Upload
lydia-olsen
View
23
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Aarhus-CERN-Darmstadt-G ö teborg-Madrid-Sevilla Collaboration. Motivation for new experiment. Aim: Demonstrate reaction model reliability (extraction of SF) at low beam energy (3 MeV/u) for loosely bound nuclei Compare 9 Li(p,d) 8 Li ( 9 Li(d,t) 8 Li) with 8 Li(d,p) 9 Li - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Henrik B Jeppesen, INTC meeting 22nd of May 2006
Aarhus-CERN-Darmstadt-Göteborg-Madrid-Sevilla Collaboration
Henrik B Jeppesen, INTC meeting 22nd of May 2006
Motivation for new experiment
• Aim: Demonstrate reaction model reliability (extraction of SF) at low beam energy (3 MeV/u) for loosely bound nuclei
• Compare 9Li(p,d)8Li (9Li(d,t)8Li) with 8Li(d,p)9Li
• Conflicting data sets exist!
• At present 8Li(gs)9Li(gs) most exotic system which allows complete test
M.B. Tsang et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 (2005) 222501
J. Lee et al., Nucl-Ex/0511024
Henrik B Jeppesen, INTC meeting 22nd of May 2006
Previous 8Li(d,p)9Li experiments• 4.875 MeV/u• ~103 8Li/sec• 1.66*108 8Li in total• ~50 identified 9Li• SF(gs→gs) = 1.68±0.23
to 1.02±0.16
A.H. Wuosmaa et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 (2005) 082502
B. Gou et al., Nucl. Phys. A761 (2005) 162
• 9.5 MeV/u• ~5*104 8Li/sec• ~1500 p from 9Li(gs)• SF(gs→gs) = 0.90±0.13
Henrik B Jeppesen, INTC meeting 22nd of May 2006
Recent 9Li(d,t)8Li experiment
H.B. Jeppesen et al., Phys. Lett. B635 (2005) 17
H.B. Jeppesen et al., Nucl. Phys. A748 (2005) 374
• 2.36 MeV/u• ~5104 9Li/sec (1.8109 in total)• 400 t from 8Li(gs)• SF(gs→gs) = 1.9±0.3 or 2.3±0.4
Henrik B Jeppesen, INTC meeting 22nd of May 2006
SF from transfer reactions
• Extraction of SF at:– Smaller binding energy– Lower beam energy
M.B. Tsang et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 (2005) 222501
J. Lee et al., Nucl-Ex/0511024
(d,t)
(p,d)
(p,d)
Henrik B Jeppesen, INTC meeting 22nd of May 2006
8Li(gs)9Li(gs) a good test case
Study the following reactions at 3 MeV/u:
9Li+p→d+8Li
9Li+d→t+8Li
8Li+d→p+9Li
Only need to perform the “easy” 8Li+d reaction
May have to introduce more complex reaction models (e.g. CCBA applied for 9Li(d,p)10Li)
H.B. Jeppesen, A.M. Moro et al. submitted to Phys. Lett. (CERN-PH-EP/2006-010)
Also provides improved data to predict rate of astrophysical 8Li(n,)9Li reaction.
Z.H. Li et al. Phys. Rev. C71 (2005) 052801(R)
Henrik B Jeppesen, INTC meeting 22nd of May 2006
Reaction kinematics
• 3 MeV/u 8Li on CD target• protons detectable in full
angular range• Only proton background
from 16O(d,p)17O and from compound.
Proton contamination Other contamination
8Li(d,p)9Li Lab. vs CM angles
Henrik B Jeppesen, INTC meeting 22nd of May 2006
Beam intensities
8Li REX yield:
5.8108 µC (thin Ta) ~11010 /pulse (std. Ta)
Rex efficiency ~ 2-0.5 % 5107 at target
16O REX yield:
1-5107 16O/s
C-stripping at 3 MeV/u reduction factor ~1/17 up to 3106 /s on target
about 5% contamination of 16O
Possible to accelerate 8Li as either 2+ or 3+
Stripping to 3+ needed in any case
Henrik B Jeppesen, INTC meeting 22nd of May 2006
Experimental setup
DSSSD telescope:
3232 strip DSSSD 60 µm
+ 1.5 mm Si-padDSSSD Telescope
DSSSD Telescope
DSSSD Telescope
Target
• Particle identification above 2-4 MeV
• 10-170o lab. coverage
Henrik B Jeppesen, INTC meeting 22nd of May 2006
Beam Request
For the 8Li(d,p)9Li reaction we therefore request:
1 shift for beam tuning
9 shifts for 8Li on CD target
1 shift for 8Li on CH target
2 shifts for 8Li on C target
In total 13 radioactive shifts is requested
Additional 1 shift of stable 16O needed