50
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l 42E12NW81S2 2.11825 SANDRA A Report of the Property of GLEN AUDEN RESOURCES LIMITED Dorthea and Eva Townships, Thunder Bay Mining Division, Ontario by R.P. Bowen, P.Eng. and Harold Bent 010 l 1988 R.P. BOWEN ENGINEERING INC. P.O. Box 5010, PMS, South Porcupine, Ontario PON 1KO (705)235-5139 30 September 1988 M-316

A RPT OF THE PROP OF GLEN AUDEN RESC LTD DORETHEA & …

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l

42E12NW81S2 2.11825 SANDRA

A Report of the Property of

GLEN AUDEN RESOURCES LIMITED

Dorthea and Eva Townships, Thunder Bay Mining Division,

Ontario

by

R.P. Bowen, P.Eng.

and

Harold Bent

010

l 1988

R.P. BOWEN ENGINEERING INC. P.O. Box 5010, PMS, South Porcupine, Ontario PON 1KO

(705)235-5139

30 September 1988

M-316

lllllllllllllllllll

TABLE OF C* 4aEi2NwatS2 a.ness SANDRA

Page SUMMARY................................................. i

INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . lLocation and Access,..,,.........,.,.....,......... lClaims........................................ . . . . . lPhysiography....,................,.,......,........ 4Present Survey..,...........,.............,........ 4Previous Work.....,........................... . . . . . 4

GENERAL GEOLOGY........................... . ,. . . .,. . ,. . . , 13

METAMORPHISM.....................,.................. . ... 22

STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY...................................... 22

STRATIGRAPHY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25

GEOPHYSICS.......................................... . . . . 25

GEOCHEMISTRY............................................ 27

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS......................... 31

REFERENCES.............................................. 32

FIGURES

Figure l - Regional Location Map........................... 2Figure 2 - Claim Map. . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3Figure 3 - Equal Area Steronet Plot of Poles to Foliations. 23Figure 4 - Aeromagnetic Map................................ 26Figure 5 - Jensen Cation Plot.............................. 28Figure 6 - AFM Plot....,...,...................,........... 29Figure 7 - QAP Plot..........................,............. 30

TABLES

Table l - Table of Lithologic Units........................ 14

MAPS

Geological Map Scale 1:5,000 (Back Pocket)

010C

l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l

SUMMARY

The Glen Auden property comprised of some 63 staked and leased mining claims in Dorthea and Eva Townships, Thunder Bay Mining Division of Ontario is located on the east shore of Lake Nipigon about 180 km northeast of Thunder Bay.The area is underlain by Precambrian metavolcanic and metasedimentary rocks that have been intruded by plutonic plugs and dikes. The metavolcanic rocks are are primarily intermediate to felsic pyroclastic breccias and lesser mafic massive flows. The metasedimentary rocks are made up of polymictic orthoconglomerates, arkose and wackes, siltstones and argillites and some banded oxide affinity iron rich units. Both felsic (quartz feldspar porphyry) and mafic (gabbro) bodies intrude the metavolcanic and metasedimentary units. Cutting all rock units are Middle to Late Precambrian diabase dikes.Gold mineralization has been reported in a number of settings and on the property appears to be most commonly associated with narrow quartz stringers in altered (pyrite-sericite) sheared volcanic breccia in close proximity to felsic plugs. Base metal mineralization (chalcopyrite-molybdenite) has been described associated with quartz stringers and fractures in a granodiorite plug on the property. The oxide affinity iron rich rocks are too narrow and not high enough in iron content to be economic at the present time.While some diamond drill targets have been selected on past information and recent IP/Resistivity surveys further geophysical surveys on a more detailed grid and soil and primary geochemical data could perhaps provide additional targets.

11111

1

*INTRODUCTION

Location and Access

The property is on the east shore of Lake Nipigon, Thunder Bay

Mining Division, Ontario, Figure 1.

Access to the property is gained from Beardmore via Highway 580

1

1

1

1

1

to the mouth of the Sturgeon River then

shore of the river onto the property.

of access would be to turn off Highway

from Highway 11 then to travel north to

River about 5 miles from the river mouth

property may be accessed from the river.

Claims

by boat along the north

An alternative method

580 about 6 kilometers

a point on the Sturgeon

The full length of the

The Glen Auden property consists of 54 staked mining claims and 9

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

leased mining claims held by Glen Auden Resources Limited mining

license T-1915 in Dorthea, Sandra and Summers Townships, Thunder

Bay Mining Division, Ontario, Figure 2.

Leased Claims

TB 20190 TB 20194TB 20191 TB 20196TB 20193 TB 20197

Staked Claims No.

867026-867030 inclusive 5872223-872241 inclusive 19872244-872245 inclusive 2872247-872249 inclusive 3878381-878401 inclusive 211009078-1009081 inclusive .J.

Total 54

TB 20199TB 20200TB 20201

l l l l l l l l l l lll l l l l l l

SAULT STE. -SUDBURY MARIE

o'

PROVINCE OP ONTARIO

REVISIONS

for

R. P. BOWEN ENGINEERING INC.

GLEN AUDEN RESOURCES LTD.Title

REGIONAL LOCATION MAP

Dale: Sep 1988Driwn: RPB

Scale: l - 160ml.Approved:

Ftg.1N.T.S.: 42EFile: H-316

GLEN AUDEN RESOURCES LIM

878385 j 878388

'878384 !"8389 ' 87839i ' ....4——— -4——— --4--~

Lake

Nipigon

878383 .878390 j 878393 . j 878400

' X ' f4.———— -l J-——-——1/72232

/j X^ j "7223S 1 - — -f-ft-"-t——- ——

SANDRA TWP SUMMERS,JWP/867029 iWrOi R. P. BOWEN ENGINEERING INC

GLEN AUDEN RESOURCES LTD

CLAIM MAPFrom Map 6-116

l l

Physiography

l The claim block is largely drained by the Sturgeon River or

directly into Lake Nipigon. Relief on the property is roughly

B 300 feet. Glacial drift is generally shallow, less than l meter

B and outcrop is common though generally moss covered. The whole

area is tree covered with spruce, cedar t poplar and birch being

l the most common with jackpine, alder and scrub maple less common.

l Present Survey

The present survey was initiated to complement an induced

l polarization/resistivity survey and to re-examine several old

pits and trenches on the property that had returned fairly

significant gold assays, e.g. from pits on claim 20201 Janbekelo

l Investments reported in 1972 assays of 0.179 ounces of gold/ton

over 12 feet, 0.172 ounces of gold/ton over 2 feet and 0.186

f ounces of gold/ton over 2 feet.

. The method used to survey the property was to traverse grid lines

spaced at 200 meter intervals and to trace outcrop off the grid

l lines where it was found. Old trenches were examined and sampled

in an attempt to verify previous results and to gain first hand

f knowledge of the mineralization and setting.

l Previous Work

Using references from the latest government geological work in

8 the area, Mackasey (1975), a fairly complete mineral exploration

B can be put together.

The earliest recorded work in the area is that of Robert Bell in

l 1869 during his exploration of the Lake Superior region for the

l

l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l

fledgling Geological Survey of Canada. The GSC sent a number of

workers into the area at various times such as Mcinnes in 1894,

Dowling in 1898 and Parks in 1901. The Ontario Bureau of Mines

conducted studies under Coleman (1907) and Coleman and Moore

(1908). The first comprehensive study was conducted by the GSC

under A.W.G. Wilson in 1908 and published as Memoir l in 1910.

With the laying down of the railroad access to the area was

easier and the Ontario Bureau of Mines conducted a survey in

1916, Burrows (1917). Tanton (1921) continued the GSC mapping of

the area and was followed by Langford (1929).

E,L. Bruce (1936) and H.C. Laird (1936) contributed to ntario

Department of Mines Volume 45, Part II which formed the most

comprehensive report on the area up until that time and describes

the mineral deposits in the area at that time. More recently

Peach (1951), Pye (1951) and Horwood and Pye (1955) compiled

detailed information culminating in the geological compilation

Map 2102 by Pye et al (1966). Mackasey (1975) mapped Dorthea,

Sandra and Irwin Townships as part of a concerted effort by the

Ontario Division of Mines to provide detailed basic geological

map coverage of economically important areas.

The Ontario Geological Survey put together a regional compilation

of the Lake Nipigon area at 1:50,000 scale, Sutcliffe (1982).

Airborne magnetic surveys were flown as part of the joint ODM/GSC

program in the 1960's, OGS/GSC (1962).

Funding under the Canada-Ontario Mineral Development Agreement

allowed for a widely spaced overburden drill program to assess

the distribution of gold grains in basal till, Thorleifson and

l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l

Kristjansson (1987) and (1988). For the most part this study did

not investigate the down ice area from the property concerned in

this report.

