Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Ref. code: 25595821040606JOBRef. code: 25595821040606JOB
A SURVEY OF THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE
COMMUNICATION NEEDS OF QUEEN SIRIKIT
MUSEUM OF TEXTILES OFFICIALS
BY
MISS NUCHADA PIANPRASANKIT
AN INDEPENDENT STUDY PAPER SUBMITTED IN
PARTIALFULFILLMENT OF
THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF
MASTER OF ARTS IN CAREER ENGLISH FOR
INTERNATIONAL COMMUNICATION
LANGUAGE INSTITUTE, THAMMASAT UNIVERSITY
ACADEMIC YEAR 2016
COPYRIGHT OF THAMMASAT UNIVERSITY
Ref. code: 25595821040606JOBRef. code: 25595821040606JOB
A SURVEY OF THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE
COMMUNICATION NEEDS OF QUEEN SIRIKIT
MUSEUM OF TEXTILES OFFICIALS
BY
MISS NUCHADA PIANPRASANKIT
AN INDEPENDENT STUDYPAPER SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL
FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE
OF MASTER OF ARTS IN CAREER ENGLISH FOR
INTERNATIONAL COMMUNICATION
LANGUAGE INSTITUTE, THAMMASAT UNIVERSITY
ACADEMIC YEAR 2016
COPYRIGHT OF THAMMASAT UNIVERSITY
Ref. code: 25595821040606JOBRef. code: 25595821040606JOB
(1)
Independent Study Paper Title A SURVEY OF THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE
COMMUNICATION NEEDS OF QUEEN
SIRIKIT MUSEUM OF TEXTILESOFFICIALS
Author Miss Nuchada Pianprasankit
Degree Master of Arts
Major Field/Faculty/University Career English for International Communication
Language Institute
Thammasat University
Independent Study Paper Advisor Pimsiri Taylor, Ed.D.
Academic Years 2016
ABSTRACT
This study investigated the English language communication needs as
well as the implications and suggestions for an English language training course of
Queen Sirikit Museum of Textiles officials. In terms of English language
communication needs, the study focused on the four areas of listening, speaking,
reading, and writing. The study was conducted using forty-four copies of
questionnaires distributed to respondents from four different departments: Museum
Department, Operation Department, Administration Department, and Visitor Services
Department. The data was analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social
Sciences (SPSS).The results revealed that the majority of respondents need to
improve their writing skills, especially writing formal letters. The implications for
English training courses are that the organization needs to provide the officials with
an English training course to support their tasks and job positions. In order to design a
training course, the organization has to determine the objective and subjective training
needs.
Keywords: Needs analysis, English language, Museum
Ref. code: 25595821040606JOBRef. code: 25595821040606JOB
(2)
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This research study could not have been accomplished without the help and
support of many people.
Firstly, I would like to express my gratitude to my advisor, Dr. Pimsiri Taylor,
for her kindness, encouragement, and valuable advice throughout my research study.
Secondly, I would like to thank my colleagues who always gave me great
ideas for this research study and also the staff of the Queen Sirikit Museum of
Textiles for responding to my questionnaires.
Lastly, I would like to thank my friends who always asked about the progress
of my study. Moreover, I thank my family for their great support and love. They were
the great motivation for me to complete my masterâs degree
Miss Nuchada Pianprasankit
Ref. code: 25595821040606JOBRef. code: 25595821040606JOB
(3)
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
ABSTRACT (1)
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS (2)
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Background 5
1.2 Research questions 7
1.3 Objectives of the study 8
1.4 Definitions of Terms 8
1.5 Scope of the study 8
1.6 Significance of the study 8
1.7 Organization of the study 9
CHAPTER 2 REVIEW OF LITERATURE 10
2.1 The needs of English language for communication 10
2.2 The needs as a tool to develop the organization 10
2.3 Identifying the needs of English language communication 11
2.4 Relevant research 12
CHAPTER 3 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 15
3.1 Respondents 15
3.2 Research instrument 15
3.3 Procedures 16
Ref. code: 25595821040606JOBRef. code: 25595821040606JOB
(4)
CHAPTER 4 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 18
4.1 General information 18
4.2 The needs of using English language communication 22
4.3 The suggestions for English language training courses 25
CHAPTER 5 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 29
5.1 Summary of the findings 29
5.2 Conclusion 30
5.3 Recommendations for further research 30
REFERENCES 31
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A 34
APPENDIX B 39
BIOGRAPHY 44
Ref. code: 25595821040606JOBRef. code: 25595821040606JOB
1
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background
The English language has been used for communication as an
international language in Thailand. The English language is also commonly used in
Thailandâs tourism industry (Rattanaphumma, 2013). According to the statistics of the
National Statistical Office of Thailand (2017), there was significant growth of tourists
in Thailand between 2002-2015. Hence, the tourism industry also requires a large
number of employees who have good English language proficiency (Piriyasilpa,
2014).
Museums are considered to be an important part of the tourism industry,
reflecting tangible and intangible identity of a local culture and serving as educational
centers for the general public (Murphy, 2004). Museums tend to be interesting tourist
attractions, which is why the number of museums in Thailand grew significantly
between 1999 and 2015. Among those are local museums, university museums,
private museums, public museums, etc. (Thai Museums Database, 2017).Queen
Sirikit Museum of Textiles is located at The Grand Palace in Bangkok, which is one
of the most interesting tourist attractions in Thailandâs capital. Queen Sirikit Museum
of Textiles was officially opened on May 9, 2012. The museum has approximately
1,000-1,500 visitors per day and 80% of visitors are foreign visitors. The museum
also provides an alternative leaning method by having bi-lingual exhibition
descriptions (Thai and English) in the galleries and activity room. In order to serve as
an educational textiles center in Southeast Asia following the museumâs mission, the
organization plans to provide a human resource development program for officials
such as organizational training and technical skills training. Thus, the museum aims to
provide English Language training courses, which would be properly supported and
tailored to every role in the museum.
Queen Sirikit Museum of Textiles consists of four departments:
(1.) Museum department, (2.)Operation department, (3.)Administration department,
(4.) Visitor services department.
Ref. code: 25595821040606JOBRef. code: 25595821040606JOB
2
The Museum department is a crucial department which reflects the
organization. The Museum departmentâs official work has different roles: Curators
have to manage the museumâs collection and design exhibitions; education and
activities program officials have to generate and transmit the knowledge related to
exhibitions to the public; conservators and registrars are responsible for preserving,
conserving, and cataloging the museumâs objects. In addition, the museumâs
departments have to carry out and publish academic research in order to maintain its
position as a center of academic study. Not only are reading and writing skills
considered crucial for this department, but listening and speaking skills are equally
important, especially when attending international conferences or presenting
academic papers.
The Operation department supports other departments by providing
several services. For example, graphic designers have to design and produce the
products related to current exhibitions. Information technology has to provide and
support the internet system for officials, whereas engineers have to manage and
control the museumâs environment in order to preserve the artifacts (HVAC system,
i.e. Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning, Lighting system, Fire protection
system etc.).
The Administration department supports and assists other departments.
For example, HR officials are responsible for activities relating to officials e.g.
recruiting, issuing certificates of employment, organizing training programs, etc.
Accounting and purchasing officials have to contact and communicate with other
organizations.
The official at Visitor Services have to provide good services and
products for visitors. For example, the visitor service officers have to welcome and
give information about the museum and exhibitions to visitors. Finally, the staff
employed at the museum shop have to be able to explain products and persuade
customers to make purchases.
Ref. code: 25595821040606JOBRef. code: 25595821040606JOB
3
As mentioned above, English language communication skills are essential
for Queen Sirikit Museum of Textilesâ officials in order to achieve their career goals
and organizational mission. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the needs of
English language communication skills: Listening, Speaking, Reading, and Writing.
The results of this study will be used for English language training courses for the
museumâs officials in the future.
1.2 Research questions
There are two research questions as follows:
1.2.1 What are the most needed English communication skills that Queen
Sirikit Museum of Textiles officials require to improve?
1.2.2 What are the implications or suggestions regarding training needs in
English language communication for Queen Sirikit Museum of Textiles officials?
