Acidic Site Determination

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/6/2019 Acidic Site Determination

    1/4

    Determination of the acidic sites of puried single-walled

    carbon nanotubes by acidbase titration

    H. Hu, P. Bhowmik, B. Zhao, M.A. Hamon, M.E. Itkis, R.C. Haddon *

    Departments of Chemistry and Chemical and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521-0403, USA

    Received 17 March 2001; in nal form 13 July 2001

    Abstract

    We report the measurement of the acidic sites in three dierent samples of commercially available full-length puried

    single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs) as obtained from CarboLex (CLI), Carbon Solutions (CSI) and

    Tubes@Rice (TAR) by simple acidbase titration methods. Titration of the puried SWNTs with NaOH and

    NaHCO3 solutions was used to determine the total percentage of acidic sites and carboxylic acid groups, respectively.

    The total percentage of acidic sites in full length puried SWNTs from TAR, CLI and CSI are about 13%. 2001

    Published by Elsevier Science B.V.

    1. Introduction

    Single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs) have

    attracted attention due to their unique electronic

    and mechanical properties [1]. To fully realize

    these properties it is necessary to chemically pro-

    cess the SWNTs in order to purify current prepa-

    rations, and to bring about appropriate

    functionalization. Most purications of SWNTs

    make use of oxidative methods that typically in-

    volve treatment with nitric acid [24]. These re-

    agents remove the caps of the SWNTs and

    introduce defects involving oxygen functionalities

    mainly in the forms of carboxylic acid groups on

    the surface and at the ends of the SWNTs [57]. It

    is important to determine the concentration of

    these defects, since they not only change the

    properties of SWNTs, but also serve as reactive

    sites for SWNT dissolution chemistry [8,9]. Previ-ous determinations of the density of the surface

    defect sites of SWNTs have been reported. The

    evolution of CO2 (g) and CO (g) from puried

    SWNTs heated above 1200 K has been measured

    [7], and used to estimate a concentration of $5at.% defective carbon atoms in puried SWNTs.

    Calibrated energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy

    indicated $4 at.% oxygen atoms in puriedSWNTs [10].

    Acidbase titration methods have been used to

    determine the acidic and basic characters of the

    surfaces of a wide variety of carbon materials [11

    14], including multi-walled carbon nanotubes

    (MWNTs) [1517]. The reported density of surface

    acidic groups in the MWNTs treated with nitric

    acid is in the range 0.20.5 at.% [15,17]. The total

    acidic sites (including carboxylic acids, lactones

    and phenols), can be determined by titration with

    NaOH, while the carboxylic acid groups can be

    individually determined by titration with

    NaHCO3. In this Letter we report the measure-

    7 September 2001

    Chemical Physics Letters 345 (2001) 2528

    www.elsevier.com/locate/cplett

    * Corresponding author.

    E-mail address: [email protected] (R.C. Haddon).

    0009-2614/01/$ - see front matter

    2001 Published by Elsevier Science B.V.PII: S 0 0 0 9 - 2 6 1 4 ( 0 1 ) 0 0 8 5 1 - X

  • 8/6/2019 Acidic Site Determination

    2/4

    ment of the acidic sites in full-length nitric acid

    puried SWNTs, by use of acidbase titration

    methods.

    2. Experimental

    We examined three dierent kinds of full-length

    puried (P) SWNT samples by titiration: Carbo-

    Lex, Inc. (CLI)-P, Carbon Solutions, Inc (CSI)-P,

    and Tubes @Rice (TAR)-P. According to com-

    pany literature, all of the samples were rst sub-

    jected to a nitric acid treatment to remove catalyst,

    amorphous carbon and to begin to break up the

    nanoparticulate impurities. TAR-P SWNTs (pu-

    rity $90%) are from laser-produced SWNTs, [18]while the CLI-P (purity 6080%) and CSI-P

    SWNTs were produced in a modied electric arc

    method [19]. In addition, we studied a low func-

    tionality form of full-length puried SWNTs (CSI-

    P-LF), in which CSI-P material had been further

    processed to reduce the oxygen functionality.

    The SWNT samples were rst washed with de-

    ionized water to remove any acidic residues left in

    the samples. The air-dried samples were then he-

    ated at 100 C for 0.5 h under vacuum to degas

    absorbed carbon dioxide and water. After thispretreatment, the SWNT samples were ready for

    the titration experiments. The titration procedure

    is exemplied below for the sodium bicarbonate

    analysis of carboxylic groups in the SWNT

    (SWNTCOOH).

