Upload
kenneth-chapman
View
216
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
A PROJECT OF SERESC Developing a Screening Process for Determining Young Children in
Need of Targeted Supports2015 Alaska RTI Conference
January 25, 2015
Howard Muscott, Ed.D, DirectorNH Center for Effective Behavioral Interventions and Supports
Bedford, NH www.nhcebis.seresc.net; 603-206-6891; [email protected]
A PROJECT OF SERESC
Outcomes
1. Understand how Tier 2 supports fit into the 3-Tier PWPBIS as Response to Instruction Framework
2. Identify three pathways for determining risk;3. Develop a form for gathering information from
staff; 4. Develop behavioral indicators and cut scores; &5. Understand how to use a normed systematic
screening assessment.6. To learn about how screening was successfully
used to implement Tiered Interventions in Head Starts
A PROJECT OF SERESC
Agenda
1.Overview of PWPBIS2.Features of Tier 23.Pathways for Determining
Risk4.Teacher Nomination5.Behavioral Indicators6.Normed Screening Tools
and Procedures7.Post Screening Processes
A PROJECT OF SERESC
5
A Systemic Multi-tiered Approach
“PBIS has allowed me to address problems early before they escalated and became a crisis. The shift from reactive to proactive has been one of the best changes I’ve seen in all my years of consulting in Head Start programs.”
NH Head Start Mental Health Consultant
A PROJECT OF SERESC
Program-wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports
Muscott, Mann & Pomerleau (2008)
PWPBIS is a systematic framework for improving valued social, emotional, behavioral and learning outcomes for young children in early childhood education programs.
PWPBIS uses a broad set of evidence-based systemic and individualized strategies to effectively prevent and respond to challenging problem behavior and collaborate with families.
PWPBIS is a strategic approach in which collaborative teams use effective group processes and data-based decision-making to achieve desired outcomes.
6
A PROJECT OF SERESC
SYSTEMS
PRACTICES
DATA
SupportingStaff Behavior
SupportingDecisionMaking
SupportingStudent Behavior and Families
Program-wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports Systems
7
Program-wide Positive Behavior Supports in Early Childhood Education Programs
Preventative Practices
Building Positive Relationships with Children and Families
Social and Emotional Teaching Strategies
Individualized Strategies
Primary Promotion: High Quality Early Education for All Children
Secondary Prevention: Explicit Instruction for Groups of Children at Risk
Tertiary Intervention: Function-Based Support for Children with Persistent Challenges
Muscott, Mann & Pomerleau (2008) Adapted from the Center on the Social and Educational Foundations for Early
Learning
8
A PROJECT OF SERESC
9
A PROJECT OF SERESC
Tier 1: Primary Prevention in ECE
Tier 1, primary prevention, is designed to address the whole population in the ECE program
While applied to the entire preschool, the emphasis here is on reaching the approximately 80-90% of young children who do not have serious behavior problems or mental health needs
The purpose of universal strategies is to maximize learning, deter problem behavior, and increase positive peer and adult interactions
10
A PROJECT OF SERESC
Tier 1: Primary Prevention in ECE
All children should receive sufficient density of positive feedback from their caregivers.
All families should be positively engaged.
Building Positive Relationships with Children and Families
Sources: Shores, Gunter, & Jack, 1993; Brendekamp & Copple, 1997).
11
A PROJECT OF SERESC
Tier 1: Primary Prevention in ECE
1. Maintain a predictable schedule
2. Minimize and plan effective transitions
3. Provide visual reminders of rules
4. Teach appropriate behavior5. Use positive reinforcement
to promote appropriate behavior
6. Provide choices where appropriate, and
7. Maximize child engagement to minimize problem behaviors.
Preventative Practices
Sources: Laus, Danko, Lawry, Strain, & Smith, 1999; Strain & Hemmeter (1999)
12
A PROJECT OF SERESC
Tier 2: Secondary Prevention in Early Childhood Education
Tier 2, secondary prevention, is aimed at the roughly 5-10% of young children considered at risk for developing behavioral disorders or mental illness
These students enter school with significant risk factors and are usually unresponsive to universal prevention strategies alone.