Ref. code: 25595821040606JOBRef. code: 25595821040606JOB
4
1.3 Objectives of the study
The study objectives are:
1.3.1To investigate the needs of English language communication
skills of Queen Sirikit Museum of Textiles officials
1.3.2To give suggestions on the training needs of English language
communication skills.
1.4 Definitions of terms
Definitions of terms in this study are:
QSMT refer to Queen Sirikit Museum of Textiles, Thailand
QSMT officials refer to persons who work in Queen Sirikit Museum of
Textiles
Needs refer to the requirements of English language communication
skills, which cover four areas: Listening, Speaking, Reading, and Writing.
English communication skills refer to the performance in English
listening, speaking, reading, and writing.
1.5 Scope of the study
Forty-four officials of the Queen Sirikit Museum of Textiles who use
English language through their communication were used as respondents of this
study. Forty-four copies of the questionnaires were distributed. One hundred percent
of completed questionnaires were returned to analyze. The duration of collecting data
was one week.
1.6 Significance of the study
This study will firstly aid the researcher in understanding the needs of
English language communication skills of Queen Sirikit Museum of Textiles officials.
Ref. code: 25595821040606JOBRef. code: 25595821040606JOB
5
Secondly, the study will help the organization to develop English language
proficiency of the officials.
1.7 Organization of the study
This research study comprises three chapters.
Chapter One: Introduction consists of background, research questions,
objectives of the study, definitions of terms, scope of the study, significance of the
study, and organization of the study.
Chapter Two: Review of the literature covers four topics; the needs of
English language for communication, the needs as a tool to develop the organization,
identifying the needs of English language communication and relevant research.
Chapter Three: Methodology contains the respondents, the research
instruments, the procedures.
Chapter Four: Results of the study contains three parts; General
information, the needs of using English language communication, and the suggestions
for English language training courses.
Chapter Five: Conclusion and Recommendations. This chapter consists of
three topics: the summary of the findings, conclusion, and the recommendations for
further research.
Ref. code: 25595821040606JOBRef. code: 25595821040606JOB
6
CHAPTER 2
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
The review of literature in this study focuses on (1.) The needs of English
Language communication, (2.)Needs as a tool to develop the organization,
(3.)Identifying the needs of English language communication, (4.)Relevant research.
2.1 The needs of English language for communication
The definition of need can be explained by Oxford dictionary as
circumstances or things that are required because of the necessity rather than desire.
The demand of using English language for Specific Purposes (ESP), such as English
for Academic Purposes (EAP) and English for Occupational Purposes (EOP) is
caused by the demand of the âbrave new worldâ. Because the significance of English
language is related to the international currencies of technology and commerce, this
creates a great number of new learners who have a distinctive objective of learning
English. For example, businesspersons need to be able to sell the products
internationally, mechanics need to be able to read English instruction manuals,
doctors need to further their expertise, etc. (Hutchinson and Waters, 2010). As a
result, there has been a growing importance of English for Specific Purposes (ESP),
which focuses on learnersâ needs and interests with intensively specific and limited
objectives (Basturkmen, 2010). Therefore, English for Specific Purposes programs
create learnerâs motivation, which has a significant impact on the needs of English
language. The results can be seen in the study of Kasper (1997) and Song (2006).
2.2 Needs as a tool to develop the organization
Needs theory has been used to develop organizations for a long time.
Needs can be defined as the gap between current results and desired results and
consequences (Kaufman, 2000; McConnell, 2003). Needs assessment or needs
analysis is an instrument that is generally used to identify the needs of employees in
an organization.
Ref. code: 25595821040606JOBRef. code: 25595821040606JOB
7
Deborah D Tobey (2005) suggests that in order to construct a sustainable
organizational training program, the organizational training structure should be related
to the organizational objectives. Therefore, the organization has to provide training
courses that focus on the officials, the target audience. Moreover, Sheal (1994) notes
that time, capital and resources of organization affect needs analysis.
Training needs can be divided into two aspects: (1.) The organizational
training needs (2.) The individual training needs. The organizational training needs
have to be related to the requirements of organizational objectives. Hence,
organizations have to provide the training for officials, especially courses which relate
to the nature of their work. For example, the customer service department has to deal
directly with customers such as welcoming customers, giving information about
organization, etc. To this end, the organization, therefore, might have to provide a
speaking and listening course for the customer service department. Individual training
needs refer to the requirements of an individual employee, rather than typical
employees. The objective of individual training needs is to improve specific
employeeâs skills. For example, an accountant needs to be trained in a basic
mathematics course. Although every employee might have such individual needs, the
organization has to determine what training programs to introduce to benefit all
employees (McConnell, 2003).
2.3 Identifying the needs of English language communication
Needs analysis is used as a tool to assess the English language needs of
learners. Dudley-Evans and St.John(2011) provide a definition of needs analysis as
the process of establishing a course such as English for Specific Purposes (ESP).
Hutchinson and Waters (2010) suggest the target needs analysis should be
considered in order to approach English language needs. Target needs refer to what
the learner needs to do in the target situation. Target needs can be considered in three
aspects:
2.3.1 Necessities: what the learner has to know in order to function
effectively in the target situation. For example, a businessperson might need to
understand business letters, or to communicate effectively at sales conferences.
Ref. code: 25595821040606JOBRef. code: 25595821040606JOB
8
2.3.2 Lacks: the absence of learnerâs necessities. Therefore, necessities of
each target situation need to be addressed first. Then, the lacks can be identified
afterward.
2.3.3 Wants: the requirement of learners. Wants is differ from lacks and
necessities since wants focus on the perspective of learners rather than perspective of
instructors, which is shown in necessities and lacks.
2.4 Relevant research
In this section, the literature involves empirical studies, which are
connected with needs analysis of English communication skills required in the
workplace as this research project is in the service industry.
Soda(2014) conducted an analysis of staffsâ needs and problems in
English communication at an international company. There were three purposes of
this study. First, to investigate the needs in English communication of respondents.
Second, to explore the problems in English communication of the respondents. And
last, to examine the type of English course that respondents prefer to attend. Thirty-
six questionnaires were used to explore the three research questions. The results were
transcribed into the descriptive statistics of percentage, mean score, and standard
deviation. The results revealed that the speaking skill was the most needed skill for
communication. The writing skill was defined as the most problematic
communication skill. The respondents also preferred listening and speaking training
courses delivered by native English speakers.
Khakhai (2014) investigated the needs of the English langue of Thai
therapist on Khaosarn Road and explored the problems of using English language
communication. The study used 51 respondents who were Thai massage therapists.
The researcher combined qualitative and quantitative data in the study. Firstly, the
researcher observed the respondentsâ workplace and workingâs process. Secondly, a
questionnaire was constructed from observed information. After that, the
questionnaires were used to interview respondents. The results showed that the
respondents want to be trained in English training course, especially listening and
speaking courses. The most problematic skill of respondents was writing skill.
Ref. code: 25595821040606JOBRef. code: 25595821040606JOB
9
Moreover, vocabulary, cultural learning, pronunciation and spelling were shown as
the additional needed topics to be trained.
Suparan (2014) investigated the needs and problems in using English
among hotel receptionists in Karnchanaburi Province, Thailand. The researcher used a
questionnaire as an instrument. The questionnaire covered four communication skills:
listening, speaking, reading, and writing. A total of 80 hotel receptionists were used as
respondents in this study. The results revealed that listening and speaking skillswere
the most needed, whereas writing and reading skills were indicated as the most
problematic ones.
Pongjumpa (2011) explored the needs of English proficiency of staff of a
five-star hotel in Bangkok in relation to the needs for hotel-related English and
general English. This study aimed to investigate the needs in English language of the
hotel staff. Two hundred questionnaires were used as the instrument to rate the level
of need in four communication skills: listening, speaking,reading and writing. The
data was analyzed and presented in the percentage, mean score, and standard
deviation. The results revealed that speaking and listening skills were the most needed
communication skills for work.
Charunsri (2011) explored the needs and problems of English language
skills for the hotel front office staff in Chinatown, Bangkok. The study aimed to
define the needs and problems in listening, speaking, reading and writing, as well as
in grammar and vocabulary. The respondents were 60 members of front office staff.
This study used a five-point Likert scale and open-ended questionnaires for sixty
respondents. The results indicated that most of the respondents rated speaking skill as
the most needed and problematic skill.
