A Review of Literatures on Current Zakat Issues: An Analysis

International Review of Research in Emerging Markets and the Global Economy (IRREM)

An Online International Research Journal (ISSN: 2311-3200)

2015 Vol: 1 Issue 2

336

www.globalbizresearch.org

A Review of Literatures on Current Zakat Issues:

An Analysis between 2003 - 2013

FUADAH JOHARI,

Faculty of Economics and Muamalat,

Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia (USIM),

Malaysia.

E-mail: [email protected]

AHMAD FAHME MOHD ALI,



Malaysia.


MUHAMMAD RIDHWAN AB. AZIZ,



Malaysia.


_____________________________________________________________________________

Abstract

The objective of this article is to analyze the related literatures on zakat between 2003 until

2013. The methodology of this article is through qualitative research based on content-analysis

on previous articles and literatures that specifically discuss about zakat between 2003 until

2013. This study looked at several variables which number of publication by year, subject areas,

and a brief content analysis of zakat issues such as management, collection, distribution and

poverty alleviation on zakat. This is important in order to examine its prospects for research in

the future. The general finding of this article shows that there are a lot of issues pertaining to

zakat management, collection, distribution and poverty alleviation program were published for

this timeframe. Henceforth, this article provides significant suggestions and strategies for the

future exploration on zakat.

_____________________________________________________________________________

Keywords: Zakat Management, Zakat Collection, Zakat Distribution, Zakat Issues, Poverty,

Islamic Finance.

mailto:[email protected]



2015 Vol: 1 Issue 2

337


1. Introduction

The literal meaning of zakat can be defined as grow, blessing, pure, good and renowned.

Therefore, Zakat is one of the pillars of faith in Islam that emphasizes the socio-economic development.

Thus, any discussion on zakat in the context of worship usually associated with the socio-economic

factor, especially in aiding the underprivileged based on the Maslahat (society) concept (al-Qardhawi,

2000). Further, its purpose is to redistribute wealth of the society among the poor by providing a certain

amount from a specific wealth (non-poor) for the benefit of those who are entitled to receive it as

stipulated by Allah s.w.t. (Ibn. Qudamah, 1968; Ahmad, A., 1984, p.4). There are eight prescribed

categories of the recipients of Zakat. Allah s.w.t has determined these categories when He says:

“Sadaqat (zakat) are for the poor and the needy, and those employed to administer (the Zakat), for those

whose hearts are to be won over (Muallafat-al-Qulub), and for the freeing of human beings from

bondage, and (for) those who are burdened with debts, and (for every struggle) in Allah’s cause, and

(for) the wayfarer: (this is) an ordinance from Allah, Allah is All-Knowing, full of Wisdom.” (9:60)1

Islam establishes the zakat as a compulsory charity tool that can be used to enhance the

development of the eight categories of recipients (Al-Quran, 9:60). From eight categories of them, five

are meant for poverty eradication such as the poor, the needy, the debtors, the slaves (release them from

captivity), and the travellers in need. Others are the zakat administrative, 'those whose hearts are made

inclined' (to Islam), and in the way of Allah. Although these eight categories of recipients have been

mentioned in the Qur'an, but the first priority in the use of zakat funds has to be accorded to the

alleviation of poverty through assistance to the poor and the needy (Hassan, M. K. 2007, p.28).

2. Literature Review

Zakat conceptually can be defined as, a compulsory levy imposed on Muslim after fulfilling 1)

minimum value required for zakat (nisab) and 2) evaluated after completing 1 Islamic year (1 Haul)

which is about 355 days, as wealth redistribution mechanism from the comparatively well-to-do members

of the Muslim Society to the destitute and needy (Bakar, N and Rahman, 2007, p.30). Zakat has several

meanings according to literary term; it means blessing, growth, development, purity, and neatness (Razak,

M. I. M., Ismail, M., & Hamzah, A. S. A. 2013, p.141). Economically, based on the study being done by

Ahmad (2008, p.92), zakat in theory will result in economic prosperity as Zakat is paid from those who

have surplus, to the poor. So that, this will improve and enhance the poor‟s purchasing power which may

lead to a higher demand on goods.

The institutions of zakat are among several instruments instituted by Islam to combat and

enhance welfare in the society. Zakat helps to generate a flow of funds and recruit the necessary

manpower. The word zakat means growth, cleanness and purity in Arabic (Hassan, M. K. 2007, p.28).

1 The Holy Al-Qur‟an



2015 Vol: 1 Issue 2

338


Zakat also play its role as a fiscal mechanism, zakat performs some of the major functions of modern

public finance, which deals with social security entitlements, social assistance grants for childcare, food

subsidy, education, health care, housing, and public transportation in a welfare state (Yusoff et.al 2012,

p.449). Besides that, zakat creates a balanced growth cycle. When a certain percentage of one‟s wealth is

spent annually over the foregoing eight categories as prescribed in the Qur‟an, zakat has a significant

economic impact on society (Tarar et.al, 2012, p.153). Income support provided to the poor and needy

would result in a measured increase of the money supply in the economy causing upward shift in demand

for goods and services. To support this upward shift in the demand for basic necessities of life such as

food, clothing and shelter, the production facilities would gradually expand and begin to absorb the idle

capital. In order to support the increased production, the economy would generate more jobs and new

employment opportunities. This added employment in turn would generate more demand for goods and

services, more room for additional investments, and finally, the growth cycle based on balance

consumption would contribute to a balance economic growth (Muhammad Ridhwan Ab. Aziz, 2012).

3. Methodology

This article adopts content analysis based on several literatures on zakat issues for ten years

between 2003 and 2013. The arrangement will be based on thematic according to the issues and the

chronological review from 2003 and 2013. 108 articles had been gathered based on online Google

Scholar search on related articles. The review focuses specifically on the articles written in the areas of

zakat. It follows that the articles would be classified into four categories namely zakat management, zakat

collection, zakat distribution and poverty. The articles would be classified into four categories namely

zakat management, zakat collection, zakat distribution and poverty. The classifications are made based on

either the content or the abstract of the articles. It is noted that some areas might overlap due to different

nature and research interest of the specified journals. Therefore, this review would categorize the article

based on these criteria: most frequent mention of key words and also content inclined towards categories

of zakat management, zakat collection, zakat distribution and poverty.

4. Results

4.1 Number of Publications by Year

There were 108 articles published which were related to zakat from the observed 10 years period.

Table 1 presents the distribution of articles by year. It shows that the number of articles published per

year varies from 5 to 17, and most articles published in the year 2012. The least article was published

during 2010.



2015 Vol: 1 Issue 2

339


Year of Publication Number of Articles Percentage (%)

2003 6 6

2004 8 7

2005 9 8

2006 13 12

2007 7 7

2008 6 6

2009 11 10

2010 5 5

2011 10 8

2012 17 16

2013 16 15

Total 108 100

Table 1: Number of Publications by Year

4.2 Quantitative List by Subject Area of Articles

Table 2 shows the growth of each subject according to the year of publication and subject involved. It

is indicated that articles related to zakat management had been written and published almost every year

(with total of 39 articles from the observed period), followed by Zakat and Poverty with 24 published

articles, zakat collection and Zakat distribution with 22 published articles.

Subject of

Article

Year of Publication

Total

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

Management 4 1 3 10 2 3 4 1 2 5 4 39

Collection 1 2 1 1 4 1 3 2 2 2 4 23

Distribution 0 2 2 0 0 2 3 1 3 5 4 22

Poverty 1 3 3 2 1 1 1 1 3 4 4 24

Total 6 8 9 13 7 7 11 5 10 16 16 108 Table 2: Quantitative List by Subject Area of Articles

5. Discussion on Issues Highlighted

Due to broad coverage of discussion on zakat, this article had categorized the issues into four topics

of discussion which are management of zakat, zakat collection, zakat distribution and, poverty and zakat.



2015 Vol: 1 Issue 2

340


5.1 Issues in Zakat Management

Salim (2003) in his research mentioned that, one of the recent developments indicating the resurgence

of Islam is the growing of Islamic philanthropic and welfare organisations with modern management,

drawing funds from Muslim alms and zakat. The objective of zakat management is to achieve the best

possible outcome in the timely collection and distribution of zakat as ordained in Islamic Shariah

(Rahman et.al 2003, p. 40). Therefore, the efficiency of any system proposed in zakat management must

be assessed in terms of achieving that particular objective in the best possible way (Azeez, 2003, p.32).

The role of zakat organization is to promote social justice and to ensure sustenance of economically

unfortunate sections of the society (Johari, F, 2004, p.). The efficiency of the zakat system cannot be

viewed independently of the extent of trust that zakat payers may assign to it. The whole idea of zakat

management is to help Muslims perform this pillar of Islam and establish its primary function as a means

to alleviate poverty. But if trust is not sufficiently maintained between Muslims and zakat centre, the

potential zakat payers would prefer to pay out zakat directly to their own relatives who are poor or needy,

rather than deal through the zakat centre (Wahid et.al, 2004, p.145).

Like any other non-profit organization, zakat organizations face various kinds of challenges due to

environmental changes in modern societies (Abdul Rahim, 2006, p. 93). Creativity and innovation are

important elements to ensure the relevance of zakat organizations in modern Muslim societies (Mujaini,

2005). According to Abdul Rahim (2006), zakat practitioners need to change their mindset and be opened

to new techniques in administering zakat (Abdul Rahim, 2006, p. 95). Al-Qardhawi (1999) indirectly

recommended that zakat practitioners must be creative and innovative in facing new challenges such as

changing needs and modern demands. Zakat administrators must ensure that the concept of ijtihad

(diligence) should be incorporated in their management of zakat funds (Mujaini, 2005). Innovations on

worldly affairs and ijtihad in the context of zakat must be part of their management practice (Abdul

Hamid, 2003, p.96; Mujaini, 2005). In the modern management of zakat, practitioners must be

knowledgeable for them to look at creativity and innovation as something that can assist them to achieve

the objectives of zakat.