The goal of secondary prevention is two-fold: To decrease opportunities in which high-risk
behaviors might be fostered To establish effective and efficient prosocial
repertoires that would increase their responsiveness to primary interventions
A PROJECT OF SERESC
Tier 2: Secondary Prevention in ECE
Explicit instruction in emotional literacy skills, controlling impulses and anger and friendship-making skills is provided to small groups of children.
Research indicates that systematic efforts to promote children’s social competence can have both preventive and remedial effects.
Sources: Fox, Dunlap, Hemmeter, Joseph & Strain, 2003; Webster-Stratton & Reid (2004)
Social & Emotional Teaching Strategies
14
A PROJECT OF SERESC
Tier 3: Tertiary Interventions
Level 3, tertiary interventions, targets the 1-5% of young children who display persistent challenging symptoms or behaviors
The goal of tertiary interventions is to reduce the frequency, intensity and complexity of a child's maladaptive behavior patterns and provide him/her with suitable, efficient and effective replacement behaviors that will compete with his/her more maladaptive ones.
Tertiary interventions are individualized, assessment-based and designed to meet individual needs.
15
A PROJECT OF SERESC
Tier 3: Tertiary Interventions Function-based interventions
are developed through the process of functional assessment (FA) and behavior support plans (BSP).
Functional assessment determines why the student exhibits challenging behavior.
BSPs are most effective when developed by a team with family involvement.
Individualized Strategies
Sources: Blair, Umbreit, & Eck, 2000; Dunlap & Fox, 1999; Galensky, Miltenberger, Stricker, & Garlinghouse, 2001; Moes & Frea, 2000; Reeve & Carr, 2000).
16
A PROJECT OF SERESC
Steps for Addressing Children in Need of Tier 2 Supports
Develop a process for screening/nomination of children who are not responding to Tier 1 behavior supports and may need additional supports
A PROJECT OF SERESC
What is Screening? Salvia & Ysseldyke (1988)
Screening is an initial stage of assessment in which those who may evidence a particular problem are sorted out from among the general population.
Individuals who perform poorly on screening measures as considered “at-risk.”
A PROJECT OF SERESC
Features of Good Universal Screening
Accurate Cost efficient Acceptable Useful
A PROJECT OF SERESC
Why Universal Screening?
To find children whose problems are not immediately obvious and identify problems with a high degree of accuracy
Early identification leads to early intervention
Preschools that implement Universal Screening select interventions based on results of the screening tools. This is effective and efficient.
A PROJECT OF SERESC
Universally Accepted Types of Screening in School
Readiness
Vision
Hearing
DentalBehavior
Why not?
A PROJECT OF SERESC
Why Screen for Behavior Disorders? It’s Costly Not To!
Indicators of problem behaviors are evident in preschoolers and elementary age students
Internalizers are missed with other approachesEarly intervention mattersSchools are the only place where we have
universal accessRecommended by the President’s New Freedom
Commission and Special Education Task Force, Surgeon General, Safe Schools/Healthy Students as an evidenced-based practice
A PROJECT OF SERESC
Minimizing ErrorsEffective Screening Programs
A screening-identification program to be considered effective, it must insure acceptable levels of accuracy, cost efficiency, and consumer acceptance.
Accuracy implies that the screening process provides reliable and valid information for the purposes of making decisions (Hartmann, Roper, & Bradford, 1979).
Cost efficiency means that, relative to the outcomes produced or achieved, the system's implementation does not consume too much professional time.
Acceptance implies that such a system would be adopted by professionals and used repeatedly over time.
A PROJECT OF SERESC
I’m Concerned About A Child What Should I Do?