Khamkaew(2009) conducted an analysis of the needs and problems in
English Listening and Speaking Skills using thirty Metropolitan Police Officers at
Counter Service at Chana Songkram Police Station as a case study. A questionnaire
with a five-point Likert scale and open-ended questions was used as the instrument to
identify the needs of respondents. This study revealed the major problem of
respondents was listening skill in order to be able to understand and interpret the main
idea of a conversation. The study also shows that the respondents need to improve
listening and speaking skills, particularly in general English conversation.
Ref. code: 25595821040606JOBRef. code: 25595821040606JOB
10
Tanviboolaya (2014) investigated the problems and needs in the business
English writing skills of employees at Electronics Source Co, LTD. The study used
fifty of the companyâs employees in different departments as respondents. The
researcher used questionnaires as a research instrument. The data were analyzed using
the SPSS program and presented in terms of percentage, frequency, mean, and
standard deviation. The results showed that writing skill was the most problematic for
respondents, especially grammar, sentence structure and business writing
presentation. Most of respondents preferred to attend an English writing course
provided by organization.
Ref. code: 25595821040606JOBRef. code: 25595821040606JOB
11
CHAPTER 3
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
There are three parts of this chapter: (1.) the respondents, (2.) the research
instrument, (3.) the procedures used in data collection and analysis.
3.1 Respondents
The respondents of this study were forty-four officials of Queen Sirikit
Museum of Textiles who have to use English language communication as part of their
work. The officials worked in four different departments: Museum Department (12),
Operation Department (9), Administration Department (5), and Visitor Service
Department (18).
3.2 Research instrument
Interviews and questionnaires were used as the research instrument of this
study.
The interviews were conducted during April20-22,2017. The persons
interviewed were the Deputy Director of Operation and Support, a Human Resource
officer, and QSMT officials. The purpose of the interviews was to collect additional
information regarding organizational objectives and working activities. The
information from interviews was used to develop the questionnaire.
Questionnaires were used to investigate the needs for the development of
the English language communication skills. The questionnaire was adapted from a
survey study of staffâs needs and problems in English communication at an
international company by Soda(2014).Because all of the respondents of this study
were Thai, the questionnaires were translated into the Thai language in order to be
understandable for the respondents (Dudley-Evans and St.John,2010).The
questionnaire consisted of three parts:
Part 1: General information. There were seven questions in this part:
gender, age, educational background, job position and department, duration of
Ref. code: 25595821040606JOBRef. code: 25595821040606JOB
12
studying the English language in a formal educational setting, necessity of English
language, and frequency of using English language communication.
Part 2: The needs of using English language communication. This part
was divided into four areas: Listening, Speaking, Reading, and Writing. The
respondents had to identify their needs in English communication skills by using a
five-point Likert scale.
Part 3: The suggestions for English language training course. This part
provided respondents an opportunity to give their suggestions for an English language
training course.
3.3 Procedures
3.3.1 Data collection
First, a request letter was sent directly to the Director of Queen Sirikit
Museum of Textiles for permission to collect research data from the officials. After
the researcher was allowed to collect data, interviews were conducted with the Deputy
Director, HR officers and other officials to construct the questionnaire. Later, the
developed questionnaire was sent for approval by the Deputy Director before being
distributed. This process took one week. Then, forty-four copies of questionnaires
were distributed to officials during 25-28 April, 2017.The completed questionnaires
were returned directly to the researcher. Afterward, the data was checked and
analyzed by the researcher.
3.3.2 Data analysis
The data obtained from the completed questionnaires was analyzed using
the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS). The results were divided into
three parts:
The first part about the general information of respondents was shown
using percentage and frequency.
The second part on the needs of English language communication skills
was analyzed and presented as mean scores, standard deviation, and interpretation of
need levels as follows:
Ref. code: 25595821040606JOBRef. code: 25595821040606JOB
13
Ratings of
Opinions
Interpretation of the Scale Mean Range Level of Needs
5 Strongly Agree 4.21-5.00 Very Low
4 Agree 3.41-4.20 Low
3 Neither Agree Nor Disagree 2.61-3.40 Moderate
2 Disagree 1.81-2.60 High
1 Strongly Disagree 1.00-1.80 Very High
The third part was about the suggestions for an English language training
course. The frequency, percentage and qualitative data from open-ended questions
were used to present it.
Ref. code: 25595821040606JOBRef. code: 25595821040606JOB
14
CHAPTER 4
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
This chapter reveals the results of this study. The data was collected using
the questionnaires completed by forty-four officials of Queen Sirikit Museum of
Textiles. The forty-four questionnaires were distributed to the respondents during 25-
28 April 2017. One hundred percent of completed questionnaires were returned
directly to the researcher. Later, the data was used to obtain the results, which were
divided into three parts:
Part 1: General Information
Part 2: The needs of using English language for communication
Part 3: The suggestions for English language training courses
4.1 General information
This part covers seven topics: gender, age, education, job position and
department, period of studying English, necessity of English for job position, and
frequency of using English through the work. The report will be explained by
showing frequency and percentage.
Table 4.1.1 Gender of respondents
Table 4.1.1 shows that the majority of respondents were females (68.2%)
and 31.8% of respondents were males.
Gender Frequency Percentage
Male 14 31.8
Female 30 68.2
Total 44 100
Ref. code: 25595821040606JOBRef. code: 25595821040606JOB
15
Table 4.1.2 Age of respondents
Age Frequency Percentage
20-30 17 38.6
31-40 23 52.3
41-50 2 4.5
51-60 2 4.5
Total 44 100
It is shown in Table 4.1.2 that the age of respondents was from 20-60
years old. The respondents aged between 31-40 years old were the representative of
the largest group (52.3%).The second group of respondents aged between 20-30 years
old represented a share of 38.6%. The last two groups of respondents, 41-50 years old
and 51-60 years old, were at the same percentage, each sharing 4.5% of the total.
Table4.1.3 Education of respondents
Education Frequency Percentage
Lower than Bachelorâs degree 7 15.9
Bachelorâs degree 33 75
Higher than Bachelorâs degree 4 3.1
Total 44 100
Most of the respondents as shown in Table 4.1.3 had a bachelorâs degree
(75%), while 15.9% of respondents had below a bachelorâs degree. Respondents with
a masterâs degree or higher represented 3.1% of the total.
Table 4.1.4 Department of Respondents
Department Frequency Percentage
Museum Department 12 27.3
Operation Department 9 20.5
Administration Department 5 11.4
Visitor Services Department 18 40.9
Total 44 100
Ref. code: 25595821040606JOBRef. code: 25595821040606JOB
16
Table 4.1.4 shows that40.9% of respondents worked at Visitor Services
Department. There were 27.3% who served in the Museum Department, while20.5%
and 11.4% represented the Operation Department and Administration Department,
respectively.
Table 4.1.5 Period of Studying English
Period of Studying English Frequency Percentage
Less than 5 years 6 13.6
5 years 3 6.8
10 years 13 29.5
More than 10 years 22 50
Total 44 100
It is shown in Table 4.1.5 that half of the respondents had been studying
English in a formal setting for more than 10 years. There were 29.5% respondents
who had been studying English for 10 years. Meanwhile, 13.6% and 6.8% of
respondents had been studying English for less than 5 years and 5 years, respectively.
Table 4.1.6 The necessity of English for job position
Table 4.1.6 indicates that majority of respondents considered the English
language necessary for their role, while only 2.3% did not find English necessary
The necessity of English Frequency Percentage
Yes 43 97.7
No 1 2.3
Total 44 100
Ref. code: 25595821040606JOBRef. code: 25595821040606JOB
17
Table 4.1.7 The frequency of using English at work
Duration
More than
5 days per
week
3-5 days
per week
Less than 3
days per
week
Total
En
gli
sh C
om
mu
nic
ati
on
Sk
ills
Listening
Frequency 15
8 21 44
Percentage 34.1
18.2 47.7 100
Speaking
Frequency 15
7 22 44
Percentage 34.1
15.9 50 100
Reading
Frequency 14
14 16 44
Percentage 31.8
31.8 36.4 100
Writing
Frequency 4
13 27 44
Percentage 9.1
29.5 61.4 100
According to Table4.1.7, most of the respondents reported using listening
skill in their work less than three days per week (47.7%), while34.1%, of respondents
used listening skill more than five days per week. A total of18.2% of the surveyed
staff used listening skill three to five days per week.
