Upload
tanner-robbins
View
32
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
A reanalysis of single photon data at CERN SPS. Charles Gale McGill University , Montreal. in collaboration with Rupa Chatterjee , D. K. Srivastava , & S. Jeon. Electromagnetic Probes. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Electromagnetic Probes
Different processes: different characteristic spectra
A jet passing through QGP
Penetrating probes are emitted at all stages then survive unscathed (e <<s). “Historians” of the heavy ion collision: encode all sub-processes at all times
Photons are result of convolutions of the emissions from the entire history of the nuclear collision, so we need rates & a model for evolution.
• Hydrodynamics.• Cascades.• Fire-balls.• Cascade+Hydro.
E
Rate
Hadron Gas Thermal Tf
QGP Thermal Ti
“Pre-Equilibrium”?
Jet Re-interaction √(Tix√s)
pQCD Prompt x√s
“New”
Upper Limit of Single Photons, WA80
Ruled out hadronic gas with limited hadrons: Srivastava and Sinha, PRL 73 (1994) 2421;
Dumitru et al., PRC 51 (1995) 2166.
Sollfrank et al., Lee & Brown, Arbex et al., .
Cleymans, Redlich, & Srivastava, PRC 55 (1997) 1431.However, nhad >> 2-3 /fm3 ! For No Phase Transition.
Pb+Pb@SPS
Srivastava & Sinha, PRC 64, 034902 (2001).
Alam et al., PRC 63, 021901 (2001)Huovinen et al., PLB 535, 109 (2002).Turbide et al., PRC 69, 014903 (2004).
Prompt photons using NLO pQCD and comparison with experimental data
Iso-spin corrected prompt photons at different collider energies as function of xT.
Iso-spin as well as shadowingcorrected prompt photons at different energies.
Shadowing and iso-spin corrected prompt photons using NLO pQCD at sNN = 17.3 GeV, which corr-esponds to the nucleon nucleon centre of mass energy for the WA98 experiment.
),,(),,(),(
yxdxdyyxyxdxdyf
f
Flow patterns
T
Teff
vvT
11
Effective temperature :
Results differ marginally
beyond 1 fm/c.
Central collision. from 0.2 to 1.0 fm/c.
Time evolution of temperature
Energy density
Radial flow velocityTime evolution of average effective temperature
Total entropy & net baryon fixed for all 0.
Sources: Electromagnetic radiation from QCD
First approaches:
McLerran, Toimela (1986); Kajantie, Kapusta, McLerran, Mekjian (1986)Baier, Pire, Schiff (1988); Altherr, Ruuskanen (1992)
Rates diverge: 2~ ln( / 0)s T q
HTLresummation
Going to two loops: Aurenche, Kobes, Gelis, Petitgirard (1996)
Aurenche, Gelis, Kobes, Zaraket (1998)
Co-linear singularities:2
22
~s sth
T
m
AMY, Arnold, Moore, and Yaffe, JHEP 12, 009 (2001); JHEP 11, 057 (2001): incorporates LPM; photon rates complete to leading order in αs
Can be expressed in terms of the solution to a linear integral equation
Hadrons from the confined sector: a similar treatment
Single
photon,
Pb+Pb@SPS
0-10% most
central.
WA98
Centrality
dependent
Hydrodynamics
with well tested
EOS.
Quantitative
explanation of
the data by
multiplying
prompt yield
with a K factor
(Cronin effect ?)
0 (fm) K
0.2 2.7
0.4 4.8
0.6 5.4
0.8 5.7
1.0 5.9
0 = 1.0 fm/c0 = 0.2 fm/c
0 = 0.8 fm/c0 = 0.6 fm/c0 = 0.4 fm/c
Spectra and elliptic flow parameter v2 for pions from Pb+Pb collisions having b = 7 fm @ CERN SPS for different initial times keeping entropy fixed.
spectra are flatter for smaller 0. For pT 1 GeV, spectra are indifferent to change in 0.
Elliptic flow of is insensitive to the initial thermalization time. similar results are observed for other hadrons.
Thermal photon
v2 for different 0.
Results for
photons from
hadronic matter
are also given.
v2 for single
photons. Results for pT
< 2.15 GeV
are obtained by
arbitrarily using the
normalizing factor
at pT = 2.15 GeV.
pT dependent elliptic flow at different 0
Summary & conclusions Single photon data from relativistic collisions of Pb
nuclei @ CERN SPS (measured by WA98) have been re-analyzed.
Iso-spin and shadowing corrected NLO pQCD treatment is used for prompt photon production along with an optimized scale for factorization, renormalization, and fragmentation.
For thermal part centrality dependent hydrodynamic model with a well tested EOS has been used considering a set of initial thermalization times.
The data can be explained well at different 0 using varying multiplicative factors for prompt photons.
Photon v2 is sensitive to initial thermalization time and can be used to estimate the value of 0.
Thank you