According to Ahmad et.al (2005) the satisfaction on zakat distribution is positively correlated to the

zakat compliant behaviour. He also found that zakat compliant between states are varies, implying that

states possess different capabilities and performance in zakat management (Ahmad et.al, 2005, p. 63).

Prime implication of this study is that in order to raise zakat compliant towards formal institution, effort

for abolishing negative perception towards formal institution should be the prime agenda of zakat centre.

Another problem that has been recognized in Malaysian zakat institutions is the shortage of staff and

experts in the zakat institutions relative to the numerous tasks under their responsibilities. This limitation

may lead to inefficiency and ineffectiveness of zakat management performed or in other words under

potential performance by the zakat institutions (Sadeq; 1995; Masudul Alam Choudhury & Sofyan Syafri



2015 Vol: 1 Issue 2

341


Harahap, 2008, p.615). This happened because of several problems including lack of management

expertise, lack of commitment, lack of information and legal aspects.

On the other hand, Ahmad (2006) examines the factors that influence the individual dissatisfaction

towards formal institutions in Malaysia. By using primary data, he found out that satisfaction towards the

zakat management significantly influences individual compliance behaviour towards formal institution.

He found out that 57% of 753 respondents were not satisfied with the current distribution of zakat in

Malaysia which significantly affect their payment of zakat to zakat institutions. The result indicates that

to attract more people to formal institutions, they should first increase the individual satisfaction. This can

be done by constantly improving zakat management, maintaining good will, becoming more transparent

and conducting more productive distribution scheme (Ahmad, 2006, p. 181).

Many studies urged that to implement the zakat localization as a potential public policy, a consensus

must be collected from the particular group that are the zakat recipients (asnaf) and zakat collectors (amil)

because these two groups are the grass root support to the zakat system. Muhammad Syukri (2002) urged

the implementation the concept of localization. His argument is based on several issues. First, the

statistics of zakat distribution in Malaysia show deficiency where most of the zakat fund was not fully

distributed to the zakat recipients. Only around 70 to 75 per cent zakat fund have been distributed in

Malaysia from 2001 until 2007 and almost 25 to 30 per cent were left idle. The significant reasons

referring to the problem were the emerging connection gap between zakat institution and zakat recipients.

Bureaucracy problems also happen in zakat application procedure and finally are the geographical

problem where potential zakat recipients could not be reached and identified by the amil because of their

homes were scattered in the village, district or state. A second issue that may arise from this case is the

payment done by zakat payer through the unofficial channel or in other word the zakat payer is paying

zakat direct to the zakat recipients (Muhammad Syukri, 2002, p. 21).

Consistent with this findings, Wahid et al. (2009) highlighted the issues of transparency and unclear

method of zakat distribution as the main reasons of dissatisfaction towards zakat institutions in Malaysia.

The majority of zakat payers in Malaysia are not satisfied with the way zakat institutions distributed the

zakat; they have felt that the process of distribution is vague and the information regarding to the zakat

distribution is unclear (Wahid et al., 2009, p. 1). Many studies also agreed that the zakat collection should

be disbursed immediately to the recipients and also should not be postponed (Nik Mustapha, 1991) and

without unwanted delay (Khaf, 1995, p. 20 and Mujaini, 1995).

Wahid et. al (2010) investigated the perceptions of zakat recipients (the end user) and the Zakat

Collector (the implementer) on whether localization of zakat distribution would be a possible solution to

address the problem of zakat management in Malaysia. He found out that the process of localization in

the long run could create another good output such as good governance, leading to higher investment in

human capital and social services as the poorest regions of the country chose projects according to their

greatest needs, increasing the democratic accountability of the state and others. In terms of zakat



2015 Vol: 1 Issue 2

342


management, localization could be implemented by forming the local committees in the villages (Wahid

et. al, 2010, p.477). The zakat could be distributed closely to the zakat recipients especially the poor and

needy group and also other zakat recipients such as Fi Sabilillah (in the cause of Allah), Ibn Sabil

(wayfarer), Al-Riqab (slave) and others who could be recognized. It is learnt that this action could

increase awareness amongst the zakat payers and will also increase their satisfaction to make a zakat

payment through official channel. This will boost their confidence to pay zakat through zakat institution

and finally the zakat collection will be increased year by year. It will give a huge benefit to the zakat

recipients in the future (Bakar et.al, 2011, p.243). The main advantage is the local government could

easily distribute the goods and services to the local residents, provides citizens with the public goods and

services that they desire, able to target different bundles of public goods to different regions, because they

are close to the local people. It is interesting to note that the basic pillar of efficient zakat management

mentioned in the Quran is the class of zakat workers, not the head of State or ruler, even though the latter

are necessary for facilitating the activity of zakat workers (Suhaib et.al, 2009, p.316).

Meanwhile Hudayati (2010) support the centralizing zakat management due to strategic impact that

zakat centre enjoys through this strategy. By having it centralised, coordination between national zakat

institution and the fiscal policy maker might be implemented more easily. The zakat concept can also be

incorporated into fiscal policy formulated by government. Finally, by having a good and effective

management of zakat it is expected that the conversion of zakat recipients into zakat payers can take place

to indicate that the welfare improvement of the under-privileged segment is guaranteed. For example, the

Malaysia‟s zakat centre had provides interesting learning in term of zakat management by centralising it

at the state level, due to the authoritative power of each state ruler on the religious matter, including zakat.

This approach is very positive to make zakat collection effective and efficient. Further, she also clarifies

the ineffectiveness of centralized strategy. Through this approach the zakat institutions fail to reach those

needy people due to lack of information or worse due to absence of creative distribution management.

Single entity of zakat in each state causes no competition at all. It might imply serious problem in

managing zakat funds. Another potential problem is on how to deal with cross-state collection and

distribution. Centralising zakat institution at state level might also be viewed as decentralising at federal

level (Hudayati, 2010, p. 371).

Furthermore, it is very important for zakat organization to improve organizational members‟ learning

capabilities in order to better understand and manage the organization and its environment. Halim et. al

(2011) found out that learning culture elements of commitment to learning, knowledge sharing, and open

mindedness were embedded among staff of Lembaga Zakat Selangor (LZS)2. Some poverty alleviation

projects undertaken have been successful. However, the lack of learning and knowledge in managing and

monitoring projects awarded to aptitude deficiency beneficiaries, have led to many programmes‟ failure.

2 Selangor Zakat Centre



2015 Vol: 1 Issue 2

343


The finding also reveals that the lack of knowledge and attitude of zakat beneficiaries too contributes

significantly to the success and failure of zakat assistance package. Some zakat beneficiaries are now

zakat payers but most are still zakat dependence despite they have been receiving the assistance for more

than a decade (Halim et. al, 2011, p. 47). Thus, the role of the zakat centre in the collection and

dissemination of zakat must be appreciated along the same rationale of intermediary services, which

brings together suppliers and demanders of a particular product or service efficiently (Bakar et.al, 2011, p.

237; Duka, 2013, p.138).

Suhaili Sarif (2014) found out that apparent from the usual collection and disbursement procedures,

the zakat centre did not have sufficient knowledge to administer and utilize the fund effectively (Suhaili

Sarif, 2014, p. 6). This situation, indirectly, suggests that the collection and disbursement of zakat during

this era was considered purely from the religious point of view, as a means of enabling Muslims to fulfil

their obligations. Zakat centre, at that time, had yet to realize the potential of the fund beyond the

religious perspective, especially in the economic sphere. In addition, there were many weaknesses, such

as the lack of reports and systematic records (Ahmad et.al, 2006, p.194). Zakat centre seldom disclosed

collection and disbursement statistics, or released periodic information as to what had been done with the

zakat money. This is actually not surprising, considering that the Zakat centre themselves did not have a

clue as to how to administer the fund effectively. Once the money reached the council offices, it was

normally kept in the council‟s account without being fully distributed (Ahmad et.al, 2005, p.57).

Finally, issues in zakat management can be briefly looking at the shift in the current practice of zakat,

the role of duty has been expanded beyond the religious perspective. The fund has been managed in such

a way as managing a business entity. In the disbursement aspect, it seems that the newly corporatized

bodies have to find the best way to persuade people to pay. The fund is also perceived as a tool in poverty

eradication and economic development. The study reveals that there is a general misconception of zakat,

as indicated in several standards and guidelines, which has consequently resulted in inappropriateness in

their proposed corporate zakat recognition and measurement and hence presentations. These inaccuracies,

in one way or another, have not been in line with the true spirit of zakat in Islam. Thus, some

unfavourable consequences may and in fact have already been implicated on the larger Muslim

community as a result (Muhammad et.al, 2009, p.9).

5.2 Issues in Zakat Collection

Ahmed (2004) estimates the potential of zakat collection and resource required for poverty alleviation

for a sample of 24 Islamic Development Bank (IDB) member countries by using a $1/day and $2/day

international poverty lines. He found that, at one extreme, Tunisia required only 0.3 per cent and 1.4 per

cent of its GDP for the alleviation of extreme poverty while at other extreme, Nigeria required huge

amount that is 107.7 per cent and 149.6 per cent of GDP respectively for poverty alleviation. Shirazi et. al

(2010) estimates the resources required and potential zakat collection for poverty elimination in 38 OIC

members countries. He found out that half of the sample countries not only meet their resources shortfall



2015 Vol: 1 Issue 2

344


by potential zakat collection but also generate surplus funds which sufficient for the resource deficit

countries. He suggest that pooling of zakat funds from zakat surplus countries is needed because its

providing for resource deficit countries to eliminate the poverty (Shirazi et. al. 2010, p. 69). In calculating

the potential of zakat, Zarqa (2002) comes with estimation of the potential zakat proceeds in a

contemporary Islamic economy at about 3 per cent to 3.6 per cent of the GDP. He expresses reservation

on the possibility of using the extent of the coverage of zakat collection as a policy tool. He further argues

that the disbursement, mix ratio, cash mix ratio, the equilibrium share of other claims, and the dates of

collection and disbursement, all of which can be used as a controlling tools of fiscal policy since there is

nothing which prevents that in shariah.