With regard to the speaking skill, 50% of respondents spoke English in
their work less than three days per week, while34.1% of respondents used spoken
English more than five days per week; at the same time, 15.9% of those surveyed had
opportunities to speak English three to five days per week.
Focusing on reading skill, 36.4% of respondents admitted using reading
skill less than three days per week , whereas equal numbers of respondents (31.8%)
Ref. code: 25595821040606JOBRef. code: 25595821040606JOB
18
reported using reading skill more than five days per week and three to five days per
week.
Regarding writing skill, the majority of respondents indicated using
writing skill less than three days per week. The second rank of respondents used
English language three to five days per week (29.5%). The last rank of respondents
were the people using writing skill more than five days per week (9.1%).
4.2 The needs of using English language communication
This part consists of four areas: The needs of using listening skill in
different activities, needs of using speaking skill in different activities, needs of using
reading skill in different activities, and needs of using writing skill in different
activities. The questionnaires were interpreted using mean scores and standard
deviations. The results were ranked using mean scores. The rates of respondentsâ
opinions were analyzed into the mean range. Then, the mean range was interpreted to
the level of needs. The interpretation is shown as follows:
Ratings of Opinions Interpretation of the Scale Mean Range Level of Need
5 Strongly Agree 4.21-5.00 Very Low
4 Agree 3.41-4.20 Low
3 Neither Agree Nor
Disagree
2.61-3.40 Moderate
2 Disagree 1.81-2.60 High
1 Strongly Disagree 1.00-1.80 Very High
The target needs analysis (Hutchinson and Waters, 2010), especially with
regard to lacks showing the ability that is in need of improvement, was used in the
explanation. This part also includes the comparison of average mean scores of the
four communication skills.
Ref. code: 25595821040606JOBRef. code: 25595821040606JOB
19
Table 4.2.1 The need of using listening skill in different activities
Activities Mean SD Level of Need
Understanding foreign
customers/staff enquiries
3.36 0.857 Low
Understanding actual
conversations
3.32 0.942 Moderate
Understanding when foreign
customers/staff speak in different
accents
2.98 0.876 Moderate
Understanding English lectures
and presentations
2.80 0.954 Moderate
Average mean score 3.1136 Moderate
As can be seen in Table 4.2.1, understanding English lectures and
presentations had the lowest mean score (2.80).Therefore, listening to lectures and
presentations activity is the most needed activity of QSMT officials regarding
listening skill. On the other hand, listening to what customers/staff enquire activity
was rated as the least needed listening activity (mean score 3.36).
Table 4.2.2 The need of using speaking skill in different activities
Activities Mean SD Level of Need
Giving greetings and daily
communication
3.57 0.818 Low
Making polite requests 3.41 0.844 Low
Giving the introduction and
description of work
3.32 0.857 Moderate
Giving bad news or refusals 2.93 0.789 Moderate
Average mean score 3.31 Moderate
Based on the data from Table 4.2.2, the respondents indicated giving bad
news or refusals as the most needed speaking activity (mean score 2.93), while
greetings and daily communication is shown as the least needed speaking activity.
Ref. code: 25595821040606JOBRef. code: 25595821040606JOB
20
Table 4.2.3 The need of using reading skill in different activities
Activities Mean SD Level of Need
Reading museumâs signs and
exhibitionâs descriptions
3.39 0.868 Moderate
Reading English emails 3.20 1.112 Moderate
Reading work-related texts,
journals or articles
3.20 1.002 Moderate
Reading contracts or agreements 2.95 0.963 Moderate
Average mean score 3.19 Moderate
As demonstrated in Table 4.2.3, the respondentsâ opinions indicated
reading contracts or agreements activity is the most needed reading activity. On the
other hand, the least needed speaking activity is reading museumâs signs and
exhibitionâs descriptions (mean score3.39).
Table 4.2.4 The need of using writing skill in different activities
Activities Mean SD Level of Need
Writing resumes or curriculum
vitae
3.14 0.930 Moderate
Filling in forms, e.g. registration
forms, booking confirmations
3.11 0.945 Moderate
Writing email correspondence 2.89 1.125 Moderate
Writing formal letters 2.41 0.948 High
Average mean score 2.8864 Moderate
As shown in Table 4.2.4, the most needed activity is writing formal
letters(mean score 2.41), whereas writing resumes or curriculum vitae was rated as the
least needed writing activity (mean score 3.14).
Ref. code: 25595821040606JOBRef. code: 25595821040606JOB
21
Table 4.2.5 The comparison of average mean scores
Skill Average mean score Level of Need
Writing 2.89 Moderate
Listening 3.11 Moderate
Reading 3.19 Moderate
Speaking 3.31 Moderate
The mean scores presented in Table 4.2.5indicate that writing skill was
the most needed skill (2.89) of QSMT officials. This finding relates to Soda(2014)
and Tanviboolaya(2014), who found that writing skill was the most problematic skill
of officials who worked in international organizations. Conversely, the skill that
QSMT officials believed was in the least in need of improvement was speaking, rated
at3.31.
4.3 The suggestions for English language training courses
There were seven topics covered in this part: expressed need for English
language training course, desirable course, number of classes per week, length of
class, period of classes, instructor, and suggestions of activities/topics of English
training course. This results of this part are shown as frequency and percentage.
Additionally, the wants of target needs analysis is used in the discussion in this part.
Table 4.3.1 The expressed need for English language training course
Frequency Percentage
Yes 38 86.4
No 6 13.6
Total 44 100
Table 4.3.1 shows that 86.4% of respondents want to participate in an
English language training course, whereas the other 13.6% of respondents do not want
to participate in a course.
Ref. code: 25595821040606JOBRef. code: 25595821040606JOB
22
Table 4.3.2 The desirable course
Skill Frequency Percentage
Listening 9 20.5
Speaking 18 40.9
Reading 1 2.3
Writing 10 22.7
Missing 6 13.6
Total 44 100
According to target needs analysis (Hutchinson and Waters, 2010), wants
refers to desire or requirement of respondents. Therefore, a speaking course was
indicated by QSMT officials as the most wanted course (40.9%), whereas a reading
course was rated as the least wanted course (2.3%).The missing data shown in this
table referred to the respondents who do not wish to be involved in a training course.
The results from this study correlate with the findings of Khakhai (2014). Although
Khakhaiâs research showed that the most problematic skill that needed to be improved
was writing, most respondents preferred to participate in other English training
courses such as a listening and speaking course.
Table 4.3.3 Number of classes per week
Classes per week Frequency Percentage
1 class per week 18 40.9
2 classes per week 20 45.5
3 classes per week 0 0
Other 0 0
Missing 6 13.6
Total 44 100
Table 4.3.3 shows that most of the respondents would like to be trained in
two classes per week (45.5%) while 40.9=% of respondents want to participate in an
English course once a week. The missing data in this table represents the respondents
that do not want to participate in an English course(13.6%).
Ref. code: 25595821040606JOBRef. code: 25595821040606JOB
23
Table 4.3.4 Length of Class
Length of Class Frequency Percentage
1 hour 13 29.5
1.30 hours 16 36.4
2 hours 9 20.5
Other 0 0
Missing 6 13.6
Total 44 100
As shown in Table 4.3.4, the majority of respondentsprefer1.30 hours
class (36.4%). A one-hour class and two-hour class are presented as the minority
result (29.5%, 20.5%). The missing data of this table refers to the respondents who do
not want to participate in an English course(13.6%).
Table 4.3.5 Period of Classes
Period of Classes Frequency Percentage
Weekdays during working time 16 36.4
Weekdays after work 20 45.5
Saturday-Sunday 2 4.5
Other 0 0
Missing 6 13.6
Total 44 100
Table 4.3.5 indicates that most of the respondents want to be involved in
an English course on weekdays after work (45.5%). The second ranked group of
respondents want to participate in an English course on weekdays during working
time (36.4). Finally, the last ranked group want to be trained on Saturday to Sunday
(4.5%). The missing data in this table represents the respondents who do not want to
participate in an English course (13.6%).
