Upload
roger-andrews
View
214
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
A study of language, theology and praxis from the UK and Ireland perspective
John Clark, Martin Lee, Philip Knights, Janice Price, Paul Rolph,
Anne Richards, Nigel Rooms
The Task
The task of this study group is to explore how a Trinitarian understanding of God as Father, Son and Holy Spirit relates to the theory and practice of mission; how the confession that God has a missionary identity impacts Christian witness; how a discernment of the Trinitarian God´s inner relationships and love impacts ecclesiology, community life and society.
Hypothesis
Academic and theological task Hypothesis is that what is said
publicly about the theology of mission by UK and Ireland churches, agencies and institutions does not necessarily match up with the mission practice, understanding and outworking of those same bodies.
Research in Three phases
Website search for public language about mission; NVIVO analysis of that language and semiotic analysis of sites
Survey using theological statements In depth interviews with participants
about their responses
National churches and agencies (GMN/GC/BIAMS)
Local churches in Nottinghamshire BIAMS conference members
Websites – NVIVO analysis ‘Transformation’ ‘Sharing’ ‘Equipping’ ‘Community’ ‘Fellowship’ ‘Supporting’ ‘Creation’ .
Some Website straplines
Sharing Jesus, Changing Lives Christian Care for Families A Community Centred on Christ for the New Evangelisation For People and Community Informing, promoting and inviting all Christians to respond to today’s mission Where a little goes a long way Growing leaders, growing churches
Websites Theological language not so important Pictures, stories, welcome, portal
devices send important messages More attention needed concerning
underlying meanings of images and web constituents
Some emphasis on the committed rather than the casual visitor
Can public language about mission be upheld in practice?
Survey
Statements about mission
Origin and Purpose of God’s Mission
Kingdom, Mission and Church
Who best does mission?
Evangelism and Mission
Mission and Development
Mission and Improving Lives
Mission and Other Faiths
God at work through….
Mission and Proclamation
Mission and Sin
Mission and Salvation (two statements)
Mission and Church (essence of the Church)
Mission and Church (function of the Church)
Mission and Partnership
Mission Outcomes
Mission Priorities page
Survey
Strongly agree Agree Neither agree nor disagree Disagree Strongly disagree
Challenging process but fruitful because the statements had to be addressed.
Survey results– emerging themes Desire to agree with ‘mission’; resist disagree ‘Good’ language (transformation, reconciliation,
hospitality, love) strongly affirmed Negative language (confront, condemn) resisted ‘Justice’ – deeply problematic Reflection on complex issues causes some shift Theology is weak driver The Church is missionary, but mission is not ‘to’
or ‘into’ church
Survey process- emerging themes Process helps people start to think about
the complexity and messiness of mission
Need to contextualise, root ideas in story
‘It depends what you mean…’ Is and ought Struggle to respond Leadership questions – does the team
think?
Interview process
Exploring: 13 Questions overall Experience of filling in the survey:
agreement and disagreement ‘Don’t know’ Problem of Justice
Authority, Trinity, Understanding of God Theological ‘position’: (Bevans and Schroeder)
Proclamation Missio Dei Justice
Comparison of theology and mission priorities
The Interviewees
Local 9 Anglicans, 2 Baptists, 1
each of Methodist, URC, Salvation Army, RC and Pentecostal.
13M 3F – 1 non-white British
Local Clergy in the main with some with denominational roles.
National 11 in total – 3 Churches, 8
Mission Agencies 4 Mission agencies in
Global Connections Network
Rest from GMN network Some issues with
interviewee not being the survey respondent
In-depth interviews –local headlines Clergy universally convinced of the
local missionary task as core purpose of the church
Some evidence of receptivity of Missio Dei, but only some – an “adoption distribution curve”?
Many want to hold to a holistic approach while a majority when pressed will prioritise proclamation of Christ
In-depth interviews: national headlines
Leadership tensions & representation: difference between churches and agencies
Awareness of Missio Dei (esp. agencies) but not foremost driver
Desire to root things in theological reflections and story
‘justice’ as problematic word ‘holistic’ emerges again
Further Analysis –mission drivers Wide range of understandings
of mission Congregations lag behind Authority for mission – Mt.
28:19-20 Institution as a drag as well as
driver
Further Analysis: Justice
In local churches not much enthusiasm part of the whole Justice as simple charity In national interviews Justice as a means
to an end ‘’holistic’ – a “get out jail free” card?
Further Analysis: God of Mission
In Local Churches one third very clear only two give a fully Trinitarian answer one third thrown by the question –
silenced for some time and then talk about mission in general
spirituality of mission is missing here Nationally little evidence of spirituality in
mission
Conclusions
Public mission language does not match mission reality
Websites have hidden potential that is probably not realised
‘Mission’ has common assent but prioritising action in mission is difficult
Most response to relational language and themes
Resistance to negative, separating language Theology is a weak driver, mostly Matthew 28.19 ‘Justice’ is a problem Need to contextualise what mission is in
experience Gap between leadership and ordinary Christians
Outcomes
Process just as important as results and felt to be useful so production of:
Tool for web analysis and thinking about design for mission messages
Adaptations of the survey for different constituencies to do mission audit
Template of questions for discussion or interview for mission reflection