15
A REVIEW OF THE U.S. SUPREME COURT’S 2014 TERM Jason P. Steed Bell Nunnally & Martin LLP Felonies, Confederacies, Subsidies, and Dignities

A REVIEW OF THE U.S. SUPREME COURT’S 2014 TERM Jason P. Steed Bell Nunnally & Martin LLP Felonies, Confederacies, Subsidies, and Dignities

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: A REVIEW OF THE U.S. SUPREME COURT’S 2014 TERM Jason P. Steed Bell Nunnally & Martin LLP Felonies, Confederacies, Subsidies, and Dignities

A REVIEW OF THE U.S. SUPREME COURT’S

2014 TERM

Jason P. Steed Bel l Nunnal ly & Martin LLP

Felonies, Confederacies, Subsidies, and Dignities

Page 2: A REVIEW OF THE U.S. SUPREME COURT’S 2014 TERM Jason P. Steed Bell Nunnally & Martin LLP Felonies, Confederacies, Subsidies, and Dignities

Numbers

Court gets 8,000-10,000 cert petitions/yearDecided 74 cases in 2014 Term (average

79)41% unanimous; 60% with 7+ majority 19 5-4 decisions (26%)

Kennedy in majority 13/19

Page 3: A REVIEW OF THE U.S. SUPREME COURT’S 2014 TERM Jason P. Steed Bell Nunnally & Martin LLP Felonies, Confederacies, Subsidies, and Dignities

Fourth Amendment

Heien v. North Carolina Does officer’s

“reasonable mistake” justify a traffic stop, where no traffic law was being broken?

8-1 (Roberts): Yes. (Sotomayor dissent.)

Rodriguez v. U.S. Can officer extend a

traffic stop to conduct a suspicionless dog sniff?

6-3 (Ginsburg): No.

Page 4: A REVIEW OF THE U.S. SUPREME COURT’S 2014 TERM Jason P. Steed Bell Nunnally & Martin LLP Felonies, Confederacies, Subsidies, and Dignities

Fourth Amendment

Los Angeles v. Patel Is city ordinance permitting

random searches of hotel records unconstitutional?

5-4 (Sotomayor): Yes. Facial challenges permitted under 4th Amend.

Carroll v. Carman Does warrantless backdoor

approach violate 4th Amend.?

Per Curiam: Officer gets QI because it isn’t clearly established. (Still not!)

Page 5: A REVIEW OF THE U.S. SUPREME COURT’S 2014 TERM Jason P. Steed Bell Nunnally & Martin LLP Felonies, Confederacies, Subsidies, and Dignities

Eighth Amendment

Glossip v. Gross Does using midazolam

in lethal injection protocol violate Eighth Amend.?

5-4 (Alito): No. Sotomayor dissent;

Breyer dissent (inviting challenges to death penalty).

Page 6: A REVIEW OF THE U.S. SUPREME COURT’S 2014 TERM Jason P. Steed Bell Nunnally & Martin LLP Felonies, Confederacies, Subsidies, and Dignities

First Amendment (almost)

Holt v. Hobbs 9-0 (Alito): Prison

policy preventing Muslim prisoner from growing 1/2-inch beard violated RLUIPA.

Elonis v. United States 8-1 (Roberts/Thomas):

Criminal prosecution for “threats” on Facebook requires knowledge or intent (more than negligence).

Page 7: A REVIEW OF THE U.S. SUPREME COURT’S 2014 TERM Jason P. Steed Bell Nunnally & Martin LLP Felonies, Confederacies, Subsidies, and Dignities

Walker v. Sons of Confederate Veterans

Does Texas DMV Board’s rejection of proposed license plate design featuring Confederate flag violate the 1st Amend?

5-4 (Breyer): No. License plates are government speech, so state can decide what they say.

Alito dissent.