Mineral Investigations

Figure 3 shows the locations of the various former producing

mines and showings in the area. From an examination of the

geological maps and according the Mackasey (1975) gold is

associated with (1) narrow high grade quartz veins associated

with diorite intrusives such as at the Leitch, Sand River,

Brenbar, and Quebec Sturgeon Mines, (2) gold mineralization

associated with carbonate zones and shearing in metavolcanic

rocks, (3) gold mineralization accompanying chalcopyrite-pyrite

veins cutting intermediate to felsic rocks and 4) gold

mineralization in quartz carbonate veins hosted within iron

formations.

The Leitch and Sand River Gold Mine (l ft, 2)

The Leitch Gold Mine, a past producer from 1936-65, lies on

the border of Eva and Summers Townships. At this mine, high-

grade ore was mined from quartz veins associated with diabase and

diorite dikes, intrusive into graywacke and conformable with

bedding which dips steeply to the north. At the neighboring Sand

River Mine, which was operated by Leitch and which was

interconnected to the Leitch by underground workings, gold

occurred directly above a diabase sheet within a shear zone.

Six different veins within shears and drag folds associated with

the folding are recognized. The veins plunge approximately 75'

to the southwest, averaged 1-2 feet in width and maintained a

l l

remarkable regularity of one to the other throughout the mined

im area.

Mineralization consists of gold, pyrite, scheelite and minor

l amounts of tetrahedrite, sphalerite and bornite (Mason and

Mcconnell, 1983). Sericitization and carbonatization accompany

l the veining. Two of the veins plunge into the Sand River Mine

M immediately to the west (Ferguson, 1967).

These mines were relatively high grade producers (Leitch 0.92

l ounces of gold per ton milled; Sand River 0.32 ounces of gold per

ton milled) which mined ore from narrow quartz veins ranging in

l width from only 4 to 24 inches across.

M Both mines operated while gold sold for $35 per ounce. The total

dividends paid by the Leitch Mine were approximately 5.95 million

l dollars. Assuming that the same proportion of dividends to the

total value of gold milled at the Leitch Mine (19.494) applies to

f the Sand River, the latter earned approximately $360,000 in

M dividends. Combined earnings from both mines would total

* $6,300,000. Assuming mining costs have moved in harmony with the

l price of gold then the present value of these dividends would be

11.4 times greater, depending on the current price of gold. This

l would work out to a profit of $71 I 800,000 for $400.00 gold.

M Brenbar Mine ( 3)

The Brenbar Mine is located in the northeastern corner of Irwin

l Township adjacent to the Quebec Sturgeon River Mine.

At this location intermediate to felsic metavolcanics are cut by

M

auriferous quarts veins also bearing pyrite and minor quantities

of chalcopyrite, galena and sphalerite. The widths of the veins

l ll varies from a few inches to a maximum of 50 inches.

During the period 1934-35 a shaft was sunk on the property to 225

f feet in depth and drifting and cross cutting done on various

^ levels. In 1949 the workings were dewatered by Brenbar Mines and

* 46 tons of ore milled to yield 134 ounces of gold.

l Quebec Sturgeon Mine (4)

The Quebec Sturgeon Mine is located immediately east of the

l Brenbar property. This mine operated between the years 1937 and

1942 producing a total of 73,438 ounces of gold and 15,988 ounces

" of silver from 145,123 tons of ore milled. Ore graded

l approximately 0.50 ounces of gold per ton and derived by hand

cobbing narrow auriferous quartz veins intruding metavolcanics

l and intrusive granodiorite. Records indicate that 1941 reserves

were 111,000 tons grading 0.35 ounces per ton gold.

Northern Empire Mine (5)

l This mine was operated by the Newmont Group and is located just

east of the town of Beardmore in Summers Township. During the

l years 1934-41, 149,493 ounces of gold and 19,803 ounces of silver

were extracted from 425,866 tons of ore milled at an approximate

" grade of 0.35 ounces of gold per ton.

l This mine was the only gold producer from the southern volcanic

belt. Production was from the Power Vein, an echelon quartz-

I carbonate vein which intrudes the mafic volcanics 400 feet south

* of a fault bounded sedimentary volcanic contact (Benedict and

* Titcomb, 1948). Ore was retrieved from this auriferous quartz

l vein composed of lenticular bodies averaging 2 feet in width

being essentially conformable, striking 72* and dipping

l

l l steeply south. This vein cuts intermediate metavolcanics and it

l is in turn cut by a diabase sill or dike. A halo of carbonate

alteration encompasses the productive portion of the vein; where

l carbonate was absent the vein was essentially barren.

Mineralization consisted of gold, arsenopyrite, pyrite,

pyrrhotite and minor chalcopyrite and tourmaline.

l During 1986 and 1987 Norben Gold Resources and Ateba Mines have

been conducting further exploration work on the Northern Empire

l property carrying out power stripping and trenching and over

2,225 meters of diamond drilling to test the extension of the

Empire Power vein. Also uncovered during this program is a new

B zone of mineralization called the contact zone.

Results of drilling as reported in the 29 December 1986

l "Northern Miner" on the extension of the Empire Power vein

include the following:

' Hole # Length (m) Grade (oz/ton Au)

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

86-1 2.25 0.9686-2 4.00 0.1186-4 1.10 2.9486-5 1.70 0.13and 2.00 0.0886-6 2.30 0.1386-7 3.10 0.30and 0.50 0.84

The new vein, the contact zone, is reported in the "Northern

Miner" of 9 March 1987 to consist of stratabound sulfide

a strike length of 175 meters and has an average width of 2.7

meters and through drilling has been found to continue to a depth

of 250 meters.

As of 9 March 1987, 4,300 feet of diamond drilling has been

completed on the contact zone. Information obtained so far leads

lllllllllllllllllll

Ateba to believe that the contact zone contains a possible

111,000 tons of 9.56 grams of gold uncut,

Spooner Prospect (6)

This property is located in Summers Township east of the Northern

Empire Mine. An assay of 0.43 ounces of gold per ton is reported

to have been exposed in an underground working on this property

which is underlain by mafic metavolcanic rocks.

Dorthea Prospect (10) The subject of this report

This property was previously known as the Hopkins claims and

consists of 9 patented claims north of the Namewamikan River

(Sturgeon) in Dorthea Township adjacent to Bish Bay on Lake

Nipigon. The Dorthea property is the location of two major gold

occurrences: (a) narrow high-grade auriferous quartz veins which

have returned assays of several ounces per ton gold; and b) gold-

bearing pyritic dacite which has yielded assays in the range of

0.1 to 0.3 ounces of gold per ton over several feet in width.

The Tyson Property (8)

The Tyson property originally consisted of 36 claims located east

of Bish Bay in Dorthea Township directly northeast of the Dorthea

property. The Tyson claims are the site of quartz veins cross

breccias and small to medium grained mineralized lens. These

quartz veins are principally mineralized with molybdenite

although some gold has made them the subject of sporadic

exploration since the 1930's.

The chief attraction on the Tyson property is the "No. 3" quartz

vein and associated structures which have been traced for several

hundred feet and are molybdenite bearing. In the late 1950's a

l l

B

U

sulfide vein ranging 50-70 feet in width and over 400 feet in

length containing copper and gold was stripped and sampled by

Nortoba Mines.

Subsequent optionees drilled the "No. 3" molybdenite vein and

planned to mine it by a decline, but, a shortage of funds

l terminated the project. This vein reportedly contains 7 } 500 tons

of material grading 1.596 molybdenite.

B In 1964 147.5 tons of material was collected from two quartz

B veins on the Tyson Property and sent to the Leitch mill near

Geraldton and was reported by Tyson to have assayed greater than

l l ounce per ton gold. The Mines Branch in Ottawa analyzed a

select composite sample taken from the same sources as the bulk

m sample and returned assays of 11.99 ounces per ton gold and 3.52

M ounces per ton silver.

Shango Resources Ltd. contracted Terraquest Ltd. to conduct an

l airborne magnetic and VLF-EM survey over the subject property in

1987, Barrie (1987).

l Witwer Property (9)

H The Witwer claim group is located on the boundary of Sandra and

Meader Townships in the vicinity of Musca and Pirum Lakes.

l This property consists of 2 small sulfide veins occupying

intermediate to felsic metavolcanics separated by a distance of

B six hundred feet. The southern, or 4 zone, has been exposed in

U trenches and consists of chalcopyrite and pyrite with minor

amounts of subrounded quartz fragments. The vein measures

l approximately 3 to 4 inches across and can be traced for about 50

feet. Channel samples submitted to the Minerals Research Branch,

l

l

12

I Ontario Division of Mines yielded assays up to IG.8% copper and

0.09 ounces gold per ton and 3.55 ounces silver per ton.

l The B zone" located north of Pirum Lake has similar geology.