Ref. code: 25595821040606JOBRef. code: 25595821040606JOB
24
Table 4.3.6 Instructor
Instructor Frequency Percentage
Thai 10 22.7
Native Speaker 22 50
Non Native Speaker 6 13.6
Missing 6 13.6
Total 44 100
With regard to the instructor, half of the respondents want to be taught by
a native speaker instructor (50%),whereas 22.7% of respondents prefer a Thai
instructor. Lastly,13.6 % of respondents indicated that the instructor can be either
Thai or a native speaker, depending on the course. The missing data refers to the
respondents who do not want to participate in an English course (13.6%).
Ref. code: 25595821040606JOBRef. code: 25595821040606JOB
25
CHAPTER 5
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
This chapter contains the summary of findings, the conclusion and the
recommendations for further research.
5.1 Summary of findings
This part aims to answer the following two research questions
5.1.1 What are the English communication skills that Queen Sirikit
Museum of Textiles officials want to improve?
As can be seen in Table 4.2.5, writing skill had the lowest score of
average mean score, followed by listening skill, reading skill, and speaking skill.
Therefore, writing skill was rated as the most needed communication skill that Queen
Sirikit Museum of Textiles officials need to improve. In addition, writing formal
letters was rated by respondents as the activity that needed to be improved the most,
followed by writing email correspondence, filling in forms, e.g. registration forms,
booking confirmations, and writing resumes or curriculum vitae. According to Guffey
and Du-Babcok (2010),writing skill is important in business communication because
it expresses the ideas and feelings of the senders. Writing skill was indicated as one of
the most crucial skills that officials have to develop in order to communicate
effectively(Soda,2014; Tanviboolaya,2014; and Prapawuittkul,2004).
5.1.2 What are the implications or suggestions in order to use for
Queen Sirikit Museum of Textiles training need of English language
communication?
According to the target needs analysis of Hutchinson and Waters (2010),
writing skill, especially writing formal letters, was rated by QSMT officials as the
most lacking skill. However, the wants results summarized in Table 4.3.2 showed that
a speaking course was rated as the most desirable course that QSMT officials want to
be involved in. The conflict between lacks and wants might affect the motivation of
learners. Therefore, when the organization decides to provide a training course, the
Ref. code: 25595821040606JOBRef. code: 25595821040606JOB
26
perception of needs, such as objective needs (perceived by the course designer) and
objective needs (perceived by learner) have to be considered as well (Hutchinson and
Waters,2010).
5.2 Conclusion
There are four conclusions from the previous discussion above.
5.2.1 Writing skill was rated as the most needed communication skill that
Queen Sirikit Museum of Textiles officials would like to improve.
5.2.2 Writing formal letters was rated at the most needed activity that
Queen Sirikit Museum of Textiles officials should focus on.
5.2.3 The organization should provide an English training course for
officials in order to effectively support their work function.
5.2.4 The organization should determine the objective needs and
subjective needs regarding a training course.
5.3 Recommendations for further research
5.3.1 Further research should compare the motivation to attend an
objective training needs course and subjective training needs course.
5.3.2 Further research should take into consideration the training needs of
each department, since the work functions are different.
Ref. code: 25595821040606JOBRef. code: 25595821040606JOB
27
REFERENCES
Atkins, W. T., Jacobson, J. A., & Neuber, K. A. (2001). Needs assessment: a model
for community planning. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage.
Basturkmen, H. (2010). Developing Courses in English for Specific
Purposes. Palgrave Mcmillan: New York
Charunsri, K. (2011). The needs and problems of English language skills for the hotel
front office Staff in Chinatown, Bangkok. Retrieved Nov 2, 2016, from
http://203.131.219.173/thesis/lg/0606/title-appendices.pdf
Coombe, C. A. (2013). The Cambridge guide to second language assessment.
New York: Cambridge University Press.
Dudley-Evans, T. & St John, M. (2011). Developments in English for Specific
Purposes: A multi-disciplinary approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
Guffey, M, & Du-Babcock, B. (2010). Essentials of business
communication. Singapore: Cengage Learning Asia Pte Ltd.
Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (2010). English for specific purposes a learning-centred
approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Prapawuttikul, J. (2004). English writing and speaking needs analysis of MIT support
staff. Unpublished Masterâs research paper. The University of the Thai
Chamber of Commerce, Bangkok, Thailand.
Pongjumpa, S. (2011). A Survey of the Needs of English Proficiency of Five-Star
Hotelâs Staff and Representatives in Bangkok and the Aspect of Needs
Referring to Hotel English and General English, Thammasat University,
Language Institute, Teaching English as a Foreign Language.
Kaufman, R., & Guerra-Lopez, I. (2013). Needs assessment for organizational
success. Alexandria, VA: ASTD Press.
Khamkaew, S. (2009). Needs and problems in English listening and speaking skills:
a case study of the Metropolitan police officers at counter service at
Chana Songkram police station.Retrived Nov 2, 2016, from
http://thesis.swu.ac.th/swuthesis/Bus_Eng_Int_Com/Suthee_K.pdf
Khakhai, K. (2011). English Language Needs Analysis of Thai Massage Therapists at
Ref. code: 25595821040606JOBRef. code: 25595821040606JOB
28
Spa son Khaosarn Road, Bangkok, Thammasat University, Language Institute,
Teaching English as a Foreign Language.
McConnell, J. H. (2003). How to identify your organization's training needs:
a practical guide to needs analysis. New York: AMA .
Murphy, B. (2004). The definition of the museum. Retrieved May 10, 2017 From
http://icom.museum/fileadmin/user_upload/pdf/ICOM_News/2004-
2/ENG/p3_2004-2.pdf
Piriyasilpa, Y. (2014). English Language Needs of Tourism Industries in Khon Kaen
Province. Retrieved April 18, 2017 from
http://tourismtaat.siam.edu/images/magazine/m9b2/16-30.pdf.
Robinson, P. C. (1980). English for specific purposes: the present position. Oxford:
Pergamon Press.
Suparan, C. (2011). A Study of the Needs and Problems in Using English with
Foreigners among Hotel Receptionists in Kanchanaburi,
Thammasat University, LanguageInstitute, Teaching English for Careers.
Tanviboolaya, L. (2014). Problems and Needs in Business English Writing Skill of
Employees at Electronics Source Co.,LTD., Thammasat University, Language
Institute, Teaching English as a Foreign Language.
Tobey, D. D. (2005). Needs assessment basics: a complete, how-to guide to help you:
design effective, on-target training solutions, get support, ensure bottom-line
impact. Alexandria, VA: ASTD Press.
Ref. code: 25595821040606JOBRef. code: 25595821040606JOB
30
APPENDIX A
QUESTIONNAIRE
This questionnaire is a part of fulfillment of the requirements for the
degree of Master of Arts in English for Careers program, Language Institute of
Thammasat University, Thailand. Information of the respondents will be used for this
study only. The questionnaire consists of three parts in three pages. Part I is about the
general information of respondents. Part II is about the needs of using English
language communication divided into four areas: listening, speaking, reading, and
writing. Part III is about the suggestions for English language training course.
Part I : General Information
Instruction : Please put in the provided box.
1. Gender Male Female
2. Age 20-30 31-40 41-50 51-60
3. Education
Less than Bachelorâs Degree
Bachelorâs Degree
Higher than Bachelorâs Degree
4. What is your job positionâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶDepartmentâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶ...
5. How many years have you been learning English in formal education system?
less than 5 years 5 years 10 years more than 10 years
6. Is English necessary for your current position?
Yes WhyâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶ..
No WhyâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶ..
Ref. code: 25595821040606JOBRef. code: 25595821040606JOB
31
7. How many days have you used English language for communication?
PartII : The needs of using English language for communication
Instruction : Please put into the provided box to rate your level of
agreement in English language communication skill as following;
5 is Strongly agree
4 is Agree
3 is Neither agree nor disagree
2 is Disagree
1 is Strongly disagree
Listening
Listening Activities
Level of agreement
Y
5
4
4
4
3
2
2
1
1
1.I understand the actual
conversation
2.I understand what foreign
customers/staff require
D
3.I understand when foreign
customers/staff speak in a different
accent
4.I understand English lectures and
presentations
English Skill
The Frequency of using English
More than 5 days
per week
3-5 days per week Less than 3 days
per week
Listening
Speaking
Reading
Writing
Ref. code: 25595821040606JOBRef. code: 25595821040606JOB
32
Speaking
Speaking Activities
Level of agreement
5
5
5
4
3
3
2
2
1
1
1.I can give greetings and daily
communication
2.I can give the introduction and
description of my work
3.I can make a polite request
4.I can give bad news or refusals
Reading
Reading Activities
Level of agreement
5
5
4
4
3
3
2
2
1
1
1. I can read English emails
2.I can read museumâs signs and
exhibitionâs description
3.I can read work-related texts,
journals or articles
4.I can read contracts or
agreements
Ref. code: 25595821040606JOBRef. code: 25595821040606JOB
33
Writing
Writing Activities
Level of agreement
5
5
5
4
3
3
2
2
1
1
1.I can write emails
correspondence
2.I can write formal letters
3.I can fill in forms, e.g.
registration forms, booking
confirmations
4.I can write my resume or
curriculum vitae
Part III :The suggestions for training English language
Instruction : Please put in the provided box.