Shirazi (2006) attempts to estimate the resource shortfall and potential zakat collection for poverty

elimination in the low‐income Muslim countries. He estimates the resource shortfall by utilizing the

international poverty lines (under USD 1 and 2) headcount and poverty gap index estimated by the World

Bank. Potential zakat collection has been estimated by utilizing Kahf's definitions of zakatable items with

some modifications. The study finds that some of the low‐income Muslim countries can meet their

resource gap under USD 1 international poverty line with potential zakat collection. However, other

countries, mostly belonging to Africa, cannot meet their resources shortfall from their potential zakat

collection (Shirazi, 2006, p. 17).

Yaumidin (2009) estimates the resource needed for poverty alleviation and potential zakat collection

for Malaysia and Indonesia. She concludes that Malaysia performs better than Indonesia. She replicates

the methodology employed by Ahmad (2004) which suffers the same shortcoming as discussed above.

Hassan and Khan (2007) find that zakat fund can largely facilitate the government budgetary expenditure

and support the poor through transfer of payment in Bangladesh. By allocating funds into eight groups of

zakat recipient, it is possible to increase the income and employment with the improvement of safety net

programmes. Zakat funds can increase the tax potential of the government through the improvement of

productivity, employment and output. They conclude that Zakat funds can replace the government

budgetary expenditures ranging from 21 per cent of ADP (annual development plan) in 1983-84 to 43 per

cent of ADP in 2004-2005. These funds can be used for other developmental and social expenditures.

They suggested that zakat should be included, for Bangladesh and rest of the Muslim countries, as a

poverty alleviation instrument in their PRSP (Hassan and Khan, 2007, p.27).

It has been emphasized that in Islam, the primary motivation of paying zakat should be the worship

(ta’abudi) factor. Muda et.al (2009) investigates the factors affecting individual decisions in zakat

contribution hence provide an understanding of their motivation. He indicates that participation in zakat is

not only motivated by religious factor but also self-satisfaction and organizational factors. The

implication is that the efforts to raise the level of zakat activities should emphasise not only the religious

aspect but also the individual‟s and organizational dimensions (Muda et.al. 2009, p.9). This may have

significant impacts on the personal financial planning and development of Islamic economic systems in



2015 Vol: 1 Issue 2

345


general. Reinstein (2006) supported worship factor as one of the main motivations that contributes to the

compliance of zakat, sadaqa (donation) and other prosaically behaviour (ijtima’i). He further claimed that

the act of paying zakat could be an indicator of high level of iman (faith). This is because individual

compliance towards religious obligation to pay zakat is highly dependent on his belief of the religious

teaching. Apart from the worship factor, the individuals‟ level of understanding on Islamic principles will

also motivates people to comply the injunction to pay zakat. Lastly he also identified that religious belief

as an important determinant of religious and secular giving.

Muhammad Firdaus et.al. (2012) found out that Muslims who pay zakat on both periods monthly and

annually have a stronger faith, appreciation, altruism, and self‐appreciation. The place of choice to pay

the zakat/alms also affects the respondents‟ choice to pay the zakat on a monthly basis. The respondents

who pay zakat to formal institutions have a good judgment of the organization‟s performance. But there is

almost no significant difference between the perceptions of those who pay their zakat to formal or

informal institutions. Therefore, he estimates the total of zakat potential in Indonesia and explores the

relationship between demographic characteristics and zakat payment. The results show that total of all

zakat potential in Indonesia from various sources is approximately 217 trillion rupiah. This number is

equal to 3.4% of Indonesia‟s 2010 GDP. The study shows that education, occupation and income are

important factors which influence respondent‟s frequency and choice of place when paying zakat and

alms.

In addition, the new approach to fund collection has incorporated many ways of modern transaction,

such as Internet banking and other financial facilities. Such new practices are actually associated with the

business strategy where the zakat centre needs to have a corporate link with many financial institutions

(Suhaili et.al. 2009). To accomplish the strategy, it appears that the zakat centres have to think beyond

religion, treating the fund as a type of secular taxation in which people must be persuaded rather than

hoping they will willingly fulfil their own obligation (Suhaili et.al. 2009, p.495). As this zakat collection

is treated as a positive redistribution mechanism to improve socio-economic impact to the society.

5.3 Issues in Zakat Distribution

The traditional practice of zakat distribution in the form of cash payment will basically not help the

recipients, especially in the long term (Ahmed, Habib, 2004). Zakat beneficiaries are more likely to spend

most of the distributed wealth for the consumption as according to Qureshi, these groups have high

propensity to consume where there will be nothing spare for them to generate income (Qureshi, D. M.,

1989, p.41). Rahman also reminds that such a disbursement may also create a permanent class of

dependants with no motivation to work (Rahman, Afzalur, 1986). Hence, the traditional practice of giving

zakat in the form of monthly dole or in daily necessities should be limited to those who have no power of

sustenance, as such a distribution, according to Ahmed, will only manage to fulfil the basic necessities

without significantly changing the living standard of the recipient. He also further mentions that any



2015 Vol: 1 Issue 2

346


ttempt to treat productive recipients like an unproductive one will only result in the poverty persisting

continuously (Ahmed, Habib, 2004).

Response to this issues, Parid (2001) suggests that zakat distribution must acquire at least a level of

sufficiency and comfort living for the recipient and his dependents. The distribution must be in certain

proportion that ensures continuity of quality life where the impact of the distribution is that the recipient

must obtain certain standard of living. Standard of living here means attaining the level of mobilizing

basic essentials (daruriyyat) and comfort (hajiyyat). Othman al- Habshi (1990; 1998; 2006) clarifies that

zakat is the most effective means to assist the poor and needy. Islam has often stresses on the believers to

consider the role of zakat seriously, in particular, in improving the lives of the downtrodden. He also

expresses that the proportion of zakat received by the poor should have helped them improve their

standard of living, namely, in fulfilling their daruriyyat and hajiyyat needs which forms as the minimum

of their quality of life. Therefore, the funds received should enable them to enhance their life.

As for the disbursement aspect, the consideration is mostly to utilize zakat as a poverty eradication

mechanism. The current target is not merely relieving the poor temporarily but enriching them instead in

the hope that the recipients will be transformed and become payers (Hassan, 2007, p.27). Hence, the zakat

fund is now being used as an income generation initiative, a modern development approach to release the

poor permanently. The redefinition of recipients and the introduction of new ways of disbursement

alongside the economic perspective of poverty eradication is a step towards the translation of what has

been imagined by the scholars.

The concept of income generation through zakat has never been extensively discussed in any specific

writing (Suhaili et.al. 2009, p.467). There are, however, a number of Muslims economists and Islamic

jurists who propose that zakat should be disbursed in such a way that empowers the recipients and builds

their capability to generate income. Ahmed (2004, p. 64), suggests that zakat distribution should be able

to provide the necessary inputs such as human, physical and financial capital in order to reduce the

poverty of the able bodied group. According to him, specific programs have to be designed to provide

support for skill development, provision of physical capital such as taxis and sewing machines, and

financial capital to start a business so that the poor can be fully employed and earn a living. Afzalur

(1986) also argues that zakat should be used in providing sources of livelihood to the poor and the needy

according to their skills, individual skill and varying needs of different geographical units (Afzalur

Rahman, 1986, p. 260). He also stresses that zakat funds should be used to provide necessary technical

equipment and machinery to artisans and craftsmen. In the meantime, he proposes that cottage industries

should be set up in rural areas where poor villagers who have plenty of free time to be busy with

subsidiary occupations for extra income. He believes that direct cash disbursement will not be effective in

bringing about any better changes to the eligible recipients.



2015 Vol: 1 Issue 2

347


In discussions of the above matter, researchers usually distinguish between productive and

unproductive recipients, where the former refers to able bodied persons and the latter to the incapacitated,

such as the disabled and the elderly (Ahmed, 2003). He said:

“The productive households are poor because they cannot use the full potential of their resources due

to some constraints. These constraints are related to the limited human, physical and financial capital

needed for an economic activity that provides the household a decent income. Thus, the institutions of

zakat and awqaf should be able to provide the necessary inputs like human, physical and financial capital

in order to reduce the poverty for the productive group. Specific programs have to be designed to provide

support for education and skill development, provision of physical capital (like a taxi, sewing machine,

etc), and making financial capital available to start a business so that the poor can be productively

employed and earn a living. For the unproductive members of the society such as elderly, sick, widows,

handicapped, etc., the institutions of zakat and awqaf should be able to provide them with periodic

stipends to afford consumption of the basic needs.”

From the above statement, it can be concluded that a productive recipient is one who has potential to

earn their living independently despite their limitations. Thus, according to Ahmed, this group must be

facilitated based on their need in order to enhance their capabilities so that they can earn their living

independently. This, however, must be properly managed; a specific program has to be designed to

provide necessary supports such as education, skill developments and financial capital. Differing from the

productive, unproductive recipients such as elderly, sick, widows and disabled must be helped by periodic

stipends with zakat funds disbursed from time to time to fulfil their basic needs (Suhaili, 2009, p.460).

The distribution of zakat funds for helping recipients to yield income is also sometimes classified as

productive in nature as the zakat provision could help recipients to produce something to generate their

income and will not end in itself. For example, Suhaili (2009) uses the term productive fund to refer to the

use of zakat for capital support of the economically weak entrepreneur (Suhaili, 2009, p.461). On the

other hand, in the case of distribution where the recipients will spend the zakat on food and basic

necessities, the disbursement is usually seen as for consumption in purpose.

