21
Prof Klaus Fricke Are ‘batch garage digesters’ a viable alternative to in-vessel composting in Australia? Johannes Biala ([email protected])

a viable alternative to in-vessel composting in Australia?

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    4

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 2: a viable alternative to in-vessel composting in Australia?

Organics Processing Facilities

Year No facilities Tonnage input

2004/05 178 4.2 M

2011/12 206 5.5 M

Source: MRA Consulting

Richgro

Earthpower

ReWaste

Spring Farm

Composting Facilities 2016

Page 3: a viable alternative to in-vessel composting in Australia?

Tunnel Composting is Popular

Kembla Grange - Soilco

Grafton – JR Richards & Sons

Bulla – Veolia

Page 4: a viable alternative to in-vessel composting in Australia?

Tunnel Composting – Tunnel Digestion

If tunnel composting,

why not tunnel digestion?

Page 5: a viable alternative to in-vessel composting in Australia?

Development of Biogas Plants and Installed Electrical

Generation Capacity [MW] in Germany

Page 6: a viable alternative to in-vessel composting in Australia?

Small Proportion of AD Capacity in Germany

serves Waste Sector

Predominantly

Municipal

Organics (FOGO)

75 plants

2.4 M tpa (total)

1.9 M tpa (AD)

52 MWel

Predominantly

Commercial

Organics (FO)

38 plants

1.9 M tpa

50 MWel

2014/15

Page 7: a viable alternative to in-vessel composting in Australia?

Development of FOGO Processing in Germany

40%

60%

Composting Anaerobic Digestion

Source: Bundesgütegemeinschaft Kompost

Page 8: a viable alternative to in-vessel composting in Australia?

Anaerobic Digestion Processing Options

Anaerobic Digestion

mesophilic - thermophilic

Continuous process Dis-continuous process

Wet digestion

DM < 12 - 15% Dry digestion

DM > 25 - 35%

Dry digestion

DM > 33 - 50%

Single stage

process

Multi stage

process

Page 9: a viable alternative to in-vessel composting in Australia?

Anaerobic Digestion Processing Options

Used for FOGO in Germany (2013)

330,350

1,028,649

537,249 491,400

0.00

200,000.00

400,000.00

600,000.00

800,000.00

1,000,000.00

1,200,000.00

Nass Trocken Trocken, kontinuierlich Trocken, diskontinuierlich

t/a

8

46

23

17

23

Wet Dry

total Dry

contin.

Dry

dis-contin.

Page 10: a viable alternative to in-vessel composting in Australia?

Dry AD Technologies

- Continuous Processing

DRANCO

HITACHI ZOSSEN INOVA - KOMPOGAS

LARAN - STRABAG

THÖNI

Page 11: a viable alternative to in-vessel composting in Australia?

BEKON /

Eggersmann

Dry AD Technologies

- Dis-continuous Processing

Zero

Waste

Energy

“Batch

Garage

Digesters”

Page 12: a viable alternative to in-vessel composting in Australia?

Batch Garage Digesters

Key Components & Processing Schematic

Source: BEKON

CHP

Page 13: a viable alternative to in-vessel composting in Australia?

Batch Garage Digesters

Processing Stages

Stage 1: Aerobic, Heating Stage 2: Anaerobic, Percolation, Methane

Generation

Stage 3: Aerobic

Source: BIOFerm

Page 14: a viable alternative to in-vessel composting in Australia?

Biogas Generation at Various Temperatures

Days

Re

lati

ve

Bio

ga

s Y

ield

[%

]

Thermophilic process increases

biogas yield markedly

at any given retention time

Page 15: a viable alternative to in-vessel composting in Australia?

Biogas Generation over Time

Days

Re

lati

ve

Bio

ga

s Y

ield

[%

]

0 10 20

Days

Daily Methane Yield from FOGO

[m3/m2 digester surface area]

Page 16: a viable alternative to in-vessel composting in Australia?

Multiple Digesters for Constant Biogas Supply

Days

Re

lati

ve

Bio

ga

s Y

ield

[%

]

0 10 20

Days

Daily Methane Yield from FOGO

[m3/m2 digester surface area]

Date

Bio

gas

Yie

ld [

m3/d

ay]

Minimum of 4 Digesters

Page 17: a viable alternative to in-vessel composting in Australia?

Biogas Yield

Rule of thumb: 1 t FOGO generates 100 m3 biogas with 60% methane

and energy content of 600 kWh

Raw Material Quantity

[m3 / t fermenter

input]

CH4

[vol.-%]

FOGO (mixture of food and

garden organics) 75 – 136 53 - 65

Food organics 123 – 178 53 - 68

Page 18: a viable alternative to in-vessel composting in Australia?

Potential Options for Utilising Biogas

Purification (removal of H2O, CO2, H2S, NH3)

Biogas (crude)

CHP Unit

Heat &

Electricity

‘Aspirational Targets’

Page 19: a viable alternative to in-vessel composting in Australia?

CHP Efficiency Parameter

%

Total energy 100

Electrical efficiency 33 - 45

Thermal efficiency 35 - 56

Loss 10 - 15

CHP efficiency 85 - 90

Operational use 20 - 30

Gross surplus energy 58 – 72

Curing / vehicles 25 - 30

Net surplus energy 30 – 45

Energy in generated gas 100%

Source: Clark Energy

Page 20: a viable alternative to in-vessel composting in Australia?

Investment and operating costs for 18,000 tpa

dry batch digestion facility (Germany, 2012) (Converted at exchange rate of €1.00 = AUD1.35)

Total ($) Per tonne

input ($/t) Investment costs (digestion only)* 5,494,500 305

Capital costs (12 yrs, 5%) 619,650 34.43

Processing costs 486,570 26.87

Costs for digestion

(processing & capital costs) 1,103,400 61.30

Income from sale of energy

(20% - 50% of income in Germany) 139,140 – 347,760 7.73 – 19.32

Treatment costs - digestion 755,640 – 964,260 41.98 - 53.57

Treatment costs - composting 540,000 30.00

Income from sale of compost 270,000 15.00

Treatment costs - total 1,025,640 – 1,234,260 56.98 – 68.57

* Excludes costs for land purchase, site development, infrastructure and profit margin

Page 21: a viable alternative to in-vessel composting in Australia?

Integrated Recovery, Processing & Utilisation

of Organic Resources