investigations DOCUMENTS STANDARDS TESTIMONY 1. (S)
ALLEGATION: Adultery a. EVIDENCE (1) (2) (3) b. DISCUSSION (has
five parts) c. CONCLUSION 2. (N) ALLEGATION: Absent a. EVIDENCE (1)
(2) (3) b. DISCUSSION (has five parts) c. CONCLUSION U.S. Army
Inspector General School 118 from ACTION MEMO DOCUMENTS STANDARDS
TESTIMONY CONSIDERATION OF ALLEGATIONS The A&I Guide, Part Two,
Section 4-14 (II-4-44) and Appendix E (II-E-1) Include ALL credible
evidence in order to logically demonstrate that the preponderance
of credible evidence supports your conclusion. A&I Guide,
Appendix E 1 summarize verbatim logical! summarize
Slide 119
IG Investigations Consideration of Allegations 1.
(SUBSTANTIATED) ALLEGATION: COL Brown conducted an adulterous
relationship in violation of Article 134, UCMJ. {allegation
directly from the Action Memorandum} a. EVIDENCE: {documents,
testimony, statements, other evidence} (1) An undated anonymous
written complaint, received 5 November 20XX, alleged that COL Brown
conducted an adulterous relationship. (EXHIBIT A-2) {summarize key
points} (2) Article 134, UCMJ, Manual for Courts-Martial 2008,
prohibits adultery. The elements of proof are: "That the accused
wrongfully had sexual intercourse with a...." (EXHIBIT C-1) {may
summarize if long or verbatim if short} U.S. Army Inspector General
School 119 1
Slide 120
IG Investigations a. EVIDENCE: {continued} (3) Installation
Leadership Conference agenda, Ft. Dix, NJ, dated 24 October 20XX,
listed the time table of events as well as the conference attendee
roster... (EXHIBIT B-11) {properly reference and summarize} (4) Ft
Von Steuben Air Field (VSAF) Flight Operations log, dated 23
October 20XX, had COL Brown and Ms. Smith manifested on Flight #
11-28 to McGuire AFB... (EXHIBIT C-12) [IO Note: Use this format if
necessary to explain details not contained within the document.]
U.S. Army Inspector General School 120 Consideration of Allegations
(cont'd)
Slide 121
IG Investigations a. EVIDENCE: {continued} (5) MAJ Philip
Jackson, HHC, 66 th AVN, testified on 4 January 20XX, that...
(EXHIBIT B-4) {summarize points for this allegation} (6) Ms Betty
Jones, GS12, Executive Assistant, Flight OPS, Ft Von Steuben Air
Field, testified on 5 January 20XX, that.... (EXHIBIT B-5)
{summarize points for this allegation} Evidence Do's and Don'ts Do:
Summarize Explain the evidence Be succinct Don't: Cut and paste
whole documents Include irrelevant information Include unsupported
IG opinion U.S. Army Inspector General School 121 Consideration of
Allegations (cont'd)
Slide 123
IG Investigations Write the SYNOPSIS for each allegation after
you have completed the RECOMMENDATIONS. The SYNOPSIS is a concise
retelling of all parts in the Consideration Of Allegations. 5 1 2.
(NOT SUBSTANTIATED) ALLEGATION: COL Brown was improperly absent
from his place of duty in violation of... a. Evidence... b.
Discussion... c. Conclusion... OTHER MATTERS: 3. Issue the
commander must address 4. Issue awareness for the commander {do not
introduce 'new' evidence or issues} RECOMMENDATIONS: 5. Approve the
report and close the case. 6. Address each OTHER MATTER with a
recommendation 7. Address each OTHER MATTER with a recommendation
U.S. Army Inspector General School 123 Next Allegation(s),
Issue(s), Other Matters, Recommendation(s) 2 3 4 must lead to
(Always first!)