1.Would you like to participate in English language training course?
Yes
No, please stop answering the questionnaire
2.Please identify what English language communication skill you need to train
Listening Speaking
Reading Writing
3.How often should the English language training course take place?
Once a week Twice a week
Three times a week Other(Please identify)âĶdays a week
4.What should be the duration of each class?
1 hour 1.30 hours
2 hours Other(Please identify)âĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶ
5.What date you prefer to have the English language training course?
Weekdays during work time Weekdays after work
Saturday-Sunday Other (Please specify)âĶâĶâĶâĶâĶ.
Ref. code: 25595821040606JOBRef. code: 25595821040606JOB
34
6.What instructor do you prefer to have for teaching English language training
course?
Thai instructor
Native speaker instructor
Non-native speaker instructor
7. Instruction: Please identify your suggestion about what activities or topics you want
for your training English language
âĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶ.
âĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶ.
âĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶ.
Thank you
Ref. code: 25595821040606JOBRef. code: 25595821040606JOB
35
APPENDIX B
QUESTIONNAIRE (In Thai)
āđāļāļāļŠāļāļāļāļēāļĄ
āļāļ§āļēāļĄāļ āļēāđāļāļāđāļāļāļēāļĢāđāļāļāļāļĐāļ°āļ āļēāļĐāļēāļāļāļāļĪāļĐāđāļāļāļāļēāļĢāļŠāļāļŠāļēāļĢāļāļāļāđāļāļēāļŦāļāļēāļ
āļāļāļāļ āļāļāļāļēāđāļāļŠāļĄāđāļāļāļāļĢāļ°āļāļēāļāđāļāļēāļŠāļĢāļāļāļāļĢāļ°āļāļĢāļĄāļĢāļēāļāļāļāļēāļ
āđāļāļāļŠāļāļāļāļēāļĄāļāđāļāļāļŠāļ§āļāļŦāļāļāļāļāļāļĢāļēāļĒāļ§āļāļēāļāļēāļĢāļāļāļāļ§āļēāļāļŠāļĢāļ°āđāļāļāļāļĢāļ°āļāļāļāļāļāļāļāļēāļĢāļĻāļāļĐāļēāļāļēāļĄāļŦāļĨāļāļŠāļāļĢāļĻāļĨāļāļ°āļĻāļēāļŠāļāļĢ
āļĄāļŦāļēāļāļāļāļāļŠāļēāļāļēāļ āļēāļĐāļēāļāļāļāļĪāļĐāđāļāļāļāļēāļāļāļŠāļāļēāļāļāļ āļēāļĐāļēāļĄāļŦāļēāļ§āļāļĒāļēāļĨāļĒāļāļĢāļĢāļĄāļĻāļēāļŠāļāļĢ
āļ§āļāļāļāļĢāļ°āļŠāļāļāļāļāļāđāļāļāļŠāļāļāļāļēāļĄāļāļāļāļāđāļāļāđāļāđāļāļāļĻāļāļĐāļēāļāļ§āļēāļĄāļ āļēāđāļāļāđāļāļāļēāļĢāđāļāļāļāļĐāļ°āļ āļēāļĐāļēāļāļāļāļĪāļĐāđāļāļāļāļēāļĢāļŠāļāļŠāļēāļĢ
āļāļāļāđāļāļēāļŦāļāļēāļāđāļāļāļŠāļāļāļāļēāļĄāđāļāļāļāļāļāđāļāļ 3 āļŠāļ§āļāļāļāļ
āļŠāļ§āļāļ 1 āļāļāļĄāļĨāļāļ§āđāļāļāļāļāļāļāļāļāđāļāļāļŠāļāļāļāļēāļĄ
āļŠāļ§āļāļ 2 āļāļ§āļēāļĄāļ āļēāđāļāļāđāļāļāļēāļĢāđāļāļāļāļĐāļ°āļ āļēāļĐāļēāļāļāļāļĪāļĐāđāļāļāļāļēāļĢāļŠāļāļŠāļēāļĢ
āļŠāļ§āļāļ 3 āļāļ§āļēāļĄāļāļāđāļŦāļāđāļāļĒāļ§āļāļāļŦāļĨāļāļŠāļāļĢāļ āļēāļĐāļēāļāļāļāļĪāļĐāđāļāļāļāļēāļĢāļŠāļāļŠāļēāļĢāļāļāļāļāļāļēāļĢ
āļŠāļ§āļāļ 1 āļāļāļĄāļĨāļāļ§āđāļāļāļāļāļāļāļāļāđāļāļāļŠāļāļāļāļēāļĄ
āļ āļēāļāđāļāļāđāļāļĢāļāļ āļēāđāļāļĢāļāļāļŦāļĄāļēāļĒāļĨāļāđāļāđāļĨāļ°āļĢāļ°āļāļ āļēāļāļāļāļĨāļāđāļāļāļāļāļ§āļēāļāļāļ āļēāļŦāļāļ
1.āđāļāļĻ āļāļēāļĒ āļŦāļāļ
2.āļāļēāļĒ 20-30āļ 31-40āļ 41-50āļ 51-60āļ
3.āļāļēāļĢāļĻāļāļĐāļē
āļ āļēāļāļ§āļēāļĢāļ°āļāļāļāļĢāļāļāļēāļāļĢ
āļĢāļ°āļāļāļāļĢāļāļāļēāļāļĢ
āļŠāļāļāļ§āļēāļĢāļ°āļāļāļāļĢāļāļāļēāļāļĢ
4. āļāļēāļāļāļāļāļāļāļēāļāđāļāļ āļēāđāļŦāļāļ..................................āļāļēāļĒ................................................................
5.āļāļēāļāļĻāļāļĐāļēāļ āļēāļĐāļēāļāļāļāļĪāļĐāđāļāļĢāļ°āļāļāļāļēāļĢāļĻāļāļĐāļēāļāļāļāđāļāļāļĢāļ°āļĒāļ°āđāļ§āļĨāļēāđāļāļēāđāļ
āļāļāļĒāļāļ§āļē 5 āļ 5 āļ 10 āļ āļĄāļēāļāļāļ§āļē 10 āļ
Ref. code: 25595821040606JOBRef. code: 25595821040606JOB
36
6.āļāļēāļāļāļāļ§āļēāļ āļēāļĐāļēāļāļāļāļĪāļĐāļĄāļāļ§āļēāļĄāļ āļēāđāļāļāđāļāļ āļēāđāļŦāļāļāļāļēāļāļāļāļāļāļēāļāļŦāļĢāļāđāļĄ
āļ āļēāđāļāļ āđāļāļĢāļēāļ°.....................................................................................................
āđāļĄāļ āļēāđāļāļ āđāļāļĢāļēāļ°.....................................................................................................