Screening for Behavior
A PROJECT OF SERESC
Activity 1: Current Supports
Think: Identify your current process for getting help with a student for whom you have behavioral concerns (5 minutes)
Pair Up: Discuss with colleagues next to you (5 minutes)
Share Out: (5 minutes)
A PROJECT OF SERESC
Activation Pathways to Secondary Tier 2 Systems of Behavior Support
Muscott & Mann (2010)
Universal Screening
Using Normed
Systematic Screening
Assessments
Universal Screening Using Local Benchmarks
Behavioral Indicators (+ and -)Instances of Challenging Behavior,
Attendance, Tardiness, Nurse Visits, etc.
Teacher Nomination
Parent Nomination
Secondary Systems Activationthrough Team-based Decision Making Process
Students Are Not Responding to Core Curriculum & Tier 1 Systems
A PROJECT OF SERESC
Teacher Activation to Tier 2 Team
Begins with completion of an activation formForm should be efficient and easy to completeIt should include a reason for requesting
supportsIt should include a quick data summary
including behavioral and academic indicatorsIt could include what has been triedAmount of information should match what’s
necessary to make good decision about potential supports
Consider what forms and information were used with Tier 1 teams
Nomination Form
A PROJECT OF SERESC
Activity 2: Nomination Form
Think: Review the example nomination form. Make suggested edits that might improve the form for use in your early childhood program. (10 minutes)
Pair Up: Discuss with colleagues next to you (5 minutes)
Share Out: (5 minutes)
A PROJECT OF SERESC
Early Identification: Behavioral Indicators and Cut Scores
1. Behavioral indicators of students at risk should be identified
2. Indicators should be practical and related to behavioral risk
3. Data indicators should be easy to collect or already available
4. Cut scores should be determined for time periods that are practical based on program
A PROJECT OF SERESC
Isn’t Challenging Behavior Enough?
Students with
externalizing problems?
Students with
internalizing problems?
A PROJECT OF SERESC
Challenging Behaviors in Early Childhood
1. Physical Aggression2. Verbal Aggression 3. Self-injury4. Property Damage5. Disruption/Tantrum6. Non-compliance7. Social
Withdrawal/Isolation8. Inappropriate
Language9. Running Away10. Unsafe Behaviors
A PROJECT OF SERESC
Defining Challenging Behaviors
Physical Aggression – forceful physical actions directed towards adults/peers that may result in physical contact and injury (e.g., hitting, kicking, spitting, pinching, and throwing objects).
Verbal Aggression – the use of threatening, offensive or intimidating words directed towards an adult/peer (e.g., screaming, name-calling, swearing/ profanity, use of threats).
32
A PROJECT OF SERESC
Defining Challenging Behaviors
Disruption/Tantrum – an outburst or action that prevents learning or interferes with teaching and persists despite an adult’s request to stop or attempt to provide support.
Non-compliance – refusal to follow a reasonable request, direction or the established routine, which persists after multiple requests and a reasonable amount of time.
Running away – the act of leaving a designated area of supervision or boundary of play without permission and without responding to the requests of an adult to return.
33
A PROJECT OF SERESC
Tier 2 Behavioral Indicators, Cut Scores and Benchmarking
Periods for ECE ProgramsIndicator November 1 February 1 March 1
Instances of Challenging Behavior
3 or more 3 or more in this timeframe
3 or more this timeframe
Nurse TLC Visits (Non-medical)
4 or more 4 in this timeframe
4 in this timeframe
Absences 3 or more 3 in this timeframe
3 in this timeframe
High Stress Event (Death in immediate family, divorce, domestic violence, etc.)