*m Several companies have examined the subject claims over the years

and have done considerable work on them. Kimberley Copper Mines

l Limited prepared some notes on the property in 1959. Erie

Canadian Mines in conjunction with the Hopkins-Tyson syndicate

f completed reports (1936), stripping and trenching (1937) and

B Nortoba Mines Limited undertook geophysical surveys, stripping

* and trenching and some drilling in the 1950' s. Further work by

l the Canpac-Tombill-Gunnex Joint Venture was done in the I960* s.

This work is summarized in GDIF 186 by Speed and Perry (1986).

l A small showing was reported on the eastern part of the property

. just south of the northern boundary by Laird (1936) called the

* Lawrence-McKirdy Syndicate. This showing was in a 2m x 8m shear

l with ankerite stringers, quartz and silicified veins and zones

with arsenopyrite, pyrite and galena mineralization. One grab

l sample assayed 0.08 oz/ton Au.

* The geological report by Mackasey (1975) contains further

* information on less important showings in the general area.

l

l

l

l

l

GENERAL GEOLOGY

l l

The rocks underlying the map area are generally of Archean age

l and are generally an east trending folded and faulted sequence of

metavolcanic and metasedimentary rocks. The metavolcanics are

l mafic massive lavas and intermediate pyroclastic breccias and

m tuffs while the metasediments are polymictic

orthoconglomerates, arkoses and siltstones with lesser magnetite

l rich units interbedded with argillites and siltstones.

The metavolcanic and metasedimentary rocks are intruded by

l east trending lenticular bodies of gabbro and granite quartz

m feldspar porphyry. Diabase dikes of Middle to Late Precambrian

(Proterozoic) Age cut all rock units.

l Pleistocene and recent deposits mantle the area in varying

thicknesses from O to well over 50 meters thick. The geological

l history is summarized in Table 1.

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l l

Table l - Table of Lithologic Units for the Glen Auden Property

J CENOZOIC

Quaternary l Recent

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

Swamp, lake and stream deposits

PleistoceneSand, graveli till and clay

Unconformity

* PRECAMBRIANMiddle (Archean) to Late (Proterozoic) Precambrian

Mafic Intrusive Rocks Diabase

Intrusive Contact

Early Precambrian (Archean)

I Mafic Intrusive Rocks

Gabbro

Intermediate to Felsic Intrusive Rocks Granite quartz quartz diorite

Intrusive Contact

l Granite quartz feldspar porphyryi granodiorite,

lChemical Metasedimentary Rocks

Magnetite interbedded with argillite iron-rich rocks

Clastic Metasedimentary Rocks Polymictic argillite

l Polymictic orthoconglomerate, arkose, siltstone,

Intermediate to Felsic Metavolcanic Rocks Pyroclastic breccia, lapilli tuff, ash tuff and derived schists

Mafic Metavolcanic RocksMassive lava, pillow lava

l l

EARLY PRECAMBRIAN (ARCHEAN)

B METAVOLCANIC ROCKS

B Mafic Metavolcanic Rocks

Mafic metavolcanic rocks underlie the northern part of the

property and are composed mainly of massive to pillowed flows

l with lesser amygdaloidal and porphyritic flows and tuffs that

chemically, are iron tholeiite basalts. The whole rock analyses

J presented by Mackasey (1975) were plotted on the Jensen Cation

Plot, Jensen (1975) and the AFM Diagram of Irving and Baragar

(1970) to obtain rock classifications. The computer program used

l to construct the plots was developed by the Ontario Geological

Survey, Ambrose et al (1986).

l The mafic metavolcanic rocks are greenish black on the fresh

surface and weather moderate brown. Most are aphanitic and

rarely are individual minerals discerned at the macroscopic

l scale. Subhedral to euhedral plagioclase crystals l to 2 mm in

size are visible in the porphyritic flow units. Amygdules of

J quartz, calcite and chlorite, l to 3 mm in size are generally

oval in shape indicating some post depositional deformation. The

tuffaceous units are generally thin ^2 m) and are most generally

l sheared. Some secondary minerals can be easily recognized such as

quartz, calcite, ankerite, pyrite, epidote and chlorite.

f Massive mafic lavas were most representative in this group of

. rocks. The units are fine to medium grained and outcrop

exposures are often rounded in a whale-back fashion. The more

l coarse grained flows are thought to be the cores of thicker flows

although Laird (1936) believed them to be intrusive. Indeed,

l

l l l

l

there are some intrusive mafic rocks that will be described under

that heading below, however, no intrusive contacts in the mafic

l metavolcanic units were noted in this survey. It is generally

known that synvolcanic sills and dikes do occur within any

l volcanic pile and there may indeed be many that have not been

recognized in this and previous surveys. The gabbroic bodies may

even be related to mafic volcanism,

l Amygdaloidal lava flows are less common than massive flows and

these units were not traced over any considerable distance. They

l may be just phases in the larger flows or they may have been

m missed under thick moss and other overburden.

Pillow lavas were rare in the overall mafic package and may have

l occurred as zones within the large flow units. Most pillows were

less than 30 cm in the long axis by 10 to 15 cm in the short

l axis. Tops were not reliably noted. Selvages were moderate to

m dark brown in color indicating the presence of iron. The long

axis is generally parallel to the regional foliation.

l Porphyritic flows or portions were noted in several places and

these are though to be phases rather that separate flow units,

l The phenocrysts are l to 3 mm plagioclase crystals that are light

jm gray to grayish yellow in color and generally they are aligned

parallel to the foliation,

l The zones thought to have been of a tuffaceous origin were

generally quite sheared and were generally composed of chlorite

l and sericite with varying degrees of hematite and carbonate

l

l

staining.

l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l

The mafic metavolcanic rock units are confined largely to the

northern part of the map area.

Intermediate to Felsic Metavolcanio Rocks

The bulk of the rocks outcropping on the property fall into this

class and are mainly pyroclastic breccias. This unit or units

strikes on the order of 65* and dips steeply north to vertical.

The rock type underlies the central portion of the property and

has a true thickness of approximately 1.5 km thinning to the

east.

The fragments are very angular and range in size from O mm to

^0 cm. The composition is intermediate to felsic. The matrix

is somewhat darker probably due to the fact the it was less

consolidated than the fragments and therefore more susceptible to

chloritic alteration.

On fresh surface the fragments are light greenish gray and the

matrix is dark greenish black. On weathering the fragments

become greenish white to light brown and the matrix becomes

slightly less dark.

The exposures are most spectacular along the shore of Lake

Nipigon where the wave action has washed the outcrops clean. The

fragments are very visible and layering is evident. Some lapilli

and ash layers are present, however, grading is not. The

fragments are porphyritic with l to 2 mm quartz and feldspar

phenocrysts. Inland the fragmental nature of the unit is less

evident. The moss cover appears to prevent oxidation of the

iron-rich minerals and the matrix and fragments are not readily

discerned.

l

l

18

l Massive, porphyritic and tuffaceous units occur within the

pyroclastic sequence, however, they are not traceable over great

J lengths or widths and are not thought to be extensively developed

on the property.

* Several small felsic pods were mapped. These were often

l associated with sulfide mineralization and could possibly be due

to alteration. Opalescent quartz eyes were generally present as

l was sericite and evidence of shearing.

l MBTASEDIMENTARY ROCKS

Clastic Metasedimentary Rocks

l Clastic metasedimentary rocks underlie the southwestern and south

j central part of the property. These rock types range from

polymictic clast and lesser matrix supported conglomerates

l to sandstones, siltstones and argillites.

l Conglomerates

Traverses over the eastern part of the property crossed a

l polymictic clast supported conglomerate on lines 56 East, 58

East, 60 East and 66 East. This appears to be a bed

" approximately 200 meters thick within a larger metasedimentary

l package and sandwiched between quartzo-feldspathic sandstone

(arkose) to wacke. Some conglomerate was also noted associated

l with the magnetite iron rich unit near the northern boundary of

the sequence. The quartzo-feldspathic material forms the matrix

" of the conglomerates. Clasts range in size from 5 to > 250 mm and

B include felsic plutonic and hypabyssal material with lesser mafic

metavolcanic clasts and quartz, chert and magnetite iron rich

l

lllllllllllllllllll

rock. The conglomerate makes up about 20& of the clastic

metasedimentary package.

Sandstones

The sandstones are primarily arkose to wacke in composition.

Silica may range as high as 70?6. Grading was not evident in the

conglomerates and sandstones. The fresh surfaces are moderate

greenish gray and weather to moderate brown. These units make up

over 65% of the metasedimentary rocks in the map area.

Siltstones and Argillites

Siltstones and argillites near both the conglomerates and to a

larger degree associated with the magnetite iron rich units.

Siltstone and argillite forms bands within the iron rich units

making for what previous authors named "dirty or lean iron

formations". The fine grained metasediments comprise about 15% of

the clastic units. They occur as units up to 50 meters thick and

were noted in close proximity to the conglomerates and associated

with the magnetite iron rich unit that occurs near the north

contact of the metasedimentary sequence.

