19
A student needs analysis of the intranet Helen Court (OPTOM) Julia Kennedy (SOHCS) Rebecca Price-Davies (PHRMY) Katherine Shelton (PSYCH)

A student needs analysis of the intranet Helen Court (OPTOM) Julia Kennedy (SOHCS) Rebecca Price-Davies (PHRMY) Katherine Shelton (PSYCH)

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: A student needs analysis of the intranet Helen Court (OPTOM) Julia Kennedy (SOHCS) Rebecca Price-Davies (PHRMY) Katherine Shelton (PSYCH)

A student needs analysis of the intranet

Helen Court (OPTOM)Julia Kennedy (SOHCS)Rebecca Price-Davies (PHRMY)Katherine Shelton (PSYCH)

Page 2: A student needs analysis of the intranet Helen Court (OPTOM) Julia Kennedy (SOHCS) Rebecca Price-Davies (PHRMY) Katherine Shelton (PSYCH)

Aims of the Study

To increase understanding of students’ needs with regard to intranet usage (e.g. Blackboard) as an aid to learning

and

To adapt or implement change, if necessary, in order to maximise intranet usefulness for the students’ learning experience

Page 3: A student needs analysis of the intranet Helen Court (OPTOM) Julia Kennedy (SOHCS) Rebecca Price-Davies (PHRMY) Katherine Shelton (PSYCH)

Methodology

The general methodology was adapted to suit school and subject specification

Timing and delivery was adapted due to module teaching schedules

Page 4: A student needs analysis of the intranet Helen Court (OPTOM) Julia Kennedy (SOHCS) Rebecca Price-Davies (PHRMY) Katherine Shelton (PSYCH)

Methodology – phase 1

● A ‘pre-intervention questionnaire’ was emailed to all students registered on the identified module to investigate:

current usage of Blackboarddesired functions of Blackboard

Page 5: A student needs analysis of the intranet Helen Court (OPTOM) Julia Kennedy (SOHCS) Rebecca Price-Davies (PHRMY) Katherine Shelton (PSYCH)

Blackboard functions used by students

Page 6: A student needs analysis of the intranet Helen Court (OPTOM) Julia Kennedy (SOHCS) Rebecca Price-Davies (PHRMY) Katherine Shelton (PSYCH)

Blackboard functions deemed desirable by students

0

5

10

15

20

25

30In

tera

ctiv

ege

nera

l cla

ssfe

edbac

k

Pas

t pa

per

s

Em

ail

anno

unce

ment

rem

inde

rs

Lect

ure

mat

eria

l

Fur

ther

info

rmatio

n(r

eadi

ng li

sts,

web

site

s)

Lear

nin

gob

ject

ives

Mod

el a

nsw

ers

Sub

fol

ders

pe

rce

nta

ge

of r

esp

on

de

nts

Page 7: A student needs analysis of the intranet Helen Court (OPTOM) Julia Kennedy (SOHCS) Rebecca Price-Davies (PHRMY) Katherine Shelton (PSYCH)

Reason for selection of discussion boards

• applicable to and versatile for different modules

and

• allowed for

• increased feedback• contact with lecturer from remote sites• interactivity with peers

Page 8: A student needs analysis of the intranet Helen Court (OPTOM) Julia Kennedy (SOHCS) Rebecca Price-Davies (PHRMY) Katherine Shelton (PSYCH)

Discussion board implementation

The discussion boards were set-up for individual lecture series in the identified modules in all 4 schools

The discussion board was explained to the identified cohort of students identifying its use potential benefits

Page 9: A student needs analysis of the intranet Helen Court (OPTOM) Julia Kennedy (SOHCS) Rebecca Price-Davies (PHRMY) Katherine Shelton (PSYCH)

Discussion board implementation

‘Exam style’ discussion topics were posed following each lecture

SOHCS (4) OPTOM (10) PHRMY (4) PSYCH (3)

Researchers regularly visited the discussion board to make comments

Page 10: A student needs analysis of the intranet Helen Court (OPTOM) Julia Kennedy (SOHCS) Rebecca Price-Davies (PHRMY) Katherine Shelton (PSYCH)

Methodology – phase 2

● A ‘post-intervention questionnaire’ was issued to students to investigate:

● whether they had used the discussion board

● method of use – posted, viewed or both

its perceived benefits as a learning aid

Page 11: A student needs analysis of the intranet Helen Court (OPTOM) Julia Kennedy (SOHCS) Rebecca Price-Davies (PHRMY) Katherine Shelton (PSYCH)

‘How beneficial was the DB?’

