30
A Self-Structuring 2-Port Network A. K. G. Temme* 1 C. H. (Jay) Lee 2 E. J. Rothwell 1 B. J. Greetis 1 R. O. Ouedraogo 1 S. Y. Chen 2 1 Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States 2 National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan 2009 APS/URSI Symposium Friday, June 5, 2009 Session 503.3 Ballroom C2, 8:40

A Self-Structuring 2-Port Network

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: A Self-Structuring 2-Port Network

A Self-Structuring 2-Port Network

A. K. G. Temme*1 C. H. (Jay) Lee2 E. J. Rothwell1

B. J. Greetis1 R. O. Ouedraogo1 S. Y. Chen2

1Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Michigan State University,East Lansing, MI, United States

2National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan

2009 APS/URSI SymposiumFriday, June 5, 2009

Session 503.3 Ballroom C2, 8:40

Page 2: A Self-Structuring 2-Port Network

Motivation Background Simulation Experiment Conc.

Overview1 Motivation2 Background3 Simulation Results4 Experimental Setup and Results

DesignRandom Search Results

5 ConclusionSummaryFuture WorkAcknowledgementsReferences

MSU Electromagnetics Research Group A Self-Structuring 2-Port Network 2/24

Page 3: A Self-Structuring 2-Port Network

Motivation Background Simulation Experiment Conc.

Project History

Project was started in 2007 by Jay Lee while visiting MichiganState University

Mr. Lee was responsible for simulations, design and initialconstruction of two port network

Currently supported by an IEEE AP-S UndergraduateResearch Award for 2008-2009

MSU Electromagnetics Research Group A Self-Structuring 2-Port Network 3/24

Page 4: A Self-Structuring 2-Port Network

Motivation Background Simulation Experiment Conc.

Motivation

Goal: To create a self structuring two port network

This two port network would be capable of adapting its structurein order to achieve a set of desired S-parameters

Figure: A basic two port network

MSU Electromagnetics Research Group A Self-Structuring 2-Port Network 4/24

Page 5: A Self-Structuring 2-Port Network

Motivation Background Simulation Experiment Conc.

Motivation

Goal: To create a self structuring two port network

This two port network would be capable of adapting its structurein order to achieve a set of desired S-parameters

Figure: Constructed Self-Structuring 2-Port Prototype

MSU Electromagnetics Research Group A Self-Structuring 2-Port Network 4/24

Page 6: A Self-Structuring 2-Port Network

Motivation Background Simulation Experiment Conc.

Motivation

Potential Uses

Filter

Attenuator

Phase Shifter

Matching network

Figure: Constructed Self-Structuring 2-Port Prototype

MSU Electromagnetics Research Group A Self-Structuring 2-Port Network 5/24

Page 7: A Self-Structuring 2-Port Network

Motivation Background Simulation Experiment Conc.

Self Structuring Antennae

Inspiration

The ideas of self structuring antennae served as stimuli for aself structuring two port network

Design modeled after a self structuring patch antenna[2] usingswitched pins and shorting pins

MSU Electromagnetics Research Group A Self-Structuring 2-Port Network 6/24

Page 8: A Self-Structuring 2-Port Network

Motivation Background Simulation Experiment Conc.

Self Structuring Antennae

Definition

An antenna array consisting of multiple elements connected byswitches allowing for the antenna to adjust its electrical shape inresponse to changes in its environment[1]

Figure: Possible self structuring antenna layout[1]

MSU Electromagnetics Research Group A Self-Structuring 2-Port Network 7/24

Page 9: A Self-Structuring 2-Port Network

Motivation Background Simulation Experiment Conc.

Self Structuring Antennae

MSU Electromagnetics Research Group A Self-Structuring 2-Port Network 8/24

Page 10: A Self-Structuring 2-Port Network

Motivation Background Simulation Experiment Conc.

Self Structuring Antennae

MSU Electromagnetics Research Group A Self-Structuring 2-Port Network 8/24

Page 11: A Self-Structuring 2-Port Network

Motivation Background Simulation Experiment Conc.

