Upload
anneke
View
48
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
A simple model for superluminal motion and state transition of microquasars. Huazhong University of Science and technology. Gong Biping. Bulk motion. M. Rees 1966. Mirabel et al., 1994, Nature, 371, 46. XTE J1550-564 in 2000 and 2002. 2002, Science, 298, 196. GRS 1915+105 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
A simple model for superluminal motiA simple model for superluminal motion and state transition of microquasaon and state transition of microquasa
rsrs
Huazhong University of Science and technology
Gong Biping
Bulk motionBulk motion
M. Rees 1966
Mirabel et al., 1994, Nature, 371, 46.
XTE J1550-564XTE J1550-564 in 2000 and 2002 in 2000 and 2002
2002, Science, 298, 196.
2004, ARA&A, 42, 317.
GRS 1915+105
in 1994 and 1997
Miller-Jones et al 2005
Position angle Position angle variationvariation
1999, ApJ, 511, 398.
Difficult questions on SLMDifficult questions on SLM
(a) why the ratio of the displacement of the approaching blob to the receding blob is not a constant.
(b) why the receding jet appears later than the approaching jet in XTEJ1550-564 (for months) and GRS 1915+105 (for days).
(c) why deceleration appeared in XTE J1550-564 but not in GRS 1915+105.
(d) why the position angle changes 10 deg in 20-30 days in GRS 1915+105.
(e) why there is obvious oscillation in the receding blob.
(f) why 20% discrepancy in proper motion between the ejection of 1994 and 1997.
(g) why the size of condensations do not increase rapidly as expected from adiabatic expansion.
Other possibility?Other possibility?
Bulk motion
precession
The precession of GRS 1915+105 and SS433The precession of GRS 1915+105 and SS433
Jet precession model Jet precession model
Primary precessionPrimary precession
Perturbation to orbital elementsPerturbation to orbital elements
NutationNutation
SLM under precession scenarioSLM under precession scenario
(a) why the ratio of the displacement of the approaching blob to the (a) why the ratio of the displacement of the approaching blob to the receding blob is not a constant. receding blob is not a constant.
is not a constant under precession model
It is a constant under bulk motion
(b) why the receding jet appears later than the approaching jet in XTEJ1550-564 .
(c) why deceleration appeared in XTE J1550-564 but not in GRS 1915+105.
(d) why the decrease in flux density with angular separation from the core on GRS 1915+105 is remarkably similar with that of SS 433.
(e) why 20% discrepancy in proper motion between the ejection of 1994 and 1997.
(f) why the position angle changes 10 deg in 20-30 days in GRS 1915+105.
(g) why there is obvious oscillation in the receding blob.
Observations which are difficult to understand under the bulk motion scenario can be interpreted by the jet precession model naturally.
The state evolution of GRS 1915+105The state evolution of GRS 1915+105
Fender et al. 2004
Fender et al. 2004
Structured jet
Precession of the structured jetPrecession of the structured jet
SummarySummary
Simple
Unified
Easy to test
Thanks for your attention