    Forward titration

    SWNTCOOH NaHCO3 excess

    3 SWNTCOONa

    NaHCO3 determined by titration

    Backward titration

    SWNTCOONa HCl excess

    3 SWNTCOOH

    HCl determined by titration

    In a typical experiment, 98.86 mg of TAR-P

    SWNTs was stirred in 50.00 ml of 0.05 N NaHCO3aqueous solution under argon for 48 h. Prolonged

    stirring was required to allow the solid SWNTs to

    equilibrate with the NaHCO3 solution. The mix-

    ture was then ltered through a membrane (pore

    size of 1.2 lm). The SWNTs collected on the

    membrane were washed with de-ionized water to

    remove all of the NaHCO3 residues. The combined

    ltrate and washings were added to 50.00 ml of

    0.05 N aqueous HCl solution and boiled for 20

    min to degas the CO2 from the solution. After

    cooling to room temperature, the excess HCl in the

    solution was titrated with 2.20 ml of 0.05 N

    aqueous NaOH solution to reach the neutral point

    (pH 7.00), as monitored by a pH meter (Corning

    pH meter 445). By calculation, the amount of

    SWNTCOOH groups in the SWNTs is 0.143

    mmol. The amount of carbon in the SWNTs is

    estimated to be 8.231 mmol by assuming that theSWNTs are solely composed of carbon. The mole

    percentage of the SWNTCOOH groups in the

    TAR-P SWNT sample is 1.7%.

    We also back titrated, in order to ensure the

    reliability of the results (see above). From the for-

    ward titration we collected 60.92 mg of the

    NaHCO3-treated SWNTs, now in the form of the

    conjugate base, SWNTCOONa. After drying

    and weighing the sample, it was soaked in 50.00 ml

    of 0.05 N aqueous HCl solution for 48 h with

    stirring under argon to re-acidify the conjugatebase of the SWNTCOOH. The mixture was l-

    tered through a membrane and the solid washed

    with de-ionized water to remove residual HCl from

    the sample. The combined ltrate and washings

    were neutralized (pH 7.00), with 48.50 ml of 0.05

    N NaOH. By a similar calculation to that given

    above, the percentage of the SWNTCOONa

    groups to the total amount of carbon is 1.5% in the

    NaHCO3-treated SWNTs, which is roughly con-

    sistent with the forward titration.

    To determine the total percentage of acidic sites

    in the SWNTs, 0.05 N NaOH was used instead of

    NaHCO3 in the forward titrations.

    3. Results and discussion

    The mole percentages of acidic sites in the

    original puried SWNT samples together with the

    mole percentages of basic sites in the conjugate

    base SWNT samples are summarized in Table 1.

    26 H. Hu et al. / Chemical Physics Letters 345 (2001) 2528

  • 8/6/2019 Acidic Site Determination

    3/4

    The dierent commercial samples give fairly con-

    sistent results: the SWNTCOOH functionality is

    about 12% and the total SWNT acid functional-

    ity is about 13%.

    The TAR-P SWNTs gave very close values forthe total acidic sites and for the carboxylic acid

    groups; thus virtually all of the acidic sites in this

    sample are carboxylic acid groups.

    A number of the samples gave a higher acidity

    count in the forward direction (leading to, for

    example, SWNTCOONa), than in the back-

    ward step (to produce SWNTCOOH). We at-

    tribute this to a partial purication of the SWNTs

    by basic extraction, in the forward titration. We

    experience mechanical losses in each step, due to

    the ltration process and re-isolation of theSWNTs, so this cannot be quantied but it seems

    reasonable that some of the carboxylated carbons

    [3] are taken into aqueous solution and removed

    by base in the forward titrations. This is particu-

    larly obvious with the CLI-P sample, in which the

    percentage of total acid sites was rst measured to

    be 6.9%. During the backward titration, the total

    basic site percentage of the NaOH treated SWNTs

    decreased to 2.0%. When we repeated the forward

    titration of the total acidic sites in this re-acidied

    sample, the total acidity remained constant at

    2.0%.

    4. Conclusion

    We report a quantitative study of the acidic

    sites in full-length puried SWNTs from the three

    dierent commercial suppliers using acidbase ti-

    tration methods. This approach provides a simple

    and inexpensive method for the routine evaluation

    of the acidic surface defects in puried SWNT

    samples. The dierent commercial samples give

    fairly consistent results: the SWNTCOOH func-

    tionality is about 12% and the total SWNT acid

    functionality is about 13%.

    Acknowledgements

    This work was supported by the MRSEC Pro-

    gram of the National Science Foundation under

    Award Number DMR-9809686 and by the oce

    of Naval Research under Award Number N00014-

    99-1-0770.

    References

    [1] M.S. Dresselhaus, G. Dresselhaus, P.C. Eklund, Science of

    Fullerenes and Carbon Nanotubes, Academic Press, San

    Diego, 1996.