According to Abdul Rahman and Ahmad (2010), in general zakat distribution method is still focused

on the periodical form of direct payment where asnaf (zakat recipient) is given zakat money monthly or

annually (Abdul Rahman A., 2010, p. 291.). Nevertheless, many cases have shown that direct payments

reducing asnaf‟s incentive to work and end up being dependent on zakat funds. Although direct payment

of zakat is still acceptable especially for non-productive asnafs such as the disabled and elderly, it is

recommended that zakat should be distributed in the form of capital finance to the poor and needy in

order to encourage business activities among asnaf. In a long run, it is expected that the productive asnaf

will be more independent, and able to support themselves and their families, thus escaping from the

poverty (Hayati et.al. 2012). Moreover, in some countries such as Malaysia and Pakistan, zakat funds are

also used to help the household dependants by sponsoring their school and university fees (Ahmed, 2004).



2015 Vol: 1 Issue 2

348


It seems that these educational and training programmes are useful to prevent the asnafs‟ children from

living in poverty in the future due to the lack of knowledge.

The effectiveness of zakat collection and distribution mainly depends on the good governance of

zakat institution. However, distribution of zakat is very significant to the Muslim country and community

especially to eradicate poverty, improve economic growth and also the quality of life (Wahab et.al. 2012,

p.108, Bakar et. al, 2011, p.237; Semerdjian, E. 2010, pp.505). However many studies illustrate that zakat

management reported incidences of negative perceptions from the zakat payers on the management on

zakat funds especially in term of distribution (Sanep et. al 2006, p.270; Syukri, 2002; and Abdul Halim et.

al, 2008, p. 129). If the zakat institution cannot be addressed properly, it could raise negative impact on

the future development of the zakat institution. Indeed, there was a study suggested the zakat institution

should apply the concept of corporate governance in its management (Shawal and Hasan, 2007, p.66).

Saladin et.al. (2011) examines the present poverty measurement practiced by Islamic institutions in

Malaysia. He compared the difference between three monetary variables which are Income, Poverty Line

Index (PLI) and Zakat Poverty Line (ZPL). He found out that these monetary variables are significantly

related with each other. This association could be used by authorities to understand the poverty

phenomenon from an Islamic perspective. However, there are some drawbacks in the monetary approach.

Firstly, the needs of individuals within the same age group is not exactly the same due to the differences

in metabological rate. Secondly, nonmonetary items which reflect the quality of life such as size, type and

ownership of house, education level are not included in the calculation of ZPL and PLI. Due to these

reasons, policy makers and researchers in the developed nations have opted for other approaches such as

capability and social exclusion approaches which are multidimensional in nature that includes non-

monetary indicators. He then proposed a new indicator called Islamic poverty indicator (IPI)

incorporating the various dimensions would have an impact on Islamic institutions as it gives a new

perspective of measuring poverty from a micro perspective. Using methods such as index, the IPI is

envisaged to reflect the multi-dimensional phenomenon of poverty in a more holistic way. Thus, it is

strongly recommended that a study on formulating the IPI to be carried out. This would enhance the

poverty measurement from an Islamic perspective as it comprises of monetary and non-monetary

components using maqasid al-shariah principles (Saladin et. al, 2011, p. 127).

Fuadah et.al. (2013) demonstrates literately the importance of zakat towards the economic

development among new convert. As one of the several instruments by Islam, Zakat is important to

combat and enhance welfare in the society. It also helps to generate a flow of funds and recruit the

necessary manpower (Fuadah et.al. 2013, p.36). She found out that zakat has a significant economic

impact on society mostly on new convert by taking a certain percentage of one‟s wealth is spent annually

over the foregoing eight categories as prescribed in the Qur‟an. Income support provided to the new

convert would result in a measured increase of the money supply in the economy causing upward shift in

demand for goods and services. To support this upward shift in the demand for basic necessities of life



2015 Vol: 1 Issue 2

349


such as food, clothing and shelter, the production facilities would gradually expand and begin to absorb

the idle capital. To support the increased production, the economy would generate more jobs and new

employment opportunities. This added employment would generate more demand for goods and services,

more room for additional investments and finally, the growth cycle based on balance consumption would

contribute to a balance economic growth. This research later been supported with consequence findings,

show that zakat distribution gives positive impact in reducing poverty in unique aspect of the particular

recipients in Malaysia (Johari, F et al, 2014a, p.337) (Johari, F et al, 2014b, p.48) (Johari, F et al, 2015,

p.50).

5.4 Issues in Zakat as a Tool for Poverty Alleviation

According to Kahf (2004), implementation of zakat can provide micro financing to the poor. Zakat

can be given out to the poor for consumption purposes to avoid diversion of funds from production. The

combination of micro financing and zakat funds will make it easier for the poor to break out of the

poverty cycle (Kahf, 2004, p.19). In addition, Islam establishes zakat as a compulsory charity tool that

can be used on eight purposes. Among them, five are meant for poverty eradication such as the poor, the

needy, the debtors, the slaves (to free them from captivity), and the travellers in need. Other heads are the

administrative cost of zakat, 'those whose hearts are made inclined' (to Islam), and in the way of Allah.

Although eight heads for spending Zakat revenue have been mentioned in the Qur'an, there is general

agreement that the first priority in the use of Zakat funds has to be accorded to the alleviation of poverty

through assistance to the poor and the needy (Hassan, M. K., 2006, p.16).

The effectiveness of helping the poor is depends on the method of distribution and also the purpose of

it. This method however, needs to be strengthened and analyzed from time to time so it will serve the

purpose to help the poor to have a better life. The previous research which discussed on the effectiveness

of zakat on poverty reduction strategy focused on several aspects. Hairunizam Wahid. et.al. (2004, p.160)

assess zakat distribution based on the quality of life, Fuadah Johari (2004) viewed this form the effects of

the distribution of the income, while Mujaini Tarimin (2005) also assess the impact of zakat in terms of

income but towards professional management, while Ahmad Fuad Mohammad (2006) evaluated in terms

of income. Patmawati Ibrahim (2010, p.110) viewed this on the pro rata distribution, Nurzaman (2011,

p.15) measures the effectiveness of zakat distribution based on the Human Development Index (HDI) and

Rosbi (2009, p. 60) measure the successful of zakat distribution based on five elements (religion, life,

mind, dignity and wealth).

Mashreque et.al. (2006) revealed that the strength of zakat as a poverty alleviation tool depends on

how much of the prevailing poverty gaps would be financed by zakat proceeds. The strength can be

measured by portion of poverty gap that zakat can finance at rural and urban areas. This rural-urban

segregation does not have any legal implication but it provides insights on the effect of interventions

pursued on regional basis. The information so received may help preparing policies which will encourage

resources to be transferred wherever these would be of best use. It is quite evident that from his study on



2015 Vol: 1 Issue 2

350


poverty alleviation in Bangladesh, zakat collected from rural area can cover only 14.8% of the rural

poverty gap in 1997. The coverage rises over time and becomes 24.7% in 2005. Per capita urban zakat

receipts covers 67% of the urban poverty gap and it increases up to 84.3% by the year 2005. The

extremely low coverage of poverty gap by rural zakat receipts shows severity of rural poverty compared

to urban poverty and the limitation of any poverty alleviation strategy solely based on rural zakat

(Mashreque et.al, 2006, p. 245). This warrants for mitigation strategy with tools beyond zakat with the

necessary condition that the intervention package must be rural biased and ensures net transfer of

resources primarily from the rich to poor and equally from urban to rural.

Yusoff (2006) analyses the potential of zakat as the major fiscal policy instrument in an Islamic State.

Zakat plays its role in the macroeconomic stabilization policy through the non-discretionary and

discretionary policy. The built-in stabilizer mechanism occurs when zakat collection is automatically

reduced during recession giving more money to people to spend which tends stimulate the economy;

while during the boom period more zakat is collected, reducing the ability of the people to spend which

tends to dampen economic activities. These reduce macroeconomic fluctuations. As a discretionary fiscal

policy, the government varies the disbursement of zakat to the recipients whenever necessary during the

phases of the business cycle (Yusoff, 2006, p.141). During the expansion phase of a business cycle, the

government decreases zakat disbursement to reduce aggregate spending. Likewise zakat disbursement is

increased when the economy is in the downswing to increase aggregate spending. Then Yusoff (2010)

provide concrete empirical evidence in support of zakat as a fiscal tool in an Islamic state. Specifically,

his empirical evidence using Malaysian panel data supports the hypothesis that zakat spending is a potent

fiscal instrument to stabilize macroeconomic fluctuations. He suggests that Muslim countries must make

all effort to establish zakat as the major tool for stabilization policy. In order to make this a success, the

zakat collection and zakat spending have to be carried out in the most effective and efficient manner

(Yusoff, 2010, p.158). As long as zakat collection and spending are disorganized we can never achieve

the potential of zakat as an effective fiscal instrument.

M. Kabir Hassan and Juanyed Masrur Khan (2007) estimate the impact of zakat funds on the annual

development plan of Bangladesh. The zakat funds can increase the taxation potential of the government

through the improvement of productivity, employment and output. Further, the implementation of zakat

in Bangladesh has several potential effects on government budgets such as relieving budget categories

targeted for poverty alleviation for other budgetary need, increase the potential of taxation through the

improvement of productivity, employment and output, and also zakat collection can be used as an

important economic policy tools by the government (M. Kabir Hassan and Juanyed Masrur Khan, 2007,

p. 25).

Saiful Azhar Rosly, (2010) explained that zakat plays an important role in a pivotal role in poverty

eradication and income redistribution of the Muslim people and it forms a critical component of public

finance in Islam. Zakat administration in essence deals with the collection of zakat from zakat payers and



2015 Vol: 1 Issue 2

351


distribution of zakat to the eight recipients (asnafs). He explained that the increasing number of

shareholdings by Muslims in business corporations as well as companies using the Islamic label such as

Islamic banks and takaful companies has provide strong basis for a systematic and efficient zakat system

of collection and distribution (Saiful Azhar Rosly, 2010, p. 144).

Dimas Bagus et.al. (2010) study about the power of zakat in poverty alleviation and found out that

zakat can give impact in terms of consumption and investment variable. Thus, the more zakat disbursed to

the recipient, the more in increase the amount of aggregate consumption created into economy (Dimas

Bagus et.al, 2010, p. 420). In spite of in the Islamic economic system, zakat payer will transfer their

excess income or wealth to zakat recipient which indirectly will promote the higher propensity to

consume of zakat recipient. For the zakat payer side, they will reduce the consumption, and turn into

saving/investment activities. However, it finally also will create real economy through investment project

financing or credit instrument.