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

SOHCS

PSYCH

PHRMY

OPTOM

1 (very)

2

3

4

5 (not at all)

Page 12: A student needs analysis of the intranet Helen Court (OPTOM) Julia Kennedy (SOHCS) Rebecca Price-Davies (PHRMY) Katherine Shelton (PSYCH)

Perceived benefits

OPTOM PHARM PSYCH SOHCS

Perceived benefits

Helps to check understanding/ consolidate/revise lecture and/or subject/topic

15 6 4 3

Helps structure/aid learning 2 1 1 0

Revision/seeing exam level questions 21 1 15 2

Lecturer feedback and contact 5 0 5 1

Allows comparison with other student ideas/answers

10 2 16 3

Encourages further research 1 2 0 0

Interactivity 0 2 1 0

Platform for discussion 0 1 0 0

Page 13: A student needs analysis of the intranet Helen Court (OPTOM) Julia Kennedy (SOHCS) Rebecca Price-Davies (PHRMY) Katherine Shelton (PSYCH)

DisadvantagesOPTOM PHARM PSYCH SOHCS

Disadvantages and barriers to use

More detailed responses from lecturer desirable

2 0 0 0

Too few posts or not enough activity 0 2 4 1

Too busy to use 1 3 4 2

Forgot to look 0 4 0 1

Would like model answers 1 1 0 0

Did not understand how to use 0 0 8 0

Social comparison (made more nervous when saw others work)

0 0 2 0

Limited to only 2 lectures of course 0 0 3 0

Didn’t suit style of learning 0 0 1 0

Page 14: A student needs analysis of the intranet Helen Court (OPTOM) Julia Kennedy (SOHCS) Rebecca Price-Davies (PHRMY) Katherine Shelton (PSYCH)

Discussion

• DB allows construction of knowledge contribution to discussion participation in the learning process

• helps to promote collaboration co-operation exploration construction of knowledge multiple perspectives problem solving negotiation

Page 15: A student needs analysis of the intranet Helen Court (OPTOM) Julia Kennedy (SOHCS) Rebecca Price-Davies (PHRMY) Katherine Shelton (PSYCH)

Discussion - Literature

• Active online interaction – posting messages predicts learning

• The number of visits (views) does not appear to be related to students perceived learning

• Rovai and Barnum (2003).

• Full participation appears central to the effectiveness

Page 16: A student needs analysis of the intranet Helen Court (OPTOM) Julia Kennedy (SOHCS) Rebecca Price-Davies (PHRMY) Katherine Shelton (PSYCH)

Limitations of the DB’s

Ran for only part of the semester

Were not embedded within the curriculum

Active participation was limited

Require assistance to enable students to take responsibility for their own learning

Page 17: A student needs analysis of the intranet Helen Court (OPTOM) Julia Kennedy (SOHCS) Rebecca Price-Davies (PHRMY) Katherine Shelton (PSYCH)

Potential use

• DB’s were greeted with enthusiasm Found to be of some benefit by most

respondents

Therefore

Scope to incorporate DB into undergraduate courses

Page 18: A student needs analysis of the intranet Helen Court (OPTOM) Julia Kennedy (SOHCS) Rebecca Price-Davies (PHRMY) Katherine Shelton (PSYCH)

So What?

• Requires embedding at a number of different levels: School Year group Within the course

• Must have some tangible benefit: National Student Survey Achievement of course aims

Page 19: A student needs analysis of the intranet Helen Court (OPTOM) Julia Kennedy (SOHCS) Rebecca Price-Davies (PHRMY) Katherine Shelton (PSYCH)

Thank you for listening!