1 or more 1 in this timeframe
1 in this timeframe
A PROJECT OF SERESC
Behavioral Indicators within Timeframe
Students: 20 Referrals: 25
Office Discipline Referrals (no minors)08/01/2009-10/06/2009
A PROJECT OF SERESC
Activity 3: Behavioral Indicators
Think: 1. Determine a practical time period that aligns with your school calendar. 2. Identify/name 2-3 potential Tier II indicators on the chart. 3. For one indicator, determine the cut score for the initial time period.(10 minutes)
Pair Up: Discuss with colleagues next to you. (5 minutes)
Share Out: (5 minutes)
A PROJECT OF SERESC
Tier 2 Behavioral Indicators, Cut Scores and Benchmarking
Periods for ECE ProgramsIndicator Date Date Date Date
A PROJECT OF SERESC
Features of an Evidence-based Screening Practice
Good psychometric properties Reliability Validity
Screening selects true positives and minimizes false negatives
Multi-source and multi-method assessment and intervention are the most accurate and effective.
Factors associated with long term outcomesEfficient to implementLow costIntervention and services are targeted for the
appropriate child
A PROJECT OF SERESC
39
Scientifically ValidatedEarly Childhood Assessments
ASQ:SE Screening – Determining the Need for Additional Supports
An easy-to-use, research-validated screening system that helps educators assess children’s social-emotional development
Self-regulation, compliance, communication, adaptive functioning, autonomy, affect, and interactions with people
With the results, professionals can quickly recognize young children at-risk for social or emotional difficulties, identify behaviors of concern to caregivers, and identify any need for further assessment or intervention.
A PROJECT OF SERESC
41
Devereux Early Childhood Assessment Clinical (DECA-C)
Ages 2-5The DECA-C
assesses both social-emotional strengths (protective factors) and behavioral concerns.
During the past 4 weeks…
62 Items15-20 minutesTeacher and
Parent Versions
Protective Factor Scales (Initiative, Self-control, and Attachment)
Behavioral Concerns Scales (Attention Problems, Aggression, Withdrawal/ Depression, Emotional Control Problems).
A PROJECT OF SERESC
Implementation Procedures
Systematic screenings are recommended twice a year in October and February/March
In preschools, classroom teachers screen students in their class they have known for at least 30 school days Group administration at a faculty
meeting or training is efficient – allow 1 ½ to 2 hours
A PROJECT OF SERESC
Activity 3: Scientifically Based Screening
Pair Up: Discuss feasibility of using a systematic screening process with colleagues next to you. (10 minutes)
Share Out: (5 minutes)
A PROJECT OF SERESC
Ready for School Success - NH
New Hampshire Center for Effective Behavioral Interventions and Supports – Program-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PW-PBIS)
NH Head Start Programs: Southern NH Services, Inc. (Manchester & Nashua ) & Belknap-Merrimack (Laconia) Head Start Programs
Support for RSS-NH is provided by the U. S. Department of Education Office of Safe and Drug-Free Schools, under the Foundations for Learning Grants Program
READY FOR SCHOOL SUCCESS
NNEE WW HH AAMMPP SS HH II RR EE
A Partnership Between:
A PROJECT OF SERESC
Ready for School Success – NHTHE CHALLENGE
Early childhood educators frequently encounter students who are at risk for school failure because they exhibit challenging behavior or lack the required social-emotional skills for school success.
If not provided with high-quality, effective interventions, many of these students, particularly those with externalizing behaviors, continue onward to experience a negative developmental trajectory through their childhood, adolescent, and adult years.
Despite the overall success of Head Start programs in providing early intervention services to students from low-income households, providing students who are dually at risk with behavior challenges or social-emotional deficits and one or more additional risk associated with Head Start participation factors (e.g., family poverty, developmental delays) with adequate access to evidence-based interventions and supports has remained a major barrier for many young students and their families.
A PROJECT OF SERESC
Ready for School Success – NHOUTCOMES
Improve school readiness of dually at-risk preschoolers attending the Southern New Hampshire Services, Inc. (SNHHS) and Community Action Program Belknap-Merrimack Counties, Inc. Head Start (BMHS) programs
Enhancing child and family access to a linguistically appropriate, culturally competent and sustainable multi-tier continuum of program and community-based social, emotional and behavioral supports (PWPBIS)
Results in measurable gains in student’s emotional, behavioral, and social development and increases in targeted and individualized supports.