7.āļāļ§āļēāļĄāļŠāļĄ āļēāđāļŠāļĄāļāđāļāļāļēāļĢāđāļāļ āļēāļĐāļēāļāļāļāļĪāļĐāļĢāļ°āļŦāļ§āļēāļāļāļēāļĢāļāļāļāļāļŦāļāļēāļāļāļāļāļāļēāļāļĄāļĄāļēāļāļāļāļĒāđāļāļĒāļāđāļ
āļŠāļ§āļāļ 2 āļāļ§āļēāļĄāļ āļēāđāļāļāđāļāļāļēāļĢāđāļāļāļāļĐāļ°āļ āļēāļĐāļēāļāļāļāļĪāļĐāđāļāļāļāļēāļĢāļŠāļāļŠāļēāļĢ
āļ āļēāļāđāļāļāđāļāļĢāļāļ āļēāđāļāļĢāļāļāļŦāļĄāļēāļĒāļĨāļāđāļāļāļ āļēāļŦāļāļāđāļŦāđāļāļāļāļĢāļ°āđāļĄāļāļĢāļ°āļāļāļāļ§āļēāļĄāļāļāđāļŦāļāļāļāļāļēāļĢāļāļāļāļēāļāļāļĐāļ°āļāļēāļĢāļŠāļāļŠāļēāļĢ
āļ āļēāļĐāļēāļāļāļāļĪāļĐāđāļāļĒ
5 āļŦāļĄāļēāļĒāļāļ āđāļŦāļāļāļ§āļĒāļĄāļēāļāļāļŠāļ
4 āļŦāļĄāļēāļĒāļāļ āđāļŦāļāļāļ§āļĒāļĄāļēāļ
3 āļŦāļĄāļēāļĒāļāļ āđāļŦāļāļāļ§āļĒāļāļēāļāļāļĨāļēāļ
2 āļŦāļĄāļēāļĒāļāļ āđāļŦāļāļāļ§āļĒāļāļāļĒ
1 āļŦāļĄāļēāļĒāļāļ āđāļŦāļāļāļ§āļĒāļāļāļĒāļāļŠāļ
āļāļāļĐāļ°āļāļēāļĢāđāļāļ āļēāļĐāļēāļāļāļāļĪāļĐ āļāļ§āļēāļĄāļāđāļāļāļēāļĢāđāļāļ āļēāļĐāļēāļāļāļāļĪāļĐ
āļĄāļēāļāļāļ§āļē 5 āļ§āļāļāļāļŠāļāļāļēāļŦ 3-5 āļ§āļāļāļāļŠāļāļāļēāļŦ āļāļāļĒāļāļ§āļē 3 āļ§āļāļāļāļŠāļāļāļēāļŦ
āļāļēāļĢāļāļ
āļāļēāļĢāļāļ
āļāļēāļĢāļāļēāļ
āļāļēāļĢāđāļāļĒāļ
Ref. code: 25595821040606JOBRef. code: 25595821040606JOB
37
āļāļāļĐāļ°āļāļēāļĢāļāļ
āļāļāļĐāļ°āļāļēāļĢāļāļāļ āļēāļĐāļēāļāļāļāļĪāļĐ
āļĢāļ°āļāļāļāļ§āļēāļĄāđāļŦāļāļāļ§āļĒ
5
āļĄāļēāļāļāļŠāļ
4
āļĄāļēāļ
3
āļāļēāļāļāļĨāļēāļ
2
āļāļāļĒ
1
āļāļāļĒāļāļŠāļ
1.āļāļēāļāđāļāļēāđāļāļāļāļŠāļāļāļāļēāļāļāļāļāļŠāļāļāļāļēāļāļēāļ§āļāļēāļāļāļēāļ
āļŦāļēāļāļāļāļāļĄāļāļēāļĢāļŠāļāļāļāļēāļāļāļŦāļāļēāļāļ
2.āļāļēāļāđāļāļēāđāļāļāļāļĄāļĨāļāļāđāļāļēāļāļĄ/āļāļĢāļ§āļĄāļāļēāļāļāļēāļ§āļāļēāļāļāļēāļ
āļĢāļāļāļāļ
D
3.āļāļēāļāđāļāļēāđāļāļāļāļŠāļāļāļāļēāđāļĄāļāļŠāļāļŠāļēāļĢāļāļāļāđāļāļēāļāļĄ/
āļāļĢāļ§āļĄāļāļēāļāļāļēāļ§āļāļēāļāļāļēāļāļāļĄāļŠ āļēāđāļāļĒāļāļ āļēāļĐāļēāđāļāļāļāļēāļāļāļ
4.āļāļēāļāđāļāļēāđāļāļāļēāļĢāļāļĢāļĢāļĒāļēāļĒāļŦāļĢāļāļāļēāļĢāļ āļēāđāļŠāļāļāļāļĨāļāļēāļāļ
āđāļāļāļ āļēāļĐāļēāļāļāļāļĪāļĐ
āļāļāļĐāļ°āļāļēāļĢāļāļ
āļāļāļĐāļ°āļāļēāļĢāļāļāļ āļēāļĐāļēāļāļāļāļĪāļĐ
āļĢāļ°āļāļāļāļ§āļēāļĄāđāļŦāļāļāļ§āļĒ
5
āļĄāļēāļāļāļŠāļ
4
āļĄāļēāļ
3
āļāļēāļāļāļĨāļēāļ
2
āļāļāļĒ
1
āļāļāļĒāļāļŠāļ
1.āļāļēāļāļŠāļēāļĄāļēāļĢāļāļāļĨāļēāļ§āļāļāļāļĢāļāļŦāļĢāļāļāļĨāļēāļ§āļāļāļāļēāļĒāđāļāļ
āļ āļēāļĐāļēāļāļāļāļĪāļĐ
2.āļāļēāļāļŠāļēāļĄāļēāļĢāļāļāļĨāļēāļ§āļ āļēāđāļāļ°āļ āļēāļāļāđāļāļāđāļĨāļ°āļāļāļāļēāļĒ
āđāļāļĒāļ§āļāļāļŦāļāļēāļāļŦāļĢāļāļāļēāļāļāļāļēāļāļāļāļāļāđāļ
D
3.āļāļēāļāļŠāļēāļĄāļēāļĢāļāđāļāļāļĢāļ°āđāļĒāļāđāļāļāļēāļĢāļĢāļāļāļāļāļāļĒāļēāļāļŠāļ āļēāļ
4.āļāļēāļāļŠāļēāļĄāļēāļĢāļāđāļāļāļāļēāļ§āļĢāļēāļĒāļŦāļĢāļāļāļāļāļāļāđāļŠāļāļāļĒāļēāļ
āļŠāļ āļēāļāđāļ
Ref. code: 25595821040606JOBRef. code: 25595821040606JOB
38
āļāļāļĐāļ°āļāļēāļĢāļāļēāļ
āļāļāļĐāļ°āļāļēāļĢāļāļēāļāļ āļēāļĐāļēāļāļāļāļĪāļĐ
āļĢāļ°āļāļāļāļ§āļēāļĄāđāļŦāļāļāļ§āļĒ
5
āļĄāļēāļāļāļŠāļ
4
āļĄāļēāļ
3
āļāļēāļāļāļĨāļēāļ
2
āļāļāļĒ
1
āļāļāļĒāļāļŠāļ
1.āļāļēāļāđāļāļēāđāļāļāļāļāļ§āļēāļĄāđāļāļāļāļŦāļĄāļēāļĒāļāđāļĨāļāļāļĢāļāļāļāļŠ
2.āļāļēāļāļŠāļēāļĄāļēāļĢāļāļāļēāļāļāļēāļĒāđāļĨāļ°āļ āļēāļāļāļāļēāļĒāđāļāļāļŦāļēāļāļāļ
āļāļāļĢāļĢāļĻāļāļēāļĢāđāļāļāļāļāļ āļāļāđāļ
D
3.āļāļēāļāļŠāļēāļĄāļēāļĢāļāļāļēāļāļāļāļāļ§āļēāļĄāļ§āļēāļĢāļŠāļēāļĢāļŦāļĢāļāļŦāļāļāļŠāļāļ
āđāļāļĒāļ§āļāļāļāļāļāļāļēāļāļāļāļēāļāļāļāļāļāđāļ
4.āļāļēāļāļŠāļēāļĄāļēāļĢāļāļāļēāļāļŦāļāļāļŠāļāļāļēāļŦāļĢāļāđāļāļāļŠāļēāļĢāļāļāļāļāļ
āļāļāļāļāļāļāļ āļāļāđāļ
āļāļāļĐāļ°āļāļēāļĢāđāļāļĒāļ
āļāļāļĐāļ°āļāļēāļĢāđāļāļĒāļāļ āļēāļĐāļēāļāļāļāļĪāļĐ
āļĢāļ°āļāļāļāļ§āļēāļĄāđāļŦāļāļāļ§āļĒ
5
āļĄāļēāļāļāļŠāļ
4
āļĄāļēāļ
3
āļāļēāļāļāļĨāļēāļ
2
āļāļāļĒ
1
āļāļāļĒāļāļŠāļ
1.āļāļēāļāļŠāļēāļĄāļēāļĢāļāđāļāļĒāļāđāļāļāļāļāļāļāļŦāļĄāļēāļĒāļāđāļĨāļāļāļĢāļāļāļāļŠ
2.āļāļēāļāļŠāļēāļĄāļēāļĢāļāđāļāļĒāļāļŦāļāļāļŠāļāļĢāļēāļāļāļēāļĢāļŦāļĢāļāļāļāļŦāļĄāļēāļĒ
āđāļāļāđāļāļāļāļēāļāļāļēāļĢāđāļ
D
