1

ADELAIDE INSTITUTE PO Box 3300 Adelaide 5067 Online

Australia ISSN 1440-9828

Mob: 61+401692057

Email: info@adelaideinstitute.org

Web: http://www.adelaideinstitute.org

February 2016 No 930

____________________________________________________________________________________________________

GLOBALISTS TARGET BRAZIL WITH 'ZIKA' BIO-WARFARE

By Mike King

"All The News That Sulzberger's Propaganda Rag Saw Fit To Distort"

A Daily Web Page Summary of the Dirty Lies, Glaring Omissions, Half Truths & Globalist Bias of The NY Times Front Page Headlines

___________________________________________________________________ FEBRUARY, 2016 1 FED RESERVE NOTE

"We read and rebut their vile crap so you won't have to!"

A FEW RECENT HEADLINES .....

NY Times: Zika Virus, a Mosquito-Borne Infection, May Threaten Brazil’s Newborns By DONALD G. McNEIL Jr.

*

NY Times: Alarm Spreads in Brazil Over a Virus and a Surge in Malformed Infants By SIMON ROMERO

* NY Times: Reports of Zika-Linked Birth Defect Rise in Brazil

2

By SIMON ROMERO

* NY Times: C.D.C. May Warn Pregnant Women Against Travel to Countries With Zika

Virus (Brazil) By DONALD G. McNEIL Jr.

*

NY Times: Researchers Weigh Risks of Zika Spreading at Rio Olympics By SIMON ROMERO and REBECCA R. RUIZ

*

REBUTTAL BY

Zika - Zika - Zika - Zika. It's a replay of Ebola Mania - this time, in Brazil, and just as the build-up to the

2016 Rio Olympics gets under way. Hmmmmm.

Since the days of the anti-Hitler propaganda surrounding the 1936 Berlin Olympic Games, geo-politics has

often been injected into the quadrennial spectacles that are the Summer Olympic Games, the Winter

Olympic Games, and the World Cup of Football (Soccer). With such a massive global audience glued to their TV's and radios, attempts to play politics are inevitable.

Examples:

1936: Berlin Summer Olympics: The hyped-up myth of Hitler "snubbing" Black American champion,

Jesse Owens.

1968: Mexico City Summer Olympics: American Black Sprinters Tommie Smith and Juan Carlos raise

their fists in a Black Power salute as the National Anthem plays.

1972: Munich Summer Olympics: False flag attack said to have been carried out by Palestinian

terrorists kills 11 Israeli athletes.

3

1936 - 1968 - 1972 1980: Moscow Summer Olympics: U.S. leads a boycott to protest the Soviet Union's invasion of

Afghanistan (provoked by Brzezinski and the CIA).

1984: Los Angeles Summer Olympics: The Soviet Union retaliates for the 1980 boycott by boycotting

America's hosted games.

2006: Football World Cup / Germany: Before each game, European footballers are made to hold

banners reading "Say No to Racism"

1980 - 1984 - 2006

2008: Beijing Summer Olympics: With George W. Bush in attendance, the U.S. puppet state of Georgia

attacks Russian territories just as the Opening Ceremonies begin. Putin is forced to return home and order

a counter-offensive.

2014: Sochi, Russia Winter Olympics: American sportscaster Bob Costas delivers a prime time rant

against Russia's "human rights" record; the German national team attends ceremony wearing rainbow

themed outfits, and the Ukrainian President is overthrown by a CIA-engineered coup just as the game are

wrapping up.

4

2014: Football World Cup / Brazil: Pre-tournament "accidents" and "spontaneous" protests already

frame the event in a negative light. The host nation of football-crazy Brazil is humiliated by a

unprecedented score of 7-1 in the final match against Germany -- a debacle that was clearly rigged in

advance (here)

2018: Football World Cup / Russia: Pressure builds on FIFA to remove the 2018 games from host

Russia / a "scandal" takes down FIFA President.

2008 - 2014 - 2014 - 2018

The next big event will be the 2016 Summer Olympics, set to take place in August, in Rio de Janeiro,

Brazil -- the "B" in Putin's BRICS and, as such, a frequent whipping boy of Sulzberger's Slimes. Host

nations invest a lot of money and pride in these showcase events - which is why Sulzberger's Slimes

started sniping at the Rio Olympics as early as two years ago. Why has Brazil become a problem for "the

usual suspects", you ask?