Chemical Metasedimentary Rocks

This unit is a thin ( <l to 15 meters) bed or several beds

separated by siltstone and argillite, this latter material also

forms beds with the magnetite rich material. This suggests that

the unit may be of sedimentary origin as suggested by Pye (1951)

for the unit near Watson Lake. Some jasper is noted as thin beds

and the units is located within a conglomerate. Quite possibly

lllllllllllllllllll

the iron rich unit could represent a hiatus in the sedimentary

accumulation.

INTRUSIVE ROCKS

Intermediate to Felsic Intrusive Rocks

Several bodies of intermediate to felsic intrusive material were

noted during mapping as well as numerous dikes cutting the

intermediate pyroclastic units. The intrusive is thought to be

hypabyssal in nature due to it's porphyritic nature, however,

there are portions that are not porphyritic. This may indicate a

thicker portion of the body and a slower cooling time. There

were some differences in appearance and mineral content noted and

this suggests multiple intrusive activity if not completely

separate bodies. Alteration of certain parts of the intrusive

also suggest that significant hydrothermal activity accompanied

the emplacement and that this activity continued for some time

after emplacement. The compositions range from granite quartz

feldspar porphyry to granodiorite to quartz diorite,

Mafic Intrusive Rocks

Associated with the magnetite iron rich rocks are gabbro

intrusives. These bodies intrude along the contact between the

clastic metasedimentary sequence and the intermediate pyroclastic

sequence to the north. Mackasey (1975) shows two discrete

gabbroic bodies, however, it is the opinion of this author from

the examination of aeromagnetic data that there is but one

gabbroic body. This body is approximately 75 meters wide and

4,800 meters long. The gabbro is medium grained, l to 3 mm,

l

lmagnetic in places and not in others. It is dark greenish black

P on the weathered surface weathering moderate brown. There is a

m possibility that this unit is a thicker basaltic flow as it does

appear to be conformable to the metasediments and metavolcanics

l and no intrusion breccia units were noted along the contacts. The

l

l

l

coarser grain size could have been the result of metamorphism.

The mafic minerals, amphibole and chlorite compose over 5096 of

the rock with devitrified plagioclase making up the balance of

the rock .

MIDDLE (ARCHEAN) TO LATE PRECAMBRIAN (PROTEROZOIC)

Diabase Sheets and Dikes

Diabase sheets were not found in the map area. At least two

l diabase dikes were noted cutting rock sequences in the map area.

The diabase is generally medium grained (1-3 mm) except at

B contacts. The dikes are usually 50 meters or so in width and of

B varying lengths. Fault offsets are common. Mafic minerals make

up over 5096 of the diabase and are pyroxene, magnetite, and

l lesser amounts of biotite and sulfides, generally pyrite and

pyrrhotite.

l

l

l

l

l

22

l

lCENOZOIC

l QUATERNARY

B Pleistocene and Recent

The outcrop in the map area is largely covered with a thin {l to

l 5 meter) cover of glacial clay, silt and sand. Most of the

outcrop is found south of Tie Line 20+00 East north of which is a

8 broad swamp largely devoid of outcrop, although cover is thought

m to be shallow, until about 200 meters south of the northern

boundary of the claims where outcrop is once again noted. Near

l the Sturgeon River thick deposits of stratified sand and gravel

can be seen. These were measured by Coleman (1907) and found to

8 be on the order of 30 meters of silt overlain by 4 meters of sand

M and gravel just east of the property.

METAMORPHISM

Metamorphic rank is greenschist for the older rocks. The diabase

l is largely unaltered. The chlorite content and the devitrified

nature of the feldspars are the main indicators of metamorphic

l activity and rank.

l STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY

The package of rocks underlying the property in in the Wabigoon

8 Subprovince, Goodwin (1970). This subprovince is composed

m primarily of metavolcanic and granitic rocks. The rock sequence

has been isoclinally folded about and east-west axis and tops are

B generally to the north. Regional foliation is just north of east

and dips are generally steeply to the north. Minor folds are

8 noted and as are minor faults and joints. These are most evident

l

BEflRDMQRE M-316

01 C O

O LL-

O

01•11o a.

--Ero u)

NO. OF PTS. : e

figure 3 - Equal area plot of poles of foliations.

l lg in the iron rich units. Lineation parallel to foliation is the

™ greatest with that down dip and slightly to the west of secondary

l intensity with compression perpendicular to the foliation noted.

Numerous northwest trending cross faults were noted where

f lithologic units were offset. These were generally on the order

— of less than 100 meters. Strike slip faults were not noted on

" the property, however, there may be a suggestion of one such

B fault along the contact between the intermediate pyroclastic unit

and the metasedimentary sequence.

l Various authors, Goodwin (1951), Pye (1951) and Mackasey (1975)

have proposed that the Wabigoon-Quetico subprovince boundary be

™ the Paint Lake Fault which passes approximately 4 km north of the

B north boundary of the property. Recent work by Williams (1986)

proposes an accretionary prism model for the Beardmore-Geraldton

l Greenstone Belt. This model defines a prism made up of trench

— and fore-arc sedimentary material interleaved with layers of

™ mafic volcanics and gabbros, cut by mildly discordant gabbros and

B granitic major and minor intrusions. The boundary between the

Wabigoon and Quetico subprovinces is marked by a zone of ductile

l and brittle shear.

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

ll *

STRATIGRAPHY

B Based strictly on top directions and surface mapping it would

B suggest that the metasedimentary sequences are the oldest rocks

and the metavolcanic sequences are younger. Examination of the

l conglomerates indicates both metavolcanic and metasedimentary

clasts as well as a considerable percentage of mafic and felsic

8 plutonic clasts. Laird (1936) indicates the lavas to be the

m older while Mackasey (1975) indicates that the Metasediments are

older with a disclaimer that sequence does not imply age

l relationship. Age dates reported by Williams (1986) relate to

the age of metamorphism and indicate the metamorphic event was

B caused by late stage felsic plutons to the south well within the

B Quetico Subprovince. Until further detailed age dating

information is available conventional stratigraphic indicators

will have to be relied on.

GEOPHYSICS

Airborne geophysical surveys by the government OGS/GSC (1962a ft

g b), Figure 3, indicate the general stratigraphic trend. More

^ detailed airborne surveys for Shango Resources Ltd., Barrie

™ (1987) show increased detail and color enhancement and vertical

8 derivative calculations provide further enhancement of the data.

This detail defines the diabase dike trends and indicates that

l the gabbro accompanies the magnetite iron rich rocks over a

B considerable length but do not continue throughout the full

length of the unit east of the property and that the gabbro

l appears to terminate near the mouth of the Sturgeon River.

An IP survey was conducted by Glen Auden and will be reported on

l

IRWfN

RBalllsi**:

Scale: One Inch to One Mile =

GEOPHYSICS P

SHAKESPEARE REVIS1ONS\ R.P. BOWEN. ENGINEERING INC

SUMMERS GLEN AUDEN RESOURCES LTD.

AEROMAGNETIC MAPOGS/GSC 1962a fc b

Oafg:Seo m8\Drawn;RPB \SczfrT'r1 mile

l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l

separately in another report. This survey delineated a number of

chargeable zones and trends that do not merely appear to be

associated with zones of known mineralization thereby increasing

the targets tagged for follow-up work.

GEOCHEMISTRY

There were no whole rock analyses made of samples on the subject

claims nor were any soil or other geochemical surveys performed.

Whole rock data was taken from Mackasey (1975) and plotted on

ternary plots using programs developed by the Ontario Geological

Survey, Ambrose et al (1986), Figures 6 and 7. Samples 2 and 3

are from the subject claims and plot as magnesium tholeiite and

basaltic komatiite respectively. Sample 4 is from the

intermediate pyroclastic breccia unit and plots as a tholeiitic

andesite although it is very close to the boundary of the calc

alkaline basalt.

Figure 7 is a QAP plot and sample 5 is a granite quartz feldspar

porphyry west of Pirum Lake in the north part of Sandra Township

and sample 7 was a granodiorite from the Quebec Sturgeon Mine in

northeast Irwin Township. The author believes that the felsic to

intermediate plutonic rocks mapped on the property would be of

similar composition.

The relatively thin mantle of overburden would perhaps make

geochemical surveys a practical method of exploration in this

area and should perhaps be tried using gold as the main

pathfinder with perhaps arsenic and silver as associated trace

indicators. Primary rock geochemistry should be used as an

JENSEN CRT ION PLOT

Fe3 * Fe2 * Ti

CL.

acLU

DC O O

Mg

Figure 5 - Jensen cation plot.

l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l

29

D

cd -P

-OOLU

o

d.IL.