Simulations

In 2007 and 2008 Jay Lee studied design aspects including:

Board size and thickness

Pin placement

Feed method

Frequency tunability

Figure: Simulations of board design.Above 3D view. Right Plan viewshowing pin locations

MSU Electromagnetics Research Group A Self-Structuring 2-Port Network 9/24

Page 12: A Self-Structuring 2-Port Network

Motivation Background Simulation Experiment Conc.

Simulations

In 2007 and 2008 Jay Lee studied design aspects including:

Board size and thickness

Pin placement

Feed method

Frequency tunability

Simulations carried out in Feko

Genetic algorithm (GA) using GA-Feko

GA used to investigate filtering characteristics

MSU Electromagnetics Research Group A Self-Structuring 2-Port Network 9/24

Page 13: A Self-Structuring 2-Port Network

Motivation Background Simulation Experiment Conc.

GA Optimized Results

Figure: Band-pass optimized S-parameters centered at f0 ≈ 5.005GHzMSU Electromagnetics Research Group A Self-Structuring 2-Port Network 10/24

Page 14: A Self-Structuring 2-Port Network

Motivation Background Simulation Experiment Conc.

Frequency Tunability

Figure: Results from multiple optimization runs showing the frequencytunability of the 2 Port Network

MSU Electromagnetics Research Group A Self-Structuring 2-Port Network 11/24

Page 15: A Self-Structuring 2-Port Network

Motivation Background Simulation Experiment Conc. Design Random Search Results

Test Board Layout

Ribbon Cable

Port 1Port 2

Figure: 2-Port network manufacturing layout

Specifications

Taconic TLY-5double sided board

42x27x0.5(cm)

3cm grid spacing

32 Coto 5V reedrelay switchescontrolling pins

232 =4, 294, 967, 296possible states

38 Perimetershorting pins

MSU Electromagnetics Research Group A Self-Structuring 2-Port Network 12/24

Page 16: A Self-Structuring 2-Port Network

Motivation Background Simulation Experiment Conc. Design Random Search Results

Test Board Layout

Figure: Switchable pin pad layout

Specifications

Taconic TLY-5double sided board

42x27x0.5(cm)

3cm grid spacing

32 Coto 5V reedrelay switchescontrolling pins

232 =4, 294, 967, 296possible states

38 Perimetershorting pins

MSU Electromagnetics Research Group A Self-Structuring 2-Port Network 12/24

Page 17: A Self-Structuring 2-Port Network

Motivation Background Simulation Experiment Conc. Design Random Search Results

Test Board Layout

Figure 4.4. Photograph of one of the switches on the self-structuring patch antenna.

83

Figure: Mounted switch setup (image frompatch antenna[2])

Specifications

Taconic TLY-5double sided board

42x27x0.5(cm)

3cm grid spacing

32 Coto 5V reedrelay switchescontrolling pins

232 =4, 294, 967, 296possible states

38 Perimetershorting pins

MSU Electromagnetics Research Group A Self-Structuring 2-Port Network 12/24

Page 18: A Self-Structuring 2-Port Network

Motivation Background Simulation Experiment Conc. Design Random Search Results

Test Board Layout

Figure: Perimeter shorting pins locations

Specifications

Taconic TLY-5double sided board

42x27x0.5(cm)

3cm grid spacing

32 Coto 5V reedrelay switchescontrolling pins

232 =4, 294, 967, 296possible states

38 Perimetershorting pins

MSU Electromagnetics Research Group A Self-Structuring 2-Port Network 12/24

Page 19: A Self-Structuring 2-Port Network

Motivation Background Simulation Experiment Conc. Design Random Search Results

Constructed Test Board

Figure: Constructed test board

MSU Electromagnetics Research Group A Self-Structuring 2-Port Network 13/24

Page 20: A Self-Structuring 2-Port Network

Motivation Background Simulation Experiment Conc. Design Random Search Results

Experimental Run Configurations

Currently a random search, will move to genetic algorithm

100,000 random switch state pool (NIST generated)