Further, Hussin and Ahmad (2010) reported that overall, only 6.9% out of 537 respondents that

received capital aid from zakat institutions in Selangor and Kuala Lumpur managed to pass the Had

Kifayah (Zakat Poverty Line) of poverty. The study further explained that the reason behind the high

percentage of failure is mainly due to the amount of capital aid received from the Zakat institutions

(Hussin and Ahmad, 2010, p.5). They found that the percentage of success is highest if the amount of

capital received is sufficient. Furthermore, Wahid et al. (2004) studied on the impacts of zakat to the

quality of life of the Asnafs (recipient) by examining their satisfaction on the zakat received. It was found

that the respondents were generally not satisfied with the zakat distribution as education and social

involvement were the only factors that the respondents were satisfied with relative to other quality of life

variables such as transportation, communication, health, and shelter (Wahid et al. 2004, p.7). Hossain, M.

(2005) looked at how the implementation of the institution of zakat commerce and the merchants. He

presented the problems about the concept, trading systems, receiving alms, division and problems

encountered. The results of the study provide implications for the influence in a commercial

implementation of the charity Muslim region (Hossain, M., 2005, p.17).

Mohamad (2011) examines the impact of zakat spending and education on economic growth using

panel data where the cross-section units are the fourteen states of Malaysia. Education and economic

growth are represented by student enrolment ratio and growth of real GDP of each state (Mohamad, 2011,

p.181). Empirical evidence supports the hypothesis that zakat spending and education are important

determinants of real GDP growth suggesting that they are essential ingredients to be considered in

formulating economic development programs in the Muslim countries. Therefore, Muslim countries must

make all efforts to establish zakat and education as the major ingredients in the development policy. In

order to make this a success, every Muslim country must organize zakat collection and zakat spending in

the most effective and efficient manner.



2015 Vol: 1 Issue 2

352


Several issues highlighted in previous studies on the effectiveness of zakat in alleviating poverty in

Malaysia. Ab. Rahman et al. (2012) highlighted the issues of inefficiency of zakat distribution thus

affecting the objective of combating poverty. They argued that studies found that there were bureaucracy

problems in zakat Institutions (ZI) in Malaysia which slow down the application process such as the

requirement for students to make an application every year to ZI although their application has been

approved during their first year. Besides distribution process, inefficient in collecting zakat has also been

highlighted. For example, the Pusat Pungutan Zakat /MAIWP3 on 2010 report, only 160,000 out of

approximately 2 million Muslims population in Kuala Lumpur (8%) are paying zakat. Md. Ramli et al.

(2011) highlighted the issue of asnaf attitude in receiving capital aid from zakat institution in Malaysia.

They found that some of the recipients of the capital aid did not possess the right behaviour to become

entrepreneurs thus affecting their business performance (Md. Ramli et al. 2011, p.13).

Ahmad Fahme et al. (2013) examines the effectiveness of monthly zakat distribution as a mechanism

to poverty reduction in the state of Kelantan, Malaysia. 481 respondents were randomly selected from

Kelantan‟s zakat recipient‟s list from the poor and needy category for ten districts in Kelantan. In-depth

interview were used to gather the data. For analysing the data, descriptive statistics were applied. Results

indicate that zakat elasticity is about 0.46, suggesting that, holding other variables constant, if the zakat

distribution goes up by 1 per cent, the monthly income goes up by 0.46 per cent. Further, the male

coefficient is about 0.15, meaning that the male gender receives about 0.15 per cent more income

compare to female gender, again holding other variables constant (Ahmad Fahme et al. 2013, p.181).

Thus, zakat distribution is significant in determining the income distribution among this group and

bringing positive effect towards improving the income distribution of this group.

6. Conclusion

Analysis of the articles related to critical current zakat issues between 2003 to 2013 can be concluded

that, zakat management can be briefly looked at the shift in the current practice to the beyond of the

religious perspective. This is because, the main objective of zakat is the achievement of socio economic

justice. Thus, it is important for zakat to be managed in the most efficient way. The whole idea of zakat

management is to help Muslims perform this pillar of Islam and establish its primary function as a means

to alleviate poverty. However, if trust is not sufficiently maintained between Muslims and zakat centre,

the potential zakat payers would prefer to pay out zakat directly to their own relatives who are poor or

needy, rather than deal through the zakat centre. Issues such as zakat fund not fully distribute,

dissatisfaction from zakat payers and delaying the payment of zakat should be tackled immediately so that

the zakat centre can avoid the payment done by zakat payer through the unofficial channel or in other

word the zakat payer is paying zakat direct to the zakat recipients. Zakat administration, on the other

hand, should play an important role in monitoring the activities of the involved recipients besides

3 Malaysia Federal Territory Zakat Centre



2015 Vol: 1 Issue 2

353


providing them with necessary skills, so that they can optimize the zakat funds channelled to them and

avoid unnecessary misspending.

On top of that, in terms of collection, a new and modern transaction approach to fund the collection

must be established such as such as Internet banking and other financial facilities. It requires a business

strategy where the zakat centre needs to have a corporate link with many financial institutions. To

accomplish the strategy, it appears that the zakat centre have to think beyond religion, treating the fund as

a type of secular taxation in which people must be persuaded rather than hoping they will willingly fulfil

their own obligation. The zakat disbursement has the ability to increase consumption since the marginal

propensity to consume of the zakat payer is lower than the zakat recipient, so that increasing the

purchasing power parity of the poor. The disbursement of zakat for income generation has also been

viewed as a strategic measure to solve the serious problems of poverty and unemployment in the majority

of Muslim countries. It is believed that the use of zakat funds for income generation programs can reduce

the poverty problem besides fostering sustainable economies. Most previous studies confirmed that the

utilization of zakat funds for income generating activities, such as setting up small and cottage industries

and providing necessary training for poor communities, will improve income and reduce the poverty rate.

Through this program, zakat funds can finance the economic activities of the eligible recipients based on

their skills and capabilities.

Lastly, the effectiveness of zakat in helping the poor is depends on the method of distribution and also

the purpose of it. This method however, needs to be strengthened and analysed from time to time so it

will serve the purpose to help the poor to have a better life. Often, there are various and interesting issues

occurred in zakat management, collection, distribution and poverty field which may gain interest from

researchers of Islamic scholar as well as economic researchers. This study not only explore in-depth for

those issues, but may also allow researchers to suggest solutions and produce new knowledge to solve

issues related to zakat.

Acknowledgement

Appreciation and thanks to Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia on university‟s grant: code

(PPP/FEM/IWM/30/14012) for the research titled: “Membangun Model Pelan Pembangunan Ekonomi

Dalam Membasmi Kemiskinan Di Kalangan Asnaf New Muslim (Muallaf) : Kajian Kes Di Negeri

Selangor”.

Reference

Ab Rahman, A. (2012). The Role of Zakat In Islamic Banking Institutions In Developing The Economy

of The Poor and Needy In Malaysia. Tazkia Islamic Finance and Business Review, 7(2).

Abdul Rahman, A. R. (2003). Zakat on business wealth in Malaysia: corporate Tax Rebate,

Accountability, And Governance. Jurnal IKIM, 11(1), pp.37-50.



2015 Vol: 1 Issue 2

354


Abdul Rahman AR., (2010). Islamic Microfinance : An Ethical Alternative to Poverty Alleviation,

Humanomics, vol.26, no.4, pp.284-295.

Ab Rahman, A., Alias, M. H., & Omar, S. M. N. S (2012) Zakat Institution in Malaysia: Problems and

Issues. GJAT | June | Vol 2 Issue 1 | 35 ISSN : 2232-0474 | E-ISSN : 2232-0482

Abdul-Rahman, A. R., & Goddard, A. (2003). Accountability verstehen: A study of accounting in state

religious councils in Malaysia. School of Management, University of Southampton.

Abdul Rahim Abdul Rahman. (2006), Pre-Requisites For Effective Integration Of Zakah Into Mainstream

Islamic Financial System In Malaysia, Islamic Economic Studies Vol. 14, No. 1 & 2, Aug. 2006 & Jan.

2007, pp. 91 - 107

Abdullah, K. H. A. (2007). Almsgiving (Zakat) of Traded Monies in Islamic Jurisprudence" Contrastive

Jurisprudence Study". An-Najah University Journal for Research

Abdullah, L. H., Ahmad, W. M. W., Rahman, N. N. A., Ali, A. K., Nor, M. R. M., Khalil, S. A., & Al-

Nahari, A. A. A. Q. (2012). Juristic Discourse on the Delay in Payment and Distribution of

Zakat. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 12(2), pp.176-181.

Abdullah, N., Yusop, M. M. M., & Awang, C. O. H. (2012). A Technical Note on The Derivation of

Zakat Effectiveness Index (Zein). International Journal of Economics, Management and

Accounting, 20(1).

Abioyea, M. M. O., Mohamad, M. H. S., & Adnan, M. A. (2011). Antecedents of Zakat Payers‟ Trust:

The Case of Nigeria. International Journal of Economics, Management and Accounting, 19(3).

Abuznaid, S. (2006). Islam and management: what can be learned?. Thunderbird International Business

Review, 48(1), pp.125-139.

Adebayo, R. I. (2011). Zakat and Poverty Alleviation: A Lesson for the Fiscal Policy Makers in

Nigeria. Journal of Islamic Economics, Banking and Finance,7(4), pp.26-41.

Adnan, N. S., Kamaluddi, A., & Kasim, N. (2013). Intellectual Capital in Religious Organisations:

Malaysian Zakat Institutions Perspective. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 16(3), p.368-377.

Ahmad, M. U., & Mahmood, A. (2009). Zakat fund–concept and perspective. International Journal of

Monetary Economics and Finance, 2(3), p.197-205.