CE

rLL.

au

*C4-OJ

CC

nnRT

HFfl TWP

l p > -o

D ID r~ o

l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l

31

l

lexploration tool over areas of felsic to intermediate intrusives

m and altered and mineralized zones.

l CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

^ Some targets already present themselves such as the Low and High

™ Grade showings which should be tested by diamond drilling

l underneath the showings. Induced polarization/resistivity

targets coinciding with felsic to intermediate intrusives should

l also be tested by diamond drilling. Soil geochemical surveys

— would help define zones for stripping and trenching and primary

' geochemical surveys would provide more data on host rock and

B alteration which might lead to additional stripping and diamond

drill targets. A close spaced geophysical survey program should

l be done consisting of magnetometer and horizontal loop surveys

— which would assist in further defining stratigraphy and perhaps

™ providing areas for further IP work.

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

1111111111111111111

9

32

REFERENCES

Ambrose, E., Wright, D., Volk, W. P.1986:

Barrie, C. Q.1987:

Benedict, P. C.1948:

Bruce, E. L.1936:

Burrows, A. G.1917:

Coleman, A. P.1907

Coleman, A, P. ,1908

Energy, Mines

1988:

Ferguson, S. A.1967:

Krez, D.1987

STRNET, TERNARY Plots; Computer Programs Availableto the Precambrian Section, Ontario GeologicalSurvey.

Report on an Airborne Magnetic and VLF-EM Survey,Dorthea, Eva and Sandra Townships, Thunder BayMining Division, Ontario; Report for ShangoResources Ltd. by Terraquest Ltd.

, and Titcombe, J. A.The Northern Empire Mine; p. 389-399 in StructuralGeology of Canadian Ore Deposits, CanadianInstitute of Mining and Metallurgy Jubilee Volume,948 P.

The Eastern Part of the Sturgeon River Area;Ontario Department of Mines, Vol. 45, Pt. 2, P. 1-59 (published 1937). Accompanied by Map 45a,scale 1 inch to 1 mile.

Longuelac to Jellicoe and Orient Bay; OntarioBureau of Mines, Vol. 26, p. 227-247. Accompaniedby Map 26b, scale 1 inch to 2 miles.

Iron Ranges East of Lake Nipigon; Ontario Bureauof Mines, Vol. 16, Pt. 1, p. 105-135.

and Moore, E. S.Iron Ranges East of Lake Nipigon; Ontario Bureauof Mines, Vol. 17, p. 136-169.

and Resources

First Vertical Derivative of Total Field MagneticData in the Beardmore-Geraldton Area.

Leitch Gold Mines Limited, Surface Plan of EasternPart of Property, parts of Eva and SummersTownships, District of Thunder Bay; OntarioDepartment of Mines, Preliminary Geological MapP. 484, scale 1 inch to 500 feet.

Geology of Barbara, Meader and Pifher Townships,District of Thunder Bay; Ontario GeologicalSurvey, Preliminary Map, scale 1 inch to J mile.

l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l

33

Laird, H.C. 1936:

Langford, G.B, 1928:

The Western Part of the Sturgeon River Area {Sturgeon River-Beardmore Section); Ontario Department of Mines, Vol. 45, Pt. 2, p. 60-117 (published 1937). Accompanied by Map No. 45a, scale l inch to l mile.

Geology of the Beardmore-Nezah Gold Area, Thunder Bay District; Ontario Department of Mines, Vol. 37, Pt. 4, p. 83-108 (published 1929). Accompanied by Map 37k, scale l inch to l mile.

Macdonald, A.J.1983a: The Iron Formation - Gold Association: Evidence

from Geraldton Area; p. 75-83 in the Geology of Gold in Ontario, edited by A.C. Colvine, Ontario Geological Survey, Miscellaneous Paper 110, 278 p.

1983b A reappraisal of the Geraldton Camp; p. 194-197 in Summary of Field Work, 1983, by the Ontario Geological Survey, edited by John Wood, Owen L. White, R.B. Barlow and A.C. Colvine, Ontario Geological Survey, Miscellaneous Paper 116, 313 p.

Mackasey, W.O.1975: Geology of Dorthea, Sandra and Irwin Townships,

District of Thunder Bay; Ontario Division of Mines, GR 122, 83 p. Accompanied by Map 2294, scale l inch to i mile.

Mason, J.K. and Mcconnell, C.D.1983: Gold Mineralization in the Beardmore-Geraldton

Area; p. 84-97, in The Geology of Gold in Ontario, edited by A.C. Colvine, Ontario Geological Survey, Miscellaneous Paper 110, 278 p.

OGS/GSC1962a:

1962b:

Peach, P,A, 1951:

Aeromagnetic Map of the Beardmore, Ontario Area, Geophysical Paper 2135, scale l inch to l mile.

Aeromagnetic Map of the Shakespeare Island, Ontario Area, Geophysical Paper 2128, scale l inch to l mile.

Preliminary Report on the Geology of the Blackwater-Beardmore Area; Ontario Department of Mines, Preliminary Report 1951-7, 6 p.

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

Pye, E.G.1951: Geology of Errington Township, Little Long Lac

Area; Ontario Department of Mines, Vol. 60, Pt. 6, 140 p. (published 1952). Accompanied by Map 1951- 7, scale l inch to 1,000 feet.

1965: Georgia Lake Area; Ontario Department of Mines, GR 31, 113 p. Accompanied by Map 2056, scale l inch to l mile.

1968: Lac des Iles Area; Ontario Department of Mines, GR 64, 47 p. Accompanied by Map 2135, 2136, scale l inch to i mile.

Pye, E.G., Harris, H.R., Fenwick, K.G., and Bailie, J.1966: Tashota-Geraldton Sheet; Ontario Department of

Mines, Map 2102, scale l inch to 4 miles.

Skimming, T.1982: Report on the Property of Janbekelo Investments

Limited, Dorthea Township, District of Thunder Bay; Qualifying Report for Janbekelo Investments Limited.

Stott, G.M.1983: Gold Mineralization in the Shebandowan Belt and

its Relation to Regional Deformation Patterns; p. 181-193 in The Geology of Gold in Ontario, edited by A.C. Colvine, Ontario Geological Survey, Miscellaneous Paper 110, 278 p.

Sutcliffe, R.H.1982: Precambrian Geology of the Wabigoon-Quetico

Subprovince Boundary, Grand Bay Sheet, Map P.2528, Shakespeare Island Sheet, Map P.2529, Orient Bay Sheet, Map P.2530 and Black Sturgeon Lake Sheet, Map P.2531, Geological Series Preliminary Maps, scale 1:50,000. Geology 1981.

Tanton, T,L.1921: Canadian National Railway between Long Lac and

Nipigon; Geological Survey of Canada Summary Report 1917, Pt. E, p. 1-16.

Thorleifson, L.H. and Kristjansson, F.J.1987: Gold Grains in Surface Till Samples, Beardmore-

Geraldton Area, District of Thunder Bay; Ontario Geological Survey, Map P.3105, Geological Series Preliminary Map, scale 1:100,000. Geology 1986, 1987.

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

Thorleifson, L.H. and Kristjansson, F.J.1988: Visible Gold Content and Lithology of Till From

Overburden Drillholes, Beardmore-Geraldton Area, District of Thunder Bay, Northern Ontario; Geological Survey of Canada Open File Report 1756.

von Hessert, C.1986: A Summary Report to Canergy Resources Ltd. on

their 1986 Staking, Dorthea Township, District of Thunder Bay, Ontario; Report for Canergy Resources Ltd., by C. von Hessert fc Associates Ltd.

Williams, H.R.1986: Structural Studies in the Beardmore-Geraldton

Belt, Northern Ontario; Grant 242, p. 138-146 in Geoscience Research Grant Programs, Summary of Research, 1985-1986, edited by V.G. Milne, Ontario Geological Survey, Miscellaneous Paper 130, 235 p.

Wilson, A.G.W.1910: Geology of the Nipigon Basin, Ontario; Geological

Survey of Canada, Memoir l, 152 p.

l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l

CERTIFICATION

I, R.P. Bowen, P. Eng., of 142 Eric Crescent, Porcupine, Province of Ontario, certify as follows concerning my report on the Dorthea and Eva Townships, Ontario property of Glen Auden Resources Limited and dated 30 September 1988.

1) I am a member in good standing of:a) The Association of Professional Engineers of the

Province of Ontariob) The Canadian Institute of Mining and Metallurgyc) The Society of Mining Engineers of the A.I,M.E.d) The American Society of Photogrammetry and Remote

Sensing

2) I am a graduate of Michigan Technological University, Houghton, Michigan with a B.S. degree in Geological Engineering in 1970 and a B.S. degree in Engineering Administration obtained in 1971,

3) I am a graduate of Me Gill University, Montreal,Quebec with a Graduate Diploma in Geological Sciences obtained in 1972 and a M.Se. (Applied) in Minerals Exploration obtained in 1973.

4) I have been practicing my profession in Canada and the United States for the past 19 years.

5) I have no direct interest in the properties, leases or securities of Glen Auden Resources Limited nor do I expect to receive any.