A PROJECT OF SERESC
Ready for School Success – NHSCREENING
Ages and Stages Questionnaire: Social Emotional Development (ASQ-SE)
Each fall, the students were screened for risk by both teachers and parents using the ASQ-SE
Fall 2011 indicated 26% (66 of 257) of students at SNHS and 41% (23 of 56) of students at BMHS were screened at risk by either their teachers or parents. Parents generally rated their children as more at risk. For example at BMHS, three times as many children were rated at risk by their parents than their teachers.
A PROJECT OF SERESC
Ready for School Success – NHSUPPORTING Dually-At-RISK
STUDENTS
Dually at risk if (a) qualified for Head Start participation, as indicated by enrollment in one of the participating Head Start locations, and (b) fell within the at-risk range on the ASQ-SE.
The project was very successful in providing additional services to students who were identified as at-risk 88% having received Tier II and/or Tier III
interventions depending on need and response to interventions (Some parents refused services or supports).
A PROJECT OF SERESC
ASQ:SE Results Fall 2010BM-HS DATA
NOW
WHAT?
Total # Children Screened: 56
Total Typical Risk: 35 (62.5%)
Total Elevated: 21 (37.5%)
Elevated Teacher Scores: 6 (11%)
Elevated Parent Scores: 15 (27%)
Elevated in Both: 4 (7%)
A PROJECT OF SERESC
PW-PBIS Big Idea
Data-based decision making requires commitment to a consistent and effective data collection and decision making process to attain positive child and program outcomes
A PROJECT OF SERESC
“Insanity is engaging in the same process over and over, and expecting different outcomes.”
Albert Einstein
A PROJECT OF SERESC
Who should participate in Tier 2 Interventions?
Universal Teaching strategies are geared toward the entire program, and apply to all classrooms
Targeted Group Interventions are for children who are NOT responding to the universal system and require more support to be successful
Includes children either from a classroom or across multiple classrooms that need additional social-emotional support
Tier 2: Secondary Prevention in ECE
Explicit instruction in emotional literacy skills, controlling impulses and anger and friendship-making skills is provided to small groups of children.
Research indicates that systematic efforts to promote children’s social competence can have both preventive and remedial effects.
Sources: Fox, Dunlap, Hemmeter, Joseph & Strain, 2003; Webster-Stratton & Reid (2004)
Social & Emotional Teaching Strategies
A PROJECT OF SERESC
Create Process for Implementing Targeted
Group Interventions
Identify which children need TGI
Identify the primary skill deficitsAssign child to appropriate
intervention based on his/her needs
Identify who will implement the targeted group support
Identify what to teach, where, when, & how
A PROJECT OF SERESC
Dually At Risk Children Reassessed After Social Skills InstructionAges & Stages Questionnaire: Social-Emotional (ASQE –SE) – Teacher Rating Only
Improved; Did Not ImproveTeacher Rating of Skill Improvement
Significantly Improved; Partially Improved; Did Not ImproveCreative Curriculum
Significantly Improved; Did Not Improve
Core Head Start Program &
Monitor ProgressN=20
Children with Elevated Teacher Rating Only (n=4 = 7%)
All 39 Children Nominated for Social Skills Instruction (12 lessons) Receive Social Skills Instruction
Complete Social Skills InstructionDECA Completed
Incident Data Collected
All Head Start Funded Children Screened within 45 Days by Teachers & Parents
Ages & Stages Questionnaire: Social-Emotional (ASQE –SE)(n=59)
READY FOR SCHOOL SUCCESS-NEW HAMPSHIRE 2011-12 BEHAVIOR SUPPORT CONTINUUM FOR DUALLY AT-RISK CHILDREN ATTENDING BELKNAP-MERRIMACK HEAD START AT LACONIA
Children Screened as Dually At Risk (29 of 59 = 49%)Children Without Elevated Teacher or Parent Ratings (30 of 59 =
51%)Ages & Stages Questionnaire: Social-Emotional (ASQE –SE)
Children with Elevated Parent Rating Only (n=15 = 25%)
Children with Elevated Teacher and Parent Ratings (n=10= 17%)
Parents of Dually At Risk Children Nominated for Parent Skills Group(once per week for six weeks)
attend and complete Parent Skills Group
Parents of Dually At Risk Children for Who Complete Parent Skills GroupAssess Skills/Dispositions with Pre-Post Self-Assessment