Ahmad, A. (1984). A macro model of distribution in an Islamic economy. Journal of Research in Islamic

Economics, 2(1), 1. P.3-18.

Ahmed, H. (2004). Roles of Zakah and Awqaf in Poverty Alleviation. Jeddah: Islamic Development

Bank.

Ahmad Fahme Mohd Ali, Zaleha binti Mohd Noor, Muhammad Ridhwan Ab Aziz, Mohd Faisol

Ibrahim, Fuadah Johari., (2013) Impact of Zakat Distribution on Poor and Needy Recipients: An Analysis

in Kelantan, Malaysia. Aust. J. Basic & Appl. Sci., 7(13): pp.177-182,

Ahmad, S., & Wahid, H. (2005). Penerimaan dan tanggapan masyarakat terhadap sumber zakat harta

yang diikhtilaf. Islamiyyat, 27(1). pp.45-65



2015 Vol: 1 Issue 2

355


Ahmad, S., & Wahid, H. (2005). Persepsi agihan zakat dan kesannya terhadap pembayaran zakat melalui

institusi formal. Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia, 39, pp.53-69.

Ahmad, S., Wahid, H., & Mohamad, A. (2006). Penswastaan institusi zakat dan kesannya terhadap

pembayaran secara formal di Malaysia. International Journal of Management Studies (IJMS), 13(2),

pp.175-196.

Ahmad, W., & Mohamad, S. (2012). Classical Jurists‟ View on the Allocation of Zakat: Is Zakat

Investment Allowed?. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 12(2), pp.195-203.

Ahmed, H. (2008). Zakat, Macroeconomic Policies, and Poverty Alleviation: Lessons from Simulations

on Bangladesh. Journal of Islamic Economics, Banking and Finance, 4(2). pp.83-111

Afzalur Rahman, 1986. Economic Doctrines of Islam. Lahore: Islamic Publication.

AI-Masri, R. Y. (2006). Zakat and Taxes on Muslims and Non-Muslims. Islamic Economics, 19(1),

pp.47-71.

AI-Sheikh, N. (2006). The Rules Concerning the Time and Place of Paying Zakat. Islamic

Economics, 19(1), pp.3-43.

Ajrouch, K. J. (2005). Islam and Social Policy. Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews, 34(5),

pp.525-527.

Akanni, A. A. (2006). Profiling a model for the administration of zakat in a multi-religious society: the

case of south-western Nigeria. Journal of Philosophy and Culture, 3(2), pp.129-150.

Al Agha, S. (2007). Money laundering from Islamic perspective. Journal of Money Laundering

Control, 10(4), pp.406-411.

Al‐Habshi, S.M. (2005), “Zakat recognition and measurement of business wealth: an analysis of the

growth condition”, in Shanmugam, B. et al. (Eds), Issues in Islamic Accounting, University Putra

Malaysia Press, Serdang.

Alhabshi, S. O. (1998). Zakat di Malaysia kesannya terhadap pertumbuhan ekonomi orang islam Pulau

Pinang.

Alhabshi, Datuk Dr. Syed Othman, “Poverty Eradication From Islamic Perspectives,” Paper downloaded

from the Internet (http://elib.unitar.edu.my/staff-publications/datuk/JOURNAL.pdf)

Al-Jabr, Y. A., & Al-Sehali, M. S. (2006). Work Methodology of Zakat and Tax Objection Committees in

the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Economics and Administration, 20(2).

Al-Sehali, M. S., Jabr, A., & Ali, Y. (2006). Zakat and tax objections in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: an

analytical view. Journal of King Saud University, Administrative Sciences: 19 (1); pp.1-40

Al-Qardawi, Y. (1999), Fiqh Az-Zakat: A Comparative Study (translated), London: Dar Al-Taqwa.

Amuda, Y. J. (2013). Empowerment of Nigerian Muslim Households through Waqf, Zakat, Sadaqat and

Public Funding. International Journal of Trade, Economics & Finance, 4(6).

Arif, G. M. (2005). Poverty Targeting Efficiency of Zakat, Microfinance and Lady Health Workers

Program in Pakistan. Mimeo. 22(6), pp.77



2015 Vol: 1 Issue 2

356


Azeez, W. (2003). Zakat as the Islamic Social Insurance. Azeez, WO (2003)," Zakat as the Islamic Social

Insurance", Al-Hadarah: LASU Journal of Arabic and Islamic Studies, 6, pp.30-38.

Azhar Rosly, S. (2010). Shariah parameters reconsidered. International Journal of Islamic and Middle

Eastern Finance and Management, 3(2), pp.132-146.

Bakar, M. A., & Ghani, A. A. (2011). Towards achieving the quality of life in the management of zakat

distribution to the rightful recipients (the poor and needy). International Journal of Business and Social

Science, 2(4), pp.237-245.

Bakar, N. B. A. (2007). A zakat accounting standard (ZAS) for Malaysian companies. American Journal

of Islamic Social Sciences, 24(4), pp.74.

Bakar, N and Rahman, A “A Comparative Study of Zakah and Modern Taxation” J.KAU: Islamic Econ.,

Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 25-40.

Bashi, I. M. D., & Mansour, A. I. (2005). Using the Financial Position to Calculate Zakat on

Trade. Islamic Economics, 18(1).

Badruddin, M., & Razak, N. B. A. (2011). Reorientasi Tentang Zakat Perniagaan: Pengalaman

Malaysia. Media Syari'ah, 13(2).

Bello, A. (2003). Zakat as an Effective Fiscal Policy Instrument to Shariah Compliant States.

In Background issues to ethics in accounting: being, Proceedings of the First National Conference on

Ethical Issues in Accounting, Organised by Department of Accounting, Bayero University, Vol. 1, pp.

262.

Bidin, Z., Idris, K. M., & Shamsudin, F. M. (2009). Predicting Compliance Intention on Zakat on

Employ-ment Income in Malaysia: An Application of Reasoned Action Theory. Jurnal Pengurusan, 28,

pp.85-102.

Chaudhry, I. S. (2009). Poverty alleviation in Southern Punjab (Pakistan): An empirical evidence from

the project area of Asian Development Bank. International Research Journal of Finance and

Economics, 23, pp.23-32.

Dhar, P. (2013). Zakat as a Measure of Social Justice in Islamic Finance: An Accountant‟s

Overview. Journal of Emerging Economies and Islamic Research (JEEIR), 1(1).

Djamil, F. (2004). Pendekatan Maqashid Al-Syari‟ah Terhadap Pendayagunaan Zakat. Dalam: Abidin, ed.

Reinterpretasi Pendayagunaan ZIS Menuju Efektivitas Pemanfaatan Zakat, Infak, Sedekah. Jakarta:

PIRAMEDIA.

Duka, S. (2013). The Role of Government in Optimizing of “Zakat” Management at Mamuju District

Province West Sulawesi. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 4(18), pp.134-140.

Raditya Sukmana, S. E. (2010). The Power Of Zakah In Poverty Alleviation. Seventh International

Conference – The Tawhidi Epistemology:Zakat And Waqf Economy, Bangi 2010. pp. 409 - 434

Fatwa, A. M., Doa, M. D., Mufti, A., Malla, A. B., & Mude, M. S. (2004).Problem kemiskinan: zakat

sebagai solusi alternatif. Belantika.



2015 Vol: 1 Issue 2

357


Firdaus, M., Beik, I. S., Irawan, T., & Juanda, B. (2012). Economic estimation and determinations of

Zakat potential in Indonesia. Jeddah: Islamic Research and Training Institute.

Fuadah Johari, Muhammad Ridhwan Ab Aziz, Mohd Faisol Ibrahim and Ahmad Fahme Mohd Ali.

(2013). The Roles of Islamic Social Welfare Assistant (Zakat) for the Economic Development of New

Convert. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research 18 (3): pp.330-339.

Hakim, M. A. P. D. L. (2012). The Alleviation Of Rural Poverty in Malaysia: The Role Of Zakat A Case

Study. Journal of Architecture, Planning and Construction Management, 2(1).

Halim, A. A. (2005). Islam and Social Policy (review). Journal of Middle East Women's Studies, 1(3),

pp.127-130.

Halim, H. A., Said, J., & Yusuf, S. N. S. (2012). Individual characteristics of the successful asnaf

entrepreneurs: Opportunities and solutions for zakat organization in Malaysia. International Business and

Management, 4(2), pp.41-49.

Hassan, M. K., & Khan, J. M. (2007). Zakat, external debt and poverty reduction strategy in

Bangladesh. Journal of Economic Cooperation, 28(4), pp.1-38.

Hassan, R. (2007). Giving and Gaining: Philanthropy and Social Justice in Muslim Societies. Lahore

Journal of Policy Studies.

Hassan, M. K. (2010). An Integrated Poverty Alleviation Model Combining Zakat, Awqaf and

Microfinance. Paper presented at Seventh International Conference – The Tawhidi Epistemology: Zakat

and Waqf Economy, Bangi. pp 1-10

Hassanen, S. H. (2013). The Impact of Zakat and Tax Services on Auditors' Fraud-Risk Assessment in

Financial Statements for Audit Clients: An Experimental Study. Journal of King Abdulaziz University:

Economics & Administration, 27(1).

Hayati, K., & Caniago, I. (2012). Model Of Poor Society Empowerment Through Optimizing The

Potential Of Zakat: A Case Study in Lampung Province. Journal of Indonesian Economy &

Business,27(2).

Hairunnizam Wahid, Sanep Ahmad & Mohd Ali Mohd Noor, 2004, Kesan Bantuan Zakat Terhadap

Kualiti Hidup Asnaf Fakir Dan Miskin, Journal of Muamalat and Islamic Finance Research (JMIFR) -

Vol.1, No.1 2004-Part9, pp.1-8.

Hairunnizam Wahid, Sanep Ahmad & Mohd Ali Mohd Nor. 2004. Kesan bantuan zakat terhadap kualiti

hidup asnaf fakir dan miskin. The Journal of Muamalat and Islamic Finance Research 1(1): pp.151-166.