Page 8: A REVIEW OF THE U.S. SUPREME COURT’S 2014 TERM Jason P. Steed Bell Nunnally & Martin LLP Felonies, Confederacies, Subsidies, and Dignities

Redistricting & Gerrymandering

Alabama: Did district court panel

apply correct standards or test in determining AL redistricting was not “racial gerrymander” under section 5 of VRA?

5-4 (Breyer): No.Arizona:

Can voters use ballot initiative to create independent commission to draw congressional districts instead of state legislature?

5-4 (Ginsburg): Yes (in Arizona, at least).

Page 9: A REVIEW OF THE U.S. SUPREME COURT’S 2014 TERM Jason P. Steed Bell Nunnally & Martin LLP Felonies, Confederacies, Subsidies, and Dignities

Interpreting Statutes

Kimble v. Marvel Enterprises Can patent holder

collect royalties after patent has expired? (Brulotte)

6-3 (Kagan): No (affirming Brulotte). Alito dissent!

Page 10: A REVIEW OF THE U.S. SUPREME COURT’S 2014 TERM Jason P. Steed Bell Nunnally & Martin LLP Felonies, Confederacies, Subsidies, and Dignities

King v. Burwell

Does the ACA’s reference to “exchanges created by the State” preclude availability of tax credits for those who purchase insurance through “such exchanges” created by the federal government?

6-3 (Roberts): No. Plain meaning of statute as whole is that credits are available for all exchanges.

Scalia dissent (“absurd” & “jiggery-pokery”).

Page 11: A REVIEW OF THE U.S. SUPREME COURT’S 2014 TERM Jason P. Steed Bell Nunnally & Martin LLP Felonies, Confederacies, Subsidies, and Dignities

Interpreting Criminal Statutes

Yates v. U.S. Are fish “tangible objects”

under Sarbanes-Oxley? 5-4* (Ginsburg): No. (Kagan

dissent.)

Whitfield v. U.S. Statute enhances

punishment if ∆ forces person to “accompany” him during bank robbery. Is this triggered if ∆ forces someone to move “several feet, from one room to another”?

9-0 (Scalia): Yes.

Page 12: A REVIEW OF THE U.S. SUPREME COURT’S 2014 TERM Jason P. Steed Bell Nunnally & Martin LLP Felonies, Confederacies, Subsidies, and Dignities

Marriage

Kerry v. Din 3 (Scalia, w/ Roberts &

Thomas): U.S. citizen has no protected right or liberty interest in living with spouse, to trigger Due Process.

2 (Kennedy, w/ Alito): Due Process satisfied even if there was marital right.

Obergefell v. Hodges 5-4 (Kennedy): Fundamental

right to marry for everyone. 4 separate dissents (Scalia’s

“head in a bag”; Roberts from the bench).

Page 13: A REVIEW OF THE U.S. SUPREME COURT’S 2014 TERM Jason P. Steed Bell Nunnally & Martin LLP Felonies, Confederacies, Subsidies, and Dignities

Coming in 2015

Luis v. U.S. – Does seizure of assets needed to pay for criminal defense violate 5th & 6th Amend?

Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association – Challenging “fair shared” fees for public-sector unions

Fisher v. University of Texas –affirmative action3 cases involving death penalty issues.2 cases involving “one person, one vote” principle.2 cases involving class action issues.2 cases involving Indian lawExpunging criminal records & Rule 11 hearings?

Page 14: A REVIEW OF THE U.S. SUPREME COURT’S 2014 TERM Jason P. Steed Bell Nunnally & Martin LLP Felonies, Confederacies, Subsidies, and Dignities

More Numbers

2016 Ginsburg (83) Scalia (80) Kennedy (80) Breyer (78)

2020 Ginsburg (87) Scalia (84) Kennedy (84) Breyer (82) Thomas (72)

Page 15: A REVIEW OF THE U.S. SUPREME COURT’S 2014 TERM Jason P. Steed Bell Nunnally & Martin LLP Felonies, Confederacies, Subsidies, and Dignities

Questions?

Jason P. SteedBELL NUNNALLY & MARTIN [email protected]: @5thCircAppealsLinkedIn