6) The attached report is the product of:a) Data listed in the references,

b) Assessment work files - Thunder Bay ResidentGeologist's Office and the Toronto Assessment Records Office.

c) Discussions with colleagues who have worked in the area.

d) My personal acquaintance with the Beardmore- Geraldton gold belt and other properties in the area, some of which I have examined and worked on for other companies.

e) A personal visit to map the property 14 September through 30 September 1988.

Dated this 30th day of September 1988. Timmins, Ontario.

R.P. Bowen, P.Eng,

Minis'.ry Ot Northern and Mines

Report of Work

(Geophysics!, Geoloijical, Geochi.'inica! and

Mining Act

Please type or-- II numl)cr ol mining claims liiivcrsud

exceeds space on this form, attach a list.Mote: — Only d;iys credits calculated lit l hi:

"Expenditures" section may lie enteredin the "Expend. Days Cr." columns.

— Do not useshaded areaj^ ttflow.eas Itflow. f\JL*Jb G 'r y l)*: ol Survey's'

.^^^VCrjl C

Townsh.por Area

^o p-o- 6c-x /637 T t rf H i r* s Ct^roir '.''V Compiiny

f\ ^) / .///'•V ?CCr f C'A,' >^ •*V'iLO*\*H ' i OV- ' ^^/\•V." .- ;m'i Adflr^s 1. O* Author (of Gco-1 fJcnnir.nt rcpoi t'

-*~^ -^ —) ^ ^, x ,^—j ^ —j

42E12NW0152 2.11825 SANDRA

i l ^f / o^ / c&ro i)o/ ^7 / 13900

Cftjdiis Requested per Each Claim in Columns at liyhtSp".. ',il Provisions

Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)

Date

A?v?7P^t f " ' -f f f f ———— —— V —---- r------ —— -

Certification Verifying RepprTpf j/Vork——————————— s — * —— -^tL-^ ——————————————————— 1 hereby certify that 1 have a personal and ;n: r-vit- : K-r-v-.'ieri.io of the f;i or witnessed same ilumici and 01 ;ifli?r us iiomp i-;i-.- . ; --u tlu ."•ni.'xt-ii "

\.I-M! Hntl Costal Arlurcss ol Po'i.m Ci"'''v -")

PV/J 7^ P,

:*.s set /onh .r. the Report of Work annexed ^-?reio, having performed ooi t is ti ue.

/•?r^ /^. V? 7/^;-^; S f x-r

the work

Oaiu Cer^.fied C*rt*fvi^xt)V (Signjtutc) ,

' SCHEDULE "A" GLEN AUDEN RESOURCES LIMITED

J 54 CLAIMS - DORTHEA AND EVA TOWNSHIPS A THUNDER BAY MINING DIVISION - ONTARIO

867026

867027

867028

867029

867030

872223

872224

872225

872226

872227

872228

872229

872230

872231

872232

872233

872234

872235

872236

872237

872238

872239

872240

872241

872244

872245

R79947

872248

872249

878381

878382

878383

8783841

878385

878386

878387

878388

878389

878390

878391

878392 r r:

878393 :t': '; ^

878394 ^ : ;

878395 r?. . - :: :.": rv.

878396 Jr.! ' :

878397 ^

878398

878399

878400

878401

i00007fr k^UtJLMji

i^on o? n— j[f 6***tjjltjL.

1-000000 6^*^xJL^U)L

l l l l l l l l l l l l l l

1oll l

Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines

Geophysical-Geological-Geochemical Technical Data Statement

ntario

TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT

TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.

Type of Survey(s) LJnecuttlng - GeologicalTownship or Area Do r t h ea, Sandra, Eva (Poplar Point) Claim Holder(s) Glen Auden Resources Limited————

Survey Company H.P. Bowen Engineering; Inc.——^—Author of Report B. P. Bowen—-—————^—^^^.———-Address of Author P.O. Box 5010, PMS, S. Pornuplna

Covering Dates of Survey 3-35 P^b- ft lj^-30 Sep. 1 Qftft

Total Miles of Line Cut^(line cutting to office)

53-5 miles

SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED

ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.

ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.

Geophysical --Electromagnetic.

DAYSper claim

Geological 20

AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credits do not apply to airborne surveys)

Magnetometer. .Electromagnetic(enter days per claim)

DATE:—C'

Res. Geol. . Qualifications (7\ ~ 0(04. D fPrevious Surveys

File No. Type Date Claim Holder

MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically

'(prefix) (number)

867

8722

31

...........1L?.?.ZilL?I g? "ilia

&7Z2-17

TOTAL CLAIMS-

837

GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA

GROUND SURVEYS- If more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey

Number of Stations

l

INDUCED POLARIZATION

ppcTCTTVTTV GRAVITY ELECTROMAGNETIC MAGNETIC

Station interval Line spacing

Profile scale

Contour interval

Instrument

Accurary — Scale constant

Diurnal correction method

Rase Station check-in interval (hours)

Rase Station location and value .

Instrument

Coil ronfiguration

Coil reparation

AccuracyMethod: O Fixed transmitter O Shoot back CD In line Frequency

{specify V.L.F. station)

Parameters measured

Instrument

Scale constantCorrertions made

Base station value and location

Elevation accuracy . ... ...,~

Instniment —————————————————————————— — ——

Method D Time Domain D Frequency DomainP3r3mf*tcrs On time rrccjucncy.

, Off time Range(! Delay time4

l — Integration timeJ D

5 Power ____ - —— - ————————— - ————————————————————— - ———————li 4

Electrode array ———————————————— - ————————————————————— - ———————

Electrode spacing . ———— . ———————————————————————————————— - ———————

Type of electrode _____ ———— . ——— - ———————————————————————————————————————

11111I

1CD Parallel line —

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

SELF POTENTIALInstrument.,

Survey Method

Corrections made

RADIOMETRICInstrument.

Values measured

Energy windows (levels)

Height of instrument

Size of detector

Overburden

Range

Background Count

(type, depth — include outcrop map)

OTHERS (SEISMIC, DRILL WELL LOGGING ETC.)Type of survey

Instrument

Accuracy

Parameters measured

Additional information (for understanding results).

AIRBORNE SURVEYSType of survey(s)Instrument(s) —————————————————————— — — - ————————

(specify for each type of survey) Accuracy

(specify for each type of survey) Aircraft used

Sensor altitude.Navigation and flight path recovery method

Aircraft altitude

Miles flown over total area

Line Spacing

Over claims only

GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY

Numbers nf rlaims from whirh samples taken

Total Number nf Samples

Type nf Sample(Nature of Material)

Average Sample Weight.O I U

Method of Collection,

Snjl Horizon SamplpH

Horizon DevelopmentSample Depth

Terrain

Drainage D^vH^pmentEstimated Ranpp nf Overburden Thirkness

SAMPLE PREPARATION(Includes drying, screening, crushing, ashing)

Mesh size nf fraction used for analysis.

(General

- PROCEDURE RECORD A ™

A NI AT VTIP A T MPTUnnc

Values expressed in: per cent d p. p. m. d p.p. b. d

Cu, Pb, Zn, Ni, Co, Ag, Mo, As.-(circle)

OthersFielrl Analysis (. tests)

Extrartion Method

Analytiral Methnrl

Reagents Used

Field Laboratory AnalysisNo. ( tests)

Extraction Method

Analytical Method .,,Reagents Used

rnmmerrral Laboratory ( tests)

Name of Laboratory.

F.vtrartinn Methnd

Analytical Method,,,Reapents Used

General . —————————————————————————

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

11 *

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED Lost numerically

; ' '-'#72.246 "(prefix) - ' jlnumbet)

#72-^4-4

27ZZ4.T27Z-Z47

C) Tl 5 7 ̂ 4 C^* | C- C. "^ LJ

6?az47#723^1

a?^a2e^?g.?f*^2 ^? ? ^? j9

878285-?7^3^^

87^ ^7

(5 t fj ^ ^ ̂ *o? "jjT C? 7^ C ^\^ l ^? J C* r

ZfgZJoat&^i818 ^lB7S3^53763^487^19 T

T/^T AI fi AIMC ^ \T~*^\

-

1

\i

uria

MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically

Cf ry o t? ^o/ c? T ^5 5 s fa(prefix) - (number)

gj"3O J 9 C

970\ ?^) 0 C?' t) &S S

@7f\4oQg754o/

/^o9o7S/^^o?9/O^^OSO/^o^ 0g/

TOTAF.CI.AIMS *5" 4*

*

l rt1rfIuia

Meader Two. G - 168

- ,- - 5 M

901110 writ i 107771H6^^f , B632541883233

u^M'iwt\n"^ i^jg&iijP*?(Cr^"X^y r"^ y i i —

^afeiw.'nfc^'wW/i^wfcfcfc, ^tn-min^U* X^y0 ''*b'•i y .——- , t—— ..~-, .-.. ..^ . . . -i.. ,. .. .j ̂ .. i ^ IM — ...

