Abstract on Changing Dimensions of Hrm by Shweta

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/11/2019 Abstract on Changing Dimensions of Hrm by Shweta

    1/2

    ABSTRACT

    ON

    CHANGING

    DIMENSIONS OF HRM

    BY :-SHWETA SHRIVASTAVA

    ASSISTANT PROFESSOR (MBA)

    GLOBAL COLLAGE OF

    MANAGEMENT

    Ph. no 8878833415

    EMAIL ID:[email protected]

  • 8/11/2019 Abstract on Changing Dimensions of Hrm by Shweta

    2/2

    CHANGING DIMENSIONS OF HRM

    Human resource management (HRM) is a term which is now widely used but very loosely

    defined. In this paper it is argued that if the concept is to have any social scientific value, itshould be defined in such a way as to differentiate it from traditional personnel management and

    to allow the development of testable hypotheses about its impact. Based on theoretical work in

    the field of organizational behavior it is proposed that HRM comprises a set of policies designedto maximize organizational integration, employee commitment, flexibility and quality of work.

    Within this model, collective industrial relations have, at best, only a minor role. Despite the

    apparent attractions of HRM to managements, there is very little evidence of any quality aboutits impact. Furthermore very few organizations appear to practice a distinctive form of HRM,

    although many are moving slowly in that direction through, for example, policies of employee

    involvement.

    Current models of HRM suggest that expectations about HR roles are changing as organizationsare striving to make the HR function leaner and more strategic. We explain how the concept of

    business partnering dominates respondents' talk about HR policy and practice and raise questionsabout the impact of this in terms of HRM's relationship with employees, employee well-being

    and the career paths of HR professionals. We argue that the profession needs to reflect seriously

    on the consequences of a dominant business/strategic partner framing of HR work, which fails toaddress the duality that has historically always been inherent in HR practice. We conclude that

    there is a need for a more balanced HR agenda addressing human and economic concerns in

    current and future models of HRM.