Hairunnizam Wahid, Sanep Ahmad and Mohd. Ali Mohd Noor. 2005. Kesedaran Membayar Zakat

Pendapatan di Malaysia. Seminar Ekonomi dan Kewangan Islam, Fakulti Ekonomi, Universiti Utara

Malaysia, 29-30 August, pp 265-274.

Hendrik, H. (2012). Pengaruh Zakat Terhadap Pengentasan Kemiskinan Umat. Manajemen Bisnis

Syariah, 10(02/5).



2015 Vol: 1 Issue 2

358


Hossain, M. I. (2013). Analysis on Poverty Alleviation by Mosque Based Zakat Administration in

Bangladesh: An empirical study. Journal of Poverty, Investment and Development, 1, pp.120-125.

Hossain, M. (2005). Zakat Based Poverty Eradication In Bangladesh: The Millennium Development Goal

Is Exceed Able. Institute of Hazrat Mohammad (SAW): Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Hassan, M. K., & Khan, J. M. (2007). Zakat, external debt and poverty reduction strategy in

Bangladesh. Journal of Economic Cooperation, 28(4), pp.1-38.

Hassan, M. Kabir (2006). “The Role of Zakat in Poverty Alleviation in Bangladesh”, Paper Presented at a

conference in Dhaka, November 24-26, 2006.

Hudayati, A., & Tohirin, A. (2010). Management Of Zakah: Centralised Vs Decentralised Approach.

Seventh International Conference – The Tawhidi Epistemology: Zakat and Waqf Economy, Bangi 2010,

pp. 351-374

Ismail, A. G., & Possumah, B. T. (2013). Theoretical Model for Zakat-Based Islamic Microfinance

Institutions in Reducing Poverty. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 103.

Ibn. Qudamah. (1968). Al Mughni. Kaherah: Matba‟ah al Qahirah.

Jahar, A. S. (2006). The Clash of Muslims and the State: Waqf and Zakat in Post Independence

Indonesia. Studia Islamika, 13(3).

Jasim Al-Ajmi, Hameeda Abo Hussain, Nadhem Al-Saleh, (2009) "Decisions on capital structure in a

Zakat environment with prohibition of riba: The case of Saudi Arabia", Journal of Risk Finance, The,

Vol. 10 Iss: 5, pp.460 - 476

Johari, F. (2004). Keberkesanan Zakat dalam Mengatasi Masalah Kemiskinan di Negeri Malaka. Kuala

Lumpur: Akademi pengajian Islam, University Malaya.

Johari, F., Ali, A. F. M., Ab Aziz, M. R. (2014a). The role of zakat in reducing poverty and income

inequality among new convert (muallaf) in Selangor, Malaysia. Online Journal of Research in Islamic

Studies. 1 (3), pp.43-56

Johari, F., Ali, A. F. M., Ab Aziz, M. R., & Ahmad, N. (2014b). The Importance of Zakat Distribution

and Urban-Rural Poverty Incidence among Muallaf (New Convert). Asian Social Science, 10(21), pp.42-

53.

Johari, F., Ali, A. F. M., & Ab Aziz, M. R. (2015). The Role Of Zakat Distribution Among Muallaf (New

Convert) In Reducing Poverty In Selangor, Malaysia. İktisat Politikası Araştırmaları Dergisi (Journal of

Economic Policy Researches), 2(1), pp.39-56.

Kaslam, S. (2011). Governing Zakat as a Social Institution: The Malaysian Perspective. International

Journal of Governance, 1(2), pp.282-294.

Kaslam, S., & Bahrom, H. (2007). Amalan „Corporate Governance‟Dalam Pengurusan Institusi Zakat Di

Malaysia. Jurnal Pengurusan JAWHAR, 1(2), pp.53-70.

Khatimah, H. (2004). Pengaruh Zakat Produktif terhadap Peningkatan Kesejahteraan Ekonomi Para

Mustahik. dalam Jurnal Ekonomi Keuangan dan Bisnis Islam, 50(4).



2015 Vol: 1 Issue 2

359


Kahf, Monzer. 1997. “Introduction to the Study of ZakŒh.” In Economics of ZakŒh: A Book of

Readings, edited by Monzer Kahf. Jeddah: Islamic Development Bank & Islamic Research & Training

Institute.

Khaf, M. (1995). Zakat: Unsolved Issues in contemporary Fiqh. Development and Finance in Islam.

Kuala Lumpur: Zafar Press Pte. Ltd.

Kahf, M. (2004). Islamic banks: the rise of a new power alliance of wealth and Shari‟a scholarship. The

Politics of Islamic Finance, pp.17-36.

Komala, A. R. (2012). The Influence Of The Accounting Managers‟knowledge And The Top

Managements‟support On The Accounting Information System And Its Impact On The Quality Of

Accounting Information: A Case Of Zakat Institutions In Bandung. Journal of Global Management, 4(1),

pp.53-73.

Lessy, Z. (2009). Zakat (Alms-Giving) Management In Indonesia: Whose Job Should It Be?. La Riba

Journal of Islamic Economy, 3(1), pp.155-175.

Loo, E. C., Evans, C., & McKerchar, M. (2010). Challenges in Understanding Compliance Behaviour of

Taxpayers in Malaysia. Asian Journal of Business and Accounting, 3(2).

Mahat, N. I., & Warokka, A. (2013). Investigation on zakat as an indicator for Moslem countries'

economic growth. Journal for Global Business Advancement, 6(1), pp.50-58.

Mahmud, M. W., & Haneef, S. S. S. (2008). Debatable Issues in Fiqh Al-Zakat: A Jurisprudential

Appraisal. Jurnal Fiqh, 5(6), pp.117-142.

Mahmud, M. W., & Shah Haneef, S. S. (2009). The use of zakat revenue in Islamic financing:

jurisprudential debate and practical feasibility. Studies in Islam and the Middle East, 6(1), pp.1-15.

Mashreque, M. S., & Nasrullah, A. M. (2006). Role Of Zakat In Poverty Alleviation: Bangladesh

Perspective. Aspects of Islam and Muslim Societies, 94.

Masudul Alam Choudhury, Sofyan Syafri Harahap, (2008) "Interrelationship between Zakat, Islamic

bank and the economy: A theoretical exploration", Managerial Finance, Vol. 34 Iss: 9, pp.610 – 617

Mohit, M. A., & Nazyddah, N. (2011). Social housing programme of Selangor Zakat Board of Malaysia

and housing satisfaction. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 26(2), pp.143-164.

Mohd Parid Syeikh Ahmad. (2001). Kaedah Pengagihan Dana Zakat: Satu Perspektif Islam. Dalam Nik

Mustapha Nik Hassan (pent). Kaedah Pengagihan Dana Zakat; Satu Perspektif Islam. Kuala Lumpur:

IKIM.

Muhamat, A. A., Jaafar, N., Rosly, H. E., & Manan, H. A. (2013). An appraisal on the business success of

entrepreneurial< IT> asnaf</IT>: An empirical study on the state zakat organization (the Selangor Zakat

Board or Lembaga Zakat Selangor) in Malaysia. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 11(1),

pp.51-63.



2015 Vol: 1 Issue 2

360


Muhammad Akhyar Adnan, Nur Barizah Abu Bakar, (2009) "Accounting treatment for corporate zakat: a

critical review", International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, Vol. 2

Iss: 1, pp.32 – 45.

Muhammad, N., & Ali, S. R. (2013). The Role of Zakat in Improving the Economic Status of

Beneficiaries in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. Journal of Managerial Sciences, 7(2).

Muhammad Ridhwan Ab. Aziz (2012). Introduction to Islamic Institutions in Economics and Finance.

Bandar Baru Nilai: USIM Publisher.

Mujaini Tarimin. 2005. Zakat Menuju Pengurusan Profesional. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan Publications and

Distributors.

Nadzri, F. A. A., Abd, R., & Rahman, M. O. (2012). Zakat and Poverty Alleviation: Roles of Zakat

Institutions in Malaysia. International Journal of Arts and Commerce, 1(7), pp.61-72.

Nik Hassan, N. M. (1991). Zakah in Malaysia: Present and Future Status.Development and Finance in

Islam.

Nor, M. A. M., Wahid, H., & Nor, N. G. M. (2004). Kesedaran membayar zakat pendapatan di kalangan

kakitangan profesional Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Islamiyyat: Jurnal Antarabangsa Pengajian

Islam; International Journal of Islamic Studies, 26, pp.59-67.

Norazlina Abd. Wahab, Abdul Rahim Abdul Rahman, (2011) "A framework to analyse the efficiency and

governance of zakat institutions", Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, Vol. 2 Iss: 1,

pp.43 – 62.

Norulazidah Ph Omar Ali, D. H., & Myles, G. D. (2010). The consequences of zakat for capital

accumulation. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 12(4), pp.837-856.

Norulazidah, D. H., Ali, P. O., & Myles, G. (2008). The Consequences of Zakat for Capital

Accumulation (No. 0814).

Nur Barizah, A. B. (2008). Zakat and taxation: A conceptual comparison. Journal of Islam and

International Affairs, 2(3), pp.91-103.

Nurlaelawati, E. (2010). Zakat And The Concept Of Ownership In Islam: Yusuf Qaradawi‟s Perspective

on Islamic Economics. Al-Jami'ah: Journal of Islamic Studies, 48(2), pp.365-385.

Nurzaman, M. S. (2011). Zakat and Human Development: An Empirical Analysis on Poverty Alleviation

in Jakarta, Indonesia. In 8th International Conference on Islamic Economics and Finance. pp.1-26

Powell, R. (2009). Zakat: Drawing Insights for Legal Theory and Economic Policy from Islamic

Jurisprudence. Pitt. Tax Rev., 7, 43.

Prihatna, A. A., & Abidin, H. (2005). Muslim philanthropy: potential and reality of zakat in Indonesia:

survey results in ten cities. Piramedia.