H6I732 1 861744 1861 i* 43

86l76e7xl86l 7621661763 661764

l "- — --l— 1---. 4 M

J4JI40 J747I4I 1747I4Z 747.43 1/47,44r™ — *— —-J— *— i f T 11

1/47121 747120 747119 |747IIB 747117 -—---——-————-----""-----

7 X

V7v^7 ^^ ;7 i '"'t i

SM 1M

42E12NW8152 2.11825 SANDRA200

Summers Twp. G-165

CD

O

cL

h-

c

—.|L..

OTIU K H oAUi

T H A U S — -

SUHVfcYtl) t I Nt: !iTOWNSHIPS, B ASL l INtS, t li: —— -LOTS, M INING CI AIMS. PARC! L b, 1 1C - --

UNSUHVtYKU l.INI SLOT L INI SPARCU. BOUNOAHYMINING CI AIMS \ T C

RAII W AY ANIl R IGHT Ol WAV H——

UTILITY L INI S ^~

NON-P[:RI N NIAI b ] H I AM

FLOODING OR f LOUMNG H (GUI S : .^

SUBDIVISION OH COMPOSITE PLAN 77?'

Rf * ; fRVATIONS mZT.

ORIGINAL SHORt LINI .......

MARSH O H MUSKEG c ^*-

MINES

TRAVKRSI MONUMbN!

DISPOSITION OF CROWN LANDS

TYPF OF DOCUMENTPATF.NT, StJRF-ACI. tt. MINING RIGHTS

, SUM f AfT HlliHlSONLY

, MINING RIGHISONLY .... .

LLASE SUHI AU: .S/ MINING RIGHTS

, SURFAt i HluHTSONt Y. .^...

" . MINING MIGHTS ONI Y. .. . ..

l IChNCl. i.i uLCUPA! ION . .. .

onni ii IN

SYMBOL

a u v

oc

CAM i i l.LO

SAND^ GRAVLL

NOTE: M iNiN(i H inn i;. IN HAHCLLS P ATENTED fRiOH T O M AY 6.iyi3. V t-SfID IN MHIC.INAL H ATENIEE B V l M! P UQLIC LANDS A CT H.S.Ci 1 U/U, CHAP 3HO. S EC 6 -1. SUBSl.C 1

SCAU:: 1 INCH - 40 CHAINS

FU lO UK) D 4i)00 hOOO

——^——————————T*———UIKKJ

O I'OO ML l H t. a

Hl'.iu l KMi

J (JOG'z K M;

TOWNSHIP

SANDRAM.N R. ADMINISTRATIVE DISTRICT

NIPIGONMINING DIVISION

THUNDER BAYLAND TITLES /REGISTRY DIVISION

THUNDER BAY

Ministryof LandNatural ManagementResources Branch

Ontario

G-167Jm UKIK 'i' If n mar mm iimm-—

NOTES

MUNGO PARK POINT G-92

. r^r

Lake

IQBI4BS 1081484l -t*^, ""^ """"^ ' '——** ^

IOB1470 [ 1 08147^' IOdM7BSANDRA TPB4i

FOR STATU REFER TO TP

IO832&1 IDB32B5 ' 1063284 1 063265^ ^~ TB

107789 107790 IU779I1063286 1083263 1 083W*

'mMmww.

N i p i g on

UMMERS, TP-i 65

STATUS REFER TO TP PLAN————— ——. ——— -. ^ ., . .

Poplar Lodge T "W1"^*^*02 3 l- i^^nft T ^^-,

^7"f42 l 13712 l I37H l faTJO

©I ©j © (D

MARYJANE LAKE42E12NWei52 2.11825 SANDRA 496 8BI

Reserve flooding rights on Lake Nipigon to contour elevation 855* to Ont. Hydro. O.C. dated 25th April 1930. File 12198 Also reserve 66* from 855'contour to Ont. Hydro.

AREAS WITHDRAWN FROM DISPOSITION

S.R. - SURFACE RIGHTS M.R. -MINING RIGHTS

Description Order No. Di** Disposition F ile

Sac. 43 of Mm Act 7/8/70 SRO 103414

LEGEND

HIGHWAY AND ROUTE No.

OTHER ROADS

TRAILS -

SURVEYED LINES:TOWNSHIPS, BASE LINES, ETC.LOTS, MINING CLAIMS, PARCELS, ETC.

UNSURVEYED LINES:LOT LINESPARCEL BOUNDARYMINING CLAIMS ETC.

RAILWAY AND RIGHT OF WAY -*

UTILITY LINES

NON-PERENNIAL STREAM ~

FLOODING OR FLOODING RIGHTS

SUBDIVISION OR COMPOSITE PLAN

RESERVATIONS

ORIGINAL SHORELINE

MARSH OR MUSKEG

MINES

TRAVERSE MONUMENT

DISPOSITION OF CROWN LANDS

TYPE OF DOCUMENT SYMBOL

PATENT, SURFACE 6 MINING RIGHTS J...— ..™——. *

SURFACE RIGHTS ONLY.—-----™-™.—-. O

! " .MINING RIGHTS ONLY ____.._..M.......... O

LEASE SURFACE fc MINING R IGHTS —— —.-.-™.™™" H

" .SURFACE RIGHTS ONLY..l..-.......-M....... H

" , MINING RIGHTS ONLY.......__r..m.^,......^. y

LICENCE OF OCCUPATION ^1..._._.^.-......—-^. T

ORDER IN COUNCIL ........._^.......— ..,......-^—. OC

RESERVATION ___-,^-T _..'....—-r.._.—......_. ©

CANCELLED ___.^——.__—..^-...^............—., ®

SAND A GRAVEL ___....____^,..l—_.^.......^... ©

NOTE: M INING RIGHTS IN PARCELS PATE NTED PH IOR TO MAY 6, 19t3. VESTED IN ORIGINAL PATENTEE BY THE PUBLIC LANDS ACT. R.SO- 1970, CHAP. 380, SEC. 63, SUBSEC l

AREA

POPLAR POINTM.N.R. ADMINISTRATIVE DISTRICT

NIPIGONMINING D IVISION

THUNDER BAYLAND T ITLES/ REGISTRY DIVISION

THUNDER BAY

Ministry ofNaturalResources

Land

Management

BranchOntario

DadFEBRUARY 1981

15, f 9 f S

Numb ir

G-116

LEGE

ND

CENO

ZOIC

OUAT

ERNA

RYRe

cent

Lake

, st

ream

and

swa

mp

depo

sits

Plei

stoc

ene Sa

nd,

grav

el,

clay

PREC

AMBR

IAN

HDOL

E (A

RCHE

AN)

to U

TE (P

ROTE

ROZO

IC)

PREC

AMBR

IAN

Maf

ic In

trusiv

e Ro

cks.

7a

Diab

ase

INTR

USI

VE C

ON

TAC

T

EARL

Y PR

ECAM

BRIA

N (A

RCHE

AN)

5+00

N

4+00

N

3+00

N

2+00

N

00 N

BL

0+

00

1+00

S

2+00

S

3+00

S

4+

00 S

Maf

ic In

trusiv

e Ro

cks

6a

Gabb

ro

55a 5b C

.rInte

rmed

iate

to

Felsi

c In

trusiv

e Ro

cks

Gra

nite

qua

rtz f

elds

par

porp

hyry

Gra

nodi

orite

GLu

artz

di

orite

INTR

US

IVE

CO

NTA

CT

MET

AVOL

CANI

C Af

ib M

ETAS

EDIM

ENTA

RY R

OCKS

Chem

ical

Met

ased

imen

tary

Roc

ks

^

Mag

netit

e in

terb

edde

d w

ith a

rgill

ite i

ron-

rich

rock

s

Clas

tic M

etas

edim

enta

ry R

ocks

3a

3b

3c

3d

Poly

mic

tic o

rthoc

ongl

omer

ate

Ark

ose

Silt

ston

eA

rgill

ite

Inte

rmed

iate

to

Felsi

c M

etav

okan

ic Ro

cks

2a

2b

2c

Pyr

ocla

stic

bre

ccia

Lapi

lli tu

ffAs

h flo

w t

uff a

nd d

eriv

ed

schi

sts

Maf

ic M

etav

olca

nic

Rock

s

'a

Mas

sive

lav

aIb

Pi

llow

lav

a

31+0

0 N

30+

00 N

31+0

0 N

30+

00 N

22+

00 N

21+0

0 N

20+

00 N

19+0

0 N

18+0

0 N

17+0

0 N

Xw

'Xl

i* •u-

^*,

1a

HIGH

GRA

DE12

6227

1262

2862

29

1262

1812

6219 V1

2621

2 12

6213

12

62U

Aqv,

py,

cpg""

'

TL

3 + 2

5

N

12+0

0 N

1+00

N

10+0

0 N

9+00

N

8+00

N

7+00

N

6+00

N

5+00

N

4+

00

N

3+00

N

2+00

N

00 N

BL

0+

00

+00

S

2+00

S

3+00

S

SY

MB

OL

S

/'

c

feu

0•\

f x*S

^

d* m O +

ir/

s

yyx* y?x~

yyx. y* L

y\7

/

-t-7-

X

i**r

.