LabView data acquisition and search software

HP 8753D Network Analyzer

MSU Electromagnetics Research Group A Self-Structuring 2-Port Network 14/24

Page 21: A Self-Structuring 2-Port Network

Motivation Background Simulation Experiment Conc. Design Random Search Results

Random Search

Parameters

Frequency Range 700MHz − 1.5GHzStates 30, 000 ≈ 0.0007% of possible states

Number of Points 26 ⇒ 32MHz stepsSwitch Settle Time 30ms

MSU Electromagnetics Research Group A Self-Structuring 2-Port Network 15/24

Page 22: A Self-Structuring 2-Port Network

Motivation Background Simulation Experiment Conc. Design Random Search Results

S21 Characteristics

MSU Electromagnetics Research Group A Self-Structuring 2-Port Network 16/24

Page 23: A Self-Structuring 2-Port Network

Motivation Background Simulation Experiment Conc. Design Random Search Results

S21 Characteristics

MSU Electromagnetics Research Group A Self-Structuring 2-Port Network 17/24

Page 24: A Self-Structuring 2-Port Network

Motivation Background Simulation Experiment Conc. Design Random Search Results

Matching Network

Parameters

Frequency Range 700MHz − 1.5GHzStates 100, 034 ≈ 0.0023% of possible statesa

Number of Points 26 ⇒ 32MHz stepsSwitch Settle Time 30ms

aAll switches open, all switches closed, each switch individually (32), and100,000 random states % of total

MSU Electromagnetics Research Group A Self-Structuring 2-Port Network 18/24

Page 25: A Self-Structuring 2-Port Network

Motivation Background Simulation Experiment Conc. Design Random Search Results

SWR - Matched (blue) and Unmatched (red)

MSU Electromagnetics Research Group A Self-Structuring 2-Port Network 19/24

Page 26: A Self-Structuring 2-Port Network

Motivation Background Simulation Experiment Conc. Design Random Search Results

SWR - Matched (blue) and Unmatched (red)

MSU Electromagnetics Research Group A Self-Structuring 2-Port Network 20/24

Page 27: A Self-Structuring 2-Port Network

Motivation Background Simulation Experiment Conc. Summary Future Work Acknowledgements References

Summary

Just beginning to investigate the Self-Structuring 2-PortNetworkCurrently using a random searchLess than 1% of possible states exploredSimulations and experimental results

Summary of Characteristics

Frequency tunability of characteristics in simulation|S21| is almost continuous from −10dB to −40dB∠S21 is almost continuous from −180◦ to +180◦

Resolution of desired characteristic value small; however, notfully investigatedSelf structuring attenuator, phase shifter, and matchingnetwork experimentally achievableMatching network can drastically improve antennaperformance

MSU Electromagnetics Research Group A Self-Structuring 2-Port Network 21/24

Page 28: A Self-Structuring 2-Port Network

Motivation Background Simulation Experiment Conc. Summary Future Work Acknowledgements References

Future Work

Implementation of Genetic Algorithm

Investigation of resolution

Filtering capabilities

Size reduction

MSU Electromagnetics Research Group A Self-Structuring 2-Port Network 22/24

Page 29: A Self-Structuring 2-Port Network

Motivation Background Simulation Experiment Conc. Summary Future Work Acknowledgements References

Acknowledgements

Thank you to Jack Ross for supplying GA-Feko

This research and presentation has been funded in part by:

Michigan State University Honors College Conference TravelAward

IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society UndergraduateResearch Award 2008-2009

Thank You for Attending

Any Questions?

MSU Electromagnetics Research Group A Self-Structuring 2-Port Network 23/24

Page 30: A Self-Structuring 2-Port Network

Motivation Background Simulation Experiment Conc. Summary Future Work Acknowledgements References

References

C.M. Coleman, E.J. Rothwell, J.E. Ross, and L.L. Nagy.Self-structuring antennas.Antennas and Propagation Magazine, IEEE, 44(3):11–23, Jun2002.

L.M. Greetis and E.J. Rothwell.A self-structuring patch antenna.Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium,2008. AP-S 2008. IEEE, pages 1–4, July 2008.

MSU Electromagnetics Research Group A Self-Structuring 2-Port Network 24/24