3.āļāļēāļāļŠāļēāļĄāļēāļĢāļāļāļĢāļāļāļāļāļĄāļĨāđāļāļāļāļāļĄāļĨāļŠ āļēāļŦāļĢāļāļāļēāļĢ
āļĨāļāļāļ°āđāļāļĒāļāļāļāļĄāļĨāļŠ āļēāļŦāļĢāļāļāļēāļĢāļāļāļāđāļāļāļāļ
4.āļāļēāļāļŠāļēāļĄāļēāļĢāļāđāļāļĒāļāļĢāļēāļĒāļāļēāļāļŦāļĢāļāļāļāļāļ§āļēāļĄāļāļāļēāļāļŠāļ
āđāļāļāđāļāļ°āļ āļēāļāļĢāļ°āļ§āļāļāļāļāļāļāđāļāļāļŦāļĢāļāļĢāļēāļĒāļāļēāļāļāļĨāļāļēāļĢ
āļāļāļāļāļāļēāļāđāļāļāļāļ
Ref. code: 25595821040606JOBRef. code: 25595821040606JOB
39
āļŠāļ§āļāļ 3 āļāļ§āļēāļĄāļāļāđāļŦāļāđāļāļĒāļ§āļāļāļŦāļĨāļāļŠāļāļĢāļ āļēāļĐāļēāļāļāļāļĪāļĐāđāļāļāļāļēāļĢāļŠāļāļŠāļēāļĢāļāļāļāļāļāļēāļĢ
āļ āļēāļāđāļāļāđāļāļĢāļāļ āļēāđāļāļĢāļāļāļŦāļĄāļēāļĒāļĨāļāđāļāļŦāļĢāļāļĢāļ°āļāļ āļēāļāļāļāļĨāļāđāļāļāļāļāļ§āļēāļāļāļ āļēāļŦāļāļ
1.āļŦāļēāļāļāļāļāļ āļāļāļāļāļāļēāļĢāļāļāļĢāļĄāļ āļēāļĐāļēāļāļāļāļĪāļĐāļŠ āļēāļŦāļĢāļāđāļāļēāļŦāļāļēāļāļāļēāļāļāļāļāļāļēāļĢāđāļāļēāļĢāļ§āļĄāļāļēāļĢāļāļāļāļāļĢāļĄāļŦāļĢāļāđāļĄ
āļāļāļāļāļēāļĢ (āļŦāļēāļāļāļāļāļāļēāļĢāļāļĢāļāļēāļ āļēāđāļāļāļŠāļāļāļāļēāļĄāļāļāđāļāļāļāļ 2)
āđāļĄāļāļāļāļāļēāļĢ
2.āļāļāļĐāļ°āđāļāļāļēāļĢāļŠāļāļŠāļēāļĢāļ āļēāļĐāļēāļāļāļāļĪāļĐāļāļēāļāđāļāļāļāļēāļāļāļāļāļāļēāļĢāļāļ°āļāļāļāļēāļĄāļēāļāļāļŠāļ(āļāļĢāļāļēāđāļĨāļāļāđāļāļĒāļ 1 āļāļ)
āļāļāļĐāļ°āļāļēāļĢāļāļ āļāļāļĐāļ°āļāļēāļĢāļāļ
āļāļāļĐāļ°āļāļēāļĢāļāļēāļ āļāļāļĐāļ°āļāļēāļĢāđāļāļĒāļ
3.āļ āļēāļāļ§āļāļāļĢāļāļāđāļŦāļĄāļēāļ°āļŠāļĄāļŠ āļēāļŦāļĢāļāļāļēāļĢāļāļāļāļāļĢāļĄ
āļŠāļāļāļēāļŦāļĨāļ° 1 āļāļĢāļ āļŠāļāļāļēāļŦāļĨāļ° 2 āļāļĢāļ
āļŠāļāļāļēāļŦāļĨāļ° 3 āļāļĢāļ āļāļāđāđāļāļĢāļāļĢāļ°āļ........................... āļāļĢāļāļāļāļŠāļāļāļēāļŦ
4.āļāļēāļĢāļāļāļĢāļĄāļ āļēāļĐāļēāļāļāļāļĪāļĐāđāļāļĨāļ°āļāļĢāļāļāļ§āļĢāļĄāļĢāļ°āļĒāļ°āđāļ§āļĨāļēāļāļēāļāđāļāļēāđāļ
1 āļāļ§āđāļĄāļ 1.30 āļāļ§āđāļĄāļ
2 āļāļ§āđāļĄāļ āļāļāđāđāļāļĢāļāļĢāļ°āļ...........................................
5.āļāļēāļāļāļāļ§āļēāļ§āļāđāļāđāļŦāļĄāļēāļ°āļŠāļĄāļŠ āļēāļŦāļĢāļāļāļēāļĢāļāļāļĢāļĄāļ āļēāļĐāļēāļāļāļāļĪāļĐ
āļ§āļāļāļāļāļĢ-āļ§āļāļĻāļāļĢāđāļāđāļ§āļĨāļēāļāļēāļ āļ§āļāļāļāļāļĢ-āļ§āļāļĻāļāļĢāļŦāļĨāļāđāļĨāļāļāļēāļ
āļ§āļāđāļŠāļēāļĢâāļ§āļāļāļēāļāļāļĒ āļāļāđāđāļāļĢāļāļĢāļ°āļ...........................................
6.āđāļāļāļēāļĢāļāļāļĢāļĄāļ āļēāļĐāļēāļāļāļāļĪāļĐāļāļēāļāļāļāļāļāļēāļĢāđāļĢāļĒāļāļāļāļāļāļāļŠāļāļāļāļēāļāđāļ
āļāļāļāļŠāļāļāļāļēāļ§āđāļāļĒ
āļāļāļāļŠāļāļāļāļēāļ§āļāļēāļāļāļēāļāļāđāļāļāđāļāļēāļāļāļāļ āļēāļĐāļēāđāļāļāļāļēāļ§āļāļāļāļĪāļĐāļāļēāļ§āļāđāļĄāļĢāļāļāđāļāļāļāļ
āļāļāđāđāļāļĢāļāļĢāļ°āļ.......................................................................................................
7.āļŦāļ§āļāļāđāļĨāļ°āļ āļēāđāļāļ°āļ āļēāđāļāļāļēāļĢāļāļāļāļāļāļĢāļĢāļĄāļāļāļēāļāļāļāļāļāļēāļĢāļŠ āļēāļŦāļĢāļāļāļēāļĢāļāļāļāļēāļĢāļāļāļĢāļĄāļ āļēāļĐāļēāļāļāļāļĪāļĐ
.....................................................................................................................................
.....................................................................................................................................
âĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶâĶ..
āļāļāļāļāļāļāļĢāļ°āļāļāļāļāļēāļāļŠāļĨāļ°āđāļ§āļĨāļēāđāļāļāļēāļĢāļāļāļāđāļāļāļŠāļāļāļāļēāļĄāđāļāļāļāļĒāļēāļāļŠāļ
Ref. code: 25595821040606JOBRef. code: 25595821040606JOB
40
BIOGRAPHY
Name Miss Nuchada Pianprasankit
Date of Birth February 27,1990
Educational Attainment
2012: Bachelor Degree of Arts
Work Position Conservator
Queen Sirikit Museum of Textiles
Scholarship -
Publications
Work Experiences 2012-2013: Visitor Service Officer
Queen Sirikit Museum of Textiles
Before they are gone: Capturing and sharing the
traditional methods of textile preservation in
Thailand, ICOM-CC 17 th Triennial Conference
Preprints, 2014