Upload
whampstead
View
224
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/27/2019 Abercorn School Objection Letter
1/9
1. Traffic on Fortune Green RoadAfter reviewing the submitted Transport Assessment (Supporting Documents-3222075 -
FINAL TRANSPORT ASSESSMENT.pdf), we are highly concerned with its inaccuracies
and how it deliberately understates the potential impact on traffic on Fortune GreenRoad.
The report contains a number of assumptions which understate both the number of cars
travelling to the site and impact they would have on traffic. These are discussed in
Appendix 1.
As per paragraph 7.10.1 in the Transport Assessment, the school site is open from 8 am
with a start time/registration of 8:45 am. This means that in less than 45 minutes all
parents dropping off children need to enter the site.
Per table 7.4.8 in the report 38 pupils will use individual cars and 16 will car-share,totalling 44 car trips each morning and each afternoon (see Appendix 2)
This means that average one car every minute needs to be entering the site at the
bottleneck at the gates (where it is difficult for standard size cars to pass each other),
swing around into the courtyard, stopping for the car in front, once the traffic light turns
green needs to dive down the single lane ramp (avoiding children being walked across
the mouth of the ramp in order to get to the Southern classrooms), turn 180 degrees at
the bottom of the ramp, manoeuvre past cars waiting to come up, dodge children already
in the car park being walked to the exit (there are no pedestrian walkways children will
be walking in the path of vehicles), park up, unload their children, and then join the
queue to leave the car park, then once up and out, join the queue to turn right out of the
site and onto Fortune Green Road.
This is absolutely unworkable.
In the likely situation that there are queues to exit the site leading to a backup, chaos
would ensue. There would be nowhere to go. The ramp would be blocked, leaving cars
stranded in the car park and the entrance to the site full, leading to tailbacks on Fortune
Green Road.
This is using the calculated trip numbers as assumed in report, which is based on a
school extremely close to a tube station, unlike Fortune Green. Using the trip profile of
Abercorn School itself produces 62 cars each morning from parents (Appendix 2). Add to
this the increased distance from homes increasing the probability of cars being used as
well as the car usage by residents and the staff member and the numbers are
unsupportable.
As explained in Appendix 3 the Daily car trip rates and car trip generation profile of trips
to and from the site during the day can be ignored as it is nonsense.
7/27/2019 Abercorn School Objection Letter
2/9
The following is from 7.9.3 of the report:
Assuming 100% occupancy at the school and all pupils arrived within a single hour, in the AM peak, there
would be a maximum of 50 inbound car trips (45 for the school plus 5 for residents) compared to 19 in the
permission. The TRICS analysis in 7.[11] (Authors note: the report incorrectly refers to table 7.10 rather
than 7.11) indicates that in reality car trip generation in the peak hours would be less than this .
We have shown why the 45 inbound trips (44 student cars and 1 teachers car) are very
likely to be an underestimation. We have shown that the TRICS analysis in nonsensical
and common sense tells us that all trips will be between the opening time of 8 a.m. and
registration time of 8:45 a.m. Therefore the inbound car trips exceeds the maximum of
19 as per the permission in Table 7.2 Consented Use Vehicle Trip Generation from the
Colin Buchanan TA 2003.
2. Plans to Use the Underground Car Park at Alfred/Joan CourtThe entrance, courtyard and car park at the site are not designed to cope with heavy
levels of traffic nor pedestrians.
The entrance to the site is narrow; when the gates are open they swing inwards, and
they naturally reduce the width of the road, and two family-size vehicles going in
opposite directions would have difficulty passing each other at this point.
The application fails to make explicit and prominent the fact that the ramp to the car park
is a single-lane only. This significantly restricts efficiency of movement.
The car park itself is cramped. Two of the proposed parking spaces for the school are
said to be unusable due to the angles of entry required.
There are no designated pathways for pedestrians. Children walking from the designated
parking up to the other side of the car park to their designated exit will be walking into
oncoming traffic.
The impact of this additional traffic and exhaust fumes in the car park has not been
assessed at all and obviously could have a negative impact on the health of the
students, residents and especially the school staff who will have to spend extended
periods of time in the car park.
The intention is also that students are brought from the car park up into the north unit
and those that are based in the south units will be walked across the courtyard, across
the path of cars entering and exiting the car park. This is considered to be a very
dangerous proposal, especially as exiting drivers will be able to see pedestrians only
once they are directly in the path of the car!
7/27/2019 Abercorn School Objection Letter
3/9
Figure 1: View up the ramp from the car park
Figure 2: View from half way up the ramp. The fire exits in the wall opposite are the proposed entrance to the southern
units. Note the wall on the left which completely obscures the view of any pedestrians looking to cross in front of the
path of traffic and into the doors.
Figure 3: This is where the walkway from the north unit exits into the courtyard. Note that directly in front of it is a
parking space for service vehicles, which according to the Transport Assessment would also be used for deliveries to the
school. Note also there is no pathway and no space to install one.
7/27/2019 Abercorn School Objection Letter
4/9
Figure 4: Path of children across the mouth of the ramp and into the fire exit.
Figure 5: The photo is taken from the area of the school's proposed parking spaces. The arrow shows the direction of
traffic coming from the ramp. In the distance the door to be used to exit the car park is highlighted. Children will have to
be walked from cars to the door along the roadway. There are no walkways so they will be walking in the path of traffic.
A major concern of residents is the fact that this is an accident waiting to happen; mixing
children and traffic in a confined space will eventually lead to a child being injured or
worse.
