26
Adequate Yearly Progress 2012 Comfort ISD

Adequate Yearly Progress 2012 Comfort ISD. Measures Evaluated Reading/ELA – Percent of students (Grades 3-8 and 10) who are Proficient in Reading/ELA

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Adequate Yearly Progress 2012Comfort ISD

Measures Evaluated• Reading/ELA

– Percent of students (Grades 3-8 and 10) who are Proficient in Reading/ELA

– Percent of students (Grades 3-8 and 10) who Participate in Reading/ELA

• Math– Percent of students (Grades 3-8 and 10) who are Proficient in Math– Percent of students (Grades 3-8 and 10) who Participate in Math

• Other– Attendance Rate

• For elementary and middle school campuses• Districts not offering 12th grade

– Graduation Rate• For high school campuses• Districts offering 12th grade

Standards for Performance

2011-12 2012-13 2013-142010-112009-10

6775

8392

100

% Proficient

Math

7380

8793

Reading

%

of students must pass

in 2014

Student Groups EvaluatedPerformance

Accountability SubsetParticipation

All Students EnrolledOther Indicator

Attendance & Graduation*

•All Students Group•African American*•Hispanic*•White*•Economically Disadvantaged*•Special Education*•Limited English Proficient*

•All Students Group•African American*•Hispanic*•White*•Economically Disadvantaged*•Special Education*•Limited English Proficient*

•All Students Group•African American*•Hispanic*•White*•Economically Disadvantaged*•Special Education*•Limited English Proficient*

Provided that these groups meet the Minimum Size Requirement. < 50 = Not Evaluated | > 200 = Always Evaluated | 50-200 = Evaluated if equal to at least 10% of the All Student group*

AYP Status Labels

• Met AYP• Missed AYP – (Reason)

Reasons include:• Math (Proficiency and/or Participation)• Reading (Proficiency and/or Participation)• Attendance Rate• Graduation Rate

23

1

Accessing the AYP Report

http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/ayp/

www.comfort.txed.net

Campus Libraries or Offices

2012 AYP Report OverviewPage One

Performance: Reading/ELA – 87% Proficient• Reading Performance, 2011-2012– Used to demonstrate proficiency.

• Reading Performance, 2010-2011 – Used to calculate improvement (Safe Harbor).

Performance: Mathematics – 83% Proficient• Math Performance, 2011-2012– Used to demonstrate proficiency.

• Math Performance, 2010-2011 – Used to calculate improvement (Safe Harbor).

2012 AYP Report OverviewPage Two

Participation: Reading/ELA & Mathematics – 95% Participation

• Reading/ELA & Math Participation, 2011-2012– Used to demonstrate participation.

• Reading/ELA & Math Participation, 2010-2011– Used to calculate 2 year average, if needed.

2012 AYP Report OverviewPage Three

Graduation Rate (75%) or Attendance Rate (90%)• Graduation or Attendance Rate, 2011-2012– Used to calculate whether or not the campus or

district met the target rate.• Graduation or Attendance Rate, 2010-2011– Used to demonstrate improvement.

• 5 Year Longitudinal Graduation Rate, 2011-2012– Class of 2010

2012 AYP Report OverviewPage Four

AYP Explanation Table• Summarizes the results of the AYP report

2012 AYP Report OverviewPage Five

2012 AYP StatusComfort ISD

Campus Name 2012 Status Stage

Comfort Elementary School Missed AYP (Reading)Missed AYP (Math) None

Comfort Middle School Missed AYP (Math) Stage 1, Year 1 Math

Comfort High School Met AYP None

CES – Reading 2010 – 73% 2011- 80% 2012– 87%

All Met Met Met

Hispanic Met Met Missed – 85%

White Met Met Met

Econ. Disadv. Met Met Missed – 82%

Special Education N/A N/A N/A

LEP N/A N/A N/A

CES – Math 2010 – 67% 2011- 75% 2012– 83%

All Met Met Missed – 80%

Hispanic Met Met Missed – 74%

White Met Met Met

Econ. Disadv. Met Met Missed – 72%

Special Education N/A N/A N/A

LEP N/A N/A N/A

CMS – Reading 2010 – 73% 2011- 80% 2012– 87%

All Met Met Met

Hispanic Met Met Missed – 86%

White Met Met Met

Econ. Disadv. Met Met Missed – 85%

Special Education N/A N/A N/A

LEP N/A N/A N/A

CMS – Math 2010 – 67% 2011- 75% 2012– 83%

All Met Met Missed – 79%

Hispanic Met Missed – 68% MET-RI

White Met Met Met

Econ. Disadv. Met Missed – 67% MET-RI

Special Education N/A N/A N/A

LEP N/A N/A N/A

CHS – Reading 2010 – 73% 2011- 80% 2012– 87%

All Met Met Met

Hispanic N/A N/A N/A

White N/A N/A N/A

Econ. Disadv. N/A N/A N/A

Special Education N/A N/A N/A

LEP N/A N/A N/A

CHS – Math 2010 – 67% 2011- 75% 2012– 83%

All Met Missed – 70% MET- RI

Hispanic N/A N/A N/A

White N/A N/A N/A

Econ. Disadv. N/A N/A N/A

Special Education N/A N/A N/A

LEP N/A N/A N/A

2012 AYP Performance Reading/English Language Arts - (Grades 3-8 and 10)

All Hisp White Eco Dis Sp Ed LEP0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

89 8692

84

59

71

Met Standard2012 Standard2013 Standard2

2012 AYP Performance Mathematics- (Grades 3-8 and 10)

All Hisp White Eco Dis Sp Ed LEP0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

7972

87

70

41

59 Met Standard2012 Standard2013 Standard

2012 AYP Participation Reading/English Language Arts - (Grades 3-8 and 10)

All Hisp White Eco Dis Sp Ed LEP0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100100 100 100 100 100 100

Participation RateStandard

2012 AYP Participation Mathematics- (Grades 3-8 and 10)

All Hisp White Eco Dis Sp Ed LEP0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100100 100 100 100 100 100

Participation RateStandard

2012 AYP Graduation RateFor High Schools and Districts with a 12th Grade

All Hisp White Eco Dis Sp Ed LEP0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

10098.8 97.7 100 97.5 100 100

Graduation RateState TargetState Goal