Qaradawi, Yusuf, (2000), Fiqh al-Zakah, Vol II .English Translation by Monzer Kahf, Jeddah, Scientific

Publishing Centre, King Abdulaziz University.



2015 Vol: 1 Issue 2

361


Qaradawi, Y. (1999). Fiqh al zakah (Volume 1): A comparative study of zakah, regulations and

philosophy in the light of Quran and Sunnah. Saudi Arabia: King Abdul Aziz University.Sadeq, A. H.

(1997). Poverty Alleviation: An Islamic Perspective. Humanomics, 13 (3), pp.110 – 134.

Razak, M. I. M., Ismail, M., & Hamzah, A. S. A. (2013) Overview of Zakat Collection in Malaysia:

Regional Analysis. American International Journal of Contemporary Research Vol. 3 No. 8 pp.140-148

Rahman, R. A., & Awang, R. (2003). Assessing business zakat at Pusat Zakat Selangor: between theory

and practice. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 1(1), pp.33-48.

Rasool, M. S. A., Harun, M. F. M., Salleh, A. M., & Idris, N. A. H. (2011). Poverty measurement in

Malaysian zakat institutions: A theoretical survey. Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia, 45, pp.123-129.

Raquib, A. (2011). Islamic Banking & Zakat-An Alternative Approach to Poverty Reduction in

Bangladesh. Journal of Islamic Economics, Banking and Finance,7(2), pp.11-26.

Ramli, R. M., Ahmad, S., Wahid, H., & Harun, F. M. (2011, July). Understanding asnaf attitude:

Malaysia‟s experience in quest for an effective zakat distribution programme. In International Zakat

Conference: Sustainable Zakat Development in the Poverty Alleviation and Improvement of Welfare of

the Ummah.pp.1-22.

Rosbi Abd Rahman, Sanep Ahmad & Hailani Muji Tahir. (2009). Penilaian Komprehensif Keberkesanan

Agihan Zakat Mengikut Perspektif Maqasid Al-Syariah. Jurnal Pengurusan JAWHAR Vol3, No 2, pp.47-

67.

Reinstein, D. 2006. Does one contribution come at the expense of another? Empirical evidence on

substitution among charitable donations.

Salim, A., & Azra, A. (Eds.). (2003). Shari'a and politics in modern Indonesia. Institute of Southeast

Asian Studies.

Salim, A. (2006). Influential Legacy of Dutch Islamic Policy on the Formation of Zakat (ALMS) Law in

Modern Indonesia, The. Pac. Rim L. & Pol'y J., 15, 683.

Salleh, M. S. (2002). Lokalisasi Zakat: Satu Cadangan Teoritis. Zakat Specialist Meet, Universiti

Kebangsaan Malaysia, pp.21-22.

Sartika, M. (2008). Pengaruh Pendayagunaan Zakat Produktif terhadap Pemberdayaan Mustahiq pada

LAZ Yayasan Solo Peduli Surakarta. dalam Jurnal Ekonomi Islam LA_RIBA, 2(1).

Sadeq, AHM. (1995), “Ethioco-eco-Institution of Zakah: An Instrument of Self-Reliance and Sustainable

Grass-Root Development” (Mimeograph).

Schäublin, E. (2009). The West Bank Zakat Committees (1977–2009) in the Local Context. The Centre

on Conflict, Development and Peacebuilding. CCDP Working Paper.

Schumm, W. R., & Kohler, A. L. (2006). Social Cohesion and the Five Pillars of Islam: A Comparative

Perspective. American Journal of Islamic Social Sciences, 23(2), 126.

Semerdjian, E. (2010). Charity in Islamic Societies (review). Journal of World History, 21(3), pp.505-

509.



2015 Vol: 1 Issue 2

362


Shafie, S., Azmi, W. N. W., & Haron, S. (2004). Adopting And Measuring Customer Service Quality In

Islamic Banks: A Case Study. Journal of Muamalat and Islamic Finance Research (JMIFR)-Vol, 1(1).

Shariff, A. M., Jusoh, W. N. H. W., Mansor, N., & Jusoff, K. (2011). A robust zakat system: Towards a

progressive socio-economic development in Malaysia. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 7(4),

pp.550-554.

Sarif S.,Kamri N. (2009). A Theoretical Discussion on Zakat For Income Generation and Its Fiqh Issues,

Jurnal Syariah, Jil.17, Bil.3, pp. 457-500.

Shirazi, N. S. (2006). Providing for the Resource Shortfall for Poverty Elimination through the Institution

of Zakat in Low-Income Muslim Countries. International Journal of Economics, Management and

Accounting, 14(1).

Shirazi, N. S. (2006). Providing for the Resource Shortfall for Poverty Elimination through the Institution

of Zakat in Low-Income Muslim Countries.International Journal of Economics, Management and

Accounting, 14(1). pp. 1- 27

Shirazi, N. S., & Amin, F. M. (2010). Prospects of Poverty Elimination through Potential Zakat

Collection in OIC-Member Countries: Reappraised. Journal of Islamic Economic, Banking and

Finance, 6(3).

Siswantoro, D. (2012). The Need of Standardization of Individual Zakat Calculation in Indonesia. Tazkia

Islamic Finance and Business Review, 7(1).

Siswantoro, D., & Nurhayati, S. (2012). Factors Affecting Concern about Zakat as a Tax Deduction in

Indonesia. International Journal of Management and Business Research, 2(4), pp.293-312.

Suhaib, A. Q. (2009). Contribution of Zakat in the social development of Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of

Social Sciences, 29(2), pp.313-334.

Suhaili Sarif & Nor `Azzah Kamri (2009). A Theoretical Discussion Of Zakat For Income Generation

And Its Fiqh Issues. Shariah Journal, Vol. 17, No. 3 (2009). pp.457-500.

Sarif, S., Kamri, N. A., & Ali, N. A. (2014). The Shifts In Zakah Management Practices In Malaysia:

What Has Actually Been Happening?. Jurnal Syariah, 21(1). pp. 1-20

Sulaiman, M. (2003). The influence of riba and zakat on Islamic accounting. Indonesian Management

and Accounting Review, 2(2), p.149-167.

Suprayitno, E., Kader, R. A., & Harun, A. (2013). The Impact of Zakat on Aggregate Consumption in

Malaysia. Journal of Islamic Economics, Banking and Finance, 9(1), pp.39-62.

Syed Othman Al Habshi, 2006. Peranan Zakat Dalam Membantu Pembangunan Ekonomi Negara.

Tarar, A., & Riaz, M. (2012). Impact of Zakat on Economy: Structure and Implementation in

Pakistan. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 3(10), pp.151-155.

Tarimin, M. (2005). Golongan Penerima Zakat: Agihan Dana Zakat Secara Lebih Berkesan. Pusat

Penerbitan Universiti (UPENA), Universiti Teknologi MARA.



2015 Vol: 1 Issue 2

363


Toor, I. A., & Nasar, A. (2004). Zakat As A Social Safety Net: Exploring the Impact on Household

Welfare in Pakistan. Pakistan Economic and Social Review, pp.87-102.

Wahab, N. A., & Rahman, A. R. A. (2012). Efficiency of zakat institutions in Malaysia: An application of

data envelopment analysis. Journal of Economic Cooperation and Development, 33(1), pp.95-112.

Wahid, H., Ahmad, S., & Noor, M. A. M. (2007). Kesedaran membayar zakat pendapatan di

Malaysia. Islamiyyat: Jurnal Antarabangsa Pengajian Islam; International Journal of Islamic

Studies, 29, pp.53-70.

Wahid, H., Ahmad, S., & Nor, M. A. M. (2004). Kesan Bantuan Zakat Terhadap Kualiti Hidup: Kajian

Kes Asnaf Fakir dan Miskin (“The effect of zakat aid on the quality of life: the case of the poor and needy

recipients”). The Journal of Muamalat & Islamic Finance Research, 1, pp.151-66.

Wahid, H., & Kader, R. A. (2010). Localization of Malaysian Zakat Distribution: Perceptions Of Amil

And Zakat Recipients. In Proceedings of Seventh International Conference–The Tawhidi Epistemology:

Zakat and Waqf Economy.

Wahid, H., Ahmad, S., & Kader, R. A. (2010). Pengagihan Zakat Oleh Institusi Zakat Kepada Lapan

Asnaf: Kajian Di Malaysia. Paper presented in International Islamic Economic Conference 2008/2009 on

10-11 February 2009 at APIUM. pp. 1-17

Wali, H. N. (2013). Utilization of Zakat and Islamic Endowment Funds for Poverty Reduction: A Case

Study of Zakat and Hubsi Commission, Kano State-Nigeria. Journal of Economics and Sustainable

Development, 4(18), pp.141-147.

Yaumidin, Karomah.U. (2009) Islamic Alternative: Coparative Study between Indonesia and Malaysia.

Paper presented in the International Conference on Islamic Economics & Economics of the OIC

Countries, Kuala Lumpur, 2009, 28 – 29 April.

Yusoff, M. (2011). Zakat expenditure, school enrollment, and economic growth in

Malaysia. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(6), pp.175-181.

Yusoff, M. B. (2006). Fiscal Policy in an Islamic Economy and the Role of Zakat. International Journal

of Economics, Management and Accounting, 14(2). pp. 117 - 145

Yusoff, M. B. (2010). An Analysis Of Zakót Expenditure And Real Output: Theory And

Evidence. International Journal of Economics, Management and Accounting, 18(2). pp.139-160

Yusoff, M., & Densumite, S. (2012). Zakat distribution and growth in the federal territory of

Malaysia. Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, 4(8), pp.449-456.

Yusuf, M. B. O., & Derus, A. M. (2013). Measurement model of corporate zakat collection in Malaysia:

A test of diffusion of innovation theory. Humanomics,29(1), pp.61-74.

Zainol, B., & Kamil, M. I. (2007). The role of attitude and subjective norm on intention to comply zakat

on employment income. IkaZ International Journal of Zakat, 1(1), pp.113-134.

Documents

A Review of Literatures on Current Zakat Issues: An Analysis