7/27/2019 Abercorn School Objection Letter
5/9
3. Inadequate consultation and noticeThe Statement of Community Involvement states that The applicants have undertaken a
comprehensive consultation programme with local residents and stakeholders While
some consultation has occurred we note:
a) J oan Court residents have from the start made clear their concerns re safety and
nothing we have said appears to have been taken into account in this planning
application. The consultation appears to have been an exercise in going through the
motions rather than a real attempt to address valid and widely held concerns.
b) As owners (defined as is a person with a freehold interest or leasehold interest with
at least 7 years left to run) of part of the land or building to which this applicationrelates, our members do not understand why we have not received notices of
application for planning permission under article 11 of the Town and Country
Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2010 and question
whether this invalidates the application.
4. Noise PollutionContained within Design and Access Statement-3225840.pdf is the Acoustic
Consultants Report.
This report contains pages and pages of analyses of sound levels, construction materials
etc, however, once again, there is a fundamental flaw.
A key part of the application is the intention is to use the playground facilities and sports
pitch (MUGA in the report) of Fortune Green Play Centre located directly west of the
site and overlooked by residents, run by an organisation called PACE,
PACE operates an afterschool club during term-time and an all-day holiday club during
school holidays. In evenings the sports pitch is regularly used by members of the local
community to playing football until 10 p.m. using floodlights.
The residents strongly support PACEs use of the playground facilities and encourages
local children to play together in a safe and welcoming environment.
During these sessions, groups of approximately 20 children use the playground to have
a great time, including screaming, shouting and, hopefully more often than not, laughing
raucously. This can be clearly heard by residents overlooking the playground, especially
as all these flats have balconies, however we have no complaint whatsoever in this
regard.
7/27/2019 Abercorn School Objection Letter
6/9
Something which is completely ignored in the report is the plan for these playgrounds to
be used by 180 children for their morning and lunch time breaks. The manager of PACE
has told us that he estimates the capacity of the outside areas to be in the region of 50 to
70 children. This means that break-times will have to be staggered, with 3 to 4 different
session for both the morning and lunchtime breaks, and as such the much increased
noise levels will be occurring for sustained periods throughout the day.
Figure 6: View from a balcony of Joan Court directly overlooking the playground and sports pitch
This is not to say that residents would oppose a school using the playgrounds in such a
way, especially if it was for the benefit of local children as there is a distinct problem of
lack of school places for families living in the area. However as no assessment has been
made of the impact on noise levels the pupils would have, and it is of course likely to be
substantial, the application should be rejected.
As per policy DP28 of the Camden Local Development Framework adopted in 2010
The Council will seek to ensure that noise and vibration is controlled and managedand will not grant planning permission for:
a) development likely to generate noise pollution;
7/27/2019 Abercorn School Objection Letter
7/9
Appendix 1: How the Transport Assessment Underestimates
Increased Traffic
In section 7.4.7 of the above it assumed that all students who currently live within
walking distance of the existing school sites (37%) will use the school bus. This is
extremely optimistic and takes no account of the much earlier start time required
for such families.
In section 7.4.9 it is anticipated that the catchment of the school will become
more local to Fortune Green and therefore an increase in the walking and public
transport mode share is anticipated. This ignores the fact that the feeder primary
schools remain outside of the borough, so a large proportion of pupils
progressing through the schools will continue to be based in the Marylebone
area.
In section 7.5.2 it is assumed that only one of the 25 staff will drive to work. Again
this appears to be very unrealistic with the increased distance from the existing
schools and the fact that the SHHS travel plan predicts 4. In reality in addition to
increasing traffic, we expect staff cars to add to the parking problems on
neighbouring roads.
Figure 8.1 of the report on page 45 shows the peak period for southbound traffic
on Fortune Green Road is between 8 a.m. and 9 a.m., with 732 vehicles. The
report then goes on to discuss total average weekday traffic flows, which is
irrelevant, and concludes vehicle activity at the school would have little impact on
the amount of peak hour traffic travelling along Fortune Green Road.
The number of additional student car trips extrapolated from Table 7.6 of the
report is 44. Note that no matter the direction of approach to the site, whether
from the North or South, every car will leave the site to return home in the
opposite direction they came, therefore every car will add to the southbound
traffic in the peak hour. An additional 44 cars represents an increase of 6% to the
current southbound traffic of 732 cars. Given that southbound traffic can
sometimes be at a standstill, an additional 6% would be considered to have a
very significant impact especially with cars pulling into and out of the sitemagnifying the problem.
7/27/2019 Abercorn School Objection Letter
8/9
Appendix 2: Student Car Trips
As per the Transport Assessment, it has been assumed that car shares contain 3
students.
7/27/2019 Abercorn School Objection Letter
9/9
Appendix 3: Analysis of the Transport Assessments Daily car trip
rates and car trip generation
Table 7.11 on page 41 which analyses the trips in and out of the car park during the day
is nonsensical and underlines the way the report uses selective data to brush aside
obvious facts. The number of parking spaces available to parents is 12 (ignoring the fact
that 2 of these spaces are unusable due to the cramped conditions and the angle of
entry required). A simple review of this data shows that it is completely illogical; for 6
periods the number of parents cars in the car park exceeds the capacity of 12, and 3
cars will apparently be staying overnight!
In reality all morning car trips will be between the time the school opens at 8 a.m. and the
time school registration begins at 8:45 a.m.