THE 'SINS' OF BRAZIL

By combining with the since-departed (poisoned?) Hugo Chavez of Venezuela, and also with Argentinian

President Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner, to kill the Globalists' dream of establishing the FTAA (Free

Trade Area of the Americas); Brazilian President Lula DaSilva and his hand-picked successor, Dilma

Rousseff, defied the New World Order in a big way.

Big Brazil (along with Venezuela and Argentina) killed the FTAA - a cherished Globalist project that was

intended to grow into the Western Hemisphere's version of the European Union.

Adding insult to injury, the South American giant then joined Vladimir Putin's trade bloc, BRIC (now

BRICS, Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa). And to top it all off, Brazil's condemnation of Israel's

treatment of Palestinians and its steadfast refusal to impose trade sanctions on Iran, with which Brazil

does a lot of business, really 'pisses off' the Zionist wing of the Globalist PRC (Predatory Ruling Class).

5

Let there be no doubt, and even the Western 'mainstream media' confirms this, relations between the

U.S./Israel Axis and Brazil are not good! Indeed, many Brazilians were offended when President Rousseff

was treated coldly during her 2012 visit to the White House. Obongo didn't even give her the customary

State Dinner! (here)

President Dilma Rousseff's involvement with Putin's BRICS trade bloc has incurred the wrath of the

Globalists. During a White House visit, she was deliberately disrespected by Puppet-Boy Obongo. This did

not go unnoticed in Brazil.

Brazil's excellent relations with Iran, in open defiance of U.S. & Israeli demands, is another

reason why "the powers that be" want "regime change" in Brazil.

Brazil is really beginning to 'feel its oats' -- and the Globo-Zionist Axis of Tyranny doesn't like it. Recent

pieces published by the International Russian News Service 'Sputnik' carry some very telling headlines:

New Israeli Ambassador is Not Welcome in Brazil (here)

Looking ‘Beyond South America’: Brazil Hopes to Become True Global Power (here)

Russia Maintains Good Relations With All Political Forces in Brazil (here)

And now, with a major showcase event approaching this summer, a deadly (so they say) mosquito-born

disease emerges out of nowhere. Cue Church Lady of 1990's Saturday Night Live fame in 3...2...1...

6

How conveeeneint that a new mosquito-born disease should suddenly pop-up to "threaten

Brazil" and its upcoming Olympics.

The case for conspiracy is not just based upon the odd timing and sudden appearance of Zika. Now comes

word from "mainstream media" that the disease was created in a laboratory! From 'The Daily Mirror'

(London):

"Was Zika outbreak caused by release of genetically modified mosquitoes in Brazil?"

"The Zika virus outbreak currently gripping the Americas could have been sparked by the release of

genetically modified mosquitoes in 2012, critics say.

The insects were engineered by biotechnology experts to combat the spread of dengue fever and other

diseases and released into the general population of Brazil in 2012.

But with the World Health Organisation (WHO) now meeting in Geneva to desperately discuss cures for

the Zika virus, speculation has mounted as to the cause of this sudden outbreak.

The Zika virus was first discovered in the 1950s but the recent outbreak has escalated alarmingly, causing

birth defects and a range of health problems in South and Central America.

The first cases were reported in Brazil last May with up to 1.5 million people now thought to be affected

by the virus which is spread by mosquitoes endemic to Latin America." (here)

****************

Do not doubt, even for one minute, that these psychopathic Globo-Zionists would not be capable of

pulling off a stunt like this. Their advanced technology is known to exists as is their demonic spirit. World

War III has actually been raging against the BRICS nations for years now, and it is not just a "Cold War".

Actual physical casualties continue to mount in the form of attacks on Chines citizens (knife-wielding CIA-

Uighur terrorists and mysterious chemical plant explosions); attacks on Russian citizens (Chechen

terrorists, downed airliners; and "meteor strikes"); and now, mosquito-born bio-warfare against uppity

Brazil.

If history is any indicator, the run-up to Brazil's Olympics promises to be full of more surprises -- and

some of them may be deadly.

7

Whether Zika turns out to be another Ebola-type exaggeration, or a truly deadly virus, remains to be

seen. But we can say with absolute certainty is that Zika will be used to destabilize Brazil and damage its

Olympic Party.

Boobus Americanus 1: I read an article in The New York Times today about that Zika virus. Brazil

might have real problems with this.

Boobus Americanus 2: And they invested so much money into this year's Summer Olympics. What

rotten timing for something like this.

"Actually, the timing iss purrrrfect when you conssider the geo-political ssituation."