Slide 124
IG Investigations U.S. Army Inspector General School 124 Obtain
Commanders Approval of the ROI /ROII SJA review; always for ROI 'S'
for ROII Hand-carry the report to the Commander CIG usually briefs
results to the Commander Commander can: Approve Modify Direct
additional action Disapprove The A&I Guide, Part Two, Section
4-16 (II-4-150)
Slide 125
IG Investigations U.S. Army Inspector General School 125 Step
Five: Final Notifications Step 5 Make Notification of Results AR
20-1, paragraph 7-1b(5) The A&I Guide, Part Two, Chapter 5
(II-5-1)
Slide 126
IG Investigations U.S. Army Inspector General School 126 Make
Notification of Results (Step 5) Prepare all IG records for proper
retention before notifications (will cover during IG Records class
on Day 10) Commander / Supervisor: [Format: A&I Guide page
II-5-4] Notify them in writing of the approved results in the ROI /
ROII and enclose a copy of the notification in the case file
Subject / Suspect: [Format: A&I Guide page II-5-3] Notify them
in writing of the approved results of the ROI / ROII and enclose a
copy of the notification in the case file Notify them of any
unfavorable information included in the ROI / ROII if they were not
previously apprised during the investigation, and provide them the
opportunity to comment Notification of any substantiated
allegations must include FOIA request procedures / instructions AR
20-1, paragraph 7-1b(5); The A&I Guide, Part Two, Chapter 5
(II-5-1)
Slide 127
IG Investigations U.S. Army Inspector General School 127
Requests for IG Information Review own testimony: (before the
report is complete) Witness, subject / suspect: In the IG office,
but they dont get to keep a copy AR 20-1, paragraph 3-7; The
A&I Guide, Part Two, Section 1-4 Department of the Army
Investigator: (before or after the report is complete) Allegation
list Documents not given in confidence to the IG Witness list with
brief synopsis of relevant testimony AR 20-1, paragraph 3-5 FOIA:
Unofficial business (only after the report is approved) AR 20-1,
paragraph 3-4 ELO 15
Slide 128
IG Investigations U.S. Army Inspector General School 128
Release of IG Records Release Authority (All IG Records): TIG (or
designated representative) BEWARE of careless handling of IG
documents (maintain control). Don't give unauthorized info to
complainant, witness, subject / suspect, commanders or senior
leaders (COS or other GOs) that are not your Directing Authority.
Official Use 1) Inspection Reports (Directing Authority); 2) ROI /
ROII (Within Directing Authority); 3) "BIG 3" (DA Investigator):
Nature of allegations, readily available documents, witness list
with a synopsis of their testimony. Adverse ActionNOTHING: TIG only
can approve based on request properly submitted to DAIG Non-DA
Official NOTHING: FOIA request must be submitted to website or
DAIG's Records-Release Office within 2 days (only after the case is
closed) Unofficial Use
Slide 129
IG Investigations U.S. Army Inspector General School 129 Step
Six: Follow-Up AR 20-1, paragraph 6-1 & 7-1 The A&I Guide,
Part Two, Chapter 6 (II-6-1) Step 6 Follow-Up
Slide 130
IG Investigations U.S. Army Inspector General School 130
Conduct Follow-up (Step 6) Follow-up ensures that all IG
allegations and issues were thoroughly addressed and IG
responsibilities were completed If the IG cannot attach
notifications and responses from the subject or suspect to
unfavorable information that appeared in the ROI / ROII to the
electronic IGARS file, then physically maintain them with the case
file AR 20-1, paragraphs 6-1 & 7-1; The A&I Guide, Part
Two, Chapter 6 (II-6-1)
Slide 131
IG Investigations U.S. Army Inspector General School 131 Step
Seven: Close the IGAR Step 7 Close the IGAR AR 20-1, paragraph 7-1
The A&I Guide, Part Two, Chapter 7
Slide 132
IG Investigations U.S. Army Inspector General School 132 Step
Seven: Close the IGAR 1.Provide complainant a final reply in
writing [Format: A&I Guide page II-7-2] 2.Close the file in the
IGARS database 3.Make appropriate reports 4.Analyze developing
trends AR 20-1, paragraph 7-1; The A&I Guide, Part Two,Chapter
7 (II-7-1)
Slide 133
IG Investigations What section of the ROI / ROII do you write
first and why? What section of the graded homework ROI / ROII do
you write last and why? If you substantiate any allegations, then
what information must you provide to the subject / suspect in the
final notification? If you receive a verbal FOIA Request? If you
receive a written FOIA Request? U.S. Army Inspector General School
133 Summary
Slide 134
IG Investigations U.S. Army Inspector General School 134
QUESTIONS?