Action Plan Action Plan Participatory Planning, Monitoring & Participatory Planning, Monitoring &

EvaluationEvaluationFebruary27,2004February27,2004Presentation by Ellen M. OlivarPresentation by Ellen M. OlivarProvincial Tourism OfficeProvincial Tourism Office

AURORA PROVINCEAURORA PROVINCE

PHILIPPINESPHILIPPINES

VISION/GoalVISION/Goal

Aurora province will be a premier eco-tourism Aurora province will be a premier eco-tourism destination. Its diverse tourist products, its unique destination. Its diverse tourist products, its unique natural and man made attraction, rich history and natural and man made attraction, rich history and cultural heritage, world class supportive services-cultural heritage, world class supportive services-are successfully marketed and sustained through are successfully marketed and sustained through the synergy of efforts of the god fearing and warm the synergy of efforts of the god fearing and warm loving people. Each municipality projects its loving people. Each municipality projects its unique image and yet compliments harmoniously unique image and yet compliments harmoniously with the others while environment and people are with the others while environment and people are both protected in the principle of balance tourism both protected in the principle of balance tourism environment.environment.

AURORA is among the most beautiful province in Luzon

Sanctuary of Nature’s SpledorSanctuary of Nature’s Spledor

Project PurposeProject Purpose

The project aims to formulate, design The project aims to formulate, design and institutionalise a sound, viable, and institutionalise a sound, viable, feasible and sustainable Tourism Master feasible and sustainable Tourism Master Development Plan for the province Development Plan for the province though the PPME approach.though the PPME approach.

Constraints: Constraints: Budgetary constraints, Budgetary constraints, limited manpower, political leadershiplimited manpower, political leadership

Assumptions: Assumptions: Political will, competent Political will, competent staff, willingness of stakeholdersstaff, willingness of stakeholders

Estimated Project CostEstimated Project Cost: PhP 2Million: PhP 2Million Source of fund : Source of fund : Provincial Government Provincial Government

National and Private institutions National and Private institutions

Who are the stakeholders and what are Who are the stakeholders and what are their interests?their interests?

Stakeholders Interest

Environment sector

Preservation and management of Natural resources

Peace and order sector

Safety and security of tourist and the community

Infrastructure sector

Devt of roads ,bridges Communication, transportation And other facilities

Agriculture sector food security and sustainable agriculture

Economic Sector

Trade and industry Tourism products and services

Social and health sector

Gender issue, prevent abuses Psychosocial , health services

Local government Units

Good Governance

Project OutputProject Output

Institutionalisation of the PPME as an important Institutionalisation of the PPME as an important component of projectcomponent of project

design and implementationdesign and implementation Prepared operational Tourism Master Prepared operational Tourism Master

Development Plan Development Plan Enhanced capacities of the stakeholders in Enhanced capacities of the stakeholders in

Situational analysis, implementation, Situational analysis, implementation, monitoring and evaluation.monitoring and evaluation.

OUTPUT 1- Advocacy and Social Marketing

Activities : Performance question

OVI MOV/SOV Time frame

Lobbying and networking with various stakeholders

To what extent the stakeholders were motivated to join the project?

Meetings conductedonce a month

Minutes of meetings /journal

3rd wk March to May 2004

Consultation meetings and round table discussions

Has the meetings provided a positive climate for participation?

Rate of participation(actual vs. expected no.of participants)

Minutes of meetings

3rd wk March to May 2004

Information dissemination

To what extent was support for TMDP generated through info dissemination?

No. of stakeholders who signified their support

Survey form /questionnaire

1st wk April

OUTPUT 2 Assessment of training needs and capacities

Activities

Conduct of survey, TNA questionnaire

Who are in need of training and what are their trng needs?

No.of person and type of trng needs

questionnaire 2ndWk Aril 2004

Holding of trainings and workshops

How has the conduct of training improved the capacities of stakeholders?

Improved competencies Competency questionnairebefore and after the training

June 2004toJanuary 2005

OUTPUT 3 Prepared / implemented Training proposals

Activities :

Source out funds

Was there available fund for the training?

Amount of fund Receipts/voucher Ist wk June2004

Scheduling of trainings, identification of venue

Procurement of supplies and materials and invited speakers

Conduct of training/workshop

Was the training carried out as scheduled and was the venue conducive for learning?

Were the supplies and materials &speakers available?Has the capacities of the stakeholders improved?

No. of trainees AttendedItems/cost of supplies and materialsAssessment before and after

AttendanceReceipts/trng kitsAssessment forms

2ndwk June20043rd wk June2004

OUTPUT 4 Cohesive Goal Oriented Group Attained

Activities :

Team building workshop

Has the workshop improved the relationship of the team?

Workshop conducted

Workshop proceedings 4th wk June

Critical reflection discussions

How was the critical reflection unclogged the bottlenecks and cleared grey areas?

Critical reflection discussions done

Minutes of discussions/records

June 2004 to march 2005

Conduct of climate setting and levelling of expectations

To what extent the expectation was met

Climate setting and levelling of expectationconducted

Proceedings 1st wk June2004

SWOT Analysis

How has the SWOT analysis determine the status of stakeholders to better improve the plan?

SWOt analysis conducted

Proceedings of SWOT analysis

!st Wk June 2004

Signing of MOA/ twinning

How many have signified their interest to act on common objectives?

No of Signed MOA

MOA 1st wkJuly 2004

OUTPUT 5Completed baseline

data

Activities:

Conduct of field work, survey, data collected and analyzed

Were the survey,Collection of data and analysis made in aparticipatory way?

Survey conducted questionnaire July to December 2004

.Validation and brainstorming with the local communityVisioning with the local community and SWOT Analysis

How have the activities changed the perception of stakeholders to better attain the vision?

July to December 2004

Prepare /update land use plan

Was the land use plan prepared /updated for better planning?

Land use plan prepared/updated

Land use plan October 2004

OUTPUT 6 Packaged Tourism Master Development Plan

Hiring of consultant How many consultants and how much?

No. of consultants hired

Contract June 2004

Holding of sectoral write shop

Are the different technical staff equipped for the writeshop

Writeshop conducted

Documentation of writeshop

June to February 2004

Packaging of the TMDP

Was the TMDP packaged on a participatory way?

No. of stakeholders who participated

TMDP February 2005

Output 7 Generated Resources and Sponsorship

Activities:

Conduct pledging sessions

How many signified theirpledges? how much?

No. of donorsAmount of Grant/loan

contract August to December 2004

Submit project proposal for funding institution

How many proposals with funding ? what type ? how much?

No. of proposalsTypeAmount

Approved project proposals

March 2005

Conduct special events such as trade fairs, exhibits etc

To what extent did the special events contribute to resource generation?

Amount of resources generated

Sales form/invoice August to December2004

Policy formulation and passing of ordinance

Are there policies/ordinances enacted for the adoption of TMDP?

No. of policies/ ordinance enacted

SP ordinance February 2004

Adoption of TMDP Were all the stakeholders willing to implement the plan in the TMDP and to what extent?

No. of stakeholders participated willing to implement

Annual reportMemo of understandingPIR result

March 2005