Upload
angelina-mitchell
View
214
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Action for Improving Supply Chain Efficiency
- A Report to ECR China Board
Supply Chain Efficiency Committee, ECR China Zhengzhou, Nov 6th, 2008
2
1. Action Plan
Order Fulfillment Improvement
Improve Supply Chain efficiency by enhancing order fulfillment, focusing on fill rate and lead Time reliability.
Supply Chain Standard Development
Improve Supply Chain efficiency by driving the development of standards including pallet, truck and dock standards.
Action plan made in May and updated in Oct
3
2. Implementation Review – Order Fulfillment Improvement
Define & Align Order Fulfillment KPI (by Apr 2008)
Define KPIs (Fill Rate / Lead Time Reliability).Align on KPI data source & calculation.
details
Analyze KPI to list reasons & approaches (by May 2008) Share KPI from Supplier & Retailer side. Identify root reasons for unqualified performance. Workshop for listing key reasons and proposed
approaches for improvement focusing on various functions.
details
4
Implement improvement approaches with pilot committee members (May 10th – Oct 2008)
Jointly implement the approaches in pilot retailers
and suppliersMonitor progress and share information among pilot
members on regular baseReview and wrap-up the pilot implementation
2. Implementation Review – Order Fulfillment Improvement
5
Pallet standardization chosen as 1st focus (Oct)
Palletization of logistics operation agreed as the near future development orientation
1.2 X 1.0m regarded as the most preferred pallet size
Members agreed to suggest to the standard when new stores or DCs opening
Key players from the market needed for driving the change - international suppliers preferred for the leadership
2. Implementation – Standards Development
6
3. Next Step – Order Fulfillment Improvement
Deploy updated approaches to all committee members (Nov 2008 – May 2009)
Update the approaches based on the conclusion from pilot
implementation
Implement the updated approaches within all committee members.
Promote the concept and solution via ECR (Nov 2008 – Dec 2009) Standardize concept, KPIs and measurement within ECR members.
Promote the solution within ECR for further supply efficiency improvement and extend it to the two industries.
7
3. Next Step – Standards Development
Assess current China standards and processes being followed from retailers and suppliers (Feb 09) Via survey completion Areas: Data Flows, Physical Truck, Transportation Systems,
Loading Standards, Receiving Capability
Align on the current and ideal state for each standard (TBD)
Prioritize the areas where the committee will focus (TBD)
8
3. Next Step – Standards Development
Develop a plan for testing the focus areas (TBD)
Promote the concept and solution via ECR (TBD)
Standardize concept within ECR members.
Learn from other regions where it makes sense
9
3. Next Step – Sub-Committee Work
Participants
Members involved in action plan: Tesco, Nestle, Coca-cola, IBM, P&G, Mengniu Group, Johnson & Johnson, Watson's, Wal-Mart, Metro
Members started implementation: Coca-cola, Nestle, P&G, Colgate, Metro
More members & attentions from company management are needed!
10
3. Next Step – Sub-Committee Work
Quarterly review meeting
More chance for communications & professional gathering
More chances for detailed case driven discussion for Supply Chain efficiency enhancement
11
Thanks for your attention!
Denny Yang & Leland Jiang
Co-leader of ECR Supply Chain Efficiency Committee
1425 Zhenbei Road, Shanghai 200333, P.R.China
Tel: 021-2207- 8542
Email: [email protected]
13
KPIs Formula Data Source Remarks
Fill Rate (FR)
(Order Qty – Short Qty) / Order Qty Metro Goods
Management System (will be MDW in near future)
1. Over delivered Qty is excluded.
2. Calculation is based on actual goods receiving date.
Lead Time
Reliability (LTR)
Late Delivered Qty / Total Delivered Qty
Defined KPI
2. Action Plan & Status
back
15
back
1). SupplierResponsibility
taking 50%
Stock Availability
Price / Payment Issue
Quality Issue
Minimum Order Qty (MOQ)
Improper Ordering and Delivery
Period setting
1). Promotion Management 2). Mutually Good Forecasting 3). Harmonized Ordering info.
Communicate with Supplier About Metro Standard
Temporarily block the article in Metro system
1). Review MOQ setting 2). Mutually Good Forecasting 3). Central Order
Review with supplier and update If necessary.
Reason Approach
Key Reasons & Approaches
2. Action Plan & Status
16
back
Store does not Input goods receiving
date in time
Reason
1). Review Ordering related SOP if needed 2). Discipline store ordering behavior by training ect.
Approach
1). Define the main problem (e.g. art. Status) 2). Master Data Clearance Project involving Supplier / Retailer
Incorrect Master Date
Store does not place order
in regulated way
Discipline the goods receiving staff in store via his / her superior
Key Reasons & Approaches
2. Action Plan & Status
2). Retailer
Responsibility
Taking 25%
3). Common Issue
taking 25%