Parent Stress InventoryParents Rate Their Child Ages & Stages Questionnaire: Social-Emotional
(ASQE –SE)
Dually At Risk Children Who Did Not Respond Nominated for Big Bs Card__ Begin Big B Program Daily in May
Monitor Progress
Teacher Nominations without Elevated Ratings on Either (n=10 =
17%)
A PROJECT OF SERESC
56
RSS-NH Tiered Interventions
Tier 1 Core Instruction at Head Starts
Tier 2 Continuum Social Skills Group
Instruction Teacher Check Connect
and Expect Parent Education Classes
Tier 3 Individualized Behavior Plans
A PROJECT OF SERESC
57
RSS-NH: Social Skills InstructionAdapted from Center on Social
Emotional Foundations for Early Learning
One time per week group 30 minutes4-6 children12 lessons in 2011-12 Samples
1 )I was so mad!Goal: To increase emotional literacy; learn to express feelings in healthy ways, to increase problem solving2) How am I feeling?Goal: To increase emotional literacy and to help children begin to understand the mind body connection, increase empathy3) What could you do to help?Goal: To increase problem solving skills, develop theory of mind and sense of altruism, and increase personal responsibility4) What might happen?
Goal: To increase understanding of cause and effect; and problem solving5) Stop light/ solutions kit.
Goal: To teach and practice problems solving steps.
?
1. What is my problem?
3. What would happen if…?Would it be safe? Would it be fair?
How would everyone feel?4. Give it a try!
2. Think, think, think of some solutions
Problem Solving Steps
Frustrated
Embarrassed
Frustrated Sad
Mad
Learning Self Control
Recognizing that anger can interfere with problem solving
Learning how to recognize anger in oneself and others
Learning how to calm downUnderstanding appropriate ways to
express anger
Turtle Technique
Recognize
that you
feel angry.
“Think”
Stop.
Go into shell. Take 3 deep breathes. And think calm, coping thoughts.
Come out of shell when calm and think of a solution.
A PROJECT OF SERESC
62
Teacher Check, Connect and Expect
Mann and Muscott (2007); Adapted from Cheney (2006)
Teacher Check, Connect and Expect is an efficient, early, & systematic response for students not responding to primary prevention systems of behavior support.
Occurs prior to implementing more sophisticated & less efficient secondary supports.
TCCE is a procedure in which classroom teachers provide higher rates of feedback & attention to ‘at-risk’ students for exhibiting expected classroom behaviors linked to school-wide expectations
TCCE allows for a systematic monitoring of student behavior using data-based decision-making.
Offers an immediate and low effort approach whereby teachers: greet child at the beginning of the day review their behavior on a daily chart based
on classroom schedule & established expectations
provide feedback and encouragement at each checkpoint & the end of the day
Teacher Check, Connect & ExpectMann and Muscott (2007)
The Potential Benefits of Involvement in TCCE
1. Provides increased positive teacher-child contacts before relationship is damaged by repetitious conflict (builds relationship)
2. Provides increased reinforcement to the child for following expectations (builds self-esteem, self-worth)
3. Provides increased home-school communication and partnership (daily feedback to family)
4. Provides an early, effective and efficient response to emerging problem behavior before it becomes chronic and engrained
Potential Benefits of Involvement in Teacher Check Connect Expect
5. Connects logically and easily to program-wide system of behavior support
6. Provides an efficient and measurable assessment of progress that helps determine if interventions are working
7. Provides information that may be useful for identification of predictors of behavior should more supports be needed.
8. Data can be entered in BIRCHIS™
Teacher:_______________ ___
Classroom:______________ ___
Name:_________________ ____
Date:______________ ________
I earned _______ Green Lights
(Optional _______ of 28)
Be Safe Be Kind
Be Careful with Our Things Make it Better
Arrival
Breakfast
Circle
Free Choice/Play
Small Group Activities
Outdoor Play
Lunch
Tomorrow is a new day. I will try again tomorrow.