UtM

Vt/

l \V

\.

tot H r.^

^i^T'.

sjr"11 h

*1* u-

. dd

hiuU

wfcM

t *t t

t**

-**^

Ktli

^ ^

*"dt

rt dw

*M. *

ta*"

ta v

tor

——

*rM

Pto

MK

flM

Mri

M.

Sm*/

/ bed

rock

out

crop

.

ATM

of b

edro

ck tu

tere

p.

Bedd

ing,

hor

ltont

tl.

Bedd

ing,

top

unkn

own;

(Inc

lined

, r*

rtic*

l).

Bedd

ing,

(op

Inci

ted

bf i

"w;

(incl

ined

, nrH

ctl,

wffi

urne

d).

Bedd

ing,

top

(t"*

**) fro

m p

ct/n

ot*

d-

ttion

; (In

clin

ed, f

ertfc

^. o

rtrjy

rrwrf)

.

Bedd

ing,

top (

nrow

)fnm

cro

u be

ddin

g;

(Incl

ined

, r*f

1*c*

/. Br*

rfwfn

**J.

SetW

inff,

(op

(*"

owj

f"wn

rel

ethn

shlp

of

clet

vta*

*na

bed

dino

; (in

clin

ed o

ver

turn

ed).

ltve

(to*;

top (

ffow

) fio

m pi

llows

shtp

emn

d po

ckin

g.

Schi

stos

ity; (

honi

ontm

l, in

clin

ed,

verti

cil).

Mot

ion;

(hw

'iool

t/. in

clin

ed,

rerti

ceJ)

.

t-H

^X

4XX

*rx

Gne

issos

ity, (

nvim

niv,

intiw

™,

rtri

tctt)

.

Bind

lno;

(Apr

tow

W. '

nc'"

^' "

rtte*

7)l

Join

ting;

(hw

InnW

* In

clin

ed, v

ertic

il).

Xlin

eatio

n w

ith p

lung

e.

^*—

~^~

~ G

toto

etci

t bo'

-ndt

ry, o

bser

ved.

.^

Geof

oC'ca

' boo

ndvf

. pos

ition

in

terp

rete

d.

——

——

7Z3

Geot

ooic

tloou

ndvy

. ded

uced

from

-*

' \

oeop

hr*i

c*-

s*Li

neim

ent o

f fmu

tt.

•.

f,,,*;

fob

s""*

. •W

U"*

").

5pj*

/nr

fj-^f^

Ol

cite

s Jo

wn

Iftre

* iW

e. -"

O""

(no'

c''"

^ *

j ho

rlio

nW n

w*m

*nf.

^s K

wss±

s !Tt4"

Jsatw-

"ax-

fiE

r1 H

bi

ll tr

t H

Iw

M-

1 "-

~^u ^

y

OrlO

fold

s wX

h pl

unge

.

^*~

An

ticlin

e. s

rncl

ine,

w.th

plu

nge,

•i*

[o-c

X

c^"^

c r̂ o

Sii

r

a,*r

a"'

}OTr

*ncK

M

MET

AL

^A

*" * X

&"*"

1*"

tQ

uif

fjf

Df III

koto

; (ve

rticd

. inc

lined

).

Drill

hole;

(pro

fecled

ver

lkttf

f, pr

ojec

ted

up d

ip).

Over

burd

en tn

owfl.

Drill

hole

; (pr

ojec

ted

vert/

celtf

, fro

ject

rt

up d

ip).

Ove

rto/rl

en t

/ww

n.

5/it/

I; de

pth

In fe

et.

Tntp

tt.

tiplw

iUo*

Innt

hlnC

-

Adit

Ouu

ry.

Grt

vtl p

it-

OPM

of,

f M

rv t U

W f

neto

*.

NiM

*^*

t- U

M.

7 lf

*

* *.

— ̂

* ^*

; H

umm

txky

(opo

p'"^

y.ik

Sw

imp

.

F-̂

Mot

or to

ad.

Oth

er t

oed.

-

.,

1r*i

l. po

rtmpe

. win

ter

/OK*

.

AN

D

MIN

ER

AL

A

BB

RE

VIA

TIO

NS

Au

go

ld

qc .

. . .

.qu

atz-

carb

on

ate

Aq

. . .

- .si

lver

tour

. . .

tourm

alin

e C

u. .

- . .

copper

al

. . .

. .alb

ite

Pb.

. . .

.le

ad

ep.

. . .

.ep

ido

te

Ni.

. . .

.nic

kel

fu.

. . .

.fuchsi

te

Zn.

. . .

.zi

nc

ank

. . .

.ankeri

te

Mo.

. . .

.m

olyb

denu

m

sid.

. ..s

ideri

te

mag.... m

agn

etit

e d

ol.

. . -

do

lom

ite

py .

. . .

.py

rite

se

rp.

. .se

rpen

tin

e

po .

. . .

.py

rrh

oti

te

mgs

t . .

.mag

nes

ite

cp.

. . .

.chalc

opyri

te

talc

. . .

talc

i

sp

sph

ale

rite

sh

ee.

. .sc

heeli

te

mo

. . .

. .m

oly

bd

enit

e eh

. . .

. .c

hlo

rite

ca

rb.

. .ca

rbonat

e as

b.

. . .

asbes

tos

q quar

tz

rous

. . .

.m

usc

ov

ite

LEG

EN

D

CLA

IM

PO

ST

10+0

0 N

5+00

N

4+

00

N

3+00

N

2+

00

N

00

N

BL

0+

00

1+00

S

2+00

S

3+00

S

4+

00 S

5+00

S

6+

00

S

7+00

S

42E12NW0152 2.11825 SANDRA

* 2

20

LJ

PO

PLA

R P

T.

10+0

0 N

9+00

N

8+00

N

7+00

N

6+00

N

5+00

N

4+

00 N

3+00

N

2+00

N

00 N

BL

0+

00

+00

S

9+

00

N

8+00

NJ2

a

HIGH

GRA

DE Z

OI&

1

1262

27

' 12

6228

62

29.X

*

53

12

6226

1262

2212

6223

^ - -~

T

I262

2;

1262

25

19

53*5^

*421^

•"

ita^

Y*

•i*^*

**

—ii

^.y

'

"T—

1262

1812

6219

1262

1212

6213

1262

14

7+

00 N

6+00

N

5+00

N

Stur

geon

2+00

S

3+00

S

4+

00 S

5+00

S

6+00

S

7+00

S

, Inc

linfd

, rt

rtktl).

METAL AND MINERAL ABBREVIATIONS

Lin

tmlio

n w

ji

Geo

hfka

t bo

-'nd*

ry, o

bttiv

ed.

Geo

hvic

e! b

ound

ary,

pos

ition

l/nca

mtn

f

FauH

; (o

bser

vtd,

tuu

med

). S

pot

Indi

ca

tes

dow

n (ft

fow

sid

e, t

now

s ho

rizon

tal m

wtfntn

t.

bat

foW

j wftf

t p/u

np*.

, syn

clin

e, tv

/lfj p

lung

e-

f^U .

* *

Ag.

. .

Cu.

. .

Pb..

.Ni

. .

.Zn

.. .

Mo.

-.ma

g .

.py

...

po..

.cp

. .

.sp

...

mo.

. .ca

rb.

q... -

j

. .s

ilver

. .c

opper

..le

ad. .n

ickel

. .z

inc

. .mo

lybd

enum

. .magnetite

. .p

yrite

. .py

rrho

tite

. .c

halcop

yrit

e. .

spha

leri

te. .

molybdenite

. .carbonate

. .qu

artz

tour

al..

ep..

fu..

ank.

sid.

dol.

serp

mgst

talc

shee

eh.

.as

b.mu

s .

. .qu

atz-

carb

onat

e. .tourmaline

..al

bite

..ep

idot

e..

fuch

site

..ankerite

..si

derite

..do

lomite

. .s

erpent

ine

..ma

gnesit

e. .talc

. .s

chee

lite

..ch

lorite

..as

bestos

..muscovite

LZ:

LEG

END

DC

LAIM

P

OS

T

"S l

o* l

JL o

Geo

logy

by

R.P.

Bow

en

REVI

SIO

NSHa

rotd

Ben

t

N E

NG

INE

ER

ING

IN

C

&EN

AUDE

N RE

SOUR

CES

LIMITE

D

GEOL

OGY

MAP

Dat

e:

Aug

. 88

Scal

e: l

: 500

0 A

onro

ved;

RPB

Dra

wn:

jib