    [2] J. Liu, A.G. Rinzler, H. Dai, J.H. Hafner, R.K. Bradley,

    P.J. Boul, A. Lu, T. Iverson, K. Shelimov, C.B. Human,

    F. Rodriguez-Macias, Y.-S. Shon, T.R. Lee, D.T. Colbert,

    R.E. Smalley, Science 280 (1998) 1253.

    [3] A.G. Rinzler, J. Liu, H. Dai, P. Nilolaev, C.B. Human,

    F.J. Rodriguez-Macias, P.J. Boul, A.H. Lu, D. Heymann,

    D.T. Colbert, R.S. Lee, J.E. Fischer, A.M. Rao, P.C.

    Eklund, R.E. Smalley, Appl. Phys. A 67 (1998) 29.

    [4] A.C. Dillon, T. Gennet, K.M. Jones, J.L. Alleman, P.A.

    Parilla, M.J. Heben, Adv. Mater. 11 (1999) 1354.

    [5] H. Hiura, T.W. Ebbesen, K. Tanigaki, Adv. Mater. 7

    (1995) 275.

    [6] A. Kuznetsova, D.B. Mawhinney, V. Naumenko, J.T.

    Yates Jr., J. Liu, R.E. Smalley, Chem. Phys. Lett. 321

    (2000) 292.

    [7] D.B. Mawhinney, V. Naumenko, A. Kuznetsova, J.T.

    Yates Jr., J. Liu, R.E. Smalley, Chem. Phys. Lett. 324

    (2000) 213.

    [8] J. Chen, M.A. Hamon, H. Hu, Y. Chen, A.M. Rao, P.C.

    Eklund, R.C. Haddon, Science 282 (1998) 95.

    Table 1

    Acidity of puried SWNTs

    Sample SWNTCOOH titration

    (%)

    Total SWNTacid titration

    (%)

    Forward Backward Forward Backward

    TAR-P 1.7 1.5 1.5 1.5

    CLI-P 2.0 1.6 6.9 (2.0)a 2.0

    CSI-P 2.2 2.1 3.2 2.7

    CSI-P-LF 0.7 0.8 2.2 1.0

    a Repeat result after recycling sample.

    H. Hu et al. / Chemical Physics Letters 345 (2001) 2528 27

  • 8/6/2019 Acidic Site Determination

    4/4

    [9] M.A. Hamon, J. Chen, H. Hu, Y. Chen, A.M. Rao, P.C.

    Eklund, R.C. Haddon, Adv. Mater. 11 (1999) 834.

    [10] J. Chen, A.M. Rao, S. Lyuksyutov, M.E. Itkis, M.A.

    Hamon, H. Hu, R.W. Cohn, P.W. Eklund, D.T. Colbert,

    R.E. Smalley, R.C. Haddon, J. Phys. Chem. B 105 (2001)2525.

    [11] M.V. Lopez-Ramon, F. Stoeckli, C. Moreno-Castilla, F.

    Carrasco-Marin, Carbon 37 (1999) 1215.

    [12] H.P. Boehm, in: D.D. Eley, H. Pines, P.B. Weisz (Eds.),

    Advances in Catalysis, vol. 16, Academic Press, New York,

    1966, p. 179.

    [13] H.P. Boehm, Carbon 32 (1994) 759.

    [14] F. Carrasco-Marin, A. Mueden, T.A. Centeno, F. Stoeckli,

    C. Moreno-Castilla, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 93

    (1997) 2211.

    [15] S.C. Tsang, Y.K. Chen, P.J.F. Harris, M.L.H. Green,

    Nature 372 (1994) 159.

    [16] R.M. Lago, S.C. Tsang, K.L. Lu, Y.K. Chen, M.L.H.

    Green, J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. (1995) 1355.

    [17] B.C. Satishkumar, A. Govindaraj, J. Mofokeng, G.N.Subbanna, C.N.R. Rao, J. Phys. B 29 (1996) 4925.

    [18] A. Thess, R. Lee, P. Nikolaev, H. Dai, P. Petit, J. Robert,

    C. Xu, Y.H. Lee, S.G. Kim, A.G. Rinzler, D.T. Colbert,

    G.E. Scuseria, D. Tomanek, J.E. Fischer, R.E. Smalley,

    Science 273 (1996) 483.

    [19] C. Journet, W.K. Maser, P. Bernier, A. Loiseau, M. Lamy

    de la Chappelle, S. Lefrant, P. Deniard, R. Lee, J.E.

    Fischer, Nature 388 (1997) 756.

    28 H. Hu et al. / Chemical Physics Letters 345 (2001) 2528