Updated 10-20-11
A PROJECT OF SERESC
Name:_______________ Today is:_____________
I earned ____ Green Lights
(Optional ____ of 7)
Be Safe
Wait Safely with Adult
Sit Down & Buckle Up
Stay in Seat
Hands and Feet to Self
Quiet Voice
Wait for Bus to Stop
Un- buckle
Tomorrow is a new day. I will try again tomorrow.
Updated 10-20-11
A PROJECT OF SERESC
Ready for School Success – NHPARENT EDUCATION
38 participating parents attended 6-8 week parenting classes (70% or more of classes)
Used the Center on the Social Emotional Foundations for Early Learning curriculum, an empirically validated, widely recognized program
Focused on strengthening parenting competencies and fostering parents’ involvement in children’s school experiences in order to promote children’s academic, social, and emotional competencies and reduce conduct problems
A PROJECT OF SERESC
Ready for School Success – NHPARENT EDUCATION
Care was taken to avoid time-related conflicts that might preclude attendance, such as scheduling the parent training during non-traditional hours to better accommodate working families’ schedules.
Reimbursement was offered for transportation costs (e.g., taxi/bus fare or fuel consumption) to and from the group location.
Language translation services during the skills group were offered to parents whose primary language was not English.
Child-care services or reimbursement were offered to participating parents to cover the parenting skills group scheduled meeting time.
A PROJECT OF SERESC
Ready for School Success – NHChild GAINS
91.4% of the 47 students who were identified as at-risk by teacher ratings exhibited an improvement of 15% or greater on the ASQ-SE.
Additionally, students who exhibited improvement typically exceeded the cut-off point of 15% by a wide margin, with an average improvement of 45.6% in 2010-11, and 57.1% in 2011-12.
By the project’s end, 44.6% of students whose teacher ratings had indicated elevated risk now fell in the typical risk category
A PROJECT OF SERESC
Ready for School Success – NH CHILD GAINS
Incident data on challenging behaviors was collected on 32 at-risk students from the two Head Starts during the winter and spring of school year 2011-12.
Twelve students had no documentable behavioral incidents during the data collection period and as a result were considered successful.
In addition 14 students reduced the number of behavioral incidents by at least 25%. All told, 26 of 32 students were successful in meeting the performance measure.
A PROJECT OF SERESC
Ready for School Success – NHPARENT GAINS
Parent survey responses to the parenting class indicated high levels of satisfaction, with parents reporting increased confidence in their ability to build a positive relationship with their child, to figure out reasons their child acts as he or she does, and to have clear expectations and house rules.
Parents also indicated that they were more likely to actively engage in teaching social skills and to use different strategies to promote positive behavior, and that they would be likely to recommend the training to other parents.
A PROJECT OF SERESC
Ready for School Success – NHPARENTAL STRESS
Parenting Stress Index – Short Form (PSI-SF)
Average decline in total parental stress in parents who participated in the training at Belknap-Merrimack Head Start Pre-test percentile ranking of
75.7% (average raw score, 90.5) Post-test percentile ranking of
53.1% (average raw score, 75.5).
A PROJECT OF SERESC
Ready for School Success – NH
PARENT EDUCATIONParticipation in parent education
programs was associated with improvements in student behavior and development.
8 children at SNHHS identified as at-risk on the ASQ-SE teacher rating scale and whose parents participated in the education programs
Showed an average improvement of 26% in teacher ratings of social emotional development by the conclusion of the education program