1

Administrators Academy

September 13, 2006

2

Our Charge

To fundamentally improve the quality of the interaction between each teacher and each student in order to create critical thinkers prepared to participate in a

complex and diverse society

3

• Districts that unrelentingly focus on their core business of student performance, create and implement coherent strategies around this core and array all elements of the district to drive and support improved classroom instruction.

4

• Improved learning

• Each child

• Each teacher

• Each administrator

• No exceptions

• No excuses

5

CST Test Results- Spring 2006

2 + 5 = 7

9 x 23 = 1,863

56 98+124 278 261.38

21/5489

54,213 – 35,910= 18,303

2x + 8 = 12 x = 2

4x2 = 8x-3 x = 1/2 X2 + 2x + 1

x2 - 1= 3

??

?

???

???

6

Looking at Local District 6….

7

Historically……

8

District 6 CST Language Arts% of Students Proficient & Advanced

2001-2006

11 12 914 15 17

33

2417 20 17

1213 11 8 7 8 9 9 11 9

2317 21

18

33

1918 1720

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

Or…. For ALL GRADES….An average of 2% growth

For Proficient & Advanced StudentsIn Language Arts In Each Year

From 2001-2006

9

19.5

32.6

43.5

6.89

12.6

5.4 6.4 7.1

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Elementary Middle HS

District 6 CST Mathematics% of Students Proficient & Advanced

2002-2006

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

Or…. For ALL GRADES….An average of 2.1% growth

For Proficient & Advanced StudentsIn Mathematics In Each Year

From 2002-2006

10

11

12

• Improved learning

• Each child

• Each teacher

• Each administrator

• No exceptions

• No excuses

13

14

15

16

• Each child

17

• The joy of learning

18

English Language ArtsCST, Spring 2006

All Students, Local District 6Percent Proficient & Advanced

3320

3324

17 20 17 18 17 1915

2622

14 1913

1926

18 14

0102030405060708090

100

2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th

Grade

Per

cent 2004-2005

2005-2006

19

MathematicsCST, Spring 2006

All Students, Local District 6Percent Proficient & Advanced

50 47 4334

1216

2835

4443

1718

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th

Grade

Pe

rce

nt

2004-2005

2005-2006

20

• Each teacher

21

• First teaching is the key.

22

MathematicsCST, Spring 2006

All Students, Local District 6Percent Proficient & Advanced

3 3

19 18

3 315 11

0102030405060708090

100

Grade/ Math Area

Perc

en

tag

e

2004-2005

2005-2006

# of s

tuden

ts-1

766

# of s

tuden

ts-9

83

# of s

tuden

ts-1

55

# of s

tuden

ts-3

85

# of students

23

Algebra ICST, Spring 2006

All Students, Local District 6Percent Proficient & Advanced

4 5 5 410 5 4 5

0

20

40

60

80

100

8th 9th 10th 11th

Grade

Per

cen

t

2004-2005

2005-2006

2280 students 2606 students 1026 students 305 students

# of students

24

• Each administrator

25

• It’s about our instructional leadership.

26

GeometryCST, Spring 2006

All Students, Local District 6Percent Proficient & Advanced

177

2 1

23

3 1 00

102030405060708090

100

8th 9th 10th 11th

Grade

Per

cen

t

2004-2005

2005-2006

235 students 1573 students 1949 students 893 students

# of students

27

Algebra IICST, Spring 2006

All Students, Local District 6Percent Proficient & Advanced

2517

49 9

20

102030405060708090

100

9th 10th 11th

Grade

Per

cen

t

2004-2005

2005-2006

318 students 500 students 680 students

# of students

28

• No exceptions

• No excuses

29

ScienceCST, Spring 2006

All Students, Local District 6Percent Proficient & Advanced

2

26

1

168 7 13

2 1 7 2

54

11 7 5104

49

0102030405060708090

100

5th, S

cience

11th

, Earth

Sci

ence

9th, B

iolo

gy

10th

, Bio

logy

11th

,Bio

logy

10th

, Chem

istry

11th

, Chem

istry

11th

, Physi

cs

9th, I

nt.Scie

nce I

Grade, Science Area

Per

cen

t

2004-2005

2005-2006

5233

stu

dents

102

studen

ts24

50 s

tuden

ts

2279

stu

dents

332

studen

ts

995

studen

ts

1368

stu

dents

104

studen

ts

2130

stu

dents

# of students

30

History- Social ScienceCST, Spring 2006

All Students, Local District 6Percent Proficient & Advanced

81512 12 1820

0102030405060708090

100

8th 10th 11th

Grade

Per

cen

t

2004-2005

2005-2006

4306 students 3978 students 2586 students

# of students

31

• Improved learning

• Each child

• Each teacher

• Each administrator

• No exceptions

• No excuses

32

Taking a closer look….

33

• Reclassification goal-20%

• Increase number of students at second grade who reclassify

• Kindergarten ELD level 1-after 4 months ELD 2

• Improve CAHSEE pass rate

• Decrease Dropout rate

34

• Periodic Assessments– Language Arts 50% proficient or better– Mathematics 60% proficient or better

• CST– Language Arts 45/35% proficient or better– Mathematics 60/40% proficient or better– Algebra 1 25% proficient or better

• MCD– Reduce suspension rate– Placement of students other than SLD and SLI– Timely completion of evaluations

35

• Improved learning

• Each child

• Each teacher

• Each administrator

• No exceptions

• No excuses