(That was funny, Sugar. And clean too!)

8

The growing assault on our democratic rights

George Williams, Professor of Law at the

University of NSW, December 27, 2015 - 9:00PM View more articles from George Williams. An extraordinary number of Australian laws now infringe basic democratic standards, but we hardly bat an eyelid.

Tony Abbott has been proven correct. Photo: Alex Ellinghausen.

This year has borne out former prime minister Tony

Abbott's prediction that "for some time to come, the delicate

balance between freedom and security may have to

shift". Government agencies can now access the metadata of

every person, journalists can be jailed for reporting on matters

of public interest and Australians can be banished after having

their citizenship revoked. This has led one Liberal MP, Andrew

Nikolic, to suggest that the idea of protecting civil liberties in the

context of national security has become "redundant".

Comments such as this reveal how far the Coalition has

travelled since it took office in 2013. As a new government, it

cast itself as the champion of basic freedoms, and lambasted

restrictions on speech such as section 18C of the racial

discrimination act. Any such pretensions have since been

demolished by the government's own rhetoric and actions. It

has moved on from section 18C to introducing laws that jail

people for up to decade for disclosing information about

intelligence operations that show a misuse of power. Something needs to change if the slide towards ever greater government power, and fewer rights for the people, is to be stopped.

This shift by the Coalition is more than just an example of

changing political priorities. Indeed, the same change has been

evident in Labor, which has voted for every one of the

government's national security measures. Something deeper

and more troubling is at work.

This year I conducted a survey of the statute book to find out

how often our politicians have passed laws that infringe upon

democratic rights. The results were surprising and disturbing.

First, an extraordinary number of Australian laws now infringe

basic democratic standards. All up, I found 350 such laws in

areas as diverse as crime, discrimination, anti-terrorism,

consumer law, defence, migration, industrial relations,

intellectual property, evidence, shipping, environment,

education and health. The scale of the problem is much larger

than might be thought, and extends well beyond a few well-

known examples.

Second, what is striking is not only the number of laws raising a

problem, but that so many have been enacted over recent

years. Of the 350, around 60 per cent have been made since the

September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, with a high number also

enacted since 2013. That event marked an important turning

point. It and subsequent acts of terrorism have given ever

greater licence to politicians to depart from long-accepted

understandings about democratic rights. As a result, measures

that were unthinkable have become commonplace.

Third, since September 2001, enacting laws that infringe

democratic freedoms has become routine. Rights are not only

being removed in the name of national security or counter-

terrorism, but for a range of mundane purposes. Speech

offences now apply to many public places and occupations, and

parliaments have greatly expanded the capacity of state

agencies to detain people without charge or arrest. Laws such as

these have become so normal and accepted that they tend to be

enacted without eliciting a community or media response.

As a result, our elected representatives can abridge democratic

rights without paying a political price. Indeed, in many cases,

such laws pass with the support of the opposition, and after only

cursory debate in parliament.

Fourth, not only has the number of laws infringing democratic

freedoms increased, but so has their severity. The survey

reveals many laws enacted prior to September 2001 that run

counter to democratic rights and freedoms. However, for the

most part, these laws have a significantly lower impact upon

those freedoms than the laws enacted after then.

For example, laws such as section 18C enacted prior to 2001

target freedom of speech, but impose relatively minor penalties,

such as the possibility of having to pay compensation. The

contrast with more recent laws is stark. A number carry the

possibility of a lengthy term of imprisonment merely on the

basis of a person's speech.

These observations reveal that Australia has entered an era in

which politicians cannot be counted upon to uphold our most

important rights. Rather than acting as a check upon laws that

infringe democratic values, politicians are now campaigning for

such infringements. Often, they are doing so with impunity.

This is especially a problem in Australia. We are unique among

Western nations in lacking a national bill of rights or human

rights act. In our system, rights usually exist only as long as

they have not been taken away. This is not an issue if politicians

exercise self-restraint, but if that disappears even the most

important rights become vulnerable.

Something needs to change if the slide towards ever greater

government power, and fewer rights for the people, is to be

stopped. The long-term health of our democracy depends on it.

The most obvious answer would be to follow the path of other

nations, and to introduce a national bill of rights.

George Williams is the Anthony Mason Professor of Law

at the University of New South Wales. http://www.theage.com.au/comment/the-growing-assault-on-the-democratic-rights-ofaustralians20151223-gltv70.html

_____________________________________________